ML20052B082
| ML20052B082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1982 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052B078 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8204290669 | |
| Download: ML20052B082 (2) | |
Text
.
p ~%*,,
UNITED STATES
[
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
wAsumarow. o. c.nosse s
j SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION l
RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 75 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-32 AND AMENDMENT.NO. 76 TO. FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-37 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER ~ COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-280 AND 50-281 Introduction-By letter dated FeEruary 24~, 1982, Virginia Electric and Power C'ompany
(.the licenseel requested amendments to License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 for the Surry Power Station Untt Nos.1 and 2.
These changes would revise the
~
Technical Specifications to permit a cali5 ration of seismic instrumentation each refueling instead of semi-annually.
Discussion and Evaluation The licensee requests a change in the frequency of calibration for the seismic instrumentation. (from semi-annual to each refueling). stating that the integrity and the function of the system is not changed by performing the calibration during refueling operations. The system would still be shown to 5,e operational By monthly functional tests and checks.
l' We have reviewed this change and conclude that it is consistent with the NRC Standard Review Plan SRP-3.7.4 and NRC approved Standard Technical Specification for surveillance. We find the change to be acceptable.
G S
820425bd-Ioi
--A=
- = -
r v
. i Environmental Consideration
(
We have determined that the' amendments do not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact. Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendments involve an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.5(d)(4), that an environnental impact statement or negative declaration and environ-o mental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the
[
issuance of these amendments.
Conclusion
[
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that-(1) because the amendments do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered and do not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, the amendments do not involve a signifi: ant hazards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Consission's -
regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the connon defense and security or to the health and safety of
[
the public.
l Date:
" arch 25, 1982 I
i:
i e
l
\\
l
~~.'~
-.