ML20050G722
| ML20050G722 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, 05000142, 05000083 |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1981 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Aftergood S COMMITTEE TO BRIDGE THE GAP |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050G797 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-339 NUDOCS 8204140071 | |
| Download: ML20050G722 (1) | |
Text
m
?
D(WOl LC p [
..g'o UNITED STATES l'
'N NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$.g
-f W/iSHINGT ON, D. C. 20555 8
g RECElVED o
a
%, * * * * * /
December 29, 1981 D
30198 4 I8 Y
Mr. Steven Aftergood s
Committee to Bridge the Gap 1637 Butler Avenue, #203 IN RESPONSE REFER 1r Los Angeles, CA 90025 TO F01A-81-339
Dear Mr. Aftergood:
This is in further response to Mr. Mark Pollock's undated letter received in this office on August 21, 1981, in which he requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act,15 categories of information regarding the UCLA license renewal.
Listed below is an additional document which is subject to your request.
1.
I&E Inspection Report No. 50-83/81-2, July 29-31, 1981, with transmittal letter dated August 10, 1981.
Portions of this document contain information which identifies procedures for safeguarding licensed special nuclear material at a licensed facility or plant. This information is considered commercial or financial (proprietary)
Information pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d) and is being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Exemption (4) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4) of the Commission's regulations.
The non-exempt portions are enclosed.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. Richard C. DeYoung. Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement.
This denial may be appealed to the Commission's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter.
As provided l
in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision."
l Sinc re y,
/
[M.Felton, Director
'lf D, vision of Rules and Records I
Office of Administration
Enclosure:
As stated 9204140071 011229 L
1-339 PDR
F~ jwk3 M,7y.
r'r; [/d/./
bd,*sc FTe#./
FREIDOM OF INFORMATION l
ACT REQUEST pp, j 4 FOZ A. gj _
i
" 'd P-A/ - P/
317 0 "?C 37/CF "O
??CTUC !O" Intervenor hereby requests the follcuing docunents be produced.
hese docunents can te produceri by having copies sent to Intervenors or the" can be rade available for inspection and copyin5 at the I.F:n.
'..ese requests are n:,de pursuant to the Freedom of Infornation Act as well as the riiscovery procedures established in this proceeding.
!stervenor requests waivirr of any copyinC and search fees, as per the Freedon of Infornation Act, as the use to which the docurer.ts will be put is provision of inferration to the Atonic 3afety and. Licensing loarti in a natter of reactor safety, Provisien of a full.
evidentiary record for the Ioard is obviously in the public it.terest.
Furtherncre, Intervenor notes that "EC Staff has not charEed the other party in this proceeding for docu ents provided.
W.e fo11owir4 docueents are hereby reouested for productions all licenseo event reports for the University of Vashington and the University of Florida ArSonaut reactors for the period 1970 to the present, all abnormal occurrence reports fron " of F and " of W hEonaut reactors 1970 to present not ircluded in iten above, a-nual reports for the last,three years from both reactors initial hazard analysis fron "niversity of '4ashington drawin;-s provided URC Staff by " CIA in response to TRC Question r/1, 4-17-80.
reactor core drawings provided by I:RC Staff to G.I. Cort for his study.
AEC Ictter, Price to 3celter, regartling Argon 41, September 9,1960
- p. 2. inspection report 1963 application for relicensing University of "ashington and University of Florida inspection reports,1975 to present, University of *.ashington and "niversity of Florida reactors probabilistic risk assessments for research reactors perforned by
. 3C compilations of statistical data regardirg operating perforrance (r-/ of unintentional scrams, abnornal occurrences, violations) cocparing l
research reactor perfornance.
currert statenent of TRC policy regarding consideration of Class 9 accidents in 3 3s, CIAs, and licensing hearings.
2eg. Cuide 1.60 doeurents detailing results o' or status of review of total sa'eguards requirenents at research reactors nentioned in 12 53C 528, CLI-CO-37 gj f n13,; f
u yv ys s
@asMK) 1981 g
8, #.\\ L I
?\\
\\\\
University of Florida p,
I I/L
, f h s
ATTN: Mr. A. M. Jacobs, Chairman Department of Nuclear Engineering Sciences g7
/dlG A I08IN2 202 Nuclear Sciences Center Gainesville, FL 32611
" Qp -p
}
U 3
G:ntleren:
8 4
p
Subject:
Report No. 50-83/81-2 f
This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted'by Mr. D. E. Moore of this office on July 29-31, 1981, of activities authorized by NRC License No. R-56 l
st the University of Florida Training Reactor facility and to the discussions of g
E cur findings held with you and members of your staff of your staff at the conclu-j sten of the inspection, P
Areas examined during this inspection included your physical security program as l
irplemented under the provisions of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and Materials", and the specific requirements l
of license conditions and your approved Security Plan. Within these areas, the Insp:ction consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative
[
records, interviews with personnel, performance tests, and observations by the inspzctor.
Within the scope of this inspection, no violations or deviations were disclosed.
In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Titio 10, Code of Federal Regulations, activities involving safeguards and s:curity measures are exempt from public disclosure; therefore, the ' enclosed rep rt with the exception of the cover page, which is an inspection summary, will n:t be placed in the Public Document Room.
Sh:uld you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss thea with you.
l Sincerely,
/s/
I R. C. Lewis, Director Division of Resident and Reactor Project Inspection
Enclosures:
See Page 2 6i t vm %m i
sv T F1
r.s ;,e n1 0 19 81 University of Florida 2
Enclosures:
1.
Inspection Report No. 50-83/81-2 (Exempt from Disclosure) 2.
Inspection Summary
/
(Not Exempt) cc w/ enc 1:
Dr. N. J. Diaz, Director t
~
of Nuclear Facilities bec w/o enc 1:
t.icense Fee Management Branch bec w/ Inspection Summary:
State of Florida bec w/ enc 1:
D:cument Management Branch Chief of Safeguards Branch, DS.RSI i
t k
/
4 RII RII RI '
DM=GD$
(/~M
, be rer.ht tre AFGibson R utt er 4
eniu enin emu eiysu i
(
-