ML20050C882

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1981
ML20050C882
Person / Time
Site: McGuire Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/15/1981
From: Reavis J
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20050C875 List:
References
NUDOCS 8204090431
Download: ML20050C882 (2)


Text

.

. . 1 l

l

)

OPERATING DATA REPORT 50-369  !

DOCKET NO.

DATE 10-15-D1 COhlPLETED BY J. A. Reavis TELEPHONE 704.373-8552 OPERATING STATUS McGuire Unit 1 Notes McGuire Unit I under-

1. Unit Name: vent power escalation testing
2. Reporting Period: September, 1981 during this reporting period.

3,41]

3. Licensed Thermal Power ()thr):
4. Nameplat.: Rating (Gross 31Wei: 1,220
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net atWe): 1,180
6. Statimum Dependable Capacity (Gross StWel:
7. Staximum Dependable Capacity (Net StWe):

S. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report. Give Reasons:

None

9. Power Level To which Restricted. lf Any(Net atWe):
10. Reasons For Restrictions. If Any:

nis 31onth Yr..to.Date Cumulative

11. Ilours in Reporting Penod
12. Number Of Hours Reactor Was Critical
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown flours
14. Ilours Generator On.Line Not in commercial Operation
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown flours
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (StWH)
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (SIWH)
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (AtWH)
19. Unit Service Factor
20. Unit Asadability Factor
21. Unit Capacity Factor IUsing 31DC Neti
22. Unit Capacity Factor IUsing DER Net)
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate
24. Shutdowns Scheduled Oser Next o Stonths (Type. Date, and Duration of Eacht: ,
25. If Shut Down At End Of Report Period. Estimated Date of ~.,t:rtup:
26. Units in Test Status iPrior to Commercial Operationi: Forecast Achieved INITIA L CRITICA LITY 8-3-81 INITIAL ELECTRICITY 9-12-81 COstStERCIAL OPER ATION 12-81 R200090431 011015 PDR ADOCK 05000369 R PDR 10/7'l

a -

MCGUIRE fiUCLEAR STATI0fi Operating Status Report

1. Personnel Exposure For the month of August, no individual (s) exceeded 10 percent of their '

allowable annual radiation dose limit.

2. The total station liquid release contribution to whole body dose for August has been compared with the Technical Specifications annual value of 3 mrem; the total release for August was less than 10 percent of this limit.

1 l

The total station gaseous release contribution to any organ dose for August has been compared with the derived Technical Specifications annual value of 15 mrem; the total release for August was less than 10 percent i of this limit.

1

- _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _