ML20050C852

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1981
ML20050C852
Person / Time
Site: McGuire Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1981
From: Reavis J
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20050C847 List:
References
NUDOCS 8204090410
Download: ML20050C852 (2)


Text

- _ _ . . - - -

t OPERATING DATA REPORT l DOCKET NO. 50-369 I DATE 11-13-81 i

COMPLETED BY .A. Reavis TELEPHONE 704-373-8552 OPERATING STATUS a

4 1. Urdt Name: McGuire Unit 1 Notes McGuire Unit I under-went power escalation testing

2. Reporting Period: October 1981 during this reporting period.
3. Licensed Thermal Power QtW ): 3,411 1,220
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWei:

jl 5., Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe): 1.180

6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWel:
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe):

S. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Irems Number 3 Through 7)Since Last Report. Gise Reasons:

None r

9. Power Level To Which Restricted.lf Any (Net MWe): None
10. Reasons For Restrictions. If Any:

This Month Yr..to Dare Cumulative .

11. Ilours in Reporting Period
12. Number Of Hours Reactor Was Critical
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours NOT IN COMMERCIAL OPERATION.
14. Ilours Generator On.Line
15. Urut Reserve Shutdown Hours
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH)
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH)
18. Net Electrical Ettergy Generated (MWH)
19. Unit Service Factor
20. Unit Avadability Factor
21. Unit Capacity Factor iUsing MDC Neti
22. Umt Capacity Factor (Using DER Net)
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate
24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Nest 6 \lonths iType. Date, and Duration of Eachi:
25. If Shut Down At End Of Report Period. Estimated Date of Lt::rtup:
26. Umts in Test Status t Prior to Commercial Operation): Forecast Achieved INITIA L CRITICA LITY 8-0-01
INITIA L ELECTRICITY 9-12-81 COMMERCIAL OPER ATION 12-81 j

' 8204090410 811113 PDR ADOCK 05000369 to/??)

R PDR

McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION Operat ing Status Report

1. Personnel Exposure For the month of September, no individual (s) exceeded 10 (2rcent of their allowabic annual radiation dose limit.
2. The total station liquid release controbution to whole body dose for September has been compared with the Technical Specifications annual value of 3 mrem; the total release for September was less than 10 percent of this limit.

The total station gaseous re: case contribution to any organ dose for September has been compared with the derived Technical Specifications annual value of 15 mrem; the total release for September was less than 10 percent o,f this limit.

. . . . _ _ _ _ -