ML20050C852
| ML20050C852 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1981 |
| From: | Reavis J DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050C847 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8204090410 | |
| Download: ML20050C852 (2) | |
Text
- _ _.
t OPERATING DATA REPORT l
DOCKET NO. 50-369 I
DATE 11-13-81 i
COMPLETED BY
.A.
Reavis TELEPHONE 704-373-8552 OPERATING STATUS a
McGuire Unit 1 Notes McGuire Unit I under-
- 1. Urdt Name:
went power escalation testing 4
- 2. Reporting Period: October 1981 during this reporting period.
- 3. Licensed Thermal Power QtW ): 3,411 1,220
- 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWei:
jl 5., Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe):
1.180
- 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWel:
- 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe):
S. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Irems Number 3 Through 7)Since Last Report. Gise Reasons:
None r
None
- 9. Power Level To Which Restricted.lf Any (Net MWe):
- 10. Reasons For Restrictions. If Any:
This Month Yr..to Dare Cumulative.
- 11. Ilours in Reporting Period
- 12. Number Of Hours Reactor Was Critical
- 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours NOT IN COMMERCIAL OPERATION.
- 14. Ilours Generator On.Line
- 15. Urut Reserve Shutdown Hours
- 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH)
- 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH)
- 18. Net Electrical Ettergy Generated (MWH)
- 19. Unit Service Factor
- 20. Unit Avadability Factor
- 21. Unit Capacity Factor iUsing MDC Neti
- 22. Umt Capacity Factor (Using DER Net)
- 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate
- 24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Nest 6 \\lonths iType. Date, and Duration of Eachi:
- 25. If Shut Down At End Of Report Period. Estimated Date of Lt::rtup:
- 26. Umts in Test Status t Prior to Commercial Operation):
Forecast Achieved INITIA L CRITICA LITY 8-0-01 INITIA L ELECTRICITY 9-12-81 COMMERCIAL OPER ATION 12-81 j
8204090410 811113 PDR ADOCK 05000369 to/??)
R PDR
McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION Operat ing Status Report 1.
Personnel Exposure For the month of September, no individual (s) exceeded 10 (2rcent of their allowabic annual radiation dose limit.
2.
The total station liquid release controbution to whole body dose for September has been compared with the Technical Specifications annual value of 3 mrem; the total release for September was less than 10 percent of this limit.
The total station gaseous re: case contribution to any organ dose for September has been compared with the derived Technical Specifications annual value of 15 mrem; the total release for September was less than 10 percent o,f this limit.
-