ML20050C488
| ML20050C488 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 03/23/1982 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050C487 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-334-82-05, 50-334-82-5, NUDOCS 8204080554 | |
| Download: ML20050C488 (2) | |
Text
g_
t O
r
\\
\\
Appendix A Notice of Violation Duouesne Light Company Docket No. 50-334 B4 aver Valley Power Station, Unit 1 License No. DPR-66 Shikptngport, Pennsylvania As a result of the inspection conducted February 22 - 26, 1982, and in accordance with the. Interim' Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:
Criterion III, Appendix B, 10 CFR 50, in part, states:
s
" Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory
'T requirements and the design basis..... are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions."
" Measures shall be established for the identification and control of design interfaces and.for coordination among participating design
,yj organizations."
g
\\1 "The design control measures shall provide for verifying the adequacy m
of design....".
\\ \\
" Contrary to the above:
(
- (' ) Two design change p,ackages (DCP's), DCP-298 r.,d DCP-299 (a
,?'
7a sample) neither identified the applicable replatory requirements
~
j'i*
nor contained information to demonstrate how the design requirements
_i were correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, i,
' ',,t and instructions'.
n, s
U'
,h '\\f'A(b) A review of three design changes, namely, DCP-298, DCP-333, and
- x. [
DCP-303 (e sample), identified inadequate control of design h'g y
interfaceh and coordinat, ion among participating design organizations
'g, in that the engineering orgenizations did not inform the licensing t
"y organization about the differences between NUREG-0737 requirements hy ),
and the actual design in a timely and controlled manner. Additionally, the licensing organization did not appraise the engineering
-e
}'.
organizations of NUREG 0737 committments made by a corporate officyr in a timely and controlled manner,
(
s.
A{A
..(c) The>. design verificatio)f letters for DCP-298 and DCP-299 (a
\\'
sample) lacked the necessary information for verifying the
. adequacy of the respective designs.
3
-A
/
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
p x
\\
A.~
tJ';.
s s
b
$$Ng 3o$$4 0FFICIAhP.ECORDCOPY O
c1 Pt*
e
= we am
\\-
4
S/-
l-f
.fne Appendix A 2
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duquesne Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Where good
+
cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending your response time.
'*/
The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance
" 0' procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,' PL 96-511.
N E 2 3 M?r Metalmsned By: 6. E O
[-
' Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Engineering and Technical Programs OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
.-.