ML20050C372
| ML20050C372 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1982 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050C373 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8204080443 | |
| Download: ML20050C372 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1981048
Text
,
-
- _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
f
.
.
s
l
MAR 221962
<^T
~-
i
%
UECEWSO
,
'
~3
RPR 7 1
Docket No. 50-373(DEPT)
6
e
Commonwealth Edison Company
h
Ic
I
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
%
f
Vice President
j
N
'
Post Office Box 767
g
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs.
H. M. Wescott, J. H. Neisler, R. N. Gardner, R. B. Landsman, and W. J. Key
of this office on December 1-4, 9-11, 14, 17, 29-30, 1981 and January 13,
1982, of activities at the LaSalle County Nuclear Station, Unit 1, author-
ized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-99 and to the discussion of our
findir.gs with Mr. L. Burke at the conclusion of the inspection.
As a result of potentially significant inspectica findings and concerns
as to whether the as-built structural componente met design requirements
at the LaSalle Station, a meeting was held in the Region III office on
December 22, 1981, to discuss these concerdi and the further plans by
Commonwealth Edison to evaluate their significance. The results of that
meeting are documented in Inspection Report 50-373/81-51.
Subsequently,
on January 28, 1982, a second meeting was conducted in our offices to
discuss the results of Commonwealth Edison's additicnal review of the
adequacy of as-built structural components and to discuss Commonwealth
Edison's practices for incorporating Field Change Requests into final
design packages.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined
during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted
of a selective examination of procedures and representative records,
observations, and interviews with personnel.
I
i
8204080443 820322
DR ADOCK OSOOOg
g
.
'
_
_ _ - - - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
.,
.33 f,2 OOP)
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
During this inspection, certain cf your activities appeared to be in
noncompliance with NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed
Appendix. A written response, submitted under oath or affirmation, is
required. As part of your response to the items of noncompliance, please
submit the results of your inspection program conducted as a result of
our initial inspection findings, including engineering judgments on which
you base your conclusion that there is reasonable assurance that structural
components are built as designed. Also, please submit the description
of your system for incorporating Field Change Requests into final design
packages.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy
of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will
be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains
any information that you (or your contractors) believe to be exempt
from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a)
notify this office by telephone within ten (10) days from the date of
this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and
(b) submit within twenty-five (25) days from the date of this letter
a written application to this office to withhold such ir. formation.
If
your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than seven
(7) days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly
so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with Section
2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit
executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document
or part sonaht to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of
the reasu... which are the bases for the claim that the information
should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires
the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in
10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought to be withheld shall be in-
corporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods
noted above, a copy of this letter, the enclosures, and your response
to this letter will be placed in the Public Document Room.
1
l
l
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _
.
.
.
-
,
i
Commonwealth Edison Compnay
3
YAP 2 21982
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
itc;iginnt signed by C.E.1:orclien" -
C. E. Norelius, Director
Division of Engineering and
Technical Programs
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Notice
of Violation
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-373/81-48(DETP)
cc w/encls:
Louis O. De1 George, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
R. Cosaro, Site Construction
Superintendent
T. E. Quaka, Quality
Assurance Supervisor
R. H. Holyoak, Station
Superintendent
B. B. Stephenson, Project Manager
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII
Mary Jo Murray, Office of
Assistant Attorney GenerJi
,
,
RIII,Y
'k
.
RII
RIII
RIII
RIII
RIII
RIII
PIII
$l
@.$)RU ?b
Jh
Wescott/jp
N isl r
er
M dhman
Walker Knop " N
lius
3/5/82
q
3.,gq_%2
,gg-
$
,