ML20050C356
| ML20050C356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1982 |
| From: | Barnes I, Oller R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050C346 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900255 NUDOCS 8204080430 | |
| Download: ML20050C356 (13) | |
Text
_ _ - _ _
ORGANIZATION:
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY KIN-TECH DIVISION ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA HtFUKl INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900255/82-01 DATE(S) 2/8-12/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 26 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Pacific Scientific Company Kin-Tech Division ATTN:
Mr. P. A. Hadnagy QA Manager 1346 S. State College Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92803 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. P. A. Hadnagy, QA Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(714) 774-5217 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Mechanical Shock Arrestors NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: The nuclear component work output of this division is 60%.
The division holds a valid ASME Certificate of Authorization to use the "NPT" symbol.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: N dlbA'
'3- $ 1 2 R. E. Oller, Reactive Components Program Date Section (RCPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
APPROVED BY:
W 3 - 2 2 - ? 2-I. Barnes, Chief, RCPS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
1.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B; and 10 CFR Part 21.
2.
SCOPE:
This inspection was pecformed to evaluate the implementation of the vendor's QA program in the areas of:
status of previous inspec-tion findings; equipment calibration; procurement document control; pro-curement source selection; and procurement product acceptance.
In addition, a follow-up was made in connection with a 10 CFR Part 21 Report by Bergen Paterson Pipe Support (B-P) concerning inadequate clearances between B-P designed pipe clamps and Pacific Scientific Co. (PSCo) brackets at Callayay Unit No. 1.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: Callaway, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-483 DESIGNATED ORIGINAL Cortified By L(_Act4w tk b 9204080430 920326 PDR GA999 EMVPACSC 99900255 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY KIN-TECH DIVISION ANAi:EIM, CALIFORNIA
~
REPORT 1NbFtbl1UN NO.:
99900255/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 5 l
A.
VIOLATIONS None.
B.
NONCONFORMANCES None.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS None.
D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS 1.
(Closed) Nonconformance A (81-01):
Failure to correcc the internal control document No. SP-344-PS, Revision 0, to include the heat treat-ment documentation requirements of Bechtel Specification No. 5023-409-2,f7 SCE No. 4129, dated September 1, 1974, as committed to in the two PSCo response letters to the NRC Inspection Report No. 80-01.
The inspector verified that in accordance with the PSCo response letter dated October 14, 1981, the Standard Practice SP-344-PS was revised (in Revision 3) to include the Bechtel requirement that the location of thermocouples on the parts and placement of the parts in the furnace will be shown on the chart or on an approved sketch.
To provide preventive action, PSCo performed an internal audit on February 5, 1982, of heat treatment documentation.
l 2.
(Closed) Nonconformance B (81-01):
Failure to properly describe the voting membership of the MRB organization in the QA Manual.
The inspector verified that in accordance with the PSCo response letter dated October 14, 1981, Section 12 of the QA Manual was revised on May 27, 1981, to designate the MRB voting members as being the QA Manager and the Project Engineer, with other departments' personnel functioning on the MRB in an advisory capacity only.
To provide preventive action, PSCo performed a semiannual review i
of the QA Manual to identify any required changes and to assure that it is maintained in accordance with the Summer and Winter Addenda of the ASME Code.
l
ORGANIZATION:
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY KIN-TECH DIVISION ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA HtPORI ANdetti1UN NO.:
99900255/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 5 E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS 1.
Equipment Calibration:
The inspector reviewed Section 14, " Calibration of Measuring and Testing Equipment" of the QA Manual, and PSCo procedure QCIP-ID-19, to verify that a written system was available to control the calibration program.
Observations were made in the shop of the calibration status of 20 precision measuring tools and devices which were used in acceptance inspection cf finished parts for mechanical shock arrestors. These devices consisted of setrings, micrometers, dial bore gages, calipers, plug gages, height gages, surface plates, dial indicators, an optical comparator, a profilometer, and a supermicrometer.
To verify that the devices were identified in the system and calibrated in accordance with the written program using certified measurement standards with known relationship to National Standards, a review was made of the PSCo Calibration History Record Cards and subcontractor's Certificates of Calibration for the above 20 devices.
Within this area, no nonconformances or unresolved items were identified.
2.
Procurement Document Control:
The inspector reviewed Section 6,
" Material and Parts Planning" and Section 7, " Preparation and Control of Procurement Documents For Materials, Parts and Special Processing,"
of the QA Manual, to verify that written measures are available to control procurement documents.
To verify that the QA program procedures were being properly implemented and that procurement documents suitably included or referenced necessary requirements for materials, parts and services, a review was made of:
(a) a Manufacturing Order (traveler) which included purchased services such as machining, heat treating, centerless grinding, passivating and chemical etch marking; (b) a purchase order for raw material and the related PSCo material specification; (c) a raw material code identifi-cation log; (d) a supplier's C.M.T.R.; and (e) two purchase orders (one for a recirculating bearing assembly and the other for a thrust bearing kit).
Within this area of inspection, no nonconformances or unresolved items were identified.
ORGANIZATION:
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY KIN-TECH DIVISION ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA REPORT 1NaetLitun NO.:
99900255/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 5 3.
Procurement Source Selection:
The inspector reviewed paragraph 7.1
" Approved Supplier List" of Section 7 of the QA Manual, to verify that written measures were available to control procurement source selection, and assure that it includes integrated action by one or more responsible groups or departments, such as quality assurance, engineering, and purchasing.
To verify that evaluation and approval of subcontractors include such measures as:
onsite survey of capabilities including the quality assurance program, acceptance based on a subcontractor's' being a holder of a valid ASME N-type authorization applicable to the items or,F,annualJervice to be supplied, a history of subcontractor's performance, and a resurvey and evaluation, a review was made of:
the current Approved Supplier List, records of the last PSCo annual surveys and/or reviews of ASME Certificates and Supplier Evaluation Reports for ten suppliers of materials, welding, heat treating, plating, testing, nondestructive examination, calibration, and survey / audit of suppliers.
Within this area of inspection, no nonconformances or unresolved items were identified.
4.
Procurement Product Acceptance:
The inspector reviewed Section 8,
" Control of Materials Before Fabrication" of the QA Manual, to verify that written measures were available for the control of product acceptance activities.
To verify that the QA program procedures were being properly implemented and that the results of product acceptance activities are documented and reviewed for acceptability by responsible per-sonnel a review was made of receiving inspection documents related to receipt of machined parts, consisting of a purchase order, drawing, supplier's Certificate of Compliance, Manufacturing Outline (traveler),
Trouble and Failure Report and a Product Quality History Log Sheet.
For raw material receipt inspection, a review was made of a purchase order, drawing, Manufacturing Outline (traveler), PSCo specification No.12.11.1, M.R.C. Checklist for inspection, and the ANI Buyoff Log.
Within this area of inspection, no nonconformances or unresolved items were identified.
l l
ORGANIZATION:
PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY KIN-TECH DIVISION ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA ntFUHi ladetLiiua NO.:
99900255/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 5 5.
A 10 CFR Part 21 written report was made by Bergen-Paterson Pipesupport Corporation (B-P) on March 6, 1981.
This report concerned insufficier.t design clearance between combinations of B-P special designed pipe clamps and Pacific Scientific Company (PSCo) designed mechanical shock arrestor forward brackets furnished by B-P for use on the Callaway Unit 1.
A follow-up inspection was made at B-P and documented in Inspection Report No. 99900209/81-01.
Since the findings concerned the PSCo designed brackets, a follow up was also made at PSCo in Anaheim, California.
In summary, review of records at PSCo supported the findings at B-P.
The mismatch appeared to have resulted from B-P's use for piping clamp design purposes of the PSCo sales catalog drawings for the brackets.
These catalog drawings had not beca revised to reflect the changes made in November 1976, in the PSCo engineering design drawings.
It does not appear that B-P had contacted PSCo prior to using the catalog drawings for design purposes, as directed by the PSCo sales catalog front page " Notice."
After the initial notification of the deficiency by B-P to PSCo by means of a Discrepant Material Report L-221, and several telephone conversations during January 1981, between PSCo and B-P, and including furnishing of requested information to Bechtel Power Corporation by PSCo, the PSCo QA Manager indicated he had received no further con-tacts concerning the problem, and was not advised of what correction had been made at the Callaway site by B-P.
Further discussions established that PSCo had reviewed their sales orders for the affected Models PSA-3 and PSA-10 arrestors assemblies (furnished to B-P and numerous other customers), for the period of April 1977 through April 1981, and determined there were no other reports of mismatch interference.
The problem was limited to the special design by B-P of pipe clamps for the Callaway, Unit 1 site.
The B-P purchase order for the SNUPPS-Callaway Unit 1 was received by PSCo on September 21, 1979.
In conclusion, it was determined that the PSCo engineering design drawings governing the design of the Models PSA-3 and PSA-10 forward brackets were revised in November 1976, to provide a forged configur-ation, but PSCo failed to revise the sales catalog affected drawings until January 1981. These obsolete catalog drawings were used by B-P for design reference which resulted in the mismatch.
Also, written measures to control the issuance, revision and use of the sales catalog drawings were not available at PSCo in Anaheim, California.
55
)
2 v e
r l
w c e
b b
a P z 7 Fy m
c u
i P.
A.
N l
t ttp 2
- i. C mnnp t f
'J oof 4
eeea iio t mm tt I uuf er/
ccI k o l oo(
ADD cp 2
i n
oee r
tffo 2 'J s DR g r.
s nooi a
e s
7 f
P ueei
/
3 "L 5 2-s q pt v neyae g
i mSTDR 2
2 u
lo C1234 2
2-
/
s 'J p
r i
4 A
u f s- /;c P
/
c D
1 n
n E
l T
i s
a f
I C
e ),
M c
M E
r /r C
A J
(g X
B e
E U
o A
e o
P I S
S
/
T E
c A o C 1
i L
f E
T
)
G 2 y
S M
I U
T
/
/
ra C
4, _ S 8 s
O e
s D
c u
/ 5 e
s 0
c f
e y
n c
/
s s /-
f l/+
f lc i
y fo e
ro f
c r
em i
r n
de c
d i
?> %
rM e
/w f O
p
?
l S
e sa
(
o a
/
anr c.
/n hrer S
5 / d cete e
/c
/
c rtth c
r s
n e
e PILO unet
'c i
c r F C
r s Y t
i S &
S f 5678 f
f d
/p, f
a 7
n
/
r_
c o
0
/o e
i s
t f /a D
e ael Sy 9 4 7-p cra 2
y gi u u 5
h T nf d n R
l iiea t wccM naeo o
erprA lu mDSPQ r
d u
t o
c t
M l
2 3 4 o
.D1234 c
/
1 i
e p
p r.'
s c
n S.
I
snspect:r
- . E d //er Dccket No, f9.w25r )
Report No. #c-o-/
l scape / Module Ew/v w,,/
Page 2 of f
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
/
Ge //dra //r4 5
I 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 Sec fir >, /4 "Ca fi;/rasid, ef'/% su,isig,4,,/ pyr'/;,c 4; u,2,ue /
f
- f VAf /"5 c'o.
SM Manua/
r 76/
C t//a in /c' Az sncea)
~
A 3
Bo(PWcirF Q C /P'-JD-/P "7s> siz er &
i Ca8 Ara 7lb>> afJhske-c//c>, EPjc//p me ni. '
o i
3
/
r s hJra /< >, recc'r<fs e <>>s}s% >, a /ef 'PSro - Au fc r <- Re>e e r/
V
/
carde d,^#sc4-enc /,,
re r 4f/ca 4= s <fc a- /;j,a /,'eu fc, 20 o meis/c>, measur/na &nrec usw dbJ
/risNe cltbh d-; e de c ?
Y C s7/s Apfeary's ef<rtreshrs s&nde's AA.
/
r Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Date of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter
~
4.
Revision (If applicable) 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary)
Insp;ctor
- .E #//"
Docket No.?WG253 Report No. #2-vi Scope / Modulo 8eeare/vn / Jeevavo /
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
(~c n'lro l 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
4 fe //enn, g 9e//ci, < cf PJfe GA Ma o o a / <
_\\
M 4. cl '#7ei &7 /k /c one/ /Pi/7's F/,ss,n /he
S-p w -
f (z1 d4 h 'Sewra l/ro sn/(cv?/ro/ct~BNcrf /rzed
),elm en 7 s &r MWorta ls, feri/S <; n/ Sox / ri f. fir-re sSie 5-27-/ /
/
s d Me'rrzo4 c lc!r m l t?h/?r f/ra &lrr) Sc r 2
/-
A e urra n 3~/c /> f n b / # s - /~/905-Si 1lAre n A's ? 4' e c n fro //p/r 77lse//nlnc _ / ser / Yre d A g, cas,67/ec.s pri ncAh g sec/ e dein >!cI/ e /c/zik a l
l A' A on s s a ve nc v
J
/
4.4
' -;?
8
& c-,c/ cf c7e/ a // /e A)S 4r 41c s
/
- Cp ec y ed e / kl. 2l. CA e c fr-fi s Y a
S
,/
Fe //cwi n 7,- e ce v r/s Y cA',. e c.me nfs cc>n x zc- >, Yc c.
raw mafdrlc / oes re Ae> s r=
rn A G, 4R-25c;' ? (
V-f -Jb (2)
PS cc. Spe c ; N c ca. fw >t be, /2. cp 9.//- 7 5 (3 ) /Pa co h h e/<a I f o c/p fehnNGralreh Ac9 Sder /
+- 7-D M Supp //Pr C. M T R fcr P G AC JP-2/ f 7 C '
o 6
6 WG. Ab 2de'3Y /~e r$0ni s le/ ;ff8, /Up c/ rc ulo-hrc' 6Lv ri erc/>Ses.)
/C -Zrr-7 9
~
I
/
?
5 R G.Ae 2 S 79/ fc, a Thrs / Ben ri h<j Et ir s -g a.
Document Types:
Columns:
J.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) 1
Bnsp::ctor
- R E. O //r r Docket No. F#e255 Report No. pa-se tcope/Hoduic,ProcuremFnf Page 4 of 7
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Soc /tre [e/s c 4c, >r I
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
V
.0rc9tand 2 / %p <rve/.Simjd, j'/5/'effpcVen 7 cf' f4r
/
/
- f,( o G?d //'GM c/G /
f27-0/
d 2-
/
rc, < ~, / 4m m/ Sc/r> o /i e r L;sY "
i 2 P-Es AA 3
cf
/'S G >7o //b cce Ve6s.5 eftfC'In s c/r vp y s b jG-o'y NA.
som/wrx A we/cus J'
/b.,c rc4 ef !<'rt=+ 1'
.P5 cc - A>> >> c, a / Sc/rvecss ancfASHE O r 'i A rs Yr s o fs us,r. /,,de s
<< >, cf AT$ E va /c/a '{ tc'n v
kno//s fcr Yp ! Suno/iNrs r ma Ven'c Is
-e/eS&
e A%,4 Ms/~
,,/lVne m b;?a, sv>?c4 sivu e hi$
e'rammafe$
ha Adradu, d % m,Jevof;/ ef su/m /res.rs -
m y/ous
^'-A -
/<
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Da te of Document 4.
Revision (If applicable) 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary)
8nsp:ct:r
/RE O#ar D eket No. wfct 255 Report No, pr-of Sc:pe/M;dulo O cc urre'e d /?c /ve'/
Page 5 of,7 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Accc,o/cr n re 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
A' fec /,e>, f, '~r af<a/ g f4f,,/<< /& fare fa 6r;cafn
e
- f l F f'S Cc. C?A Ma<na/
S.27-f /
6 L
fe EccuiM re cc <cfs cirr-d' iG r i n s,pr= c fic n cf szurlime cf'
. r>n r/ r ka 6 << a / cccff Af~/C 3 G :
c> /' G. 2 3fE' 7_
S-:: 7-6/
MA th) A ra tui m; 44' t'fc/59z Jg
. (i?) bu/;kt ce r 'lif} ca fe of' G:xn//cn ce 12 -3t-S r
& /1.
=ch'cu fr#a w /fa ferm/r.s,
- 6) Rcs,Alb. 2.5 7 7 4 J-/5 4 z c2) 6f /><., w i n e, Ac //c /C 97 c'
&) Mant'ft, chiri a s Oc///in e
,'r a ve/e r
,cu N) /'. W e Sm=ri f co c>r Je= /2, //' /
(S) M /?. 5 C/re c/r/i s'Y Q)
A As.Z Buy c ff ' L o,v -
~
Document Types:
Columns:
1 Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
fifnsp;ct:r ~~ /f'. fv//-,
vocWetTo. wm Report _ilo. Jr-ce Scipe/ Modulo M e d A # Moogs/
Page ( of
-p j
f DOCUMEtiTS EXAMI?1ED 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
~7
- ech6/ <@ mas G,,,,.,a /,c s,,, A/,., 4 B& c47.ccilA,,,
hfs /ws wnc6n/9horseres 2 vncfa# ?%e Ce //s c</ar u, l/'h ll / flft**
/2-2[G Ad.<4 2
~7 B-P /s7&, is ffc~c.
n, /4 o Ha chd di g c reoa7 nt P/a fer la / Doc,-/ h A-22/
,2 -to-fc T
/
fo //co />? o re ccr/c d Je/<=ndene rex & r sa b cm s :
. G) 6-pbe ff Co.
/-5 4 /
/vA 6)
PS Co /c 2 -P i-7-d'/
.(%) 2 -P k P J Co.
i - 2 2 -s i
'l
/
Fe//cwjem
/s Co ss /rs cale/c ai d r a w / n <g 5 G) Fre!/in w,4 < r/c/mer Atl// re uac7lchne usf Evchig.
s t
/~C A M d'o. //ef69F-G'~T 2runrn/ Bra c fr#llfcc6/PS/1 - 2 y/lfo 0
&) Ab N'c' /59793 Wec&/PSA-/c-e fec~
Gy) A4 / N /597-G k H e /s / P'7A' ~ 3
//2 /
N) 4's. /6'c? /577-6k
' Mce6/ PI4-er
> /2 /
5
/
fc//o ev/ru, /5 Ca. Dnal Assemb4 c/eshc +1 c/rewkm s en c/E~nhn ee r in g C 4' n y c-ivs9 r ce c/
<J Document Types:
Columns:
- 1.. Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
l Inspector
/2f~. G//p/
Docket No.priccess Report No.f?-ci Sc:pe/ Module /% de a Os ops-/
Page 7 of 7 a
j f
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED l
l l
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 1
Skc'?&
/l& & )
(' < > l) racin n a L o.
'rc: / 5 9 8
/f-/- 76 6'
Gn Ec/v, 49lo-,ac fc, s
/ectErge 7;,,, /pu,,,,j,;,
i. -, c/,4a,/sb/5'/F /Ps.4-3
,6&rs q.
WF-7C 2
l i:,)
, n ya niin c, ocs //O/576
//-/c-76 2
Gs) s c'st/
(An m <= C -G r Ihuc, Av. /f0 /.5PC 77n a / AsN p>J/! PS4 -/c,u-g/o 2cey
/'-/c-7s (c) G 4 /c q s/r, kk fc? - AW 2 OU &
W7f
(*
6
/
n> < o <c/ e, f* PHo
- a li ci /s d e r s E/r c /r % bles f&r 254 - 3 $ PS/%-/c M4 7
/
rn /a tu a-e-c/r i ' /
R-P Pine c%p sfrrfrb F s
,5cr 26lf'6 -6 Se e r a / "s ifk $cyc-/5 Awc / a I i-/4 4i n
/
,/
ffb n < n/ cf PS CN Safes DcocrYm mif TGbefc h ci,s c>f ca /p<
ur/ prs 7% B-/' o n c'!a'6/w cw s1c':a er s e
z in PSA-T e, n/ J'S,4 -M n s s,c s>> A // 2 <
fc/ r >? /g4f Ac, PS*Co f~cv y'4 es aw< wc6 of Wy7 xdrew4' 2/J'E.
mA
/
/
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other(Specify-ifnecessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) e
. PERSONS CONTACTED
.5. O fn b ft c-c/2rce[ic C
f~'2 /62-Company
/ri h - Tre4 O ' v 5 < c '~
Dates Docket / Report No.
'799fGE"55lSI'"I Inspector S S ONF '
Pa9' Of
/(ge aNpn c&d' f/e Ev,1 /fc=c= 7's nf -
M NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (D1 ease Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print}
r CArys es /
Sr. r; A f n., r.
PS Cc -
J Ect /c n aPrec4. c/ chm /,4 Jhwu
/
/
7, 0 a r Vry 2N.5 ru= c lr Y 7
,4,7py g-Ye {ss M't? n et fr cT & V tv cs pcsc/ par Prey /0 r s Netc4d </
4'A Mo no v r x
e
?
./ /
./
Ya Ytlr71i' ffr 4
]h s o e c lcr r l
c aII /p J7 *5f)('} [
/
/
X E
Tbom57o G 'A $ c w p'r V / S d r T.
/V://ctn/
8//c'An / <> 4 Coocorviser u/
l l
l m