ML20050C345
| ML20050C345 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/26/1982 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Hadnagy P PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050C346 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900255 NUDOCS 8204080420 | |
| Download: ML20050C345 (3) | |
Text
F e
o
+
MAR 2 61982 Docket No. 99900255/82-01 c.2 Ig
+
g s
01 n3CEiND
-3 Pacific Scientific Company 2
OR?
iggg ;
Kin-Tech Division 61 c ma er, m.2 ATTN:
Mr. P. A. Hadnagy 2
C g'" w a 4
QA Manager p>'
1346 S. State College Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92803 9
d Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA program inspection conducted by Mr. R. E. Oller of this office on February 8-12, 1982, of your facility at Anaheim, California, and to the discussions of our findings with you and a member of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented.
The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality.
As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from others.
You should, therefore, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents, nor from taking -ffective corrective action in response to their f'ndings.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
Within the scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to meet NRC requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of-the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection' report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10-da.ys from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for witt..olding; and (b) sub-mit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this RCPS RCPS12 VPB E&I RA/ f R011kr/dm d
JT lins IBarnes UPotapovsf
/3/
5 3/3/82 3/ps2 3p/82 82
-j
,7 v.
e m
t 8204080420 920326 PDR OA999 ENVPACSC hb$g 99900255 PDR
I Pacific Scientific Company 2
office to withhold such information.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.
Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.
This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning-this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Program Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A - Inspection Report No. 99900255/82-01 2.
Appendix B - Inspection Data Sheets (8 pages)
4 Pacific Scientific Company-3 I
- bec:
IE' FILES
'AE00
' NMSS
_ QAB
- NRC:POR-REG. ADMINISTRATORS, I, II, III, IV, V KVSeyfrit,-RIV ASME NBB&PVI 2
f t
t
,f' Y
O
=
J-e a
-m,.,
y+
chn-cg.m -.,
y