ML20050A064
| ML20050A064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/15/1977 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050A063 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-003-77-14, 50-247-77-33, 50-286-77-31, 50-3-77-14, NUDOCS 8203310050 | |
| Download: ML20050A064 (1) | |
Text
'
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 Docket Nos. 50-3, 50-247 and 50-286 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on September 27-29, 1977, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC regulations and the conditions of your Facility
' License Nos. DPR-5, DPR-26 and DPR-64, as indicated below.
Items A and B are categorized as Infractions; Item C as a Deficiency.
A.
Section 5.4.8 of the Environmental Technical Specification Require-ments (ETSR) for Units 1 and 2, and Section 5.4.2 of the ETSR for Unit 3 require in part, that all detailed, written procedures, as they pertain to these ETSR, be reviewed and approved by the Envir-onmental Protection Committee (EPC) and, if they affect plant oper-ations, approved by the plant manager.
Contrary to these requirements, as of September 29, 1977, required procedures, including those for the analysis of air particulates, clams / crabs, fish and soil for Sr-89 and Sr-90 and for the gross beta analysis of aquatic vegetation, clams / crabs and fish were not reviewed and approved by the EPC.
B.
Section 5.4.A of the ETSR for Units 1 and 2, and Section 5.4.1 of the ETSR for Unit 3 require, in part, that the detailed written procedures required for carrying out the ETSR be followed.
Contrary to these requirements, as of September 29, 1977, Procedure NEM-AD-08, Revision 3, Quality Control Program, had not been followed nor implemented, nor had its predecessor, NEM-A-08, Revision 2, Environmental Quality Control Pr.ogram been implemented.
C.
Section 4.2.1.1 and Tables 4.2-1. and 4.2-3 of the ETSR for Unit 3 require, in part, that environmental media be sampled and analyzed at specified locations, frequencies and by specified analyses meet-ing specified minimum sensitivities.
Contrary to these requirements, the specified I-131 analyses for Hudson River aquatic vegetation and for lake aquatic vegetation did not meet the specified minimum sensitivity level of 0.05 pCi/g of wet vegetation.
The reported sensitivity levels since January, 1976 varied from 0.09 - 0.4 pCi/g and larger.
8203310050 771115 DRADOCK05000g