ML20049J632
| ML20049J632 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1976 |
| From: | KAISER ENGINEERING (FORMERLY KAISER ENGINEERS) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20049J631 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-337 NUDOCS 8203180532 | |
| Download: ML20049J632 (100) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,
- - .~ _.
\
d 0FFICIAL USE ONLY b
. t i
p dnocu ,?s a
/s SECIAL liOUIRY E:
\ f.e AIQUAC/ OF IE IthESTICATION 50-358/80-9 AT THE WIIIIAM H. ZIltER NUCl. EAR PChER STATICtl DATE: AUG 7 1981 rs , , ,,, ,,, , ,.~ , . mu.e. .n 4 .
OoCum<nt duom or acoroueteJ en any orner fde system. sus 5eduent to 3CGr00rrate review and'or ACliof' (fle JCCument 't luClect t4 (MedescriteG ;rCvisions. 4 F< rial te;crt su0fnitted f0r rev'ewl8CliCn S. fen:.ng report suomatted for , enlact:en. C. ,lniurmation of OffrC184 toterett. 30 4Ct10n 'tquired. J. _8eturn to CIA in :sscrited time (_e syss. L _aemsn v:a ma.a . TO SE OPcNt3 de A00RES4 *e .NLt. F p reGrocuCrion af a:taCase document ;ermettee. 1 CAUTION beGJ513 for the dr$C10$ wry of the at*JChed dOCbmefit(g)
.*siems we aeseeeu uJ u.4 wasoutn.s. Off'Ce Of In8CeCtor and Auditor.
I OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0~b[ 1 ()'6 Q ? O ) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION EXEMPTION .(b)(.5.)(.7) e2031e0;32einao 0FFICIAL USE ONLY PDR FOIA KAUFMAN81-358 PDR , _. _
, , ,4 _ _ _ _ . . _ _ __
9 ,' ./.
SUMMARY
In December 1980, the Government Accountability Project (GAP) made anegations on behalf of Mr. Thomas Applegate to the effect that (a) potencia11y faulty construction existed at the Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Moscow, Chio, and (b) the NRC failed to properly investigate the faulty construction anegations when they were first brought to the NRC's attention in February 1980 by Mr. Applegate. The Office of Inspector and Auditor (OIA) was directed to investigate GAP's latter allegation, i.e., whether the Office of Inspection and Enforcement (IE), Region III adequately investigated Mr. Applegate's February 1980 anegations. The scope of this report extends neither to the evaluation of other Region III actions relating to Zimmer nor to the question of allegedly faulty construction at Zimmer. During the period December 1980 through February 1981, pertinent current and former Region III personnel were interviewed to identify what was done as a result of the initial anegatiort:: 4da by Applegate. An available documentation relating to IE regional investigative procedures and copies of inspection and investigation reports pertaining to the Zimmer site were reviewed. Review of the material furnished by GAP in December 1980 disclosed that only a limited number of the GAP anegations had been brought to the attention of the Region III IE investigative staff by Applegate in February 1980. Based on interviews conducted at Region III, OIA decernined that the initial investigative effort conducted by Region III had assessed the allegations, had received available naterial, and had initiated an investigation into those anegations that Region III determined to be within the purview of the NRC. Regional personnel advised that the investigative effort was conducted in accordance with IE procedures and that they believed that the report thoroughly documanced discoveries surfaced during the investigation. OIA review of the investigative file disclosed inadequate documentation. For example, the investigative file contains no detailed documentation reflecting the results of interview with Applegate or principal witnesses and no detailed record or copies of the welding documentation reviewed by the investigators with regard to the specific welds alleged to be defective. OIA review of Zimmer welding records revealed that of the three allegedl7 defective welds specificany identified by Applegate in his first allegation, two had been repaired or replaced, one (K-8n) shortly before and the other (RH-42) during the IE investigative affort at the facility. The IE investigative report did not identify the dates on which the welding rework was conducted on weld K-811 or that a nonconfornance report (NR) on K-811 that had iniciany been closed with the notation " accept as is" was later voided and reopened to order the weld cut out. The investigation also failed to determine char veld RH-42 had been cut out and replaced
9
. .n y . o .. . . . .
I: 2 after the initiation of the IE investigation. Interviews of the investigators disclosed that they had no knowledge that welding repair on RH-42 had taken place. In fact none of the welds in question were inspected by the investigative team nor was all pertinent welding documentation reviewed by the investigators.
, Applegate's second original allegation concerning the installation of safety-related pref abricated pipe containing allegedly defective welds was partially substantiated by the IE investigation. This allegation, as it related to improperly " closing out" an NR and installing the pipe, resulted in the region identifying one iten of non-compliance and issuing the licensee an " infraction." However, the IE investigation neither fully investigated nor accurately reported on this aspect of the case. Daring the investigation of this allegation, information was received that the alteration of the NR - which released the spool pieces for installations - was ordered by the Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (CG&E) Quality Assurance (QA) Manager. The IE report only identified this individual as "a CG&E official" - thus obscuring from the reader that this alteration was directed by the licensee's senior official responsible for the implementation of the QA program at Zimmer.
In addition to not reporting this fact, IE did not fully investigate the circumstances surrounding the QA Manager's order. OLA's review of records and interviews of regional personnel did not develop any additional information regarding the third allegation - inadequate pipe flushing procedures - that waa not identified in the II investigation report. One of Applegate's main allegations wAs "that defective welds in safety-related systems have been accepted, among them welds CI 606, ER 42 (sic) and K 811." By virtue of prior IE inspections (Region III reports 78-30 and 79-17), it is clear that Region III was well aware of the chronic and long history of welding problems at Zimmer: specifically, that unacceptable welds in safety-related systems had for all intents and purposes been accepted by both the contractor and, in some cases, the licensee. Based upcn these inspections, Rt tion III required the licensee to rereview radiographs and reports of all welds which had been accepted for turnover prior to operation; this review started in October 1979 and portions of this review are still being studied by Region !!I. Nonetheless, the Region III report found that Applegata's' allegation in this regard was "not substantiated" becausa the welds had not yet received " final acceptance." In fact, Applegate was correen in saying that defective welds in safety-related systems had been accepted. To say that Applegate's allegation was not substantiated appears to be a question of semantics and is not consistent with the facts. In summary the Region III investigstive effort did not adequately pursue all of the allegations in sufficient depth or breadth and lacked adequate documentation. l l l l
,.~
,-7 -..
_.-___,____. . _.__.- ~ . . . . _ . . . . .__ _ . _ - .. ._ 9 i, 3 3ACKGROUND In early December 1980, NRC received a copy of a petition filed with the Office of the Special Counsel of the Merit Systems Protection 3oard by the GAP of the Institute for Policy Studies (not a Governmental agency) on behalf of Thomas W. Applegate. Based upon the allegations in this petition, former NRC Chairman John Ahearne requested by memorandum dated December 15,1980 (Auachment 1), "...that the CIA conduct an investigation into whether the Office of Inspection and Enforcement conducted an adequate investigation of the allegations presented to it by Thomas W. Applegate regarding activities at the William H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station." The Chairman further directed that IE investigate the safety issues raised by the GAP petition. OIA formally received the GAP petition by a transmittal letter dated December 29, 1980, from the Office of the Special Counsel (Attachment 2) . OIA met with GAP representatives on January 9,1981, and on several occasions thereafter, to discuss the allegations at which times additional documentation was provided after NRC agreed to respect the confidentiality of GAP's sources. Because the additional documentation related to safety issues, OIA provided it to IE for its investigation. During these meetings GAP explained that their allegation. should not be construed as personal to Gerald Phillip: rather they were alleging that the NRC_ did not properly address the allegations. DETAILS Review of GAP Material During the period December 30, 1980 through March 4, 1981, CIA reviewed the original petition submitted by GAP to the Office of Special Counsel, held meetings with GAP representatives and obtained additional docu-mentation (including notarized statements and tape recordings) related i to issues identified in the original petition. In addition, other documentation was provided which appeared to pertain to separate allegations of construction irregularities at tha Zimmer site. Much of the information furnished af ter the inicial CIA / GAP meeting contained statements and interviews of individuals which occurred at points in time following the Region III IE invest 1gation of the Applegate allegations. As a result of the document review ic was suspected and later confirmed that many of the allegations described in the petition were, in fact, not brought to the attention of the Region III personnel at the time of the initial
.me wr -
/,
4 investigation (April-May 1980). Ihe GAP petition listing the allegations
'! (pages 13 and 14) which were presented as not being appropriately investigated is included, with enclosures, as Attachment 3.
1 1
- Meeting with Region III Personnel On January 13, 1981, David H. Gamble, John R. Sinclair, and Arthur A.
Schnebelen, Office of Inspector and Auditor, met with the following employees of IE, Region III, at the regional office, Glen Illyn, Illinois:
]
James G. Keppler, Director, Region III i A. Bert Davis, Deputy Director Charles E. Norelius, Assistant to the Director Gerald A. Phillip, Senior Investigator Gaston Fiorelli, Chief, Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Kavin D. Ward, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Support Section #2, Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch The meeting uns held at the request of OIA to inform these Region III !. personnel of the purpose of the OIA investigation being initiated. These employees were informed that the investigation was directed by the Chairman in response to Thomas Applegate's allegations as described in i che CAP petition to the Special Counsel of the Merit Systems Protection
- j. Board. Ihey were informed that OIA was investigating the NRC's handling
; of Applegate's original allegations, to include why certain allegations i allegedly were not addressed by NRO and whether Region III's investigation l adequately dealt with the allegations that were addressed.
j H At this point Mr. Phillip inquired whether :he investigation was not actually an investigation of his conduct. le displayed a copy of a r! draf t of GAP's petition which he said made tumerous allegations against '! hhn by name. Mr. Keppler then inquired e t o whether he should be obtaining lawyers to represent each of his enployees. OIA confirmed that Phillip's name was similarly used in the " final version" of GAP's j petition. OIA indicated to all employees present that they had an j absolute right to have a lawyer present when they were interviewed but that DIA could not advise them whether lawyers were necessary. OIA did i briefly recount that GAP had verbally advised CIA that they considered t
= = . . . - . - . . . .. . :.. . .
j e j . 1 5 their allegations to be more against the NRC than individual employees. OIA repeated that, similarly, the OIA investigation would concentrate on i how the agency handled the matter.
} In response to a question about OIA's ability to investigate a matter j vhich also alleges that the Director of OIA did. not act quickly enough j on the earlier allegations, the group was advised that the Chairman was 1 avere of that aspect of the case.
l i The employees present raised no additional substantive questions. OIA
- asked each to locate any documentation of their activities such as notes which they night have so they could be reviewed during their interviews.
Phillip pointed out that he had destroyed his notes prior to having heard of GAP's petition. Interview of Gerald A. Phillip I Mr. Gerald A. Phillip, Senior Investigator, Region III, IE, NRC, was interviewed on January 14 and 15, 1981, by David Gamble, .'ohn Sinclair, and Arthur Schnabelen, CIA, at the NRC Regional Office, Gl m Ellyn, Illinois. Mr. Phillip began the interview by explaining that his first knowledge of the Thanas Applegate allegations occurred approximately February 23, 1980. Phillip recalled that he was contacted by Bill Ward, Executive Office for Operation Support (200S) IE, during which Ward related that he had received information from one of the Commissioner's offices which had been contacted by Applegate. According to Ward the inforsation related to the iimmer Nuclear Plant site and the initial determination was that there may be some significance to the information. Ward also ,. related that Applegate alleged that there was a possible conspiracy l; between the site contractor and utility to cover up detective welding. j Ward also stated that apparently. Applegate had made previous contacts with the NRC and felt that he as "getting the run-around" because he did not see NRC taking any action. ], 1 Phillip stated that he contacted Applegate the same day and obtained some of the general information concerning Applegate's claims. Phillip also stated that arrangements were made to meet and interview Applegate for more details. Phillip recalled that after talking initially to Applegate, he (Phillip) believed that there was information which appeared l, to be casting a shadow on NRC inspectors. Phillip contacted Ward at NRC j Headquarters in 3ethesda and notified him of this fact. Ward then l informed Phillip that no inspectors should be brought in en the initial
- - phase of the inquiry and if additional personnel were required then Ward 1 would make someone available from Headquarters. Phillip then stated that within the next few days arrangements were made to have another l' investigator from Headquarters meet Phillip in Cincinnati to assist on the interview of Applegate. Ward advised Phillip that he would have 1
l l _
- - . - * ..--n--.. .- . . - . . .
6 Len Williamson meet Phinip in Cincinnati to help with the interview. Phillip explained that the initial plans to interview Applegate were complicated by the fact that Applegate was very cautious in his instruc-tions and guidelines for the meeting. As he recalled Applegate would not provide his address or the address of a neutral meeting place. Applegate had advised Phillip that when he or the NRC investigators arrived in Cincinnati chey should can a specific telephone number for additional instructions. Phinip stated that on March 3 af ter arriving in* Cincinnati, he contacted Applegate at which time Applegate instructed the NRC investigators to meet h a at an address which turned out to be a church parking lot. Phillip explained that he and Winiamson arrived early and eventually were approached by an individual who identified himself as Applegate. After the initial meeting the three of them went to a rooming house that was located approximately one-half block away. Applegate advised Phillip and Williamson that he had received threats as had the landlady at the rooming house. From Phinip's observations it appeared that Applegate rented a room in a house which was owned by a policeman and his wife. Shortly af ter arriving at the house Applegate took off his jacket revealing that he was wearing a firearm. Applegate began by providing some information pertaining to his background. Applegate told Phillip that he had been l employed by a security firm which did work in divorce investigations. Initially he (Applegate) had. been assigned an investigation involving a "pipefitter" at the Zimmer site who had been suspected of " playing around" by his wife. Af ter the divorce-type investigation had been started, Applegate began to discovec information of " time card padding" ! by individuals employed at the Zimmer site. Applegate informed Phillip that his supervisor, Major Cox, contacted the utility company, Cincinnati Gas and Electric (C0&E), to advise them of the discovery. Subsequent to the contact the utility contractad with the security firm for the services of Applegate, provided him with a false identity, and instructed him to look further into the time card padding. Af ter Applegate began l the assignment he began to provide tha utility with weekly reports which confirmed the time card padding and disclosed a degree of collusion between certain pipefitters and security personnel at the site. Applegate explained to Phinip and provided Phinip the opportunity to review security reports which described security guards' permitting pipefitters 1 to leave the site during working hours without " clocking out." Applegate also explained that during the same time frame (December 1979-January l 1980) information began to be developed identifying the illegal sale of firearms at the site. Phillip also indicated that Applegate had surf aced l information disclosing that the site supervisor, Mr. Marshall, utilized site materials and personnel to perform work on his private residence. According to Phillip, Applegate stated that Marshall's acts were dishonest, however, when he (Applegate) brought the information to the attention of CG&E the company refused to take action against Marshall. According to l Applegate the condoning of these type of acts was going to have a =ajor impact on CG&E and, in effect, put them out of business. l l
' -- -r
l
- a -- _ - . , , __ _
1 l 7 4 Applegate continued by explaining some of his concerns to Phillip about potentially faulty welding. Phillip explained that Applegate stated that ' PM was radiographing welds which were questionable. Applegate did not appear to know who was responsible for their instructions: CG&E or
- Kaiser. However, someone had directed FM to go back and "re-examine welds." Applegate informed Phillip that either CG&E or Kaiser ignored a PM's radiographs of the welds because such examinations normally only l.
constituted a visual inspection and not a radiograph. This according to Applegate was done at the direction of Mr. Marshall who instructed FM to
" examine" but not radiograph. Phillip stated that he believed Applegate was referring to a specific shipment of pipe that had been delivered to the site in the fall of 1979 and improperly unloaded (dropped off the truck) without a quality control inspection. Applegate informed Phillip that this incident took place around the time of an NRC hearing on Zimmer. Applegate said that imach controversy was generated at the hearing regarding fuel rods that were allegedly dropped; but in fact it was these pipes - not fuel rods - that were dropped.
j As background, Phillip then provided a brief description of tue supplier, Pullman-Kellogg and the delivery. Phillip stated that Pullman-Kellogg was the supplier (vendor) and therefore was responsible for the Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) work related to the weld and the structure of the pipe. As a normal procedure QC inspections are not done at the site for adequacy of the equipment or the welds. Phillip l further stated that the equipment is inspected only for damage in transit l and inventory purposes during a " receipt inspection" which does not l include either visual or radiography examinations of welds. Phillip said Applegate provided him with three specific examples of
. welds rejected by PM but then approved by Kaiser. Applegate claimed that one was buried in concrete and he felt the utility was not going to do anything to correct it.
t Another area related by Phillip pertained to Applegate's disclosure that there were " problems" with a pipe flushing operations. Apparently , someone had informed Applegate that as a result of banging pipes during l the flushing procedure deleterious substances cane out of the pipes and l the " flushing" failed the test. The individual who observed this problem attempted to resolve it by raising the issue with his supervisor. Applegate claimed that the individual subsequently quit because there ' was no action taken. As the discussion continued Applegate also stated to Phillip that another individual at the site had been keeping a notebook or log on his observations at the site. Anplegate did not identify the individual and could not furnish specific information, such as the content of the log or why the individual was keeping it. Phillip also recalled that Applegate mentioned having been trapped by a fire down in one area of the plant. I l
I i
', 3 3
Applegate then identified an individual by the name of Murray who was employed by CC&E. Phillip stated that according to Applegate, Murray
- l. was "all right" meaning that he would cooperate with NRC. Applegate then l.
l_ proceeded to tell Phillip that he (Applegate) had provided Murray and l' Schwiers, QA Supervisor, information about the alleged defective welding and the specific locations of the welds in question. Phillip believed Applegate said that Schwiers had one weld tested, found it to be defective, and then related that the weld would be fixed. Phillip then stated that Applegate continued the interview by claiming that information was developed pertaining to the time card padding. Phillip further stated that Applegate informed him that CG&E notified the Kaiser Corporation Headquarters in California of the time card
- - cheating. Subsequent to this notification representatives from Kaiser came to the Zimmer site and were informed that evidence was obtained
' that confirmed the time card padding. Applegate also advised Phillip that CG&E told Kaiser that they had an individual working undercover.
Applegate then stated that shortly after this meeting the undercover operation was terminated because of two factors: (1) Kaiser was now aware that someone was undercover for CG&E; and (2) the wife of the subject of the original divorce investigation had made visits to the site and Applegate feared that, if he were observed by her, she might reveal his true identity. Applegate related to Phillip that he had been trying to bring the informa-tion to the attention of NRC because although the time card problem was being addressed no action was being taken about the QC issues. Applegate told Phillip that he originally contacted U.S. Senator John Glenn's office to apprise him of the information and obtain assistance. Senator Glenn's i office provided him with the name of James Cummings, Director, OIA, NRC. Phillip then explained that Applegate claimed he contacted Cummings by telephone and related the information concerning the problems at the Zimmer site. Applegate also related to Phillip that he (Applegate) became frustrated with Cummings as a result of several telephone conversa-tions with Cummings which culminated with Cummings' requesting that Applegate provide "something in writing" compiling the allegations. i Phillip stated that Applegate thought about the request over a weekend and became angry. According to Phillip, Applegate stated that he was t: upset about the request because he (Applegate) had been incurring personal expenditures to bring the information to someone's attention and now he was requested to do more. Applegate said he then called Chairman Ahearne's office who apparently referred the matter to IE. Phillip stated that Applegate stated that he provided the same information to the Cincinnati office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F3I) . Phillip explained to Applegate that the type of allegations brought to the attention of the FBI were items not within the jurisdiction of NRC and would not be addressed during an NRC investigation. Phillip also advised Applegate that allegations of criminal activity at the site
;I 1
* * * *
- w. .
_m _ __
_7 _ __ _ _ _ , . __.., ,
^
i 1 o 9 r would have to be handled by the appropriate agency. Phillip said he explained that the ' cost of construction (i.e. , cost overruns) also was
- not a matter within NRC jurisdiction. Phillip explained that Applegate was nct happy with his (Phillip's) explanation regarding the NRC's position but Applegate did not challenge the response, d
Phillip stated that the only other remarks made by Applegate related to a variety of problems which allegedly indicated that there was mis-management and collusion between pipefitters and security personnel. Applegate stated this demonstrated that there was not a proper commitment to building a nuclear plant. Applegate also stated that as a result of his attempting to bring information3o officials of CGE as well as others (NRC, FBI), he had been threatened, run off the road and his landlady had been harrassed and threatened over the telephone. Applegate provided additional information to Phillip in the form of excerpts from audio tapes. According to Applegate the information on the tapes indicated collusion between high level managers of the project. Applegate played portions of tapes for Phillip Wich he (Applegate) believed corroborated his allegations. Phillip said Applegate controlled the recorder and only played selected segments for Phillip - describing the context in which each one occurred., Phillip explained; that Applegate would not release the tapes because he considered them' to be " insurance." Phillip said that many of. the tapes were difficult to understand; in those instances, Applegate interpreted what was being said. Phillip stated that. , based on what he heard on the tapes he did not hear any information which indicated there was scoe type 'of collusion or cover up going on at the Zimmer site. Phillip said that', after Applegate had skipped around { l on the tapes, Applegate confirmed that ha shad played all the important parts. Howour, Phillip did state there was some information on the
- . tapes that identified three specific welds which was detailed enough to 1: check into during an investigation. Phillip stated that in his opinior.
comments like 20 to 30 percent of the welds at the plant are defective were too general and needed more support before they could be investigated. Additional information which Applegate furnished to Phillip related to the manufacture and sale of belt buckles by personnel at the site.
~
Phillip stated that he advised Applegate that, although some of the material used in the manufacturing of belt buckles may be required for l construction purposes, it was a problem which should be addressed by CGE, the licensee, and vos not within NRC's jurisdictional responsibilities. Applegate also provided information about people being fired for time card padding or cheating. As Phillip recalled, however, Applegate did not state that any of the individuals fired as a result of -his investiga-tion into time card cheating were in fact the same individuals who had attempted to raise safety issues. Phillip advised that the only docu-mentation furnished by Applegate during the initial interview were l- reports submitted by the security firm-(Confidential Service) who employed l' Applegate and were under contract to CGE. Phillip said Williamson left
' the interview to photocopy these reports at the Federal Building in
,I li 3 l' _ l t
10 Ciner.nnati. He said Williamson spoke with an F3I agent and obtained a copy of a February 14, 1980, FBI letterhead =amorandum which confirmed that Applegate had spoken with the FBI. The letterhead memorandum also reflected that an Assistant United States Attorney had declined prosecution on the satter. Phillip recalled that he had a subsequent celephone conversation with Applegate on March 4,1980, during which they discussed two points: (1) what would be the best approach in trying to contact the individual who quit over the flushing operation and, (2) to confirm details about an indf.vidual Applegate mentioned previously by the name of Sellers (phonetic). Apparently Sellers was still employed at the site and had been keeping a lis c of defective velds rejected by FM but approved by Kaiser. Phillip sail that he asked Applegate whether Sellers ever shared this list with him as Sellers said he would; Applegate responded negatively. Phillip said he also confirmed which of the Sellers brothers at FM was the one Applegate was referring to. Phillip then stated that, af ter returning to the Region III office and reviewing sema of the material furnished by Applegate, he (Phillip) had a discussion with Chuck Norelius, his supervisor, regarding the allega-tions. Phillip explained that the meeting was held to establish what is: sues were going to be investigated by NRC. Phillip also axplained that he had already sade an initial assessment of tha information and had informed Applegate, in general cerns,* of which allegations were within NRC's jurisdiction. Phillip then stated that he relied on his vast experience with the Commission and his professional experience in judging what issues were going to be investigated. Phillip continued by stating that there were additional discussions with region personnel afiter they determined that the welding allegaticns were going to be investigated. Phillip stated that Kavin Ward, an inspector, had been ansigned to assist hin in the investigation. Phillip said that Bill Ward, IE Headquarters, contacted Phillip on March 13 to apprise him that Applegate had contacted IE Headquarters and informed them that the FM trailer had been broken into and some records were allegedly stolen. Phillip then called Applegate on the same day to obtain specific information regarding the incident. Phillip recalled that Applegate could not provide any information related to specific documentation which may have been taken from the FM trailer. The inter-tew continued with Phillip's explaining that the issues were "scoped" but inicia11y they were probably somewhat general in nature and not very specific. Phillip also stated that the early briefing of Norelius was general, however, he (Phillip) recalled providing all available documents furnished by Applegate for review by Novelius. Phillip then stated there were subsecuent celephone conversations with Applegate af ter Region III sent the latter describing the allegations (issues) and scope of the upcoming Region III investigation. Applegate never indicated during these conversations that ha was not satisfied or that NRC was " limiting" or "too narrculy investigating," the 111egations.
. . - -- - - - .- _ _ ._ _ __ ~ - . -- -.
t 11 i Pertaining to questions about regional procedures and discussion of the initial allegations, Phillip responded by stating there were several discussions with different regional personnel. Phillip stated he had conversations with Messrs. Norelius, Kavin Ward, Vandel (Project Inspector), Danielson (Kavin Ward's supervisor), and perhaps, Fiore111 and Knop. As
- Phillip recalled the discussions were general in nature and not too l
d etailed. Phillip stated that he did not recall discussing the matter with James Keppler, the Regional Director. Phillip did state that Len Willimeson's (assigned from IZ Headquarters) invol,vement was very limited and as a result he was not requested to write or document any l information obtained during the initial Applegate interview, i
' Phillip explained that he did not believe that there was any advanced l
notification made to the N==or site and was about 95 percent certain that it was a "special unannounced investigation." Phillip stated there was no fixed policy on announcing investigations, however, probably most are ttnannounced. Phillip indicated that he did not believe that a licensee could alter " poor performance" rapidly enough to affect investi-l gations. Phillip continued by stating that he and Kavin Ward initially i vent to the Zimmer site and had an entrance interview with Schwiers, the site QA Manager. Phillip was not sure how specifically they identified the allegations to Schweirs; they probably identified them as QA/QC problems without specifying the area of welding. Af ter meeting with . Schwiers they interviewed Alan Sellers, QC Supervisor for PM who stated that he was unaware of any list illustrating welds rejected by PM which were subsequently accepted by Kaiser. As a result Phillip and Ward decided to inspect a representative " system of welds" in order to determine whether or not there was a problem with welds. Phillip recalled that Ward was familiar with welding at the Zimmer site and therefore asked PM to pull radiographs and " reader sheets" to determine how many PM radiograph
; " rejects" were overruled by Kaiser and subsequently approved. Phillip stated approximately 99 weld radiographs were checked and only two were overruled. Phillip explained that in both cases Kavin Ward concurred with Kaiser's interpretation of' the radiograph.
! Concerning the three specific welds alleged to be defective, Phillip stated the radiographs were reviewed by Ward who discovered that problems with the radiographs and/or documentation existed but had been identified in a comprehensive review of PM radiographs conducted by another firm, NES. Ph1111;> advised that Ward could better answer specific questions regarding the welds. 1 ! Phillip then stated that he did not check into the " break in" of the PM trailer and, in fact, did not know if the trailer was broken into or if documents were taken. Phillip noted that the licensee is responsible for maintaining the racerd copies of all documents, so PM's copies were not the official ones. l 1 . t
.-,-e-
, - - - --m.-+e w. _ - - _ __ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
o . I 12 Phillip stated that at that time he also attempted to address the allega-tion involving alleged problems in the " pipe flushing" procedures. Phillip advised that the allegation arose from the initial allegations made by Applegate; however, af ter contacting the individual who had knowledge of the problem Cryner), he (Phillip) was unable to obtain any 4 specific information. The individual did inform Phillip, however, that the " hydro test" was run and the system was modified af ter the test thus
; invalidating the test. This statement resulted in an inspection thich j disclosed that the circumstances, as described by the individual, were ^
factual. Phillip then stated that the " hydro test" was going to be rerun with an inspector present. . Phillip explained that the next allegation which was addressed had to do with the handling of five " spool pieces" (pipe). According to Phillip, at the time that he and Ward arrived on site these pieces of pipe were j in a " hold status," however, they were not " tagged" as such. *he spools were shipped by the vendor, Pullman-Kellogg, and were " unloaded" at the site by " dropping them of f the truck onto the ground." Phillip stated the pipe was approximately 12 inches in diameter and over a half-inch in wall thickness. Ragarding the radiographing of the pipe, Phillip explained that the pipe was radiographed by PM for "information purposes" and not as part of a regulatory requirement or appropriate test procedure. Phillip stated that CG&E and/or Kaiser were therefore committing to
. radiographs and documentation as it related to the condition of the pipe when a visual inspection would have been suf ficient. M11111p noted that PM found " rejectable indications;" they did not actually reject the pipe because only Kaiser could accept or reject. Subsequently, an NR was issued and ultimately an NR was improperly written which resulted in some of the pipe being released from the warehouse and installed.
However, one remaining NR was written which still kept the problems with the pipe as an open item of nonconformance. Therefore, Phillip did not believe there was any type of cover-up; he saf f that Kaiser, by installing the pipe at this point, was assuming the risk that the pipe might later be found to be unacceptable. Phillip then stated that none of the j i. individuals interviewed believed, that there was a " hardware problem," only a " paperwork problem." Phillip continued by stating that apparently the QA Su'pervisor, Schwiers told someone to "line through" and void the NR. Phillip stated he interviewed Schwiers regarding the alleged instruction at which tLae Schwiers denied giving anyone instructions to line through items identified on an NR. Phillip concluded this portion of the interview by stating that he did not take any sworn statements or write reports of interviews and did not believe it was necessary. ,{ i Phillip continued by explaining that, even after he left the Zimmer site j he thought that maybe all the work had not been done - although he had
; told CG&E that there was one item of noncompliance. Af ter returning to Region III Rtillip discussed the results of the investigation with Norelius and also told Norelius that he had some concerns and believed
13 that more work was going to have to be done. Phillip then stated that he returned to the site several weeks later with another NRC inspector. Tom 7andel, to make further inquiries regarding the spools. Phillip stated that the pipe was checked and they concentrated on the " paperwork p roblem." Phillip recalled that he received a call during the first day or so of the investigation from another investigator in Region III Jim Foster, who advised that Applegate had called the Region and explained that he (Applegate) was contemplating going to the PM people and possibly the newspapers. This occurred about April 7,1980, according to Phillip. Phillip then stated that he contacted App' legate and told him that he was free to go to the press, however, it eliminated any chance of Applegate's maintaining his confidentiality. Phillip believed that Applegate did then go to the press, probably the Chicago Sun Times. In response to a question regarding procedures for identifying individuals contacted and reported in IE investigations, Phillip stated that the procedures do call for making an identification key. Phillip then stated that there was no identification key for his investigation. Phillip said that he made one attempt to contact an individual named "Johan" who Applegate claimed uns keeping some type of journal. Phillip said Resident Inspector Daniels unsuccessfully tried to locate Johan through the Zimmer switchboard. Phillip said he did not pursue the matter further because Applegate did not supply any specifics of what the journal contained. Phillip continued by amplaining that shortly af ter Applegate " vent public" a reporter from Channel 9, Cincinnati, contacted him to obtain infonnation about the investigation. The reporter asked if he could interview Phillip on the site or at the gate. Phillip had a discussion with Schwiers, QA Manager, CC&E, who stated that they would permit Channel 9 to come on the Zimmer site for an interview in Resident Inspector, Daniels' of fice. Sometime later, Mr. Alteeuehle, CC&E public relations officer, asked Phillip if he would attend a press conf erence downtown. This apparently was done to provide the other representatives of the media an opportunity to learn about the results of the investigation at the site and not just provide a story for one station (Channel 9) . Phillip then explained he went to the Resident Inspector's trailer and was interviewed by Channel 9. Later the same day he (Phillip) vent to downtown Cincinnati to attend the press conference. Approximately 20-25 reporters were in attendance and -de two main points of interest were the welds on the pipe spool pieces which he stated were "OK" and that the licensee was going to be cited for an item of noncompliance relating to records and violating " hold" procedures. As Phillip recalled, one reporter asked about drugs and alcohol on the site and the fact that workers were coming to work drunk or intoxicated. Phillip replied to i r - . _ - - . -- _ 4,.- -c.
o . 14 the question by explaining he did not know of the allegation, as stated. When asked whether NRC was concerned about this, Phillip replied that it was the employer's concern because, even if a drunk welder made a bad weld, the licensee's QC inspection program was designed to catch f aulty workmanship. Phillip stated that Mr. Borgmann 7.P. of Engineering, CG&E, and Mr. Altenuehle were also present* in the press conference. Phillip explained that on May 7,1980, he had several different telephone conversations with Applegate, 3111 Ward (IE Headquarters), and Rica Giordano (ceporter for the Cincinnact Inquirer) . Apparently Applegate had new information (tapes) which he claimed indicated that CC&E had lied to NRC and that there was a criminal conspiracy. According to Phillip he contacted Applegate who explained that he had evidence in the form of taped conversations with individuals which showed there was a conspiracy on the part of the licensee and Kaiser to prevent FM from disclosing defective welding at the plant. Phillip stated that he decided that if Applegate, in f act, i had this type of information it would be better to interview Applegate at an FBI office. This apparently was concurred in by Bill Ward and Norelius. Phillip explained that he then talked with Jim Donahue, + Region III's Chief of Safeguards and requested that he make arrangements for an interview date. Donahue then contacted Special Agent Robert Buckley, Atomic Energy Desk, Chicago Field Office FBI. Phillip stated that the interview took place in the Dirckson Federal Building in downtown Chicago at which time Applegate presented the " capes" and made his allegations. After listening to the tapes Buckley advised Applegate that he did not hear anything which constituted a violation of the Federal criminal statutes. The taped coaversations were made by Applegate of telephone conversations he had with representatives of FM, including the president of the company, Mr. A1 dredge. Phillip then stated that Applegate was not satisfied with the results of the interview and the fact that the FBI did not accept his (Applegate's) claim that the capes were evidence of criminality. Phillip also stated that Applegate was complaining of not having aay maney or transportation to the airport for his return flight to Cincinnati and requested FBI or NRC transportation. Phillip stated Applegate's request was denied. At the close of the interview Buckley advised Applegate that the NRC would provide him with any additional information obtained and a copy of the NRC report when the NRC investigation was concluded. Phillip also told Applegate that he would further review the taped conversations (which [ Applegate provided) and interview A1 dredge. Later the same day Phillip explained he was called by a reporter, Rica Giordano, wanting to know what happened at the seecing with the FBI. Phillip stated he provided Giordano basically the same information described above. Phillip went on to explain that he then made attempts to contact A1 dredge and eventually interviewed his on May 20, 1980. The next contact with Applegate case on June 7,1980, at which time Applegate stated to Phillip that he (Applegate) was "not sitting still." Phillip 1
= ,
15 advised Applegate that a report would be coming out and NRC would provide him a copy. In response to questions about welding problems at the l'immer site which were described in Applegate's " Confidential Report" compiled during his contract assignment at the site Phillip provided the following responses. Phillip explained there were individuals named in Applegate's reports who may have had knowledge of the welding problems; however, Phillip did , not believe that it would have been fruitful to " track people down to obtain w=1d information" because Region III was already aware of welding difficulties acd numerous NRC inspections had been conducted. Phillip added that the specific welds in question could be checked by reviewing radiographs. Phillip also noted that individual welders would not be in a position to know what subsequent actions were or were not taken to correct deficient welds. Phillip was then provided an opportunity to review the list of allegations described in the petition to the Special Counsel. Upon reviewing the allegations Phillip provided a response to each allegation identifying allegations which had been previously addressed during either his investi-64 tion or other Region III efforts and those which appeared to be new allegations. Phillip said there was no arplicit EE policy on how to write the " details" section of investigative reports. He said the investigator uses his discretion to prepare the report in the way which best presents the l information to the reader. Phillip said that although sometimes the report is a series of interviews, he of ten feels it is better to organize the report by subject matter. He said that, when this is done, there are no documents which comprehensively sunmarize what each witness stated: the report presents what each witness said (identifying them
' only by title) on each issue. Phillip further stated that he believed that investigations of allegations are best reported as follows: (1) state the allegation; (2) List details provided by the alleger; (3) state the finding;; and (4) List details supporting the findings.
Phillip said he did not take any writ:en statements in this case. He said it is up to each investigator's discretion to decide when to have a witness or alleger sign a statement. Phillip recalled only one occasion i when he asked an alleger to sign a statement containing his allegations, i Phillip doubted that this approach would help pin down the allegations l, or help the allegers be more accurate. Phillip said that he generally does not obtain statements from any witnesses unless he feels he will be ! receiving conflicting significant information. Phillip said the only time the thought even entered his mind was in connection with the circumstances
- of the notation being crossed off the nonconformance report which allowed i the five spool pieces to be installed. Phillip noted however that the
. consensus, which he believed also included Norelius' view, was that this ll crossing off was not that significant because the problem was still identified in the system; therefore it turned out that statements were not needed. .
M
.. s . . . s -. ..--. ._ . . _ . . .. - . .
16 Phillip said that having IE investigators administer oaths to witnesses is a relatively new idea. He said that oaths are a useful tool, however they are not appropriate for use in every situation. Phillip said oaths have been used only sparingly. Phillip noted that IE investigators do not have general authority to administer oaths. He said that investigators must receive a written delegation of authority to administer oaths in each case from the Regional Director and the delegation must receive the advance concurrence of the Office of the Executive Legal Director in Headquarters. Phillip believed this was a rather cumbersome approval process if it is really intended that they use oaths. Phillip also l noted the practical problem that an investigator does not know what the ! situation is until he gets into the field, yet the authority to administer oaths must be requested in advance. Phillip said that the IE Inspectors Manual is a training tool for new personnel. Phillip said he wrote Chapter 3 which addresses investigations. Phillip's attention was directed to paragraph 1 on page 6 which states: Every complaint or allegation received, regardless of the source or the avenue of cammunication involved, must be evaluated and docu-mented. There are instances wherein the complaint or allegation obviously has no substance and it comes from an individual suffering from a mental disorder. Eve in those cases, at least a memo to the files should be prepared documenting the contact, the general content of any communications and the basis for the conclusion that the matter need not be pursued further. Phillip responded that this passage means that investigators cannot dismiss entire contacts without appropriately documenting it; however, it does not require itemization of specific allegations and hcw each one would be handled. Phillip said that people outside the nuclear field generally do not realize the number of checks and balances that exist at nuclear power plants. He said that as an example it would require a lot of collusion to get all the required signatures on a false docume'nt such as an NR. Phillip stated that, although review of documentation is necessary, it is not : ue that IE inspectors limit their inspections to " paper reviews." He said it was more than common for inspectors to look at the hardware itself. He also pointed out that, under the IE modular inspection program, the licensees notify IE of when certain tests and activities are to be performed and IE inspectors then witness them. Phillip said that in this investigation Kavin Ward reviewed radiographs, which Phillip considered to be "hard evidence." Phillip said that IE does not have independent capability to perform its own radiographic testing to double-check the licensee's radiographs. Phillip did not consider this to be a problem because the licensee would not have had tine to substitute radiographs af ter Ward and he had randomly selected the system they intended to review.
- Changes incorporated pursuanc to reinterview on 3/4/81.
17 Interview of Kavin D. Ward On January 27 and 28,1981, Mr. Kavin D. Ward, Inspector, Region III, IE, was interviewed by Arthur Schnebelen, Special Assistant and John Sinclair, Investigator, CIA. Mr. Ward was advised that DIA was reviewing th'a IE investigative effort which was conducted as a result of the allegations raised by Thamas Applegate of construction deficiencies at the Ztemar construction project. Ward stated that the investigation he did with Gerry Phillip regarding ' the Applegate allegations was only one of 52 trips that he made to different sites during 1980. Ward recalled that he was informed of the general allegations by Duane Danielson, Chief, Materials and Process Section and told to discuss his (Ward's) participation in the upcoming investigation with Phillip. Ward stated that most of the specific information regarding the allegations mre discussed on the plane trip and on the vey to the 21maar site in Moscow, Ohio. Ward continued by stating that he could not recall any "real meeting" which may have taken place at the Regional Office for planning purposes and believed that he was involved in only two areas of the investigation. This included the radiographs and testing techniques utilized to test welds at the site and inspection of five pieces of pipe (spools) which had been " dropped" from a truck when they were delivered to the site. As background Ward explained that he had made numerous inspections at the Zimmer site and, in fact, had conducted a " pre-service inspection" which included an independent review of welding. Ward stated that in 1978 he had looked into several " turnover velds" which had been accepted by the licensee. Ward further stated that welds that are " turned over" are considered to be " accepted" welds. Ward stated that at that point NRC would inspect the weld documentation which presumably would no longer have any problems and any discrepancy would have been resolved. Ward continued that after checking and reviewing approximately 40 radiographs l and related documentatica he discovered 17 which exhibited a variety of ' discrepancies. As he recalled there was one item of noncompliance
- . identified which pertained to a violation of the American Society of
' Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code, Section III. Ward stated that a firm by the name of Peabody had been contracted by Kaiser Engineering, Inc. (KEI) to do the radiography work. The problem originally identified by Ward regarding the radiographs indicated there may have been a problem with the quality of Peabody's radiography program. However, Ward continued by explaining that on a recent inspection at the site (January 1981) he discovered a sLailar problem with the radiography being performed by a new firm, NES. The inspection included the review of 20 radiograph packages that had been accepted, illustrating that welds were satisfactory. Ward's inspection disclosed that four of the radiograph packages contained discrepancies. Based on this he notified the licenses that discrepancies still existed in the radiography program.
,-m .
, . . - . . _ , , _ ., y,,w , _ ..,u-9 m y ._ , , _ , _,
18 Following a discussion on the information describing three specific welds alleged to be defective by Thomas Applegate, Ward stated that he ' believed the investigation report properly identified the work which was done to resolve the allegation. Ward explained that the report was suf ficiently detailed and probably contained more information than an Inspection Report would. He (Ward) thought Phillip had done a thorough job of reporting the information. Ward stated that the language which indicates there were "some discrepancies" identified pertained to the radiograph review. In fact the information in the report is a result of a review conducted by NES inspectors. Ward stated that ha reviewed documents and radiographs which had already identified " discrepancies." He (Ward) did state that the report language does not address whether or not there were defective velds or improper radiograph techniques / procedures. Concerning the one weld identified as K-811 Ward responded by stating that he did not know the date that the described weld had been replaced (cut out) by a new weld. Ward also indicated that he believed that it probably would have been better to identify, by date, when the weld was replaced in order to respond to the allegation. Ward then volunteered some inf ormation concerning the procedures and pPdlo ,phy of the NRC inspection program. According to Ward when an inspector identifies a " problem" during an inspection and is assured that the problem is documented in the licensees system then IE will
" watch it" until it is resolved. Ward stated the exception to this policy would be if a piece of equipment was going to be installed in an area no longer accessible if construction continued, such as, placed in concrete. Ward explained that "as long as the plant is not operating and the problem has been identified, it is not our position (IE) to tell then (licensen) how to resolve it." Ward was questioned as to whether some time linit would or could be placed on a licenssa to resolve " deficiencies."
U Ward stated that generally no action, in the form of issuing an item of noncompliance, is t,aken until the contractor or licensee has accepted or certified to NRC that all work, inspection and documentation, has been completed and " signed off." Ward also stated in response to questions concerning 1976-1977 velding that still has not been " signed off" that IE will continue to monitor or track the deficiencies until they are resolved. When asked how long that effort (monitoring) would continue he (Ward) stated all the way to the hearings for the Operating License. Ward stated that he could understand how the alleger may have questions about items identified in the investigation report but he explained the report does indicate that the discrepancies which were identified in the report were considered unacceptable and would be checked in the future by the NRC inspection program. Ward explained that the five pieces of pipe (spoolo) which had been
" dropped" of f the back of a truck unloading at the Zimmer site were very l large pieces of pipe and unlikely to be damaged frma rolling off a truck. According to Ward the pipe was about 12" in diameter M
- a
_2- - i 19 and over a half-inch in wall thickness. Ward stated the difficulty with the pipe arose in the instructions given by either Kaiser or CG&E to radiograph the ends of the pipe for possible damage. Ward stated that, because of the type of " cap" which was welded to the ends of the pipe, it was not possible to detensine the conditions of the welds through radiography. Ward then stated that ASTE procedures require that ultrasonic testing be conducted. The proper methods would have been magnetic particle tests or dye penetrant tests. Ward then explained why radio-graphy would not produce the required test results. b Ward stated that he did not recall whether he had reviewed all documentation H related to the welds. Ward was reinterviewed on January 23 in the presence of Gerry Phillip l- and again asked if the weld documentation, including the radiographs, t had been reviewed. Ward could not state categorically that he had I reviewed the radiographs and reader sheets but, after consulting with Phillip, he (Ward) stated that he probably had reviewed the radiographs. Ward reiterated that, because the " final acceptance" had not been made, no further action had to be taken by NRC. Ward and Phillip both explained that it appeared worthwhile to include iaformation in their report i regarding previous inspections and knowledge of NRC about welding documentation problems at ZLamer. Ward stated that Pullman-Kellogg, the pipe manuf acturer, had come to the f Zinmer site to conduct ultrasonic testing on the stipulated pipe spools. t As a result of the tests the welds were determined to be acceptable. In conjunction, Peabody conducted ultrasonic tests and also stated the velds were acceptable. Ward also explained that he had not intended to identify the problems for the licensee. According to Ward that would be doing the licensee's job. Ward also stated that he had been told by his supervisor not to identify problems to CG&E and "not to get in the niddle" during the
, investigation.
Interview of Charles Norelius Charles Norelius, Assistant to the Director, Region III, EE, was interviewed on January 26, 1981, by Arthur Schnebelen, David Gamble, and John Sinclair of OIA. l' l' Norelius recalled that the allegations from Applegate came to Region III l via EE Headquarters. Norelius could not recall exactly how they came in but he believed Applegate originally presented them to OIA. Norelius j- located a reference in the Region III working file on this investigation f' that the allegations were received on February 28, 1980. Norelius could I t . I
20 not remember whether Region III received the allegations by memorandum or by telephone. He said memoranda are usually from either Victor Stallo (Director, IE) or Dudley Thompson (then Executive Officer for Operations Support, lE Headquarters). Norelius said telephone calls from II Headquarters were usually to him. He said Thompson usually made the calls, however, William Ward (Chief, Headquarters Investigations Branch under Thompson) could have called directly. Norelius said Gerald Phillip was his senior investigator and he relied upon Phillip to assign cases to individual investigators. He said that, when he and Phillip discuss case assignments, they usually reserve to Phillip and James Faster (the next most senior investigator) those cases that are more complex or have the potential for note visibility. Norelius could not recall ae what point he and Phillip discussed Applegate's allegations. Norelius said that, although he was " hazy" on this point, somewhere along the line he got the perception that trouble was possible in this case. He was mare he had this perception at least af ter Phillip briefed him about his interview of Applegate. Norelius did recall Phillip's description of his telephone call with Applegate to set up their interview. He remembered Phillip's saying something to the effect of "Here's a guy who claims that there's some sort of thing that sounds significant. He believed there was a cover-up regarding these welds and he has tapes to prove it." Norelius recalled that Phillip's reaction was that, if Applegate really had what he claimed he had, it nay be something significant. Norelius said that based upon that assessment, they moved quickly on this case. Norelius said Investigator Len Williamson (then with IE Headquarters) accompanied Phillip for his interview of Applegate. He acknowledged that Headquarters participation in investigations was unusual but it was done in this case to encourage some interchange between the Region and Headquarters for developmental purposes. Norelius said his file reflects that Phillip and Williamson interviewed Applegate on March 3,1980. On his return Phillip informed Norelius that Applegate did not have everything he initially said he did. Phillip had narrowed the allegations to a few issues. Norelius said that he and Phillip discussed all the allegations, but not at length; he said that the volume of work precludes his covering all the details so he relies heavily on his investigatota - especially the senior investigators like Phillip. Norelius particularly recalled from Phillip's briefing that Applegate's allegations included items such as the fabrication and sale of belt buckles and time card cheating. Norelius did not recall ever seeing Applega te's " confidential" reports. Norelius imagined that Phillip probably would have consulted with Ragional t- construction personnel, such as Caston Fiorelli, about the allegations. Norelius said that he (Norelius) most likely would have brought the
I o . 21 allegations to the attention of Regional Director James Keppler. Nore11us said Keppler meets with Regional management at 3:00 every morning and one of the things he always mentions to Kappler are the important allega-l3 tions that have been received. Norelius said that the importance he attributed to the allegations can be ascertained from the promptness of their response in light of their heavy workload. Morelius further speculated that he probably similarly would have informed Keppler that Phillip's interview of Applegate indicated that the allegations may not be as serious as they originally thought. Nore11us said that, although he did not give particular instructions to Phillip, their general procedure for the handling of allegations involves three parts: (1) interview alleger to determine what is alleged and what is the basis for the allegations; (2) review the allegations to get a clear understanding of wbat is to be investigated and why (this analysis eliminates allegations that are (a) not safety-related or (b) too general to permit investigation); and (3) conduct the subsequent investigation. More11us said there is no IE policy requiring documentation of concerns that are raised by an alleger. He said that, because of their workload, they meet with allegars to clearly define what will or will not be l investigated. Norelius said that for example they routinely inform allegers that NRC is interested in safety-related items but because nuclear power plants are run by privately-owned utilities, allegers should provide information on costs (e.g., overruns) to state regulatory
> agencies. Norelius said that, although IE sometimes investigates harassment of individuals, they normally refer such allegations to the U.S. Department of Labor. Norelius believed that Phillip would have informed Applegate of which of his allegations were within NRC jurisdiction to investigate.
Norelius said that in the last year Region III has been sending letters confirming what would be investigated so there would be no misunderstanding. Norelius showed OIA a letter dated March 11, 1980, from Phillip to Applegate which described the three issues Region III intended to investigate. 1 Nore11us not2d that they received no response from Applegate indicating any criticism of .the intended scope. Norelius said that when addressing allegations the Region normally looks l at problems broadly to assure that they are addressed. He said, however, ! that when a very general allegation is received, e.g., in this case regarding the welding, the Region cannot conduct an in-depth review of a plant's entire (welding) program. To cope with the allegation, they l usually try to pin down specific examples and the decision to broaden the inquiry is based upon what develops. Norelius noted that he discussed the scope of the investigation with Phillip after his first visit to the l site and concluded that additional investigation was needed. I Nore11us recalled that Tom Vandel, who he believed was the Zimmer Project Inspector, accompanied Phillip on one visit and Kavin Ward, one of the Region III nondestructive examination personnel, accompanied him on a later visit. Morelius remembered their speaking of a noncompliance for - the installing pipes that should have been "on hold.* Norelius I 4 i
, _ . - - - - - . . . , - ._ . , , . ----- ~ , - . _ , , - . - - - .
22 recalled discussing with Phillip the significance of this item and whether escalated enforcement action was warranted (Norelius explained that he was the Region III enforcement coordinator). No.elius concluded that this situation did not warrant stronger enforcement action because the pipes were still identified in the plant's system as nonconforming itens. J Norelius recalled an allegation by Applegate after the investigation was underway that there was a cover-up involving PM. Norelius said that Phillip, James Donahue (also with Region III), and an F3I agent interviewed Applegate jointly about this. He understood Applegate played a tape recording for the interviewers and they concluded there was not much of a case. Norelius said he later listened to the same tape and he did not l read the same significance into the conversation that Applegate did. He
; said that the tape was of conversations Applegate had with PM personnel; ; however, Applegate did most of the talking but attributed his statements to the PM personnel.
L Norelius said that he only recalled Region III using NRC's subpoena authority on one occasion. He did not see any need for subpoenas in connection with IE investigations. Norelius said IE investigations are primarily to determine facts regarding compliance with NRC's regulatory requirements; he said the detection of criminal violations, for which he believed subpoenas would be useful, is only a byproduct of 'IE investigations. Norelius said the Region has taken signed unsworn statements from witnesses j for some time. He said this was done before they ever had authority to administer o4 chs and it is still done now even though they can use oaths. Norelius said the decision as to when to use signed, unsworn h statements is lef t to the investigator's discretion. He said that an L example of when they would be used would be when specific details, such as a time sequence, are needed in a witness' own words. Nore11us said oaths are a useful tool, but he would not advocate their use in all investigations. He said that, although oaths have been used more in the preceding six r$ eight months, Region III's normal practice is to not administer oaths. Norelius believed that IZ investigators should be skilled in identifying the potential for criminality in their investigations, but he did not feel it was that necessary for IE investigators to administer oaths because they do not conduct criminal investigations. Norelius felt that oaths would be appropriate if II investigators were receiving conflicting information or were not receiving the whole story. Interview of Caston Fiorelli on January 26, 1981, Caston Fiorelli, Chief Reactor Construction and Engineering Support 3 ranch, Region III, IE, was interviewed by Arthur Schnebelen, em
23 Special Assistant and Investigators David Gamble and John Sinclair, CIA. Prior to any questioning Mr. Fiorelli was advised that OIA was reviewing the IZ investigative effort which was conducted as a result of the allegations raised by Thomas Applegate concerning construction deficiencies at the Zimmer construction project. Fiore111 advised that he had some knowledge of the allegations brought by Applegate and was involved in some portion of the investigation to provide technical support. Fiorelli recalled that Gerry Phillip of the investigative staff has been given the lead on the assignment. He, Fiorelli had been contacted by the investigative staff about providing technical support for Phillip. In this particular investigation Kavin Ward was assigned to assist Phillip because there had been allegations concerning welding and Ward was the person most familiar with welding problems at Zimmer. Fiorelli explained that he could not recall specifically any dates on which briefings or meeting were conducted regarding the allegations, however, he was sure that Phillip had provided him with infor:ation describing Applegate's t role at the site. According to Fiorelli, Phillip stated that Applegate had been hired by CC&E to identify time card falsification which ultimately led to identification of possible safety issues. Fiore111 believed that as the investigation continued at the Zimmer site Phillip had some private conversations and also a group meeting with regional personnel regarding the problems identified at the site. Fiorelli could not recall specifically who attended the meetings, but he was sure that the Region III procedures required that a mesting would have taken place. Fiorelli surmised that it probably would have been ! some time af ter the inspection (investigation) at the site was completed. Fiorelli also stated that individuals who were probably in attendance at regional meetings were Kavin Ward, Harry Danielson, Tom Vandel and Dick Knop. Fiorelli advised that Knop was the section chief responsible for Zimmer. At the conclusion Fiore111 stated that IE investigations are considered a "very sacred activity" and the line groups are very sensitive to avoid any interference with investigative matters, i Interview of Duane H. Danielson On January 23, 1981 Mr. Duane H. Danielson, Chief, Materials and Process Section, Region III, IE, NRC, was interviewed by Arthur Schnebelen l Special Assistant, and John Sinclair, Investigator, OIA. Mr. Danielson t was advised that the purpose of the OIA investigation was to determine the adequacy of an IE investigation which was conducted in 1980 responding to allegations made by Thomas Applegate. l Mr. Danielsen began the interview by explaining that the regional organi-zation structure was such that different branches would provide assistance to the investigative staff during an investigation, depending on the specific area being looked into and what expertise was required. Danielson then stated that during the particular investigation in question one of
24 the members of the team, Kavin Ward, was from his unit. Danielson continued that it was typical for Phillip to come directly to him and request assistance. The situation or allegation generally dictated whether or not there was a need to assign someone to an investigation. Danielson then explained that once someone is assigned to an investigation, there is little further involvement from a management standpoint unless the investigation develops what is considered to be a major problem or finding. In the case of additional problems it would be necessary to have more management meetings among regional personnel. Danielson further explained that usually the investigations and reports are complaced and a copy is sent to his for information and review. Danielson stated the final report does "come across his desk and it is read in a fashion."* Danielson responded to a question concerning directions given to inspectors who are assigned to assist investigators by stating that he instructs his personnel "to not get in the middle" and to only assist the investigator. Danielson also stated that he did not want the inspector making any evaluations. In the case of the stipulated II investigation he (Danielson) 1
' would have advised Ward not to make any evaluations concerning the welding and not to offer any advice to the licensee. Danielson then stated that he believes that NRC should not taka a position during inspections and should not provide instruction to the licensee. Danielson continued by stating as long as NRC is avere that there is a problem and the licensee has been apprised of the deficiency then NRC should monitor the licensees effort until the problem is resolved. In response to questioning, Danielson stated there is no time frame for making a licensee perform corrective work. Danielson stated it could be 30 days to several years. Danielson stated that items discovered to be unacceptable are usually kept as an "open item" by the inspector. Danielsen concluded by stating that he could not furnish any additional information regarding the described investigation.
f
- Changes incorporated pursuant to reinterview on 3/3/31.
Interview of Richard C. Knop On January 23, 1981, Richard C. Knop, Chief, Project Section, Region III, IE, NRC, was interviewed by Arthur Schnebelen, Special Assistant and John Sinclair, Investigator, OIA. Prior to the interview Mr. Knop was advised that the OIA investigation was initiated to determine whether or not an IE investigation conducted by Region III at the Zimmer Nuclear l Station had sufficiently addressed the allegations brought by Ihomas Applegate during early 1980. Mr. Knop stated that he did not believe that he had any involvement in the planning sessions concerning the investigation at 2Suner. Knop then stated that the investigators and the investigative group have the lead in making decisions regarding investigations. Investigative efforts, according to Knop, may touch on or address areas which have been inspected or looked into in the past by IE; therefore, it is necessary to have investigations take the lead and provide more independence. Knop recalled _ y
25 that Phillip informed him (Knop) that Applegate had made several allegations and the investigative effort was going to focus on three of those* allegations. According to Knop this seemed consistent with information that had been received by Phillip. Knop stated that he believed there was an allegation about three defective welds and another allegation concerning five pieces of pipe which were delivered to the Zinner site and dropped from the back of a truck. Knop could not recall the third area which was to be investigated. Knop explained that the main concern of the inspection effort was to identify welds or radiu.raphs that are questionable and determine if there is a system to " track" the deficiencies. Knop also explained that once the deficiencies were identified there would have been no need to pursue the ma?ter further. Knop could not furnish any other information regarding the investigation conducted by Region III.
- Changes incorporated pursuant to reinterview on 8/3/81.
Interview of James F. Donahue James F. Donahue, Chief, Security Section, Safeguards 3 ranch, IE, Region III, was interviewed on January 15, 1981, by Investigators David H. Gamble and John R. Sinclair, OIA. Donahue said his only contact with either Thomas Applegate or Gerald ?hillip's investigation of Applegate's allegations was in concoction with a meeting Donahue set up among himself, Phillip, Applegate, and Robert Buckley (head of the Atomic Energy Desk of the F3I's Chicago office). Donahue b e tieved that Applegate had requested the joint meeting with the F3I based upon certain criminal acts which Applegate believed had been committed by individuals at the Zimmer Nuclear Power Station. Donahue said he was the one who set up the meeting because he was Region III's prime contact with the FBI. Donahue said he accompanied Phillip to the meeting only to introduce everyone and then to observe. Donahue could not recall all the substance of what Applegate related at the meeting. He did recall that Applegate played a cape on a siniature tape recorder - explaining who each speaker was and what they were saying. Donahue said Applegate felt these recordings of conversations that he had had with others provided evidence of some criminal acts. Donahue said Applegate's portion of the conversations struck him as consisting of leading questions. Donahua said Buckley advised that, if there were any Government subsidies involved - either state or Federal, Applegate should pursue his allegations under the provisions of the
" White Collar Crimes Act;" otherwise he did not see any F3I jurisdiction.
Donahue recalled that Buckley further informed Applegata that he did not feel the tapes provided suf ficient evidence to support his allegation of a criminal conspiracy. Donahue believed that Buckley was a bit "mif fed" at NRC for bringing Applegate there; Donahue knew that the seating drew Buckley away from some important work on terrorist activities. Donahue also understood that Suckley had contacted the FBI's Cincinnati office and heard of their earlier contact with Applegata.
26 Donahue said Applegate questioned why Phillip had not talked to more individuals in his investigation. Applegate named several individuals but Donahue could not recall their names. Donahue recalled that Phillip responded that it was unnecessary because ha had resolved the issues. Donahue said it was also clear that Applegate had a hard time accepting the difference between what NRC was responsible for and what he felt NRC should be looking at. Donahua believed that Applegate felt that IE investigators should be criminal investigators who looked at all criminal violations from petty thef ts through false documents. Donahue said Phillip explained to Applegate that NBC had no jurisdiction en natters such as time clock violations and industrial property protection. Donahue said Phillip had to repeat this explanation several times and it was clear from the discussion that this was not the first time Phillip had told Applegate this. Donahue said Applegate felt the Government should have been " beholden to him for providing a great service." He said that, for example, Applegate thought the Government should have paid for his trip from Cincinnati to Chicago and the FBI should have transported him to the airport. Donahue said he has known Phillip a long time, their careers having dovetailed. Donahue had only the highest praise for Phillip's judgment and investigative abilities. Interview of James Keppler On January 29, 1981, Mr. James Keppler, Director, Region III, II, was interviewed by Arthur Schnabelen, Special Assistant and John Sinclair, Investigator, OIA. Mr. Kappler was apprised of the nature of the investigation j and requested to furnish information regarding his role or involvement j in the investigation conducted by Gerald Phillip at the Zinner Nuclear Dover Station during 1980. Mr. Keppler explained that his recollection of the initial investigation was limited. According to Keppler he did not actively participate in the decision-making process as to what information provided by the alleger, Ihomas Applegate, was going to be investigated. Keppler stated that the regional procedures would not normally require a meeting with the investigative staff to determine what allegations would or l would not be addressed. Routinely there is a weekly meeting involving l management and periodically meetings with* personnel involved in various i speciali:ed activities, including investigations, luring which he would receive reports on the status of a particular activity. Ieppler continued by explaining that the decision-making process pertaining to allegations received by the investigative staff would normally only require decisions to be made within the investigative unit and their immediate supervision. d w ee, - ep.+ . 1r-
27 Keppler added that the particular investigation in question and resulting investigative report is fairly typical of how all allegations are investigated and documented by the region. Keppler also stated that he was not sure that allegations or reports would be handled any differently in the future. Keppler then stated that investigations concerning allegations at con-struction sites are different than those relating to facilities which have operating reactors. The distinction is that construction projects have so many sore people involved in various phases of construction at the sites. A problem arises in deciding how much investigative work is required to resolve the allegation and whether the investigative effort is properly scoped. In the investigation in question, Kappler recalled that there was an allegation of construction or craf t personnel reporting to work drunk and drinking on the job. According to Keppler this particular item or allegation was not addressed because it was a general-type allegation and not supported by much in the way of specific information. Keppler then stated that he was not certain that a general allegation such as this would be taken and investigated or investigated in-depth. A problem such as workmen drinking at the site
- is basically a licensee management problem with NRC's interest being in whether or not there was a health and safety impact related to the work. Keppler explained that the purpose of the QA program is to ensure that any unacceptable work does not remain uncorrected. NRC inspects against the QA program to determine if the work is being done correctly.
Keppler also stated that he believed Region III investigative procedures required that an alicger be inf ormed of what allegations or issues were within the jurisdiction of NRC and were going to be investigated. Keppler added that it was also a regional policy to recontact the alleger at the conclusion of the investigative effort to provide him with an explanation of what had been identified or resolved. In some cases i repocts of investigation were sent to the allegers af ter the completion of the work. Mr. Keppler was questioned as to why the investigative ceas did not identify the dates of weld repairs or report descriptions of discrepancies identified in the radiography review. Keppler responded by stating that he was not aware that the welding allegations had not been thoroughly addressed and reported. OIA explained that one of the main issues which the IE investigation was actively pursuing had to do with alleged defective welds being initially accepted by Kaiser. In order to support -hat allegation Applegate provided the identification of three specific welds K811, RH 42, and CT 606. The IE " findings" replied to the stipulated l allegation by stating than one of the welds had been replaced, without mentioning when the correceive work had taken place, and therefore did j not pursue whether or not a defective weld may have been accepted. In j addressing the rwe remaining velds IE explained that "some discrepancies" were identified in the radiography review but decided not to undertake any additional investigative effort. I l _.
.....' .L .- . - . . . . . - . .. ._
2S Keppler explained that he was unaware of the specific allegation as described, however, he would accept OIA's description of the events. Keppler then stated that if the investigation had not given any more response chan that described, by OIA,* then the allegation was not thoroughly addressed. Keppler also stated that he could understand why Applegate or anyone making an allegation would be upset with the results of the investigation and would feel that the issues or concerns were not appropriately addressed. Kappler was advised that it was the lack of documentation which produced questions regarding the adequacy of the investigation. In this particular instance the lack of information in the report combined with limited supporting documentation does not permit anyone reading the report to understand what investigative effort actually took place. Keppler stated that it appeared the report required additional, or at least more specific, information to address the allegation. Keppler concluded by explaining it was his perception that the obvious weakness identified as a result of the OLA effort relateed to the entire Region III investigative program, rather than the performance of individuals. Keppler then stated that apparently he and the regional management had not been reviewing the results of the investigative program to ensure
! that there were clear and complete responses to the allegatioss in the investigation reports.* Following this scacement Kepnier suggested the possibility of additional review of future investigative reports to see if the language clearly answered the question (s) raised. Keppler then stated that one alternative would be to furnish the report to the Public Aff airs Of fice who could review the material from a non-technical perspective l
and see if the language clearly explains what was done. Keppler believed this would increase the region's ability to pr' ovide complete and understandable j responses to allegations. l '
- Changes incorporated pursuant to reinterview on 3/3/81.
Interview of Thomas E. Vandel l Mr. Thomas E. Vandel, Resident Inspector, Wolf Creek Nuclear Site, Wolf Creek, Kansas, was interviewed on February 18, 1981, at the Kansas City l Airport, Kansas City, Missouri, by David Gamble and John Sinclair, Investigators, OIA. Mr. Vandel was advised that the purpose of the l investigation and interview was to decernine what knowledge he had pertaining to allegations raised by Thomas Applegate regarding deficiencies in construe:1on at the William H. Zimeer Nuclear Site, Moscow, Ohio. f Mr. Vandel began the interview by explaining that he had been involved with the Zimmer nuclear construction site for approximately five years. l Vandel also stated that it was the usual policy for a Project Inspector l (PI) to be assigned to a particular facility for only approximately three years. The purpose is to prevent familiarity between NRC inspectors and the licensee and enable a rotation of inspectors. Vandel stated 1 i 1
( 29 i that the reason he had been extended for two additional years wss the request of two supervisors, from Region III Mr. D. W. Hayes and Mr. Dick Knop.
- Vandel also stated that during the period he was PI at Zimmer he had been involved with as many as seven nuclear utilities and inspections at those facilities. Two of the facilities for which he was also the PI was the Midland Nuclear Site and the Clinton Nuclear Site.
i Vandel continued by stating that he did not believe that even at this time there was an NRC resident inspector at the Zimmer site who was responsible for or experienced solely in construction. Vandel stated
' that the first NRC inspector to be assigned at Zimme,r was Tony Daniels, who was responsible for preoperational inspection at the facility.
Vandel also stated that the facility in so close to completion that Daniels would be an appropriate inspec:or to be at the site when they
.j start preoperational testing.
- j Vandel explained that as he recalled there were NRC hearings regarding other allegations at which he testified over a year ago. The hearings dealt with questions regarding the licensing of the project. Also involved in doing some research about allegations, which were raised by intervenor groups, was NRR. Vandel explained there were several issues he could recall which were being addressed by the NRC: (1) cable trays and welding regarding the cable trays; (2) installation of water tight 7
doors and alleged deficiencies; and, (3) water intake structures in the ( plant and rotating screens to bring in river water. Vandel further j stated he believed the allegations were a result of intervenors challenging these particular areas and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board had requested the staff, both NRK and IE to investigate and report back to the board. Vandel stated that he remembered the Applegate allegations and briefly l1 could recall what Applegate's role had been at the plant. According to j Vandel, Applegate had been an undercover investigator employed by the i licensee, CG&E at the Zimmer Nuclear Site. Sometime after Applegate ,; left the site and uns no longer' amployed by CC&E, Vandel believes Applegate ,; called the Region III office and made allegations regarding the Zimmer lj site. Vandel stated that he could not remember what the specific allegations ,i were, however, Vandel stated there was one specific area that he was personally involved in regarding the delivery of pipe spools at the site and their subsequent " dropping off a truck." This was the particular l! area, or one of the areas that Gerry Phillip was involved in investigating. Vandel said that Phillip had explained the allegations to him- (Vandel) and he (Vandel) had arranged for Kavin Ward, an NRC Non-Destructive
. Examination Specialist (NDE) to accompany Phillip to the site and sake ! an inspection of the alleged deficiencies. Vandel then stated that he had been involved with some of the initial or original planning of the t
investiga tion. He also stated that he had heard some of the progress as j the investigation uns conducted. Vandel explained that it was obvious t that Kavin Ward should go to the site. Vandel further explained that he personally sade the arrangements. l i l m- - - y - - -
, . . , . . . . . . . . . . . -- . . ~ - -
i 30 - Af ter the initial inspection or investigation at the site Phillip and Vard returned to Region III, at which time Vandel stated that he and others received a briefing concerning information that was discovered. One area that Vandel recalled was the licensee was not clear in its instructions when they requested PM to examine the piping which fell E from the truck. According to Vandel, PM examined the entire pipe including
, prefabricated welding. It us a result of the radiography that questions were raised concerning the pipe. The radiography, as Vandel recalled, caused some problems mainly because radiography was not required for i examination of certain walds. Secondly, FM had conducted radiograph testing of welds which did not have the proper configuration for radiography readings, particularly, radiography c* welds at the pipe . caps (butt welds), Vandel then stated that the licensee sought to resolve the issue by bringing Pullman Power Products, the pipe manuf acturer, to the site.
Sometime af ter it was determined that only ultrasonic testing would be the proper method of testing the pipe, Pullman did come to the site and perform ultrasonic testing which established that there were no defects in the welding. Vandel recalled he accompanied Phillip to the site for a second review of documentation pertaining to the pipe spools. He
- checked records and determined the resolution to be accurate. Vandel then stated that he reviewed specific documents
- nonconformance reports, PM test inspection reports and Pullman examinations which were conducted i
by ultrasonic testing. Vandel explained that at the time he and Phillip were at the site they checked for material control procedures. This a s an area where the licensee received a notice of violation for releasing some pipe spools for installation. Tha specific citation involved the failing to follow a procedure for documenting nonconformance and properly resolving the nonconformance before the installation of the equipment. Vandel stated that he was responsible for initially writing up the items (noncompliances). He recalled that he wrote two separate noncompliances which were subsequently combined into one notice of violation by Chuck Norelius, Region III. This was, according to Vandel, an enforcement or management decision to combine the two noncompliance (infractions) into one and use them as two examples of one violation. Vandel stated it uns his belief that this type of procedure us consistent 'with Region III enforcement practices. Vandel added that he believed there were discussions among personnel involved in the investigation or persons reviewing the investigation. > regarding how to handle the results. Vandel stated that this probably involved hiacelf, Norelius, Ward and Phillip. Vandel also believed that there as one najor meeting relating to the results of the investigation to determine what action was going to be taken. j, According to 7andel, Applegate had made other allegations regarding
; other activities at the Zimmer site. One of these that he could recall i
- f li - ---- . . - . . . . . . .
- - ,, y, -----,. -.mm- ++- -- - - . - - - - c , . - , ,.,.m
em e ! S, ~ .. 31 involved employees removing or stealing materials belonging to CG&E from the site. Another allegation by Applegate involved the fabrication of belt buckles from steel materials located at the site. Vandel also explained that he was of the opinion that the non-safety related allegations were not going to be addressed by NRC and that this uns explained to Applegate. Vandel then stated that he believed that both Phillip and Jim Toster had been familiar with earlier allegations and activities at the Zimmer site and that some of the allegations had been the subject of previous IE investigations. Vandel stated that during the 1973-74 time period there were allegations from a former Kaiser QC inspector that a manuf acturer was supplying poorly or insuf ficiently inspected materials. Vandel continued by stating that he participated in one area of the investigation with Phillip and another inspector by the name of Terry Lee. On a separate earlier allegation Jim Foster investigated allegations regarding deficiencies with the cable trays at the Zimmer site. Vandel explained that he had accompanied Phillip on the second trip to the Zimmer site to address the allegations of the pipe spools because Phillip had returned from the initial investigation at the site and believed there were areas that had not been completely addressed. After discussing the investigation results with Phillip, Vandel agreed he should accompany Phillip back to the site. As stated earlier, Vandel and Phillip were particularly concerned with possible noncompliance in l the material control area. It was a result of the discussions with Phillip that Vandel agreed that they should return to the site and make ! a more thorough investigation into the matter. Vaudel repeated that he l and Phillip only addressed the areas related to the pipe spools and ! material control. Vandel then stated that, during Phillip's first visit to the site, Kavin Ward had looked at the radiography and other nondestruc-
' tive examination areas which also included the pipe spool welds. Vandel then continued by stating that Ward did not look into the control procedures that permitted some sections of pipe to be installed without appropriate procedures. That was the sole purpose for Phillip and he to return to j, the site.
According to Vandel, Ward's efforts to address Applegate's allegations covered one level concerning alleged welding deficiencies. The second trip and investigation at the site was another level, or more closely scrutinized effort. Vandel stated that one particular procedure being checked was the f ailure to kaep identified nonconforming material segregated from material that was ready to be installed. A second procedure that was reviewed allowed the installation of material to be installed in a location as long as it was " tagged" or had proper identifi-cation. Regarding the specific issue of PM's performing radiographs of pipe, Vandel believed it was appropriate for Kaiser to overrule FM's tests. Vandel explained that, if anything, he believed that FM should
- O i !
1 1 32 have been "chastized" for not doing their job properly. Specifically, Vandel stated radiography which was conducted by FM was an improper [ technique for identifying possible deficiencies in the welds. 1 When responding to questions regarding the IE report of investigation j and Vandal's involvement in either reviewing or writing portions of the L report, Vandel stated that Phillip was the author of the section of the report sich incorporated the details. Vandel explained that most of the [j' information and wording in the " Details" section is Phillip's. Vandel i then stated that he did have the opportunity to provide certain informa-j tion which was submitted as drafts. One portion - which was already mentioned - involved the noncompliances regarding the materials. Vandel, j j upon reviewing OIA's copy of the report of investigation, also stated that he believed some of the input in the findings paragraph for allega-p p tion 3 (page 13) also contained his writing. Vandel then explained that d the rest of his information or involvement in the compiling of the 'l report would have been only verbal exchanges with Phillip. I a Vandel continued by stating that on a previous visit to the site a General Mechanical Superintendent for Kaiser had showed him pieces of material that some of the employees had been using to manuf acture belt buckles at the site. Vandel believed the belt buckle material was part of the material which uns used in the rotating screens at the intakes. Vandel then stated that he did not pursue the belt buckle manufacturing because he did not consider it safety-related. Vandel continued by stating that he would have been concerned only if the material had been considered safety-related material which was not replaced. Near the conclusion of the interview Vandel volunteered that during the time of the ASLB hearings which occurred approximately May-July 1979, NRC staff attorney Charles Barth and he met with Mrs. Maggie Erbe from Moscow, Ohio, on a number of concerns. One of the concerns was the
; manufacturing of belt buckles. Vandel had no additional involvement in i the matter other than he heard that Barth subsequently wrote a letter back to Mrs. Erbe regarding the allegation. Vandel then stated that he at one time had a sample of the material which was being used to manufacture the belt buckles.
+
Vandel stated that either prior to or during the investigation he neither met nor talked to Applegate. He stated he knew Applegate had come I forward or volunteered the information to the NRC. In regards to Phillip's 1 contact with Applegate, Vandel understood tnt Phillip had informed Applegate that the IE was not going to investigate other issues raised l by Applegate: specifically, manufacture of belt buckles, time card padding and drinking at the site.
; Regarding the results of the II investigation, Vandel stated that, at some time near the conclusion, Phillip described all of the allegations i to a group at Region III; he believed everyone knew shat items were j going to be included in the investigation and report and what issues or e allegations were not going to be addressed as being of concern to the i NRc.
[ - i i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ . _ _ _ _ ~._ _ _ _ __._ _ __..
33 In response to some questions related to procedures for investigations at construction sites Vandel explained that the inspections and investi-gations are unannounced unless there is a particular reason for advising the licensee, e.g., to coordinate a schedule to view a particular phase of work in progress. Vandel believed that it was the policy that investi-gators initially contact allegers or individuals bringing information to the attention of NRC by telephone to establish a time and schedule for a personal interview to discuss their concerns. Vandel then explained that this is usually done by the investigators who make an effort to contact individuals away from the site. Vandel concluded by stating there are certain occasions when the investigative staf f requests an inspector with engineering background to accompany them on specific cases when they believe the information will be so technical to require someone with technical expertise to assist in the interview of the alleger. Vandel concluded the interview by stating that he could not provide any additional information regarding the Applegate allegations or the investigation conducted at the ?fmmar site. Reinterview of Cerald Phillip and Kavin Ward Gerald Phillip and Kavin Merd were reinterviewed on February 19, 1981, by James Cummings, Arthur Schnebelen, David Gamble, and John Sinclair, OIA. Phillip described the review he and Ward performed of the 99 welds in the core spray system. He said they obtained from document control personnel 99 envelopes which contained the radiographs and " reader sheets" for the welda in this system. They did not review any of the veld packages which contained the detailed weld history for each of the velds, asillip said they did not review all the radiographs either. He said they reviewed all the reader sheets and found two situations where Kaiser accepted welds that FM had considered rejectable. Phillip said that Ward examined the radiographs for these two and agreed with Kaiser's determination. Phillip said they did not look at the radiographs for the others - including the "five to ten" that Kaiser rejected af ter FM had accepted - because their objective in conducting the review was to l, determine (1) the degree of Kaiser's overruling and (2) whether Kaiser's
; overrulings were legitimate.
OIA then addressed page 6 of the EE report which identifies " Allegation 1" as " Defective welds in safety-related systems have been accepted, among them were welds CT-606, ER-42 (sic), and K-811." Phillip was then asked l vhether the alleger actually used the word " accepted" and, if he did, I whether he realized thar " acceptance" connoted particular formal acts by Kaiser? Phillip responded that he believed the alleger said that they l had " bought" bad walds: he did noc recall the alleger's use of the word l, "acc ep t ed ." Ward explained, by way of background, that acceptance of a j weld is demonstrated by Kaiser's approval on the reader sheet. 1 e M t
- O
~ _ _ .
34 i Phillip said that they did not list the history of each of the three , r individual welds in question (page 3 of the IE report) because they were only interested in the final version of each veld. Ward noted that the
- licensee is only required to maintain the final radiograph and reader
- sheet to demonstrate compliance with the code. Ward and Phillip believed 1
they reviewed the radiographs for these three welds. Ward noced that accompanying each of these radiographs was an NES form which stated that it had discrepancies which had yet to be resolved. Phillip and Ward said they did not know whether CY-606 was a safety-related weld, althouqth Ward said he was subsequently infomed that it was. Ward said that just three weeks before this interview he learned l from the licensee that the " discrepancy" with CY-606 was that an improper technique was used when the weld was radiographed: no shims were used under the penetrameter. Ward said that he also just learned that this weld is buried in concrete. Ward said that he la unable to independently i review a radiograph to determine a weld's acceptability Wen an improper radiographic technique ins used. j Phillip uns then asked why the IE repcrt's outline of CY-606 (page 8, para. 4) failed to mention that NES' October 12, 1979, finding of
" discrepancies" followed Kaiser's August 12, 1976, acceptance which overruled the radiographer's August 11, 1976, finding that the veld was rej ectable . Phillip claimed that they did not see the document containing this overruling. Phillip further stated that, %ven if they had learned of the overruling, they would not have made a big point of it. He said that their review of the 99 welds in the core spray system was to provide an indication of the degree of the overruling; therefore, even if they had located this overruling which was in another system, it would not have altered their finding regarding overruling.
6 Phillip and Ward ,ecalled that, when they asked about veld K-811 they were informed that it had been cut out and replaced by K-916. They said that Kaiser furnished them with documentation to this effect, presunably
- the 1979 nonconformance report (NR #E-2138R1) . Phillip and Ward could not explain why a deficiency in a 1977 weld was not documented by a NR until 1979. Ward said that he learned just three weeks before this interview that K-916 has not been radiographed because of water in the line. Ward also said that a Kaiser nondestructive examination supervisor has informed him that K-916 is a class C weld (i.e. , it la not safety-related).
Ward said he was also informed just three weeks before this interview that weld RH-42 had been cut out and replaced by K-261 and K-262. CIA displayed to Phillip and Ward copies of welding records which documented that rework on RH-42 was being conducted at the same time the II investiga-tion sus underway. Phillip expressed surprise and replied that he was not aware of this. Phillip and Ward said that when they reviewed the reader sheet for RH-42 during the period April 7-9, 1980, it reflected } that the weld was acceptable. They said the records contained no indica-l tion that RH-42 had been, or was going to be, cut out and replaced. l Phillip said they did not inform the licensee in advance as to what i
s o o 35 welds wculd be reviewed. Phillip noted thac, inasmuch as Applegate claimed he brought these welds to Schweirs' attention, the licensee may 1 have expected that someone would be reviewing this weld sometime. _ Investigators' Note - After a lunch break the interview was continued with Phillip only. Phillip said he knew from his first visit to Zimmer that the notation on NR#E-1911, Rev. 2 - which was holding up installation of the spool pieces - had been lined out; however, he did not establish who lined it out. Phillip said he also realized on his return to the Regional Office af ter the first visit that Applegate's a116gation was that the spool pieces were bad at the f actory - not that they were damaged when unloaded from the cruck. Phillip said that he discussed the matter with Norelius and, for these and other reasons, they decided that Phillip should do further investigation at Zimmer. Phillip said that the Zimmer personnel knew he was returning because he so informed Schweirs a couple days ahead of time. Phillip said he established that Mr. Oltz, with Kaiser's Document Control Unit, was the one who lined out the NR notation. Phillip could not recall Oltz' excuse, but Olt: did agree that his method of closing the NR by lining it out was incorrect. Phillip said the warehouse san who released the spool pieces based on the altered NR informed him that he was present when Schweirs directed Oles to line out the notation. Phillip said he did not pursue the matter af ter Schweirs denied it because the " bottom line" was that there was no cover-up, as evidenced by the other NR that remained open on the matter. Phillip suspected that this lining out only occurred becausa the Zinner personnel considered it to be only a " paper problem." Phillip said that, in fact, the spool pieces passed ultrasonic casts FM and Pullman-Kellogg* performed between their two visits. Investigators' Note - Toward the and of the interview, Ward returned to advise OIA that he had just learned from len Wood of CGSE chan the three welds are all safety-related. He said K-916 is a class 3 weld and both K-262 and CY-606 are class 1 welds.
- Changes incorporated pursuant to reinterview on S/4/91.
Interview of Everett L. Williamson, Jr. Everect L. Williamson, Jr. , Investigator, Region II, II, was incarviewed at the Washington National Airport, Washington, D.C. , on March 5,1981, by Investigators David Camble and John Sinclair, OIA. Williamson said he participated in an interview of Thomas Applegate which occurred t sometime around March 3,1980. Williamson said that about a week before ! that date his supervisor, William Ward, instructed him to meet Region III Investigator Gerald Phillip in Cincinnati, Ohio, to assist Phillip in an l investigation. Williamson said that Ward informed hLa that Applegate had called NRC; he believed the Headquarters Duty Officer had received and recorded Applegate's call and Ward called Applegata back. Ward said l .
< . - -- - a . . _ . .
1 l 36 Applegate was articulate and seemed to have genuine concerns. Ward said Applegate indicated he had done some undercover work at the Zimmer Nuclear Power Station. Ward gave Williamson the name of a Mr. Upchurch who was with the FBI's Cincinnati office. Williamson understood his purpose was to ob:crve and assist Phillip as a witness; his limited involvement was because Williamson had only been with the NRC for about two months. Williamson said that he called Upchurch and informed him that he would be in town soon and may want to talk to him. He then contacted Phillip regarding travel arrangements. He met Phillip at the Cincinnati airport on Monday morning. They took a rental car to Covington, Kentucky, where they called Applegate from a restaurant. Williamson did not know how nuch previous contact Applegate and Phillip had had. Applegate gave them instructions to meet him in the parking lot of the Church of Christ in Covington. Applegate described how he would be dressed so they could recognize him. 4 Williamson said they met Applegate about 1:00 pm. He described Applegate as a big guy and he was wearing boots, a hat and a "Marlboro jacket." He said Applegate walked them several doors away to his house. When they got inside, Applegate took his jacket off and they observed he was wearing a gun. Applegate then described his role at Zimmer. Williamson said he did not understand many of the technical things that Applegate was describing. He said that Applegate and Phillip did most of the conversing. The only l thing Williamson recalled asking Applegate was biographical data such as his name, address and phone number. Williamson recalled that Applegate said he was hired as a private investigator to investigate time card padding at Zimmer. Williamson recalled three specific issues that Applegate raised: 1) the manufacture and sale of stainless steel belt buckles; 2) the sale of hand guns; and 3) an issue regarding safety-related pipe. Williamson described the third issue as being a situation where pipe was delivered to the Zimmer construction site at night and j then dropped on the ground. Applegate claimed the pipe required 100 l percent radiographic testing af ter being dropped. Williamson was sure there were other issues raised by Applegate but he could not recall l them. Applegate's conversations were interspersed with some of his personal experiences, such as when he allegedly worked undercover to l l help the Drug Enforcement Administration. Williamson believed that 1 Phillip was very meticulous. He said Phillip spent a lot of time with l Applegate and listened to him very carefully. Williamson recalled
- specifically feeling at the eine that Phillip had taken a lot of notes l and had paid a lot of attention to detail.
Williamson recalled listening to some tape recordings which Applegate played. He said the recordings were garbled and therefore hard to understand. He said Applegate apparently wore the recording device as a f
, - w ~- - - ,-- , , - , - , -
2 o . J j 37 body recorder, although Williamson did not believe the recorder was designed for that purpose. Applegate described who was participating in each of the recorded conversations and what was the subject matter of - the conversation. Williamson said that he and Phillip tried to listen to the recordings, but they could not understand the recordings while the recorder was sitting on the table. He said that he and Phillip held l the recorder up to their ears in an attempt to understand what was being s aid . Williamson said that intermittently they could understand some of the conversation but the quality was still poor. L Williamson said Applegate had some documents regarding his work which he obtained from Major Cox, his employer. Williamson said he did not take any notes or retain copies of any of these documents. Williamson said he did get the documents copied and he gave these copies to Phillip. Williamson said that, in order to get the documents copied, Applegate called the FBI's Covinaton office to ask if they would copy them. When they carned Applegate down, they thought the FBI Cincinnati office say be able to help. Williasson said he also figured that he could then talk to Upchurch. Williamson lef t Applegate's residence around 2:00 pm. He got to downtown Cincinnati sometime between 2:30 pm and 2:45 pm. He then went into the Federal Building to see Upchurch. Upchurch recalled having talked with Applegate. Williamson said he was unable to copy Applegate's documents at Upchurch's of fice because the F!I xerox sachine was not working. Wil11 arson believed that he got a copy of an FBI letterhead memorandum f rom Upchurch, although Williamson could act recall how Upchurch sade the copy because the zerox machine was broken. Williamson said he j talked to Upchurch for about ,15 or,20 minutes; this conversation was mostly small talk and not so oAch about Applegate's allegations. Williamson could not ' recall whatner Applegate had come to the FBI or whether someone else had referred' Applegate to them. Williamson then tried to get the documents copied at the US Attorney's office; however, their zerox machine was also broken. Finally, after about 15 minutes cl searching,' WLiliamson found someone in the State Tax [ Assessor's Office who allowed him to copy the' documents. By this time p it was 4:30 pm and, when Williamson returned to his car, he discovered L that his car had been impounded due to a snow emergency. Williamson said he got the car back around 5:00 pm and returned to Applegato's residence by 6:00 pm. Williamson only remained in Applegate's house for about five or 10 minutes because Phillip uns ready to leave. Williamson did not recal1 Phillip's bringing any tape recordings with him. Williamson did not know whether Phillip gave Applegate any breakdown of either the issues he perceived or NRC's jurisdictional limitations. Wil11anson said that he and ?hillip then we' n t to dinner and returned to 1
,their notel. Williamson said ?hillip and he talked about what NRC's L , jurisdiction was en the issues Applegate raised. Williamson said he 1
i I k a
**ea we - * - . . . ., , , ,,.
-- -w,y- - , , , - , - - - - , , - - - , - - - - - , , - - - - - , --, , _ _ , ,_y,., ,w
38 questioned Phillip as to whether NRC had jurisdiction over matters such as 1) management problems, 2) theft of materials from the site, or 3) weapons violations (which Williamson understood to be within the juris-diction. of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms). Williamson recalled Phillip's saying that this was something he had to look over in order to sort out Applegate's concerns. Williamson did not recall Phillip's singling out any issues as to which were or were not NRC concerns. Williamson said that af ter dinner at about 8:00 pm be and Phillip went their separata ways at the motel. Ihe next morning Phillip called Applegate and asked him a few additional questions. Williamson said he was in the same room at the motel during Phillip's telephone call. Williamson said the call lasted about 10 or 15 ninutes. Uilliamson could not recall the substance of the call because much of the technical aspects were foreign to him at the time. Williamson did recall Phillip's going through some of the documents with Applegate. Williamson said that Phillip had reviewed the documents the t.ight before and eiade some notes concerning them. Williamson said Thillip left Cincinnati about 10:00 that morning and he (Williamson) left a few hours later. Williamson recalled talking with Ward upon his return to Headquarters. Ile said he told Ward that the only allegation he saw that was within NRC's jurisdictior. was the issue about the piping being dropped off the t: ruck. Williamson said this conversation only lasted about two or three ninutes. Williamson guessed that his next contact with Phillip was sometime in
- he next two or three weeks. Williamson said he later (in May) received 4 call from a newscaster from Channel 9 in Cincinnati. The newscaster had a copy of Phillip's letter to Applegate describing the issues to be investigated. Williamson recalled speaking with Phillip sometime after being contacted by the newscaster. Williamson said he had no more
- entact with anyone regarding this investigation until the material came sut from the Government Accountability Project. Williamson said he was
' not involved with the writing of the Region III report of investigation. I Re did not feel that he had to write anything nor did he ever feel that he would have any input into th report. i
i
# l 39 Review of Welding Records On February 19, 1981, OIA requested II's senior resident inspector at Zimmer, Toie Daniels, to provide copies of the complete veld packages for welds CY-606, RS-42, and K-811. OIA reviewed these packages and determined, among other things, that each of these welds - at one or more times -
had been accepted by Kaiser. Additionally, subsequent to acceptance two of the welds in question were cut out and replaced. The IE report described the history of weld RH-42 and indicated its current status as being included in an ongoing radiograph review. Contrary to this, OIA learned from the ave 11able veld documentation that on March 21, 1981, Kaiser officials ordered weld RH-42 cut out; by April 14,1981, the weld was removed and Kaiser personnel were working on its replacement. This rework occurred during the period of the IE investigation (the investigators were on site April 7-9 and April 30-May 2,1981) . The IE report stated that weld K-811 was welded on November 9,1977. OIA discovered that this date related to another weld (K-516) and that veld K-811 was actually welded on January 30, 1979. The IE report correctly stated that weld K-811 was cut out and replaced by weld (K-916) in accordance with the disposition specified in NR #E-2138 R1 (Revision 1) ; however, OIA ecmpared the original of this NR stamped l "70ID" with Revision 1 and found three items of note. First, although the original NR identified that both welds (K-811 and K-
$16) had " hold points" scheduled for inspection by the Authori:ed Nuclear Inspector (ANI), Revision 1 of the NR deleted any reference to weld K-5 16. OIA subsequently reviewed the weld package for weld K-516 which disclosed that the inspection documentation (KE-1 form 1A-16922) contained a " waiver" of the hold point by the ANI dated November 9,1977. The initials of the ANI and the disposition of the missed hold point indicate that NR E-2138 may have mistakenly identified the weld as having a missed hold point. 5Iowever, interview of the inspector assigned to review documents disclosed that he believed the information contained on the original NR dated October 11, 1979, was accurate. The inspector also could not explain why the information relating to weld K-516 was deleted from Revision 1 and advised that he had not written (typed) the revision of the NR.
Second, ths original NR carries a disposition of " accept as is" which contradicts Revision l's disposition of " cut out and replace weld." Third Revision 1 was not written by the same inspector as indicated above, yet the inspectors' name and original date are contained on the
* , e 40 revision. This was verified by the former supervisor of Document Control who advised OIA that the procedures, formerly utilized by Kaiser QA, had been to " type" the revised NR wi:h all of the same information (including name of the original inspector) which complaced the top and lef t hand side of the form. Revision 1, therefore, was written sometime after the date of the original and presumably af ter the date of the " voiding" (December la, 1979).- The result of this action, however, gives the appearance that not only did the original inspector vrice che revision, but also that the decision to cut out veld K-811 was eade on October 11, 1979, prior to Applegate's employment at the site, when, in fact, the voiding of the NR and the actual removal and replacement of the weld did not occur until af ter Applegate had been hired and brought information of potential veld defects in specific welds to the attention of CG&E officials.
Copies of NR E2138 and NR E213811 are furnished as Accachments 9 and 3. Below is a brief descripcion of the status of the three alleged defective welds and available information documanced during the course of both the IE and the OIA investigations. WELD CY 606 IE Investigation Report "Regarding veld No. CY-606, a review of records shewed this weld was first radiographed on July 15, 1976, and found to have incomplete fusion and penetration in the areas of 0-13 and 13-16. The areas were repaired and the veld raradiographed on June 3,1977, and found to be acceptable. A review was made of the radiographs for weld quality, techniques and report accuracy by an NES Lavel III radiographer on Oc:ober 12, 1979, as a result of the NRC inspection conducted in 1978. The Level III f ound some discrepancies which have not been resolved and the weld has not received final acceptance." l OIA Review of Welding Documentation A " reconstructed" weld data sheet for this weld was located and bore :he notation " original card lost reconstructed by RT data." QA stamps for instructions 1, 2, 3 and 7 - i.e. , proper procedure, bevels, fit up and final pass - were missing: in place of the QA stamp was a reference to the above-quoted notation. This weld was originally done in mid-1976. The package describes tha history of :his weld as follows: l
.._._,_.f.. .0 . .. l l 41 l 7/16/76 Radiographic Report indicates rejection for Inccmplete Fusion, Undercut 0-13, 13-26 7/16/76 Rework ordered 7/21/76 Additional rework ordered 7/27/76 Radiographic Report indicates rejection for Incomplete Fusion, 0-12, 12-24 7/27/76 Rework ordered 3/2/76 NDE Request to "R.T. Grind out for Information Only" - Form indicates reject on 9/2/76 8/4/76 NDE Request to "P.T. Repair Area to Locate Defect Found by R.T." 8/4/76 Penetrant Inspection Report indicates not accepted because of Crack in Edge of Weld 3/9/76 Radiographic Report indicates rejection for Cracks, Incomplete Fusion 12 8/10/76 Rework ordered S/11/76 Radiographic Report initially indicated rejection for cracks and incomplete fusion in areas 0-12; subsequently overruled by KEI and accepted. 2/15/77 Rework ordered 6/8/77 Radiographic Report indicates acceptance NOTE: IE Report indicated 10/12/79 NES finding of " discrepancies." This NES finding was not in the weld package when reviewed by OIA. The weld package for weld CT-606 is included as Attachment 5.
42 WELD RH-42 IE Investigation Report "Regarding weld No. RH-42, records indicated this weld was first radiographed on August 9,1976, and found to have unacceptable porosity and slag in the aress of 36-48. The areas were repaired l and a reradiograph performed on August 10, 1976, found it to be i acceptable. A review was made of the radiographs for weld quality, I techniques, and report accuracy by an NES Level II radiographer on January 25, 1980, as part of the above mentioned re-review initiated after the 1978-79 NRC inspections. The NES Level II radiographer found some discrepancies which have not been resolved, and the weld has not been given final acceptance." OIA Review of Welding Documentation OIA's review of the weld package revealed that during the period March to Say 1980 weld RH-42 was cut out and replaced by weld RH-K-262. The weld packsge describes the history of this weld as follows: 3/6/76 Initial weld fit-up, etc. , inspected. i 3/9/76 Radiograph revealed unacceptable porosity and slag in the area of 36-48. i 3/10/76 Rework ordered. 3/11/76 Rework accepted by KEI based upon August 10, 1976, reradiograph. 3/21/80 Weld RH-42 ordered cut out. 4/21/80 Rework to reprepare weld area ordered. l 4/23/80 QA verification of proper bevels, etc., for the in process weld based upon April 14, 1980, Liquid Penetrant Test Rapo rt. 4/30/80 QA rejection of proper bevels, etc. 5/1/80 QA reverification of proper bevels, etc. 5/7/80 Radiographic Report and Weld Data Sheet indicate KEI approval. The weld package for veld RH-42 is included as Attachment 6.
.-..t...* .. . . - - . ._. _. . 43 WELD WR-K-811 IE Investigation Report "Regarding weld No. K-811, a review of records showed it was welded on November 9, 1977, but because an Authorized Nuclear Inspector hold point was missed at the fitup, the weld vos cut out and replaced by weld No. K-916. Tne missed hold point was documented by Non-conformance Report (NR) No. E-2138R1. This NR indicates that the disposition was to cut out and replace the weld." OIA Review of Welding Documentation The veld package describes the history of this weld as follows: 1/29/79 Initial veld, fitup, etc. 10/11/79 Handwritten Nonconformance Report dated 10/11/79, No. E-2138. Describes that established ANI hold point was missed. Disposition - Perform RT - Accept on basis of Kr. NR stamped "70ID" dated December 14,1979 (included as Attachment 9) . 10/11/79 Typed Nonconformance Report dated 10.11/79, No. E-2138 R.1. Describes that established ANI hold point vos missed. Disposition - cut out and replace uld. Disposition signed on 1/14/80. 1/18/80 Wald No. K-916 initial weld to replace veld K-811. 1/24/80 Final pass of K-916. The weld package for weld K-811 is included as Attachment 7.
.+.. - ___ ... _ _ _ _ ._._. _ . _ . . _
LIST OF ATTACT!MENTS
- 1. Memo from Ahearne to Cunnaings, dated 12 /15/80.
- 2. Letter from Eastwood (Special Counsel) to Ahearne, dated 12/29/90.
- 3. CAP Petition (Request for Investigation), undated.
- 4. Letter from Keppler to CG&E, dated 7/2/80, transmitting IE Report
#50-358/80-09.
- 5. Weld Package for CT-606.
- 6. Weld Package for RH-42/RH-K-262.
- 7. Weld Package for WR-K-811/WR-K-916.
- 8. Nonconformance Repor: E-2138. Revision 1 (typed version) .
- 9. Nonconf ormance Report E-2138 (handwritten version) .
- 10. IE Inspectors Manual, Chapter 8.
r e
~-
~
/;.0 ,,'e
~ UNITED STATES
" . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMt.*!SSiCN c
,. , t' *i .- wasmucros. o. c. :esss December 15, 1980
%, s f
CHA8 AMAN MEMORANDOM FOR: James J. Cummings, Dire tor, CIA FROM: , John F. Ahearne
SUBJECT:
THOMAS W. APPLEGATE ALLEGATIONS I request th. OIA conduct an investigation into whether the Office of Inspection and Enforcement conducted an adequate inves-tigation of the allegations presented to it by Thomas W. Applegate regarding activities at the William H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station. The I&E findings are set forth in I&E Report No. 50-358/80/9 (July 2, 1980). I also wish to advise you that I&E has commenced an investigatien of the safety issues raised at pages 13 and 14 of the pleading which the Government Accountability Project of the Institute for Policies Studies recently filed with the Merit Systems Protection ! Board. cca Victor Stallo, IE
, a J
-9/ /,2 05 o zo.c 7 .
? AWACHME'4T i g em* eumsuuume' * *
- _ ese enes aus-*euse e = =+e e ew *w O_ * * +w* Wm*- p- -.e
*131mLWA Tau, RN ? Office of the Special Counsel 1717 H Street. N.W.
Washington. D.C. t0419 Mcccrable John Ahearna k..ne . ,;. :: b04d Chair:an ik: clear Regulaccq Cccc:issicu 1717 H Street, N.W. Washingten, D.C. 20419
Dear !t. Ahearne:
The enclosed informaticn is c nnettted y.:rsuant to the previsiens of 5 U.S.C.1206(b)(2). As you are aware, dat provisicn of law rec [uires de Soecial C:runse.l. to c me e to the appuoysiate agecy head inrc:r:natien re'ceived by de Office which de discloser reascnably believes evideces a violation of law, rule, ce regulaticn, cr
=ismanagment, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authcrity, cr a substantial and specific dange to public haald ce safeg.
It is alleged by de criginal scurce cf the inft:rmaticn, Mr. Ihcznas W. Acplegate, and his recrasentative, de Cch. =nc Acccuntability Project, that the infer =atim cenceabg de cendt.:ct and results of an investigaticn by the Naclear Rag" Tac ~y C=:missica at de 74 - Wclear ? car Facility at M: scow, Chio in Iday and June 1980 and other infccmaticn ec:ncesing activities and incidents at de Fardi*g conscucticn site disclosed to this Office censti=te all of the types of infer nation required to be ennected under 5 U.S.C.1206(b)(2) . So-e4#de=117, it is alleged that: (1) de NRC chose to exclude fr:xn de secpe of the investigacicn sericus issues becught to its attancien which the NRC had a statuccry respcnsibilit7 to investigate; (2) the ! issues accepted fer investigaticn were not investigated dercughly ce l in keeping wid scund d.nvesH 3=Hva peacedures ce tactmiques; and (3) the investigative conclusicas were i= accurate and inccr:clete. It is
.h alleged that, because the i=vestigaticn-was c=nducted4n a . - - - -
l shallow and id+ ad ::nnner, it allowed the centinuation of nunercus
*rengfal situaticms acci activities at the 25w facility, including, areng othes: (1) seicus faults in key safen systac:s; (2) an I
ineffective quality assurance program, due in part to malfeasance by the '"-d"ty c::=cany and its centracter; (3) inadequate fire detec~dcn and extinguishing systems; (4) pace sec:. -ity mesasures; (5) presence of illegal firear=s; (6) drunkenness amcng e=21cyees; and (7) deft of matedals; shich taken tegecher may pose a substantial dange to public heald er safen. We recognize dat all of de matters disclosed to dd.s Office =ay
.g not be ui hin da jt=isdictim of de NRC'. Neverd eless, .e are
'( trmedg ali af de infer:nti=n received in crde to provide de full centext of da allegaticns %hich appear to be widdn de pu::-riev of de NRC.
y __ h/--j-[7<$ 2 ,/ j ATTACHMENT 2
.. .. - =- - . . . -. - ~. . - . . . - -
o , J I requase that your report be trans::rf.tted to dis Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C.1206(b) U) no later than six:7 days from the date of your receipt of this lat:ar. Please cita emcrol number 10-1-70041. We note, it is our procedure to ::mincain a public file of agec7 repce:s received under S U.S.C.1206(b) G). 2mrafare, unless yuz provde sma reasm Mty your report or parts thereof should not be released, w will 4 cit v4- de reper ir. full in the public file. Fce furthe information concerning &is matter, please call ma ce James Sugiyama of my staff. M7 telephcca numbe is 633-7107, and W. Sugiyama's is 653-7140. Sinces.17, 7Mary Wtwod x* Acting Special C:unsel 22 closure , u l
t e
' .v
-m a 3c.e C'4.e. . ar. C ...
. ev eC.e. Cv . .d.e. s.er-.*n_m
. wt.m...S; . w.e . e.r MERIC SUSTIMS PSCTICTION 3 CARD RIQUISC FCR AN INVISTIGATION PURSUANT "C 5 USC 51206 (b) (7)
On behalf of Mr. Thomas W. Applegate, the Gover= ment Accountability Project of the Institute for Policy Studies ( " G AP " ) submits the following discicsure pursuant c 5 CSC 51206 (b) (2) . Mr. Applegate charges NRC investiga:cr Gerald Phillip with violations of law; mismanagemen as defined in 3 CIR 1250. 3 (e) ; abuse of authcrity as defined in 5 CFR 1250.3 (f) ; perpetuating gross waste as defined in 5 CFR 1250.2 (d) ; and perpetuating a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. Mr. Applegate requests tha: the Special Counsel order a response from NRC Chairman Ahearne, as provided by 5 USC 51206 (h) (7) .
~S More specifically, Mr. Applegate charges tha: the NRC
- i. failed to perform a thorough and complete investigation of serious allegations he made :c the Ccmmission abou: the Zimmer Nuclear ?cwer Facility in Moscow, Ohio. .tr.Applega:e disclosed well-documented instances of thef: and black-market smuggling opera'tions at the plant; auctions of "het weapons"; illegal shadcw businesses that operated out of the plant to manufacture belt buckles wi:h nuclear grade steel; widescale drunkenness Emong enplcyees at the plant; sericus safety defects, including faulty welds
- on 20% of the prefabricated piping in the plant; and l coercion and retaliation against the quality control radicgraphers who unccvered safety defects.
Unfortunately, Report Nc. 50-358/30-09, en the Zi=mer Nuclear ?cwer Station, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Inforce=en for Region :::, (Final Review, July 3, 19 8 01 ("NRC Xepcrt, attached as Exhibi: 1) reflects an investigation conducted and reported '- = wrcngful and capricicus manner. Mr. Applega:e charges tha: the NRC investiga:ica reflects neither the secpe of his allegations nor the secpe of NRC jurisdiction. Mr. Phillip restricted his investiga:ica to a superficial review of three specific i pipes. As a resule, the citizens cf Chic remain as vulnerable tc a grossly =ismanaged, dangercus plant as : hey were before
.g.? ne NRC eficrz.
M
. 3, - Q7
- y y
'l' .s-
^ ATTACHMENT 3
, , . , , . - - - - - . - ,,, n, . , , , , - - --._
3AC** G?.C CND , In Cece=ber 1979 Cincinnati Gas and Ilec.ric (CG&I) hired ! private investiga::: Chemas Applegate as an unds:: ver agent.
- 2. 4 z a. s s 4 .,. . e.,,. . , ,. ,.- .- .- 4 - .e,a -. . a e . . e .. .a.. -- e,_. -. . . . e 4,
s..-a.- .s 24 .
=edia se itees, was : invas:1, ate "a.v. =c s s ib :.li:v. O f =is -
. ~ '- .e ~. ~..s .--~~ . '.. .. c '-
.c ..s.n n. ~ . . ".e f- a-~. ' a..v. c ..e ...vc _ v s^ . .
th.e Si==er Nuc'.ea: ? wer statice.* (See :ecamber 5, '379 - let s f::= cavid A1:n=ushie : Major""Tx, a:: ached as
~ x."..*.* '
- 1 .o'
. u..' s s ~re e. ' ' * - as s ' , .me.. . ua s .~., ~. ". .a .' .~. ev ' ' s... s
- a .4.e-,s.e3
-- . . .4. , wy . . . .- - 3 4 .,. ,= e .,.y. ... ,.
, ,. ,,s .
- 2- , 3 . e.
early January 1330, Applaga:s wc:kad under: ver is a *: s:
, , . . u. _. .4 .,.
. . , ,,g.4 . a g ,. . u.s s .' . e . =.e was l' S.o 4 ed, W.- ., u , .5 5.'s -.ve
. .. , .0 . a= ".seiv ,
. 5. .- . ".", . . . u .
- w. e :. ' a.. . a.. d. .0 . ,a,are .
.. .- s . .. .. .. . c . 4 .. .. s ..e e .s a,v.a 4 . s _. ..u.e ... n s . ...,._4....... .. ..ac. u..e--
i by Kaiser Ingineering Internazi:nal (KI-*) . (See June 5, 1330 Affidavi: cf Thc=as App'.egate at 7-3, a:: ached as IxhiM.: 3.) His pratax: aisc enablad hi: := speak with perscene'. f::= al'. Levels of size : =s ruction and nanage=en:. Sef::e '.:ng, u..e u..ad ,.a.4. e,,a. u.e --.. .a4.ae . .. e...a uc
. u.
...,4
... n , aa.4 w. . . . .a a..s-
. plan e=picyees. (See :eners'.1v Mr. App'.egate's C nfidentia'
.S.e ,e - .s . . ".a u- v., a .ac..ed a s E x .'.' .". _i . .*,. )
~
. In four weeks A=.c'.aqa:n.d cumented a scheme .
f *.abc:- s.
... a..a ge ' e .' . . O i
- s .' ~.. ..
- , e.~. _' . a..d. . . ve.- 4
---' ' a c, a ' , '
.a.3e.-
. us v,
. .,,., --3 .. .... u.ej.3y4. - . -. . . . , f-3...
-- . , , .. 3 e . . . ,.
. . . . . . 33 v .,. . . , <
'.a..ge-,.us.'v. .' au.' .v. w e ' 's .' .. %. e v. e .' .'..e. . .'..d',.a.'ve
. a u
-- ,3_ a. y.. 4. ..
3 3...v. -. a s s" = .~.. s s' * *.a' " ) ~. r a c . ' .. = s . ' .' ' ' .'d."-- - = v. , his contact in CG&I =anage=en: was pisased abce: -he evidsnce a a .4 , ..u. , , - 4 ., ,. , u. g . -,....,z 4- .4,, e .a 33a,.y.
. .,,a.4s...y. . -- .. , 'e #ec. .s a..d ~. t'".s' ~.. "v. .w - - ~~- . . ..s . e a d , .v. . .v." - a v. -- e ed d -
M.r. A:c.ieea e :: ::c: cc: any reasca :: fire Psabcdv. Mac.na f'.ux e - - . .-..t.'..- ( m. . a ) , .3 ,. ... a..v. 7 '-
*v.s /.. a --d ' ..g a .".v. )
, ..uc sa: x for the clan 's :uali . .
- v. assurance ::
. gram. (Af fidavi , a: 4.)
a' rc. .i e ga . a '.. ' ' ..wed .' ..s -" c ..i .- .. s "u . '. .u..d ".a. ..'.e .ad' . -
,ra: hors wars a=cng the res: conscienticus emplev.ees On' the s .' . s . s s e a - ... ~... . .r ' - * . e. .~ ~. n ' ' a d s e . .' ~.t' . . s ~. e ~. .k ' a= s u.. .' 2 . . ,
. s s a 's .v, . e ' a .ad -", , a ' ' .v.
2 4 n . u.e . 3, .. -
-- ......? e. --,.g a=.
When M.:. A:=. Lagare ::assed these saf a:v. :encerns,* his .
,c s ' . .'.~. . a s c-'a ..". . ".de.-~ ve . age.. was .=.....t..a.ad- .= .". . ". e - v. -
s c c.a. a ' .s , 4 .. e ar .'. .r . = . .'.a .. .r . k. e ". ~..'. ' .' .v. '. .' - =.d ~ . e a=., .' .. v. m e s
.a u..e . ad '.. e e .n ~ ' . e .a.. , e . s ~ ' ". .' s . 4 ...e ".. . e = - ' . . ,.' ..". a. s . .i a . .' . . .
- v. =. e s w e . s ~. . c.=. . . '. . .d .. s .. '-
- 3 x
. . .-.- ' ~ u s .' .v , *. = s e s a= a = r .' a.
~ ' "
,,.a 1..4 *.. a d ;. . . "o '. .'. a d .". n' y- y *. =,,,c, a . =.
s a ' s . v. 7.a.
- ..es .=.. r a...
w.' ". ".e a.a ' v. .' s ad s .' . ".. .' s r . .- " e .'.. . . ,,". a ' ' .v. , ~ . . . ~ .. - - . CG&I knew cd these a=picyees' d.issent, because Applaga:e ci:sd
, _,4_- --
.t-, ., 3 4 , . . . s 4 . . u. 3 ... ..a42... --.-=.,c-...
4 .. -
.A .' .= .- .e.ass
'. " ' - ..g s , s.a .~ .' < =u M.
~
. . . a' ~r ' = c. = ~ s ' s v e . ~..~...._*-v... - ..c. a '
. .. s . .,., ., .s ,. .a
.-.g...., . u. e . . 4 ,-----
- 4. , 4 . . s
. . ._ ...., g .. . e .a .4 .- ... .,2e..,...,... ..
. . . aqa .e . s _ . a .. .e--
ar. . - .
- 4. .._. ,
4.. .,.
.-. nyy ...v.,....
- a -- e
..a s . ,. . u...,. s u e e . ..-.,.,....d
.. . .....e-.,s . c s . ..s. ,,n-.
a .a .4 a. .. .-s- ,
a ,
-h at 20-21.) on April 1, 1980, after a mystericus break-in and theft of records from the PM trailer, the utility fired the radiographers, against whom Applaga e had been unable to find any evidence of imp cgriety.
On February 15 1980 Mr. Applegate telephoned the NRC Washington headquarters to disclose the condi:icns he found a Zi=mer. (See Mr. Applegate's telephone records, attached as Exhibit 5.) Simultaneously, he sent his evidence for analysis to Mr. Upchurch of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("F3I") in Cincinnati. Mr. Applegate also p cvided his evidence to Mr. Cissel of the United States A::: ney's office in Chicago. Iach of these offices and agencies assured Mr. Applegate that his charges would be pursued. Those assurances rang h,olicw as time wore on and nothing was done. (Affidavit,
. at 13.)
y mc .e NRC consented to investigate only afterOnApplegate 1980 N_ontacted NRC Chair =an John Ahearne's offi:e.. 2 -icarr-* 'ed by n , ?hillip ::t "' N L % ~~ pplegate'and reviewed sc=e ed his contentions and allegations. The felicw-ing week they informed him tha: the NRC would pursue three limited areas of investiga:icn. The three investigative charges
-s g
included two charges of f aulty welds, as well as an imp cper i i shortcu: in the flushing svstem~ that cleans :he ci=ine.
's / (See March 11, 1980 lette from Phillip to Applega':e,'a:: ached as Exhibi: 5.) The investiga:Or's le :ar neither =entioned the quali:y assurance p 0 gram, nor Mr. Applegate's charges cf mismanagement and criminal activity at the plant.
Correspondingly, his July 1, 1980 report fails := p:cv'.fe an accurate record of the allega:icns. In fact, Mr. Phillip failed to mention the mismanagemen and criminal charges at all. 3y completely omitting the bulk of Mr. Applegate's discicsure, Mr. Phillip limited the pessibility of future review of his exercise cf p ciessional discrecion.- In effect, he also - - precluded referral of those issues to scme other agency for app:cgriate review. Iven for the narrow issues he considered, Mr. Phillip's effort represents the mest shallow level of investiga:ica and documentation. The report effers no cu:line of investigative strategy no sampling cf the criteria by which Phillip made critical judgments en the scope of the p cbe; no list cf documents reviewed or interr: gat ries: and no references to swcrn statements. Mr. Phillip's reyc:: is a disserva:e ::
- ne public and ec Mr. Applegate, who literally risked his life to blow the whistle on :1mpant er ime , dangerous safety flaws, cd@h allegal retalia icn, criminal scams, and wasteful mismanage-
?jgp ment ae the CL=ner plant.
. 1 i
I " ' " " * ' * * *
,g c.- .a.. * ' - - - '
N a-,u .,... __v- t -, a . . . u.,. .,. . . , - ,, - c , o ta. . 3. . a, .s.,. - .sc r,., s P=suant to 5' C5C 5120 6 (b) (2) , the C'fice c' the special C.us e _' . ' s ".a _' ' ,~~ _t 'f s u' = ' * .- ".e a. ,-- ' a .e a , e...v
. . , . . , ".. e ad anv. ind :=ation which the a=.=.lican: ":sasenabiv. believes
- i evidences a "vbla,.ie . of any law, rule :: :squiacice, i mismanagement, g: css' waste cf f=ds, abuse =f autheri:y, c i substantial and spect'ic danger :: public heal:h c s a f a :y . . . .
5 CIR 1252.3 requires tha the agency head ::1:smi: :: de l 3pecial Counsel vidin 60 days the w:'::en rasponse : squired by l 2 uas g _s _.r o e c s ) ( 7 ) . . i l r
'4hile Mr. Applegate is sc: a gcVernmen: ampMyse, the opecial Counsel's policy is := accep: = der 5120 6 (b) ( 7) ncn-
. gcVern=en e=picyee disclosures based n a *:eascnab' a belief. *
*e::s
. from Acting 5pecial Counsel Marv. Ias:vecd := hc=as
. . ey .4 .. ,.., . . . , y, ~2 ,-
go) . n...s ,.- w4, .- 4...,-,.,.3.4-, - . . , . v . . .,-, ., ' aga.s'.1 dischstre is eligible for the special Ocunsel's whistle-
"'.ue '_'sc_'.s~~e .. ..d .'..
The regulations de ac define 'rsasenabis beliaf", l
.w. 3 . 3. dard ' .. c .' w.a . a wi..' s .' eb _' ,.we. . u s sa ._' s 'v. ...
' a discissure. Ve ::::cse tha: Mr. A=. =. legate' .s discus =ss he s
.Ss_Sd .. ae_- _u.e .. ---.,+-Ws_n7 a4_2 4 ..4._. t , ..s e s_ e.Sasc a.w_t5
- - .. ue?a e .a. n
- gp* w.e .g g ., g..g g. . a. ..a t 97 . n.g _ _4 _J .J. .,a.
. . , . .,,..y4.. . _4 ..
a,. u.e .t.e .. .s a._t s c.1 . s L..S , u_ a s e ?,-
. , ,. . _4 2 -
..e ence e .m re sena_? exce _ . e.. . s _. 4 .. 4..,_ a _. _4 ,. n ,a. e 4... e d
..- m ,.ue _ s. <
This key phrase recuires a new defini:icn, because i:
- raditionally =eans de *p cbable cause standard. #:: an l
a.. es . Su . ".e ' a g 4 s ' a - ' ve .". .i s .~. . .r ' ". e .2. e "- - . .', c . . speci'ically rules cut ce ::isinal standard. *he Sena:n - Repc : cn the Act sta:es, " The special C:unsel vculd nce require bfer=atica ascunchy :c 'p::babia cause' :c conduct a an hvastigation." (S. Rep. No. 15-969, 35th Cong., 2d 5ess.
- 32) (.r e e_a..a_.,e
- s. a ens. e Reec , .. ) . . ,.s..;s a
. s...
- .--< n _ts
*:qical. :: wculi be absurd :: expect an emphyee :: muses:
the same deg:se Of precf to de= ens:: ate *:sasenab' a belief
- _
l ! w.a . .e ,c.t.4 e .2s , a_...,.. . 4
.. ..es.4 a.4.,.e gc.u._4 e .y . s = a .w e- .
c show *precabia cause.' If :he CSC : squires a high standard
.~_,~~.c-, .. a.. e. , ' -v. ee w.a.c ac .3 . ' . . ". e , t. '- ' . .'...e as . '..v.
. ... . se __ _z . . c., u. , . en_ta_ .n . g..se as:_y . . g - v.. a .a ' ..c. s w .= .~. '_1 '
n -u, , .a. u e - e ss ec _ag a ..
- , , _., .- a
_.e _ .- _ aa-- . .. -_.. ., e --- . . e .. .s:-_sa 3. . su.
, -w-,cse,,a .e , : : , - s .. .. a._< a 1-
. ,s a- .t 2 2 s _ae_ e .. _ s x. a- . ae.-... s.. . .. s.s
_- i s a a, s ,---_s.
.s_ .-
. . . . . . . .. .. s a . . _a_a_t.a._i ... ..
l 1c: Lng L= seL*-de'ense, *:sascn1ble beLLa!* means ( s' beLisf
.. ,g a _. _. e._. _ v. =..a..-_=.. > ._--
'--"- s.=...as #.2_'__" ..-=.a._...,_., _ = . '. -
hones:17.ents::ained.* .. .. . Heward v. 5:2:e, '13 A11. 32, '. 0 _ . ac. 430-0Q s_J12).
. _. .._ ,,7 v. -.c- , , , , , -
t
. t.
+
r
- e. .g e.
as.
'**N
- cf Cur proposed definition also is consistent with ts sometimes tha: -
the well-defined ters *gcod faith," which the couro " Placer ~ reasonable belief." ! have created as equivalent 553 ?.2d 54,58 (1976); 225, Huesell v. Co. v. Lee, Alaska, 217 (1903). Commonwealth, 25 Ky. Law Rep.262, 75 S.W. l" belief, 3asically, a "gced faith" belief is a "real 594, er actua51 C.A.3d 866 (1975), Raab v. Cooper, 124 Cal. Reptr. 590, d frem a cellet g:cunded in " honesty of purpose" and free omWendling v. Cu fraudulent intent. In admid stra :ve law cases ontounempicyment " genuine." 390 (1977). ccmpensation, "gced faith" is equivaLen: 1 Pa. Unemployment Ccmpensation 3d. of Review v. ?inger, 2The parase is flexib Comwl:n. 61, 342 A.2d 781, 732 (1975). ' and includes " honest mistakes (s)" within its purview.102 Ga. App. .< 106, 11 Edwards-Warren Tire Oc. v. Ceble,- - - S.E.2d 352,-.&5d ti9M >. Che above analysis is persuasive authority for our proposed definition. 3ut since " easonable belief" is new towe examin the administrative law context, definition incer: crates " reasonable" This for each term. Cu and rationally justified." 05 through the phrase " honest h ities and interpretation is consistent with legal auc cr3cuvier's Law Dictionary judicial precedents. " ust; rattenal.'
" reasonable" as inter alta, Black's law Dictienary 203, di 14:n S.W.2d Id.
Law Dictionarv 1022 (1946)). State, 124 Tex. Cr. A. i l; 1968) turnsto to Cass v. define the cer= as "synonc=cus with rat onaBlack's_ cites l 500 (1933) As a :ss: honest; equitable; fair...." h court l decisions to applyInc. thev.term 3 cardin of spec' Review.fir Sureau contexts.ofci whet in Columbus Green Cabs, 134 N.E.2d 257, 262 (1961), explained i - - Unemployment Ena: Compensa :en,"(rj aasonacle the court in Anderson means f air, honest an criteria for appealability in a Co :cre, ._ , Mo. App., 367 S.W.2d
- v. St. Louis-San Francisco Rv."' Reasonable' =eans rational, just, "
T57, 660 (1963), stated, f air-minded, proper, sensible, pechable, sane, =cderate. iction Cur proposed definition interprets " belief" as "cenvce frem perscn the time of disclosure, based on in eren f Cur proposed at horities. experience or information (3d Id.derived 1969)). 3cuvier's frcm others." a (3allantine's Law Dictionary 129 defines " belief" as "(c)cnvictica Of the mind, arising no: frem actual perception c: kncwledge, be; by way of inference,inferm er from evidence received cila '1948)). 31ac!'s Law Dictionarv
,,(C.) (3cuvier's Law Dictionarvin :ne :catext. ci a test ei managementSLR3 crder:
appl:es "telief' h scmething motives in a dispute c be convincedeverNLR3 orcompliance := feel t at?ste 3rcadcastine
- v. withv._an* Oc.,' 3elieve least probable." The court in NLR3 is true or 197, at 203 (5th Cir. 1954).
217 F.2d unds Oc Pace 3rcadcastine Co._ also defined "reascnable gro ,
. . , . - - - - n,., , - , , . - , . - . ~ . . , , - _ - - - - . . , , _ , , , _ , . _ . _ . . , , . , . , . . _ . . . . . ,
5- ' believe" as *:ationally justified beliaf " m censistent with the standard. we have p:cy,cseE~ Id.
, again /
.. . .s g yc . g . .
c . .e e.4*gce. 4 aue,s ean . , . . phrase . d faith, , 3.xge., . there . .u.g.m..e is .. ,kr.ew.'
. e a.i.n a ada.,, ex. e ~s .u.., e 2 a.-a , a a is ' ' a. . ..- .e cur .0:cpesed defini:icn of *:aasonable belief."sistakas ccm for hones:_ a .i.. v. withis .
in *nduser:.ai 5.W.2d 293, 195 Sank (1973), Of Ecus:cn v. ~4viis, As the court
, '"x .'$pp.
verification of affidavits,expla'The nedwc w:.:n :sspec:. Civ. , 493
- the ds is essential fc'kncwiedge' de ac: have de .... same " nea:ning'helieve' and whist
~. n c e . ..s . n.' ".cu a *lebicwers who voice ra:icnal and sincereTh:.s f'.axibi*.
prc: action, . hey =a ax_ .' e 1.1..d ar.'. .~. ~ a ' .'. .'v. .' ..~, ".s~.'..- . because of the pcss:y well checsa
. bili:y of a mistake. ac: :: risk their careers
..<-CLa. mJ C.,...d, a A3CSr r. ., ,
2? 9.ye.n.
.mA . .sIe u e.
4t ..-yC R.. . ., , y . ,, . c
... c.,u nG ., ,I Adu.s w D..,,,,..- 3..C33 .b*ha .=.s.. . t% sine 3 ; 5 5 .:. . ,
,....ew 4" .w , , s.
MQ w. .. -
..A. m. m.. .ue a a...w 3 aa=..,% o. m. - .
.m.
y% 3._ ,.5
.e. m.yye ..,. .. . G&. w . . . .
...A.e..,.
.%r# et .e.n , ,.
w. e.c.". .., 3 .,
.f .. .g . g.f.
. .w b uC*. ..A w w -.4u -43w
.,y. ,y w
.I.EC .76..s u.w n..e..J. . 3 ev...4 g . , .
J b v =S .9
.. .v e s ..d , a ,..~. . .". .' .' .'..d y- sye..
.' =,.v. '. aw ' .7 ".e .~.".a.. ., e s . a .v.c .'a.vs w.' '..v -.
.qu-. '
e .' .. .c A'y~y .' sc. a e ' a' s -u . 35.'- .' .' .' e- s = ad .'a s .'.~.r . s 's' .
" y y .' a c. a .a
. . . w.".a ' . sed. . , .
=.s s " ' ' e. . c3 ... ~ ~. . ~' .a .' .= ~. ..' v .' .v. ,
. . .a c .".a. s ~ _' ' .. .' . e..s .' . . ~, .. r.d .'. ._' ~y,..s,
.". a -", e a _' _' .v.
assur ..ce s _- - -- ._ e a .s .. _".a. ..' 3s. ,
.e. . .o... w4.,4
.=., a..d . .' .m. ..
.aga,.m e
.'....=....'..v.
. .- v" ..s ~~*-
. ye , a z .. 1 s.. g .s . . - - y ' s ~. . ' ..'r .~. . .c .e. .- . .
. .. . g u. s .. ,.,~ y . .n. . ., ..g yz. z wa s. w .' ". s e v =... .=
a r.'a App.'.ega,te a__,ega_.2 ns 's =cn h as a CG&?. spy.
.. . a. .,
a.an > 2ag. . . site:
..e -ou.e sa a ,e
.- He shcwed nc in: eras in
, .s ~..
'.aher and =anagemen:s.. . a - . ,. .
e .. s _ .~ 4.n . . . . , . . . for' personal use; smugglin
..uc.' sa. ., ade .. ..=e fabrica:
.' . e..d
' ice. and sa*.e of bel:di. version of *.
ed .'~ ~.se a. '.e y buck'.as
. made
.' a.. ,. *. e.".
frequer.:g:ime-card and sale padding; of two thcusand pcunds of copper c.- able: an drunkanness cn the size; and n spc::ad fire that system. n short, -he charges illus rattha: de an inef' active alars a _s, cesspeci , 42.) cd misconduct at -he :i=me=. plant.Phillip excluded cavealad (Affidavi: at
-,e ,sa_,
1 a.- .
.e. . e- 3
.u. .-
-v .w .
,eg
.a.
. , . . ., -4
. . .. . s 4 ,.....aa.
. . r... s,. sd .d .s.. . e I
. s. e, n, ~. s. . . :
3.. _. s- .' e. ~.. ..., 2wt. .:4,s e,,. "-. ' . .-- ,d ' ~ 3 ~..-a
.v , '-
. . e.--.,ac .
.de .^. .. =.d ~. v
..c .a...<v.
t
.. a - . . . . . .t C . . , ,. ,
s n L. ., .
.C, .,.:., .3, .
s e .. s ,
.u . a. y a.. .
.. .'. .. _' _' . ar.s .' .~, a..d. . -
sc."_a _... .' u
.ng-s ce=tain -
nuciaar u.e e..~ nacerials and. "ac:.'i iss en .he e... 7< a u.ea, z. a1 s-t .- a, g s n ag-,,, .. . . a.
.. gn. _-s n ,
_2 . a. s-
.ec~4. .s, .: . ,e..e.a.z .w._..,..g',.,._.,.g.~..,
ya_..e... .. .. . 1.g . ~y e.,.a i . . ,. .a 1 ., .. . a. e ,. . . a. --.. . ,.. . 4 ~. .
.c .~. . .'. .=. s f . .
. .........<.1'.~..
\ l C.O 6 a_ . gd .. .p. . .-3 s.
nJ epE. 4 8. N. a
. y... M. /. 5 .
A
o .
._ _ . _ ~ - - - -
7-
.a
(.y
~ fewer: medical therapy, research and testing) ...,
be licensed and regulited by the Cc= mission. 10 CFR 3.4(b). According to the AIA, the Commission's general " authority and responsibility" en: ended :c include regulation of "the constructics and cperation of p cduction or 2:ilica icn facilities," including the construction and Operation of nuclear power plants. 10 C7R 3. 4 (e) (1) . An :nspection Division was designated :o peric m surveillance and inspection of nuclear facilities. The Division's responsibilities included -
" gathering information Oc shcw whether or act the cen :acecrs, licensees, and officers and empicyees of the Cecmission are complying with ... this chapter . . . and the app cgriate rules
. and regulations of the Ccemission." 42 USC 52035 (c) . Fue: hor, to enic:ce the Act and to saf eguard " facilities, equipment, materials and ether property of the Cc=missien," the ? esident may reques: the services of any govern =en: agency, including the 73I and the Depart =ent of Justice. 42 USC 52271(a) and (b).
When the Atcmic Ine:7y Commission was abolished by the Energy Recrganization Act, p.l. 93-433 (Cct. 11, 1974),
.. AEC's auchcriev. was vested in the NRC and the Energy Research
) and Development Ad=inistra ica ( "IRDA ") . The Division of
/ Inspection and Enforcement was created ec conduct NRC investigations. Any wc her er representative can trigger the process by fc warding a reasenable complain: that he er she witnessed some viciation of regulations or licensing conditions.
An inspection must take place as scon as is practicable. Most important, :he investigation need not be limited to those issues raised in the empic) ee's original complaint. 10 CFR 19.16(b). There is no section of the Ce e of Federal Regulations which lists all areas of NRC jurir ction. Instead, individual secticas of the regulations flati: p cscribe certain activities and create guidelines for others. The NRC and the 73; have joint jurisdiction over criminal activities: the NRC has the responsibility Oc refer criminal allegations and evidence , Oc the F3: for investigation. NRC and F3: Memerandum of Understanding, 44 Fed. Reg. 75535 (1979). The Me=crandum su==arices the NRC's cle as felicws:
*(When an attempted criminal act occurs! he i= mediate contingency role of the NRC would be ene of gathering and' assessing infor=ation '
- 0 dete==ine the situation, appraising and
.s
-- c.e.a.:..g e .4.,~--. ... e - s--4 n c.---2.. -- -- .- a-
-aa
.)
i'#- F3I response, and arranging fer c:her needed and feasible censingency response assistance that-is requested through NRC channels."
-. ,, .3o-
. 3_ .
e
-. c.._ _ . . . - -- ~
-3 4
s mu.e s -,e e .a .s .. s .4 . . ,. . . J K nu,.
* /
.. . c.a .%.e ;4c4 -%. ,. .s 31 4 ..c
.t 4 4. S.A ..
.w.. 9a.,s, . a S..4a.. 6.s_4 s a ..A .a._4 7 e ,.s 4. .. s , 4 ,... 3.4 ,. s e.-
-_~,. ~ a .' . ..s, e x ,...- ..' c .s , . n s r _' .. a", v. , . = .^. . , _ aa_"cca , e rela ing to all facilities, activities and =atarials licensed j ..
. A.._ .w. . 4_ 4 ,. e...-,-y ge.
e
- 9.:. 4, as ame..dsd.* -
.2 e _t e ,1,.e . .-. . s e .. s . c .v 2w4,.4, nsi -
-w.e . .a-
, 4 s .u .. a- -
. e,. . ..--_-r
'sil within established NRC agree =ents , rules and sgu'.a: ices ,
j but Phillip refused to even ackscwise.ge the bu'% of :he I. av'dence. <.-.se3
, c . .- .-,, _- . u. a
.s
, ".e. . . v , .." ' s .' ..v e s 3 = . .' . .. a...d .e c-. .es
._'.u'~.~, .' s s u a s w .'" . .' a .. . .C ,- ~ ' s ' .'.- ..' .. a. -.'
exe'_'-' ._'v, _ a '_ s e d.. ". v ."... . A r- r _T o ,a . a '."~ .' .. ,
. ..S. e _' .. ' . ' a ' .' .. s .- v '_ a w .
! 1. sa'.e of s: clan guns On the si:a; 42 CSC ii220~'.(k) , [ 2173 (a) , (b) & (c), 227L (a) &(b) (Affidavi: a 3; 4 s 12-23-79 Confidantial Repc::s at :)
.. _a _4 y,= s _4 n 2_a _~g-u- - 1 . A. . 1_ . . a. , , - .s o. - _ u. , 7
, sw..a '
beneft: of a KC superintendent, a: a Ocs: :: C3&I cf
=cre than 530,000; Me=crandum of 2nderstanding, 44 TR
-- , s s 3 .:. ( s.e .. w e_ .m , _ .2. , g ,i , 4 .' "t. SC 3..' ' , ' f. a ) ( a' "- .' d av 4 .
at 4-5; Confidential Repc :s a 2-3, 12-L3-79 . C.- .. .' _i _' e. . . ' a _1 Te,c.- . .s a - ' ) ,,
- 3. "abricaticn and sala cver seven years of bel:
. .u,... k _' as .-...s -", - . ad .'.- m. .. .uc .t e a_ ,-_ _= d e s . a.a. i "c-
. ~ ".
. 4 1..?. .t . .e.s ,. 2 2.oT.T.a s .4 . . 1.a. C .- aA.- ...a_.$ 4.1.' 3 4. _ S.e.A A. . i .
2
=c ..s
. e .3 y .4.
. p es, %.w 1COs a a . . m r.. ..s.,.
.. .s .3. . .b.e r.'.a .. ,.
y
..em c a .-A. .
*= A e_.s.,.a w.
. d4 3 , , .9 .*297 3.n. 9. , 4-(a) t,, a< _ 2 _4 2_ a.,. 4_ ._
j at i; 12-10-79 Confidential Repc : a: 1, 4; 12-L7-79 L i C.a. r. .'. _' ' =. .". .' a.' .Re c. c.. .s a . ' .~ 2 ,
, e" r.
- _ e.. .- '= .'. Ta c. c .- . .- .
4
- 3. q. e c, .c - . c .3 .P s a r e- w-r .' a _4 ,. n c ' .v.a a_ .' a ' a * '4
?
- 4. theft of two thcusand =.cunds of cpper cable
[ smuggled in small Lo:s and rescid wi hin a week f:: F . SL5,000 cn the black marka: hv. 10 plan .ersonnel, : Oc finance a Christmans c. arty . ccmm.le:s with presti:utes; Memcrandu= cf Understanding, 42 CSC 52271(a) . s~ ,- .' '4- 3 0 %".~. ~._' _' ,' a.. ' _=' _ 2. e ,c. .s a ,. * ) C n' __'- d av _' . a .
- 5. an en ranched sv.seem Of :ime card :addine., i==. '. ic ielv. .
sanctioned hv. K C and '*G&I, wasting si7nifican a=cun:s c .4 .~.48 .s ,A . ,. . e. v ,. .
.v.g ... .1 ..A.. . .. .J ?.? 4. . a
. .. . 3.. . 4 4..,. , ,
4e . . . .
,,y e a ..3 4 , .. . 1...? 4 g .*. s g.e . y .g ..3.*.y. a _4 a. .. ,3 r w_ .3 ( .c g s.
t t.+9.
. s. ), .:.-
?-
an3 n s no ...s.1 .
? - ,a444a
\n . a.? .4 3. . .t :,. .
u . . .4. 4 .a.. . . . . 4 a.*. 3eec3
. -. . n.a_.y34s . .a . 4_. e ,.... a. . 4 .. , , - . . . 4 4
-. .2 .n __4 _ -,
Repc::s generally.) -
- . 2__-.s... .....,, ess ... ..e _4.e ,,S
. . . ..: , v, . , ...n..
_ ._...o. 1, a. z z e a---- av4. , _ . .s, e . .s -e- a. ., . . 4 .,. ., , .. ,, c, .- . a. ,.....,,.,y __ - ,_ - , _ _ . . . , , . , - - -. - - - . - - + - - ---1-- - - - - - - -
s . . n s '~h I
$'j?)
~'
- 7. an unreported fire in the contain=er.: building suppression chamber indica:ive that fire-watch and communication are inef.fective in that area of the clant; -
U.S. General Accounting Office, Reporting Unscheduled-Events at Ccmmercial tiuclear Facilities: Ocportunities to Improve Nuclear Regulancey .",= mission Cversight, at - EMD 79-16 at 3, 13 (January 26, 1979); (12-14-79 Confidential Report at 1-2). As a ' legal measure of the implications of Mr. Phillip's default, his misconduct satisfies the requirements for all of the whistlebicwing disclosure categcries in 5 USC 51206 (b) . Initially, the emissiens viciate =anda: cry legal duties for an NRC investigator. (See 99 5-7, supra) The emissions also con.stitute " mismanagement," defined.. 5 CFR 51250.3 (e) (1330) as " wrongful or arbitrary and capricicus actions that may have an adverse effect on the efficient accomplishment of the agency mission.* Eis excuse that the NRC lacks jurisdiction simply was wrong. (See pp. . supra.) That mistake alone satisfies the first nalf of the de d 4 -icn. Alternativ.ely, both misapplication of the law and failure := consider relevant l75 facts consitute arbitrary and capricious action. See Citizens , ,:; y ec Preserve overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 401 (1971); l 5:arr v. Federal Av at on Administra::en, 589 F.2d 307, 311 (7:n Cir. 1978); Keco Industries, Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct. C1. 566, 49 2 F.2d 1200 -(Ct. C1. 1374); An:llles Tcaus., Inc. v. Government of Virgin Islands, 338 F. Supp. 315 322 (D. St. Croix V.I. 1975). The error in judgment interferes with the efficient acccmplishment of the NRC missien in two respects. Cn the
=cs: basic level, Mr. Phillip's exclusion of relevant evidence prevented the NRC from pursuing its mission of enforcing its own rules and regulations for safe, efficient construction ci nuclear plants. 41 USC 52035(c). (See pp. , supra.)
More specifically, by his action he impeced an intricate interagency enforcement precess for referral of criminal , allegations to law enfcrcement authorities . 44 FR 75535. l (See p. supra.) l Similarlyr the exclusion recresents " abuse of authority," defined in 5 CFR 1250.3(f) as " arbitrary or capricicus exercise of pcwer by a Federal official er erpicyee that adversely affects the rights of any person c : hat results in personal gain er advantage to hn salf or Oc perferred other persons."
,3 As seen above, it was arbi:rary and capricicus c ignere 3R; relavant facts by misacplying the law. The actica benefi:ed t4-
- e
- 434.y ,*. d " b. e ' .r.s ..- . - .4 . .*. . ' . ' . . ~ , w. . , a . =. . .'.- '.e
. .- 6. , .. .. . . . ' ' ..*. e -
.'.~4...
. . .. e =.x ~. ' ".s '.. . s .' .'.s w~ ~ ' ' . . a . .=d . a ga ' ..s . b.e y L'".'..' ~ , u.". .* .1
. e a _4 . s ,'Ib.?. -. e a.w .* e .. . . w ..e a a...,e ...s .
w a...ses a ~4. e .
. " . 2.".#3
. ---y 's ac 4 .. : a-- re."a.ad *g. ss was.e,* we.'.'..ed
- d
- .n 5 C."2 S '.25 0 . 3 (d) e s "unnecessarv. ex endi:ure of substantial .
s .s . ." ...c .e.v , . . - a s e. .' es
. . .' .' ..s .ar. e s ~ .' " .=.~ e s sa-v, ex endi ures ed s= aller a=cus:s."
C.-s. ve.....s a..d. w ..s -. ,..'.7 . .d e .* .= " s = ' . a ad.a.t .,.A w,s =.r. 4 4 w. . 4 1 5.. 4 . .. .s.-. : ,4 .t.i.a a. ._4.,. 4. : ?. . 1. 4.. ead,'.e'
. r .av . a.
- e 4. s a 4 ... .
... ... e . s .a n e . . 4.s . . . . ..s.,
. ..-.4.....-..44...4,. . .. . .-
,. s a .?. ..ae.*d . .
.s.e +4 e p.ta4n i.3 2 9 e. .. a . es.4.a.ed
. .- . w..s.
s .,4) m .4 .e .i .4 n , v4 -.g r...?,.4.. J.. *--
....y....... 2.3 .4 g g .,. .. 2 o .e . .qge-.. .. . .~ .g...a.es '..* ave 3g. ..".a . s *. s C. tw.b.e.- e ~V * - 3' .'. ".'.'.'..#*.., .S .d
. ". o y .? .= .7 . w- ' ' .i.
.c . ,0 .... .t-.4 e .w. e _4,., e .t . e .1 ~ 3 .r. . .-
. g.m.. .. ,.u s . . .1 , .?330 .4 .. .e.< 4_ew g4.. w ,, q g.?.43 . .v.g g .=.g- .g,, gg;a. ) ( * ;. ,. ..g 4
s
.g g a. .
4
. .g 4e .gwa ) . .
.wgi CG&E customers alreadv. =. a v. fc .his .ca-c erative :Lan ,. .
4..i .4 ..y 3.4 .?..v3. 4
..A..a 4. .. 4 . .... , ,. 4 = .;
. . . ,.3.
. w..t.y .. .. . .3
..g 4 4 .?. 4 a ... ..,..,.e s4 a.*. equ.es . ..
. s a . ew a.e .4 . C_. ,.,m.e ., .. 4.4.44 .
w.e ..g.. g.s o.c .g- ..,c.4 .. .. .. a.e _3 ay . s.
.v .. ar:, .' ee.,a .e ' s d..i a c.?. s" e rcas = ' .. v wa= v. - w =- -- ' - - - -- --
a..x f ' 3 .4..=.4
. . g J. e .13t/s anA C . g ,. .,,,y e " =.a . .? . .= 4.x3.= y .'. a r a .'a?..'
.s... w 4 g v,.w..a .. ,.g g . .C w w
. m. 4 .. . 4 ..
. . -- ~ L.
- A . . e . . 4 ., .w. .* .y
. . e _t. ... .... .. . .s . . ...414
. y
..., .aeC4 s # * - ns ~ .~. .*.=. . e '*..' .'s e s . ~.'..*?
. .. . .4. a s .4 t V. " . * * .= ". .*. av. a..- a a.w.c.--4 ..a. s .
a . . _us.4 a 4. e .u.e u .-4 7. 4
.. ..e a ~c . .*a
. a. x 4 2 . 4 .. ., ...a,
- l. CG&I's acse (as well as he NRC's) a: Ci.=er. _n short, he
',. , uh _' _' . .'... .e _ a s . d a.m. a..d ... . - ".a "..=
. .' . s u e s . .= .'.s e d ".v. . " _ .
- a. ry- . , e,,.a_. e r a. 4 sw.i . .. st e w e :.L._st.ed _.. t ..--I. .v
. .sw4334.
. .-- - e ._.. .ed .
a dead ear := tha: demand. i, 2 .4 .,.a t i v. , w.e <....' s a ' - .. e -:. e .".a =4 a ' subs =.. .'a.' a..d.
.- 3:ecific danger to public health c sade v.*
. i .'5C 5120 5 (h ) .
l: Nuclear
.w pcwer plants rely on an ex,. e=ely danger:us :echnc'.cqy.
, . ..e . 3 _4 , .w. a- es . . 2 4 s.,.sx . e . s.,. a.,. , s _ , -w.._.
- . . . . . , .,..ec.:,.a ..4. a. __
l- =culd lead := disasta:. C hvicus '.v., . the .:nblic sade v. is
... . ..- . ' sed v*.e..
. ".cse wl.~. "ci.'.' '.e :'a.. =.e A k. .- - ,.
when .he fire alar sv. stem ir inadactate.' ea: ens
^
t aisc -
! public sada:v whe . securit*e 4.5 so icese :ha black marke: .
.. g . u.:,,- . .
. 4
. . e.,
s....n--.. , .. a =a,,g e, ., g.m. ..4 n . u._. _4 y ,. 4 .,. o u.e
,,e .
. , 37. ..
p.
. .s. _4 _ 4 : e g 3.s u., g . a .... .o.n.._,,-,.
..., , a s . n,. ,
.n . ,
.: g. .y4 4 - - - . ,, ..
- . a'; " -a :c s a- '. .". =. ..
a
'. .a sa.=. . ". .
d
. . '.. _ =,. a .-. ' . =. '- . I'. ..' .~. = ~ .=. .", i .' ; . .r .- . =ah*...=..=.-..*.="..s.....=..'
_a . _#
'.e ~,... s .-~.~.c=-.
. . . . ... ..*.e w'".*.' . . r~ .~.'.
- ." .a ~..=. v. , . ' ' ~ . = ' . . ' _ * . ' . , -
dse=e6 hcse issues L::e'. avan:. . l l __ _
s_ ... . -. -.- O; II. MISMANAGEMIN*, ABUSI CF AUTHCR PERpI'*UAT:CN OF gv ). .
",Y, GROSa- wa Sm.v_, Ao..D. , ,, o .r .r
. .. ,a . . vo ~, C . s w S u n,.-. o . n. .. nS.D SPEC!?!C DANGIR 00 PC3LIC HIALTH CR SATITY, 3Y MR.
y .
., H .-u .., . ,m.,..s C L. G.d .,n, L..
. u.. .s . _R. ,s- . G. . .V ,C._,...C L.__,e .
...o.
. Mr. P.hillin.'s investi3ation failed on . arall.el. lev.els:
not only did he ignore rel'avant issues'within NRC's furis-diction, but his methodology in researching the remaining issues was inccmplete and one-sided. On the significan issues covered, the report is little =cre than the utili:y's version of the f acts. It pales in ec=parison with c: hor cbjective, . thorough NRC reports.
' ~
There is & well'-developed body of legal guida.Ece~dni authoritative recem=endations for the conduct of'NRC investigations. Investigators are authorited to administer caths and subpcena documents, 42 USC %2201(c) , and to cenault workers in c:dar to perform effective and horough investiga-tions. 10 CFR 19.15(a). The Ge.7eral Accounting Office han recc= mended that NRC investiga:crs contact workers, sinc,e
- af tsmen building nuclear clants can p cvide valuable .
information on the quality of constructicn work. Repcrt to the Congress by the Ccmpt:011er General of the United States, U.S. General Acccunting Office,'the Nuclear Regulatory
'N. Commission Needs to Ae.gressivelv. Moni:or and Independen:1y
! Ivaluate Nuclear ?cwer Planescenstructica (EMD 73-30 at 7 (September 7) ("IMD-7 3-8 0 ") .
Investigators even are authori:ed to expand -heir investigations beycnd the =atters raised by ecmplaints, in order to fully investiga e the issues raised. 10 CFR 19.16 (b) (1980). GAC recc=me'nds this practi'ce, having found tha: reports too often are unduly limited in scope and detail. sucra. (IMD-73-30, at 22.) Mr. Phillip ignored these authoritative guidelines. On the mest basic level his reper: simply presents the management side of the dispute. For example, he failed to talk with many witnesses who would have verified Mr. Applegate's. allegations., And for these pecple he questioned, Mr. Phillip's repor; makes no reference to his authority ec taki'swc n affidavits and subgcena relevant documents. These steps would have made witnesses acccuntable for their asser:icas. Phillip basically restricted his contact to members l of corporate management at the :i==er facility. (NRC Repc :, a 5.) Several of the CG&I officia s he centacted were themselves the targets ci, Applega e's charges. Cthers had nothing to centribute. But Phillip igncred empicyees who z could have verified the allegations and expanded on the
' ?, discicsure.
Two CG&I officials Phillip contacted were in-4 ately f amiliar with Mr. Applega:e 's charges : Mr. Schwiers, the Quality Assurance Manager, and Mr. Swain, the Construction i 1 1*
f s
.Ma..a,a , we a scs ec. ..' w...,,d.,4..g .. - .=.. *.*. e . 2.'.*... =~~r .*v. a.e s . ,
cen: acted by Mr. Applegate..and GA2 named swain as de =ar. -
..os. -
es,c..s--.e -' **
. ~ ve---'-...,
-~~ ' ~,~a...v.
.= s s ~ a..~. e . e ' =.c '~
. .-...s Of faul:y welds. Further, Schwiers is cne Of two CG&.?
c'ficials who denied Applega te per=ission :c pursue his leads en quality assurance deficiencies. Sc:h men had ccvicus s e ' ' _' st. .' .. .e . e s ~.s .' .~. ". e .~ec'
. . . ". ' s ~., ". . .~. e . '. s . .. e _' *. e_-
wa s .".e s ' ~..ed,. " .d e-
. a". , a..' . ".o .
e ~e .- . . v.idas .. ...--'- cd the questiens asked. un,y w._ se ,, ., s e e 4 3 .w. s- . c ' ' _4 ,. .' a ' s .". . ' .' . ' ' ' ' e con acted -- Messrs. .Marsha'.1, Fallo: and Eang -- are
.a- . a
.. - . . ar.,.,ge.n g g ee.n- ..g. .-o -a. . ,n. . .s.u ,--s..ende...
a-,...i.aa.a .
., a
.v.ars..a . nas .c. . aced- .d.e. c a " . a ' ".c" , .". n' e r .' s e. a .=.."..a -, ed
> ya= y . u. _aa . a_, , ,,,.ca.
. . ... : . ,.. v s a - . gg 1..a mag a.3 e ..._.., .
....---- ,-as w, 3
.. -..e a.. * = -. . c c i ' e e,a_' s a . ".e a .., Av=. s ' =.x ee..s a .
(e4a<--- av' , a . 4 .:.) . .1 4 ..c e .v.. 5. ". _' -' ' e- --.v'ded ... .ec -'- c ' - .e s ..' .. ..s .= s k ed a..d . =. .' .- * .' sed,
.. . -. . i =- ' .". ee s s .' ." ' e . .,
cccclude whe he .hese issuen aere ccvarad h.v he interriew.
. 3cth Mess:r. Hang and Pal'.cn .clav.ed kev. Oc'.es in the b.. .sa ' .'y we ' d s , .=..d. "c "..". ave a r e aw..a' s .a % =.
a._4. u., ,w
. ar ... .
in avoiding a full exposure. of events a: ": ' -" er . *v ci'.e e.o r .' - v. a. d a 2 a. o. .u.
. ad i .6= -
3 a y k ".e- -
, =..=. ~.e, "..ad w-. . y .t a i ..ed .w .~.y ' -
y .' aV a .e
'.a "A.'. wa s .= ~. y ~~.~. 4 ..ry wea- ".a =.a..~; *..a d. . e , e e. . = ^,. . *.- P..e..
.S .b.- 4 ' .,.y 3 - s"yCke Y.'#. V. a.*..,* , .**. e a .' * *.a dv. '.*..* d ..= .k *... a . . eW .'.#.* wi-~"'-
.w.
7-
'. a.' .'...~. "n as 5. e . ..a.. = . ".e . an . e. ,. .' ". a ' ,=.C" ' .v. v e .i..'.
". a .= e r . ., v ed ..". a v. e .' .'. s . ". . ' .ad e 4 =.c . =.d .
. ~.. . .- - v =. .- - v. a . . . . . ' v.
.~.4,.. ., w g .4. - a ,_. ,.,,..a. w. .. . .-"es,.- ..,." . .". '-e
, y
... w .4 .
d-
'~
~ .
=ay have 'ur hered a suspected :cverup c' safety de' acts a:
r.. w C._. e.. .g -.s .. . 2. , - . e s e S. , se, g z.a p.g 23 Syna g.u.rg e .. . - . .. .
" - . . .aq..es , ... .are s .v. . n'er'e,a,.e
- 3 -
ade " - ..v=. sa._'...s w' *. ,' t, ?.M :orsennel. ) ( " A=. c. Lec. ate :a:es * ) (6 ' ' - t. ' . cg.,2 .t. . ..
.. gg.. 3.,sc a 3 . 233., _a., o. w. . - s ' .'. : ~e rg e...Sc 3 j w '. ". T. TS a..d. S.u. ~w.e.-s, "u aca.'.. ".a .ock .o a-wc-.. s..=.=.e...s.
. TIS was ?M's successer a the plant and a Ocmpeci:cr. NIS
=ssess...e...s -.. a f-w"e w'. w e .' .' .d .. , -y. " . . ~ - -
4 - i ,
"v. '.M .
t l
. . .,d.a..ngra.he p s .. b._r a - u e a...s u pe c., o n 3 -,.u '.cs =msw.2" .c ...v=.
., 2- -
ed. .,, e. 2 -
* .t..s 4
. _..e$., .. .
a- ig.e a. g v -: .. , . .p.~ g , s.. w...?. .? e. . . a... e . ,,, . :
.. .e_ e.y . . ....acy a
- w. a .,,.
.?.g g 4 .g .- .,d4.g.3yhy . .
..._ . . - gg . . " "a c " '. .'. '.. e "< a.'.v e .*. c *. .*
au s y e c . ".a ,. O. v. 2. . =. s .i .d..=.~. . _? - .. = s . n' ' .'. - =,.c, e ' a- .-=s7c.ses
" e ~.=. ..ye.-=.^ '..v. = c, ' ' -- a . e ' ..= a . s .~ .- =. y . '. a a - . .- ~.
' ' . .. a
.' sea ... . C ., . a t-.. .A . . s ._, y . -. 2. .,.c_. , .x.~.a... .;; ,. e ..u.s s e*2-- . u,. A
< .a
- w. .=. c . = ' .~. =d ."-~ ' = ar .- .. s ._-~,.'.- ' .~ .. s s a * . .'.. s ed,. ' ..~.' "*s _ ,r
- a ..= eed. ~. .~..~ =. .- a a. ' ,. .- . v. ' _" v_ . a' ~y 7 .i .s e, = . =. .
. . (....'_=, =. -
.. . ..h. g .g a . g .- . ... . a =.= gg .' *. *. .* r M .'J-
- a.d . g .'.-.'.-*=....4 .. .
M' y y . 4,;' ,3 . s. . b..,..
.=.v.'.'
S.v. ' a- - y a .- =. . . . .- y c .. = . . . . . .=. 4 ~. . =.. =. 4 . . ' . . = a c h s ' ' .'.= v,
.s.e e .;. a.- .-* , _ 'su. . .2.aa,,..a , - : .. A .. a.
.. ; . .s... .sa. .. . . 2
.. -. y w * , ,. g.* .*.
w- wa**
.-....-.4-e 4a5 w=-'- = w a =. .' '.
- n' .'..' = d .: *. ' s # =. .= .-* a .
= .". -
w "%- -- a 7 e-= .k ' . . . .' . .= e .' v, - 4
^ 7 7 . =.c, a . =. y . .=. v. =.d.
..".=...=.ye'..-.".,'.'..y . .
l A .J .J .J a.d./ . .. a ...
, .1 .*. . *,
-- .--- . . , - - . y _ .m ,
e .
.---..~_- . .~ . _ .
9 m)
?
(41/ Phillip never contacted any ::aftsmen or others referred ' by Mr. Applegate, either dir'actly or through his confidencial
, :eports. Several of these individuals have made statements to GAP rep:esentatives. These statements and affidavits are available with proper assurances of confidenciality and the
.u.
.i..ndividuals cerm.ission
- 1 The significance of this emission cannot be understated.
If Mr. Phillip had bothered to speak with the line empicyees who construct the plant daily, he would have learned the full scope of the problems s: Zimmer. " ?cr instance, employees referred by Applegate would have discussed the icilcwing issues, had Mr. Phillip cared ec listen: .
- 1. KI: knowingly installed and ripped cut unsuitable main steam relief piping, a: an estimated labor cos cf 5320,000.
- 2. 2000 pound fittings were installed in 1979 on residue head valves, although 5000 pound fittings are required.
- 3. A radicactive waste drain is clogged with concrete which carelessly was poured into the drain.
g 4. A. residue hea: valve brcke when a pipefitter
;j bumped in:0 it, raising new questions about the quality of
- metal used for valves.
- 5. Sensitive parts on welding rods are possibly damaged through 3:crage a: imp:=per temperatures, and pcssibly lost thrcugh f ailure :n fol10w proper paperwork and labelling
- requirements.
l
- 6. Argon gas valves for flushing oxygen frem pipes routinalv. are left co.en bv. the dav. crew, causing the nivht crew -
ec be overccme bv gas, a problem abcut which CG&I Safety I Director Cummings expressed disinterest. t
- 7. Prefabricated piping receivied in 1977 has defective f! welds, but construction supervisers told . crews no: to repair them because the velds avere made of f , site.
- 3. At least three sources contacted by Applegate l
confirmed that an estimated 10% of the plant's prefabricated
- - welds are defective.
l,
- 9. EngLneerLng " designs" :=v:Lnely are draun af er tha ll l-fact Oc conform with piping : hat already had been installed.
i
- 10. Shock-abscrbing electrical ::ay hangers previcusfy J-b j fcund unsatisfacecry are still unsafe due := faul:v welds, l
and el- ctrical cable ::ays remain dangercusly full. l -
0 ' - - 6
. w
. ' . - . ,ca. .d . = . . . ' . . . " ' . ... k a ..'. n '. s e ^ u a . s _ f " ..f s .=... 4 .'...ahe
' ' ". e s . a.~; _' . . ", . .. .= .% e ". y u a . s =_ . .
.. *. e .~ c ' .'..~.y~ ~..~..a_, *e"_a"se . . .* a
.' .' a u *. . . ' . e .c .' a.. . ' s ' e s .' ,, . . .
w ... ~1
.' "- e-- s " s e^. .. - c . ' 'v.
. ..". e .. au
... . 4 .-9._5 y ..,t
'l
.' .' . A A -s s _' ~,~. . _' _ ' aw ' .. ".a ". e a . e.x .". a .. , s - . . .. _- ' y a.. e t 4
ye . . .' . . ad. a r. c r
. e.a -
.. 3.'s akS.a._'v, .c ." . .- e. _' .' 0 0 y c ..d. s c.' .
y s s s ur e *..-. u9 4 p a.' y e s c ...' J" .sa.. .. ".a..d..'a
. . .'00 y c".ds, . .' y . ' . .9c. -
.s.e : te s 1. seg.y _z q ,,,c._t - - - z,.s
-. w' . ". a '.a..'. s __=" .'. va .e.-
l that wccl.' have. heen radioactive had he p'.an been in l
- ,e. a ._' . n .
4 ,; '.3. *here have been .sericds when :hars vers .c securiev. s urve _' _' _' a .~.~. e . am e_1 s ' "-_ ' .. , .~.~. .'. =. .=. .~. .^ ~. s. ' ' e _' _' ~, s: _' . _ = s . '.e s'e, ar.d. , e__'.~e.e_ .ac _ .v. ... ...s ' s . s e .".- . a.. s.v. s..' sA- , e_ .' .d . 2.s . ...y a .e.u; . .ac c .. ... . .. 4 . 3. 3.,.w__. a
.,, .e ,.. c .
6
- j. ' 4. A . tax a. .'.".de ..wa ' s= e _' a v. =. e ". e.' . = ~, ' ., - v a s = v i_d a..-.. =A
- v. -.
.~..rar's.s s . s~,a_ ' e,' -'_ _' <'
_ . < -. . g a . . > '-_-~_ q . s e . .~. ". a s _ . e , ' ar.' _- ., u . ' .. e .5. _'- ' ..g c .' .= . ec _- =_ -v. . ah c . s s . . ~. . . = . . < '_ ". . a. . . s . _t -2. _e. ,.t . e y , , , --_.=.d - .. ' .- - ' e
. 44
. . .b. e a . ' . . , ". = '. " e e . . . .b. e = - ' . . ,
4 3 . . a. ... .w, . .<-e . =. s s a, r- . ., v a ' a..' ...a..a c. s ..a.. . , =..4 . . " . = ,... .' v. . _' ... a
..". e a _s _-s ' ' . et,' 2e _ a ~~~ ca _' a.~. ' '< .. u ' s ' ~, =. a h _' .s_ - . ' ._' s . _ - '. , ' = .. .
CA and. sats:v..
. _3 -s. <-
. e.
. . .a# w a ..- . .s
- w. . . ....= . . .= , a: '. a. . . . . . s ' -'a... a
. a _-. =-c-
> --=-".e
- - -c. s 4,. . .d....s_,wn'c=..-=,.._'_'__'..,=*'=--...=_'a-..=... . . a .
-. -r -r .,-. 4.3 . _4 y e _.a. 3 .e 4 a.. . gs w.y. ., . .
., .y .
t j _3a. - ..4,.
. . . . .4
.-r_ ,_44 -- . .g,.s =..d . . ..
n'
-r. ' .. v. s e s .-'. a v e '.. .= =...
. ._2.. _4 a g _ gg ..y .
.a , , - .> n _ - _2_._ .y.
ga.- .z . g.s _.yya2-- .
..e..a 1 1 _, 1 shcu'.i they ccmplain ahec: CA practices.
'.3. A KI::' smp'.o.vse has kap a detailsd 'curnal . c' sa' sty n a . a .a. a. ., .s _..n.-
<, 4s e.. s a,. n
_s..e-. -
.' 3 . A .... ..c r. * ', k a * .= ~. . .g ,_- ' re ' ' . s.- s a *. .' .....e_ _' s ".a .
. .,,y . .
v.,,- s. .._
,s g
.~_4 _' a.s _= w av. w.*.er.
"* ~# a '- s as
".a , t ar. ., es , . . .
f'a.d'.-.**.'*.a-
; .tJ . a, J.. S* . .. b.S 4 . .
' a.t.* A a C ,. .'..J s.**.*.*.
.".a.~. .r.c _*
7 .4 g .* a . _4 . n g ~ .p.. - 4. ._.a. .g
' .e s a v.".a_-, =.a,e 2 1..,3es
. . .. ,g ,.
- g. ..
,.q t gA.-,
.,.s .
_~,... _. .. . .: -..r...a. g g .
,_ ' .- y fe_ 4.
._e, ,
.. .a m
.s. ..a. .%* . gy. .u. g, e. . .a. . * ,..a ;- .t :A
- c. .
. . .. .. e... s. g .u..,.
', ,' - =.. s e =. s . s ~7.- - . > =. ' .' .' ,a... . .' i s '. . . s a * = .v. = .d- ..~...s..-....'..~...
( __. . . . i s _ q. .. g . . . ( *. ) U ) f .'.'J a..A s'...'.',. s _ .".._'.'.y- . - . ' . ' . ' '. . .= v a _~ =. a .- . e,d.
. .s. _u,g4 _sa . gUS g .~_.; _u. 1. ,._a ,a .. ._m . , . a. .e . y g g.,< 1. 2.y, ., s a. .- . g..s .
, , 4 e .,._._ a : ... .y .
& .:_. ... ,. 2 a. t -_ . . . -. s, . . . . .w&
-. -. w......,S -
i.
-4
.--yy _tsA b y. %.. 4 a . a _4 .? * .= a. ..
J ***
. .a e',
..' 'C " g.'e* ._ ' . .4 ". 4 * * . g *4C .. .==. 4 .== *=
- 1. n, a.=. S =.~. a~
a, ' ..& . .1 q =,. ..e . . . .- =. y . = S t . . . = ..'. ~ a S -
.a.= _'v. =-- . ." w.".~...'.=>-
- .'.'S..,..'..'.'._=_'=.
~~.._'-.'.~~.s-e......=...=.s.-~.=..,'_~.~.,s~~.=.s._'.~.~.'.=.
_W. a. .4. .e.g . ' a,. f ,,a. .
~
.w.e.*. .t .a3. _..4 . *. .X .4 g .,. .W ,....i I
i i 4 l _ . - --
1
.m ' /
( l Mr. Phillip's documentary research and en-size NJ' inspections were eqvally un-i=pressive. For example, one of the keys c Applegata's allegations is tha: :he radiographers' , inability to perform their jobs free from management constraints has tainted the quality assurance program. Even so, Mr. Phillip failed to look beyond the paperwerk by :erf=rm-ing independent :ests or radiographs on any of the pipes and welds in question. Instead, he relied en the documentation and interpretations of officers at NIS, CG&E and KII, all whom have a clear financial stake in the cu : cme of the probe. GAO has critici:ed the NRC for not pe.rfor=ing independent verifications, calling the practice a barrier to assurances of adequa:s plant c=nstruction. IMD-73-30, a: 10.) Mr. Phillip since has claimed tha: Ocmpanies have nothing to gain from cheating on Ouality Assuranca paperwork, since they risk censure by the public and NRC if caught. Su: there is little risk of exposure when an investiga:Or ignores most of the relevant wi:nesses and issues, and is satisfied no: to obtain independent verifica icn of management asser:10ns. As a resul , the evidentiary emissions constitute mismanagement and an abuse of authori y. Further, the emissions perpetuate gross vaste and a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. (su=ra, a: A Mr. Phillip did not even steadily pursue the limited
- investiga:ica he conducted. He came to Zimmer af ter hearing charges of safety deficiencies and 00verups.
Yet after announcing his investi.ganica and conducting a prelisinary review, he left the site for three weeks. (NRC Report, Ccver Sheet.) The time gap cannot be justified. Three weeks is sufficient time to alter er festroy cuality Assurance records, to establish a " party line" respense en key issues and to silence critics within the organi:ation. As a result, . the interruption also constitutes miamanagement. (su=ra, Mr. Phillip's investigative methodology was so flawed that both he and the NRC are in an indefensible position. Net all NRC reports are susceptible to that evaluation. For instance, the South Texas Project investigation, released in April 1980, is an example of detailed reporting on nearly identical issues as those raised a: Oi==er -- flaws in , quality assurance, intimidation of CA staf f, and management l ccmplici y. U.S. Nuclear Regula:Ory C ==issica Cf fice of Inspection and Inforcement for Region 7. Report Nc. 50-498/ i 79-19 cn the Sou:h Texas Nuclear Pr:f ect (Final Review l Ac.ril 22, 1950). Tha:.or be included indec.endent field investigation. The investiga:crs researched broad issues. as
... well as nar:cw underlying examples. The investigators listed all issues discl= sed, and elicized confidencial sworn state-
- ' men s. Phillip's effort was sheddy by
- =parison, and a t
i disservice both to the cublic and :he NRC,
- - 4 - .
I 4 e
, _ - -.n. - -
.3-N,
.... .y* . . .c..y* .n.\e m n J f**l=
. .. y Te .".'f a' .2. Q* *.C.."' .1** **
.w' * * *. h. w* .O. .* ". V. ,
A.. w 3 7. ...% . Q ?.*. f.*n* . **.n'"a . a /
* . u . ,G. G ems . .- gg.... ... . . . . .
Q . n.gIm. . . .h M .oog 4.e e5. =a #. J ~r . J . .. .A&t,w a.
. . . . = =
.w .s3. 6 ;*.a n . ."*. L. .%
** -y Q M .T v m. v. p
.1 . .u n. . .S .u. ..= *.. .= m. , . . .w w %4.: g ra r *-*A. =s
..in ..=m
. . G . .
- 2.A . v.
.s. Eaa.. e m.bsn m m. d a ee w. g... .tb ... 3...tg.h. .
*r.e " Laws discussed above are onL*.r exame.'.as of .ha -
su " s 1:.da .' ,~.'s.' .' .f ~. .' ..".o. .N '. .c *. .= .' - . >. . '.'. .~. e .~ . , s e c . . .~.~.
"v.
. - s e c . 4 c. . a..a ' v . s ' s - =.v a.a .' s . ".a . *.- . 2 "...' .' .' .'e' a- ey... . c. w r.
a-- er 1,.c. . a .e ' s - .".m= --a. s .' a-: a..ked. v .3 ". .~ 4 s c.",. .a . ' .. n s , ..t ' a- . =-. y . =. - _4 . s . as _3 .. n s .%. _. . , _w e . s en_.a 4 ns ';., . . / e.s. .._t ., ..f c .nc.5...s
.. . . . . .y c . _ . . ss
. $ wi.:c . .e . 44 . 3 _.. . 2.g
. . 4 .3_4 . 4... ._, ... $t_- yi. _2. a...
- w. y4.. , .A .4 . . . s ur e w-,
. a . .a q w . ' e s a.x ..= e - . ' v .' . .t a ..' . . . '. .' aw ' . . . ,' a e . a , a ,. -
.u ..
e .w. 4_ _ _e _43. =
. . We g.,. d".c . v d .* .*. ....'.v -* a9 .' . .. .- =. '. .= .. 3 = - . e s ,
w a s . .= .# "..' ..". - -.a. 'a '
,..=... .- . ..s -".c.. '. .. ...... * '..as.
- n. . ...g.....,=t..,._,
e -
%.,... .v.a- ." r. , s. 2 3 a n.y .'. * , a s . e . w .' ". 0 4.. ' .' .' .' e and '.i'.~r 3-
.' ..v a s -- , a . . .i .' .' .' .' = ... s c . . . a' e .' *. c. .= .*. =a.d . 2."..'.'.'..' e ."..e . a ,a _'.. ".a.
..ex_ '
av.. 2"- " ..*. -=.,c.-.'=.-...=.-'.I a . .d ' . =. .= s e n #. - _' ..v =. s .' . , . . a-
.4,.. a
.c .... w ge4 .... .. su .
~. .a_ '.... * ".a
.. .. . . ~ .~. . a c . '. ".. _' .' _' ..# c '...* d w _' ".
..W. g '8 .s. .* .? m.e.p .s- .* "..".4 f- .'* *y .' . . c, g g .' .J **
p .. a.". .?
- Y. a s *w...' .7 * .. ".*. *#
.. . *w.*=.
. %. .s . . $ d. .. =a.. .. y-- e,.k.*.-a m g, 3
.. f a. Se. .u. yg3 . g.. e. .* *.y .a =,...y =q.
ay a m
.J.a..a .. . .. g.4..,.
.w. .. ,; a g o J a. ..y
- p. gg..m.a3 .. . .'...o.;.6.gj
.. . . . .' a.
=*
p.3 . na
=
.J.g g * "... ed .= .". w '/ *. '.3"".'.'.'.".5
. . " * . * .-*.7%'"..". .a
". .'*. . a .'. ', 'I ~ J.'.'.8..'*.. -
.= .". c c* *.** . e . . . ""3 ~ .* s . . .. . - # g. '".; .". C.'* .* .d ...-**.'.-..v*...-*.aw"*...
. .. ** J*****
. . . . =ge7.g .=.
=....'.7 .f b. 4 4 3% . = 3= = * . a_.SQgh..'^ ==...$ ~ .s .*. M. .". - a'* =
, = - . y u g .' *. _' =.
- a '..C.*..'*..*
. . .* . . ' '...'a.'*.a'.#..",.
' .\%.'...'..~..=.'.'.,. '~. e .~. .= ~ * ', _' =_ c . ' . .. a ~.~~ .~ 1c ' =. s .' .~.
. , . .. ". a
[. a .w. . A ,f . .r. w. . 4 .. . s . .a c,:s, sw411 4 s
.,..s. . .A . .w. .s . .w. e g. .qC .%. .,.C _, ,. .
, . . . . -r .
1 y 2 w a.- *. c #. *..* " . * - a ' .' e C. 3 . 4. ,a,...' s 2. q a .' .**. s . * # " e. .* .# . .*.'" n'-y e.'.*?, a . S . .'. ** 84
- p. .1 .v.- w.,.. - ., z ..f . 3. t-.c ; .C .2.e c. c .- , a..) .
~~
w.. ".a - d a s , n' y"y .' *.<. a .a.
.1.9. a. A .9-( a Q1... g.4 .g.,. A.u.a <
. gg. .. g . *.
... 2..,._ -, %..eygy
. a. , . %. g . ..,. c .a g a.p.
*a.'".'.'.*..*~w".. .? * ". .. . ,/ ., *
- d " *'., " ~ n-Q V.***-
..a *
. . . . W h e.". a' "n"".'. 8.'* a . e
.. . g e c _.. . " a
'. a.' . sea y .. aA 61 ..
=
A _ = 1 , c . . '.' ' *=. $. a g
,n
...1.4 . gg . . . C'ga.
*-..' a- c .' 1.' s. u.
A' ~y ~y .' a.3 a . .= .~ .'. .=.d ~~ . ~. .' . 3s 3 e- v =..~. a ' .~......=.s * '
.e.J b a
. .. 4 .I4 . ,. ..
3 -y 4
. .X ....S_..s ... ..
4 .
.s 4
. ... .. .s.C 4..
~. ; . %. o. C.%. 3 _4 . ..~.. 3
/* .%.g g . . c,3. _1 a.tyg . =. . .s. .i s.y6e h.e . .'. e " .* .' .'. #.
. M'y- y _' .S c, a . *. ' 3 '"*S'..'.*.**..*
" . 3. .. e.
.'6 4%. . ' .a d..s. a .
'.l* pw.-. 4 .%. 4 . .T . ij
( . d*.. 3a
.=
3 .e .4 d. .m.y -J.,=.4.. 4
....4. . . .
i 'g W ,s.yy.. g,. a. t I g.W. 4 . . e. . . .' ..f 4a . I 3 .4 t.' .'. a. .' ;' , .' t - . . :." . . ' . . ' . y' . ' - ' a s w- ' '- = s
. .. . .. ...' e * ....,.* ' = c a - .= 4 - =
y - .y g . W ..q3 .W
..sg . 4 *-. * . 4 .J
. e. 4. .* 4 g.s .. *. . . ., W .f -
w =J cs .=.l.
.. p.w. 6. a. . . . s.
a d "..'... 7
- v. s'...=. y e. 4 w. . . *. .
'. t .
's '.t . .C .B. 7 c. - . , .=
y . . "J' . 'f . A' y y . a.e, .=. ,. .= l v a S ,.~.~. . .~ ~. .'.v. **-=d. . . . _ . '.c
. e .".~ ._' ~. e . :a d. .' .'.. . . --
"..'a- ~.'. a s .'. ~ ~.
. .. .1.a
. 4 .d = -.'I. :~ -sa.'."_'.'.'.-'I.*..._'a.'..."...
l 2
. . ".=. p = _ - . r# .=../..=.
4
. .jg .? .ya,.d 4
. u. a, . . g .... . , m 4.. p.
.. .. . 4. a y .?. .
.s. . . . '
- t .Q .s. , .a _.
**4 a....sa; .. . ,s .._4.-a a 2 . .
3%.
.. .---y y .. .a.e . .aA u. a a. ,s . .- Myy: a.,; a . a r a.
a.
.d..C t.s. .
. .4 e.s.
. . . . , , . ..6.e a.b.y .
J.3
.. ... ..,.......;. .63 % d a. 4.a.
. J. .s ..J.
g 1 4 g.' .4 _' .4. .,
. .y J
. . %. 4a. 3. ,7 .4.J 3 .w..3 r
as w - em
e , . 9
~ ,~ o -
O^ U In the sa=a vein, the report asserts that Applegatefor Phillip en March 3. . screened and played " parts of the capes"Mr. Ac.=. legate :.:cvided a_ll cf _ - That is simply inaccurate. It was Phill;p who his evidence to the NRC inve'stigators.l i ing his reascns := Applegate 1 excluded sections, witheus exp a nThe coarse quality of the , (Affidavit at 14.) for Mr. Phillip; they
- , at the time. l d bcdy tapes might have created difficulties were made surrepticicusly with the use of a concea eSue Phillip could have a recc der in,sc=e instances. h uality. Applegate In the necessary audic wc k :o ing:cve t e q himself has undertaken this task, with favorable results. these a reasonable probe of alleged ccercion.and ble. Sun Mr.
l coverup, taped conversa icas would have been inva ua Phillip squandered this vital evidence. s S. ?indings . Mr. Phillip investigated three narrow issues in the Applegate disclosure: 1. Oefective' welds in safe:y-related systems have been d K311. accepted, x=cng chem were welds CYG06, HR42 an - dd p 2. Tive defective welds were identified in prefabrican piping but the pipes were accepted and installed in a safety-related system. i 3. The manner in which sadety-related installed d six-week pip ng was flushed was inaddqua:e and a schedule , flush was reduced c two weeks. q 4 We will examine his analysis en i (NRC- Report, at 3.) eacn :ssue. f . i
- 1. Allegation il.
Mr. ?nillip concluded that Allegation 41 was r.ctPhiLlip's characterizatio substantiated by his investigation." Acceptance
- is a trade term meaning hewever, is misleading.
final app:cval. Applegate charged that 1: 7.) unacceptible welds were installed _at c reject them. (Affidavit, recem=enca:: ens Mr. Phillip's detai.t ed analysis supports Mr.
*"--= solved In fact, The investigation revea' ad The welds Applegate's charge. discrepancies" in the racc:ds for all three welds.som
?N a
were installed despite these questions, (NRC Reper , a: 3.) unresc1ved after fcur years. me w .. m w
> -w-, w <w , y - -
a ' O 1 . a, *
. L
- 2.3 -
n n
.u o.w.4- 1 9 .ty. ..g. w
.gy.
. . a .. . . . . . A 4 g. ... . g .4 g. . g.o....s....a...... . .y ...... 3A .
j
...g g .t . .. g .e ~. . . . ,. s.eg g y. .. . w.. . . . 4. .. , a g . ._4 , ..., g 4 o. p. .33
. a..
w g ..$... y . =t.
. . .4. g gg rg J. 4... ... .? .4 ..f 3 4 .? .o s -. .. 1. . e A.
wy .
. S g .a.?93.3 4 4
w.e . .~ e.* .2.3 4,
-. n, gg 4 , . . . =.e
.ag .e , ,.s ..
.. .. ..g. .
.'L
..y .a.s . e ye..a.g 4a .. g a .. 2. ,.... , , ,
u, , A,. es r _' .e C.".1.-., e s ...a . < .s .-w.. ~. ' s ".e =.x am.' ..t:^- a'e. a .~..' s .' =.ad.' .
.~3
. a . .^ - ,C s s .' .* .'. v .'. a"..A .' e. . . . s' a'**_ . .' .' a v '. , a 5 . %, .u. e . ..C.'< '4'a** .
evaluaciCns C' the recC::ds aC ' ace value, dasti.:e -he
, C s s ' b .'..' ' .v ". ." .~. r. '..' .* " '. .' .. . e. e s . .
. . ' " . ' . . ' . ~ . .'. e = C .- ~. a. ~,~S, s~ ~1 a. ~, .. ~ ". ..' s --~ v e s ..' - ...a ." &' =. .-'.as.'s =.'. a srC. ".eC.% .
C .' C^a*.=.*<* a . ~.r.~. ~ =. C~ . . . .~ ' s , '. .*. ' .' .' .' ,
. .' . .* e.~. *.* * . a . w. . .'s e.~ ' ~ .~ a . e .
... a v. .". = v e .e e.a. ".a . s
. . ' .' .' . f. .. .= v. .1". a . e 'a . . ,.e,. '
.= . . -d .- s
... C _ e . -.e 4 .a .. s " ' s . .= ..d. a r44a s ...saeewa . ---
.d .. e .m1". aaa . .4
. ;.g r.. a. e s . ,ac . ,
.'.M .e"*C a. ed a- e~r..~xd a.e'v. 39% C.' w.e .'. .' ~.. e.- We ' ' a , ..- *-*.e
- '.es ". e .' .~ ' " s ,..-v . a".e.a3 a. ! =. e.- .s g .= a:'. _' .~.~. e . r ' =.W . )
s
.. . . g 4 .,.s .a .~. e , .v . . . '..'..*.'.'.'o, W a s ~. ~.~. .=... . s _' - r .' v ~.~
A.,
.. 1u.a
. . ... 2 . a.i .sega.4. n , u.e_,. ws )..
~. .,
ea .. u.a ._ _ u. . n<
, .S#,2.',.*...i'**
A
< We.'d. '~ a 3 " C .i n d.
.' *.. C *. . . C.- *. e .= .~. '. '"~
C s a .' b .* v_ .
". c
.s .o .y. g .4.
A.
- 3. . g.gg-
. e. . .~ *,. s C ' */ .' .~.g " '*. e "... . . . . ...y , .v ..
. .e. w . . 4 * .*. 4. . 2 f yy.ed .w. e .4.s s , e . ,.s.l.3.,..
.. e C .,. , a.
y
*w
... e C C .C . .' ',.'.s .# * .".s '2.h. 4 .' .'. 4 g 2. s.g **
.v. . .
, ... a . , , a 4.. ... a. .* u. .e e 4 ...wo.r.t. e.
..... . . . . .r. . .. 4 s .,.a .C . ,. ,
w.
.. . .r C . . A. ..
mo
.SSC.i ...A 24.a.....a . w..p 4. .es 1 4
. -.S . a., ... . a.$ 2. ..e.9aS
~ .:n. .sen ,
.. A.
~
w .s.
.e: v ,: . (.2.,
..- 1 . 3.I s
~a....?..
w.. ......7, .6.e e yC .. ag y4 y w . .. ....w 4. a. . _';". .*4. 4. ,g s.4 gg .*. a g .4.4 .k. g A u. s e.... . 2~.A ... s. .a .: .,, 4. . .y ,. 4 . 9.2~ i -, .s. .-a .. *..y. , .; .~. .e. . w. / y g.1. 4 .?. } .9'3 . 2g,
. wg. . a.w gg .' .J. . . m. ey. a. . ygg .= .s A 4..=.,3,,. 3.f.'.. . a. A g .J . ..m.=
-w
-.e ,,,a.4
.p , ... d .v
- w **
. . . . .e . . 4. .w.sa
. . . ., ...7.. .., s..e . w. .a a... e .
...w.e
. (- .2.)
l' ;
.} ,
+
v .3 3
. c w.o. .? gy s..t. , m,.m.'..v.g.s
- r. . wg;.,A . ' . . ' . .. r.
.. . . . .. .. .a. a.
,4 w.
4
.g k . . . .. .. ? . ..4g.w. .t. 3 %g,.ogg .. .p ..gg go.gA .
- e .*..=.
- f. %
. # _' . g '.' ".* . s ~. ~. - ". s .'*.
w , . .
. h e $- *. av. s a..d "y e. #..'* .- '. "'.S .es .S "*.d.*.* '_.* y e_* .'. a.c . .~ ~ ..~.C' .' ". .'. e. . . s .
=..w. .. g *~..ggg , .. .. ~ , .go.
- f. . g >' wa s .t .' .k e.' v. .O g..*d"C,'2 f .
'.*W-"."..=.'..'..v.
. s.g.4 .e q=.g y.. .s ?. ?..* . ..J.J 4. . g.1. ' g syg.t o g.4.. n , . J. %. . { e, .. .J. 4 . e A 9
.. , h.ef . .. .
.u.e ,.. .. .,. as.... a r. a 4 _.. a.. we. . n (*y, } eu ..ad .' ,.s .s 4,,,. 9 .a.s .u.a ,. ,eA,. SA
- x. avi_..g , "c. ".:eahC v Was ... 3 .'.*. W .."' 7 '.' ." W I'. -~.~.d""..#."....*
d d f . . / s.. ~.
?.
n.4 e ; es .4 a e s.,. w .. s.,. .C . 3 a d 74. e.?.a .a e 1 4
.. . . . .. S, .C . ..
1 -. sah.1.we ; .g ww . 34 .4 . um . .ay.aa '*' . '..~.~.e.-V.s.W.I 5 .'..#
. i
' .' .' e . . e V a. .*.
3 j 2.xe.... t .d .w. e . . A a *...f 4 a..? g . 4. .. g. w w o . 4r. . . e .. p. ... . . 6. 4.a. f.. .d . .. ... 4...
.1 ... id .4 e,, .y..p.o. a.
-f . .. g g 'w, 3 .s . A.- .4 .__4.4.2, . .4.q . . .4 apy. . g . n . '.y . ,
".a WaS ..C .# .". .*. .-
- S . *d .# .. " . * . '.GC *.q'. .'.
- Sm e.*. ,. ".1. ".t P a. . .v,
.w a .g .i .i. w g J- - . .g .J 9 .
na. 31.,. ..., g
. .e.. .g ~.a 3 a.
;. .ga .
.. ,g.
gy .e 4.. 4 .$ m, % 4...
.t. Q . v e.. .$, .~.. 2.
4 .
',t .
4 .. a.w. ..g . , .v_ . m. .u..s .s._? .4. 24 e -. 3..gg a.a.; . u. ,. .an. c ., C' n. s. ,,. .. w e,,C
.. g _~w.g * ,. g .,r e ..C . .' . * * .y"y" . a#... **....sC.'"..'.*.~
"" * * . ; -aa.#*.7, # 4.4-7,-". . s s
' it , .
j ..+2 2. f.? g, ..a. .:.....
.w.g . g a. ., WC '".k y r . .? .s.V *. .'. , " . . . * .#24 .' 24,
,g4 ,7 6. 4. a .wg_4 . ,
J 4*
. , . .. . s.t
..a T - ' -. . g;:.~. . a. =..m .,. 4..a ..=._ ys. ." M. ' a.
N
')
4
- 4. . . . .. 4.
t 2 4
. A _4.y, g . .4.3 4. . _. ;. , y7.. .g g..w . ,.., 3. .g .... a... 3 4. ... 4.a 4ade**.*.=~..*.'..f'**,..*'.""".
. . . ~ . " . * "7,"..'.'."' "..*A.'."*". a'*. # a a .#. * *;* .
I
. , e I
i- , 4c . 19 .
, : ~; . ' 'C.- 2 2. Allegation s2. -
Mr. Phillip- IEported that the allege identified five defective welds in prefabricated piping-(NRC Report, a t 10. ) , but Applegate's charge agains: the plant's prefabricated piping was f ar =cre sweeping. He merely had' identified five wells as examples of more broad-based allegations. He had passed along the employees ' estimate that about 20% of the prefabricated piping contains defective welds. (Affidavit, at 3.) Turther, he reported that KZI policy forbids repairing these defects even after radiographic detection. (Hertsgaard t interview.) The factual background highlights the seriousness of l the allegatien. The incident in questien occurred late in the ' evening of July 3,1979 -- not in Octcher, as Phillip er:cneously , sported (NRC Repc: , at 10.) A shipment of Pullman Xellogg piping was received impreperly af ter business and delivery hours. 1 Centrary to standard procedure, the pipe spools were rolled off the Pullman : uck and fell c the 7:cund. ?M was instructed Oc x-ray the pipes to ascertain the damage. Che radiographers learned that the drop hadn't damaged the piping. Mcwever, the PM x rays showed that the prefabricated piping
"% was defective on arrival. (Affidavit, a: 3.)
),. -
KII, disregarded the finding and installed :he piping i.s the> Main) Steam Relief System, a critical safe 7uard. In
- strospect, KZ: offered two reasons for ignoring PM'.s x-rays:
; (1) ?M's, instructions were "to check the pices but no: the
' welds." (emphasis added) (NRC Report, a: 10.) (2) Pullman's i
inspection sheets showed the pipes were acceptable before. shipment. ( d.) In other words, ?M was ignored because it
~ook the ini Tative to expose inaccurate records.
l l
- When Mr. Phillip investigated the charge, he merely looked at ?M's test results and ? ullman's CA racerds ( d.,a 11) ,
i an ill-advised strategy given each party's stake in the" l proceedings. Further, he didn't even disclose both sides of the paperwork. The reper: includes Pull =an's OA stamp of -
; self-approval (NRC Report, Ixhibit 3.}*/ but it dcasn't j contain the documents with ?M's original findings. Iither Mr. Phillip arbitrarily emitted key evidence and abused his authority in the p ccess, or the records are Ics: and the
, utility violated the terms of its license. :?S-1, ISAR
! 17.0.1.1, 17.1.17 (1973). - l As a result of his p:che, Phillip fou?.d C3&I in . acaccmpliance with 10 C7R 50, Appendix 3, Criterien .T7, fc:
;,.,) releasing the pipes and not using
- hold tags.
- But the
( Lp evidence suggests : hat scre than a minor paperwork violatica l was involved. Phillip discovered tha :he pip,es were released 4 D
. - , . , y ..r n, . . . __ . - , ,.,m,. en. .n . . _ . ,.,m - . , - - , ,
[ i m a .s. a.e e.- w.e f a. - a,e.et
. Sc e.-.Sss, f. . e ... .s ...
..s
.. 4 . .
v e . _w.e s- r.
?. p.4.e,.e s 5 t tase a .a (. ". .:., ; . .e rc., -. a.t..4 . ) r. . . . w- .e ,
. ...4 w. .w.e a . ..
. a eA- .- s a r c .e e --d . 4.a + ( . .w .*...,..A
. .. 4e 4.. e s .4 .....1... e .. . .
4 r4.aG .._) c ..a.e ed .w.e. e.a C..- en . C .n. . .... t. . r e I.sc.. .. 1..e. e.t 4 . a ... . .- c. . ._" .. .-. n... e . e , c _- . a.~.^ * .e e.'c v. '.. e e ". e ~.. .*,.' . .~., .' .. - installa.ica 'ed::e.L: : was declareci acca::ahle.. . G aC Repc::, c.. 4 w
--4. .i.
. Surely this 'inding raised seriets ques.icas ahet: the
-. . a c. - .v. c'
*.e ", r.-,.q:an a.. .'.~..-e . . .. s "s. .u _' ' *.av e s ~ra .%ed a ...c e .' .~. ~.n . s ' "e .' ..v e s . .' ~, a ..'. ~ .~. . 3 u . .". . . ...----
. . . .'"* 'nas ~....s... .. .
~. ...c ' " d e "._' s 'ec. .k
- v. .~ .~..". .' . . _4 . .q ' . e .".. ". ' .- " s : a re.-N. c .'s. v i . .' a - ' m. . .
- . se-,p .. ,e.n... .w , a e .. " ..".a .- . ' .e y g ,u.
.. ..g , _.
u ,., y u. . ~1, e.x ,.- . ,a ~ . .. a .=. s s n",- . a. ce e:< '1 ' ' ss'- .e'- g.ry Ly. . .. %. , w . 3 ..a. s _4 . 7 n,. c. .,.u. s 3 _4 .. . .4 2 p.. . .... g . g, g s ..p g g 2 4 .. 4 -- 4 a g . 4.. . . . a ..a C 6. ...4 3 aqa.4 .s. :.3. (. ..e - g, 1. 3y. i .' a . ...q . .- r ' u .. s " e ~ ' ._' s '. a a-s , .u . ' ....._-f"' 5 .'. .' S c ..'." e ' ,. 1". ". .'. '. e d . 4
- ...,e s . 4.: g 4 7 _w.e g.a.c + e .
44 . . . , 1n4 .3. . .4.. . a. .. 4.~e_. . 4 m..i .,a.m- . e_4 srec.ed _w.e sa.a se_
. .- ,s.---- a.ad
,,s-4
- 2. 4 , , , 3 .s w a 3 3 e..--- m.'s . equ'es . "..' s . ' . e '.e . a d ' e. . .*. r.'.e s ...
.-. ,c. ,.ad* v, aq:eed w' -
" ".e ". a- .'-.-- sr
't '. 3 , .'320 .. .as.s. n. .'. 3. /-
Repc::, a: 13.) Ecwever, 3:. Philli; knev :: shen'd have , g
. . cy., .. ". a . ' . S a ' ' eya ,._' ~.. ~... , s. ' a " - 4_.a . ed _',.- ' .. ., w a s '.a s ed
.. 3 . 4..3-4... .. :- a 4 3 ,u_,., w . .y e , . ..2,.1 w.".~, x *v.s'
. - ".e ve?ds -
1.a- ..,.,,. . . , . . e s .w.em , 1a .. .- ,.._,..1, y .. . s .u. 4 - e^
- '.e .' re s " . A. a -
" e ' - . - c . a ._' ~.. ' s s e a ' c' aer.-va'.
. - . ". '."._'e .=*-_ a c k..a w
...z . .. z u. . u .
y -e. .. u.ga. u.s,.. 24._.,g ..d uns ".'a
. .'...e".se .asa~u.e..
- o esmair. si' ant. Phi'. lip even heard I:nes: A'. dredge, ?M's t, f..e s .4 .a e., . w..a a .. e 4.. e . .. s t..' a . As acw-.e-- a s4..$.,.ce
. . _4 . ..e
.w
..u .'. e a- .d ..d" s ..-v. . *
('. . a r. s e 3 e- . . ' .a e sc. d. - ' .., a. ' .v.av. 6,. . t
, ; 3 a n. ..y s_. , a . 4.. .. ue a ,e.. ..<.....a
. . , .,.::_ - , ,,.,g.
. . , na .-
v.~
-- .. e s n -- =? , e , -
t 1: 2, attached as Ixhibi: ) ("Aldradge ::anscrip *)
.eas.4 - e ".ese . ..d_'.'an.s,.v . . S'..' ' .' _' , a c . r.c. .ad v'_ * .. u .
l ' w-" a --- _ a .' a. n ' M ' s '
". e s u s f .' .. ' us _ v. .- ~..c -- a . . . v.
w.1- ..o --.w4 s.*. q ' ".. _ ..ad wegp.y ..q.
.c l
. ,os4._4.n. . . *y w - . . .
Ia
- 3. Allecanica 43. . .
.t . . . 4
..". ' s al ' ac. a _' .* *. . ,- . e s . s a 3.".. . . ." . .#.-.m .-ix 'eeks .-
q , .7-. css.. e .2 2 4 ,.
, Wo .4 . u..e ..*..sn'4
. . 7, . . tSa ..4.. f.f 4. .;.
c - . s'
^
' . e '. ' ".s .. . . . k.
'. 5 . .' .'. _' .3 e - =. r ..". a .
. d .4. . J.,.. m .w.. . 9 , 4 ,., . b..de .4 .-. eawe". - a- =. =..a. 3.. .3. .. ... _
. q_
. . .- . .. .. .. ...w. (,.* *4 ;. .C 7..., . ,$ . g ,
2."..'.'.~y '.es ...-. ev=a', "..cueva , ".a. '.e .'~= a.. *.., v=s
' .= ". .' e . , a ~.~...~r
. . . ' ' a.' . a ',', c .". .' .
- a s s . _' .. e ' .1 . '1s ~
=..x f ec .s?
wa w , a4 .... ( a .) 4
. s. ,. . %..A.- A 3, .. 4. ...s ..,
. J. ..
.. ya.a_.a
.4 . e_,
s'..
. ' . . y~. ~,. .a s . .-~. e- 5. 8. .s - . . .
. . aaa_s ".e ".,4-4... e =. -=~....ed
" s a4ef e. , 4 ..,,.t.. wy .
w
.3 . d4 - ..edig .-. .f 1.4 ... w. 3 .y -r .y .. . wa w e.g3
'--' ". s .w. ed . a ' e :. ~..s - - = -- . e '. _= _ -
s.'....."., - _' ' . a.. .--=.. .a' . c._. .
.w.e .J- . a.... ,
. .4. 4.. 24sg .a.. 4....,...= ......4.....-a "3. ,., , .4.-._? _. w 4
. w..., b. g .. a y y . e,, .... . .. . . ;.
, . ...... . . a. 4 . .; 3 ga .-
2.s. ........a .... . ... . . . .. . 4 . .. ...g
==
- g.s.3 J. . . $ . .... 4 a 5 s
- 4 '. ". . . . . . =.". j ... e. b* .~a *.d* .' *...
*=
- 4,. s a .3.s * , 3-**.s- -. a=
I 1 I l 1 -- , -
^
?..
s -
. By May 1980, when :'r Phillip conducted his investiga:icn, the flushing p ccedure had been judged substandard twice .
since January 1979. (NRC Repc::, at 9.) Phillip's curicus claim in the general su==ary'that "pechle=s in :his area have been identidied and resolved" (d., a ) was generous, to say the least. . When the report 71s filed in July 1980, CG&I's nonce =pliance had been excused for 15 =cn:hs. Phillip apparently decided tha: the allegation need not be pursued, because ratesting tentatively was se: fer Su=mer 1980. ( d.) Since CG&I had been unable to pass an inspection for so lEEg, at a minimum Phillip should have recc== ended tha: the NRC
=enitor the st=rer flushing p:ccedure. .
- 4. Additional Allecations.
These allegations fccus on the harass =en and retalia:icn against ?M, referred to abcVe on May 5, 1930, subsequen: Oc the NRC visi:s to immer. Applega:e recceded conversa:Lons with three individuals f cm ?M managemen:. PM had been
" thrown off" a job for the firs: ime in its cc perate history.
Mr In the taped conversations, PM cfficials, including confirmed tha: the radiographers had been fired 6 for pushing sco hard on safety viola:icas. con. A1 dredge, firmed a break-in and thef: cf quality con :al racc:ds at the PM ::ailer. Mr. A1 dredge also Most significantly, A1 dredge emphasi:ed that he could not critici:e the utility publicly, or ?M would be blackballed within a mench. In fact, A1 dredge was concerned that his ccmpany might be driven to bankrup:cy if it secod up ec the utility. (Aldredge transcrip:, at 1-3.) Adter listening to this taped conversa:icn, Mr. Phillip spcke with Aldredge. Aldredge new fcund nothing wrong. He reported that his firm had not been forced c accept faulty ' welds. .of course, centrary Oc Phillip's characterization, Mr. Applegate did not claim tha: ?M was pressured to accept had work. (Id., a ) Rather, he charged tha: ?M was being pressureE to remain silent about all the everrides of the radiographers' refecticas. Aluredge's contradiction with the earlier tape was predictable. In the tape A1 dredge explained why he had c deny that KII s=d CG&I had applied imp Oper ressure :o obtain quality assurance racerds, for exa=ple. Su: Mr. Phillip accepted the shift in posi:ica at face value in :he resc::. 2d there were any detbt, a time-line chronicle to PM's final =cnths at i==er reveals hcw Phillip's "see no evil" conclusica cverlocked the cbvicus:
u.- .
.*.1.".".1."*/ '*7 , .? . .. S C t.'"...* . 4.* 2.0* .
a *r":. *."1. S. ****S . ... .~ .~ .~. ". *. . 3 a . .' .*.*. S
..e . 4 a . A. 4 . .,. .sw..,,3
.. ..w. .g g .a .4 . . g g .s .. .f g .S.*.*. .4 -
r.. . . . . . . . . ..3..
.. . S. .ua ....s. 3
. g a. .. w g g. g . ed. *1. . 4 ". .?*S3 . " .# ~. ~..". .. .* " . "..". .' *. S S ..". .* V, S.**y . .
. e... 4.y . g s . t. . n., g.u.C L. . ..... .c g.g. .s . 8 . . .,. .. $
r .. 2 2.,.o.1. .y .~. g .* .a 3 .
- t. arr.- .3t .a. n 1 9.r.A.tS.) .
* ?
- 2. . a n.u a . ./ . .* 3 3 . *%..
. g. g .is a . v. 3 .3. .d.*"w3 "..S & *< .' .". ** .
wS .w t S .J . S , 1 S,..JS
. .S. epa . 1 .4 .i$.. . . .
. . A. ..
. J.
. . ...../S
. . . S4..*
..e
* .? .JS 1S f.4 .? .2S 9d. (4.4. S.m4 A 3 . 1 e, 1. 1.)
y .w .? , 13.30 .
- 3. .1 ... 39
. . scs.4 .aS .. . . .4.e
. . . +.3 . ,
.. g.m.. .a . g i .., s... g . y .. y
.y.g .%..e g * .
g ....ge.. *
. . . . .. . g,7 y.- -3 . . . . .. a. .J -a.
f a.. e.s .e .J.&.I 4
..,1 . .t e . )
ar.4., ----9, .33.. e .
- S. . v. . :.u. -9a .a o. s. S .u.e 4
-,. a .4 . a , .S.....e .,
.a .i. .* .. C,.
... .J. S
.. .% J., ..
4
, 1 . .......4....S
. . . ........ . 1A w.. ,. ..4 Sd
.. , ..S.J9 w.. e 4. 4 .1. A.* .J .
. 3 A 9 t 1... .. w & 1C.. .S.4
.. - . . . A. . 6. $ 4.Co G .. S..
. . .s .=. g .Ja. .s. g " b. g 3 33.33. .33.33..4
.J
.. .J. .a. . a . a . .- m. C .' .' .' . *
*4 t.% . s.Ay 6 . . .s.. 3 C.- 4. f.. , 1. 3.)
. M.r s4,.- t 3, .', O , .v.av. .' 7. , ?. 3s w* " . ".t'.:.C . S d SW s .-
- c.. '.S .
+
- 1. 4 .. e . .. s d S.:e L.*< S .. *4 . w. ..&. . q e e . . r . A. C .o.e.'/
u rw .. )
.u.3y 3, *
-* 5Ta.a
- 3. , t 3 3 0 .-
. a'ry .-=.C. .. 'a- w - .. *. .* *. .-aa . .d w .. S *Ad . '.
.u.v. .: . a. g J. g .. . a - .4. . ,. A ., g g..A
. ...g
.a .
.. . q .- .z.u. g gc,z. . 3. =.m.. q :..M.
g C.?q.. .. @. 9 d 3 a g -*g .a
.. g
- J * *g . . g =.'*. g a. .J. *..'.
.a ~*
- g g*.* *. 4 ". 9 g . .?. 3 3.
-. ... "* g J
A... g 3 3.3 C . . J. .wg 24 ~
.f 13 .w$ '5 3.'.*.*.*.C,*. "...*."y".".*.".". ** '.* S 4 y. a. g ...4. y g. .. .. .. . g .h.J 1
.-e.p ; g . , 3w. . . . . 4..., y. s. .
3.}
~ *
- o. .u.g y 3, * .g30 .
, M..ty y . Sca ". *. * .. * *. . .3 C . .~a O.'...'.*..*.'." g W.# ". . . SW m y .e.J . g .
.. , .J. .. .. 79 u.. y .s. J. - .. . g .4. ..g,. . . ay.?a.e,s
- y. .. g .tgy9 . .
.w
.a .***S
.?
. . . . 2. g ,.. t.
. . . A.ay .
s .% S.J , ,. g . /. a* J 4 e gy.e . , .. . S .S. . l-t. l: 3. .v.Sv .".e , .'330.* ^
...4.'.'.i.-
, . .. .a C . s ". a. 3 ..d . .'.*rd- ' " a '
- X S C"w"..'.*/ 4 S W I*.*. W 6." t
- S C *..*. #. *. d w* .*. .V.2 .*/ 3' . ". .". S V. #. * *.*.7 4.# .". ~.,
*f.. *
- S S u : * ^, . * ^. 'y ~y ~ ~.*1 9 .
Sd *.4 9.1 '. S .
. I. '.1'. .C .A S CC.'~. , 1.
~
.' .3 . )
-e W4 w "
.. .3 .. . "..C .? **C, ,*/ 1.". d . %' ' ' ." S d "34'a* .* d5...#3 a* .* .* ". S W 9.". .* . " . " " . .
*...* C C ~: .*. , .\ ~r*y"' .'.
- Ca . S l .' S C :..
. . ** *
- V4 .d ed ~..$. " e S "V . %.*.'.*.". -.- **d. 3.". *- ".*.*y .*
- V. a. 3 S i
,J. . co, ..g g. .
. . . . , . q..
.. .. g, '... . g .,.y . -w... g . . .y .. a..-
a .. . . . . .~. ~. . k* "f' .I- ' .C * .'...#.*.**. ** . ! z.y
. . .4A3 24 a.g. . Jag. , .u.t e . - - ..q ga.a. ... s A 4. .... s p -.. a. . S e t . .. .
r s. a. a. a.
.w3. .. ,.q.n ..g. 5. .v. gg g g y w.g d .* e *.*.". .. .'. .d
". a
~~
- v. .~N - "..'s a
. . g 7 .4. a. g
.y = =.
- J. a. gh.g. gg .yg a. ..*J g.w. g . gg .g s.s m. e..m .?. .J ..
t . 6 . .
. . . , .. 4. . .J =.1 wgy . W.g b. .*..J
- gg w. g .4 4W e. t *
.. . , j .a . sayy.
- a.c; .s . 3 . 3 ==p a. g . /' . ' ...' * ?
O..w. . . f.4. .
...s.g g y .-. ..
? *
.s. q.%. .. g.g . .a f. yg
.g s. y i..J. s. ... . a 4.. %. . a .i . . wya. . g .- . . .
I w,a. .Ok. *1J f *= f a. . sy. . ,g g g a 4. . . ... , a r=y= .t. s.e 3. . a. r f 1 .s y m. A
. ..w.e .V. ., y. *
. a.,.e s .s. . . s.w. 4 .* t .4 .s .
g .u. . 3t. . y. .a.y .
.4
_w
.. . a. . .s. .J _. 3.,v. .
.. . .44_4..
l
- n. . 4..t .t. 4..
- . 7.. ..3 wg. .:...w.
. g.*..sy. .... . .?..J, A w.g
...s. y gg 4 4.:. 4 w:
...wg
- s. yy g . my44g3 4
. . _4 *4 4
.. ....-...;.r /. .y.a.q .:. . ., . , .. .s. . .
,...p, .. , g~ a. v, ea. ...g .. y .J .w.a . g a. .,. .- . J. ....' .t.
n 4
..w. 2...
.w. .. .. .. . . . a . 4 .4 u. . u..
- 4>
y .
. w..S. .. . w. a. * . ..
2....
. . . . . .... ,. ,g.* a. y .
a4 .a
... s. . g g s..q p ..3. 4. . . A. . .J . w4... - q * :
,s. . 4 77..y 43..3 3 .; . .a.. .J
.- .. . . a
.'.t.
.J .4.a.y . o.... a . / .O g yr=..
s
.o . 6. gy *
- 4. , *3]
.. .. *.* .a.. - ga . .' .a -* ..w ,3 .*
- m. s. * ##
. 4"O. 3 a . .s. - - 2 4* a* .* a- . .s. . . . -
."J. .a. g .' . s. .* O.
. g .T. .*. .'. a- 2 . . .J
. 2., . i. *. a. y, . J*
( _ _
O A , O
.s o w 11/ Phillip's characteri:a:icn cf 3uckley's respense also conflicts with the public racerd cf the meeting. On the recc:d, 3cekley stated :ha: the 73: might investigate and p csecute if Ic-quested by the NRC. (Gic dano, "T3: Shif ts Charges c NRC,
Cincinnati Incuirer, May 9, 1980.) Phillip imp cperly pc ::ays Buckley's evaluation as the final' rejection of the ecverup allegation. In fact, Buckley was stating that the NRC would have to de its job before he cculd do his. VIRITICAT!CN STUDY
- ne Oc the sericus -=-"-= cf Mr. Applegate's charges,
. Cm' .S -- ..d -" c - a d =.~. " ..". s u a ' ' .v '--- u,4 ve dc=-' .7 s .".A v. -- determine the reliability and accuracy of his discicsure. Law enforcement officials f:cm the local to the national level have confirmed Applegate's credibility as an investiga:cr. Jcurnalists and reper:ers who conducted their cwn verification studies of Mr. Applegate's initial charges have confirmed the accuracy of his facts. GAP has conducted nu= arcus confidential interviews with Zi==e empicyees who cer:cbcrated facts behi-d the charges. Mr. Applegate's landlady even has confirmed that she and Mr. Applegate have been :hrsatened with physical vicience. Finally, Mr. Applegate himself has p cvided =cre than enough facts and suppc ing evidence --
- ape recc dings, investigative field reports
, sworn statements
-- to enable a reasonable persen :c conclude tha: these sericus charges are accurate. .
GAP dcas not undertake permanent representation of any client before receiving approval f:cm its Whistlebicwer Review ?anel. The Panel is ccmpcsed of two well-kncwn govern-ment whistlebicwers, Dr. Fred Greenhut and Or. Tony Mc:ris; a public interes atterney, Andra Cakes, Esq. ; and a former . Administrate: of GAP, Ms. Marjorie Bernard. On Ncve=ber 20, 1980 the Review Panel unanimously concluded that Mr. Applegate's charges are based en a reasonable belief, and approved GAP's representation and called for a full investigation cd his allegations. - CONCLUS:CN
- n our opinion, the citizens of Cincinnati are still wai:ing for the NRC to de its job. In a men h's undercever werk, Applegate was able to find widescale theft, drunkenness, black market operations, videscale faulty piping in key safety systems, fire hazards and '--"- -=-* ' - = - 4 n agains: :he mo st
- s. cuali y-conscicus e=plcyees a :he plant. In app:cxima ely a
'? =cn:h verification study, GA? was able := confir= Mr.
Applegate's asser:icn that his disclosure represents only the tip of the icebu:7 -- chare may be ever 'a de:en additional 4
. .. --e
- 9 8 9
. . , . . e - - - *
- e e
= 4 .o, =.
i g g .Eg.. . .f J. g .Jgg. g .a. . *'-.=g.** _ . .
- h. .a. =. =..%. 3 g =.* 5.*. **. 3 " ..' . ' . " . . ' . ' . . ... 3.".".-*.*,
rr.te,2**O I r,A. I'a =4*--. .*. *. *
.y- *4
. , . A t
.a1 O*= I
- s -- a* *=* *a O ** -b*s$ **
*** - * * * * * * * * * * * * * - * *6* S
.g g .4 . _4 .y
- e. g, . . se 4 A.J .E .4 .J.g.7 4 _. , g. 9** a .
- y
_4 .g W
. . .. g.m.
- 4. =r ) ... ; g. p . e .J .3..
af ,...
. . E. e .
2 v. -. a. n ... .s s . , .".. . .D. . .'. .' .'. 8 e ' 3 A r.* . 4,..b. .a. b.. .' s . 2 5.*f. S e.~.* 4 J
.c
.
- 2 .' . . " b. e 3 C .'...# & .?. , .1 b. e_a- ".1."*. '*.'.*"*.*.*S.**
". e .# * * ' .?. 3 .-**v.
g ... . 1 .f ., e . g :
. .. vn g.. _4.a. e _e . .4 e S , . s. . 4 .* .* 4 y s ..e ye g . : . .,1 . 9g ,e -
y a '. e . -
. ....3
,,..g ge. g .. . . _ - . .s
. 3 .' .' e ~. . .' '~. e 3 . .-v. a.~.^. ". e . . 1". . e ,- ~_ _' .~. ~., ~ ". e
'enials neariv.
a: ' ace value. Philli .h s
".u_' k . _"
. . '.e ev ' ' e..c s,
_ n' ,-r.' ac. a .a .~..~~.v_' e .*.'. n p .even ' . ei33nc .1:~. sd. . .' *. e
..w.e.
.u.
. . g gg..*. .s v. =._ e ..=.d .'.-.1.'..'a. . ' . ' . . ' . . ' . s .' .' ~. e -. *. s c u. .. e s 4 -w
-.e
.,..,e .. 9 _. . , .u
.a. 3.a. .te.... .e .4 ..a. 1
. . . . .: w.
. 4 .* .t .4 y ..3 . .. . f. .
.v.g t
3_4 , . g ,
-.g ..4.,.,?. g.. . 4.
3 . g. , .t.4 g 4. ....g g _. 4 , .,. . 4 ....
.. . ..a.. .g.... r..
1S . . . . .4.. 1 _... e . ..4 e _a .sSC.4..e ... . ... *3.4..
. .., .r
..._ . . .. . . . A _. e; . . , ..e
...<a 4s ., ... ,e
. . ._4. . .4 e s ..., w..,4.,. . . .
Respecchily 3thmi::ed , . Rachel 3e2.11s a .. A e.4 n33.43 _.2 .. F
""hc=as :evins Asscciate 0:.recter
!.cuis Clark 2
W 4 eC _., l l 1 . .... . 9%
/
l *' l l l .-ae=
. , _ . + g -
3
- _, n . . _ . _ . . - . .
I j usersostar s' I
. /p%$8e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS51CN N3
- naasen un i
'y; y2 y g
m neesavaa.r=omo - j ei.a= su.va. uw.eis wsv Docket No, f0-358 OtJt,, 2 G20 - 5 Cincinnati Gas and Elec=ic b Company
. AT2N: Mr. Earl A. 3erymann 71ce President. Insiseering Services and Ilectric Produe:1on 139 East 4th Screet Cincinnati, CE 45201 Gentleman:
21s ref ers to the isvestigation condue:ed by Massrs. G. A. ?hdp, K. D. 'Jard and 7. Z. 7andal of this offt:a en April 7-9 and 20 May 1-1 and 20,1980, of ac 1vi:1as at de 'Ja. 3. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station authorized by Construe:1on ?armi: No. C??R-38 and to .he dis-cussion of our findings #.2 Mr. 3. K. Culver and others at .he conclu-s1on of ha ensi:a portion of de i=ves:13ation m May 2,1980.
.s 31s investigation rela:ed .s allega:icus concerning installed safe:7-t rela:ed 717123 Se enclosed copy of our investiga:1cs report identi-Q fias areas ami,ad during de investigation. *Jidis dose areas, de investigacion consisted si an examinatics of per.isant records and procedures, independen: evaluations and is:ervisus #_.h personnel.
During this investigation, :ar.als of your ac:171:1es appeared :s be is sancompliance vi:1 NRC :equirements, as described in .he at. ached Appendix A. 21s socice is sent to you pursuanc :o de 7:cvisions of Sectics 2.201 ! of de NRC's "3nies of ?ractes," Part 2. *.1:la 10, Code of Federal Regula:1cas. Section 1.201 requires you :o subm1: :o dis office vi dis
-*Ty days of your recaipt of his .ctice a vri::en satement or expla-I sacion is reply, including for each 1:en of coneosplianca: (1) ecerec-
.dve
. action .aken and .he re,sul.s achtsved; (2} ce=ec d.ve action to be
- akan :s avoid fur.her sencomplianca; and (3) .he data rhen ful:. :cm-711ance v11'. be achiaved.
In accordance vid See:1on 2.790 of .he 51C's "Rulee of ? ac d.ca," 7ar: 2, Ti:.la 10, Code of Federal Zagulaticus, a :cpy of .his lac ar, de e enclosures, and your response :o .his lattar will be placed is de 51C's Public Documan: 3com, except as fc11ovs. 2f he enclosures :entain information hat you or your contractors believe :s be ;repriatar7, ycu
=ust apply is wri.1st :s .his office, vi:h12 five days of your reca17:
of. .his lac:ar, := wi.hhoLi such informa:1:n from public disclosure.
,, 3e application muse include a full sta amen: cf da reasons'fsr wht:h (ye de information is considered. proprie:ary, and should. be prepared so cae propriacar7 i= dor =ation idactified is de applinatice is :en:21 sed is an enclosure :s de applicacion.
ATTACW ENT 4
.A e >'r7 2 r
V () { L[ ~& '-
. . . - - - , , _ . . - - - - -+---yp:---wg- -------------w
e e 1 I w { l ef ==4 == e4 Ces ama Ematrie Cowner SA. 2 sm Ee will sladly diaeuse aar tenecias you h ve --- f=+_ $1s ~~ j h t W atas. .
+
81asere17, James C. Imppiar stres==r i Baalamurest l 1. Appediz A Encias ed 74 al ard amn 1
- 2. I:E '.aspestiam .
Import Es. St>-353/M l es e/emals: 1er. J. L Sehet:. 71ame !- Superf se ===dme I Cameral Files . Impredmettaa hi: IRC l%h F5E ,-
!asmL 752.
E2C "c Eers1A 7. Islas, Puser 31:1ag
-l ew %
l C1:1amms Agadast a W *a==-*ve Enri.e Esim 7. Evans, Stata af Chia i i . s _& CW \ C lC / lCs , / Q v 'M ll ~ j M *2iev m m )4'Jart MW 'I 7anda'p- 34 m- # i tse . -C'QW i
**n,t*
t_ 7Ds-t* 7-1 ** i ./ I j l MT1 >6 ..<w l
/ J_
k l g- S
, a
- a .
(
.5 .
s.
.s
*s e.G ,
'/*
Appggdig A NOT CZ CF 7:CI.A-'ICN
- a 1.
T cf ~d-ci Gas and Electric Docket No."30-358 C3apany K-3ased on de resul:a of the NRC !svestigation conducted on April 7-9 and 30, May L-2 and 20,1980,1: appears dat certa 1= of your ac:1vi:ias vere soc conducted is full compliance .rith NRC requirements as coted below. This i:en is an infrac ion. 10 CTR Part 50, Appendix 3 C 1:arion 17, states is part . hat "Maasures shall be established s control saterials, parts, or :omponan:s which do
! not conforz :o requirements is order to prevent dair isadvertent usa or isstallation."
- a. The Henry J. Kaiser Co. Zimmar Quali:7 assuranca Ma:ual is Quali:7 Assurance ?:ocedure (QA?) No.16 requires in part hat "All son-conforming 1:eas vill be segregated, where possible, from acespt-l abla items, clearly idan~.1fied vd.2 de applicable Hold or Def t-ciency Tag and doc:.cnen=ad on de Nonconformanca Repor..* I:
T additionally requires .hac "* pon 7e:1 fica:1on da: all work on :he 4 1:en is complace and acceptable. .he conconfe::sanc4 report (NR) La a signed off is See:1on 13 by .he ::spector." contrary to .he above, 5 pipi=g spools idctified by NRE-19 tl Rev.1 were alassed from ses ega:1on even . hough de ::spector had signed off section 13 v1:h a :etation of specific e captions to acceptab111:7 of de material by iden _df7 ing another N1 con::alling- ,
.he material. I't.ia relasse was achieved .hrough unauderized removal of de noted exceptions on .he N1.
- b. l'ha Henry J. Kaiser Co. 7.1:ener Quali:7 Assuranca Manual in Quali:7 Assurance ? ocedure (QAP) No.16 requires in par: dat ". ..
sacarial is clas:17 identified as conconforming and is segregated, when possible. Due to size id*:ations physical segrega:1on say be impractical. In such instances .agg1=g, =arking, or oder saans of identifica:1on is acceptable." Additionally QA? 13 requires da:
"A ' Hold' .ag is placed on de i:em . .. *: is used is :en-junc:1on vi h a 'Nonconformanca lepor:' ."
~
Contrary to :he above, 3 piping spools identified 12 N1 E-2000 as senconform1=g and required :o be cleared by addi:1ccal :ss:s, :oc only had been released from .he varehcuse, bu: is addi:1on had been isstalled widout any "holi" :ag being placed on ca sa:arial. e 9 4 Jn .
-- p.m #
9 OOODW 5 _
~
! ~ l
. s t
f' s1J.)
,_,> 7.5. NUC*IAK IECUI.ATCRT CCl@.ISSICN OFTICI CF INS?ECTICN AND CITCRCId.IN*
RIGICN II ,. a
- i. ~
7 3epor*. No. 50-}$8/80-09 - Dockee No. 50-238 I,1 cense No. C??R-38 I.icensee : Cincinnati Cas and Elec::1: Company 129 East a-J: Screet Cincinnati, CE 45201 Tard ' ' :7 : 'Ja. 3. Zi:ener Nuciaar Power Station Investigation At: Moscow, CH Chicago, II. Daces of Investigacion: April 7-9 and 30, .May 1-1 and 20, 1980
- nvestigacors: - c~ - [// '/
' GT A. ?h1111p / ' 3dte
~
WJ7 7/J (C. 3. *dar:t; 7/;/rc
' Jatle G*
. E.'7andal 6l'y l
$~%-&
'Da t a Reviewed 37: N
- W 7 'Z *"" 74 E. Nore11us [ 3 ace Assistant to he Director ffd '
I h
- 1. C. Knop, Chiat gact Construe:1cn Projects See:1cu L
' Investiration Su::=nar r *nvestigacion :n Acril 7-4 and 30, Mav I' and 20, L980 ( Racer: No. 50-353/90-39)
Areas :svescizatec: 3ecause of al~ega:1 =s made ,,ri:narily relating :s
- he adequacy of piping velds, per:'c ned a review of records and proceduras ,
M s tk qMO
,00-
. . , e i
. w s made indeoenden: evaha:1:ns and c: due:ad is:are.eus of serscenei. '
"e 1 vestiaa:ica i:volved M isves:14ati:= hours 's7 .hree i:ves.12a: :s.
Resul:s: Of four allama:1:ss =ce, unich related :s .he 1:sta'.14:1:e of m:n-faa:1: aced simi s hav.:s f af ac:17e velds, was Ja:" ="7 subs:an:14:ed is that :he sises were iss:allad bef::a sues:1:ss :ssa:diss E. air actas -
.; abill:7 vera resolved. Cue 1:an of :occ maliases, as 1 frac @cs. was f idtatified: (1) 10 021 30. Acceediz 3. 0.- :arios I7. :aleast of sa.arial f::a ses:esa:1on and failure :s 2se hold : ass.
O T I ; I. , t l S 5 6 6
== e-n, - - - -
9
- RIASCN FOR !37ES** CAT *CN on February 23, 1980, an isdividual who :entac:ed :he NRC by,,:elephoen sede allegations regarding the *4s. 3. 11=ner Nuclaar ?over Sez:1os. Cne 1 of :hese allegaticas was dat piping having def active velds Khd been
~
instaned is a safecy-related system. O e- . SU20!ARY OT ?AC 3 Touov1:s .he receipt of anega:1cus by :alephone on February 23, 1980, arrangzsents were sede :o iste: view .he allager to obtais more detailed informacion. During an interview on Mars 3, 1980, .he isdividual made several allegations, .hree of which involved sat:ars A' der he f urts-diction of de NRC. 37 letter da:ed March 11,1980 .he alleger was advised dat an investigation vould be condue:ed regarding -lose anega-
- 1ons which were as fcuous:
, 1. Def ective velds is safecy-related sys: ems have been accepted, among den were velds CY606, E141 and K3tl.
- 2. Five def ective ve3ds were identified is prefabriac:ed pipiss but de pipes were accepted and iss:siled is a safery-related system.
- 3. The sanser is which safec7-related instaned piping was fhshed was
,; isadequace and a scheduled six-veek fhsh was reduced :o :vo weeks.
An ega:1on No. I was so:'substanciated. Anegacion No. I was par:1any substantiated is .hac three of five iden.1-fled pipes had been instaned is :he mi t steam relief system before ques-ticus as to -deir acceptab111:7 had been resolved. ?.ro i: ems of noncomoliance were identified is this regard. Is was also deter 31 sed -la: at :he :1se of de investigacion a ecuconforming reper. :equiring disposi:1on :=mm49ed open concarsing the acceptab111:7 of .he cree pipes. Ouring the isves:1ga:1on additional avami-=:1ons were sade of .he pipes and . hey were deter =1 sed :o i be acceptable. l Regarding Anegacion No. 3, i vas de:e...d. sed' hrough -cusac: vid the primary source of the information ucon .tich .he allegation was based,
.ha: he had Rf .he site is November 1978 and problems is -dis area had been identified and resolved -2 rough NRC inspectices condue:ed beeveen November 1973 and .he receipt of -la allega:1ons i~ March 1980.
i Following ecmpletion of de isves 1gati:s a: the *.ismer si:e, -d e ausger contacted Region !*1 and anaged he had evidence of z cr* d-al S S,D . ! . ;-= ,
': P."
~ .
3-- .. ,
w conspiracy and .ha: the velds an .te 2:se above-nen:1:ned pipes had 'see:
- u sue and :spaired during the ::urse =f ::e inves:1gs:1:n a=d .his informa:isa was vi:hhald f::a de RC. " e 'sasis for dose allega:1:es, enich :ensis:ed of rece:di=gs of .hree :alephone :enversa:1:ss, was co-
* = d -M fr:a de alleger duriss an is:erview :s May 3, U8C. 'No i=-
forma:1:n or evidence vaa obtaised :: ::: firs case allaga:1:ns duri:3
-_ de i=:erview or furi 3 subsequen: 1:ves:13a:1:n. t I Cne 1:en of concenplia:ce, an 1: frac:1:n, was iden:ified dart =g $1s i ves:1ga: an.
f 9 4 e t a e S e B e W g e l t
. e i
. T p E. 3E"' AILS .
N
- 1. Persons Contacted
, Cincinnati Cas and Elee:rie Cer?anv (CO*,E) f
-2. ,a.
*B. I. Culver, ? oj ect Manager
? *W. 7. Schwiers, QA Manager
*R. L. Wood, QA Engineer
*D. C. Kramer, QA and S E=gineer S. Swain, Construe:1cu Manager
*J. 7. Weissenberg, QA and S Iagisee:
Iaiser Enriseers. !=c. (IE!)
*t. Marshall, ?:ojec: Superistenden:
*E. 7. Knox, QA Manager K. 1. 34ungarten, QA Manager
- 1. M. Dorr, Construe:1ou Ingiseer A. Pallon, Welding /NDE QA Engineer T. Oltz, Analysis and ? ccedures $'.pervisor, QA t J. Deerwester, Supplier QA i
- 3. Haag, QA spector Feabodv Tes 1=1r Services (?eabedv)
Ernes: Aldredge, ? ssiden: Charles Wood, Manager, Cinc1=nati Office (via :alephone) Wayne Draffon, Supervisor (via :alepheca) Alan Sellars, Field Supervisor
- 3. Surdsal, Laval !! Isspec:ce Nuclear E=ert-r Services , !:c. (' TEST
- 1. Sott, NDE Supervisor
- 1. A. *ieber, NDE !sspector
- 2. Istroductica on February 23, 1980, the Offica of :: spec:1cu a=d I:fs :enen: NRC Headquartars advised Region !!! of a :alaphone conversa:1 n vi:h an individual who sade allega-1ces :enes: sing activ1:1as at :he "Ja. 3. *.izmer Nuclear ?cuer ?lan: Casse uc 1cn si:e. a d :sques:ed
. thac .he individual be contac:ed. Later the same day duri:g a : ale-
, phone conversa:1cu with Region !!!, and during an is:arview cu Mar.h 3,1980, .he individual =ade several allega:1:ns.
1 o 4 o W!; . v 3_ l
t m
~
*he 1: die. dual s:sted : hat he had been espicyed by a p:1va:a de:se:1ve agency, a:d de Licensee. 00&E, :h: ug his ampi:yer, had a: gaged hi:
- voric unde ::ver a: de Zi=mer si:a := i=ves:13ste :1:e a:d padding b7 si:e personnai. Zis i:ves:1ga:1:n eff :: begas on ecemba; 10, 1979 and ended on .'anua.7 1 L980. *: addi:1en := i=f :ma:1:e
. regardiss works: :1:e :2:d paddisg, he cb aised i f =a~, cn regardi:3 E =ther ac:171:ias whid was ce basis f:: several allssa: Acts,'seme Of which rela:ad : = attars 2:de: .he ju:1sdi::1:n of .he 3EC.
*he 1: die. dual s:a:ad he had earlia: 5 :ugn: his isf ::a:1:e := ca T31. He 1: dica:ed he was 2 ca:.21: as :: vna; actics, if a y, veuli -!
he :a'a as by -24: agency.
~he ind1P. dual s.2:ed he had dec=esu:1:e sia:1:g := iis a*.lega:1::s 12 :he f::2 Of weekly repor.s he had prepa:ad and : aces Of several of his ecuversa:1:cs vid sita person =el. Ou.1:g :he is:arriew :n
.farch 3,1980, de *-ddvidual played ecse ;a:.s f .he : apes whid he sali concaised per 1:en:
- f =a:1== and ade ava11abia ::pias :f bl. rego .s.
- 3. Allese:1 es 34 sed on ce 1 f:=a:1:n b:aised 2 : usa the '::ar-taw W.2 the allager,
- s. :sview of the . aped ::cversa:10:s and its i=ves.d.ga:17e vyc .s. :::ee 411aga:1:ss i=volvi=g ac:171.1as 2nda 310 f :14di::1:n vere devel: ped.
3y Lae:e da:ed March 11, 1980, ce allager was ade. sed ca: as i vesti- - l ga:1:n of :hese al'.aga:1=us vculd be ::edue:ad. A ::yy :I -' ' i lastar r W.:t .he allager's idan:1?i:2:1:n dala:ad 's azuched := -21.s reper: . I as M'hi A. hese 411aga:10:s and inf: =a:1:n rega:11:g 2s= :b.21:ad I du:1:3 :na 1:ves:1ga.10: are sat f:::: helow. A11asa: ice 1- 2ef active velds 1. sada:7-:sia:ad systems have iee accep:ad, a=cus -dem vere velis 0506, 2161 and I311. The iden:1dia:1:n of de speci.fic welds *. -'d= allaga:10: was :b-
-=d ed f z a sview :f me . ape 2e a*. lager 'ud ade sur:sp:11:usly of his ::uversa:10:s vt. si:a perscesel. .t::::di:3 := -de ini:=a-
.1:n chemised by he allager, veld 2506 was bu=1ed is :::c:s:a be:veen de ladvasta 3" Ad ! a=4 the. 0 sta1= men: 3u11 ding. He said it was '..is unders-**dd ! -2a: . hey dug i: up :: :apai: * :, but he was uncer-** - vbe.her -' d a was 1 ce.
1 lagardiss veli Ilii, :he allager sali :ta: le had i f ::ed "O&I ::4:
. 1.s veli vas datac:17e. He sali he hac heard -da a:a cer :ss:.:s
. fi:2 had been '.1:ed as a :: sul a==. and elt it = had ::sfirmed
,. d e veld was daisc:17e. He alJo said i: vas his :=ders:2001:3 ::a:
. tis dalec: vas :sportad := ce NRO.
1 Iagartiss veli I311, ce allager sat: he vas ':f:=ed -Aa: :31.s veli had *an isse:: faul: a=4 -Ja II iac. ::dared -24: it be aces :ac. l '. e W e l l .
~ .y.
De allager stated : hat Peabcdy Tes:1:3 Se: rices (7eabody), also ref erred to as Maguallux, personnel had informed his . hat seme velds that ?eabody, :he sondes::uctive :esting contrac:ce, had rejec:ed as faul:7 vere subsequently accepted by III, de si:e construe:1on sanagement contractor. He said : hat a Feabody en-
.. playee had records identify 1sg de velds rej ec:ed by Peabo<jy which 5 were subsequen:17 accepted by C. He indicated :has by Isey of explanation, C04I had isformed him that :he incorpretation of de T; film obtained drough radiographic namdaations of welds is a judgment call. Be appearance of as 1:em on a radiographic film may be judged :o be a def act by one individual and soc by another and KI could overrule Peabody.
Fi: ding: On April 7,1980, de Peabody field supervisor was inte:rieved. He scated that he had so records shov1:3 .he velds Peabody had ini:1 ally rejected which were subsequently declared acceptable by C. He indicated : hat, al hough he was aware that this bad occurred, he did not k=cv how of ten and he could set provide any specific iss:ances. He also stated : hat de resul.s of radiographic av=mi a:1ons are recorded on sader sheets. Se radiographic film and de original reader sheets are turned over to KI*. He said Peabedy only had carbon copies of .he :aader sheets.
~
As a means of fur.her evaluating whether III was accepting velds identified as defective by Peabody, a saf ety-rela:ed sys:em. he High ?; essure Core Spray Sys:am, was selec:ed and all reader sheets per-=da* g :o i: vere reviewed. Of 99 velds is .he sys:em which were radiographed, :Vo instances were :cced is which ?tabody had checked de rejec: column and III had lined dat check ou: and had checked .he accept column. De radiographs of .hese :vo velds were reviewed by an NRC inspec:ce who is a certified NDE *.evel ***. He concurred da: :he velds vers ac:eptable. Conversely, i: vas noted : hat is several isstances, between five and :en, de original accept check sark entered by ?eabody had been lined c cuss and a rej ect check had been encared by KI*.. Regardiss the subjec of velds and radiographs of dem, an NRC inspection condue:ed on November S-9, and December 11-13, 1973 (Report No. f0-3f3/78-30) identified several discrepancies is radiographic :echniques and repor.s. Curist a subsequen: inspec:1on on September 18-20, and ":ecember ll-t*,1979 (Repor: No. 30-33a/7?-in several more discrepancies were identified. C0&E den hired NES :o
. rereview radiog:spbs and reports of all velds which had been accep:ed l , for :ur:over prior :o opera:1on. Bis review began is October 1979 I
and was :=mpleted is early April 1980. Se review included 2,390 radiographed velds. Of : hose, 958 had report discrepancies, f43 had scue :eesique problems and la velds vera f:und :s be,2= accept-able because of defects. .
.M 1,yp .
., ,e owe o me. - m wm=
- a.
- i i
a i Se II:' ?::jec: Jape:1=:a den: advised es 2'.a71, 1980, .-he 11 velds . were be1=g re-ermised a:d rasola:1:s regardi=3 . hem had =c: been c.spleted. He 2:a:ad -24: :na Of :ta it. welds feu=4 := be cac:ep:- able was ce sub'ac: d a cceender=asce report a:d, -deraf: e, had o: been accepted f:: :ur:over. "is veld, he said, should :c:
, have been '-*%ded is .he NIS review. Another veld had. bees :u:
y cut of de pipe f : exantisation s=d i: vas fe:er=ised .t;p:, a12 ugh it appeared : have a def ec s :he :adiographic fils, :: ves, is
- - fact, an acceptah,le veld.
lagardiss veld 'ro. I311, a review of ree::ds shewed ': vas velded ca Novemoer 9,1977, bu: because a Authorized Nucisar *.: spec _ : hold pot: vas sissed at es fi:up, :he veld was :u: :u: a=4 eplaced by veld No. I316. D e =1ssed 5:1d ;ois: vas docu=ec:ad by Neuc:=- for=ance Raport (III) :*.a. I-112811. 31.s 51 *. di:stes hat ce dispost:1:n was :: cu: :ut and :aplace ce veld. *: vas fe:e==1:ed ca: veld No. ISLS had :o: ye: receired fi:41 ac:sp ance. lagardi:s veld No.1242, rece:ds 1: dica ad -* ' = veld was firs: radisgraphed :n Augus 9, 1976, and f eu=d : have 2:acceptabla
;or:si:7 and slag 1: -de avaas :f 36-44. Se areas were repaired and a reradisgraph ;erf::=ed :n Augus: '.C, 1976 f:c=d i: :: be acceptabla. A raview was =ada Of de radios: apes for veld quali:7,
~
=achniques, and reper ac:uracy by as NIS
- eel ! rad 1:grapner :n
~
January 23, 1980 as par: Of d e abcve-cen:1:ced re-review isi:14:ad af tar ce '.973-79 NRC 1: spec:10:s. Se NIS *.avs1 O radi:grapher f:und sene discrepa:cias v:1:h have .c bee: :ssolved, 2:d ce we'.d has :o: been given fi:41 accepta:ca. lagardi:g veil No. ;!506, a reviaw :f rec: ds shewed -' ' = veit was firs: radi: graphed :n Jc17 !!,1976 a=4 fou=d .m have 1:::mpleta
~
fusion a=d peca::a:ica 1 de a:sas o f *-12 and 13-i,6. he areas vere repaired and ce veld re-radi: graphed :n .*use 3,1977 and
' f und :: be acespeable. A :eview vas ada :d -ae radi:gra:hs f::
veld quality, :ech=iques a=d repc.: accuracy by an NIS *avel O! rad 1:grapher en Oc::ber 11, 1979 as a. :ssui: Of de 510 i= spec.1:s condue:ad i: 1977. 3e *.avel ***. f:uad sc34 disc: spa:Cias Vai:h have =ce been resolvei a=d -le veli has to: received fi:al accep:- ance. Ailasarian :: 3e anner i: .t.ich sad a:7-reia:ad *:stallad pipi:g was fluanee was '.=adequa:a a:4 a scheduled sim m ek. f hsh vas reduced :: :wo weeks.
. S'e allager ;;:vided i=d::=a:1:a aa: a si:a emp1:yee i:d::=ed hi:
,. On Oecember '7, '.9*9, .ha: another i dividual vno '.ad bes= e==1:ved as a general f: eman a: ae si:a had Objactai :s te thsci:s ;;:-
eduras used. He had aise : f ec:ed veen a par-d -"' a- uss -22: should have .as.an six veeks was ::: :: :vo veeks. On :ss :c:ssi:
.ha i:dividual had demons:: :ad ce fhshi:g was i adeq ata by
;cm d' ! := a pipe .t' -* reirased. sedi:en: a:d slas iurf, s -le flash. 3e iden:1:7 :i -da f: _ e= ge arsi f :e=as was ;;;vited by
-d e allager.
egy _ ..e. %
, e . = ,
.e 1
$ Tinding: Cn April 7,1980, de for:er general foreman was contac:ed and incerviewed. 31s individual said he had worked at de ::imner s1:e from June 1973 until November '973. In 1973 he was de general foreman of :he flush group. ,
; Regarding :he six-veek versus :vo-week flush, the indivdual isdicated it had been anticipated six week.s vould be needed to prepare for and
., flu 4h one of de systems. He, however, ves able to accomplish a s sacisfactory flush in :vo weeks. He indicated dae .he shor:ar
- 1:na did not mean de flush was oc done according :o .he require-ments. Rather, i: ves a case of he and his =en beiss able :s ac:cm-plish a dob in less :1ae can espec:ed.
Bis individual stated . hat in his epinion de velding done on :he critical systems, such as de main steam lines and in :he reactor . building, was good. He said, hevever, dat several problems were encountered in .he flushing activ1:ies unile he was at de si:e but he was unable to provide information regarding any specift: require-sects . hat were not set. NRC inspec:Lons conducted subsequent to .he departure of .his indivi-dual from .he site iscluded an examina: ion of flushing ac:1P. ias and some specific problems were iden.ified. Cu de basis of one of dese inspec:1cus, conducted January 3-6 and 3,1979 (3eport No. 50-358/79-01), one 1:aa of concempliance and one devia:1on vere identified. D e sencompliance rela:ed :o a failure :o close a valve , during a flush and an inadequa:e procedure to assure boundar7 ' valves . ! are closed. De deviation was ha: de procedure did sot require taggtsg of boundary valves. A second inspection condue:es Tehruary 27-25, March 1-2, 19-2.3, and April ?-11,1979 (Repor No. f0-353/79-06) resul:ed in one 1:en of sencomplia:ce regarding flushing actiP.:iss. This related :o a failure :o saiscais control of flushing va:ers re-sul:1sg in .he flooding of equipmen: in a system which had been :urad over for preoperacional testisg. De individual indicated a catter of concern :o his was that a hydrocese of de reactor contai= ment was successfully performed, but af ter de :sst some instrumen *.ines were cut out which i= validated tha hydrocest. He i=dicated he was uncer.ain as :o whether 00&E vould attempt to use .his test as seecing test requirements or unecher .he NRO was svare .he :ese had been 1 validated by the subsequent modifi-cations. On April 3,1980, *.he NRC Resident Inspector advised : hat he as well as C0&E vere aware hat he initial hydrotest was so: valid because
' of :he subsequent :odifica:1,:n of de 1:s:rumenc '. ices. He s a:sd da:
another hydrotesc was :entatively scheduled :s be performed duri:3 he summer of 1980. In viets of de above, further i=ves: iga:icu a: the si:a in de area of. flushisg ac:1vi:1es was soc pursued. -
- 6 l
1
*e = Wg
, o - , ,
. ___.u...
s Alle:seien 3: Five defective velds were iden:1fied i: 7:alahrt:ated piptsg. bu: ce ;1;e was ac:epted a:d iss: ailed i= a saf a:7-rela:ad systas.
*hrough a revisu of reports vri::a: by da allager a d -le : apes :f
,- conversa:1:ns vid si:e person =e1 as well as i for=a:1:: .supphed 2
~
.hrough is:arview on P. arch 3,1980, .he fo11:v1=g i= form.:14: vas ob:aised regardiss .his allegatics.
t Ouring the :iRC heart:ss is :fovesse: ' 979, a ques:1:s was :sised concer:1:g an accidas: vuid i:velved :he d::ppi:3 Of fuel ::ds. A former si:e empicyee had ;::videc 1:f :=a:1cn :s a:::=eys vec vers :pposed := ce 2: ansi 3 Of ::e ;'as: . :1ch was :ta basis f:r raisiss -21s ques *:s. A r*.sc. . mica:10: be:veen .he f:=ar am-playee a:d de a:::::sys oc::::ad, hevever. S e ques 1:n abcut an acciden shcuid have redar:ed :: ;1;1:3 bei:3 d::pped fr:n a
- ac:sr ::allar rader han fuel bei:s d::pped.
De allager advised da: is accut Oct:ber '.97?, a ::silar 1:ad f pipes fabrica:sd 4: -de I4114g3 002:a:7, ';catad . i: ?t==sviva=14, arrived a: -de si:e is de :1ddle Of he igh:. SL:cs persec=e* and pr:per equi;mes: vera :c: avai'aola :o =icad i: ;;:cerly a ember f C:&7. sanagement issued iss:: c:1;cs s push .he ;1;e f::a ce ::uck. : :s de ;; und. Aten .he ;1 pes vers f:und :n the g::und the folievt:g day, i: vas dacided .ha: de ;1 pes vould have :: he i:spected by :- 27 :: de arsine whetter . hey had been issagsd. ?sabecy was i s::te:ad :s x-ray (radi: graph) -de pipes and ! := 3 faul:7 velds vers idas:ified. Si:ce ?easedy had been iss :ue:ac :: ::eck ::e ;1;es bu: =c : .h e ! velds, and since ce velds had bes: :astad a:d f:usd := is ac:sp:ahia before shipment by I411=gg, ce ;ipes vers appr:ved 57 C~ *cali:7 Assuranca. hose yt;es vera 1:s-*_ad i: :he fai 5:aac Iaiiad
- Sys
- am,. a saf a:7-rala:ad 37s:an.
Tindi::: A bill Of ladiss da:ad June ~9, '97? sucved :ta: ?""-=~
?cver ?::due:s, a divisi:n of Full.=an, .::. , 71111amsport, ? s::sviva=ia, formerly 'ceva as !!. 7. Iallogg 0 =ca=7, relaased :s he 04117 I::: ass Campany five piacas f 71;e asse=bl7 /5, veighing 5,*00 pounds, f::
delivery : .he C &I li. amer si:a :n it:nday, July 1,1979. A ;acki=g slip ac::=ca=7t=g de shipment 2stad ce f=11:vi:g piacas: 2fSC83311-43
*2fSC9BA11-LAI
. *215C33Al'.-f3H
, *2151'311-73H
.'.'.S C3al1- M
.L 3r receiv1=g s s=a suevs i vas scaived :n .'ci? 3, *.979. 03::.as f c e bill. :d Ladi:5 a=d de ;ack.:C slip vere Ob:21:e/ and are at: ached. . -2e rapA; as T.x=151 s 3 teri 0, raspec d. vel W 6 i
l I
.. i <.# Iach of dese pipes (spool pieces) were for de l'.ain Stesa Safe:7 Relief 7alve discharge and were carbon s: eel pipe assemblies ap-prox 1:aacely 15' 7 5/S" long, il 3/a" is diameter and having a vall thickness of .687". ; ,
i On hand at the *.i:mner site were QA documen:ation packagei for each 7 of these 5 spool pieces received from Fut %=n. A copy of one
.. package was obtained and is attached :o this report as Exhibi: J.
. I On July 5,1979, Nonconformance Repor: (NR) No. I-1911 was prepared indicating " Spools were rolled off of :nck onto ground and striki g other spools" and listing the above iden.1ficacion = umbers. ~he issuance of dis NK had the aff ac: of placing :hese pipe spools is a hold status in the III varehouse. On July 10, 1979, .he KI Construction Ing1 seer ancered .he follot-isg disposi:1oc on dis NR
" Rework. (1) Perform liquid penetrant :as: on all velds; (1) perform visual inspection of veld and preps. Accept on basis of inspection (1) and (2). Should any pipe spool fail due :o inspections (1) and (1) a separate Nonconformance vill be issued." A III QA engineer concurred in .his dispost:1on on the same date. A copy of NR I-1911 is attached to :his repor: as Exhibi: !.
NR I-1911 was voided and superseded by NR I-1911 Rev. 1 on :he same date, July 10, 1979. III ar.d C0&I personnel advised thac de dis-w position shown on NR I-1911 was reconsidered because : hey wished :o avoid remov1=g de paisc from :he velds whid would be ecessary before a liquid penetrant =~d-stion could be perfor=ed. NR I-1911 Rev. I danged de ft:sr 1:em of the disposition .o: "?erform RO' enMnacion of all velds." A copy of NR I-1911 Rev. 1 is ac: ached to this :eport as Exhibi: y. A QA.Surved'Tance Reporn dated July 23, 1979, addressed :s a C0&I QA eng1 seer signed by he KI! NDE QA eng1:eer, showed da: on bree spool pieces, veld X4 had rejec:able indications, and requested to be advised :encerning he dispost:1oning of dese : ejections. Ihe CG&E QA engineer stated .hac to .he bes: of his recollection, he did sothiss in response :s :t.1s request and could not :ecall having discussed the matter vt:h anyone. A copy of dis Surve111a=ce Report is at: ached to .his repor as Exhibie G. C0&E and KI personnel stated all five spoc! pieces were radiographed on an "informacion only" basis but :nly the films for dose dree Ref erred to La de Surved ance Report were re"d"ed. ~he I4 veld is a weld which joi=s a solid cap :o one end of .he spool piece. Radio-graphy is :oc de apprepriate technique employed :s anM e a veld
' of this ki=d since ce gamma rays mus pass .hrough de cap (abou 11' of sacal) as well as the veld. ~he KI! Cons::ue:1on I=gi:eer said .he radiographs were done vi d .he hough: -ha: . hey d.ght show surface damage, even . hough it was recogni:ed de quali:;7 of de film. would not be good and i: vas recognized hac :he fd,12 vould not seec any code s-Mards.
J.'a ,
- "-** = = = . . . .. , ,,
t .. . . - t
-t n I-19ti lav. i was roided and superseded by 2 I-1911 lev. 1 3 -
s July 31, '979. he disposi:1:n shev= := :he '4::e: vas :: perfors l~ --- d-=:1 s :f all "but:-welds" a=d :: perf :s P.sual men:1:ss ei ali " fille:-welds.* A QA Suriaf'amace Repor dated Augus: 3,1979 showed -laE sil fise i spool pieces vers P.sually examincd and vere feu:d accepfable. A opy of .his Surreillance leport is at: ached :: dis repo'2 : as
._., Izn151: 3.
31:ce :vo spool pieces had shcun :: i:di:a:1:n :f famage 2: ugh radi:g: ycia arm =*-=:1:n 4:d P.sual a----=:1:n aso: hor 31, No. I-199*, dated Augus: 9,1979, was ;;epared as a .achan143 :: rencvs dose
- vo spool pieces f::a a h:14 :: di:1:n bu: : retais an :per 2 :n de :: hor dree. R I-1911 14*r. 1 was tiesed by III QA :n Augus 9,1979, e.d de :ocation "Izeep:1::s :s ) See NK I-199 7." A
- py =f .he N1 I-1911 24v.1 is a:. ached as *'ht: !.
N1 I-1997 showed ha: .he spool pieces O'.5C93Al*-LAZ a:d Of.SC83A;1-53Z vere ac:speah'e. On Augus: 13,1979 he II* 0 nstracti:n I:siceer placed a tota:1:s :n NE I-1997 "004I :: 11sposi:1:n." " e II". Cons:::ction I:giseer sta:ed da: dis was app =pria:e si:ce &I has responsibili:7 for off-si:a ve=d:: supplied ' :e=s . On Augua: 19,1979 he C0&E Ocestrac:1 = I:tiseer added :he iispost:i:n "Accep:- As-I.s* and deserced de reascus f : -*' = dispest:icu. A ::py f l N1 I-1997 is attached :: **' = report as I.21bi: ?. s. Quali:7 Assurance *.:s: ue:1:n, 'ACC No. r-a, Neuc:sf::=1:g Ma: aria *. Cen:::1, requires da: NRs dispos 1:1::ed " Ac ost- As-!s' be sig=ec by de Material la'itew 3 card bef::e : hey :e :1: sed :u:. 2 I-1977 was :1: sed :u: :n Oc :ce: '.7, 1979 ...: a ::=ne:: added by -de 3r. 3e:: i '. undy (3&L) board :encer :: ::e elfac: ca: "**e lds :sf ec:ed by radi:g:sph are ::vered by NC1 I-10*0." A ::py :f de 21: sed N1 I-l!9' 1.s a:. ached :: .*.is
. reporn as Iz 151: I.
51 I-20*C showed .he s.ame ':f :=a:1:= as NR I-1997, but a: de .1=a of .he 1:ves:14a:1:n, I .0*C had o: ies :1: sed :u:. A : py :f N1 E-10*C is a:.acced : -*'e :eport as Exhibi: .. A review =f :scords a: .he vershcuse shewed ha: .he .hree spool pieces, shich vere .he subj ec: :f ce ::e= N1 had been relaased := const::c ':n for '.:s alia:1:n as f=1.'.:vs: , !:en ssue Oa:e l l C'S L1311-73R 9/13/7? I d-
*35'03A'.2-ICZ 8/lal~?
~25083311-43 7/03/ 79 o
w
- *1- ,
~
, * * ' - p m,,g,,
O O o O
-m
- On April 8, 1980, 1: was established dat :hese spool pieces had been installed and so " Hold" :ag or "0eficiency" :ag had been placed on : hor.. This is is nonecapliance 10 Cy1 f0, Appendix 3, Crt:erion I7, and III Quali:7 Assurance ? ocedure No.14 1
It was ascertained thac the spool pieces had been relassyd from de varehouse on the basis of a later version of R I-1911 :+=v. 2 on 3 which the above-sancioned notation referenciss R I-1997 had been Lised drough on September la,1979. A :opy of :his version of R I-1911 Rev. 2 is at: ached :o .his report as Izhibt: M. I: was deterstned . hat de QA Documen: Con =ol Supe:risor had lised out the sotation. He indicated ha: he had heard das R I-1997 was beiss voided so he f al: .here was :o ;oist is 1: betsg : oss-referenced any longer on NR I-1911 lav. 2. The supplier QA man is the warehouse indicated :o h1= cat some pressure was being f al: from construe:1on :o get de spool pieces released. Be Occ.: ment Control Supervisor info: sed .he varehouse : hat n I-1911 Rev. 2 had been closed out and i: vas al'. right to talease :he spool pieces. He said this was done on the assumption that what was considered to be a paper problem would be :leared up. The Documen: Con nel Supet risor as well as other si:e personnel isdica:ed de accept-ab111:7 of the spool pieces -ss regarded as a paper problem rather chau a real problem. I: vas indicated da: the probabill:y of actual damage to pipes of dar s1:e and vall :ht:ksess due :s sishandling upon delivery was extremely remote. l 3e supplier QA sas advised that .he spool pieces were released l from :he varehouse on .he basis of .he rersion of R I-1911 lev. 2 unich had he reference :s NR I-197* 11 sed c:: ugh (Exhibi: M) . He indicated dat de Occument Cone cl Super riser was instrue:ed to line .hrough .he notacion by a 00&E official. ~he la::er 1:div1-dual, however, denied any recollection of having giren dat ins:1ac-
- 1on. The impr:per close out of NR I-19tl lev. 2, which resul:ed is
- he release of spool pieces for installation before deir accept-ability had been establisned is is encomplianca vi.h 10 C7150, Appendix 3. C 1:arion 17, and III Quali:7 Assurance ? ocedure No.
- 16. .
On April 23,1980, Def t:1anc7 Tags vers placed on de spool pieces l and during the period Apr11 25-25, '.980, Peabody personnel perfor=ed sagneci particia and u1=ason1: 1: spec:1ons of 2e velds is tues:1on.
~he reports of hese inspec:1ons were reviewed a=d .he ?tabody in-spec: ors performing .hese mur* a:1ons were ista: rieved on May 1, 1980. ~he Peabody personnel sta:ed hat they had concluded :n de basis of .hase exa=1:a:1ons tha: -he spool pieces were acceptable.
I: vas also ascar:21 sed ca: on April 23, 1980, ?" = personnel risited the *.ismer si:e and tiso performed 21=asoni- inspections of de velds. On .he basis of dese examisa:1ons, Pu11 san provided a statemenc :s C0&E :hac case velds were acceptable. ?tabody
%, personnel advised . hat day had obsarved de extr.1:a:1cus perfor=ed by ?nt h and they_ agreeri vic de resul:s.
N s
- a. Addi:1:nal .Cleta*i ts Ouriss :alephone :en:ac : vi.h ce n c :n May 3 4:4 7,1980, ce alleger s:a:ad -hat he had evide:ce f cri:1:41 ac:1::s rela:1:g :s de spool pieces wht:1 vera the subf ect =f Allegati n Itc'. 3 above.
;. He sta:ed ca: he had evide:ca ca: be: vees ca so P.sC2 := ce X %==e si:e by de RC i=ves:1ga:1:ss team :s A;;11. 7-9 $=d April
~
. 20 w.ay 1-1, ce velds had bee: cu: :u: a d/:r repaired. his he 7 alleged, vaa the reascu 24: ce velds were judged :: be acceptacle durist .he sec d vtst:. He also s 2:ad he had eP.de ce -hat pressare was exertad upon ?sacody perso==e1 := .~.chc;1 ':f:::a:ims .
f :a .he RC 1: ::=r.ection vi h :he ':ves:1ga:1:c. . On May 3,1980, ce allager was is:arviewed j:is:17 by SRC a:d T3: perso=:el. Ou:1:g his istarrisw ce allager ;;:P.ded f: :se.sw a
- ape :sec di:3 Of .hree :alephone :: versatists he had had P..h
?sabody persensel. Af:ar Li.s:aning :s ce .hree ::= versa:1: s, he T3I representa:ive 1: dica:ed 24: cay did so: a: pear :: him :s be evidenca f :rd + -= :7 *ie : ape was fur.1shed :: == 20 f:
further review and fall:w p.
~ ~2 "he firs: :enversa:1:n, ace::di 3 := ce allager. ::cic place :: May T
5.1980 vic a supervisce is :he ?nahedy, 01 cd-= .1 ffica. A: ::e poi == duri:g .his :: versa:1:c :he superrisor said: "" hey :u: sc=e
- f .hese velds :ut.* "he allegsr :sspe:ded: "7:u =ean since ce H C had begn: : heir 1 vestiga:1:c?" *he superris:: ces said:
"Oh, yes, cey did :ha: ce sex: M: day." *atar 's :he ::: versa- .
- 1:n, .he supe:P sor said- "! is 'ccw . hey s:ar:ad :tpairi:g scue velds.'
On May 10, '.980, .he super riser who had =ade ce aucve sea:ase: s, was is:are.sw2d by :alephone. 34 s .2:ad -hat he had := firs:-na d
'cewledge af ac.d.71:1ee at the *.i=mer si:a a d ma: his ::mme::s ::
- he al. lager vera based upc= his ::: versa:12:s P.c as:ce: 7tahed7 l espicyee. "his secaud ': dip. dual rist:.s de *.i=cer si:a a:d =47 have ac:;uired de 1 f::mati:n hi self. Or :h::ug: ::: versa:1:ss vi:h ance.her ?nabcd7 '-d'P. dual va.o does vc:'c a: ce si:e. Ze i
l s ated he did :o: ' cow vuecer -he .* 4:: da an ha actived :::- car:1:s ce repairs Of velda re14:ad :: *:he crae spcol piecas ::
- s some Other pipes.
"he sec:=d ?sabed7 c=1:yse vas also is:a:P.sved by :alspecce ::
1 May 10. .'990. Ze acv.sec. .ha: ce velds car vere rapaired vers some vuich had been iden d.fied as bad du:1:3 :ta 3II tud1:. Ze l - sali :s his 'cewledge :c :spairs had been :ada := a=7 *.1" ;ipe s-velds. He added *ha: he had : viawed :ta resui:s :f me u.*.::ascei a - d-=:1:ss perd:: sed :: :ta *.1" pipes a:d he had :::ciadec =a welds are accap able.
- La -
. . _ , . . . * *N' ***
,S...'.._.- - _ _ . _ ._ _ -. _ . _ . .. -
~
) ne third Peabody individual, who is employed ac :he *.1:sser si:e,
- ves also interviewed by selephone :n u.ay 20. *his individual stated . hat de paint had been removed f;:s de velds on de 11" pipes so dat de :sses eculd be made of dem. Ha said his was l done with vire wheels and .here vers :o repairs or even 3:1sding done on de velds. -
f Le second : aped conversation cok place on .v a y 3,1980 te:veen de 3 allager and a radiographer employed by ?eabody. B is radiographer
- had been identified by :he alleger as being one of .he i=dividuals who had been involved in ;erforntiss :he radiograp' c y on he spool pieces is July 1979. During de eenversation de allager asked :he radiographer whether de pipes were bad. 3e radiographer respo=ded:
"I can' really say." 3 e alleger d en sca:ed he had been isformed the velds were cut cut and repaired. Le radiographer responded:
"I don't know." 3e alleger agaia raised :he question as to whether the velds were defec:1ve and de radiographer responded: "I dddn':
read the film. I was a :.sval : and :oc qualified to interprec .he fils." 3e radiographer . hen identified the ?sabody empicyee who had read :he film. The lat:ar individual had been interviewed on May 1,1980. He had stated dat all five spool pieces ha: had been dropped fr:m de ::vek had been examised and no indica: ices of defects had been found except .he cree which vere docune::ed by 2: NR. ne dird taped conversation :cok place on May 6,1980 be:veen de allager and de presiden: of ?tabody. Be pr'.=ary : spi of conver-sacion was :he sezion :aken by 00&E in es:17 April 1980 is ::a=s-ferri =g .he radiography verk f: m ?sabody :o anoder con:: actor, NES. De Presiden: stated dat he did :o: dispu:s .he acti:n :aken because 1: vould have a detrimental effec: On his fi:n's posi:ica l in .he industry, and adversely affect noir efforts :: obcai: l future con::ac.s. i on v.my 20,1980, .he ? esidene of Peabody was interviewed con-cer:1sg dis :caversation. He stated hat .he ac: ice taken by C0&E, and his posture :egardiss i:, had nothing o do v".d :he quali:7 of work at -he '.1=mer si:e. He said da: :o his k=ow-ledge, so ?eabody employees had been pressured :o accept or appr ve def ec:1ve velds. He stated da: Peabody's contract pr=vides for dei perform 1=g .he radiography and da: de acceptance er :e-jaccion of a veld rested vi h II:". ?tabody had to respecsibill:7 is dis regard and, .heref ore, as ai!.egati:n hat day were f or:ed :: pressured :o approve bad work vas :eac1=gless. All fils and rigi:21 records relati g :o mdiograpny ** atices vers :ur:ed ver :o IIy according :o .he :er=s of de cen::se:. He indicated da: i:
' was his unders:and1=g .he NRC required dat .hese :aterials be retained a: :he si:e and ava112cle for 1: spec:1:n.
J. v.anagement Jiscussten D On . var 1,1980, da resul:s of .he inves. iga:1ca were discussed d) vid C0&E and II* persot'=e1 identified by an asterisk (*) is de Persons Contactad see:1:n of .his report.
. ;3 .
- - s 0- . . - . . . - .
Ag*mehimma ca : Ishihi*.3 A *.hrougn .4 List of Izhibi s A - L.r d=4 3/11/30 n c :s A11ager = 3 - 3111 of '4 ding, i
= C - Facking Lisc .g T D - QA 3oc.mentacien Package -
?. I - R r-19 t1 r - R I-t911 1,v. t G - Surreillance Repor: 1:4 7/12/*9 I - Surreillance 14 port i:1 3/3/*?
I - R I-191L lav. I J - 2 I-L99 7 K - R I-1997 (closed) L - R I-2000 1 - R I-L?ti law. 1 (closed) e 0 e 0
. - ;s .
1 e . m= .. e = = = * = _- - - - _ - -_ . - , , ..---m.. . .-----
;= * * . . _ _ _ .- __._.... __ .
N MAR 1 ? S30 ! r-l Daar
*Jtis refers to the meeting between you, )fr. L. Um '*% of the 310 Baa& tuarters Offias, and as en )terth 3,1980.
On the baats of the informacias yes providad we plan to conduct as investigaties at. the Pa. E. 7.ismer Nacimar Power 71 ant rasardist the fallowing allaged amezarst
- 1. Defactive walds in safecy-ralated speams haw been accepted, among thes very walds CT 606, E1 Al and T. 811.
N 2. Five defective welds vers identified is pre-fabricated pipiar-but the pipe was accepted and inats11ad in a safacy-ralated systs.
- 3. The umanar la which safety-related installad piping vsa flashed was inadeciate and a scheduled 6-weak flash wa.s reduced ta ! wesha.
Tom will be informed of our findings fallsering conq:latias of our investigacias. 31maarmly, i C. A. Phillip Is,esti acima specialist r
~
/
6
. Ixhibi- A
? age ! 3:! l o m - -e e e- m = -me e.mo
.,__.__ . . __ = . . .
. m a .: .;.-3 . sr-
. . . . - .- s n . ,s - o
. a.mi.. - ..,s.nn -
i
' ' ' 3, M I P P i,'!O O R.I) i R .~ * * ' ""Car'.'.' *= a.'* J
- l ' *
- l '* ^' t ."'-'""i*
ri,ts.a co .y t *e A cene. Shipper's Ne= I
. A.W
- A::: ==m:s - . .
COmpan[#1,.. n u.wto.s,. a.. m,om.aun.a.an: ur,es in esect en m. w. .: n. .. .. e m.. ma .: .a.as.
, *c:.:.:espen , n :: o1
. i "
J
,,.,, PC'*:JOR PCWCt PRCOU-"5 . sevisiew -r mJt.Lu15 t'4C::#pcR ATt3 l
. _. _- -e- .. -
;s
>- ~ . . ~
.ec. . . , _
. . ._ - ~
,. . ~ .
. .~ ..
_.. .. . ~
- . n..
3.
*2
~ . .. - -~. . _. . m.
.2 - .
CONATT. GA3 AND ::I.CFJ.O COMPA'c M ""
" " * *=. " m - - = = =.a = a=.m.s.-
a "N* *GL. '
.I 7
* '* s
- A* 3CRG3. ANN l COL:D'AC3 AN: SCC":"27N C3CC T*" ""3:0 C tdJ ,. .. l 3,- Ccnsigncd to '"3E SA'l'~*d?CWUM ANU IIC2"' CP'PM ~ ~ ~ "~ ^ '~
*Jestina tic'.
M DU ~ State o[ N O Cec 5ty cf ' 2
,- , ouM a
;A:LT Z*??FZs3 (""3 3E *** ~7E7ED .uCN: T 7 2-79) - .
S J2 ; cc:imim cs:rier.6 de 4 d'V 'da i car Init!MW 'YA PExNNU.G
..;:,.u l disemich er amcus. seww. sms. u.a a.xrner.s l e.'L..%"..'. . l "'",,mg= l.. . .
3.. l eM pewcx m:::es :cs_ :sas t.. r i. l l l. .. iS 'l 5 l 7:==t 2:12 25s===.: us .; I a ,7ec !r>. I I
-j 3,1. ( 1/ co n m.. '
l . l t
/T "
ji \ N. - l . l l l i
.l l :. - p l l .l ... .-
I ".h , i . l . I I i - -
.: :, l' f. I -l . l l Mb-r- :: .-
".2t .-
., l. .I , - 1 I .. -s
;u l u.---
pr . j l Nj ls . 3 r ..
.s
.= l- .
. . e- l l .- -l.. N i~.- ~ ~ a- a
=
., l.. .. .. .-
. . . . . 1.:
3.- l . . .. .. .\ ,.l l .r.m....
- a. .,-
\
.s.: - .
.{ .
Q.. l j ..l I'PACCNG UST /.1C PUL' ','AN FCVER PROCUCTS. - l -l, 1 -
~
l . n! . i. - jQUALTTT CONT,4GL.. CTRTIFIC.ATF ATTp C l l ,gy {'g'g" Q.
~ ,.u w ,mm m r. m t..c ...
l /} l. ,r //r, l I e- i R .m g i b pen usine, weeucw . r=eu en s rn. Im ovu ! di.<*j. fl , l = = = * = ' " " = -
, p meucs sci r cauce en mexrn . lA<'l l t. n i zJ. . u . s. . , .
. .. : #> p ;y ,
~
7 u,v ly. ,.,.- l.,
) . ;
,,,......-..*u.iv.,..., -
t ...,.n.i-...-.,.~v...-,. i a. . . , -
/ .
l
. r
=
.;. .a
...m .
., ut,.,m ece s m, ,,. // ,~ > I, , y
...........,u..........,a a. w. suma e., j q ,..y.,p/ x / . Q.
.f.-. .
res; c-*- ; 3ex 3:08, w!'.:,Ir.s?cc, n 1 "* ': 1 7, .. (r .r.n . .%se..mee adaren <w shwr v - TxMh: 3 , aq, rl,,
.a ewst.'M.o .9 .* s .-N
. =
-c ,4 --
.,< s ,,,*
?"$*'L 35 L
_ _, . . . . - ~ - . - -
*p i ssw . a ss : -,..=.*, Q l' ..s. tt. ..=. .* 3.. at r'TC CU C*S .
\
, - 4
" "' c 5*
- e. ,,,,, ,3 m, . , o s := =,x., a 1 YlAaressest 8eresyswsN 17701 F C*:*CCO*AO: CAS %Q "*'*C:7*C COM?%IT l I
C :.02:3 A.*C 3 *:"2IZI CH:3 Z:.. .?. : CO:'?%iT '"* ' * * "
- I '" * '" 8 ' " '
,'D T2Z ..AT" : 7:".3 %m LICHT M%~T ' )
?.1,
) ATOis 13. I. A 10RC'.%'N ,
8"'"**'**'"L*"-
'58u**"-
200T/. PO*an STA: *. '* b h .s 52,'::A?.2c::20:W, CH 45153 'a l*"'"* r,. ... utt iss sa sa s =ee sa s ints se s=en te len.
. 6-25-79
- Pun :42 ?:ver ? oduc s WIC*!X4SPCC. PA 17701 tussess .I vie ja C3ess6ett as PPIPArs :any Ir;:sss lrs de Jet, c t* Ma 4y 74.f,)( 5 P*"e c/5,7:7I 3 emr.
~.
- s us. .ss. ..us. ,
rst L :J, == 4,,1: L., l . P I E CE .WM 5 Eit l'F'Nd.ll PtECE NUMBER l ' F ' NC . L. *' /,? l 2d7v' ll l h )' l/-x sc7?2 it. z.,,,,- l-r*: s ? D i: - /A H , l H?0 l f.o -) 1-Msa ? u i~. - !?>' 2fn \\ l
' '.*) l-4.*1//1/2. - 72M $ .?HE'b. l
/=M,(10 SA /L~ I.!M ? .?f'C ll l 2 .. , =d4/
__.m
... __ . . ( 7// ~
L --e:=r l k. & ha o.r A *" t i B N TA 1 ll .#F i Il I V.-,,.s - . . ~ a. . . ~ la i _( yasdd*JP4*4 < ~ ~ -~ ., g - -.
!! l
.I X. I L W 1 1 I h!, _" ~
---_e !
r 4 i i
' ll CLC I/ id -ll l q \ '
g l j ' '* 3 C. - nuan c.*R$ INC.{ j _ l
. - w ; , ,
__ l j 1 1. l . ,- .
,,,3...o -k I s , -+ ,g g l . * . '"/_g = f (i g3 i i fc.w . wuA= M-f j -
. . _ _ __.}J :
e .
- o. -
? j k l
. n . .~ -~
--_xnibt: 0 - ? age ; sf L
_ _ - (y . y
0 4 s
.,N
- e 1
.J .
hg o t>. x -.
.. e p b N b 2
- b* T*
, a e p A l
. e a z s q -
N k N
.E 3 m a m, a -
~,
. >. e , -
l U3 3 3 w a c 8 e l . a s = M *
.* 4 5
- 4 2 es , = = -*
R Y k Y #
* . % Q G, b .2
.E u Q !
s* Z '% '
;;3 * ,
b 8 W3 ( C
= 2 P
t
~ U c 'N '
.-= 10 'El = e
< = Ut 0 i
!= U C Z U2 4 2 .ac N .at g -9 u C
g w 4 e e 3 . i L M Z- Q O C \ ' Q Q l A .-
> t e ,
/, , '( )' }* $')A 1
2 m L C Q I l (.
*J ll*
.O 3 e m
M F % Q l M 3 U C .a
- j 4 U Q =
- f m o g e L m 5
~
j g 7 1 %l k 2 '2 2 N C3 03 .:
-g g M1 43 3 p g e a g -
'4 sl e- -
v y > 2 -,4 - s,
** Li U3 $ % % 01 $ % % $
" ,h k.l .
L; = i e 4 t ; 9 M l 3 e 4 A
'*4 T
u a 6 O 2 C u 2 O y O 3 '
\A m
t l5-C 0 0 3 .J c U U = = 2 .a u = (
%- C 3 --e u 3 > N* =
% ** ~
= C .2 O L C ( A o = a o u =
N -.= >. C * -s
.2
= = = ,M **:
"' .a a m .a 3 <
'. % M@ C =a Q 3
C 1 1 C .3 a Q 3 U U C C
- 2U c=
e 0 u - a e c e a ak m > E 2 gw
- L E E
- T =a 6 3 3 -
mu 1 s UM
-. = a a :s = u - u * :
I .'* C C X X L Q C s L. C .4 C= (E 2 M c c a 5-. [4
*: == .e -
O a-=c h - E t a
- c v
#i's, 3. "O I". 7 H 4 0 = s ' O e
- ur :: - u _-.- .I = 0 = = =
1
- 1 e e e o e e e e e o e e e o e 9 b O Y [ @ b @ h h M .N N Y d N 6 . == .=* e e l
l l w+ e N eee mo&
- m -_
3 .. . . - - . -
,r
.4 ,\. ,). '
D, ,L' -
% 3 0 4 -
N x.
'),
V. f
% sq l +3 o C 0 .
a '
\z 4. I S
. i t 2
=
. a x
i l %- St N> o a z s 2 NI i - S u a a a 1
.4.. c 1
4 t ( %N D Mi
- e a -
. > u 1 I a = N '). s I D .
5l!0 9 3 I l o u - 3 s 3 a 4 A r O Oi
- e Y,, ':c
- c. . D g, o l 3.
u a 1 . i l
~
5 I no I
>l Yh I !
f \& :n
*J l
**l .
- l xt >
Q >y i'l
<' =
d al vs 5 c
. ? O @ N1 4 H
e 5 z' ' 4
=' #l ,; & 14 U
1 9 d c. i $j$j o z, e
.- 4 :
mil , y
*y '
H" 3., t M , i - i ' 5l E ' OC* fhk
** I \
a u E-
=
i u : s t4 . l' *g a , 4 := i
.m m : .
l l % .- E
- ., 3l 2 t- ,:
Y, T 4 .! s -a-t= ' . 41 : 3 . > - 1 p ,
- 3 3 4 4 j I .
*4 l a C e t< ?
- .a ,1 metw i , .-
G w Nt .
- 3.o . mi *
.' g g .g g
't
. f9 -1;,l *i g 4 7' % a . '.T.
T i, m 3! t \Q T '.
- u 2 -
, he :-
% : L u s ::t a c \ .9 ,
wl (N 3 u ~ o = =
= a u
2 h, 3* Q Y
- g
=i =. = _- : :- :!.
q l 3 . s >. : -
= u =
. I
=
' ,q.' a 6 .. a 4 3 = 2 4 3 3 C st a s' a s s : : 3 u ;
0
- 2*J 0*
d a
'J u
3 2 3 S. O L s [4,l g w
=
==
> I 2 g =*.' ==* L S E C ** .4 b S1l 3 *J -
E := a "4 4 == 1. U -t "%. W *
.= 0 3 .* = m x a u
.O 3, a 3 :: 3 == :.L M u O. L = .
O a = st - . "O. E ' a '"l" 4 Nlt U b >= ":t O tr *-- L *
-- T = T S' O T
*1
. 4 =6 ~4 3 3 4 C = 4 = 3 %l a 3
.=. .N P @ @ . 3 3 = m N
- v .9 4
.= = == -.
.a
. ~
t i
'=
MA ....n,.. SERVICE CE.u .- [ d u i F_u . .h.. ,.O, .- .n~
~
c N '. *1 c.c.l. o g. _g g q i. . > g,e:i Mt%,,,.rp u , vA. 2264s.
.. u - ,4... ...a... . .
- C 3 ]
f -- C 101 g g pl80002 06/29/79 TLX PUI. POW WIP CINA 004 pt) WILLIANSPORT PA JUNE 29 1979 ., C E ,r. {
- CINCINg TI GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTENTION MR W W SCHwIERS - PRINCIPLE G A ENGINEER POS OrFICC SCX 962 {
CINCINNATI CHIQ 4520L C
~ {
- OCCUMENTATION PACXAGES AND RADIOGRAPH PACKAGES HAVE SEEN REVIEWED AND ARE COMPLE~E, TUR PH ASE I PIPING SUS AliSEMSLY (
JOB No,7935 CLASS 3 l ( F-SHEET REVISION NO [ 4AhKNo ............ .............. s......
- s l t 1M5088812-68 "" 3874 1 1MSO9BA12-1AH ' 3873 1 1MS0 8S A12-5BH - 3886 L :
1M5011312-73H ' 3888 1 3889 1 1M3108A12-1CH~ f J STATHAM NES QUALITY ASSUR.^NCE & STANDARCS .cECTCN 11:48 EST CATE:
.., _ _ MGMCCMP .4GM i
.RCUTE j 70: 1 INmAL:
l W..$ tWNC l CAS l
- Q ?GQ l I
' l RPE l lJWH l 1 CCX l )
l JW* l i V! .I - l4W d 1 4
'J1 l l a -
, q,c . .,. 2 j
. Lt.LbL- 3
? age 3 of 23
l . ~ i
.e l .
6
,I _ , , , . _ , , , - . , .. . --- . ---- -
... . sar .L Isaea a#. p .1/ 3 ..= 4 J.*? ( -e at g ,-
-N0 ,,, t :.s ,, . , ,,,,,,<, !A@a u , r %-~ -!.'r. . ! 7,.a, y y..1 ;;. .. -
s u ~ n' ss* 8
%,,,. M*400 SNf2 7* /P. A
- l. ..,,,,,j %,mnme fSf N""i atttt ::: #- tu is ! ras.:r':
? n :" "'" ~4*1? 1.* 11l.2 Mb esost '
~ / ! s'~ ' '- - * *M r r_D.*r'* i ***
'. m, a*.3. 1 'a.
. t -
- 1 z cual.f77 RSSURRNCE REC'O. LEY.~.LI. e. ~.-
?-*.'.M ? ~ '.&'
- 3. P R ~ H ~A T 3 C' t~ MIN I
4.' RFC/C' GRAPH Rd. Evi? W"_ S 'V $G:/f
'i'~' ff~'
. ssw TCasasvRE ic ar~ -- -
F/ ELD DVD5 E45 AT faUR r& Q . 1 H)l.CCRTMNS 45 DEGRE.55 ,pd* , g3 7
.} APA'A7 AND AECCRD. ,ns
- 4. rj.:.3..'yc = yn -e 7y ~w .
IBM ,V8 w l l-t PRC TECTE'O WITH .- 1 '
- CLCD- ALWNN/T.:~: , r Qe ,
e : i 7.'C.C. 7~0 34~ C! D?NED s. i
~ Q 'Q<. .
r.' AND ASINTED WITR' . . . I-ll R
-NC ,A
- CBR2C IINC ivc,_//.
.@.- Ji I f ,/ . , .
.l} /* l'AAC-~.
/f t,4 -J's".'s*?
ev3 ' _ NCS. .- y,, e,,s .
. g, 42r, s m gjy-- -
N. , i.w ::.t u - ,- Q _
- ~ ^ ~ ' 'gp - -y g,*)'j.4 e* *}s d g Ja
. * 'l '* .
,1 s . .
l * '
. . 4.% V:*. . -.
i . Q . . i ,s .S""lr"*/<* *== = n==== w e. ,, . i- r6 d,, d/it'/Ne .,,TN , - as - n ..s.,= , - ..
#47E a.../h7
, c. ,==.-.-u.,. i 8
. me e== s , se l 'l
. *="*=*r ==. a.ame 4a l
- l / 'J-e a i rwe m r - ~~~ . m e- r- /1. '
,,,t Lattist? !
i YI i' '"* # I "9f., ',';!! - .,,. "'II[T: .c e st: "~ ' ' ' ' '
-""J?O W. '*; s - ***""'- _ ' ' * " ' ' * *
( asti sa,t i it # erstastress *F' teret.s se .. -
} caas stsa.ecs. satraea4 / l ..... ist..s
<( . ,,un i a .: . u .e. m i inte. ' se m i I . ' * ' * * * * * .an e. .'-
l !. . I sI '12 ' -r M 1,vsL.S. A/A E
- is ! i - ?. 'in :g&lrge .-: , , , e- #'
-.= _:: ns::: -=,.: .._
~r, , .
m; . i '.- ,,,,.j, .'fR. 6Ed""'r . . , _6 ' ' '
, .. . *.7
; 6
.;".37 f/~"-d"-"' #. IIR:m: c' /"Q'" ~ 6 ' ' 6 i
I d'
;- .r.=r.s . _ arr- = ; -e.:ss- 7..ame~~e e . .mr. :-->
- .-.. . . i r
.t . ,k==r -.:-,:
,a -
s .a :g _, , ,,, :s., =J-~,.,s.:. . - . *y.u ? , / w-s- . n. . .% _--, =w-*
, 4
. -. - e. e- .:n- -~ . .
AuT.~
- Q!. .'if'"~,*:. '*~~** *st.T. A /NS
- W_ . : C ~.- '~ =- 6 .
- l
. cam s . 'i= u 2 ~s.-- ~n. . ,;..in , S - x . - . .t~"[ .- . ,
I
- f. 1 1 * /~** i} .?ip . r :~v /rse==* **s_=.,: o. .s ! u C_? is._M.ar t a n wme.,,-. .- ,r -
'~*
& r s t . tr ss**r *e -r -w..e e. i,v.
. i r. , _e e ,, m .
.s. . . . a
~
; i i a i i i l l i i i i .
r
. i i ' * ' ' '
b' l 4 8 1 4 j i i . ,
! a.. i. e e e .u.... : ,,ier .,, ..,e
. .saea . rerst eier se: ner;
?x.: m 0 - ?t2e . M 23 - - - -
e - -e.= . =a * **"-
....* .. _=- _
l
.. ~~
m i. W/.!s -n. c jp.. I< t' Ab7s n . r nc-- m , , - l
/ ASME TECT.LC~CASS ? ",ls~'.
,nu 'iCl.'ln'"fl?.'It'-h ;". " ' *" \
2C:/RUs7 A.2.fufnMCf 250V h*;.:- w - t w,, , e. t i. . . i ..: : tuin i r-W W
' t '
(w ) & 3. '9AD/062nPH r/ ELD @ 4 MAGNAP:Ir Au. wa.33 &" }z .; O g.g l 4 sg,. w.wxNic . - ,,w . . r.~r naos zw4 ..,
.. .,,p ~
T= ls,. 2 t 2a4 - m.- =t .- inn a .,E ,' 4*JM. Q3J g!4*l- M :
... g.. - Q.b ,8, -
, l
?
m. y,, ~ - ...yi .. :.., f. g.,
.> .. , Q @\ ! I,.- g A cll. _.
W.m.'*
. .,. .m ., .
, , r,.. ,-
.e.m m m m ua.- se wrsex.n.swa ,., cw!w .
.l . I
. wics as. -- n 1 u w ria n un.r w arz ,
- i. -
\g[g> on.~ aa
\ .
l . JN .ri/Z.4. A/A'. g3* j$ * (ITF 2 P:,ATC)
= v :~r7,,,z -
- v. -
,,. \ \ s
. ... .4... .
n,,, n, a s w
.. ... .na. n nic~
. . d..,:si' >- iMstae/,tr7-G.9./ \ /
t e ]m ir. c r/CM TH:/ /7*.! a .- .
==as i , ,.ms ., . . . 1-
. s c. .. . . i
. s. .3
- L
. 8 i 1
, i
) L. , i MT 3
i
'Q'5'(
._. a g
e
! , . I ' ..-
.s
... gen im ,e
, c .
. _ _ _ _ _ _ ... .. , i g s/
l i g. Q/ a n,.. -w,. . u. ~ - - . - ' ~
.- g ,,' y
- 1 P uniss m w H,T ".:." 5.% C,1 C = " -
2 :..e,%. _.e if r*s e. 3 9 f u. -
/,'- . a,5 S,*.s i
- ., # --anic~ -- -c.- swe,a x i
- 1nu. ftet tus:!!stsatt .- - . ;- : , -y . w ;am ir ,
- sts.l eart I at i ettstarfsts } 17 tit.asse 3-iv. .i. ..,,-
.e
;: fa y g,p rafttist j .u u u u ,..s
. t u
,, l J u u. . ,n I m .. l ....u. I .. ., ! , ., a i . . .. .. '
. j .
/ ' I I(2*Yce SMo e prpr p ? o _r.**
- EA W%$*r'$*' 'Mf- ** t C ; c_
i1 2 1 'to$rn Jut _ e pip? e r - /S* FA. '*>.n o h L Ft3 'ur. Mk-3 t I WE!Nr Dnn /Misxt,f5CM M%d DW \ &M,% i HT. I 2*- : n _ t i 1 /T. 2/ M * / t i L t i '
& a. s r sg-7.: ra ri u>. o 1 s- r-, e fari ~1. i f '- '
..\ fS I:l wl % 'ri,'G 'i':!nog?~ w?r w m-
"Q d.. . h ** .u w' pop) t t t t t
. l t t t i i i I t
, I t i i i i
' i 8 4 i i I t p i } l l l l i j i l i i i i l I 6 I t
; .. i e i i i t
. T. : i i , i i
-2 ,
..a i u u...,. i f uit sti nur
- 8 -
uses innt rust us nut 8 p- . .
-u ,
i Page 5 of 22 1
. I .
- r . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ __ _ _ .
/
rt Fun i*sc..:C "
. I t .ct*!! s.5. t.sittL: 1
- D'*
F13t m 'i"I'.1 0 iT \ n!. . C44,...le,) 3 ( A. Re .,,cd , t e.e l', . ... .. -
. age 5 of ;
gg *e= =' c , .; - p>ti,**
.--*-? :;.-*. **-
- -l"t. ta.es -
wo.
- i. r . . ., . . . . . . . . . . .
.. s h.
rs. e- t; -- r.- ts. .., e: ...s. - o . ... . Wm. 11. .1:=c; 4.1:1c;; Un:.: il , s-
- x. p . u
** ., i . , ,,
E M ae:? uescew . C'. i o g *
- b I M tp) c*rs te R A C=W R G*t.t 8' ..a V'* VC' u e Cg.
.a, t ... . - - ..... .
= w ,..pi u.. . -
u . -
~
- M JLJ p
t..n. n st.'q. .q W ~~y m.. - . x ,. c . . g ., . . g ? (to z 4 ti a >s a a u. u= . . . . . .. e s . :=. :2... J v y j.j8 m. 4.u . -- M/A uu -a. .. - "5-t . 3 5 o ? H .e .-- , e.
.u. .s.
.. u o ,,,,,3..,.,,,,,,,,,..,,,,...,e._,e..,,,,,,,.,,,
u : u o u
- .o a AJ'* .) C
- n.= ~ a . .o . ,,,,,.
. . - ., , . . ~ .
,, c .,s z is- . e 4. . . '
e- a= ou u 2 .:
.* O .a; 2 : yen -
3 3 e a, .. . ,, a vs . t. m e t
= .a =
- 12 h M' 4 $$ ~'>' ' Mif-:: r er. ->O 7:'C ? ~' /, =::'
~..=3 u
a: >=
- .s -w .
e = ~ - - . . . - - . . . . . . . . . - . .
-..g n : ,.- s~-
G e . .o <rea ./r e .3 o3: - w . . .. . ... a4 ff J~. 3 .:
- e ; ic it. f ~'-
I
'~ ' hl /%I: h. u .l* /Se Cr** l~ De M
~
en ri-t', _5 ?>)? fl i2 . s *" CsLe P
~ <r ' ~
CD t Ch _'"' s. 5.rC fd in % Cr'L G pr DC CD lC4 T Yf a str o C~ w CC~r
*s 'E fr !* J -? D yT T'W A* ,C**"C 3A S.L 'C of y. it l
Yts/C _2 11 / ;d Y ll Y'112 49
***sJ W P! CH S A 5*%* .-O k
/ 'I 9PDAOy... omy:~~ r
- IE- 1,5* st i
,..-.e..u.s>=....-.
_ .- - a sce- ow u .- sue .est.zw anu = cssunt c=ss : mc. /.% ' , ,
, __ ! h:-* /'.7 gnee e i.q r4 er e.re- :eea"e-- ,,, A' .f .. ,
- . , - . u ,* -
91 51 e- .. .E, c . _ Ce* eb er * * '98L e,.,i, .. . . . C-2ml-1CC U1' .-1101' :.T.-l'F. CON I. _ a - u u . ..a. . . i w . .. . ii a o.. t. .. . v.. .. . -. . !
- .;o W #
- s . C ,., ' i- -- f r. . '."
r.
,, i.
l 3 '. t i ,2*2. .
- i. ~ i... a - . - ....
. . . ~
---e m -
._ . . . .i .uc:.l j
- . ... . . .. i 3, . . : - - =. m w. .
- . .i a - - . f
-.a.r- ..w,- t,
. ~ . - . , - . , . . . . . . . ~
,. r
._*" 7 , , ,
" *!!an f=rd S*.e:s 3ci'er :nsp. ~ s. 'b.
f c~ l, l
*.4 ' '
?.A ~ .2:t - .u .s.L.:.:.:r.
. . l %.. ..
'M f ~ "_. _ /
, _- . 1
-r,........n- ,,,. ..... . , . .
......~s....n.....
- .- -a.-..........u...~.-
- - .. . . . . . . . . ._ . . x. . . . % . r. r . . . . c . . ,
e e .e e 4%.70.??? , _
* . .- . P v 1.t. w .. ..cc . p ..,;jf'
- W e VtLLlan*' :' 5 ... ,
VIl$ Rt!' r*023 :
. k, ,
/38 L
- 3CM(oubt - asan.fO enk JCS NO. N - ' 7 9 3 5 / ~-'"*M Met
.r u - / c c .- A PREPATED SY > f' M p
. ; saat osalta6 % . Irrt . toue s .
- 9 d . CUSTOMER APPit0VED - KELLoGG wCL3 PROCEDURES /CCDE
~
, (C$ dei.Z) P1-K1-Tf.-SMAW 2C (No te A) (Code 19Z) PI-CB-76-5AW-32-1C (Note A :
l (code SI) PI-XI-TI.-SMAW-29-5C (Note A) . (Code 70) P1-BR-74-SMAW-12-2C l (Code 60) P1-KI-T6-SAW-29-1C (Note A) .(Code 32) PI-3R-T!*-SMAW-12L5C - i (Code 126Z) PI-05-ATTACHMEN S-6C (Note A & 3) (Code 9I) P1-BR-76-SAW7 7-1C l l Nore A: Mechanical Tese includes Charpy V-Notch I'est a: (minus) -20
- 7.
l1' Noca 3: Open Sue: Procedure per:si:ted for no: ales, fillecs, and non-pressure a::achaie:- i welds only (unless otherwise noced on :he spool de:2L1 sheet). . CONS. INSERT l Fl(LER M(TAL y l ',' l t orto I P'C-mz.. $ ruaw. extta. n mar. ,ymn Y I cto r oc.i r. cooc sweet ,g war tvPC si:g " CAT 3"
! r " 83 1Lw tr.
y tr
- 87 LP' >*
.. no. rootn L:: no. g I
! Obi. h ;g 3
'uCO L 5&R AY T T f Y5 t,,. t C 1 eJ4
.?bo *u?.I. J m.
(,1- G := - W ' J1Sf d f]/ Siel [ 50G 12.'S' 7 7-:: p / f( .3t .22:.076 f(eg,~:, 3 ,, / l l/
.y ts 4 /n d J" Lc,1 pfy f.
*~
ho / g A w: 'o . 'u7 Gp+ lJWl D f 1
- Cs'1 7H& %: Ac 77 We$ ,,
h I& / l \ 1 P h Iw . t CERTITY 9 TAT TWi$ eC 340 aNO SeC rimaa. IsaatecapIC REP 3RTS MAvt &CDt 4CY1CC tv
~
, (. Pull!TRn K ellog* . . ggggry assy,cg ogpaamt, g acipg7 to SC AC"L8fAGLf. IN
/ Acronoaact vita wt :cvenMuss srterricA: Cns. .
Revitten 1: Deleted Code 22, 23, and 26 '
' O.C. mana.Tm
. Added Code 19: ' ^ /" ge -
ud a So ma :-
*Tr 7.2..ibi; 'r-? age 7 of 22 ,,cg1 y,
~
as re t '
/. a . .
- .q 3 - ?sre i se 22
/ ,, ,
FUilm CR PO*,*.H ' Odt.:OtS r s-, vetusuar
/ *
.s.
p _ n ,,- x f
%) i s -
Ytl3 4ti*: t '*7212 * ,e
. yg " " d Ws. , -
f f ** J,*go
~
Jcs 80. n - 792T/1726 18 L
- 44mC."MJk4
- asese, in ggggyggy --
max .ma. J 7, L
. s .: ' n ot-,.r q p /
p
/-~
4AS4 6 3 0A s me. - 17P L - 6 ove r . . PRCP/stC3 SY ^* U.
\ CUS*CMEA APP 46VE3 -
XELL3GG v!La PROCEOURES/00CC (Code a:) ?!-XI T4-SMA*4-09-2C (Nace A) (Code 190) ?! C3-T6-SM-32-10 Oto:t A
'~ (Cod e 54 ?!-XI-Tf.-5%'- 9-3C (Nota A) * . (Code 70) 71-3 7s-T'-SMA'.*-12-20 (Code +3Z) FI-C-TS-SX;-29-IO (Noce A) , (Code 3*) ?l- 3 2- T;- SEA *4 3 C (Coda !!GI) 71-cs- A: ACUEN I-6C Croca A & 3) (Cod *= 90) ?1-32 75 SA*J-7-10 T 's'
,Q -*
.Noet A: }'echanical' Tes: includes *Cha py 7-Noc:h '"es:' a" t(sinus) . -::
- 7.
l ( : ,- Note 3: Cpen 3ue: ?;ocedure pe:mt::ed for r.ozzles, 'i!!e:s, and .an-pressues 4::4c.5e: i welds only, (unless a:hervise naced :: :he spool de:2il shee-). <. 3
...s ts C:=s. mcar i neux cu- l ,
l ns, I ,.,.. , i.-- rig e **O* F :* uaz. r et,;gn ' N* N*'- j 1 CI'; 5 t. gl
,' T.
'85 *'I-5"** m & W. s:: t','g, a
< . '-l"8, .. { ujl= *T ufl $c*.'
U '
'?IAS'L> f/} -f[7.7}i4'!\
s ' 7.,-e 4-
,+ ~'. *
, .l l.y_ ,-
t* - B r., M1.c.7 g.1 #J i2"f s lpg .
.- *!'l !
J/r .?2td71Isrl
- l. ,
.,_ u.. .
- a. . . ,
.1
-~ g> * . - - 4;705 e '//4 -
7 V
'Q/' l..
[ / 7/, ., "
. t351
,. 74j y Q /8'J7.57 C . e 4-t *68***}
f 2La. k .
,e ? /
M W '- d l '," *'3. *OV efef f- 1 w '=. Y ,,,
- , . ltnef , ~PT**
///4, f .f'75 7 da' elf 41jlCof f) ll ??
, y ,/ .- -
s bl,e,
- %, t i
/ /7, - =
g e-r
.+
.:. c +
e2.m :: e +,y l< l/ i t.
. w -9 7r .2 . e p 3' ,. 4 4 /,j
&t v ::. ti
- : <a aw: n. f. ! s :
j.'u- '[$$ N2 >l i
.\
Q y,y fd/'$ p[4 'dII # c-= y/.I.
.s r v.a ig r y , .<,. ,, r:'a c . A e54 L lk' A : g
~ isa %. m n
'd /
-lNp ,L.Q ,,tu - '~%W 7ad ;g : :,W ?:- '
.)
I ;/ I Lijj) '
'at 3 .
* -**. . . E ,* *
-~
y i,J/
1v. .
<c ,,,,- y e w :. - ,l N s
i e
.i s -
'. .\ l CERTtr$ *WAT Del 3. 2C'3IIS asc *MC r? neat. tJOICCRee*IC W aavt SED * #ff t:43 FF
%'\ Pulla:s X c11cg;, .,, wr es,,,,,e:. 3c.,,nar, ,,e r,2,. 3 3c c:.:7m,
. $ A::=:sc*ae::: vin. 3.c :cw;enas :rt::rtentoe. .
\, s. .
M ..- Xavisten ::g, te te.:=d Code ::, 25,. and 's 3.;. ax '> <u - - /'*w
./ '
'-%G d 7. ode 190
- f, /~
4 . *ded 3 ifi.;s '*:* **2T ,
/~'("
{ , ,%, * ** '
. se - * ' * *, pagt i g
l . =J * * - - -- .
~
. ., / * .
. .,7
.g Pullman Fu. couacts pp we e... : '
,/.
-;,,'# 4.5. -
f!(3 MI:*r' .- r c 0 : 3 ~?
/ .
109 NC- N~
', . - //p,,s 3.-) ggg jj
ss u . sooxL - =ue. em ' QQBf x . ,, ? r os y. . .-
"" c/s c:.-
- NJ sast ma t t a s A4. - TYP t - i osni . . , . . ' ' PRgpAAg: gy 4-e. .
CUSTCMER AP**Cyre . o.xty w sc,ro egengc.$ ogtc.nadegeepts/cact
. ~
$~S'il
_ V. t . f=/ Ad"A f/.7 f.t~f$ / \
- ~~ ,; .'-- 1 .2.$ & / * / = d 0 - $ 7 ~7 /A O '" $ $
~
.p. 2. &-7-77
. . , m...
CONS. INSEJIT.'N F l u.ER METM. p.ec, v p t5 etts
- e p.on [ N erts *wocts, w t'.s t e ,
- g. , ,"7 g ; ' y ,
lOEMT. C00g SW80L "IAI MEAT 02 3 McAf 4 FtRatTc MO. MC MI.mset R MC S!'E LOT sec. 9 er, pa33
'. C3eTRCL l
. g pp .g, "Af//* I k . t 01 I.* d 7 's '2f o i Y
.* he!? K. i 91_ a 6 9 u J fa t "
,f'
.v. . -...a:, o
.:s/
Jy*2 ~ .u ., < %.
'.." j.-7
, . . , g h e m s. y r.
l l ll I,
<l tl L
i _, s . 7e s .* t %_ t m vC7i 't I i ct - 'M _
- M < , c / *s I
, , .2 8[ _ *f f , ,
l~y e.
/ y,
- 9e/S e "Mr e i r,d 9 7 an ie i s.
g ,. I .* .8 -: /d e 1"' % 5 l-
. *- , 4
- ~
.- , , , , 4 .l s , s 6 % e
*.- y I "*S e ( l h i c '_ . r u a i i
$(,y %6e * - w n~ c
?~ - ; nno s _ _s W .;- '
- o r .:. . ca .
~:1 .w, J.20t/.'.,=.
?)
... f.Z .
.<*~,
s o n , I e e i Ny I
.- p i :
t
. . 4
. .e . . . e i
*." . ~ . .. . . .
0 $ l T . l l 4
't i I l l
.- i e e i i . . )
i . . i_
. i e t
. . < l ;
6 e i e e i e t l g . e a ! i
. . i !
ay e i , D{
, t i.
I e i i . i CE NTi rv TWAT nets stC3en asec 'WC riseAL e A010G2APwt C #CPCRTS =avt g ggw sty t twt gy
,m *
." ., PULthm *0WIF **GM"T
- 2JAll** ASSUWAnC DCPaJt htMT. AAC FCIJs0 70 SC AC:Z.P*AAf.f. I Ps ACOutcas.C1
*f*j TITH Det GovtmpeleaE SPTO:FICAT1Cres, e ' ..i. =ccast, PL $ hm s
. ',- M.
's,,. .
. 3 Aft dr/M <
~
'h '" I.X3ihi; 3 - ?3ge ? Of 3 PACE 0' L
~ ., . . ~ . .
' ! h br . '
l ,/ l l P s-t 8 . a g
- -: j i N 1 7
v s-e* sf . : .
- . i g ' '
j i - W :' 3 g ; - i l l l w
. N C# -
q' m: . : .. 3J
! e.
32 U t 2 b $III.
%3 i
x- -- 20 2 . -- l u R- =
- 2 7l:. N' , o- ec 3
=-
, u g , =
- p,so, ' *
=
i-
- iV ua *i Q =
= ..
' I Ts .'.i h,, w s
.2 g; -
m
,e a= =
o l
. . e i N ' '
-; i -
3 iD i kj >- a
=u. - 2 : . .
-a
,d e o C
(? ? 2 2 2
> u j $ $
; #g . ! - *
' ~
- 2. .:;- : -
2 l-
. = i.
c 6 c !: n fCf. =o
- =
= 4;.-; .
is c w
** l:
2* 5 t 6 I:: 4.$ i , - 6 : W j Jt. ;t c :: w a }-: i. '
= . M ,i 3
o, i % ".t , N if *E
- 7 g.
a
-- l l' l t e, 5 y = se 1 I i ! I I l I .! I I I I I i s
Si
=
l'.
- =ss2:c.l l l l l l l l l l l l i l 1 e k,l E 5 'E T5. 04'av**'84l l \l l ! l l l l l l l l l I 3
~
=
k D e3nAo l 8
' l } l
- l l l l l l l l l l .
i: I *
.'*. 3:v44nt l l l l l l l l l l l l l l !
s = ,
~ '
- $ an=ascunl l l l l } l l l l l ! l l l
- s :,
c.,
.i > 3 x-
.isn l l l l ! I i l I I I l I ! !
,i w.l b,i_i n w so evi l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ! !
+
"Q,, ,
i:va: l l l l l, l l l l } f l l l l ! m s.... I I I I I I i i i l i 2% l t i i i d IJ I.
.:. yr: svis j j l ! !
' l l ! l ! ! I ! I i
. T : .
tag.,\v: .:
- b. l .:1ese l 4 i ! i I '
- D ! l i
; } i i .
! ? v .v ;.s::e l \l\ lN jNl i i l l l I l i l i i wI
] .y m:ial me as g ' '
l 1 l ! l l I l ! l !
;_ :::: W ' ' '
q: li, 9;'s e .2u e2.l ~; l l 1 l l l l l l ! q 1. -- C' 1 di;-El%: ?*( essann 4' M M y 1 b ! I (. ; ; 7 7 4424.m 1 .f f I I l'.
~ y e' 7a ;m t-a
- 3. :i -
~,
t I i i-
\J:; . ' ca i 3 . . , .-
h ; 3h,h e s;v:s siacci' t 6 a
. : .: a : - :
*:g. 3A.
m- q ' l l 2 -. .=. l
!':= l l l l' 1 .
l. I _ . _ _ - . , .- - w
e * ,o = .
% i . g I
' ' i
' lJ 7 j '/c , . .
( * ' " e D l :
- 2 I n7 '
r9 ' M N I
- a :
1
; l l (R
e '. ~~
' u 'l' b
I $
= x 2
.s .
5
% l t l7 I i
i a
=- 34 : % 1 w I ,"
w3 m u 4 u
\% =*
=
y . i M. $ "$ 3; =0 $*
=o S c. \
t y :w it: a 8- 8- X
, a N ue
= .= . 1,,, .a .
.= . - @
22 4
~
C . ;O ~ o - . l 4 h M
; : v
- =
- - > 91 ge s,ys , a 2a 1 1 : %:' w c A X 4 4
.% o 4
d J W _ L
. W a c >c . .
C C C s 2 % K
.a a a .
>- y - - ,
.a -
(s a
=
- h w : : s 3
==
- w -
- OQ c c *- m - . -
* . et
,4 o w
- w a.
- s> -
I * ~ c.,
-t O wI ;
a. 7 .
;g j ,..$
[ U 3
-. oh ,, -
c . .I 3 . 3 l l l. l l l l l l l s L' , .d 1 l l l l l 1 l i 1Cc - E : :/= l \l \i i l i \l a; E 2 :
$"' 55" ** l i I I I I I I I N \l i I I f I 3 *
- c. ~{ . - r l I l l l
'2"" l
- E
. i.
l I I I I I l l I I i i I ll K. ; E
-o i
=
2:"aar 2a:naa l I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I l1 I I I I I I I I I
*'l l
'*'5A' l l 1 I I I I I I l Oh E I I I l l 1 I i I ! !
!1 E4 !%5 w e o' l l I I I l l l 1 1 i%o.. .
=== I 1 I I l. l l I I I I I l I i l i.W i w5a=o INI I I I I \1 I I I I I I l I i q
L
' i ; ~, != "'S l l \1 1 I I I
I I I I I I o N : Qlw: w
':2r2= I I I I I I I I I i ;
; yf ,
*h.w *j:
1 I I I I
'Y d " " 2 2:'
l \l \l N N \l\ l \l NI \l\l\ l \l , i i i i - l I f j ga qi _ s oi t .. l 4-i i i , 1 l
; p 3g i ,, j . .2u .unle
> > > > > > > > i i ! l l !
3 3g E ~9 e s m :- % o ~
- R. $ -
@5 E & u . .n ,.
=,
nc gq w . m. , i i , N, N s
- o 5
N8
- ,,3 3 #
N 4 & C & C %
~ s
-s y' hM 9
- h. d' e s % . . "; Q
- z:
i r=)
.]. h ~
.. O .
- O E * -* Q q Iqp 8431TOlA31M30t
{ { K g
, g
$ 75
3" d
Ib].I
* * *
- 7, :
~ ' * 'l
* .f l l l l fl l 1
*
- _.a '
.4 s~ qq Pullman Power Products
; p w. - r#m. 3 .
- Page *. of 22
-' ~
wicu te r =Anrictr esser: r:s accone . aos so. 7075' 347: 4/.: 4/79 - p g t:t No ,/-/7tS-c9'A8 /2 -4 6
*y e na, ;'27 7d h '
Gb MATEN!AL -- . l - 1 1 ?? 00-? A$d A ~
. .EXAMINATICN PRCCl3URL C;tPTANCE CRiitRIA 53 % F lEdd '
COUIPMEN WANUFACTURga N ,#4 A'A X/u v { EcclPMENT WOOCL. NO. '
*28 l PAATIO'.E CCLCA 4#V
~
a AMPCNAGE b8 i . 7900. SP ACING 0 i 2 1 MCCCR3 Cf iXAMt% Art:N Mi$ULTS . p Y, f ; Wh/ '
/ 5 '
GTh & !/r;a,c./' M OJ A.4" f* / 4 -: -.
. ~
* .;. 9/t
! . \
t i
- a 4 A'w C 2 7 1457t:T32 -
AY' _ AA 14 . * . t A .D C '. - ##
=reene e r t. inm s i-. :s l .
I s 44MC 1F t isPT C*'1 R
** S m ?- ?! . t A .1v t'.
1 I l' N-1- l _: .. --.s....__ -- ..
,. . _ .o - _
i e e i - j Pullman Power Products
; q;7 2 -- , w . .
/
;* ut T R A'S O N I C FLAW OE?!C* ION 4iCORO JOB MO- gArg.b 6e/i ri cer uo'. /Ms o8 8S12 -6,6-/
.r.yof 39o6 _
juArta:At 95 4 .. N
- s. 4
~ '
cx4ainArten raccrousc so. N-37' Acerer4=ct enittnia /X 37 .. scurrutur wooct so. OTUNc:2- 68 / /-// rnAnsoucta 2 25 Mb E- TIEdic 7fr- bd2rM CDuPLANT 'I M d [/--- b OI /Y* CALIBRAr10N. DATA
~
.$?s$chIan"r?cuscue MddftY Td7fdClt t - IC2Y ciicW/df *
,,co.o e, ex..., 7,e, ,,sute, g.i ..
w o D y c te , a r. .;. - G n . da fs,aa daa Gugrl of. Odd .
.; h
. MAue SF tmSPEC?ae -
SMT.TC.IA tZytL 4g escono or er.cxiurwarron feeA;&s. trsake Q Soc.X Gcuf a3 . SE- :aEdiN]- Ee - U.7~
~
.~ wg clz yqEccMk * - ~
) vst.d r; e r -Accef .
g y. f_gy ec . i
. e or ,,Sese,aa Ym/] 2 bslb
' ' " ' 5 * ' A ' ' " '- *
& , patosnY, etc. eai?2r wtU
~
a.en:o - ns. u e n
.A . __
I 4 i I ** 7 Pullman Fewer Freducts
. 1e 9 6 n -e ... m i 5 ~
lJ -- t.eu,2 .t,E-. - ,,,. e ,0, 1:0 2 Jos no- W7I~ oArE '!M PsEct no. lW ~ C? 05 'l2 'GS* / 'F'no . I?0 0 IMATER AL . 6 il y hXAMINATION FRCCE3URE b #0 Y UI ~ l-ll ACCEPTANCE ORIrERfA N EDY #1 l' () l o SR AMD N AME ANC 7Y*E 3F: 8 ATOM No.0F: 9tntinsni Ett ~C DV 0ESCh #L' etstinant 7'214A S C $$ cLtAnts ACC D& M ** cutanta stytt.sete E " ? Dw C F8'N AJ AC styttsets I /Y ! 1e i
> cwtur eat amatvs s :tatt ricArt s or itst :emnantats a v .44tt.
RECORO 3r !%AurNA?'ON 415UL*f
~'
QAo S E M USC lb5 ,kea C 34,Le.,7 y_c . w /t'7/ 7Y$ ale [* k CC,,$ he ) - M s> l I l s, e i 4AMC SF (MsPtC73
$ni.? 1A .tvt' U= .
. 4tc040 Or 41.! Taut 9A?t0N i
'N
~
J s t esnt av e uset se s . s nr.?:. A . ty t'.
* ' ' '. : 0 - ? age '.. :3 ;2 m
.-.w .-,w ,,,.
-w- - - - - - ,. n- -r
. . .. A
,1 .
"1 q'T Pullman Power Products, 7
. p
. m, ;:
'., )*' t.lQUIC MENETRANT IN13ECTt0N RECOCO JOS NQ W3 DATE b W ri ECt No. /-MS o t u nia - 4,8- / = F " N og 39el, fMATER!Al. C [8 7 A
~
}XAMINATION PROCEDURE W OO h il. $
ACCEPTANCE CR!TERIA 6S VO3 % a V. [ 4
< SRAND NAME AND TYPE OF: SATCH NC.0F:
PCNtTR AN7 v ,C[1d k .3[ 2 pg,,g;nany [/=E.d7 0 CLLAntR 00 N Y 3 CLEAntR OS
. OCVtLOPre V 8Y MN SLVELOPER I CMCutCAL ANALYSl5 CERTIFICATION OF TEST COMPCNEMTS AVAILASLC.
RECORO OF EXAMINA710N RESULIS (b1Ck*.Tido)
- Weld ,
>'s e a v .ty - 14.cc apt .
l
~
I
- i wAut or twSPECTom #h >*W-SNT.f C.t A ' Ev
. CL '
RECORD OF #f.EXAutNA?t0N N
~.
=Aut or r usrtCrom SNT.fC.lA t.IVEL Ed.ibi: 3 - ?sge 13 A 23
i , 4 I 7). 7;1 Pullman --- Pcwer Products N* utruisesic e.an :t r- r ~ =rco :
^
1 JCS NO DAfr 0 W vsEct no. /MMEAfz- M-f ., ,a_. 396G
$MATIAIAL N -
+~
, hC%AMINAT!QM PRCCE" JUNE No /Y'37 AC017?ANCE CM!TIRIA [5 ~37 C;u t PutNT MCC CL MQ'. N$ NY ' l Y ~~$
russaugt, ur mf a.- re,ca - /w. cour An- SM CE L CAL:anArtex. sara 02,~4Z d /ch - 72TC M M-
$ $rt $ $~rNutcut MAUUAY SBACS -ich$ CC:/s2ME' or o.o er tu o,s, ,2, ,tsut s
$. r.
weLs 9 - eunes wect.rsp4h1d Ls EicM sa n s
,.s si te-yeGed. - Le- u.r eur,2c w &'.
~; s
\ 2.~
g 1-. <i[,.P t. l . . l p l ., l
~
g ais t 3F fMS7tCT32 '
~
^-
f S M ?. ? . i A *. ty t'. WrOORO Of Wr.CTAw!MA*'OM b
,4 4 Aas t 3F tgs7CO?3e S N T
- C . ! A . E V t '. _
h'*** . 1 ~ IS$t *6 3!
,. . .
- _ . . -- ~
I es 7 yj :Pulln.:n .~r.~~mPower Products
.j ULrRA!CNt0 T '. A w OE?!O?!ON RECORO J0E No. $ gsig h ff rseet na.
/MSO688 41 l ,.,0. SM
;WATEnlAL E l- ~
/X - 37 cxAuiuArion enacteunt so-f X J7
. ACCErTANCE CRtTEniA l teunruenr uooes. no. OWDM - ldG A-ll inAnsoucta W~ 1 H Mbb* YWX Y l
courLANT O' I , cAtianAriou oArA DR;U d I ob e- PJ 45A-CCsCRtPr10N of M M U 0 S e W ;' L - / c u bd coVa%~E-rusetctionrtcssout . RECORO OF EXAMINAr: 0N R E S U t,
- firsnest. Assi 1 .
\ \ l
&N & -COM/ W* l c.
t . k .
. ,i cQ: l. .- .
j^. ,
=4mc or i seteren 7 A snr-re.i A .tytt RtcoRo or it.CYAMINA?!ON 1
i .
' f. . -
;/
maat or :=setetor sm;.re. : A t.tyt:. t
- Exn:0:1 ? age 17 of 23
a . .e l 1
-t n
*l Pullm..:t Power Produc'.s y x ... . . , ..,
7
*' ut.rna s cN i c r. A
- ct t:rteu access ]
- / ~
JOR NO. bd 3A;t I4N P1CCC No. hN0? <Yl$ ~ l3 $'*l *r* ny SON CE i uArta'l Ai. YSTf-. -> F-sa7f r ex4uiwA7 cN PRCCz3uRs NC. /I*N _ AC:1?? ANCE OM i TtR 1 A /X*3I e:u s .=u en 7 ua o E:. n a . I/$)t'-1I &JO77f 2AMc::?. RAnscuCza $ASAb5 WEAd W bfd* Csu Pt. A N 7 NO O L y cal.1SRATICM 3ATA YM
- h 3tsCRt?Tton or insatemien 7t:.m :ut M dJud shl - /ccId c . ,f,- s k s -
1 accone or ex4wi~irieu =tsut s I
] AWud s-ek w a mw so u _7., p, -
I w=-f.d @ ic .+%j :cra g a m .+ 7 w d . .
. i f Y ' ~ - =aut or := sate?se ) R'J'L' ^-Q A /PM i
j sur.?:.iA .tvt. I j ntcons or = r- t rim wiri :~
,l 4
=ame or t uset: se s ut . ? . t A '. t v t-.
I t Ir.O * : - ?s;a*.3 :f :: l _____._-~_
,~ - - - . _ . .
q; y pullmar.
, . . .Power
. - , . . products 7
j l- utTRAsoNIC ELA# O(*ICTION RECORO aos no. 795 [ oArt 6!H!7 esect no. /-MSOTAA C- &&l r n o ,- 3?CS YL E.uArtnsAn. */$rl . :> f'3 M 9
~
-ItxAwinArionemoctountso. /Y' 77
~
AcetrrANet enirtRiA /J-f7 scutrutur uootu no. IIS/A-ll - $AAW, DAM A
.. TRANSoUCEn AYe bb
- b X Z ~SObE ?*
couPLANT dd O/ - CALISRATIoN cATA blY 0 ~ Id'37" Y E couews ,a P:9e si& r INN $$Io?"r(cnsout kMfY TeW]- /@ b RECORD OF EXAutNATION RESULTS UJGd & ,45 9 IW S69eCE -hok ?9Es(cle-C"Ylbo 4 % k 2 c CEP7 '
-3
- maut CF INSPECTOR -
SM T. f C. ! A '.IV C' RECORD OF Rt.!%AutMA? ton 1 e U . WAMC OF tNSPECTCR SNT.TC.lA LZvtb Exhf=1: 3 - ?sge 19 of 23
l .
, , , : l
;.a l. . .: : ....a... : !.? i t
, 6 5 . . ....
- l,4i . 17
'r):.f: 3 I .
* '\ , ; , .
. I I i e l
j (fi'i i
,. i, . ! - . . ' . i, ., ll..,!.;f :
.! .; , ;..i
. : i i
! I <j .:n g!- ,
w .
}- i
..l, ' I l;., l, l, ,l ;s l
.:2l -
i..o . . .e j ' l, Ii.. {a
.l- . .-. . .i
.j . . . ...
u 2 ji j .,l . l ., t (. .l j i i i; l p 3 i ! e 4
; 4 >
- l. - .. J 4
- t. ,:
3a .. .
- l. .
, ,f .f ,, .
e ~? f , n .. .t
, .e. 4 ...
e . .-,.
..l,...
, ,a
- g. f. j '. 9. ' > <
. . .I....' . 5.1.*
.j T
.. . g . s. .- .
s s .
.; l:j lC J .{ , . . ;, a ,. .. !
-. - .- - 1 P
; ,l :!' ; J ;. : f;, . . - - - - - -
- 7. i.l .
i * *
.i.j .),
' i ' i .
e., .
'rl i , -
j ads . r .? . . ,
, .' j . l. ' ;3 i8 $1 .ll >. .! . .
11 . ,.
.. i.
.p ;., ..r.----. . . . .,. ....
, ..l.,e .;e , .. .,. '
,.)
8 e.
,d.:: .2.l, :. , . 2*.,
' f. ; l l
fl. t.
. .' . i .
,t=l. .I .
y
*- '; i l
... .l. i,.
e :
- t. .t m. . ; -
4 i. ~. . . .. ,. .;'1- ...
, f. .j' i;; 1 ..l . f. ..
.I'-
i.;
. , e i ,,.. ..- .< ,. '. .)
s .e" 9 1.. . .t i. . ...I .u'
...:...t,5........,4 ) 6t .
6
.v e
i 1:1' ..;e ti!.l! e, . 3.y , e [, t. ., t, t, c j.i .;.,. .
..). .
., 5 t
l; !.
- , *t,.a
., 4 i ,.
. i.
.K ' .) ;. :;; J
,L ., + l.,.../g, e g e
,1 < 5, ,.
;g .. .. ;g.- .
i 'I.,
,i
*l
.[:4 r: .' f.
i
,4 .i :
$ * .,." 6 .
}s I 2 { .' .s. - .; ;.21' T .:t c
- 1- M .
, l . .t.. . l, ' ;h . . . ... I ' . r !. .... ., .s,..
- t'., 4..
i.'
- e e g
, * , 3: s.- s.
. i. l..t ?.., . s. ) -
1 14 l.
.1. A .
i . ) :. 'j ,'
. i
. ,e' t 3.. .
' '.t.nfm,.i'.L.l.]~l.g.,,lj'.
. ,.'.1
- .3.;
'u .
j i
- se }
. ' * , e . I, ; f ,
..". 1:
s.
.'[I I o.!.d',.l;: .q.'_.c
- p
. ; .a . i
.....;2 4 ,,.4 ; : :: .
!* I'~I'I;'*
I,I i.L-j , a f. : . . f. ;I.. ..i-=...[..... , ,
. t. ; l t.i' I [-. a.t.a. .. i,. ..i .. t, ..
'j
. . ..,. r - ,,
.t p
.}l ~ l ..v:. .- . a.
- a. - .i......p.
..; ,. ., .a,,. y,. , .ni. . .
2 ;; ;
;. ' ~LI.s '
@ 'v i - -41 [: ,, t ..
5 , l * ! J !k e,) ; ,. .
* '.I 'e
[ t- l.4 g ,.,,. I . a 43 - . b 4_ . .* * *
.l. ; . '.
w{ ;i . d, .g g) * }
'4'
$.Lf. .lt
.,,,lj 4 ,,
g *. . -
;j;I
,.;,',.. ..;.t.......i.!
6 . ., l3 .I .s 4 t. 5
.4 ..[-..; .
5 ' i
- e.i - g .' ; .
.i .
6*T.t'.
, .;6 geq q
J F. : .4 a' . t . i . l . , .. f, ; ,
. l "' *. *{t.t.,
'..t.'
] -
4 p' i'. { ' .'
., e lli ll ..:
.l I j .
; i f .' : l
.!- .l:st-l1.s]...tl .1 vt : h al;,:l',.- .-
v .
.6 --.D.r ;.'f !
1 9 F
) .'
L.1.':c..l i .f.
- (- ;; 3 - [- .J. .;}'.,l i )
.: O
,.. l; . ; , ].
a
<* .( ! l f : }l J . : .,: 1
-*.i i
. ....::I. . . .I:
i *,,.[{.!.,,; c' s . .. . ei.g..
.r: -
I
.............6. ,
r .: .t... ... ;.i ..l'4
.- 4
. it. -
s.' 1
.s..g. i
.'t e :t .! .'g.j.
.. 5 ' .s
. e L. t . i e
fCI' ;
.f Q 1 O .?*-I .
*~ i*'
- 1 '"~a "w3,., lw.t a1 t-- -
. -- -. I .-
j -
,(.t't-I :.
>l'
.i:.. ..'.2
. I.t(.j 1";i u. .,l' 1,..;::,;r. . W %. .h L ar..a ; ls .
l i ..4 , l.j ; , l. 1r ---..i.. .. '.'+) . . . . . . . . . e {Mrt $- M .'!d,d'E......i.,..W.: 1tasu m .;s w '. :; !, i
* + $f
- u. . . . ve . . n - r e vru t.m. ,es !
. ps . afs. Sea, s
W' '4.* . t t l :. *#: 8 r.8 ! i- -i J :l
.n.,. ml ,
( .;. . l- 't.! -:l {e.! b ,, I gd, g.-r. .
- h. )dur5.t ".s . erew *. ^y.\ . -.=
1
. y
.I .i...m.
~ln.d;; l.g;,,;1,;;n[r;.; {'. . .i.....psener ' ; pl:..t '.v
- n:
,. pl ; -.4.
.... ;.a.I. : Wt.v.
- ii Q $. ..3y .355 .$e 4 .h ..
n
* . me e.s . @ .
_____'_e_ _ . _ _ _
o m' .-
,s o- s gt-sw
-= ,
P p 3q.g= .4 > j- p. J >= ' < < <
. -nn. ,
r* ',. . a
- E n<
> a
^ "2 gg < ;g:
a
> A e . < <
3 ,- u =T U E < "= E "5
. M *i @
w~ n E
% 5 a -
u- 8 M m;
' T' ? Y a w .
w
. O. < <
a.
= =
r , o e a w a o < a w d a s i I l % m , , ,
~. \
- 4.,
? q -
q c. 3 e.:, es c a -l-- ba V1 7 x.< a a w' D, * >8
.c Jg ;
y d d 74 . . <= M l'd 3 >= :* * * ' *
.P na w 3 >= < . < <
O- 4.1. min y .g=, p.,
=
- 3 .g*
kg ,, . ene 3;, el O* -e w r. n. C d n J g N a w
- n. - C
'v .' ~J ,
o. o g , < < W T ".J , ~o ==.
"I
.Z *C d < . u a $. .c . u .
s vi
.I k - d l 4
. . .p. -
~
Na e= P a , . .a .a e 4. c e,. - n .s .
<** 9 .b
- l;l 7 v
3.. ;. 9 "", ~, ~,' - 3% < < < < o' , N ll l:
===. ,g 8
,0 %
=9 % '
a - a O m ~y' w C i
.J aw N e Q N .3 d
>=
.*^
l
<=
3 p'==
' E O
led M yaCp..=, < < < 4 - Q m m. f.,3 aC tad
>=*
d
- l
= 4 =w <! t y ans' - 5 e ,2,, , gg g, P
-e8' , T- w
=
., e p 9 - ,,,
Q ,1 g L L. (., . a , g qy ., , < < < < < < < e" % ., 3 en.{ Ur, f . , Us -* ' g e 3
- - 1lt / 4 I
. y } "" N < a u a N <- o i a a1 g .,
a ;
~
**- Iz::1h f.:: "l - ?sge 'l -f
9 e g 9
. ..+..m . w' .. .
.. _ - + - = . . . . = - -
l A.i - irh .I;f)fml . ,r- . w,.\ .
^
A
*T?$l, D.4-M ,$h b }di t:Cijj' 5!? $?h.. % .
2*.H r
~
%.3 0.1 $5*.'.*.h 2fti -
4 5
- . #iy. 4...-
by :; - [5 ? . 3JocdS.PQi'
!a ' -
$hYk D~ No;i[#fq'(fN,I
" WicTgM4. ;-
- . .+:p?.~F5:e 5 <raq '
Ys! i
'ik3U.JN
, \ .-{ I
~ x, P
*Y
;ti o 5ir,3f/P 3h'
. h
\g. -0'w.G*d
- N , MMibh -
\ W. 4tz91 D4 ( o 2
> .> Q Xf .
..i..di"fu
- 1
, sI'UN$Y '
j s
+ M 4,D)!**" !Y6 ms3
.. N[d a= t J
$ l5 '
i ~.$a.kIbh$? A$ 5 s f* h ..
j .
"' . Oz
_./ wp '- .
< t T1 .
+ Q s.
%Wh
~ ,
tiv6%i. .: w l%w.'h,0 r.]Y l l : . l -
\ ~
l ,, h:1::n 2 - ?u. :: e :- l .
, ------ --- - . , - - p
l
#'0E * ' '
e VISUAL INSPEOT!QN 7 FINAL INSPECT'ON CHECALIST
.- n.
)
- Jos NO. 1 3I
- .s .
PRECC NC./M $ $ Ob $
- F.5HEET NC. COMMENTS
_I. CHECX PCINTS YES .No N.A. 7 - hkL ##f0R hPCRATIONS MAVC SCCM PjnFonuCD AMD APPROvCD AND SIGMt3 , / OFF GM TMC TRAvCLEM. SPECIFICS WATC*lALS MAVC 3CCM # IMSTALLC3 IN TMC PI PIMG SUS. ASSEMSLY. ALL StamplMG 3fSPLAYC3 QM TM C P l P f 4 G Sus.ASSCWOLY is ACCUAATE AMD CORECS. p POMOS elTM TMC INF0aMatt04 PSCSCMTC3 QM TMC FAstlCAfl0M SMCCT. FINAL CluCMSIONAL CXAMINATION MAS # SCCM PCAFORMC3 AMO TMC SIMCMSIONAL s. INFCAWAffoM MAS SECM REC 320C3 04 TMC FASRICATion SMCET. i CLEAMING MAS SCCM #CRFCAMCC IM ACC340 i ANCC WITH TMC 2COUIRCMCMTS OF TM C GOvC4 MING SPCCIFICATIQM.
. WCLOCR SYMBOLS AMO 4 AO B OG R A P'M I C PolMT LOCAfl0MS MAvt S C CM- ACCUR ATCLY
\ AP*LIC3 AND AAC COMPLCTC. y
,h COM70UA.FIMISM.AMD MCIGMT OF TCL3 CROTM CCuPLICS stTM TMC #COUIRCWCMTS OF TM C gov C AM I NG* S PCCI FI C ATI ON .
ALL'ACCCS$3SLC IMSIOC TCL3 SCA01 MavC p QWPLCTC J014T *CMCTRAT10M AMD AAC FRCC F40a4 UNDENC'TTING. J ..
. j FlCL3 WCL3 CMD #4 CPS AAC WACMINE3 TO ## '
TMC CONFIGURATicM AMD TOLCRAMCCS OICTATC3 QM THE WACHIMIMG SECTCM.
'P I P I NG SUS.ASStueLY 15 FECC Facu 3AuAst.
CXCCS Si vt P t ??! MG. AMO UMACCCPTA38.C # SURFACE 3CFCCTS. ASSCMBLY MAS SCCM INSPCCTC3 AMO APweOvC3 97 TMC AUTM04f:C3 INSPECTQ4 AM0/OR TM C ,, Cu sices C RS SURvCILLANCE SCPECSCMTATIvC. TMC app 40PRIATC C30C STAMP MAS SCCM # APPL!C3. l I ASSCMSLY MAS SCCM CAP *C3 *AINTED. AMO # l IDCMTIFICD IM ACCCROAMCC elTM THC
- ACQUIRCMCMTS OF TM C 30VCamlMG SPCC.
IFICATION. IN5 E E3 S? k~. .
. Appgoygg $ }bb. u cart 4 -8 C M
. -v " bic 3 - ? age 23 of 23 1
Y ..
. . . _ / 4* ip: : ~.--a . : >.-
r
.- ...s ..
E- /9// : * *. C. 'J C .=. . not.' r z .- e ., or, _ . .
' 5LF7UEA C;:. 't.ci u t. art 5:
- . . i : ; .'. Ti.t Lt.is :. r.z.:.:n 1. 7 .'c :.ii.ICT No.
$ . .'* . **'*J . . . - }.'s19 f fLM 3 CG {t',2/7/ & L t /. r,.* p g :s & y?".
E. WE0;F ICAis Cf. NC. t . : . . *. '. 3.. ' E .'.1;iCTQR: p 7. ATL M'4E W!'ll l.V* ? ? N~$ ? 05" YE5 V : i ._ _c'T~bsiCH'dI76C ' 1c,313s'CSITICN 11. QISPCSITl0TJ ST Au;*10r;SU571Fl:1710N y :; ;; -;'. ..: t.:'. ::.7 CF!! Afo:E I Nj t ' N I l-/ 6Y i .. l l
~
j ,*_$_ 75 A*/ N f.- / Q- _S_&_A/.6!.*/lJ'c$ I) s 1 A n s' c A;? ).4 l/tY~N A Ndfs/dO $_ff & f/*'f f.gp in x ng3. l T*6 -" C+ / /* wj M' ,__
\^
\ f ~ 4 a t f *: - _ - - .\.. -. GL - .- - - . - . . . . .
l 3/eoz.swM&EnuoGQ - /. G .x l
,.. /.it i. n. 9 ... s -.
> p t;*_ f f'g a < G H ro Gth w 0 l !o _:.et./L a cf. w .s.
_ 4 _e f_ .s. G *o c i a .< o r.v u e ; y n . 1 .l 1 __
7/
\ L, . - J n, w-
\ .. _. _ .. . I i. =.
I.5 Q.eb. T 3 - - IL.- w F \ i ,d& n.s ,f.-a? ( f7 I /_/-f1 0.C33 /2-63 I -l / .. . .
.ct,5_p.f 86 )2 -/AH 1
' 1 ^ <-6,S;? s,.G ,i:GpF s n ,,
. _j.fr .5_Of 34- / 2 ~f3H \ \ i o. ; ft., isir d r..es . /
/2_5 //_8 /2 - 78// l l (7) d A r ,la4 ies a sw -Ica i 1 on _n x /- . . . . . !i
_.k(,..m - i, i :; : . 3 = g- = : - w ~ + m S Mi/A%I N3
-~
I i F re 4 t- % Al- l W. . \ M WM E'~
- 12. AEVIEW SOAAD (RECP RED CN AL s -M AEPAIR 0 S!,,TIC,NSl
*. j'j ! . .- ? 7fhg
.yf[
/~-.. M~L b -
- L '
k!" C:Nstai 8 N Er n. :; n
. f</N Y Y T)$gz:w$7 S&1. Op SPONSOR ENGA SATE ~ 3&E d ' CATE * * "' W OAE
' O
_ - _ _ { CG&E-- _ =_ ,. x _ _ _ ,
- - - - ' =
y
. . -* . . . = - -M
- 12. REPAlR/R EWO R K COMPT.ET.E ..A.1D. AC*EPT.ABLE
,.se.i-
. : ... ^ .
%% s. t. A .;
Y?"* b p -~
... - r
' ~ J. ."4 .:. -.
.~ .).'..a.-
CATE . INSPECTO R/EN GitiEEA
? -
- 14. CAUSE 11.C3RRECTIVE ACT!QN
""
- M yfa C,o 1,,sy._f >
/ f f"" % da :k p' J c z.~1.< s w g d ,g
#4<> $ occ r.,ex e./ Ws,,s. of, es' /
J) .
.. :7 w ~ ,.s.,
mfl% . ~. J ye -'. a*m 24 * * *
.,1
..c'.-,,..
,..: -r e '.u 2'q-r:"- . "- . . .: *
./f,,tsd . a.-. m as s ~- as'f.q.'d p<
-^ -
?-.: . .s -- - . -
, . . -. . . u ,. -
m A ,,,, / s um k &.? '- 4*'
$..M:;.
" C3 ' c. 2 .
.v..Na r ict.o m. : .4c si. sai. m. a.a. :st. :A ^bo to"'*-2 (*[,3 f~ j S
1 a . , e 1
.-- - . - l l
l
?
. . . , ,- . .r . . C . . .--. . . - . : .: . ., i F;"i
.;j;y 1 ATs:s l N _!
- 5 " - t- 1 _ O T ,,,_
- . 7 ". ;;;t T.8. A07 N C. ' !"%:i * * '.! F. ';~ C A ?.a '.* E:
. f . ; .;*A*. ; ; ;*.'.c. I ~.. ~.!.1 tat'J Ti!.t.f.A:/E:
T . * * , I .-v Fire Freels 1:5E 2171 Full-2: Freer
~
. . : ,; ;' 7 J a. s o.: E. i*.:5iti;R: 7. : ATE:
L Ui;;F'OAI';t. NO. l A3ME i
- .:7.: 115 J. na .e.=rer I 7/5/79 E-2235t YESG t. c _
10 UI1?OSIIION ' ll CIIICIIIIUN l'fIIDEIiCII?J171f101,IlON
$ * ! ! *.i .?h' *,'. C F P. * *. * * *. 5 ? ? '? ! *.01 i ,
- l
.: u . .w I I I )
, . . . . . ,. s g . ., % - . s - .* s f,,, _. 4 ~ % s -- - ,,.; . A '
*%'; =nt l !/r) P, m .9 R a % % .- t l
i $ 0W L %t %' e tAs . l 7m1 : .
.! ?;oels were rolled off of truck en :o l I dj,,, Jge,fg .= 3 ,
l l cr wAs.= .d e ,.m , N treund and st-ikiss other secels.
- I
! ts, : e.t e . l
! I A e e-.4 a - % u a .;- 3 n .'
_ !,p el 'i.:-y e es f a i
} _,p*5 051512-63 4 dl se J--s e V c W. /5 f @ - '
lys 0-?.A12-1.G l f . .{ - iv.5 CS3A12-53*d l ? lg wA A,,,,, ,, g g I *S !T. -_'.l 2-I33 _m..,.,,___. .*~s'f QO S: 1-5 M- _ . , , , , . _ i (f) 4 /D 3 ** .' _---a c
*f .. .= . -- . -t :::- '^
'- ~
esa A - . h< - I- ~ : e ) - ~ ~ .x . , .
'! N 7 W %i ti uI %N E W[/ a Mi fi d i
}Y G '
% Y. $
h*@~g ; i n 3 REVfCW30A (RECUIRED QN AWMR DISPCSF }$3** -
.i .
-t -eo .
f;.~.r~ . -
,54 .
- Z $.
7..l3/
's7
< s .z'
_,= =, .~ w - QEl CONST,RI.: CTICN ENGR. OA' M ilb "-** ' " ' ' 44 % ** - N'% .- [.Iw y 7 3&L C3&E'SFONSON ENGR OATE ' ~ C3&E 0.A.&3.' OATE KE! OAE . . _ CATE'-
- 13. RET air /REWCRK_ COMP. . ... -
l
- m. . . . . ' ETE AND
. . .. AC:EFTABLE . ~
DATE
~
* (NSPECTO RIEN GIN E E A l
l 15.0CRRECTIVE ACTION 14 OAUSE g
- p o c o es.g se.i. tX CM 'D' f
avs M u1 :--] a If Ar* a.a , J. n'% % ce ct Arcec?
- 1- . c r d "I f.44 s
_$.LA.3.o w.ok )r- R% : * , :,..a':r~ 4 ba: ,:- s-:$... e . '" ~ ~ r ...- s.,;. .:- .- tm.: ~ ,.%. . " i. ..- -
-+-_4 ,.w_ -. ..
1 ^ cmm R.A.<a *m n , -
* ?.xhth t: ? - ?nge L :! '.
/*y
. : a rms m. ::st. m.sai. rts. u. rs t. :A rescs (cass.: g-"' /g -J a c: "c e
. * - ' 'T D ~: . : : : ::.5 t : .~.: fb.cY. &' b /..
a, 7.c fer enc e: O C.': -0 * .'- _ j - - . . .
,_3e ff cier.:y/ ;evia: ion C:arifics: ice Calit ra:ien/Tes: . tee :d A :di:/T 20:.-up Suteentrae::: Surved::a.ca Surle111ance !sfer:.a:f::
i
~
Mu k sr.- e. E (e m~ GZ::IT.A2. CISIIVA!!O::!/OIIC?.!? TIC:~: NS E'- J 91 ( ; : k A\ c) Sb'o o o L. ieccr .
\C.c.9d1.a-s d l Sp~ L p , e e.e- v\ s - o 8 - S B - 12. - 4 3 a^r d "= x-A'sc0
"/
- 6 f*I L 8,xl-n-e.
m s - E " '- " to , /"hc a 'h*-c' v- s- , S. Aa L ,o i e-ce Mf / /- 8-/2. - 7 8 W dd ~ '(s U apli cf >> ,cci r , ', a AAdd-v E b k a. aAkr- s <ba+ 7 s.u, e b 917~'E.~c /
- - ~
Rep.or: 7:= pared 37 : A8M#d $d Uy aes "7 /.gZ ? /~7 0
'/ / /
pf ceficiency is NcnconfoWng in Nature, Lis:: E
.I. Reference Drawing, Spec. or Std.
- 2. Specific Ioca: don
~
CORR.ICTIVE ACTICN STA.rfENT .- e 'e "4 ( J *
\-
corroe:1eeAcedenveriftidsy.[
~
. cae, mo t: : - rage : of t
I o . . . j 1 l
~ .
}
e: . u :u:1. .: ..- id.sdE -
,i reference: 02:: ,
i
, * *f f f + :4r /~ c vi > f n C arifica:!c.s 1
,, Calib ra t.f on/Tes t 7.,:: !
. ,[ A3f:/TcM:2.: . . ;
_Subcentracte.r Surveillance durveillance Infc,r .4 :
~
i s G'.NI Jd CISI2?A~ICNs/DIsCAl?~ICN: S T S ~ O*. /l/$ . 1 3
/St./AL ///d Ad.C7$ A u:, [/4 4 G~I' v/fd4.5" C A./ ! T.
dd N W427 fed'AiQ //:7:tf d7 E.3 /2 -&.A s //IT 5"$ ? M i' 'l i
//71S C 2' 8 A /3 ~ sa // o / /s~r.5 // 2 / 2 - 7 8 / V' A s./4
//MS l0 2 A/G -/d// /.V T , $dA // k .[~~/ ?// d'If $ A
-~~ .-
M'///O f//kAf d'Y Ar G G d'~.0 7 A"$r.. 7 .
'f d "* t <.///W //.9 A AAGA[.^u'7" WC/M T t . f r$ ..-.
) . .
Report 7:epared 3y: M. c. gxp 3,t, [- , 7
, if Deficiency is Nonconfor ist in Nacure, I.ist:
..'.'t.
s,.e. or seji . W //g A f fff.
- t. 2.ferene. 3r = ,
? -:.2 4 E j.'
%.w.- r Css./9 &u.... -%.: - 4.,.. : :.;.:-. ,z.,w.~::s.m..
~...
. .25A.
. ~
- 2. spec 1!1e 1.oes 1'on - w w/~;.-x .,,4 ,%s9'
%sk 1
. n
.2.G i: .
- a, . . . . . . - 4 r r ' .... . . ..
. ; . . ~. __
.. .. . . . . . . . _ . . .. . . .;y
.w. g.3
. ~,=< c.
. ... ,,.., , . r., 2p . ;.
emCu.rt >cnc., s r om -. -
- -a
. . . m. . r.-
,, a o 0x.84u.;4vd'~/ eSA. 4"'5.*~;. .: ..Y. .
. . .s
~ .
~
m
. :. :..=. ~9..
- .L.n .. .? -; . a L) .
. . . . lc.. '.:.O h!$."?-y a".>$.-?!EifN&?h?
- . w-
~
.x u :.w.er n : su - .
M Dat ' [ [~ 7
' ' ~
corrective Action verified 3y:
/ -
e t3t- a - ? age of t
\
\
- i. .-
- . . . .b ..
s.Ar!Lh Ir:Osr:rtR3,1N - NCNCONFORf.uNCE REPOR-' i
! NQ. E-101I h'i ?
vi*.* is Zit.**.'$ FO*.".'I A STAT 10f PAGE \ OF
,, .f;57 Al s t.T Ctp r;*,. 2. QwG,it:37 ALLA7 ct; t;At/t: 3. PC/CCri TR ACT N O.- 4. 5UPPt.iCRI;;fot AAC1 CR N AME.
belov ?i,e Spools CC&E 2171
? ullman ?ower
,,,. ri C f t 0t; rl. AN N O..
5.tN PECTOR: 7.QATE: 3. ;PE C; FICA TICri n o. agg p, 6.' W 113 , J. Dee r .restar t' 7-5-70 R-205 9 b. YESC NO C
~
,,5 Cal? TIC.*.%F t40NC0r:FORMANCE 10. DISPOSITION 11. 13PO SI T10 N 1N ST R pTI Ct:3,lJUSTI FI CA il C N I
, i eIFar$: _
l ~-- b o e ._ ,, 2 a q- c tWM1;. P2:2 rial to be unloaded vith ! I c:r M_ t %u-~ b! ells #
.,;.;* f ove d ='{ uipmen t l l O _
~
I h k. i < cit .=.4 Y S u h.L e"'m qg t M . _. .; a;.c=- . u(cg,A$.,
--- I Cds 1 focolswerereliddoff_oftruck l !
h --Occ o % o. k _ S d /ide_( T
. . . :J aron =ed and strikisq-ather sooels, s ft',
l a 24 C. 2 p_ ,.
. I fie w e e V ! - \'
. ;..s -l Uca.hais- l l g , , ,, , ,[ sa 4-@,,.g,4 e =.
\
U*Sh8M312-63 _ _ _ _ l fu ,J < q= --M Q t ntM t 1. .g f /D T /f) n:s o % A12- u a ixNi i--
!- i 1 A, - a 5
'""45 OSitA19 53H I
( 5 11til: 733 bb . ., n; a g r,_g 1,,, c
. _ D'S 0!! Al2-lC3
' 9 ,' . a a h. gv i h ,, O ._t k -'1e-l A 4 4 _b'" ' ( a.AL.S M_ h M_ . 4-h h%. .u. Li c ~~ e:" , A .ms i
; 3N7N. i b m'"*n 1
O f f. L *1.JL l l 1Mu d . I I i n -
N SC:RO (REQUIRED 3N ALL ACCE7T/ REPAIR : SP051 TION 51 '
Q g 3 5 I -W Kit CONSTRt)C"!*** :NGR 3 ATE
.' A- g~ . -' $ /.,
**~
CATE C &E SPCNSCR ENGR OAT! Y f '. 03&E / A.LS F 3AQ KEl CAE
\" -
- 7 / 3 EC*.!!X COMPT.ETE AND AC TFTA8t! : 4 CAe EA OpW- u:~.-- W HA 6 /7f7
.:/
i &lb INSPE C*0 RIEN GIN Eia
,CATE 7L \
t
- 15. 00RREC IVE ACTICN Pipe Spools were dropped 'ros carriers : Tuck *aed s ;round. Sia correc:ive action required.
This occurred af:ar regu:Ar working
-s hours and .2s the resul: of a =1s- , '
y ) in:2rprta a:1cn of in:serue:1ans g,1ves ,' _.* to cruck drivers s Ex=1bi: I - ? age O s f '.
)
- a y
- ti e es e e .. i d e., ae ,,,e. e .. c e .e . . e . = / I * * *
- n e u =^ a-I
, . 1.
, ,gr t: tNCINCCt 5. tNC. . NONCCh. .tRt.'ANCC R EPCTtT g ,,ir,7t"*t. ltPCWCn STAfr0N N O. ~-ISO 7 l' ACE I 0F I g pg it.TictJ N O. 2.QW / INSTALLATION NA!.:E: 3. 70/r:cuinACT t:0. 4. S url'tt E lii;;C:;7 a ACT Ca NA:.:E:
- 5 f. r,._]3. l.a # PIPS.S P.00.18 C.pt.i' 21 71 Pulln.n_ > cy
' ,,,3,.girlste 7 tat: No.: G. !Nr.PE CTO P.: 7 ATE: 3. SPE:trICAllct; No. ,g.,g g
~
, 9,0tscalP110tl 0F N0fdCONFORMAti:1 S , Pc.d,., a 4
10.Ol:POSITICt; a.-9-n a2:55 yEsc uct
- 11. Ol! POSITION INSTRUCTICN:/JUSTIFIC1. TION FiOUIRDE**T: Material unloaded with l c c. A - ---
-- n ,p , , , 4 eparoved equipmsnc. *
~
l L n ~,t e .f e . n, . - 1 I aul:: Spools were rolled of' : uck I Sc e e.).,: s .
- s l 1 1_ ) ,d,l. .
...,d .I (.f w. , /; ,, , y . .
I on to ::eund and strikin;: other secelsl l 'r 8 0. - -b ar.-Id.f b b l ~j . ,,, Mb ,1 h raa , as per E-1911 ':cv.2 l ,,i..,- Dis:csitten 2 all fille: velds l l4 l-o. . r cc k O H~ % ._ ~~. r., .
< /
l visually inspected accepted as per l l ,,,/ yg 6, , ,, , ( Q ly [,., SR 2231 l yg,/ _ l ,_j _ m 's ec 7f,d , S Q,,, Disposi: ion 1 cot:pla:ed all l l C ,. , . ,.h [ e, . 7 ,, er.v s bute radiocrached (IMS 0823 12-63 had ! rajec.sble surface indicacico-open) l ah r_ _4/I d r I, . e a. . h' l l Q ,[,, h 4,j/) ',s ,; ArJ.,_ {.2'.S 11312 73H had rajectable lack of l w , l tf .b f_,/ M8f Q.. . ,) v l Ion-coen) (b!S 103A12 1CH had ref ect- l ha lack of fusion-open)(IMSO934-1: l __ m d -- ,-, .- - = 1 l 1>Ji- Acc::ptable 3uer & Ti.le:s- losed) l i l'y 8' i l(D:508BA-12 53H-Acceptable 3ct: & Ti2.leh-t r** ? hg[O I lC10 sed) l l k$( r[. f./,e f l h n g== r-~ l . l/A-l"?* I .-
$ 9
- 12. REVtEW !OARO (AECUlRED CN ALL AC EFT / REPAIR OtSPOSITIONS' =- - --
1=-
,, j fg e- Kil CON:TRUC !CN ENG7d 3 ATE S&L DATE CG&E SPONSO R ENGli OATE 03&E Q A.L*l. CATE K11 QAE
- 12. R EPAIR/R EWO R K OOt.PLSTE AND ACO!? TABLE 1
INSPECTOR /ENGINEin DATE
- 14. :Au:E I 1E. CORRECT!VC ACTION
.s ..p.,a, :c.s f,>,
s sere sws uhid~ w . Q- d- L
/r~r$ L c.j, % r w r4-- J dw f u- & L'
ll fw- .,,. f cx< e : - 7L:. O e < <A--.i . m l , tx.ub t: : - 7 2se. . : f . l o.sc,..ets m.:c. c m. u m.~.m no..u.s m,.ici f - w e a-o. \ 1 C.m 36 / 0 ~ 1
[ 1 e . , .
%.:l G - 3 Ci-/ i'!
XAi!ER Cf Cff;fC't0,1NC. . pgggggg gg3,iAgggfi,*[fictg , m:. it. zitant a r*: :En :TATIC:s NO. E-1997 PA0E _ f
- 2. art;/t::sTALLAilot: t:A?.:E:
. . - CF - _ ..!.. __ _ _ _ .
. :/ :/t::st Att Af ter ::C. 3.ro/ cat. r:A .T to o. 4.surPuttit:at;;r.A::cc.::A:.:E; 4._.3.t f#
.3 c:: PLAT: ric.:
?.!?S ! pools
- 5. lf45tECT08:
C01.C 1171 . Pull:*an .?nve.r.
- . :t. 7. 0AT E: l 4. SPECIFICAItf., '40. A;.;;
A . fc.l b r., 8 79 l H2:55 YES $f NO C
- 1. 3 E3 AlPTICN CF !!C!:03:'F0ft!JANCE 10.083703171C:
l 11. 015PC3iTICf:lf;5T3UCTIC::!/JU;Tif4 t:Afi~C l 7.I';L*I'KZ"-* *:b !'.s terial unicaded with l l cc 4 - --
,. g l -
1: proved cuidament.
- l o
n%
$* m\ .
- y. _ , g n .3, 1
Taul:: Spools were rolled off e uck l .Scuof.e s . ,* g l I dJ.l. .. . h. 4.. . I l . , .y . l, . , . . .f
- :o ground and s:-iking other scools! . ,-I l l *
- I
- p. r.
I...- s b ,- m lo s lg , .ns ssr(C-1911 Rev.2 .l,,. .L'.. ,l k. f c . .. . l Discosition 2 all fille veldsl L Q i< .4 L3 ' :c e >.' r_ i n.. . . .. -i-,'f.1 dsually inspected ac:apted as per l 7 , , [1] ,,,/ ,e. ,. S, ,yt . . k,,
~
.) ,, /.; ,( .
U 1251 b0 l o 1 h 'Di i: d.,I , A1.dcc
~
I..S 9 . s'.'i l [d C k[l C, _ Disposition 1 cec:plecad all .J ~'.w /,,.3 f ,. , ,. , ,l
;c: erdiograched (D'S 0833 12-63 had I b I.d') , b '. . / JI r
!. ., M , . k.a #
ejectable surfaca indica:ica-open) ll V (.jl Q. ( y,. ij f*' _ - ,\ , f. .
.?.5 11312 73H had rejectable lack of l! U fl ""I . , h, . / ,% .I ." p ,..
cen) (U:S 1C3A12 1CH had rejeceb [7 - -
~-
m
..ek of fusion-open) (U:5093A-12 l ) 77f / f ,,pf i, -h > f , f ;y, f gf f y g g , g y,,,yf g g T ,
4 - Acceptable 3ut: & Fila:s-Closed) l ( da sVM d'. EdC. ' % jnrz:ccd.:/7 of [/f.O /{
- .5053A-12 53H-Acceptabic 3uct & Tille':- [ Ef'/5~4S.8M/2-/A8 g?s-/ ////,283d-// .55',f )
.. scd) l } /.S 47CCCd7d/[.' d N , . I. : ,, i t .
, m z .- e s ,
}//'
,t! VIEW ECAA0]EculAEQ QN ALL AC 1?T/TIEPAIR CIS7031710NS)
.c: m wi .. m r:em.
fg ' Q[@ f / 'a#
,j -f , ,. j e,/ /- -
K!! CCdSTRUC*1CN ENGR [: ATE
. W A S $ .es s' / N i' 8 8 5 1o -t2.-7 7 $ ;!. 5 /) !Wi6lN ,ICII7 . _'"7"~, aj.g ,7_ *]L DATE g&E $PCN20R ENGa DATE C3&E c.A.13. DATE CAi 0,.
w.uaiaCmax C:=7 ape 4c::grAsts . _ INSPECTO R/ENGIN EE A CAIE 7.,W3 E l 15. C0ftt!EC*1VE ACTICN
.s.. W a., :0 G ,w i n / m a ~ 4 4 # w .n L a <Am iat> % $ ,- e ~ .f 4 7:~ % u~-d Jo,.c.g ., fg
>y- - emf cu< s M i k < k '~.
.y
. ..1 m13 t: :f .
..........,g,..u.,,,...........s,.......n . .. - x - 7n.. i . . . . .. ,
c d .%- p. -
,_ ~
* . , e l
.I .-
** :. .'s t l t t. ; *, t '. t i * *. *. s' e 4 o. w. m. o.= n. .* . f . . .*.*.
- n' w*. * .q 2.w3. *' p =e
%, I, PA
- C QF _,
NO.** _ *d _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . . . .
' y.a?i 1.w .7; t.".".!.F F * .'.!_r i.T ATIC:* . _ -
i SUFFLtiM .*.!
- a ~T R r4 A:ag.
* *. '. Q.
Z. 2.*i"..If STAL LAT10t; fiAta1: 2. P CI'0 .
- R a *.T f4 0.
- 1.
- l.:
2 1 .. .i.....s l t
......3
. . . . . . . . . .....m
_ . - - T. A E: 8.3flC F8CAI6Cte t.Q. As.ag
- 1. it;;H OTC:. Pt. At.140.; L.1:43PEC'OR: ,,
g.... _ , . . . . . . v....
......,, ygg Q .;g c 4 , . . . . . . .. - '
g i
- 3. GEICK;7T13N OF f af;Cct:TORflA!;CE l10.3t5P03171C:4l 11. Q:SPO$m Cf; if;3T MICTIC :!/JU37.7 tCATICf .
, i s-
* * - * . "; " ; n.
I I c. < f . _........i......_..,,l . ......
. ....-..~. et. .
l l '
. . .. r , . . #... .. _- . .n+. . .s ..
.t 'I 1
. 'l .. .
. . . , . . . . . , l l
'l i. .e ;- . ._ m. . .. . . . > . ... . : ?.$...=....a . . . . . .
.). C .3_, l'
_. . . . . . ..s.c. r. . . A.,
.. . l" 3 s. . . .
- l. .. . . ~ . -
. T . *. . . . ..
- L'.:: n & ,:~ 5 .. i. . . . z'1 .. -- .- .
.>.... ....~... : f.
i *t*.~*.. ~.a**- m ..: .
-**t.' c':* t~ *H =
.i,,=. ,, .
.? y , . , ,
. p. ,
. ,n..s .. . c .1 2Cr .
. . . 4. c* . .
. . . . . . . .. '4,.
. s I I 1.. i .,,'..,. ,, . .:. . . . . , .
,i see...
* ., .s. . . , I . .?.' %. .a , a .- - 1. . f_ .
i i *. .*;**.i* *.- e i ! . , ?' . ,
. ... . . . , . . g..,,
l 1.ed,ri * . . , . * ,). . U - e . .- s . . l
,m*.... ....
)..=........,............ l l=,. t...,..;. .i.
I I Ie . '. . < .r' ... 0.,. .. 5 a.. ' . j j ,
,c, , .. . . . . , , . .
q _.
.....,:. . .4,, .4,
. . s.2 16 .. -
t l'r ..1, s ..:- 4) , , , ,,,,., a . ......e. T _.4.. . .% *.
.*. . .... ..a - I
..g.e . i l . ,.s. g. ,.,,,y
, h,
.a. ~..-...=*.s- .* .
. .4 .. ( .
I I
' l l i ( **e t.: .: . 2 f *."' lbcrts
- f. 57.. )
l ...- , .. l
.l , ,J , ,
. , , j , ,.
12.KEVIEW SCARD (REQU:P.ED CM ALL AC:!PT/ REPAIR CISPC$m0N$) ,) KEl *:r:573UC ::: !! :R. 0 A T' 00&E 0.A.P.:. ATE Cil OAE
, S&L DATE C3&E SPONsCR ENGR 3A E
- 12. REPAIR /REWO R K CQiaPt.ETE AND ACCEPTA8tf 4 I i
INSPE TQR,iNGiti!!R OATI 15 *0RRECTivE ACTICN '
- 14. CAust 6_. . a. c. ,w:.s. - 3:. e i., .*~ . :. a -5. >.., A :.-
. N .c .
,.cS[ , d..n:.::
-/ :.f: ; m-/ /. 3 . ..'~ . -[r . . - ~~".. < .- .-- ey e _. . . g.'t _.. - . .
e . ,. .. . -- .a- , .,m ..... / ;i c ...m . . : . ._. :. s. , , - w s-.->:< .
/.
.- s .
d'
, r*
.i Exhi'si: *
- ? age *. :" 1 6 ..
m
--l $ O O.,
1 1 WELD CY-606 I i ATTACHMENT 5
,. c m 9
~s
s e ' e , I s - l i ' l
%1 l I ,t
- i l l
. \
k%. l
*l is-{ N '\N ,.
I - l r t
?,)
sa ::: i I l M l
.ll .d 4
L W -s
, l 5, 1 i ' ' M 21 : til 9 Gi s<u-isi I l di : '
s .5 : Ju,ip i.s. . .'. . w: ::l. . , t e. !.
' GN f ; -
*8
= T '
- 2 =e g. i N. * -
a
- r a 3: si
~ ci a 5 i l i g [ l g ow _.
2t*2 esj Q ! [
. = 7 m z4=<-
N
- 4 "l 4 ?g -
C4 .1 N[_ w B w.k. j j i % l6- .-@ aL
- 6 1
t a
,,, y ; +l 4g ,
t 2
$ l <
i c W i 4l N , wl 2-h ' . IQ h
, . l 4.
'g
'I i. k l -
1
) o .,. ,j y -
',-.e '. ' .
,(,- {
; y' . i ] ..',, ; )" k' .
s%a u i l u a
; \,
$ 1 I
=
o'c ' = I: I
@1: @ :
i N. c
%o.f., j e! e si h I . ,- ,
i l ,
) % , l. W k i
wma s 3of l 3 CI
'O.
"4a 1
{ l [, < 2
- a E*j 2k =
e 2n of
- i s i i e ! a :;I
- e l
i; E t,
* [' -
! i 0
I I 1,111 2= i, i e
-I E. J Et! E ' P@ >A E g-i.ti. y:
; i . -
,< -i -
Y:1. * !
-=I 3 u
;4 s .c 3 =
- .i a: .l i
-. =4
=
y >s-3 ;5 i 1 e =
- A =t 2 M,.
e- . ; . 22,.=_sl 1, ' M i! Ei 4 . I!@ l @> ! . l@ }.@ J@ t l@ = !@ .@ /N'r-
.. . s; 5! t.t i i e -
i E e., :ui!' I e 5 .i
. si } il 4
1
- - S j
i
- m21-2 2i e: et! sl
.i ! >
il n - l . m a- o. j Ns -
- s. , Wi 1
E i 4 ; il . -, =cit ' s l t, :. I-9I =)
<we.c .-].
3
; : E -
l 1- 3 3 a .
'I
. =
= .1'
. I s
- ,6 = ', , i 3:e
- a l a, ,
- -. = .s= =
'r;- I a. s
= si si I.,+v. :. 1; 2 i: -
i i ! l =g < v -s 5. i i i .>, '
<=
z c;a .
;. ,. .I.
.> > -- a I . .. --
a .. a n ,a, , . 3 gl g a, _. e_: i ,
. e c . -.e- e i, !
i i .- i, _ . _s l 4 1 l
., i
~- .3 ? - . - . . .
l.!
- l g '
. in *{ i; I; ' :51 . j i i >l l l 5 l ; Zj< ::: =, -'l'!
3 . ,: 1 , i l i
; eil 9 ! I It i N st u J d S 3 - &.<..d v.? i l,
\
.j .):di' lt li ~2 h lFl.
i- 35 % iN4 =! l !!I'<! "'l w a f e i e s i . . s!g cv
- j i
a; N
- i
> : i 2 :
i i s 3 .; 5; i i:1:ii
. , e;
- .i m
=i x '::
A - :. ij -.:-5 ' ' -5 9 i l.
.i 7 .Ei;- '
!. c .i g
-! .l :: N
,.! =i r
,4 i l i
qt-
- i. q%
. v2 =s i --
- i _r. : ,.
Ni . . ., i, =<, t >,e,. i le< 1- , : _
- n. yi ii--ii f, .
' ?
!%5u !;ed,:- !, t
!e .!. E. i. 5!i!. .,H$: , , - G d l. ! :r , i.
i t. 3, wg..
- =. 2 ,
- a. .,. .
s < , ,i :
!il i -
t= - :. . . 5l ik!
'3 l M ! wig i . .!i.?.p, 5. .. '. i 5 i
, .. .m:
i i iI.[ I!q!. r 5
- ',.f - . :
,fe
*1 I
-~ ~; :
5 ;a e
= :
- =gi
_i
=
[l!- 5: 5
~
- t- .
;.,L.
l s '3!1, , =; .:l ; F. ; 4 L .) 5= l'= t -tj c _. . ~ : E,
-, s. -:2 i..' a : -t , .. I ; ..-
i, ..:
.]3)*9' l ; =: , :, .
- e-3 .! *-
*--.3
. i r li e. : 3 s. 3
, r. , 8 2 . ,i :,,4 -.q--i.i 6,a t' 4
..: "' H ri >t ,t (- -- -- ' i-3> i > ,. ; w.i i g
~- 2 1 2 lc
.z
- a. > = -
e 'e a. l@-- ie 4 e (i , 6'8 :b 5 3 C ! d 5 ^ 0 5, ' f 3 3 3i 2 b'O'. *. !@ 'l a' a l @'. i'. _
= - -
i e . .. - I w . l.. , l.l i ,. - r .'** ., s . e .
- o *' ; l l; ::,, , , ,
- 83 j ; .
, 4 ao
- [ .,. .
.s =
e d f I g , a
. 3 6 * . : , t * f cc <
= kj s 2 (,;!),f
..g w . T, ' is.4 i . I i !g . a, a 2 a -.. .o a **-
'8 lif d - ;!..'). ' , sa -
- i.
'I- e s
! dh..
's e
i, Ie .<<- 8 -
=. #
I .l ,I i, ; l .
=. c 21 ,. ;, ' ' . '- * . .e -* t i .: ; . . ,
s
*. Wt- e- n. p :
<,5 E st .
a.s s s s.3- ; 33 !g il r. ! *2i M Q ~o/ /" { !*s< . 'a it .' :.1- . t
, e -.-
- u sa
=jj .
j
/
'M4/* I,s: , ?eiq IE 8% q..w
'T 4 s
=
5\4.\ e s * ; c '.a ya ,* .!O
*7 l
.; 5 \ ~"- , ,
n l
* ,3,\. s
.g
-. -i
.q z
,gg
.Y Y
--l-O 41 4
' i-!! h, w 1 h - / 'I ,
- f. .
e 1
. 4 m 1 e.,
5; : o 4 . . t
/- t :t 2/.'g
!.<* a,
% - l t g=6.0 7 ..t . j l '
.o% , 's
. I i s.i.:. Ai/ i q@1! '/
.' '-/,.
E g.
"l -
' 5f3 '/
\
\ ,y - * ., \
Ja,!$1 <. .J- . !. e. . %, 3.! .
.m ,
- m. -
't 3]w!
w;x .t.:
- r. .
* /
// ' -.
ae S I N . f
\/ f 37 I a .-h. 5< -l.= I, i, m i :
'f'*A. a g
' =- 5-Q r, p;,g -'- s : i s, :: '\,
4 _.-._
- a. :~c .;;s s .s ~..
- y
~
a': - t . m a:- om , a =
- 2 im a, er -
, ,.c3 . .'\ .,, s's -
- s,.s. a. :.
y/ - . t i , t2
;a wv.,
. .,r. ~/ \ *,. ~. :4in -
k
/ '
.m f /
\ 'n. f . . . .
f p -
\ [ N ,jr '*, sh . Gli..
'oO xQ.t 3
N+ i u ,,
; h-.
'E - .'
- u. a,.;m%
se.e
~
s- *' e , , '1*=* I.. ~..?s.-u. .
\ I
==>r :.: :-
=~~=' k7
- mi 4 "Y
..M.- -
-.-. \j -
- ..Lp4- ;s I
6
- -m-oonme
f= .1 ; . . .m. . . ;- -- -:- . . . . w.- - s ?':A.C ** -- -
- A . .: .; * .:. . J. . L .:.h:. .i : 1. :::w. .
f t;:.Q.h ,** . .. W .:- . s::ra.,
.:s, y . . :.s. .:r . .?
. #' - ^- x.,. s .m sE- , , ,.a.
. t 2
...:.s
.s
.e
.s .
,. t. .e= 5,1,;
~~ ..
e Q :,,: .:.?- y .. w l' '*:' 'Ta ~ - - 4.2.- . 5
, Y.-
.s:.:.:. t *: h. .e
.e .
z t.
) <e .
,4 i.
u N. . . r-. F . ::3 , v. . g.. ,
,3w3I we in
.A 3 f r. -
1
.. e qm u g
a n n -
- S z -*
}r ?.
.S s.1".
E n
. 2 .E
+
3=
=
4
= gc :
?. . ? .,L. s N Cl .i. ]o s 1, .,. .
D a y3 - u3u l - p a.
. -. &y &y .- *~. . 9 \
1
<q .. .
, g 2 *
'A --
. '\ <
3 , n. 4
- a m w W Ms w.
g % l u"i s yht%
.f. s LC;
<sls%\t. {
i ,, l $ r '$
.u 1
g s
,g g
1 a Qg
- y 3
4 -1 v 3 a 4 o, h z l @wi @ wi -
,,, N.
,l -
h D b Y % 2
\' -
N- .
< i 3- 1 g N M sa= =
c i 1 q D 2
'4 ,
; l.
Dr
- < ~ ..- -
u.
=3s y
z z 3 3
.c
.(Cd
. o,
- T, z ji4
., il 51 j c 5 s = c M.i .", .7
'u" A,
* .. I g
- g , .
3
. d ~373 m -7 E
- I 5 a ,. g <
rd t d , .2 . .. ls
.a 3 3 "T ; o E $ o. 'X 1 ?. .!, '.". .- g . . e,, u
; e 7, . a .
>I: 4 >-
rs :
. O se Ci g 4 -
2 s 2 : 3 z >- _ g~ - E a . r s.y E7s .i@~~@ @ j @ j @~ @' @ tN;;
~~
Sq i 5 i @
" ::; a ia i - p .. . , tra a - .
n ! .. W. 585 1=4 c-a '>~ ln
? .
s -[ U2- tti -' .i t i 4
.@ P' za: t
.i '-
K 2 .
. Bf 3 f. ; ..* 2 t- ". .. %
w e M e ( o.u.agg ** a . 9.. 4 , y "'. g, 3 k .3 I$ 1&m,> ,..- a . c. b *3 . 4g m.
== g M
>o c3 ec 6
. t E
o. 11 3 T-a- - -
.lr i 2
, p.3 u Qg :,. .
gw .w -
- ; L -
. :J :a -
z: m- %q . Z M ss s > . > > Nl <= -w 0.1 p 3 --Q $, E D- g, hl 2 t.4,i h .
. v; -
,c4t zfy 4 , . ..
.3 ..
. j z, ;: >- e: : .
--4 lC m .. --
ca. s . . . . o, , .;j.
.. f.:"J . . - -
g*
>e F.'.* c. .**,, : .
' .p, t, 3,.:. .;.E.[.
.. - , , .i.
.g :2a g- j ,
-' ..,+.: .?-~ i. :-= : . u.
. 5 ,. -
Q - a t
-i: . .:--
. gr:- .q::.
. 2 yw . ," q ~ ..cya. x .;;. .3y - *.
.c
- z. -
z Cf. = . l . . o d?.fd, 4
;C '3",$
, =7 y1 4
7'g Q~
.e { '
~g..
, . o,) -
V- .
-]%.
. w..
c :;
;-: :a .-
. ;.j d:..
[ >+ > ; CL Q .g e .~ . a. -
. . r.,
.::w.v gge ,
c, , -u c - a di te) d2 . .
' rd .. .
- . <]i 2 'I)Y 5
*"**1' G 1 p. . .. . i.
~
., : : c. ,. ;?i'. .4.: . 3 . . .: . .. . s . --
f-N
.'h .
E, } rh* 'i ~[ *
- M:. ~ EUEf 2EEf -: -
2Ef fp ,E ,. Y l-
'+
- c.< < ,& 1 - ' .., .:
=-)
t -
. -r.N- % . , ;
; y
--e.<.. .. , g L zu .-
5 g .
.; 5 . .Q;.
9 r. : g. . . _ , ,
. . . + ._
....3
.. t; y . -
; . ... .~ , , - .
. w ..
. . ~ .-
5 c .s .- .u...... 1.
, . .. m .
a. s.- Q
,3 z .1 ** f-- - . -
. .m. . . 0. .&. - .:.... ..
,W .' .V 7
2
. II * -. 5 f, *,,' =[ '.
t. I -'
= .
>- c =6 x .
45 -- ... - w - -
;K' . v- :- e c g -- . .
Q 3 N 't x I i
- 3 3g-} ;. ((-
y ,, 73) 7.,- 7 f-
*- ?=
t.,. . e t : *- i = I g
)I 3..z
=4 I. }
- n. - -is a. , .
q . I 2 : ,: C3 7; 7I3 3* )';'$Ih h E i3 Z il.
,h' D,.).c-D .'- o h d
= =
R i = ? i i f- i._ l Q .. y :
= it g5 1 y
n, e5 D.w 34u
=4 2 U=a er
- ~3. 'E d
.3e as i 1e ca .1.! w.. a w
o
.e o 13, ,$z-w e..I
- b. It. ; Y.' =.
!. * .s, ., is =, .. a
- i. d. :;: ; . :-
cl z!w. 1 : .a 1 r
- a o
- a. > =
q> .: n> .3 >.E-
- >a 2 a. Z
. ... .*4 l = s 2 .4
- g. !
I?
-3!,"e %. 3 so e a g p p, g 'g~
e . . e
., - = . . . . . _ - . _ _
l[
.. .,o
[AfhEfQF ENGINEERS . . .:. t Wm. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT f t - ]W - t, D.: '
"~
RADIOGRAPHIC REPORT
~
c, e .
~~
k., - REF: KE-4 No.
, .}, ;. h-
.;, ^~ -[._
r ... WELDNO. M [O[ to.. a ..: ..
,. , WRD No. : -:- . .
. , . ' , ig, ' .. ,c-.., 3 .. -.' . . - - - , ..T.
. s t
,, . . REPAIR NO.
5' OESCRIFTION: 1/ M b l - LIN E'NO. 1O .. . ' . SPECIFl
- W. .
TION:
' ~
b N h * [* *
'~ CCEPTANCE CLASS:
. -"" e /F-W PIPE SIZE: E ~ ' ~ ~ I [ '
7j" ,: ,t
' 'r. ~- - . . . .
' WALL THICKNESS: 32, MATERIAL:'
*n
; .- - w .- s : . - , n. . . ..
...' g
}'..,,C'**-
' ~
Cr WELD PROCESS: SMA
-n==>. ig3 -- \/ ' T' GTAW ..,^ ^ "/ T 'l MIG 2 y e- -u -a. , . q . ..:.. --
d, JOINT DESICN: 8ACKING AING -
- ~~ "- * " " ~
INSERT / OPEN
*C- . ".: CURIES:
v + . . . . + . . t~~ ~
*/N 1 v SOURCEf_ ISOTOPE:' . KVP/MA: PHYSICAL SIZ'E:
. - n.1..c .
EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE: . ., SINGLE ' DOUBLEWALL'" a.....4- -..
*' ' ' EUPTICAL
;.p.g
.. . . b . -
4 - -. WALL -
~ '
EXPOSUEk' TIME: SFO: 'iILM/08 JECT INCHES: [W d
~
.Y. PENE ETER: TYPE IlE' UTN N MATERIAL ~
'N PLACEMENT kb D: ' SHIMS:NTERIAL: N ' -""" THICKNESS - MARKER /NO SELT d FILM: 8 NO Z ** A/[ TYPE N SIZE M M37 LOAD '% b y y -
v- - SCREENS:~' FRONT r1 8ACK ' o1 BACKING VIEWIN0 SINGLE 4 i 0008LE DENSITY . 3
- D8 " b*@
~ .
_;' . REMARKS:(SEE REVERSE SIDE) '-. RT.DATE ff--7[ . r
~~
~- r l* /* t9 $ t p vf;ci//
a' '// nuans v,ew / 4$'#~ neu- ^ morn # + / .& $ e~ e + f fv // s* # #r/a /..p /.
& [OS Ie -O O A &
'A Y~ % ~ k W w w ad Cerf' fgb. l Q'37 l -1.4 y A y/
l 21-38E / / bTr-M / d s e 2 ll ~ s ( C i
- n. -
I .. o.v. <a - .om
-rt - . ._.... -..a- o. . .
SxLab- p=
. % .. - s. ; m - .:: a ,. .:. = - -
G; . . '? -fJ9 -
.?6 -
._0.Ol .fi'"
- m. l " ' rC W ?
t: ~ .w . _ t . t. . ..
, , J ' .,
1: K AISEll ENGINEElls. INC. g 7) I I, - o ,8 .', '
- j. . tl:M. IL ZlMMElt NUCLE AH POWEH ETATION FIELD t" ELD NO.
t h ',' . .i .$ f E. . WELD llEr.'OHK / HEPAll! DAT A'S'ilEET HEPAll) NO. 3N l
# '.I .
f , s . / . ', , t, IEEE MtVtetEE 6 tog tog stainuCitoN O fi1EPON'alulLiittEl
; ,,,,-[, -
} r .
co pay g g V1 d 0 W& gg_ yo __l [ $ ~*/_.. 9 $ 0 ']_[lf }g___ yg g ( ga y g l 4 n , flLLEh MAT *l IlEQUlllEMENlS; a i p ELECTHODE p/ COATED - SIZE ' >>L llT# / L.0T 4 Size b' 'llts / LOT # __. WELD'PHOCEDt>HE NO3. /. / 3, [ ._ ', PUHGE HEO.I I PUHGE_% cf tl( Nbil>-1.10llCilPullGE 7 Y cf tl.23 - * .
~
ilEt'OHK INSTitucIl0NS - og 3, g gggogg,,,gg,g,eg. . __6toutuce or orgaarion - . ago. STAur oAit n w ri. 'neuangs er iTeu ss A RASk mAI*L. MtFAln-HtCoHD LOCAllON & EXT ENT. h *.i ' [.J AJAf W YCo . -;, . ,c - uAsonn usnon n 'b-
.li '
l 0 h '/ ,f ,5 r .v M c.s,.s g y
- EnTcu sy
,~gh '*f'Al3 .~ t , s ;If:g' ?\ ,- M..'f'.- JL;,.J m % .' .; ; '3*: 1 b a & $;.g/2 P -
...:s,} i @::a er 6
stre d'4*) set Y}jr} '
- i <?
- 1. - :
L.
..<j)g tps.ree.r &' 5./
Y: '. *l
~@. .D'. : s '!:'. lb- } . .~ ,. .., q ,, .t ; -
(.3,'. _) ,. _ A A.. ffM. ..r.W. . . i6.a. {// H- h,;;2- : ; ., ,.I.',@ ..G yj f'/74
@ itW d 'c'l 5 / on Y l s
~.',.,- _
;a:/2.sh.;k,m.s s i. /. M - .
, -rA :x 'N y
C
}p,ff* ;f..b *4,4A i
.! Ef W. f' h>blifar[d %d >--F
- b. W.f F '.'. - 4 '
.] $.
- r e < ., . i .
wrgl w 1 c . - 3 ,
,>< :c':,
j,:G sy R ;. ' };y % M{Tp+5 ft>N;;(c.g t-idMNhhh 6$f i. e m l"s fh.
$$ S.? ! : :
-e
- % . [
-g --, . . '7.; . , , .y p.,;,g ..; , ,. .,7 .
y,g,,gg o,,, , ggt-
, , - - 6 i
h3
.. v.i, ...
r.. t j pi. Q >;.. .o. .
. . . v.i.
. j. '- 7[,y
, ucc n, . t 6 r'. c '
~2
~
g j. : I . e - e -,. NcE o. ..,m u.1,oou . s !: l AT nEvitw :. __/ /
- s * /_ .d W
' . ,: . ..u m ua,,. ,.4;g
. . ; a.. ~
w ,n.s.u'wk;.,, r:,, ~ya
. v..,:
n sl~ " d. u, ,uu,na,. e r 1,Et,,, s, x,..., s ,. 99 .
?. . ,. - --. .-. . - - . . . . . ..
. - - - - - - = - - - - - - ___--- __
33---______=:-_.- . . - - .
---- - =._. _.
--- ~ ~ -- E=- .'.____. --=-:._ -
- 5 _ _-
___.._....__.-..--...=..__ _ . _ __
.. .. _ ,-z _ _.__ - .__.____-_.:_..=___ _ _
_ - ~ . - - . , -
,_= _-_r ::: _.=_ u. u =_ _=m.
u=.. :: . == m-. --
=:_._- . - -
- _ _ - - - - - - - = = . _=. . . ___--==- _
- .:: ==; - _. =.; y-73 -.= :3- :::= - _-3n ==== r_ _ =_3 - - =- ~--= -= --- _-====:.---__:r=;.~...----.:==_==--_.;..==ga_
rwg - -- w p nygg;;;;;gd'hw. ~,;p.;
..j .J E#.iIrl. d E2:E_T_:1-E-@:El. JJ~'72_. " ,
-=*.e-
_ g g W h. n3,%.,, wA-~ g g g._. 9>Q.~: g%w* K.,.w$Y'** -- - j Q
-. = -- =-- :--
.a---=r==~........_. . _ - .
= ;W~~ === w:-' ._2. .-_s=~=* =
=_= ==- :- ~.: - - --.~=. - - . 4.f* ,
. f.n. .-- . .,+* . o., . 4
& gr . .fgg.de,Q~>hy ~ .,,'.,Q ,. Q &... ?,=9.,f,147W$f'.
M $*_f"h%r . pq ; *: m_;;;WE'QEgg.=;.. t.:f:=.=. : 7-': - _r. =_.R ' ~ ~ . - e .,g
. ,q e 2- g-f;~' . ,, , , - W, vm.yv,~-7. * . ~_;=..~__:_..=.___-..-
_ . ._....-...a--:...-.....=.=~-.
,.-y,g _
,w.r qq;;x- ; w.
._ : =3;v. __.. .. : . =. g.y-==
-.:. ;. ::._. .-+.=.: = : e.== =. - --
-----. -- . _ g - -9Q gu'.ew, my ,,: y-m.st'm.- w. , ;,
_.3,
.~.,w Q_ - :C':7 c .g,,e.g.n.J rm
' D.J.Y
- F D*85s"8
~
E 2.- ". .i a. _ .E -M+2==_d un- r- = == = = - :-T- % D .k'> .TS.MT 3"?-{-";;=a.5E-5s.a;- == ==i= ==r ---
";-y* h ]@'57.[ M D E-% C ""
i,
's NY.b-M['
pi'k
-i WI
. Qh-. M]'].(-}
Ev r
- a
!.MI[
b.F .4~ I-F:~'i! . ~ ~_N.x - = u ==- +..---
. . . . . . . . . _- .:E= _- --- - .; .r=h-4,V f.n -*'-
,e-+ Y- 3. - r .J. e - ::
- %,b.M M ..rhG :s . t.;c-
* , m&
f.2.y[*'Q:'- L 4-*
...z. - .
..____...........-......._-.__...___..___._-....-...-r.u****::
. w
,. *' m .s -
- ~ -.:gl y}# -) , . . 'at t- .=."'k(- -
- p. r_2 en..4'y/., o- oM,.s g$ . , k:.g.
- = -m--
= f "'if-=.' ~-~ ~~~"
~-~ ~ ~ '="q= .14 j;
- f *),*
- s. ,,Q .'L. ~. es. .
-*f- D.t.-2 ~2*E. K*,, x. -- .@~% c *. ' ? 'p. ? ~ q%{. ' 's T , , .
pstrt
.:. =.. . : : v: - _ __ ,.= =: .= _. e-
---------m.. yyo.
.m .,w. t . . . , . - _ :3., : ,, to -
. 4. , ...
.,,4 g_ y .m': 4 : g e., .
-oga r g',.
g p *s.v*:
... . . . ... . . . . . . _ . . - . . .. .-- .- = :: , .,.,
2,, , . ... ,, _-..._.m. ;..-._w.=..=.;_,-
- - u_..m.@ 2 . = r.= ==~:= .;;,.c e
' -QE* y; , ..', , -J'* [, . W ',-~.Qa s [M"~j"C*'. L ' %$
~; ' ' ~ ' = == ===- w-'~= N I*,.re_ Wm. # A ... E -$,.*. b I-' k.s. *.9 [ ",
- r.:
_i_19. . 6.. 5. c_.;.s_-2. : _;is.
-4.m . .:n=u==m==wa+w .:_.=-w=1:.=s u. + aw .a=t
, y ._
' T . k--@
- c. _= nz.v.g..
=.z==:,== .~p.u.:
' =.=.;: == ~_ = 9===
t
-R.;wy sN. -l.,'.M,4,pa.g. Q;,.v .., 4 hgP.'* _. .y ,s y
; u Q. , . ' p*yw, 3 $ %g
*" p 7 ~~ '** %. - Y:,**p
'.Z..:'~'~i.....'m._2._.J..=~_='_=_=__=___M....__..m=..=..",w=...C.~.~.)...
~__.
sQ u '** ) ~ i .. * - .. g j .-
, ,, y 9 u, p,
,3 . d.
s - -,,s. __,, r 5 ;;g::; ..~ :-" -== . ":: ==:: - :: u ;. = = =.- == :. g _ _.u..=. . =.~ '9. r rE"E._r-i =. . _;_=_.2. =_=_=.. . .#. .
'-4..h,4.s_.,-.U.
g ,,.; g _, , %
.:. .S. .'
~* t. ! .
; <. 6. s &Q.. f..' S,, .
s-~
' f. .f-
. W,Q. ',* m.4,.',w*- ,.7
~.'_-- .E. E.. .. .d' . .. . .
.}k . . p[ .', , ;I f Y3;l;i..pf51'i((-Qyri;,-~,-- 3. .iU' J
' f 2 .- 2fh -b f
-r-==.:===._.u........_.c=.---.-=._= w .
, , d. ... ' M.. a> - m [,4 c. 74
-T= ?. . :i'~.~.~::'"i-^i"_M=iKi= == = ==~=w=~= % -'2 ;.=~.:=
W - *A =. % =..y . -y-'.m-c.- . ;Ih.-" .Q$ . .,'"" 'e j A.'g. p - h.d, . W (T. 6,.'*. w ;;
,r'~'- .
---4 .-
s..g.N./ *'. ' 4-
- 2i-Q.. , - NY, V . ye,,&* I"*-%
.'.7_ _~. 7 .'l'".Ffh
- h. p=%.,. _ ' r* ,.
_=U- ?-- ,,r.- _.g . r- .--ev-[. %[.p
' ~_'_ = 2. i-W5.E ce=- .=_ .'.'.'.'.T. l[-'.72.' ~ ~_7.~~.'.~.~Zf.'".
..:u:---------m=;=.=.=-.=-.w%- .
'5'-
? h ;,,k~*t.\Wl d~.' ?)g
===7'.f~c . /*qRT1Q- *:f- '.-S~ ~m--.,@
..--n__.. --+
_ .E = = ;9 =:._ '--- .;.i
;- ;;;-~~ ' ; ~_ 7_- . __- u =-._ ---L___. ; .p.. .,...
- .}Q- h [ t ~.f
.=. Wt_ =.M=_.M__ _ .15M. TM . _ _?__~ :~~ 7.-~._"_.nf :% WG. C.
.=...E =
._:.__._......._.___.b._._.,,.,.
_:.T_ __~_
. %4 4.r.". ,
.-. g P-s N .'i't'p .b r' . . f ** I \
(Q. V,_.%. L .; .. 'p". .
- m.
&, ip _ _[ - :TB [G
.,. .: p._
U.,4y*) b; L:.e'.'N. '._.51*;Q.:",'A . ,-%.
,,0,-
..--"=;.___._r_==._=._. . _ _.
?_}. .. . = :. - 7_ . ---___ - = - - = . _ _ _ _ g3 ** Q ,g,r, g.h,'2-[ ( %- Q fr' f ,p'Q,, g;gpQ.g g.g.-g' y g
'[.F*h*
--3_..-. . _ - - . - . _ _ . ._.-_ - ,: . y _ '"; 3
[
= :
y w., m .c L. y s,2"3..s m m, y..,_.
- v. .
- --ay;s,. _ w...m-- e
. w. .-~.g g, 2. ~. m. .:.:*y y ., q m.% m . - , L ..aM. ,J. c .s.Nk gr ,% 4r;,m.
a s.. . . , u,4. ..-,.p.s. y 3 h .g
=2.=-=_...__--=:-- ____. _ ;: g.,,s
, u C",)q:hg L gss. p A).- T i a.T-. m .
=r c.f. g i
m,-
-. _ _ _ _. .r _ =+p q , ,y. f~yI- 2i, 1,g3 .% ;.(=-......._.._..-==__-:-- ch,gsg .
aam_
.. ,=..____.... .. =, =r- __
f p g g,-=J. ,ucm b w y Q.qrt".Q N. W'A. %. yn
,t.
I
..E,: EX:3. m _.g=J.3a=== y -
Z g .-3-3 .p.Wh ~w_4.gp- p. g
- _ = - . _ . . _ _ ______ ._. = .= M.g.-;,A3%mmQ.g:,. h..*9. , . Q n. w
.==n .e- - y pn.%
====-.__._.=-- -
. m . . , -
'dhy
.%wWW.b & " 7,. 9m+ ' m u.%p .edt~a' .. _ r.yr..
.-F _ _mrc==.==- -- --=- --_ Q.--<.-W 5
- :.::._ _=.==.=r: r Wgg.:- p 'W "e [*ecE-;.A(m,%. wQ- p r #p.a-E =E .
__=-=._.__._._....__
. .= .r.-- _. . _ _ . _ _ _
.__+ %.*.d.m&.s:,.y;a-Wh z , :-v q %+ #tii q,., . ;. .g C
. v .. w Wi.CL .;;z.;;':3., W Y I 'i Q Q '" Q : . y . g. :. '?.'C $>.--U; h~. : U- p~. y-, -- Ed,gs
.955h .: .. _L :: ^2='~ -__ - __ - 2 y :w a-w. c.:5 v' -
? n .r.=._ _=- - I ==m---
===-- - = -
---- =$.~%TTM=m.4,.g-y.w.g mn E - 3g e-R;y:r.v[ -v.. L g ,,N'1 ,
.,.g p A y ., m A
=-=-r____ m-. 4 cy 5 = r ---- ---
riWdI. ;:WMFi$,.e M s. h, s P'kk EigtM C i
.d4 m -=
m"hn.s.,. y .:.%<r m m e.. %w: wu.g ~
. 4 m,,=w:. at, M.- .
- w. m, . f. Q .M.- a.w. .- m ,We l - - .--. _ . 3 ; 2
- _-._ _~
;3y._2 Kg'Q-M*
- y. , . . Y %n .5 gG.g Q Q Gt M. 'Q' td?
=_. -.ZX9Et-ME&If}%Eh.WGW 44:1f f~~ Q&fjhQ
== - _
==
- t _Pm_ m % .
u tmo.- mw@r p $n$, y.J &52Mrrag u
.p,g~ u~Q. 'ws~ .,i ~'
&' ~ %
I .c=w = - --- . m*T-
,r a f
. ::n~n;,,NgtMW m .a. g9n,.a _. r-o> ,yG. m9W h.,;
,=.:=- ,, g., % 7,q; r ,, a. M y.'-]e.y y ,y.,:a g ._ = y-r
= _- - -
Q q *4 - g -
. _w..
A.g., gg q w~g ;g g
._ _ g
=== m ,j . -
., e m.
s- g,[g ^g.,1eM -qp59qf,n9.n.3 a _ = ===-- == = = ,m./ y' .
~
--- ~
-.- .. . m-g. . n .,,
_ - G.~y,3r=,.2QtM
"' ^ -
g3g. _ ... X ~iy.*> &. e .~~ ,b.g 9.:.:
- -- = = . . . _ = . - = . - - - - -
=_=_-
- -- .- . .. py,.;' n
=n. . . -
= = = _ _ _
__ _ . = = = = = =
- - _ . . - - - . . - - - . ___ =__=- __ _
==_ : -
. . _ . . . . _ _ ..- .__ ~ ~ ~ ' ~
-- --;-' --~'-~
.. . :_.=~; r I C=i cili';.T' _.
- .=-- _-
;':= ~'-'-- - - ~ ~-- . _. _ -
~ ~ ~ '--
- - r ~~ #--.-~~_~.J.Z~~---~-~~ _
~ 3. 5-O =. - . J . '.=i c~.~.':-- 2 3. 2-i ::_-Z
= =~~--' -i' ~:': .'2 - =r" = ==
-l'? 5:.b1 =:.2==%...:5N5'_^ .". ~ :^~=- ~ ~~~ -_. .';-.. .~. _= = ; =~'= -__ _ - . _ -~ - ' ' - - - ' ~ ~ ' ~ - - - . . -
g_.._._- _...__.=z_._ .
, .-=- . - . . -_. -. - . . . - .
- *%* & PENETRANT INSPECTION REPORT i
r
-)-bM hMGNAFLLfX
~M WILLIAM H. ZD4MER POWER PLANT t.
PENETRANT PROCEDURE NUMBER ACCEPTANCE CLASS ASME III f .' TECHNIQUE RECORD SPECIrICATION SPPM 4. 2,R J N[ ., , ME w MW
. CLIENT lbHCSA GM6"
/N C .
- y DESCRIPTION C.- V -
MATERIAL 4[f ! SURFACE CONDITION (~-8va#3.
. , -[f WELD IS IPE i~ PLATE VALVE FITTING OTHER v-:. .
-=
iJ.'--
- PR E- CLEAN:- -
g*W MATERIAL - SKC-NF - METHOD - SPRAY & WIPE DRYING TIME-5 MIN.
- y. PENETRANT: -
f ~.'. . MATERIAL - SKL-HF APPLICATION - BRUSH DWELL TDviE-10 MIN. PENETRANT REMOVAL: MATERIAL - SKC-NF METHOD WIPE DRYING TIME-5 MIN.(MAX. ) DEVELOPER: MATERIAL - SKD-NF APPLICATION - SPRAY DEVELOPING TIME-7 MIN. POST CLEANING: MATERIAL - SKC-NF METHOD - SPRAY & WIPE Item View /G rid Not Id entification Number Accent Acc e et R ema rks l C v' 3 7 T- Y /,o d l' / l lG Rouxs o u-t R 4 M J' l' I I l . I l l l l l .. l
Inspec:ea by b
. q.!. .
OM ..- Date 7-/F.74
. d, c:' . - .
j%
*. .~
~
j 4 .
.s ,n
~ L .'. .
tu. al. ZsMMEli NUCLE Ail POWEll SIAIION FIELDCELD NO. U U'D- __ N? ,. '".0340 , weto aEw0HK / aerain o*TA siseeT nEP^in No. 2'S ists ctvtpse 6:06 eon iussaucison o nksfoNW8411lL&) ,
,g j.j YO T 'OFS O/V0E A I WG. No h II ~ 'N '~l = Cl l Alb MK1 $ 1 f
FIL L Eli MAT't.. ft EQUlitEMENTS: -/ . If .
.[
ELECTI 0DE (tsAllEIC0ATED , SIZE
~
/ 2- ills / LOT # sl2E M llid/ LOT # WELD PHOCEDUHE nod [M 8, //( . '-lY a -
I e. : Pult0E ItEQ.1 }.p. PURQg _ )( CFH. g hh0RCH PURGE , __CFH._2.3-/b ' h ' hi ilEWOHK INSTituCTIONS ~ 4 - ,
- T 'i o$
4 Ihtto ntrain suticn. ir ucu ss 4 umse aan.narain-necono tocatiou a exitur. i b '.'E\#'[ h h i
'1r e eei scoutsce or orenanon n o. 6raur aan u i ci. uuaus -
umson l usuonD ' N bbY
- 6) se o d't*1/ ^" Itlh) .
; li.it ".
z;pe,,c,/,ff.) wp SKETCH SY
-e - y tir pat p " , ,:u. .
t 4 e+4/N o N /24, s
,1 ppg t Q.
^$L --'$t* d ay)rpu,dW,
~
~
$@%wie J' Ws,%_,.'s?.)~;, ev-iql; L', :,,,: ': ,
- '., y.~ . ; '; ....; ,fI D kfh/A%'h : hl .
~
i c.a
.,.i n i ' ' i ,.- ' I,% .
,.'t.
an L en s u
-'ffWy*f.o.W('(U- .,..
- .'l.: V. ld W
a n >in cin4ig q ' '; "O <~
'^
l.
"I Nkh ' 'M ~ tlM k, .,hTf.h N i' '
G pmQ a c =(
. . .n 2
,. . .s
. , t ' .. :. ..
hh1./ !/k (sr./.,kI 61 r.
'3.
u.e I
. . ,, '.; if
, J: a?
- '. ... a .'
a!6 e'.,,,f(,, I,
- - e .
i i c.
.) ( i,:> k. .g.,,yi,,b, ..y ;pJ.e . I '. . . , U,
.;,e ] t. j,y,
....w. -
i
- 7. i<
. .. ; . .y .. , .
.g :f .c . s lE, 6.'. I. .,. , ,: f, ;- k l. E;'. .',, ~ i. ' [ .' );:. {.i j-},, h
- O '. l[. f. f {f4 f, {,,
,' { "' - ]
.l
- ; .[,k$h
.< 3 , .
~ff- ,.
e artuuce oniciuu n i rona a e . . /. . x {l
. . t. . .
,g
; .,. [:' ' / ...i
.(. ., . / ~A Tuvne "Mk.
tAPfft9 VATS ,, g _ft.W [ X..,/n,ij
--*=-
la' .I TU.', .
'@) ,
..c 'i ;p:3,M.l
- g. '
u- /Q/ p.r. ). d.e , - i 9 -r
.0 y f.+ ;.9:1 Mliu
- a. ~. , .. . ,. -
' ;) lr..c; 3*:7 ~'intoiwan or suon, / . ..e ,pf,f
' : ..e. ..r * ~ -d. a L
- cpiTsGdoTdsYdo'a-~?' V
i m .-- - . . .
. ....m.
- . ~
, ~ , . . [ M / S E R .., .
._ , Wm.H. ZIMMER NUCt. EAR POWER STATION - UNIT /1 *
. ENGINEERS . '
RA080 GRAPHIC REPORT
=~ -
* ~~
' i'[- .~.
- . .i. [ .
WELD NO* REF:. KE-l No.
.- =- . E': M .,:..g.... f . ;-q:; .. ,
/
,, g, W;-, RC No.
-~
' * - ; , . . ',. 'g. "-{.Z- ..
r,- j. - ,/. . . . REPAIR NO. 07 RIFTION:
; LINE NO. V A1 b/d SPEhlFICATION:*' ' % 8 M '- d */ Nf ACCEPTANCE.C :
' I
MM M _ # N :. ..s r' ' PtPE SIZE:. ;./[ u rv: .e a. . r..
- M4^ WALL THICKNESS:
MATERIAL:
"^ - '
~ ~ GTAW" V MIG
~ ~~
^ '~
'," WELD Pfl0 CESS: SES " -
~ ~#
b JO DESIGN: fl CX NG RING
~
INSERT OPEN - . t, S. $0 CE: 130TO E:n F CURIES: ~~ NO" --- - KhP/MA: Y"~ PHYSICAL SIZE: *l *f E- EllPTICAL
'~
EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE: SINGLE WALi. *
- ~ 00U8LE WALLM?
EdPOSURE TIME: '9 3 h ~ SFDr 9 ' FILM /08JEETINCHES: 7 'C PENETRAMETER: TYPE / SIZE
- A3'IN N /h MATERIAL I/d PLACEMENT f/b u l
=
THICKNESS MARKER /NO SELT 8 CHIMS: MATERIAL: FILM: 8 RAND bbN TYPE . SIZE y
/1M
,s-Y I 7 LOAD --
'b [
. .. .y ~
~
- pf SACK L"f1 SACKING SCREENS: FRONT VIEWING SINGLE A[ 0008LE DENSITY 9-8
- RT.DATE
~~
"' 2 REMARK 3: (SEE REVERSE S10El T h$ N 4- ?
=
C)/[od gi o-/t
~///h h~k'9?$kk X '
h' ~ X Iffl&lS~ E nm q f v 410'37 , .. 5 o 2
.O
( i 1 *R*
- I d .
.n ~ ~ - - -.. 'L .
; 4% .- -
o.. un. 4
..o.- 4-= a =
fu & .v $. g.zu M:- - ~ ~ Q * ,, ;. y, ~~ ni. = ...-; w a.3-i R ..
--e- y.297g m,
.. . . m . ,. y .. ._..3-Q r- .= mB... 7p&.+>=. . _
~' "
m -:--q - . - - . _ . _ .
(-, .. . ._. ,
-- -- ~-~ -- - . . _ . - - ---- - = .
-e_ -..~._-.;;.,._:.:-
. , _ ~._
_ - -. . ..--. y; . _
- . ~~~--
~
_.___..L. --
'Y
- ._ - -- ""~~. _:: _ _: .:.=. . ..- .:.:=-= :_
. ~ =. ._---- - - - -
- - "~-...----"- .
- ~ ~ ' -" ~ - - _ - . - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ' - : ;L -~ ;
. __-_.s =:*-::-.,:.._._...==*~
. . , . _ _- ***"~"=--'-----' '
- _% .. T _ _ -~~-.:;.----
%_ .j 4= * ~gi: .":.-' - '- ' ~ ' - :.- = ::( :* '- ' - - - _ . - - . . .
- =: ,=: __ .- - - _- =T!:f. -?i=.=. ::. ..=_ ~ ~.._::...=_ ~~
-===:
m n<-- f f-f._:_ ._ w.-.- p)'Q'~.g*N*ZmQQ.f;-fMlv'}.QMk-5&. w__.v m_ _ _,., e-- ~C . .,. -~.r ~ v. % _n ~i...9[.w.-
~ ,2i;f.;,i
- _.__.==..._._===__=.___.._..:. ,. _
w -- . s ..,._ p _ qg-g g
*g
_ _= =3=.;: :3- . .-=- a_f%L _ , s, , _- .. . - .; m ._ .
=== =, g === gn.$&.q;;,r-/.ME'h. . . i. -h*P M
.,,"..,,.a-..-
p ~,. . .2n.;G>d' . f ..
--==;.===._.:=:.
_ . _ . . g. ..=..~....;_.=__..__._..=...- . m ~ .3". e 3 4, s .,, w.u,.s. 4.us : s.m,-%.;;q
..- ,;- m . . - . s-J3 u-}~.*-a
; u. ag .. , :-: .:~,=.,g ,. . . n .w ,g ..
.s. .~: ...m
-_..:.--=.,...._....._..._..._.........f_g..~.
,W;g
**-=
- .' , * *=
a r.ym- :1su-J.,+ ,--.' g'Y,w# 7,
*a d4-
- e '*7
. _ _ . _ _ . _ . . ..=_---=.;ax----~-. . . . ..
....e-** .. ,4e +% . '. e..som.=<.
-as.=
u..'e
-kw... .s :
~
_= a , .-.=. . .==.:5_ = :==:. == : .:::.::.=.= =";."'. 5 &g*.f. .[*Q[**: Y es:; F L
- O*' . .'" r.: yC., .
~
. ;.{ : .. ? cm w -- .== =..=-w= g._ :- ..:.= _ =,m.. . -..w q.f.fW*n i- y, p -1.-' :.r .G m L.T y -.. q t-: ". . \., u. -a.m.
; - t . .
_===....._._.
.. ____... _.., u_W. . % CLvp...:.-
_ . . _ . . . . . . .. .- . ~ - E z.. o. e ..
; N~' * - g- .-. - .- N'. . .L l ,~-
- i. ' ~?
~
- 'Y'. %- -:& ' %.YA N ~ T . A '& r.f -
- lEm . ,.
- .ii==~* ~ ;-w .
?-r; p *t
. _ _ _ . ___ == . _ ":.. _ . . . . .
-.._.. 2.wi==
.. = ==.= - 5Q.... W ;.u
....._...._ .? r ..,y ......... g e. ... .
. - Q ,-
,- . .; , es, r.
=-: -- --. _ _ . . . _,3Q . =:: . : :f , -- --- .: =.2--[ . * - -
. .. Q . _.,i. f ..,,p.,
.g';.$:. .w. ., . ' ,*
,. *. .Q q
-:.: : ::- - - ._.v ;. n. - ==35.-_z:3;.y. .:::.-:=:. .:.= 3_L;n ._ , ,
n.. . .. ..+,:,,.- . ..
.. .. ,.. , ~
. . :a.o .
s1y .-r,
. =: - ,:_:: - --- - 3_ - . - .
,,,,, . ,a_.. .. , .~_
.__; z - - - ,.;;_;;_a;g = =:-
, _ _3_ ,. .. ..
G_.=C ~ '2E;_~ii =iiiiF=ii;r = 2;= :Vr=< === =J. .*%.. ..-
*. *. , 5
_=_== === :.=:5.fiE=;_Qi.-.=.a =y=== q:.~;3g '*$ . ' . *., Q-
~
- 4
- . -- -- =--g2=C.".=== =i.=. .:.W. =_ z::=x ::..: _;;:::.::: G _,. t .'.f"' ,
*~,._ , . _
s *.,,,
.-{.;.'.:.'~~'---.-=' .E .* 'Q'*' _ :.,..;_f T"::. :: ;,- :::::::: .:l = ,
. -~ f , ,
- .==u;_ .:=.=:. :: --- - ===.: _= = ;-- 7 z , *
$_',' ?.
~
'hb'-b **?"* ' *'
- e * * * - ? ^'
* ,?
, y
** ::.'.~. :.N-!b',.; - b'-
- ."'-". _~:;-*~::L.
.5N ~.'.?~-5.
..~...._
......_.3.....-.;3...,.-l..$.9..
_. .; : 1-* M: :.*J.g,- ,]-*A _i * '7 ( ,G 3 12. , ,
.".;;.5-*.g.f.* _ , . , , , ,
. . . ~ ~
.:. , ,*"'~
. . -- O' ';:~.~ (e- . , , .. - .
7 :n e TE=:b+& a '+. -. . .
^
s ' ' - * **
+. _==_ . -===
' ... __. __~-_l=_i%i: _. .'.;.. _=-. '.=. . . ....,.=. . _::
,... ,. _ .. .l._.. ==._ .
== : . ....)_ $-~* ..;T,**'t"%"../**.-
g . . . g . w,
=
.y ,
.,' Y. . y-
^_~~_-'5:5.'~.~
~
i nr e h I .p .*
*** 'i g,,,
* *t *. ' * * -*
..;---~'.....l~.,1 .;_m j ,' ,'
>=* * * ;8 - -
=.-.._h_._._.__..._..._.=.--.:...._,,,_...._....9pZ"
- ..__.,; .. . C'. ;* "" *"'m"1 "-..L._, , . , - .
,,,,. > . 7 =. ,
g '
. _ . . _ . ._......._::=-..__._._.__.._...-=~ --
_. __ _- . ::.::a:= .. . , i' = M ;,, .=g, "_'m.V.
--w =.2A *
**r.s. r.
-. e~ ~.
'4~ . , . ; p 5 o . ~ k . H.-
- e. -1
- V:****Q f_T
.'{',.- .~bf h'.V M" f,s. ;;*
i . L ", p (, 3.~5 ;_-- - - .-~;W-i: ,---- .j - . ...__ 2Ei
- 4. ,. g( g \g)? J. 3
. _ _.g.____.. _ _ . _ . _ _; gt-c.pg.g-- g _
- g. 4. ...g : ..._ .9 ,
.se.-.
- w. . -. .c m
= 1g/' =a<;"ry
. .~ ~. ., .
.7.t w .u,g
. _-... Tem. ,. p1
- . ,%. >=* s, f ... . s.Is.~
p .g. * ..
.---.:::...__ -e..
g C _%*gj u.. t-- . .
.: ** y G. w
- - - - ', :yQJgu, .[g s.%.:
-~~ - L ..
- Q-- e, * *,,,,, ,m 7
_.;=.=___._.._-.__._.-__...._...._.1=E.m:h----._-n-%-e.e-
~ - - -
s- s-une x-> m r
- ; .-t r-
.-' .- b.. .-
- : r 6 ~ 6. % a. . . . 7.
._ g--.y_w-rwa.u X-2% - Q, L q D. W* .N H,_. t?TA ~s:- . .T
_____.__.,...__==.=,-.=__=-
- - %. ,.s
-- :- . ::: -- _: - _. .. m.;r.~: y . *Y -mr,:A ?. Q C + - .
. - .W.. :
, ,~%.-.. .
xlf.. . .u= ~ . r .:- ...%a ?f;
.. > .z ...'.~. W. m . ' , Z. 3 '~. D -k".'. W
.= _ l %V' '~. , .@-
~ - - -:___..
-==.._.-- . __. _ . _ . -- .y% . . .
... .. .n;* % e 'g q.- ,
b ,4 <
. _ . _ _ _ . ---=:=___r:-_:_._.___
_q ,' O. 5'*='* D -% ~f'.'I T W 80'
'. , , . p. I . . ,k'.m S O, '
t.. [, p, g,
, A-. ' , 1(-M. .! .* ,= ..
g
-,.,. )#M..
g, . , ,g _j ,-
. gg._g., gg ., ,, .,
p, C..*, p. -*4 -
'"q. -- @. .q ---rn. _ __ _. ....__ :2. __. - ._____..r:-- g; ? -. w'.' g cfe _p ...n.
i.
- - - - - - - _ - - -_._._..;_. g g,Q:;.,m:. y: , q pA g- . .,Q_p, g,agf%. L. p 7;:2Q .9,,3g.g,. g
._. - ,; ,,,q.; y4g. ,
,, G ;
r = = _ = = = - . ._r...== .:==p+, g~TT M agg.n3yf. y3; g .N-r. ' MM .' a
- ~w J.-
A V Q. ;M?.* r s .=.,-- i,.- l'. _ _ _ _ = _ . _ _. _ _ _ _ _ . . ..._
---u..= w - ,,:.
_ -. _ . _ _ . . . . _ . _ . _ . . ... -, g,.
. .a g~- W- Ww-.=. -
w r-Q .m m Q. 4
". a,9.7 . . *nen r. -? [*; ( .
L - al- ..fi .. *-4 > s (4. C r-
@.,g. g p...
m * *; 3,
.f,,
L-p r; l
- ._.=_____.__ _ =w _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ gg.;-ggge.:. ; I. ) y , .; y g f g , 4@.-g w
.,.,c-b
, ...._., . =w %.. w_-_;
e _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . . _= . . 4 . f. m_ g._x.f g. ze. y u m . .p = %. -n,..,w.. g .wm.., - y .g. y y a p . a,g .s .4 ;. %s X.,b..Q.c_ gg;j ., - a :,. I-
.__.2.._.. a .
;_._ _ . . __._ - - - - - =- -- ; ; _ z t.----
p;:, ,_7 ,p . i ,, _ ,, , , . 4 W g., y,E , N f* I"
%- awe
~~_ Q *b I-
- w,s m. w, . %e ,.
C
, > ** wlw.M COr
='._.yF*-
*s" =* .,,. -'
** . b:P*.,
_ .g[p.,r g3 =J.** 4.- n p ,J .m , & " f" C.; ,,. {-9' sy;N, m
$Y,?Y-
- - - - - f .,
Y
~'-
s - ( ~ O
~-Q< &,5r.w .
t W s.,,
=, -4.* 5n W,,4 .
- 2. s g,;Tt a- 72 d.o_%s ea. -
1a.
,g-
- w. y
- m. .w'Yh.w's
,f,. ,.,g-@y-~._.s*.e, .:
g? 1 .&g r- ) '" m*J -
. ,, . n w y ,=,f -
an. .- c,,. . ,y . ap .r, y~J. at,p, .,,. 2' im--.. J I _,[. . .[.. m y:n O-. *=.r r a .
.'hm - ._7'..*m -te M ..,.w.q~ a.g g pW . n
.p,
;__ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ . __.______;.,. g . .
gg , W. '".-i";s-8.*')
..q. e ' g -% 7J7-
.. . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . . . . _ fe y g ig@Np."M ,p -f h [(Kev' g - ,tn I.h -- -
2-- f.*$& j g *>- h 5%h 5 Y*Y * %"- s'e ' ^ '.g. .r. . *_'*WM
~~.~.~~~~ X.,~.~.1~'.'., d 9 W. CeV *T,%. _sT-
___.- _ _ . . _ . . . . _ . ' _ . . ._ a9 4>*,
^
- _ . . . . _ . _ . _. , f,, . *'s ** f. $es* . _. eD.~ s
%,. tb. . .c% 'M_ ~*'
%* w=a m se-s' ._,. Q _ *
'- Wd4 -
._.... _. - _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ _ . . ..___.___...__.._._..!Pg . _ ps
-ry y ,,A. g. ?"*'.W,r. .pnE .
.m':r3. , g. . $2 -~ f .a.,= f.
.g .f7..;;". a .
.~,~, A eC ... .ar-- v:
4 J
- an . . .
M. . . W *-
.m r% 2.% %' 2P'L.%& g
. m .
r __-. - - -;_._-__. _- _ _._ ___ .. . _ \ "~*'--C;e -^' . wy. z w c. r y"**bw-
^'*'*
._ ~~~ " i=$+.x. .
=.-._-.-
, . ..--=-__-==._.--:=_.- - - - - _ . - _ - . _ . . . . . _ - - - - - - - - - - - -
;=._-------.:.:._=_:=_::.---.-------.-=.~------- - - - - - ^ .}}