ML20049J270
| ML20049J270 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1982 |
| From: | Clark R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Fay C WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8203120358 | |
| Download: ML20049J270 (7) | |
Text
_
1 i
q
()f5DjQ FEB 2 61982 Docket tios. 50-266 O M' and 50-301
//
'Y,,
/ ~
Q f ?)
M o
- en g,
p_
a h k,y
- h. '[8
- p@2x O Mr. C. W. Fay Assistant Vice President M
f
- <a /C Wisconsin Electric Power Company 4>
f9 231 West Michigan Street gV'r Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 P
Dear Mr. Fay:
The flRC staff has initiated a substantial effort to bring current its approvals of inservice inspection relief requests. The purpose of this letter is to ensure that the information we are supplying to our contractors for review is current and reflects the latests requirements for your facility.
I l
For Point Beach Units 1 and 2 our review will include your previous submittals and responses as listed in Enclosure 1.
Any earlier submittals on the subject of the ISI Program will be considered obsolete.
Based on submittals, the proposed inspection intervals for these units are:
I Unit 1, 10/77 to 12/81 and Unit 2, 6/79 to 9/82. We will be conducting the review against the requirements of the 1974 edition of Section XI of the ASME Code up to and including the Summer 1975 Addenda for Unit 1 and the l
1977 edition of Section XI of the ASME Code up to and including the Summer 1978 Addenda for Unit 2.
Please determine if there are any additional previous submittals that we should be reviewing. Likewise, if there are any additional requests for relief that should be considered for'the proposed inspection intervals, l
please submit these requests within thirty days.
l
!!ote that such requests should deal with only the inservice inspection of pressure-bearing components including supports and with the system pressure tests. The inservice testing of pumps and valves is being treated separately and you will receive information regarding it by separate correspondence.
Your requests should include both exempted components under the terms of the code as well.as relief from the requirements of the code in accordance with paragraph g of 10 CFR 50.55a.- Also please advise when you are using later code versions than the previously mentioned Addenda (per Item (g)(4)(iv) of 10 CFR 50.55a) for certain examinations, particularly how you are meeting "all related requirements" from the same version..
i OFFICE)
........ a n = a a n. ~ a a..aaaaa.~.
- a. a. a * * * *.aa.a aa.aaaaaaaa"
- """a"""""".
1 F
SURNA7Eh
...................a
..............a....a.
a a ~~.aa..aa a a 8203120358 820226
....................a..
05000260
! wnc.PDR ADOCK O
PDR JFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom m-mm
. Because your previous submittals generally seem to follow the appropriate guidelines, we are procedding with the review.
Early in that teview, we may bhscontacting you for additional information. To expedite the review, please advise your assigned project manager verbally as soon as possible (within 10 days) as to previous submittals we should be reviewing or other requests for relief that are forthcoming.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely.
Odniral signed by n5;eA. Clark Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reacto-s Branch #3 Division of 1.icensing Enclosure DISIRIBUTION:
~'
As stated CDocket Fi1B NRTjiDI cc: w/ enclosure Local PDR See next page ORB #3 Rdg.
D. Eisenhut J. Heltemes, AE0D PMKreutzer T. Colburn OELD I&E NSIC ACRS (10) i l
l l
l
\\
omca>..g.gsg.g..
9.y
- g..._
g.....
l sunnut >
..D...Q(A,N.E.Y..
.2.............
2/>4/82
/82
. 2/.#7/82....
//(, /82 l
l our>
l nne ronu m oow ancu ono -
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam mi-mm
p*Woog
- E(
- j UNITED STATES 1
g c(
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%fC4/
FEB 2 61982
~
Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301 s
Mr. C. W. Fay Assistant Vice President Wisconsin Electric Power Company 231 West Michigan Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201
Dear Mr. Fay:
The NRC staff has initiated.a substantial effort to bring current its approvals of inservice inspection. relief requests. The purpose of this letter is to ensure that the information we are supplying to our contractors for review is current and reflects the latest requirements for your facility.
For Point Beach Units 1 and 2 our review will include your previous submittals and responses as listed in Enclosure 1.
Any earlier submittals on the subject of the ISI Program will be considered obsolete.
Based on submittals, the proposed inspection intervals for these units are:
Unit 1, 10/77 t'o 12/81 and Unit 2, 5/79 to 9/S2. We wil_1 be conducting the review against the requirements of the 1974 edition of Section XI of the ASME Code up to and including the Summer 1975 Addenda for Unit 1 and the 1977 edition of Section XI of the ASME Code up to and including the Summer 1978 Addenda for Unit 2.
Please determine if there are any additional previous submittals that we should be reviewing. Likewise, if there are any additional requests for relief that should be consicered for the proposed inspection intervals, please submit these requests within thirty days.
' Note that such requests should deal with only the inservice inspection of pressure-bearing components including supports and with the system pressure tests, The inservice testing of pumps and valves is being treated separately and you will receive information regarding it by separate correspondence.
Your requests should include both exempted components under the terms of the code as well as relief from the requirements of the code-in accordance with paragraph g of 10 CFR 50.55a. Also please advise when you are using later code versions than the previously mentioned Addenda (per Item (g)(4)(iv) of 10 CFR 50.55a) for certain examinations, particularly how you are meeting "all related requirements" from the same version.
2-
=
~
Because your previous submittals generally sfem to follow the' appropriate guidelines, we are proceeding with the review.
Early in that review, we may be contacting you for additional information. To expedite the review, please advise your assigned project manager verbally as soon as poss.ible (within 10 days) as to previous submittals we should be reviewing or other requests for relief that are forthcoming.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is n:t required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing Enclosure As stated cc: w/ enclosure See next page O
o 9
8 4
9 e
v e
2 W1sconsin Electric Power Company cc:
Mr. Bruce Churchill, Esquire Mr. William Guldemand Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge USNRC Resident Inspectors Office 1800 M Street, N. W.
6612 Nuclear Road Washington, D. C.
20036 Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Joseph Mann Library 1516 Sixteenth Street Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Mr. Clenn A. Reed, Manager Nuclear Operations Wisconsin Electric Power Company Point Beach Nuclear Plant 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Mr. Gordon Blaha Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks Route 3 Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241 Ms. Kathleen M. Falk General Counsel Wisconsin's Environmental Decade 114 N. Carroll Street Madison, Wisconsin 53703 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Activities Branch Region V Office ATTN: Regional Radiation Representative 230 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Chai rman Public Service Comnission of Wisconsin Hills Farms State Office Building Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III Office of Executive Director for Operations 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
1 REVIEW DOCUMEt4T RECORD Unit (s) Point Beach Units 1 and 2 Ta s k A Date Type Subject Matter 4/26/76 Lear (NRC) to Burstein(WE)
Guid Guidance, Units 1 & 2
/
6/02/76 Burstein(WE) to Rusche(NRC)
Sub Will use code case 1698(incorp. in 1974 Code) for ISI
/
11/22/76 Lear (NRC) to Burstein(WE)
Guid Goidance, Units 1 & 2
/
2/17/77 Burstein(WE) to Rusche(NRC)
Sub'n Tech Spec Change No.42, Unit I for ISI
/
Revised ISI Program - to sununer.75 code, for period
~
S/20/7/
Bursteln(WE) to Case (NRC)
Subm beginning 10/21/77, Unit 1
/
II/03/77 Lear (NRC) to Burstein(WE)
RAI RAI on Unit i 5/20/77 ISI plan and relief rennest
/
8/26/77 Lear (NRC) to Burstein(WE)
Ltr Grants interim relief to Unit I based on S/20/77 plan
/
10/06/77 Burstein(WE) to Lear (NRC)
Subm Response to 8/3/77 RAI-Unit 1
/
/
7/12/78 Schwencer(NRC) to Burstein(WE)
RAI Additional RAI on S/20/77 Plan and 10/06/77 response, Unit 1 Tech Spec. Cliange flo.58,. Unit 2 for ISI - Same as Tscil.42-/
l 11/27/78 Burstein(WE)'to Denton(NRC)
Subm linit 1 (sununer 75 Co/ 3 12/04/78 Schwencer(NPC),to Burstein(WE)
RAI Additional RAI on S/20/77 Plan, Unit 1
/
~
, Response to MTof T2721777~(iloesn'.t mention 77T2778 RAI or..
12/06/79 Burstein(WE) to Schwencer(NRC)
Resp any, response), Unit 1
/
2/26/79 Bursteln(WE) to Denton(NRC)
Subm ISI Plan.for Unit' 2, summer 75 code, interval begins 6/1/79/
S/31/79 Noonan(NRC) to Schwencer(NRC)
Memo RAI for Unit 2 for 1979-1982 period
/
RAI on U5TIZ, RequesITor Unit I and 2 ISI pro 9 rams and
/
10/04/79 Schwencer(NRC) to Burstein(WE)
_submillit]s_to be combined-S/24/79 Taylor (PNL) to Cheng(HRC)
RAI RAI on Unit 2
/
4
~
Task A REVIEW DOCUMEllT RECORD Unit (s) Point Beach Units 1 & 2 (Cont.)
Date Type Subject Matter 12/04/79 Fay (UE) to Denton(NRC)
Subm Response to 10/4/79 RAI on Unit 2 refers to Unit 1
/
I/30/80 Taylor (PNL) to Johnson (NRC)
Ltr Addillonal questions on WE's response to RAl's on Units 152/
Fitgls responses to RAI inadequate, forwards additic 31 3/04/80 floonan(NRC) to Schwencer(flRC)
Memo Juestions for 3/S-6/80 Meetinq
/
ISI Meeting at which.151 remainino problems were to be 2/26/80_ Ia_ylor(Plil I to Jolul10n(fjRC)
Mtg discussed ($/26/80 topics; 3/12/80 notes from mootinn)
/
flotes plans to inspect coolait_!nnun_1 fell!1_to 79 code addendu{
t 10/06/81 Fay (WE) to Denton(ilRC)
Subm
!!otifies llRC plans to submit 2nd 10-year ISI Plans for Units 10/06/81 Fay (UE) to Denton(flRC)
Subm 1&2 6/82 & 9/fl2 response
/
10/21/111 r:olburn(HRC) to Burstein(WE)
Ltr floti fies NRC sta f f find bolb 10/6LaLproposals acceptable
/
S e
e 1
l l
-