ML20049A637
| ML20049A637 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System, Satsop |
| Issue date: | 09/23/1981 |
| From: | WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010J392 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8109300445 | |
| Download: ML20049A637 (16) | |
Text
.
si q
5 INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW giu PROGRAM 1
FOR WNP-1/I4 & WNP-3/5 SUPPLY SYSTEM IIEETING wiTH NRC AUGUST 20, 1981 BETilESDA, MD O
O Y
i
PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM
[1EETIflG AGENDA 0
INTRODUCTIONS & SUPPLY SYSTEM ORGANIZATION S. L. ADDITON O
PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM FOR WNP-1/4 & ldP-3/5 PROJECTS J. W. SALE PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES, AND SCOPE OF IDR PROGRAM PROPOSED IDR PROCESS, ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED, 8 DOCUMENTATION POSSIBLE SYSTEMS PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PROTOTYPE IDRS 0
REQUESTED NRC COMMITMENTS S. L. ADDITON O
SUPPLY SYSTEM CONCERNS ON IDR PROGRAM S. L. ADDITON O
DISCUSSION STATEMENTS OF UNDERSTANDING (NRC & SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMITMENTS)
O A
l l
l l
l l
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWEIt SUPPLY SYSTEM CliART I MAY 1981 MANAGING OIREC10fl R. L. FERGUSON DEPUIY MANAGING Dif1ECTOR A SOutitE IN1EllNAL AUDITit;G NUCLEAR SAFE 1Y J J WINII e o soUCHEY M AN A(,a n peHi t' I OR CHAAl 4 chant 2 EXECUTIVE OtjALITY ASSURANCE ASSISTANT D A IHOAt htN
=
n s GaAsscOCs thMtsvon CHARI 3 WNP l.4 PROGRAM WNP 2 PROGRAM WNP 3'5 PROGRAM POWEH GENEHAllOra D w uarun a o MAf tata a s stoneta a: Pe n sisNs a dHe (IOtt (HHii EOR psHti(OM ppMg(ION CHAAl$
CHARII CHAAlS (HAR{ g
- -. ~
,~.
MANAGEMENT POllC)
IE CalNOLOGY PUOL:" AFF AIRS ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTS &
illEASURY
& INF OllM AllON MATERIALS MGI
& SYSTEMS W D JAN5tN P % SHEN 1 E 36 UNI O n f M6NDI w 0 Atix&NDin J O PIMaO DeMiCInn EM4LIUA (HRtCION tet f. lust Dent L BOM gutAhuntn CHAMlb CHAAI50 l'HA AI ll CHANO82 (Hamt83 (HAntto e
e
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM _
CHART 2 MAY 1981 NUCLEAR SAFETY G.D.ROUCHEY DIRECTOR UCENSING OPERATIONAL DESIGM & NUCLEAR NUCLEAR SAFETY SAFETY ASSESSMENT o c sonsmsEN O & SainD
$ L ADDiTON M AN AGE H MAhACe(R MANAG$R I
j LICENSING
!AFEIYENGHG DE SIGN WNP 2 PROJECT G MUP WNP 2 ASSE SSMENI A M NetsON C.
& GHloN J w sAtt M. 446f A M AN At.t H MANAu n llCENSING SAFE TY ENGRG NUCLE AR SAFETY ANALYSIS WNP 1 4 PHOJECT GROUP WNP 1 4 a
A c nostra s c othesom a vossaunces M AN Ai A n MANA4.4 m M ANAGe u LICE NSING SAFLlYFNGHG NtsC SAF SIDS WNP 3 S PitOJf CI GROUP WNP 3 S
&lECHNOLOGY a w conu so w cos t M AN sM eAmen MA%44.f N M AhaQ M M A N at.t H h
e Y
f UF PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM OBJECTIVES UTILITY OWNERSHIP OF THE DESIGN PROCESS 0
ASSURE THAT THE DESIGN CONTAINS FEATURES THAT WILL PERMIT SAFE PLANT OPERATION 0
ASSURE THAT DESIGilS SATISFY REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND ENGINEERING CRITERIA O
IMPROVE PLANT OPERATIONAL RELIABILITY AND' AVAILABILITY ISSUE RES0tuTiott 0
ADI'RESS OPEN ITEMS EARLY IN THE REVIEW PROCESS o
PUBLICLY DOCUMENT ISSUE RESOLUTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESULTS
. PROPOSED IDR PROGRATI OBJECTIVES SCHEDULE CONTROL 0
ESTABLISH AN EARLIER LICEllSING REVIEW SCHEDULE EARLYIDENTIFICATIONOFLICENSINGIMPACTSbNDESIGNANDCONSTRUCTION
?
O RESOURCE UTILIZATION O
IMI' ROVE USE OF AVAILABLE TECHNICAL RESOURCES 0
BROADEN THE DESIGN REVIEW PERSPECTIVE O
REDUCE DEMAND ON NRC TECHNICAL REVIEW 1
4
PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM SYSTEM DESIGN REvlEWS SYSTEM o
{N-DEPTil, MULTI-DISCIPLINE DESIGN REVIEMS REVIEW O
ALL OWi!ER REQUIREMENTS 0
INDUSTRY CODES & STANDARDS O
FEDERAL & STATE REGULATIONS 0
MAJOR PLANT SYSTEMS IDR INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW 0
IN-DEPTH, MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW 0
FEDERAL E STATE REGULATIONS 0
MAJOR SYSTEMS THAT AFFECT PLANT SAFETY AND/OR llCENSABILITY 0
NRC PARTICIPATION
/
9 s
PROPOSED IDR PROGRAN REVIEW SCOPE EACH AGENDA WILL BE ESTABLISHED IN COOPERATION WITH THE NRC STAFF AND WILL INCLUDE:
e O
SYSTEM OVERVIEW LAYOUT OPERATION O
REGULATORY CRITERIA
. STANDARD REVIEW PLANS REGULATORY GUIDES GENERIC LETTERS ige BULLETINS 0
SYSTEM INTERFACES 0
TEST PROGRAft f
D S
M E
T A
V N
R L
A G
O T
O V
L R
N M
U P
I E
S T
R N
R S
S o
o D
N Y
D C
O S
N I
I E
E D
T Y.
V D
E A
L I
S Z
P S
S O
I P
C S
T P
N U
R E
S U
O A
S N
A N
O R
G P
R O
o o
o o
o Y
e PROPOSED IDR PROGRAfi REVIElf PROCFSS (20)
(5)
'(30)
I N D E P Erl D E tl T D E S I Gil INDEPENDENT OPEN ITE LOSEO REVIEW COMMITTEE p pg IEETING b,
FAMILIARIZATI0fl a
n (5)
(20)
(5)
(5)
AE AE PROJECT AE I
8 SSEMBLE NGINEERiilG PDATED S]ACKAGE llSCIPLIllE 3RE-MEVIEW ATA
,iATRIX &
ATA
+
McKAGE PLANNING
(
) = ESTIMATfD WORK DAYS 8
PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM IDR SELECTION CRITERIA INITI ATE SYSTEM SELCTION IN PARALLEL WITH FSAR ACCEPTANCE REVIEW SELECT SYSTEMS:
O FOR WHICH NRC REVIEW IS HAMPE. RED DOE TO INSUFFICIENT MANPOWER.
O WitOSE LICENSABILITY HAS BEEN OUESTIONED BY THE NRC.
O WHICH HAVE USED A NEW OR INNOVATIVE APPROACH.
0 'NOT REVIEWED AS GENERIC PLANT DESIGN.
O WHERE UNCERTAINTIES MAY INVOLVE SIGNIFICANT COST OR SCHEDULE IMPACTS.
l l
I
PRNT6ED 101 ParemM TENTATIVE SCHEDULE F0R PR0T0 TYPE IDR PR0 GRAM 12/81 3/82 6/82 9/82 12/82 i
i i
e 1
1 2
3 4
0 PROTOTYPE IDR UNP-1/4 V
U U
U PLAN IDR CLOSEOUT 1.
SusMIT FSAR (12/81) 2.
DOCKET FSAR (3/82) 3.
COMPLETE IDR (6/82) 4.
OPEN ITEM CLOSEOUT 8 SER PREPARATION (10/82) 1 2
3 0
PROTOTYPE IDR UNP-3/5 V
17 17 PLAN IDR 1.
SUBillT FSAR (3/82) 2.
DOCKET FSAR (6/82) 3.
COMPLETE IDR (9/82) 1 2
3 4
0 NRC SUPPORT MEETINGS 9
9 9
9 1.
UNP-1/4 SYSTEM SELECTION /
AGENDA (2/02) 2.
UNP-3/5 SYSTEM SELECTION /
AGENDi(5/82) 3.
UNP-1/4 IDR CRITIQUE (6/82) 4.
SUPPLY SYSTEM IDR PROGRAM REVIEW (10/82) 4
~
14 PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM REQUESTED NRC COMMITMENTS o
NRC COMMITTMENT TO SUPPORT THE RCVIEW TEAM WITil MANPOWER AND TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EFFORT UNTIL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITil Tile SYSTEM UNDER REVIEW ARE ADEQUATELY RESOLVED TO ALLOW FOR ISSUAllCE OF AN SER SECTION.
APPLICANT WILL NOT BE SUBJECTED TO AN NRC REVIEW 0F A SELECTED SYSTEM o
OUTSIDE THE EFFORT OF THE REVIEW TEAM, I.E., TilERE WILL BE ONLY ONE NRC REVIEW 0F A SELECTED SYSTEM AND TilAT WILL BE Ti1E NRC/ APPLICANT TEAM.
AT THE CONCLUSION OF T11E REVIEW TEAM'S EFFORT, THE APPLICANT WILL DOCUMENT o
IT'S COMMITTMENT TO ANY AGREED TO CHANGE AND TiiE NRC WILL DOCUMENT TilEIR CONCLUSION THAT ISSUES FOR THE SYSTEM UNDER REVIEW ARE SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED TO ALLOW ISSUANCE OF AN SER SECTION.
PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM CONCERNS FR031 A SUPPLY SYSTEi1 PERSPECTIVE o
IS THE IDR PROCESS COST EFFECTIVE?
o IS THERE A DIRECT LICENSING BENEFIT?
e ARE THERE BETTER WAYS To ACCELERATE LICENSING?
o WILL THE IDR CLoSE-ouT A SYSTEM REVIEW?
o WILL AN SER SECTION BE GENERATED FROM THE IDR?
o J
o DOES NRC SUPPORT EXIST AT ALL LEVELS?
HOW WILL REVISIONS TO THE SRP AFFECT THE IDR PROCESS AND o
COMPLETdDREviEWS?
o ASSIGNMENT OF SENIOR NRC REVIEWERS.
~
o APS AND MIDLAND EXPERIENCES D
PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM CANDIDATES FOR WNP-1/4 PROT 0iYPE IDR SYSTEMS SYSTEM BASIS 0
ESFAS/RPS/ECI/ SCI SYSTEMS POSSIBLE NRC MANPOWER PROBLEMS (FSAR CHAPTER 7) 0 FIRE PORTECTION SYSTEM DES!GN UNCERTAINTIES MAY INVOLVE SIGNIFICANT COST OR SCHEDULE IMPACTS
[
ON-SITE IE POWER SYSTEM POSSIBLE NRC MANPOWER PROBLEMS 0
AUXILIARY FEEDWATER LICENSING QUESTIONS SYSTEM a
Y m
c PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM CANDIDATES FOR WNP-3/5 PROTOTYPE IDR SYSTEf1S BA51S SYSTEM 0
EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLY POSSIBLE NRC MANPOWER PROBLEMS t
FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN UNCERTAINTIES MAY INVOLVE r
O SIGNIFICANT COST OR SCHEDULE IMPACTS AUXILIARY FEEDWATER POSSIBLE LICENS!flG QUESTIONS 0
SYSTEM DRY COOLING IO ER NEW, ll4NOVATIVE DESIGN 0
8