ML20049A637

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Slide Presentation Entitled, Independent Design Review Program for WNP-1/4 & Wnp 3/5,Supply Sys Meeting W/Nrc.
ML20049A637
Person / Time
Site: Satsop, Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date: 09/23/1981
From:
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
Shared Package
ML20010J392 List:
References
NUDOCS 8109300445
Download: ML20049A637 (16)


Text

.

si q

5 INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW giu PROGRAM 1

FOR WNP-1/I4 & WNP-3/5 SUPPLY SYSTEM IIEETING wiTH NRC .

AUGUST 20, 1981 BETilESDA, MD O

O Y

___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ___________._____i

PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM

[1EETIflG AGENDA 0 INTRODUCTIONS & SUPPLY SYSTEM ORGANIZATION S. L. ADDITON O PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM FOR WNP-1/4 & ldP-3/5 PROJECTS J. W. SALE

- PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES, AND SCOPE OF IDR PROGRAM

- PROPOSED IDR PROCESS, ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED, 8 DOCUMENTATION POSSIBLE SYSTEMS PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PROTOTYPE IDRS 0 REQUESTED NRC COMMITMENTS S. L. ADDITON O SUPPLY SYSTEM CONCERNS ON IDR PROGRAM S. L. ADDITON O DISCUSSION ,

O STATEMENTS OF UNDERSTANDING (NRC & SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMITMENTS)

A

l l

l l

l l

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWEIt SUPPLY SYSTEM CliART I MAY 1981 MANAGING OIREC10fl R. L. FERGUSON DEPUIY MANAGING Dif1ECTOR '

A SOutitE  ;

IN1EllNAL AUDITit;G NUCLEAR SAFE 1Y J J WINII e o soUCHEY M AN A(,a n peHi t' I OR chant 2 CHAAl 4 OtjALITY ASSURANCE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT

=

D A IHOAt htN n s GaAsscOCs thMtsvon CHARI 3 WNP 2 PROGRAM WNP 3'5 PROGRAM POWEH GENEHAllOra WNP l.4 PROGRAM a o MAf tata a s stoneta a: Pe n sisNs D w uarun psHti(OM ppMg(ION a dHe (IOtt (HHii EOR CHARII CHAAlS (HAR{ g CHAAl$

,~.

- - . ~ , - . - - ,

PUOL:" AFF AIRS ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTS & illEASURY MANAGEMENT POllC) IE CalNOLOGY MATERIALS MGI

& SYSTEMS & INF OllM AllON 1 E 36 UNI O n f M6NDI w 0 Atix&NDin J O PIMaO W D JAN5tN P % SHEN tet f. lust Dent L BOM gutAhuntn EM4LIUA (HRtCION DeMiCInn CHANO82 (Hamt83 (HAntto CHAMlb CHAAI50 l'HA AI ll e

    • e

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM _ CHART 2 ,

MAY 1981 NUCLEAR SAFETY G.D.ROUCHEY DIRECTOR OPERATIONAL DESIGM & NUCLEAR UCENSING NUCLEAR SAFETY SAFETY ASSESSMENT o c sonsmsEN O & SainD $ L ADDiTON MAhACe(R MANAG$R M AN AGE H I .

j

!AFEIYENGHG DE SIGN LICENSING G MUP WNP 2 ASSE SSMENI

_ WNP 2 PROJECT _

J w sAtt A M NetsON C. & GHloN M. 446f A M AN At.t H MANAu n SAFE TY ENGRG NUCLE AR SAFETY llCENSING ANALYSIS WNP 1 4 PHOJECT _ GROUP WNP 1 4 a s c othesom a vossaunces ,

A c nostra MANA4.4 m M AN Ai A n M ANAGe u LICE NSING SAFLlYFNGHG NtsC SAF SIDS GROUP WNP 3 S &lECHNOLOGY

_ WNP 3 S PitOJf CI _

sM eAmen a w conu so w cos t M AN M AhaQ M M A N at.t H MA%44.f N h

e Y

f UF -

PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM OBJECTIVES UTILITY OWNERSHIP OF THE DESIGN PROCESS 0 ASSURE THAT THE DESIGN CONTAINS FEATURES

  • THAT WILL PERMIT SAFE PLANT OPERATION 0 ASSURE THAT DESIGilS SATISFY REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND ENGINEERING CRITERIA O IMPROVE PLANT OPERATIONAL RELIABILITY AND' AVAILABILITY ISSUE RES0tuTiott 0 ADI'RESS OPEN ITEMS EARLY IN THE REVIEW PROCESS o PUBLICLY DOCUMENT ISSUE RESOLUTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESULTS

. PROPOSED IDR PROGRATI OBJECTIVES SCHEDULE CONTROL 0 ESTABLISH AN EARLIER LICEllSING REVIEW SCHEDULE

?

O EARLYIDENTIFICATIONOFLICENSINGIMPACTSbNDESIGNANDCONSTRUCTION RESOURCE UTILIZATION O IMI' ROVE USE OF AVAILABLE TECHNICAL RESOURCES 0 BROADEN THE DESIGN REVIEW PERSPECTIVE O REDUCE DEMAND ON NRC TECHNICAL REVIEW 1

4

PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM .

SYSTEM DESIGN REvlEWS SYSTEM o {N-DEPTil, MULTI-DISCIPLINE DESIGN REVIEMS .

REVIEW ,

O ALL OWi!ER REQUIREMENTS 0 INDUSTRY CODES & STANDARDS O FEDERAL & STATE REGULATIONS 0 MAJOR PLANT SYSTEMS -

IDR -- __

INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW 0 IN-DEPTH, MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW 0 FEDERAL E STATE REGULATIONS 0 MAJOR SYSTEMS THAT AFFECT PLANT SAFETY AND/OR llCENSABILITY 0 NRC PARTICIPATION

/

9 -

s

' PROPOSED IDR PROGRAN REVIEW SCOPE EACH AGENDA WILL BE ESTABLISHED IN COOPERATION WITH THE NRC STAFF AND WILL INCLUDE:

e O SYSTEM OVERVIEW LAYOUT OPERATION .

O REGULATORY CRITERIA ,

. STANDARD REVIEW PLANS REGULATORY GUIDES GENERIC LETTERS

- ige BULLETINS 0 SYSTEM INTERFACES 0 TEST PROGRAft f

D S M E T A V N R L A G O T O V L R N M U P I E S T R N R S S o o D N Y D C I O S N I E E D T Y. V D E A L I S Z P S S C S O I P T P N U R E S U O A S N A N O R G P R O o o o o o Y

e PROPOSED IDR PROGRAfi REVIElf PROCFSS (20) (5) '(30)

I N D E P Erl D E tl T D E S I Gil INDEPENDENT OPEN ITE LOSEO REVIEW COMMITTEE p pg IEETING b, FAMILIARIZATI0fl a n (5) (20) (5) (5)

AE AE PROJECT AE

  • I 8 llSCIPLIllE SSEMBLE NGINEERiilG PDATED 3 ATA

,iATRIX & ATA + RE-MEVIEW -

PLANNING S]ACKAGE McKAGE

( ) = ESTIMATfD WORK DAYS 8

PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM .

IDR SELECTION CRITERIA INITI ATE SYSTEM SELCTION IN PARALLEL WITH FSAR ACCEPTANCE REVIEW SELECT SYSTEMS: ,

O FOR WHICH NRC REVIEW IS HAMPE. RED DOE TO INSUFFICIENT MANPOWER.

O WitOSE LICENSABILITY HAS BEEN OUESTIONED BY THE NRC.

O WHICH HAVE USED A NEW OR INNOVATIVE APPROACH.

0 'NOT REVIEWED AS GENERIC PLANT DESIGN.

O WHERE UNCERTAINTIES MAY INVOLVE SIGNIFICANT COST OR SCHEDULE IMPACTS.

l l

I -

PRNT6ED 101 ParemM TENTATIVE SCHEDULE F0R PR0T0 TYPE IDR PR0 GRAM 12/81 3/82 6/82 9/82 12/82 i i i e 1 1 2 3 4 0 PROTOTYPE IDR UNP-1/4 V U U U PLAN IDR CLOSEOUT

1. SusMIT FSAR (12/81)
2. DOCKET FSAR (3/82)
3. COMPLETE IDR (6/82)
4. OPEN ITEM CLOSEOUT 8 SER PREPARATION (10/82) 1 2 3 0 PROTOTYPE IDR UNP-3/5 V 17 17 PLAN IDR SUBillT FSAR (3/82) 1.
2. DOCKET FSAR (6/82)
3. COMPLETE IDR (9/82) 1 2 3 4 0 NRC SUPPORT MEETINGS 9 9 9 9
1. UNP-1/4 SYSTEM SELECTION /

AGENDA (2/02)

2. UNP-3/5 SYSTEM SELECTION /

AGENDi(5/82)

3. UNP-1/4 IDR CRITIQUE (6/82)
4. SUPPLY SYSTEM IDR PROGRAM REVIEW (10/82) 4

~

14 -

PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM REQUESTED NRC COMMITMENTS ,

o NRC COMMITTMENT TO SUPPORT THE RCVIEW TEAM WITil MANPOWER AND TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EFFORT UNTIL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITil Tile SYSTEM UNDER REVIEW ARE ADEQUATELY RESOLVED TO ALLOW FOR ISSUAllCE OF AN SER SECTION.

o APPLICANT WILL NOT BE SUBJECTED TO AN NRC REVIEW 0F A SELECTED SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE EFFORT OF THE REVIEW TEAM, I.E., TilERE WILL BE ONLY ONE NRC REVIEW 0F A SELECTED SYSTEM AND TilAT WILL BE Ti1E NRC/ APPLICANT TEAM.

o AT THE CONCLUSION OF T11E REVIEW TEAM'S EFFORT, THE APPLICANT WILL DOCUMENT IT'S COMMITTMENT TO ANY AGREED TO CHANGE AND TiiE NRC WILL DOCUMENT TilEIR CONCLUSION THAT ISSUES FOR THE SYSTEM UNDER REVIEW ARE SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED TO ALLOW ISSUANCE OF AN SER SECTION.

PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM CONCERNS FR031 A SUPPLY SYSTEi1 PERSPECTIVE o IS THE IDR PROCESS COST EFFECTIVE?

o IS THERE A DIRECT LICENSING BENEFIT? ,

e o ARE THERE BETTER WAYS To ACCELERATE LICENSING?

o WILL THE IDR CLoSE-ouT A SYSTEM REVIEW?

o WILL AN SER SECTION BE GENERATED FROM THE IDR?

J o DOES NRC SUPPORT EXIST AT ALL LEVELS?

o HOW WILL REVISIONS TO THE SRP AFFECT THE IDR PROCESS AND COMPLETdDREviEWS?

o ASSIGNMENT OF SENIOR NRC REVIEWERS.

~

o APS AND MIDLAND EXPERIENCES D

PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM CANDIDATES FOR WNP-1/4 PROT 0iYPE IDR SYSTEMS SYSTEM BASIS 0 ESFAS/RPS/ECI/ SCI SYSTEMS POSSIBLE NRC MANPOWER PROBLEMS (FSAR CHAPTER 7) 0 FIRE PORTECTION SYSTEM DES!GN UNCERTAINTIES MAY INVOLVE SIGNIFICANT COST OR SCHEDULE IMPACTS [

ON-SITE IE POWER SYSTEM POSSIBLE NRC MANPOWER PROBLEMS 0

AC AND DC 0 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER LICENSING QUESTIONS SYSTEM a

Y

__m

c PROPOSED IDR PROGRAM CANDIDATES FOR WNP-3/5 PROTOTYPE IDR SYSTEf1S SYSTEM __ _

BA51S  :

0 EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLY POSSIBLE NRC MANPOWER PROBLEMS ,

t r

FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN UNCERTAINTIES MAY INVOLVE O

SIGNIFICANT COST OR SCHEDULE IMPACTS AUXILIARY FEEDWATER POSSIBLE LICENS!flG QUESTIONS 0

SYSTEM NEW, ll4NOVATIVE DESIGN 0 DRY COOLING IO ER 8

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _