ML20046D151

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Clarification on Two Listed Issues Re Rin 3150-AE4, FY1991 & 1992 Final Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules:100% Fee Recovery,FY1993
ML20046D151
Person / Time
Site: University of Illinois, 05000356
Issue date: 07/28/1993
From: Holm R
ILLINOIS, UNIV. OF, URBANA, IL
To: Holloway C
NRC OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER
Shared Package
ML20046D037 List:
References
FRN-58FR21662, RULE-PR-170, RULE-PR-171 NUDOCS 9308160210
Download: ML20046D151 (1)


Text

l

/

University of Illinois DePtrtment of College of Engineering Nuclear Engineering at Urbana-Champaign 214 Nuclear Engineenng 217 333-2295 laboratory 217 333-2906 fax 103 South Goodwin Avenue Urbana, IL 61801-2984 July 28,1993 Docket Nos. 50-151/50-356 I

Mr. C. James Holloway, Jr.

Office of the Controller U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sir,

in response to RIN 3150-AE49, "FY1991 AND 1992 Final Rule Implementing the U.S. Court of Appeals Decision and Revision of Fee Schedules: 100% Fee Recovery, FY1993", published in 58 FR 38666 (7/20/93) I would like clarification on two issues. It is inferred in the document that the "two part test" for an exemption from fees will be severe financial hardship and significant externalized benefits. No criteria for this test is defined.

What is the two part test?

What are the criteria for the test that will determine eligibility for an exemption?

Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter.

Respectfully,

/

/

/./

Richard L. Holm Reactor Supervisor cc: file 9308160210 930803 PDR PR 170 58FR21662 PDR

.