ML20045F542
| ML20045F542 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1993 |
| From: | Beach A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | William Cahill TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045F543 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9307080013 | |
| Download: ML20045F542 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000445/1993022
Text
UNITE D ST ATES
- g Mcg%
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
- r
.-
-
! j l.!
$
REGION IV
' 8
611 RYAN PLAZA 9 RIVE. SUIT E 400
o$
-
,,
AR LINGTON, T E XAS 760118064
....+
JLN 301993
Dockets: 50-445
50-446
Licenses: NPF-87
NPF-89
TV Electric
!
ATTN:
W. J. Cahill, Jr., Group Vice President
Nuclear Engineering and Operations
Skyway Tower
400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81
Dallas, Texas 75201
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-445/93-22; 50-446/93-22 (NOTICE OF
VIOLATION)
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. W. B. Jones, and the inspectors
identified in the enclosed report, of this office, on April 28 through May 29,
1993. The inspection included a review of activities authorized for the
!
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, facility. At the
conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with you and those
members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
,
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.
Within
>
these areas the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
,
activities in progress.
The purpose of the inspection was to determine
whether activities authorized by the licensee were conducted safely and in
accordance with NRC requirements.
'
Based on the results of this inspection, certain licensed activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of
Violation (Notice). The violation is of concern because a preventive
maintenance task was not performed on safety-related equipment for a period in
excess of twice the established frequency and a required technical evaluation
l
t
was not performed to assess the effect on the equipment.
Your staff indicated
that the safety significance of deferring the preventive maintenance task was
minor.
However, in assessing the overall significance of the violation we
noted that an April 1993 technical evaluation identified a programmatic
weakness with the preventive maintenance process which contributed to the
current deficiency and no corrective actions were implemented.
l
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence.
After reviewing your response to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
9307080013 930630
'
ADOCK 05000445
N\\
_
_.
_
..
_ . - _ .
.- .
,
.
i
TU Electric
-2-
I
i
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy
!
of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document
Room.
,
The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject
l
to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96.511.
I
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased
'
to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
,
,
i
,
,
tdMme
P
. Bill Beach, Director
l
Division of Reactor Projects
!
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A - Notice of Violation
2.
Appendix B - NRC Inspection Report
!
50-445/93-22; 50-446/93-22 w/ attachment
l
i
j
cc w/ enclosures:
TV Electric
1
ATTN:
Roger D. Walker, Manager of
.
1
Regulatory Affairs for Nuclear
Engineering Organization
i
Skyway Tower
i
400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81
Dallas, Texas 75201
Juanita Ellis
{
President - CASE
1426 South Polk Street
Dallas, Texas 75224
l
.
l
GDS Associates, Inc.
Suite 720
l
1850 Parkway P1 ace
l
Marietta, Georgia 30067-8237
l
!
i
!
<
,
t
!
!
-
i
1
. -
- - - .
- . _ ,
. .
- , ,
.
-
_
-_
_
_
.
.
,
i
i
h
f
TV Electric
-3-
..
TU Electric
Bethesda Licensing
j
3 Metro Center, Suite 610
!
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
l
Jorden, Schulte, and Burchette
ATTN:
William A. Burchette, Esq.
~
'
4
Counsel for Tex-La Electric
,
Cooperative of Texas
!
1025 Thomas Jefferson St., N.W.
!
,
Washington, D.C.
20007
Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.
ATTN:
Jack R. Newman, Esq.
!
1615 L. Street, N.W.
Suite 1000
Washington, D.C.
20036
,
'
Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation
ATTN:
G. R. Bynog, Program Manager /
l
Chief Inspector
,
Boiler Division
P.O. Box 12157, Capitol Station
.;
Honorable Dale McPherson
i
County Judge
!
P.O. Box 851
Glen Rose, Texas 76043
'
Texas Radiation Control Program Director
f
1100 West 49th Street
i
'
l
j
i
Owen L. Thero, President
Quality Technology Company
l
P.O. Box 408
i
201 West 3rd
!
Lebo, Kansas 66856-0408
j
4
'.
!
!
o'
1
i
.
j
i
l
i
J ..,
s.
%, Q
>
.
TU Electric
-4-
JJN 3 01993
t
!
.. lp f D
,
bcc-distrib. by RIV:
!
l
J. L. Milhoan
Resident Inspector (2)
Section Chief (DRP/B)
Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503
MIS System
DRSS-FIPS
,
,
RIV file
Project Engineer (DRP/B)
i
Section Chief (DRP/TSS)
A. B. Beach
!
!
'
,
,
i
k
P
l
,
i
f
f
l
i
!
+
l
,
RIV: SRI:DRP/B
RI:DRP/B
SRI:DRP/B PE M
C:DRP/B/
D:h
,
WBJones:de,/
GEPerndry, DNGrav[g,
LAYandeh
AdBbch
6/23/93
[I]6/29/93[ 6/7f/93[M 6M/93
6//f/93
600/93
I
I
L
l'
v
g,c 93G
7
,
,
.
.
)
-
'
.
TU Electric
-4-
JJN 3 01993
bcc distrib. by RIV:
J. L. Milhoan
Resident Inspector (2)
~,
Section Chief (DRP/B)
Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503
MIS Syste:n
DRSS-FIPS
RIV File
Project Engineer (DRP/B)
Section Chief (DRP/TSS)
A. B. Beach
e
!
>
>
b
t
>
RIV: SRI:DRP/B
RI:DRP/$
SRI:DRP/B PE M
C:DRP/B/
D:hP
'
WBJones: b /
GEWernby, DNGrav[re,
LAYandeY/ AbBkch
,
I
I
6/23/93
M1 6/?t/93[ 6/7f/93[q 6M/93
6//p/93
6/30/93
V
l'
V
Us= Rh
7