ML20045F333
| ML20045F333 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim, Seabrook |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1993 |
| From: | Wingo C Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Congel F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045F323 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9307070190 | |
| Download: ML20045F333 (6) | |
Text
. . . ., u. .- ;:...... . . . . . . .. . . ,,,, ,,,,, ,
,- s Enclosurs 1 Federal Emergency Management Agency n gsa
- [,! Washington, D.C. 20472 G,y -
JJJ 9 1993 Mr. Frank J. Congel, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuc1 car Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Congel:
I We have received a copy of the cnclosed April 27, 1993, letter from Edward J. Corcoran II, Chief Counsel to the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD), to the Senior Vice President-Nuclear of '
the Boston Edison Company (BECo) informing Deco that "BECo's use of [the MED maintenance facility in Wellesley) shall terminate as of December 31, 1993." The Wellesley MHD facility currently servcc as the reception centor for the communitics of Duxbury and Marshfield in the event of an accident at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station and for the communitics of Newbury end Newburyport in the event of an accident at the Scabrook Nuclear Power Station. We remain highly concerned with the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency's (MEMA) effortc to identify a new reception center facility (or facilities) to replace the facility at Wellosley.
Wo have been avare for some time that MHD was considering selling or leasing its Wellesley maintenance facility as part of its consolidation and privatization plan. However, the December 31,
- 1993, termination of the agreement for the use of the Wellesicy facility dictates that a suitable replacement facility for the Wellesley reception center be identitled as soon as possible.
Encloced is a copy of a Juno B, 1993, letter from Richard W.
Krimm, FEMA Deputy Associate Director for Stato and Local Programs and Support, to MEMA Director A. David Rodham regarding the imminent unavailability of the Wellesley facility, its impact on radiological emergency planning and preparedness at Pilgrim and Seabrook and the issues which need to be addressed.
FEMA would like NRC to coordinate with BECo and the North Atlantic Energy service Corporation, the licenses for Se,abrook, and ack the utilities to provide whatever assistance is needed by MEMA to resolve thic issue before December 1993. FEMA is available at your convenience to discuss issues related to the identification of the new reception center (s).
9307070190 930629 PDR ADOCK 05000293 PDR p
n ,, , . . . . , s.s..yo. .... . - - - - ~ - *-* ------ **
- If yccu have er.y questions or concerns please feel free to contact I ne at (202) 646-3026 or Margaret Lawless of-my staff at (202) 646-3027.
Sinc *oly, !
/-st $.l C aig S/ Wingo Assista.t Associato Director Offico of Technological Hazards Enclosures i
6 h
2
2;m.a w.cs.m .. . . m . ,. 3-. . w a_ --
Enclosure 2' 415""9d !
.. $'Ms Federal Emergency Management Agency i k h.qtalh Washington, D.C. 20472 ;
JUN - 6 S53 :
Mr. A. David Rodham .i Director Massachusetts Emergency Management Agoney {
400 Worcester Road P.O. Box 1496 f Framingham, MA 01701-0317
Dear r. Mbm:
l t
The Federal Emergency Managemont Agency (FEMA) has received a l copy of the enclosed-April 27, 1993, letter from Edward J. !
Corcoran II, Chief Counsel to the Massachusetts Highway '
Department (MHD), to the Senior Vice President-Nuclear of the Boston Edison Company (BECo) informing BECo that "BECo's use of
[the MHD maintenance facility in Wellesley) shall terminata as of December 31, 1993." As you know, the Wellesley MHD facility ,
currently serves as the reception center for the communities of '
Duxbury and Marshfield in the event of an accident at the Pilgrim .
Nuclear Power Station and for the communities of Newbury and .
Newburyport in the evont of an accident at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. We remain highly concerned with the Massachusetts !
Emergency Management Agency's (NEMA) efforts to identify a new r reception center facility (or facilities).to replace the facility at Wellesley. 1 We have been aware for some time that MHD was considering selling ;
or leasing its Wellesley maintenance facility as part of its consolidation and privatization plan. However, the December 31, ;
1993, termination of the agreement for the use of the Wellesley ;
facility dictates that a suitable roplacement facility for the i Wellesley reception center be identified as soon as possible. l FIMA understands, through discussions with your etaff, that MEMA is considering using two reception center facilities--one for the s affectod Seabrook communities and another for the affected l Pilgrim towns--to replace the Wellesley MHD_ maintenance facility. ,
1 Changing reception centers will nocessitata substantial plan changes to the Maasachusette Radiological Emergency Response Plan (MARERP) for Pilgrim and Seabrook. For example, plans and procedures, public information materials, emergency broadcast !
system messages and other documents such as traffic management manuals will have to be amended to address issues concerning the new reception center (e) . In addition, a new evacuation time estimate study will have to~be conducted for each site and its findings incorporated into the MARERP. New staff may have to be.
4
C ,
f id ent i f.i e d , and the staff for the new reception center (s) will have to be trained on the set-up of the facility as well as on ,
ronitorine, decontamination and registration activities.
Hereover, new congregate care centers and host schools may also hava to b6 identified which would require additional plan and map changes. The revised planning documents must be submitted to FEMA for review and approval.
F TEMA requests MIMA to develop and submit a plan with mi.lestones f established for accomplishing the necessary tasks to resolve the t issues concerning the withdrawal of the Wellesley reception
- ..ter er er available facility for radiological emergency preparedness purposes.
Given the critical importance of reception center functions in radiological energency planning and preparedness, unless7 alternate reception center facilities and trained'personne1Jare available at the time the wellesley facility is no longdr-available, including appropriate plan .and. procedure changes,lFEbut i believes that this could af fect the health and safety 4Bethew public residing in the Pilgrim emergency planning sons (EPE)?WW) the Massachusetts portion of the seabrook EPE in-the eventsaawa ,~
_ radiological emergency.
If planning and preparedness issues concerning the new reception ,
center (s) are resolved by December 1993, FEMA requests that the new Pilgrim reception center be demonstrated as part of the 1993 '
Pilgrim exercise. If outstanding issues remain at-the time that exercise is conducted, FEMA would like to see the new reception center demonstrated once those issues have been resolved. If '
there is a separate reception center facility for Seabrook, we would like to see that facility demonstrated ao part of the 1994 !
Seabrook exercise. It is no longer useful to demonstrate the l Wallosley reception center during the Pilgrim 1993 exercise ;
because of the imminent unavailability of the MHD facility.
'It should be noted that even at the present time staffing -
capabilitica for the Wellesley facility'are of major concern.
The April 27, 1993, letter from Mr. Corcoran states that, Hall MHD functions and o=ployees will have been relocated from Wellesley by Decerber," and that the MHD employees currently assigned to reception center functions will not be available to perform their duties at that time. It is TEMA's position that whenever sufficient trained MHD staff for the Wellesley facility are no longer available, alternate trained staff must be provided. FEMA requests MEMA to provide a schedule for ths withdrawal of MHD personnel from their assigned responsibilities at the Wellesley reception center. staffing rosters and training records for new personnel should be submitted to FEMA to document the availability of replacement staff.for the KHD personnel.
2 a
__r . _ _ _ _ _
SEid ' EY:r.: : 3 c : c h:;ic'r 'ib . ii- b-33 E : 50 3 ; 2025453506a ; 6 TEMA is available at your convenience to discuss issues related to the identification of the new reception conter(s) and the necessary plan modifications, If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact r.e at (202) 646-3692 or Craig Wingo, Assistant Associate Director of the office of Technological Hazards, at (202)-646-3026.
Sincerely, Richard W. Krina Deputy Associate Director State and Local Programs and Support Enclosure 3
. .. .. . ..N... . - l- - - -- - -- ~~~~
j...
Enclosure'3 .,
t
+
NNDYiff82 WEE""85WR 4h05I=i -
EWEW5%h)lf -
d My.hsw f. AMt0 hviCliked inwat 0:,+w Juts J. Kmsicles leybfoiBo$ngfd
$n.wy gc,m '
April 27, 1993 CLRTITIED XAIL I Boston 2dison Company
' facnior Vies Presidant - Nuclear 300 sey1 sten straat Bosten, MA 02189 :
Rat Notica to Terminata Lleansa A~reement forwallenlayXaintenan=aracllity '
boar sir This is(MHD),
Department to provide notice that the Massachusetts Highway .
formarly'XhcVn as the Massachusetts Department "
of Public Werks,.is exercising its right to terminate the license agreaeant betwoon Beaten Edison Cc:panya(3xco) r -the- Division of ' i Capital Planning and operations, and the Department, dated October 6, 1989, fer BECC's use of XHD's maintenance facility located in Ws11aalay. Notica is hereby given that BICO's use of said preparty shall terminats as of Decather 31, 1992. .
The Dep rtrent rac=gnizes BECO's nand to uss the preparty ger its nat.cnal readiness test in Cecaeler and haraby authorizes 3200's use of Wallasley for that purpose. BICO abould be preparad to una its evn personnsl, ce all XMC functions and nr.ployens v111 :
have been relecated fr::t Wallasicy by DecerJ:ar. ,
sitas Tha for capartment vill assist in its efterta to identify nov rece !
sena of the tiptien cantara. We also suggest tha.t BICC explora I itary facilities, including the National cuard sita nearby the =aintanance dapet in Wallsslay. !
i Hascachusetts Highway Departme..t l sy f I Edvard N Corocran II Its chief counsel-cc: cirector, Massachusetts res gency Management Agency [
ccanissioner, Massachusetta Divisien of
.g capital Planning and ocarations
i
, Docket No. 50-293 June 29, 1993 i Mr. E. Thomas Boulette, Ph.D Senior Vice President - Nuclear ,
Boston Edison Company Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station RFD #1 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360
Dear Mr. Boulette:
SUBJECT:
REPLACEMENT FACILITY FOR THE WELLESLEY RECEPTION CENTER Enclosed are three letters related to the impending loss of the Wellesley Reception Center (WRC), currently scheduled for December 1993. In the letter to Mr. Congel, dated June 9,1993, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) asked the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to coordinate with you and the Seabrook licensee to provide whatever assistance is needed by the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) to resolve the issues of a ,
replacement facility before December 1993. I know your staff is working to effect a timely solution to this issue, and I would request that your staff provide me with a schedule of your progress to date, and monthly updates until the new reception center is functional.
I feel it is important to emphasize to you the concern we share with FEMA that an alternate reception center be identified, that trained personnel be available, and that appropriate plan and procedure changes be made at the time the WRC is no longer available.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Ronald B. Eaton,' Senior Project Manager
-Project Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
- 1. Ltr. 6/9/93 FEMA to NRC ,
- 3. Ltr. 4/27/93 MASS Highway to BECO -
cc w/ enclosures: ,
See next page l DISTRIBUTION: PDI-3 Reading WButler OGC RErickson, 9H15 Docket File SVArga Slittle ACRS (10)
NRC & Local PDRs JCalvo REaton JLinville. RI ;
0FFICE PDI-3:LA PDI-g:,PM PEPN[ PDI-3:Df NAME SLitb b REaton:dt REhson WButler '
DATE 6 //'f/93 h /7'f/93 hfN/93 h/f'/93 3
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: A:\WRC.LTR Q)TPDj G- \ ~
s m.
_. f 3
's P_a? E UNITED STATES
'yljff j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ,
g ,c_ '. j. WASHINGTON, D.C. 2055MKX)1 June 29, 1993 Docket No. 50-293 Mr. E. Thomas Boulette, N.D Senior Vice President - Nuclear Boston Edison Company i Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station RfD #1 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360
Dear Mr. Boulette:
SUBJECT:
REPLACEMENT FACILITY FOR THE WELLESLEY RECEPTION CENTER i Enclosed are three letters related to the impending loss of the Wellesley Reception Center (WRC), currently scheduled for December 1993. In the letter to Mr. Congel, dated June 9,1993, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) asked the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to coordinate with you and the Seabrook licensee to provide whatever assistance is needed by the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) to resolve the issues of a-replacement facility before December 1993. I know your staff is working to effect a timely solution to this issue, and I would request that your staff provide me with a schedule of your progress to date, and monthly updates until r the new reception center is functional.
I feel it is important to emphasize to you the concern we share with FEMA that an alternate reception center be identified, that trained personne~l be available, and that appropriate plan and procedure changes be made at the time the WRC is no longer available.
Sincerely,
,f C onald B. Eaton, Senior Project Manager
'roject Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
- 1. Ltr. 6/9/93 FEMA to NRC
- 3. Ltr. 4/27/93 MASS Highway to BECO I
cc w/ enclosures:
See next page {
l
i
.- P Mr. E. Thomas Boulette Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station !
l I< CC; Mr. Edward S. Kraft, .
Mr. H. Vernon 0heim j Vice President of Nuclear. Marager, Reg. Affairs Dept. !
Operations & Station Director Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station !
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station RFD #1 Rocky. Hill Road :
RFD #1 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 . :
Mr. David F. Tarantino '
Resident Inspector Nuclear Information Manager V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Pilgrim Nuclear Power : ation ;
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station RFD #1, Rocky Hill Root Post Office Box 867 Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 Mr. Thomas Rapone ,
Chairman, Board of Selectmen Secretary of- Public Safety ;
11 Lincoln Street Executive Office of Public Safety Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 One Ashburton Place l Boston, Massachusetts 02108 i Office of the Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Mr. David Rodham, Director Environmental Protection Massachusetts Emergency Management ,
One Winter Street Agency Boston, Massachusetts 02108 400 Worcester Road i P.O. Box 1496 !
Office of the Attorney General Framingham, Massachusetts 01701-0317 !
One Ashburton Place Attn: James Muckerheide ;
20th Floor i Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Chairmen, Citizens Urging Responsible Energy ~!
Mr. Robert M. Hallisey, Director P. O. Box 2621 :
Radiation Control Program Duxbury, Massachusetts ~ 02331 l Massachusetts Department of .!
Public Health Citizens at Risk !
305 South Street P. O. Box 3803 Boston, Massachusetts 02130 Plymouth, Massachusetts 02361 ,j Regional Administrator, Region I W. S. Stowe, Esquire !
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Boston Edison Company :l 475 Allendale Road 800 Boylston St., 36th Floor j King.of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Boston, Massachusetts 02199 ;
Mr. Paul J. Hamilton Licensing Division Manager ;
Boston Edison Company ;
2S Braintree Hill Park j Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 l i
5
_ - ~ _- - - - _ _
Enclosure 1
, .i Federal Emergency Management Agency (tgs/[ Washington, D C. 20472 MW/ v JN 9 1933 Mr. Frank J. Congol, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguardc Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation t' . S . Nuc1 car Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Congel:
We have received a copy of the cnclosed April 27, 1993, letter from Edward J. Corcoran II, Chief Counsel to the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD), to the Senior Vice President-Nuclear of the Boston Edison Company (BECo) informing DECO that "EECo's use of [the MHD maintenance facility in Wellesley] shall terminate as -
of Decer.bcr 31, 1993." The Wellesley MHD facility currcntly servcc as the reception center for the communitics of Dunbury and ,
Marshfield in the event of an accident at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station and for the communitics of Newbury and Newburyport in the event of an accids at the Scabrook Nuclear Power Station. We remain high.j concerned with the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency's (MEMA) effortc to identify a new reception center facility (or facilities) to replace the facility '
at Wellosley.
- ?
Wo have been aware for some time that MHD was considering selling or leasing its Wellesley maintenance facility as part of its '
consolidation and privatization plan. However, the December 31,
- 1993, termination of the agreement for the use of the Wellesley facility dictates that a suitable replacement facility for the We11caley reception center be identified as soon as possible.
Enclosed is a copy of a Juno B, 1993, letter from Richard W.
Krimm, FEMA Deputy Associate Director for Stato and Local Programc and Support, to MEMA Director A. David Rodham regarding the imminent unavailability of the Wellesley facility, its impact on radiological emergency planning and preparedness at Pilgrim and Seabrook and the issues which need to be addressed.
FEMA would like NRC to coordinate with SEco and the North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation, the licenses for Seabrook, and ask the util$ ties to provide whatever assistance is needed.by MEMA to resolve this issue before December 1993. FEMA is availabic at your convenience to discuss issues related to the identification of the new reception center (s).
i
in.~u..hs,&,
. c.u ees c; .2. . .
. J ., .e-,.
^
s u . - e.; . . ~ .
1 I
l
-s If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (202) 646-3026 or Margaret Lawless of my staff at (202) ,
640-3027. ,
i 1
l Sinc oly, s S. ~
Craig S Wingo ,
Assista t Associato Director I office of Technological Hazards Enc 1ocures 4
4 E
1 L
t D
t t
I s
t 2
i 1
F
w.n.m, n. . , 2;m u . v.v-v . w.uw - -
' i; Enclosure 2.
i 4 + 7 _ Federal Emergency Management Agency ;
$ Washington, D.C. 20472 !
%Gs213S7 !
v JUN - 8 sg3 )
Mr. A. David Rodham Direct Massachusetts Emergency Managemens Agoncy f 400 Worcester Road i P.O. Box 1496 !
Framingham, MA 01701-0317 ,
Dear e. 3N55m:
Tho Foderal Emergency Managemont Agency (FEMA) has received a i copy of the enclosed April 27, 1992, letter from Edward J.
Corcoran II, chief Counsel to the Massachusetts Highway .
Department ( MHD) , to the Senior Vice Predident-Nuclear of the ;
Boston Edison Company (BECo) informing BECo that "BECo's use of- ,
[the MHD maintenance facility in Wellesley) shall-terminate as of !
December 31, 1993." As youiknow, the WellesJoy MHD facility .
currently servos as the reception. center for the communities of -;
Duxbury and Marshfield in the event of an accident at the1 Pilgrim i Nuclear Power Station and for the communities of Newbury'and :
Newburyport in the evont of an accident at the Seabrook Nuclear- '!
Power Station. Wo remain highly concerned with the Massachusetts l Energency Management Acency's (MEMA) efforts to identify a new .i rocoption centar facility (or facilities) to replace the facility i at Wellosley.
We have been aware for some time that MHD was considering selling l or leasing its Wellesley maintenance facility as part of its l consolidation and privatization plan. However, the December 31,- ;
1993, termiration of the agreement for the use of the Wellesley- l facility dictates that a suitable roplacement facility for-the ;
Wellesley r+0eption center be identified as soon as possible.
- FEMA. understands, through discussions with your staff, that MEMA is considering using two reception center facilities--one for the.
affected Snabrook communities and another for the affected .
Pilgrim towns--to replace the Wellesley MHD maintenance facility. , l Changing reception centers will necessitate substantial plan !
changes to the Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan. !
(MARERP) for Pilgrim and Seabrook. For example, plans and- i procedures, public information materials, emergency broadcast 't system mossages and other documents such as traffic managemont. l manuals will-have to be amended to address. issues concerning the !
now rocoption center (s), In addition, a now evacuation time ]
estimate study will,have to be conducted for each site and its :
findings incorporated into the MAREnP. New staff nay have to'be j l
l 1
1
~
a identified, and the staff for the new reception center (s) will l have to be trained on the set-up of the facility as well as on 1 sonitoring, decontamination and registration activities. l Moreover, new congregate care centers and host schools may also have to be identified which would require additional plan and map !
changes. The revised planning documents must be submitted to !
FEMA for review and approval. l TEMA requests MIMA to develop and submit a plan with milestones established for accomplishing the necessary tasks to resolve the ,
issues concerning the withdrawal of the Wellesley reception <
center as an available facility for radiological emergency preparedness purposes.
Given the critical importance of reception center functions in radiological emergency planning and preparedness, unless7 alternate reception center facilities and trained'personne1Jare i available at the time the Wellesley facility is no lengdr: !
available, including appropriate, plan and procedure changesAssu believes that this could affect'the health and eafetyJeBeth6 Lads ;
public residing in the Pilgria energency planning mane (EPE)*4ES ,
the Massachusette portion of the Seabrook EPZ in-the<evant,aba radiological emergency. ,
If planning and preparedness issues concerning the new reception i center (s) are resolvsd by December 1993, FEMA requests that the. ,
new Pilgrim reception center be demonstrated as part of.the 1993 '!
Pilgrim exercise. If_ outstanding issues remain at the time that !
exercise is conducted, FEMA would like to see the new reception center demonstrated once those issues have been resolved. If there is a separate reception center facility for Seabrook, we ,
would like to see that facility demonstrated as part of the 1994 j Seabrook exercise. It is no longer useful to demonstrate the We11ooley reception center during the Pilgrim 1993 exercise !
because of the imminent unavailability of the MHD facility.
It should be noted that even at the present time staffing capabilities for the Wellesley facility are of major concern.
The April 27, 1993, letter from Mr. Corcoran states that, "hil MHD functions and employees will have been relocated from Wellesley by December," and that the MHD employees currently assigned to reception center functions will not be available to .
perform their duties at that time. It is FEMA's position that [
whenever sufficient trained MHD staff for the Wellesley facility are no longer available, alternate trained staff must be ,
provided. FEMA requScts MEMA to provide a schedule for the ;
witndrawal of MHD personnel from th,eir assigned responsibilities !'
at the Wellesley reception center. Staffing rosters and. training records for new personnel should be submitted to FEMA to document .
the availability of replacement staff for the MHD personnel.
1 i
.5D.T CY: w :- lc c::;ict 7R D , E- s-53 9:501.M : 202 0 5.ibU5~ ;S 8 I
TEMA is available at your convenience to discuss issues related te the identification of the new reception conter(s) and the necessary plan =odifications.
If you havo any questions or concerns please feel free to contact ce at (202) 646-3692 or Craig Wingo, Assistant Associate Director of the Office of Technological Hazards, at (202) 646-3026.
Sincerely, Richard W. Krina Dcputy Associate Director .
State and Local Progra=s and Support Enclosure 5
3
a, . . - - .u.- - - ,-
. . . . .... . . ..... .. . - - -- - - - - - - - * ~ " ' '
~
Enclosure 3 4
?
i MNMh53$PN#2"""*
f[Mxrf WmpEM4 ~renmwb 3 I
Mayes piht saw hyn PIWCIM:i inuut.u w JntsJ.KvtsMn samy levd g e U g,49Q W um ,
i April 27, 1993 CERTITIED XAIL moston 2dison company ,
' saanier goo sey1 sten street vica Prssidant - Nuclear Besten, MA 02189 Re rsement Netice for wa11= te slay Terminata Maintenan=a Licensa rac A~llity Daar siri
.i l.
DepartThis is to provida n:tice that the Massachusetts Highvay
=ent'(MHD), ;
for=arly known as the Massachusetts Department _
of Public Werks, is exercising its right to terminata the licanse agraaeent betwoon Besten Edison company-453CO), the-Division of '
capitalPlanningandcparations,andtheDepartment, October 6, dated located in Welleslay. 1989, for BECO's use.of XHD's za.ntanance facility Notica is hereby given that BECQ's use of .
i said preparty shall-terminats as cf Decar.ber 11, 1993.
TheDeprtmentrecognizasarco'snandtounsthepreparty '
fer-its nat.cnal readiness test in tecar.ter and harshy authorizes '
320c's use of Wallasley for that purpose. BICC should ba prepared to una its evn personnal, ce all mmc functions and sr.ployams will _
have bee.n rsiccated fr:: Wellesley by Decesi:er, the Departtent vill assist in its efforts to identify nov sites for race tien centers. We also suqqsst tha.t RICO explors 1
some of the 21 Itary facilities, including the Natienal Cuard sits nearby the caintanance dspct in Wal;sslay.
Massachusetts Highway Depart?.ent 3y ._-
I Edvard f./ Cerocran II Its Chief Counsel ;
l cc: cirector, Maseachusetts energency Management _ Agency [
con ~.issioner, Massachusetta Divisien of
.g capital _ Planning and ocaratiens !
_ _ _ _ _ _ .