ML20045F203
| ML20045F203 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1993 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045F196 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-93-10, NUDOCS 9307070085 | |
| Download: ML20045F203 (2) | |
Text
-
1 t
~
Detroit Edison Compar.)
Docket No. 50-341 License No. NPF-43 As a result of thr; inspection conducted from May 4 through June 22, 1993, f
violations of NR'. requirem nts were identified.
In accordance with the
" General Statennt of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1993), the violations are listed below:
A.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, requires, in part, that a test program shall be established to assure that all testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will perform i
satisfactory in service is identified and performed in accordance with test procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design documents.
Contrary to the above, in November 1992, January 1993, and April 1993, modification work activities associated with Engineering Design Packages (EDP) 13590, ard 13907 on the High Pressure Coolant injection System, EDP 13498 on the Residual Heat Removal System; and EDP 13754 on the Reactor Cleanup System were completed with associated systems being declared operable and returned to service without performance of the post-modification testing specified in the associated EDPs.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement 1). (50-341/93010-08(DRP)
B.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures and shall be accomplished in accordance with these procedures.
Fermi Management Policy and Directive, FMD-CT1, paragraph 4.5.5.13 requires that surveillance procedures provide the acceptance criteria and the means by which the response is to be observed for each.
Contrary to the above, surveillance procedure 24.139.03, "SLC-Manual Initiation, RWCU lsolation, and Storage Tank Heater Operability Test" i
did not identify acceptance criteria for Technical Specification (TS) surveillance requirement 4.5.1.d.2.
This TS surveillance was to verify that safety relief valves for the Standby Liquid Control system did not actuate during recirculation to the test tank.
As a result, a surveillance performed in October 1992, in accordance with procedure 24.l?9.03 to meet TS 4.5.2.d, was noted as being " acceptable" even though safety relief valve C4100F029B actuated below 1215 psig during recirculation to the test tank.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement 1).
(50-341/93010-06(DRP) 9307070085 930630 PDR ADOCK 05000341 G
~
J l
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.2Dl, Detroit Edison Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control. Desk, Washington, D. C.
20555 I
with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III,'and a copy to the NRC~
l Resident Inspector at the facility -that is the subject of this Notice, within-30 days of the date of the letter transmitting the Notice of Violation
'i (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of i
Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for.the violation, or, if contested, the basis' for disputing the violation; (2) the corrective steps that-have been taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not t
received within the time specified'in the Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should^not bes taken. Where good.cause i
is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response ~ time.
Under the authority of Section'182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
I C*f k O il/M J2-Dated at Glen Ellyn, IL this 3(ih day of 7biC,1993 W. D. Shafer, Qhief i
Reactor Projects Branch 2 L
J r
l
[
i i
l L