ML20045E627
| ML20045E627 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045E621 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-338-93-14, 50-339-93-14, NUDOCS 9307020254 | |
| Download: ML20045E627 (2) | |
Text
_
4 ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket No. 50-338 and 50-339-North Anna Unit 1 and 2 License No. NPF-4 and NPF-7 During an NRC inspection conducted on April 4 - May 8, 1993, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:
A.
Technical Specification 3.0.4 requires entry into an operational mode or other specified applicability condition shall not be made unless the condition of the limiting condition for operation are met without reliance on provisions contained in the action statements unless otherwise excepted.
Technical Specification, Limiting Condition For Operation 3.7.1.2.b, requires for Modes 1, 2, and 3 one steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump capable of being powered from an operable steam supply system.
Contrary to the above, Technical Specification 3.0.4 was not met on April 8, and April 11, 1993, for changing from Mode 4 to Mode 3 and subsequently Mode 1 in that the steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump was not operable.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
B.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 ' requires that written procedures be established, implemented and maintained covering activities which include Surveillance and Test activities of safety related equipment.
Contrary to the above on March 22, 1993, Instrumentation Calibration Procedure, ICP-NI-2-N-42, Power Range Channel N-42 Protection Channel II, Revision 5, was not properly implemented as indicated below.
e ICP-NI-2-N-42 step 4.12.10.1. requires to remove detector B signal input plug P352 from the " Power Range Detector Load Box" and carefully connect it to Jack J352.
Step 4.12.10.2 requires to remove Detector A signal input plug P351 from the " Power Range Detector Load Box" and carefully connect it to jack J351. Step-4.12.10.3 requires to have a qualified individual independently verify that Detector A and Detector B signal cables have been reconnected. On March 22, 1993, while implementing section 4.12.10 of ICE-NI-2-N-42, the procedure was not followed in that signal input plugs to Power Range Channel N-42 detector A and B were connected in reverse.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
9307020254 930603 PDR ADOCK 05000338 G
9 Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket No. 50-338 and 50-339 North Anna Unit 1 and 2 License No. NPF-4 and NPF-7 C.
Technical Specification 4.6.4.2.a requires that each hydrogen recombiner system shall be demonstrated operable at least once per 6 months by verifying during a recombiner system functional test that the minimum heater sheath temperature increases to 2: 700*F within 90 minutes and is maintained for at least 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and that each purge blower operates for 15 minutes.
Contrary to the above, since March 16, 1992, the licensee failed to verify that each purge blower,1(2)-HC-F-1, is operated for 15 minutes at least once per 6 months.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Rc9 ion II, a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be i
achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 3rd day of June 1993 f
l