ML20045D961
| ML20045D961 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/18/1993 |
| From: | Selin I, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Synar M HOUSE OF REP., GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045D962 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9306300259 | |
| Download: ML20045D961 (37) | |
Text
-
~
ph[
/ja arew,%
UNITED STATES -
tt s
8 '* ) :,., l ' ;.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON D. C. 20555 i.
s-
- .' N s?C'% 'd (#j.
June 18. 1993
++..+
CH AIRMAN The Honorable Mike Synar, Chairman Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources Committee on Government Operations l'
United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515 j
Dear Mr. Chairman:
I am pleased to provide responses to questions posed in your.May.4,-l1993 letter regarding NRC activities under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act and....
NRC practices-in the regulation of materials' licensees.
The NRC staff has -
renumbered the questions from_this letter to follow sequentially the previous
-l two letters.. Enclosed is a mark-up key of your May. 4, -1993 : letter with the new numbers. We will continue to renumber new questions sequentially.
l In addition, I am providing the response, to. Question :18f from your. letter of.'
i March 25, 1993.
This completes the-requests from your March 25, 1993 letters.
t Sincerely, l
/
cM" Ivan Selin i
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
Rep. J. Dennis Hastert (w/ enclosures) f i
9306300259L.930618 i-PDR COMMS,NRCC" CORRESPONDENCE PDR 3l I
p 1
c
.I
s Question 18f.
Identify, for each state, NRC region and total, the number of violations incurred by, and enforcement; actions taken by NRC for each category of materials license, and calculate the rates of such violations and enforcement actions per 100 licensees for each state, NRC region, and total for each of the past five years.
Categories of material licenses should be those used by AEOD in its annual report (see Table A-1, NUREG-1272, Appendix A).
Answer.
The attached tables provide FY 1989-1993 information ou 404 enforcemrant actions taken by NRC categorized by licensee in each state and NRC region.
L l
Categories of material licensees are those used by AE0D.
The NRC enforcement l
action tracking system (EATS) only maintains data on escalated enforcement actions (Severity Level I, II, III).
The EATS lists the severity level of the escalated enforcement action and does not list each specific violation. NRC l
does not have any reliable computer database on non-escalated enforcement actions. Additional enforcement actions taken against general licensees under Agreement State reciprocity are not included in these figures.
These cases are reflected in the answer to Question 24 of the May 4,1993 questions.
i l
-.,,,_..,..m
b Question 18f.
(continued) f Backaround/ Additional Information B
FY89 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS' (10/1/88 to 9/30/89)
L Reaion Cateaory RI RII RIII RIV RV TOTAL Academic 1
1 0
0 0
2 Medical 19 8
13 6
4 50 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Systems 4
0 4
9 5
22 Manufacturing & Distrib.
2 0
0 1
0 3
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Multiple 3
1 2
1 3.
10 Irradiators 1
1 0
0 0
2 Research & Development 1
0-1 0
0 2
t Mills 0
0 0
1 0
1 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 OtberSourceMaterial 0
0 1
0 0
1 Special Nuc. Material 2
2 0
0 0-4 Other Non-Reactors 1
0 1
1 0
3 TOTAL:
34 13 22 19 12 100 FY90 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS (10/1/89 to 9/30/90)
Reaion Catecory El RII Bill RIV BY TOTAL Academic 0
0 1
0 0
1 Medical 17 9
12 5
2 45 Bell-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Systems 3
1 5
5 0
14 Manufacturing & Distrib.
1 0
4 0
0 5
l Radiography-Fixed Site 0
1 0
0
'O 1
Radiography-Multiple 6
3 3
6 0
.18 1rradiators 0
0 1
0 0
1 Research & Development 3
1 2
1 0
7 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
2 0
2 6
l Other Source Material 0
0 0
1 0
1 l
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0' 0
0 Other Non-Reactors 1
0 1
1 0
3 l
TOTAL:
31 15 29 21 2
98
i Question 18f.
(continued) i FY91 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS (10/1/90 to 9/30/91)
Reaion Cateaory RI RII RIII RIV RV TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0' Medical 8
4; 9
4 3
28 L' ell-Logging 0
0 0
0-
~0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
3 5
-1 0
9 Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
1 0
0 1
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
1 0
0-0 1.
Radiography-Multiple _
3 0.
6 5
4 18-Irradiators 1
0 0
0 0
1:
l Research & Development 1
1 1
.0 0
3.
l Mills 0
0 0
-0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
l Other Source Material 1
0 1
0 0
2 Special Nuc. Material 1
41 1
0 0
6 Other Non-Reactors 1
0' 0
1 1
3 TOTAL:
16 13 24 11' S
72 FY92 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS l
(10/1/91 to 9/30/92) f Reaion Cateaory RI RII
-RIII RIV RV TOTAL i
Academic 0
0 1
0 0
1 Medical 21 10 10 5
1 47 i
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0
- O 0
Other Measuring Systems 2
'4 7
1 1
15~
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0
-0 0
0 4
l Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0.
0 0
0 Radiography-Multiple 3
3 5
3 0
14 l
1 Irradiators 0
0 3
0 0
'3 Research & Development 0
1 0
0 0-1 i
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
6 0
6-6 Other Source Material 1
0 0
0 0
1 Special Nuc. Material 0
3 0
0 0
3 Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL:
27 21 26 15 2
91 3
l t
i i
j I
Question 18f.
(continued) FY93 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS (10/1/92 to 3/31/93)
Region Ca%ecory RI RII RIII RIV RV TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 Medical 10 1
3 0
5 19 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Systems 1
3 10 1
0 15 Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Multiple 0
1 3
0 0
4 Irradiators 0
0 1
0 0
1 Research & Development 2
0 0
0 0
2 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
6 Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Special Nuc. Material 0
1 0
0 0
1 Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 1
1 TOTAL:
13 6
17 1
6 43 l
FY89 ENFORCEMENT ACTICNS FOR MATERIALS LICENSEES BY STATES & WITHIN NRC REGIONS i
(10/1/88 to 9/30/89)
Enforcement Actions Against Licensees located in NRC Region I l
Cateaory CT DC DE MA MD ME NH NJ NY PA RI VT TOTAL Academic 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Medical 3
1 1
5 1
0 0
4 0
4 0
0 19 Mell-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 4
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
2 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 0
0 3
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special Nuc. Material 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 2
i Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
TOTAL:
5 1
1 6
1 0
0 6
0 14 0
0 34 CODES FOR REGION 1: CN CANADA, CT-CONNECTICUT, DC-DISTRICT CF CC.UMBI A, MA-MASSACHUSETTS, MD MARYLAND, ME MAINE, NH-NEW HAMPSHIRE, NJ-NFW JERSEY, NY-NEW YORK, PA PENNSYLVANIA, R.- RHODE ISLAND, VT-VERMONT l
.a
_AL.
N 4
ss ama
.n.-
r.m-a
- x-a,u,ep
.se m
l 1
Ouestion 18f.
(continued) l-i Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees located in NRC Recion 11 l
i CateQorY AL FL-GA KY MS NC PR
_SC TN VA VI WV
- TOTAL Academic 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0
'O O
O O'
1 i
Medical 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
4 0
3 8
i Well-Logging 0
-0 0
0 0
0 0
0.-
0
_0 0
0 0_
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0
-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Manufacturing & Distrib. 0 0
0 0
0 0
- 0 0'
0 0.
0 0
_0
)
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
_ 0.
0 0
- O 1
0; 1.
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 1-0 0
0 0
0 1
Research & Development 0
0 0
0-0 0
-0 0
-0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0-j UF Facilities.
.0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0:
0 0
0
' O 6
Other. Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0-0.
0 0-0 0
0 l
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0-
-0 0
0 1
.0 1
0 0
2 l
Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
'O O
0 0
0 0
I TOTAL:
0 0
1 0
0 0
2
~1-0 6
0
-3 13-CODES FOR REGION !!: AL-ALABAMA, FL-FLORIDA, GA-GEORGI A, KY KENTUCKY, MS MISSIS $1PPI, NC NORTH CAJOLINA, PR-PUERTO RICO, SC SOUTH CAROLINA, TN-TENNESSEE, VA-VIRGINI A, VI-VIRGIN ISLANDS, W-WEST VIRGIN!A Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion III Cateaory IA IL IN MI MN M0 OH WI TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0-0 0-
-0~
0-0 Medical 0
0 1
4 2
2 3-1 13 Well-Logging 0
_0 0-0 0-0-
0 0
-0 Other Measuring Systems-0 1
0 2
0 0
1-O_
4 Manufacturing & Distrib. 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0'
O O
O-0
.i Radiography-Multiple 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 2
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0-0 0
0 0
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 1-0
_1 l
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
OtberSourceMaterial 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
l TOTAL:
0 2
1 8
2 2
6 1
22 CODES FOR REGION 1113 -IA-10WA, IL-ILLIN015, IN* INDIANA, Mla MICHIGAN, MNa MINNESOTA, Moa MISSOURI, OH CHIO, Wl WISCONSIN l
l L
.)
l l
_Q.uestion 18f.
(continued) Erlforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion IV l Cateocr_y AR C0 ID KS LA MT.
ND NE NM OK SD-TX UT WY TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
0 0
0-0 Medical 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5
.0
-0 0:
1 6
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Sys.0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 5
0 2
0 0
9 Manufacturing & Dist0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1.
0 0
0 0
1 Radiography-Fixed 0 0
0 0'
0 0
0' 0
0 0
_0 0
0 0
0 q
l Radiography-Mult.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
-1 1
l Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
.0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
0 0
l l Research & Dvt.
0 0
0 0
0
'O O
0-O_
0 0
0;
- 0 0
0 l Mills 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-0 0
0 0
1 Facilities 0
-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
.0 0
0 0
0 O
l UF,ner Source Mat'l i
Ot 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
0 0~
Special Nuc. Mat'l 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-0 Other Non-Reactors 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
.0 0
0 1
0 0
1 TOTAL:
0 1
0 2
0 0
'O O
O 12 0
3-0 1
19 CODES F03 REGION IV:
AR-ARKANSAS, CD-COLORADO, ID IDAHO, KS KANSAS, LA LOUISI ANA, MT-MONTANA, hD-NORTH DAKOTA, NE-NEBRASKA, NM* HEW MEXICO, OK OKLAHOMA, SD SOUTH DAKOTA, TX-TEXAS, UT UTAH, WY-WYOMING Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees Located in NRC Reaion V j
Catecory AK AS AZ CA GU HI NV OR-WA TOTAL
]
Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-Medical 0
0 0
2 0
2 0
0 0
'4 l
l dell-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 2
0 2
1 0
0 0
5
(
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
1 0
2 0
0 0
3 l
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 j
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
'O 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
OtI1erSourceMaterial 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.
0 0
I l
TOTAL:
0 0
2 3
2 5
0 9
0 12 CODES FOR REGION V:
AK-ALASKA, AS-AMERICAN SAMOA, AZ-ARIZONA, CA-CALIFORNIA, GUa "UAM, Hi HAWAll, NV-NEVADA, OR OREGON, WA-WASHINGTON
Question 18f.
(continued) FY90 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS FOR MATERI ALS LICENSEES BY STATES & WITHIN NRC REGIONS (10/1/89 to 9/30/90)
Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion I Cateaory CT DC OE MA MD ME NH NJ NY PA RI VT TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 2
3 1
0 0
0 0
6 2
3 0
0 17 Hell-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 3
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
3 0
1 0
0 6
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Development 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 3
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 C
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
TOTAL:
3 4
1 4
1 0
0 10 2
6 0
0 31 COCES FOR REGION I:
CN-CANADA, CT-CONNECTICUT, DC-DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MA MASSACHUSETTS, MD-MARYLAND, ME MAINE, hM-HEW HAMPSHIRE, NJ-NEW JERSEY, NY-NEW YORK, PA-PENNSYLVANI A, RI-RH00'd ISLAND, VT-VERMONT
i l
Question 18f.
(continued) Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees Located in NRC Recion II u
Cateaory AL FL GA KY MS NC-PR SC TN -- VA VI WV TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0-0 0
0 0
~ 0 0
0 Medical 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0-0 4
0 2
9 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0
-0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
l' 3
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-0.
0
.0 0
0 0
Research & Development 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Mills 0
0
-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
.0 0
0 0.
0 0
0
.0 0
0 0
0 OtberSourceMaterial' 0
-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special.Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
'Other Non-Reactors
'O 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL:
0 1
0 0
0.
0:
4-1 0
6 0
-3
-15 CODES FOR REGION !!: AL ALABAMA, FL-FLORIDA, GA GEORGI A, KY-KENTUCKY, MS MISSISSIPPI, NC-NORTH CAROLINA, PR PUERTO RICO, SC-south CAROLINA, TN-TENNESSEE, VA* VIRGINI A, VI VIRGIN ISLANDS, WV* WEST VIRGINI A i
Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees Located in NRC Reaion III i
Cateaorv IA IL IN MI-.MN M0 OH WI TOTAL Academic 0
.0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
Medical 1
0 3
0 0
2 6
0 12 Mell-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 1
2 0
1 1
0 5
Manufacturing & Distrib. 0 0
0 0
1 1
2 0
4 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
1 0
0 0
0 2.
0
.3 Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 2
l l
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0
.0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 1
TOTAL:
1 1
4
~2 3
6
-11 1
29 C00ES FOR REGION !!!!
IA-10WA, IL ILLINOIS, IN-INDl%A, M1-MICHIGAN, MN. MINNESOTA, MO MISSOURI, CH-OHIO, WI WISCONSIN L
.. ~.
Question 18f.
(continued) Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion IV Catecory AR C0 ID KS LA MT ND NE NM OK SD TX UT WY TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
2 0
1 0
1 5
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Sys.0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
5 Manufacturing & Dist0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Mult.
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 1
0 1
6 Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Dvt.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 2
6 Other Source Mat'l 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
Special Nuc. Mat'l 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Non-Reactors 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 TOTAL:
1 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 11 1
4 0
2 21 CODES FOR REGION IV:
AR-ARKANSAS, CO-COLORAJO, ID-IDAHO, KS-KANSAS, LA-LOUISI ANA, MT-MONTANA, hD-NORTH DAKOTA, hE-NEBRASKA, hM-NEW MEXICO, OK-OKLAHOMA, SD-SOUTH DAKOTA, TX-TEXAS, UT-UTAH, WY WYOMING Enforcement Actions Against Licensees located in NRC Region V Cateaory AK AS AZ CA GU HI NV OR WA TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Medical 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
2 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Special Nuc. liaterial 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL:
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 2
CODES FOR REGION V:
AK-ALASKA, AS-AMERICAN SAMOA, AZ-ARIZONA, CA-CALIFORNIA, GU GUAM, HI-MAWAll, NV NEVADA, OR + OREGON, WA-WASHINGTON l
l l
T
i Question 18f.
(continued) FY91 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS FOR MATERIALS LICENSEES BY STATES & WITHIN NRC REGIONS (10/01/90 to 9/30/91)
Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion I Cateaory CT DC DE MA MD ME NH NJ NY PA RI VT TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
2 4
0 0
8 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
-0 Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0:
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 3
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
Research & Development 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0-0-
0-UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0-0 1
0 0
0 1
l Other Non-Reactors 0
- 0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 TOTAL:
0 1
0 2
0 0
0 3
3 6
0 0
16 CODES FOR REGION !! CN CANADA, CT-CONNECTICUT, DC-nISTRICT OF COLUMBI A, MA-MAS $ACHUSETTS, MD-MARYLAND, ME MAINE, NH-NEW HAMPSHIRE, NJ NEW JERSEY, NY-NEW YORK, PA PEhhSYLVANI A, RI RHODE !$ LAND, VT VERMONT Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion II Cateaory AL FL GA KY MS NC PR SC TN VA VI WV TOTAL l
Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
0 0
Medical 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
1 4
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0-0 2
0 0
3 Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0
-0 0
0 0,
0 1
0 0
0-0 1
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
i Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l Research & Development 0
0 0-0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0-0 0
6 Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-0 0
0 Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 2
1 0
0 4
Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.
O TOTAL:
0 0
1 0
0 1
I 1
3 5
0 1-13 CODES FOR REGION 11:
AL-ALABAMA, FL FLORIDA, GA* GEORGI A, KY-KENTUCKY, MS-MISSISSIPPI, NC-NORTH CAROLINA, PR PUERTO RICO, SC-SOUTH CAROLINA, TN TENNESSEE, VA VIRGINI A, VI-VIRGIN ISLANOS, WV WEST VIRGINI A
i Question 18f.
(continued) i Enforcement Actions Aqainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion III Category IA IL IN MI MN MO
' 0H - WI' TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0
-0
-0
.- 0 Medical 0
0 1
3 0
.1 3
1 9
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 2
2 0
0 1-0 5
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0:
0:
^0 0
0 Radiography-Multiple 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
-2.
6-J Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0' 0
H
'Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
-0 1
0 1:
i Mills 0
0 0
0 0
.0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0-0 0
0 0
0
.0 0
3 Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0.
-0 0
0 1
Special Nuc. Material
.0 0
0-0 0
1~
O' 0
1-Other Non-Reactors 0
0-0 0
0.
0-0 0
0-l l
TOTAL:
0 2
3 7
0 3
6 -.
3 24 CODES FOR REGION !!::
lA-10WA, IL-ILLINDIS, IN-INDI ANA, Mi-MICHIGAN, MN* MINNESOTA, l
MO-MISSOURI, OH C410, Wl-WISCONSIN l
Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion IV i
Cateaory AR C0 ID KS LA MT ND NE NM OK SD-TX UT WY TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
- 0.
O
_0 0
0 0
0 i
Medical 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 1
!O O
1 4'
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0-0 0.
0-0 0
0 i
Other Measuring Sys.0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0'
0 1
0-0 0
0 1
L Manufacturing & Dist0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0' 0
0
-0 0
0 0-Radiography-Fixed 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0'
0 Radiography-Mult.
2 0
0 0
0-0 0
0 0
0 0
3-0 0
5 Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
.Research & Dvt.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O' 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0-0 0
0
-0 0
0-0 0
0 0-6 Other Source Hat'l 0 0
0-0 0
0 0'
0-0 0
0 0
- 0
-0.
-0 Special Nuc; Mat'l 0 0
0
-0 0
0 0.
0 0
0 0-
-0 0
0 0
Other Non-Reactors 0 0
0
'O O
'O O
O O
1 0t 0
0
- D 1
l TOTAL:
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
-4 1
13 0
-1 11 CODES FOR REGION IV:
AR* ARKANSAS, CO COLORADO, ID-IDAHO, KS* KA!!SAS, LA--LOUIS 1 ANA, MT* MONTANA,' O NORTM DAKOTA, NE-NEBRASKA, NM-HEW MEXICO, OK-OKLAHOMA, SD* SOUTH DAKOTA, TX+ TEXAS, UT-UTAH, WY WYOMING
.,,4
l l
1 I
I l
Ouestion 18f.
(continued) i Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion V CateaorY AK AS AZ CA GU HI NV OR WA TOTAL
.Scademic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Medical 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 1
3 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
4 l
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 TOTAL:
0 0
0 2
0 5
0 0
1 8
l CODES FOR REGION V:
AK-ALASKA, AS-AMERICAN SAMOA, AZ-ARIZONA, CA-CALIFORNIA, CU-GUAM, l
Hl-MAWAll, NV-NEVADA, OR-OREGON, WA-WASHINGTON FY92 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS FOR MATERIALS LICENSEES BY STATES & WITHIN NRC REGIONS (10/01/91 to 9/30/92)
L l
Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees Located in NRC Reaion I Category CT DC DE MA MD ME NH NJ NY PA RI VT TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 1
3 0
1 0
0 0
10 1
4 0
1 21 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 2
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 3
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-0 0
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0-0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 Other Source Material 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1-Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
'O Other Non-Re::ter:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL:
2 3
0 1
0 0
0 14 1
4 1
1 27 CODES FOR REGION 1:
CN-CANADA, CT-CONNECTICUT, DC-DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A, MA-MASSACHUSETTS, MD MARYLAND, ME-MAINE, NH-NEW MAniPSHIRE, NJ-NEW JERSEY, NY NEW YORK, PA PENNSYLVANI A, RI- (MODE ISLAND, VTa VERM0'lf
i Question 18f.
(continued) Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees Located in NRC Reaion II_
l, Cateaory Al FL GA KY MS NC PR SC TN VA VI WV TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 1
0 0
0 0
0 4
1 0
2 0
2 10 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
1 4
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
1 0
0 3
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l Otber Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
1 0
0 3
i Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL:
1 0
0 0
0 2
6 1
1 7
0 3
21 CODES FOR REGION 11:
AL-ALABAMA, FL FLORIDA, CA-GEORGIA, KY-KENTUCKY, MS-MISSISSIPPI, NC-NORTH CAROLINA, PR* PUERTO RICO, SC SOUTH CAROLINA, IN-TENNESSEE, VA-VIRGINI A, V!- VIRGIN ISLANDS, WV-WEST VIRGINI A Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion III
'CTAL f
Category IA IL IN MI MN M0 OH WI i
Academic 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
Medical 0
1 1
2 0
2 1
3 10 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 3
0 0
1 0
3 7
l Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 l
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
1 0
2 2
0 5
R&D 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 3
l Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
t UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l OtberSourceMaterial 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l TOTAL:
0 1
5 6
0 5
3 6
26 CODES FOR REClON !!!:
!A-IDWA, IL-ILLINOIS, IN. tuntawa, M1-MICH!GAN, MN-MINNESOTA, MO MISSOURI, OH CHIO, Wl WISCONSIN i
l -
. question 18f.
(continued) Enforcement Actions Against Licensees Located in NRC Recion IV CateaorY AR C0 ID KS LA MT ND NE NM OK SD TX UT WY TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 0
0 0
0 0.
1 0
0' 0
2 0
2 0
0 5
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Sys.0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 Manufacturing & Dist0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
'O O
O O
O Radiography-Fixed 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Mult.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 2
0 0
3 Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Dvt.
0 0
0 0-0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0~
0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 0
0-
'O
-0 6
3 Other Source Mat'l 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0' 0
Special Nuc. Mat'l 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
=0 0
Other Non-Reactors 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-0 0.
TOTAL:
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0-9 0
5 0
0.
15 CODES FOR REGION IV: AR ARKANSAS, CO-COLORADO, ID* IDAHO, KS-KANSAS, LA LOUISI ANA, MT MoxTANA, hD-NORTH DAKOTA, NE %EBR ASKA, NM NEW MEXICO,. 0K-CKLAHOMA, St,- SOUTH CAKOTA, TX TEFAS, UI-~ UTAH, WY-WYOMING Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Recion V CateaorY AK AS AZ CA GU HI NV OR WA TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0' O
O-0 0
Medical 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.
0 1
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Systems 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0
'O 0
0 0
0 0
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
'O 0~
0 TOTAL:
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
'O 2
CODES FOR REGION V: ' AK ALASKA, AS-AMERICAN SAMOA, AZ* ARIZONA, CA* CALIFORNI A, GU+ GUAM, H]* HAWAl!, NV NEVADA, OR OREGON, WA WASHINGTON i
i L
m
-..... a.
. o
-Ouestion 18f.
(continued) FY93 ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS FOR MATERIALS LICENSEES BY STATES & WITHIN NRC REGIONS (10/1/92 to 3/31/93) 1 Enforcement Actions Against Licensees located in NRC Region !
Cateaory CT DC DE MA MD ME NH NJ NY PA RI VT TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 2
0 2
0 1
0 0
3 0
2 0
0 10 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
j Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Ra'diography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.
0 0
0:
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
j Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 2
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
UF. Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
OtberSourceMaterial 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Non-Re6ctors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL:
2 0
2 1
1 0
0 5
0 2
0 0
13 CODES FOR REGION 1:
CN-CANADA, CT-CONNECTICUT, DC-DISTRICT OF COLUMBI A, MA-MASSACHUSETTS, MD MARYLAND, ME MAINE, hM NEW HAMPSHIRE, NJ-NEW JERSEY, NT* NEW YORK, P A PENNS)LVANI A, RI RHODE ISLAND, VT-VERMONT Enforcement Actions Against Licensees located in NRC Reaion II Cateaory AL FL GA KY MS NC PR SC TN VA VI WV TOTAL l
Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
'O O
Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
1 3
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 -
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0-Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL:
0 1
0 0
0 0
3 0
1 0
0 1
6 CODES FOR REGION 11: AL ALABAMA, FL-FLORIDA, GA-GEORGI A, KY-KENTUCKY, MS MISSISSIPPI, NC-NORTH CAROLINA, PR PUERTO RICo, SC SOUTH CAROLINA, TN TENNESSEE, VA-VIRGINI A, VI-VIRGIN ISLANDS, WV WEST VIRGINI A
Question 18f.
(continued) Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion III Cateoorv IA IL IN MI MN M0 OH WI TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 0
0 1
0 0
1 1
0 3
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Systems 0
1 1
2 0
2 3
1 10 Manufacturing & Distrib. 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Multiple 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 3
Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
j Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
i UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
i 6
Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 TOTAL:
0 3
3 2
0 3
5 1
17
- CODES F02 REGION 111
lA-10WA, IL ILLINOIS, IN-IN01ANA, Mi-MICHIGAN, MN MINNESOTA, MO-MISSOURI, OH CHlo, Wl-wlSCONSIN Enforcement Actions Acainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion IV Cateaory AR C0 ID KS LA MT ND NE NM OK SD TX UT WY TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Medical 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Other Measuring Sys.0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 Manufacturing & Dist0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Fixed 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Mult. 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Irradiators 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Dvt.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0'
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
l UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-0 0
0 3
Other Source Mat'l 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
Special Nuc. Mat'l 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Ncn-Reactors 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 i
TOTAL:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.
0 0
1 1
l CODES FOR REGION IV: AR AEKANSAS, CD COLORADO,10- IDAHO, KS* KANSAS, LA LOU!S! ANA, MT MONT ANA, NO NORTH DAKOTA, NE* NEBRASKA, NM NEW MEXICC, OK-CKLAHOMA, SD+ SOUTH DAKOTA, TX-TEXAS, UT UT AH, WY-WYOMING l
1 l
I
Question 18f.
(continued) Enforcement Actions Aaainst Licensees located in NRC Reaion V Cateaory AK AS AZ CA GU HI NV OR WA TOTAL Academic 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
, Medical 0
0 0
0 0
5 0
0 0
5 Well-Logging 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Other Measuring Systems 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.
0 0
Manufacturing & Distrib.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Radiography-Fixed Site 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Radiography-Multiple 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Irradiators 0
0 0
0 ll 0
0 0
0 0
Research & Development 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Mills 0
0 0
0 0
0-0 0
0 0
UF Facilities 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
Other Source Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Special Nuc. Material 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-Other Non-Reactors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 i
TOTAL:
0 0
0 0
0 5
0 0
1 6
CODES FOR REGION V: AK ALASKA, AS-AMERICAN SAMOA, AZ-ARIZONA, CA-CALIFORNI A, GU-GUAM, HI* HAWAll, NV-NEVADA, OR OREGON, WA-WASHINGTON I
i L
I
0 Question 18f.
(continued) RATE PER 100 LICENSEES FOR ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AGAINST LICENSEES' BY REGION FISCAL YEAR RGN 1 RGN 2 RGN 3 RGN 4 RGN 5 TOTAL Ii FY 1990 1.0 1.8 1.0 2.5 0.7 1.2 l
l FY 1991 0.5 1.3 0.8 1.4 2.8 0.9 FY 1992 1.0 2.2 1.0 1.8 0.8 1.2 FY 1992 2
RATE BY STATE WITHIN REGION i
RGN 1 CT DC* DE* MA MD* ME NH* NJ NY* PA El* VI* TOTAL 3
0.8 4
0 0.2 0
0 0
2 2
0.4 33 2
1.0 RGN 2 Al*
FL* GA* KY* MS* NC* PR SC* TN* VA VI* WV TOTAL 4
0 0
0 0
9 4
11' 3
2 0
1 2.1 RGN 3 1A*
JL* JN M1 MN M0 Old W1 TOTAL 0
1 2
1 0
1 0.4 2
1.0 l
RGN 4 AR* CO*
10 KS* LA* MT ND* NE* NM*
OK SD* TX* UT* WY* TOTAL 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
3 0
7 0
0 1.7 RGN 5 AK*
AS* AZ* CA* GU* Hi* NV* OR* WA*
TOTAL 1
0 5
0 0
0 0
-0 0
0.7 Fewer than 100 NRC licensees The number of NRC licensees is based on the licensing region and does not include licensees for which Headquarters is responsible.
2 The number of NRC licensees in this table is based on the location of the licensees which is not always the same as the licensing region and includes licensees for which NRC Headquarters is responsible.
Therefore, the rate per region for the two tables may differ slightly.
3 Represents 1 Enforcement Action among 3 NRC licensees.
Represerts 1 Enforcement Action among 9 NRC licensees.
OVESTION 22.
A description of the systems of reciprocity, including applicable notification, fee, regulatory, inspection and enforcement requirements, for cases where licensees licensed under one Atomic Energy Act regulatory entity are allowed to perform work in a jurisdiction regulated by anotner.
(a)
Situations in which licensees of Agreement States are allowed to operate in states under NRC jurisdiction, i.e. the reciprocity system provided in 10 CFR 150.20.
]
ANSWER.
NRC regulations in 10 CFR 150.20 grant each Agreement State licensee a general license to conduct activities authorized by the Agreement State license in areas of NRC jurisdiction. This is referred to as " operating under reciprocity." These licensees may only operate under reciprocity for up to 180 days a year unless they are performing activities in offshore waters.
Licensees operating in offshore waters may continue to do so for an unlimited period of time.
When operating under reciprocity, the Agreement State i
i licensee (NRC general licensee) must comply with the same regulations that are applicable to an NRC licensee performing similar operations under NRC jurisdiction.
They must also comply with all terms and conditions of their Agreement State license unless their license is less restrictive than NRC regulations, in which case they must comply with the NRC regulations.
In general, an Agreement State licensee must submit NRC Form-241, a copy of its Agreement State license, and the required fee to the appropriate NRC Regional Office at least three days before engaging in any activities under
+w
.,y,3
.,,,,,,,--.,.mm.--
3.-,
v-yp..
,-,y.
.,,,r,
-0VESTION 22.(a)
(Continued) reciprocity.
If the licensee is not able.to do so, the NRC Regional Administrator may authorize the licensee to begin the activity by telephone.
In this case, the licensee must file the required documentation three days af ter the telephone notification.
Following receipt of the initial request, the NRC Regional Administrator may waive the requirement to file additional documentation during the remainder of the calendar year.
This does not however, release the licensee from the need to provide information on the dates and location of use to the NRC.
Internal NRC guidance states that every reasonable effort should be made to conduct inspections of Agreement State licensees operating under reciprocity at the same priority as that for an equivalent type NRC license. For example, NRC considers radiography licensees to be of highest priority for inspection.
As a result, NRC would tend to inspect radiography licensees operating under reciprocity more frequently than licensees using portable gauges, which are at a lower NRC inspection priority.
NRC has the regulatory authority to take enforcement action against NRC licensees as well as Agreement State licensees operating under reciprccity.
The type of action is based on the safety and regulatory significance of the f
violation.
It is NRC practice to inform Agreement States of any enforcement action taken against one of their licensees operating under the NRC general
- license, i
Licensees applying for reciprocity with NRC must pay an application fee for the initial request for reciprocity in a calendar year.
The licensee is not
f 2
l OVESTION 22.(a)
(Continued) j I
assessed an annual fee but is required to pay an inspection fee if the licensee is inspected by NRC while performing licensed activities under reciprocity. For FY 93 the application fee is $640. The inspection fee varies depending upon the type of activity being conducted by the licensee.
As a matter of interest, most Agreement States follow similar procedures for i
i NRC licensees operating under reciprocity in an Agreement State.
i l
1 l
l OUESTION 22.b.
(Continued) OUESTION 22.
A description of the systems of reciprocity, including applicable notification, fee, regulatory, inspection and enforcement requireme.rts, for cases where licensees licensed under one Atomic Energy Act regulatory entity are allowed to perform work in a jurisdiction I
regulated by another.
Please address the following cases.
(b)
Situations in which licensees of Agreement States conduct activities at Federal facilities located in Agreement States l
ANSWER.
l l
An Agreement State licensee may conduct activities at a Federal facility in the Agreement State provided that the area is not one of exclusive Federal jurisdiction.
If requested, the NRC Office of State Programs verifies the jurisdictional status of the area in which the Agreement State licensee will be conducting operations, i.e.,
whether the area is under exclusive Federal jurisdiction or whether the Agreement State has jurisdiction over the area.
If the area is under exclusive Federal jurisdiction, it has been the practice of the NRC to allow the Agreement State licensee to conduct activities when the Agreement State licensee files a Form
i l
l l
i OUESTION 22.b.
(Continued) 241 and pays the appropriate fee, just as if the Agreecent State licensee were working in a non-Agreement State.
NRC will make reasonable efforts to perforn inspections of such licensees.
As warranted, appropriate enforcement action will be taken by NRC.
However, this has been NRC practice notwithstanding the fact that NRC rules are silent on activities in areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction.
NRC staff is developing proposed regulations on reciprocity to state explicitly that the reciprocity provisions of 10 CFR 150 apply to licensees operating in areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction.
\\
l
{
\\
l l
l l
1 i
t
l QUESTION 22.q.
A description of the systems of reciprocity, including applicable notification, fee, regulatory, inspection and enforcement requirements, for cases where licensees licensed under one Atomic Energy Act regulatory entity are allowed to perform work in a jurisdiction regulated by another. Please address the following cases.
(c)
Situations in which licensees of Agreement States conduct activities in other Agreement States.
ANSWER.
If a licensee in an Agreement State desires to perform licensed activities in another Agreement State's jurisdiction, the licensee provides a form similar to the NRC Form 241 and provides payment of fees, if any, to the Agreement l
State regulatory program in which it intends to conduct activities. That Agreement State program will then determine whether the reciprocity licensee will conduct operations within their jurisdiction and whether the reciprocity licensee will be inspected.
The Agreement State will also handle any resulting enforcement actions taken as a result of an inspection.
!~
OVESTION 23.
Identify the number of reciprocity requests (e.g. Form 241) submitted, approved and disapproved by the NRC for each of the past five years and, to the extent practical, quantify j
the types of licensees and activities for which the requests were made.
1 ANSWER.
I j
The attached tables provide the number of reciprocity _ requests submitted, approved and disapproved by type of licensee for calendar years 1991-1993.
(A significant portion of the agency's reciprocity records for the years prior to 1991 were inadvertently destroyed during a transfer of administrative responsibilities for reciprocity.
Accordingly, we have provided data only for those _ years for which we j
have complete agency records.)
Reciprocity requests were made_by five general types of licensees: gauge licensees, radiographers, research and development licensees, service licensees, and well-loggers.
Typical l
activities conducted by Agreement State licensees under the reciprocity l
provisions of 10 CFR Part 150 include: use of portable moisture-density gauges on highway construction projects; non-destructive radiographic examination of pipelines, welds and structures; analytical studies r
associated with oil and gas exploration and other geologic work; servicing of nuclear devices such as teletherapy machines; and decommissioning and decontamination work at facilities.
i
OUESTION 23. (Continued).,
CY 91 FORM 241 SUBMITTALS APPROVALS DISAPPROVALS Gauges 175 172 3-Radiographers 305 304-1 Research & Devt.
7 7
0 Service Licensees 207 206 1
l l
Well Loggers 32 32 0
1 TOTALS:
726 721 5
j 4
I l
4 1
OUESTION 23. (Continued).
1 l
CY 92 FORM 241 SUBMITTALS APPROVALS DISAPPROVALS Gauges 194 191 3
Radiographers 391 390 1
l Research & Devt.
10 10 0
j l
Service Licensees 293 293 0
l l
Well Loggers 33 33 0
TOTALS:
921 917 4
l l
OUESTION 23. (Continued),
l CY 93 (throuch Anrin i
FORM 241 SUBMITTALS APPROVALS DISAPPROVALS Gauges 71 71 0
Radiographers 84 84 0
Research & Devt.
3 3
0 1
Service Licensees 153 153 0
Well Loggers 13 13 0
TOTALS:
324 324 0
l l
l l
l l
J OVESTION 24.
Identify and describe all enforcement actions taken by the NRC in the past five years against Agreement State licensees as a result of activities where licensees of Agreement States are allowed to operate in states under NRC jurisdiction, i.e. the reciprocity system provided in 10 CFR 150.20.
ANSWER l
l Tnere were 12 escalated enforcement actions taken by the NRC between 1988 and 1993 against Agreement State licensees where violations were issued relating to the licensee's activities conducted in states under NRC jurisdiction as described in Question 22.a.
A summary of each enforcement action is provided:
l l
1989 l
EA 88-265 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty followed by an Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty and Order to Show Cause Why License Should Not Be Suspended to Basin Testing laboratory, Inc., Williston, North Dakota, for violations involving use of radiographer's assistant to independently conduct radiographic activities, failure to notify NRC of industrial radiography operations in NRC-regulated states, and failure to provide' accurate information.
The Licensee paid the civil penalty in installments.
l l
OVESTION 24 (Continued) 2 EA 88-290 NRC issued an Order to Show Cause and Order Suspending License to American Testing and Inspection, Inc., Joliet, Illinois, for willful conduct of activities in violation of NRC requirements, false statements, knowingly and willfully violating NRC license conditions, and failure to notify NRC I
on 55 occasions of industrial radiography activities performed in NRC-regulated states. An Order Modifying License was issued requiring replacement of the RSO with an NRC-approved individual, creation of an independent organization approved by NRC to observe industrial radiography operations in NRC-regulated states, and audits of radiation safety program.
1990 i
EA 90-095 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of f
Civil Penalty to Mississippi X-Ray Services, Inc., Wesson, Mississippi, for failure to comply with a number of NRC l
requirements in industrial radiography, including the surveillance of operations, postings, surveys of exposure devices, notification of NRC prior to working in NRC-regulated states, and failure'to comply with an Order Modifying License requiring weekly notification of planned j
radiographic operations in NRC-regulated states.
The I
licensee paid a civil penalty of $7,500.
l f
o OVESTION 24 (Continued) 3 B.92 EA 92-077 NRC issued an Order suspending general license to Panhandle N.D.T. and Inspection, Inc., Borger, Texas, for failure to notify NRC (filing NRC Form 591) of intent to perform I
industrial radiography in NRC jurisdiction.
EA 92-091 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to Midwest Industrial X-Ray, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, for violations, including failure' of radiography personnel to wear alarm ratemeters, exceeding the requirement of 180 days operation in an NRC l
jurisdiction, a failure to conduct complete surveys, and I
willfulness associated with failure to wear alarm ratemeters.
The licensee paid a civil penalty of $8,000.
EA 92-099 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to Cardi Corporation, Warwick, Rhode Island, for failure to comply with reciprocity requirements in an NRC-regulated state.
The licensee paid a civil penalty of
$1,250.
EA 92-102 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of i
Civil Penalty to American Testing and Inspection, Inc.,.
i Joliet, Illinois, for repeated failure to notify NRC of industrial radiography performed in NRC-regulated states,
QUESTION 24 (Continued) 4 operating in an NRC jurisdiction in excess of 180 days, and a failure to comply with Order Modifying License. The Licensee paid a civil penalty of $15,000.
EA 92-128 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Fenalty to Nucletron Corporation, Columbia, Maryland, for failure to file with the NRC a copy of the Company's Agreement State specific license and NRC Form 241 when performing licensed activities in an NRC-regulated states.
Licensee paid a civil penalty of 52,400.
EA 92-141 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to Grinnell Corporation, Cranston, Rhode Island, for failure to comply with reciprocity requirements in an NRC-regulated state, and several other violations.
Licensee paid a civil penalty of $25,000.
EA 92-203 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to Capital Materials Testing, Inc., Ballston Spa, New York, for failure to perform an adequate survey of l
a radiographic exposure device after completion of a radiography activity.
The Licensee paid a civil penalty of
$7,500.
1993 l
l
i l
OVESTION 24 (Continued) 5 l
l EA 92-188 NRC issued a Notice of Violation to Diamond Engineering &
Testing, Inc., Lynn Haven, Florida, for conducting radiography operations in a non-Agreement State without filing the required notification to the NRC.
EA 93-048 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to Standard Nuclear Consultants, Ltd., Elburn, Illinois, for failure to notify NRC on at least 75 occasions when services comprised of instrument calibrations, leak and shutter tests, and contamination surveys were performed in NRC-regulated states.
Licensee paid a civil penalty of
$500.
There were four escalated enforcement actions (Severity Level III and above) taken by the NRC between 1988 and 1993 against Agreement State licensees where l
violations were issued relating to the licensee's activities conducted at l
Federal facilities located in Agreement States.
A summary of each enforcement action is provided:
1992 l
l l
EA 92-105 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to Metals Evaluation and Testing, Inc.,
l Oakland, California, for failure to perform an adequate l
l survey of radiography exposure devices after completion of l
(
I i
OUESTION 24 (Continued) 6 industrial radiography activities.
The Licensee paid a civil penalty of $7,500.
)
l EA 92-127 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to CTI, Inc., Martinez, California, for violations based on failures to use alarm ratemeter, conduct surveys, post high radiation areas, conduct inspections and maintenance of radiographic exposure devices and containers, j
and comply with transportation requirements.
Willfulness was associated with the posting violation.
The Licensee paid a civil penalty of $12,500.
EA 92-154 NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty to Consolidated Engineering Laboratories, l
Pleasanton, California, for violations including failures to use alarm ratemeters, provide surveillance of radiographic operations, perform surveys and training, post radiation l
areas, and comply with transportation 'tiolations.
The l
l Licensee paid a civil penalty of $5,000.
l l
EA 92-216 NRC issued a Notice of. Violation and Proposed Imposition of l
Civil Penalty to Western Technologies, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, for willful failure to wear alarm ratemeters when performing industrial radiography.
The Licensee paid a civil penalty of $8,000.
I N---- -- -
"r OVESTION 25.
Identify.and describe all investigations conducted by the Office of Investigations of Agreement State Licensees as a i
result of activities described in Items la and Ib.
j
\\
1 ANSWER.
During discussions with members of your staff, we agreed that 0! will review its cases which may be covered by this request and provide any relevant
)
information.
Since many of these cases are presently. in storage, it will take approximately.one month to complete this effort.
1 1
i
. i w
r OVESTION 26.
Identify any analyses, reports, or data conducted by, or in the possession of, the NRC identifying or describing the type, frequency, and severity of enforcement actions taken by Agreement States against licensees of other Agreement States as a result of activities described in Item Ic.
ANSWER.
The Office of State Programs does not have any reports or analyses of this nature.
Enforcement actions taken by Agreement States against their own licensees or licensees under reciprocity are reviewed by the NRC as a part of the routine review of Agreement State programs for adequacy to protect public health and safety and compatibility v'th NRC's regulatory programs. As part of the Agreement State review, states are asked to identify cases and to provido copies of enforcement actions.
This information has not been documented in terms of any reports or data collection mechanisms other than the periodic review, which concludes that the enforcement program is adequate to ensure corrective action that will be taken to protect public health and safety in the Agreement States.
l l
1 i
l I.
r
,,.