ML20045D190
| ML20045D190 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/21/1993 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Gipson D DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045D191 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9306280078 | |
| Download: ML20045D190 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000341/1993007
Text
_
-
.
JUN 211933
Docket No. 50-341
The Detroit Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. D. R. Gipson
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
6400 North Dixie Highway
Newport, MI 48166
Dear Mr. Gipson:
This refers to the engineering and technical support inspection conducted by
Messrs. I. T. Yin, Z. Falevits, and K. Salehi of this office on March 29
through June 2, 1993. The inspection included a review of activities
authorized for your Fermi 2 facility. At the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the
i
enclosed report.
Subsequent to the inspection, a telephone exit was held on
June 2,1993, to discuss additional technical and regulatory issues.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.
The
inspection focused on your control and implementation of plant design changes
and corrective actions.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies
areas examined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection
consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records,
,
'
observations, and interviews with personnel. The purpose of the inspection
was to determine whether activities were authorized by the license were
conducted safely and in accordance with NRC requirements.
Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice.
Although 10 CFR 2.201 requires you to submit to this office, within 20 days of
your receipt of this Notice, a written statement of explanation, we note that
Part b. of this violation had been corrected and those actions were reviewed
during this inspection. Therefore, no response with respect to Part b. is
required. With regard to Part a. of the enclosed Notice of Violation
(Notice), the violation is of concern because it identified a weakness in your
engineering evaluations of water hammer events.
l
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
f
9306280078 930621
[#
ADOCK 0500034.1
0
'
}
,
)
,
.
.
_
.
.
..
The Detroit Edison Company
2
JUN 211993
actions you plan to prevent recurrence.
After reviewing-your response to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
,
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
C6GNAL ENED BY T. Q M AP,TR{
,
T. O. Martin, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Safety
.;
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-341/93007(DRS)
cc w/ enclosures:
John A. Tibai, Supervisor of
Compiiance
P. A. Marquardt, Corporate
Legal Department
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspector, RIII
James R. Padgett, Michigan
Public Service Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Monroe County Office of
Civil Preparedness
_
Fermi LPM, NRR
i
W. Hodges, RI
A. Gibson, RII
S. Collins, RIV
K. Perkins, RV
bcc w/ enclosures:
PUBLIC-IE01
RIII
RIII
TIT
RIII
RIII
RIII
RIII
[ ----- see previous page for concurrence ---- ]
p\\
Yin /cg/jk
Falevits Salehi
Burgess
Phillips Lange
TMartin
06/16/93
06/ /93 06/ /93 06/ /93 06/ /93 06/ /93 06/o/93
_ _
..
._
.
t
,
The Detroit Edison Company
2
,
i
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to'this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results ~of future
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will. be placed
'
in the NRC Public Document Room.
!
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
requl red by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
T. O. Martin, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
1.
't
2.
Inspection Report
+
No. 50-341/93007(DRS)
cc w/ enclosures:
John A. Tibai, Supervisor of
Compliance
P. A. Marquardt, Corporate
-
Legal Department
OC/LFDCB
'
Resident Inspector, RIII
James R. Padgett, Michigan
'
Public Service Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Monroe County Office of
t
Civil Preparedness
Fermi LPM, NRR
W. Hodges, RI
.'
A. Gibson, RII
S. Collins, RIV
K. Perkins, RV
bcc w/ enclosures:
PUBLIC-IE01
9
RIII
RJIf',-
I
Fl1RI /
Rillr ,
R
RI)}ih
Iyhf
,
y
Cf,IItv
.J
i
I
Yiri c4/jk
Fa1
ts
St. eh"i'
Ifurgess
P
lips
L
TMartin
/
06/l>/93 06/[/93 06/ /93
06/16/93
06/(b /93 06/b/93 06/i4/93
- .
- -
- - -
=
.-
+ 'r