ML20045A831
| ML20045A831 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20045A825 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-93-16, NUDOCS 9306150043 | |
| Download: ML20045A831 (1) | |
Text
y
.~
APPENDIX A E
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Entergy Operations, Inc.
Docket No. 50-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 License No. NPF-38 During an NRC inspection conducted on April 4 through May 15, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part-2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 6.8.1.c requires that written procedures be established, implemented, and maintained covering surveillance and test i
activities of safety-related equipment.
Section 3.2 of Surveillance Procedure OP-903-005, Revision 7, " Control Element Assembly Operability Check," requires,.in part, that, if any control element assembly (CEA) is noted to be immovable at any time during the performance of the test, then refer to Off-Normal i
Procedure OP-901-102 "CEA or CEDMCS Malfunction."
Contrary to the above, on May 11, 1993, operators failed to refer to Off-Normal Procedure OP-901-102, upon determining that part-length CEA 28 was immovable during the performance of Surveillance Procedure OP-903-005.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (382/9316-01).
i Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.201, Entergy Operations, Inc.,
is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S..
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
f' 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV,'611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps l
that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that j
will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full i
compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where t
good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Arlington, Texas, thisf.Adayof u u__-1993 9306150043 930609 PDR ADOCK 05000382 G
.-