ML20045A427
| ML20045A427 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/1993 |
| From: | William Cahill, Woodlan D TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| TXX-93227, NUDOCS 9306100241 | |
| Download: ML20045A427 (2) | |
Text
4 a,
p 4
~
1 k
,,,,,,,, =
Log # TXX-93227 4
1.
File # 10130 C
r IR 92-30 1UELECTRIC June 3, 1993 William j. Cahill, Jr.
i Grournw Pumlent U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 t
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WEAKNESS IN CPSES FITNESS-FOR-DUTY PROGRAM REF:
1)
NRC letter from A. B. Beach to William J. Cahill, Jr.
dated August 17, 1992 2)
TV Electric letter logged TXX-92436 from William J. Cahill, Jr. to NRC dated September 16, 1992 3)
NRC letter from L. J. Callan to William J. Cahill, Jr.
dated April 28, 1993 Gentlemen:
In the letter to TV Electric transmitting NRC Inspection Report Nos.
50-445/92-30: 50-446/92-30 (Reference 1), the NRC discussed an inspector identified weakness in the implementation of the CPSES Fitness-for-Duty Program.
The weakness ir.<olved the potential for early notification of some CPSES employees selected for random drug testing while working backshifts.
TU Electric responded to the NRC regarding this weakness in its letter of
.i September 16, 1992 (Reference 2).
Subsequently, NRC Region.IV requested additional, more specific information concerning TV Electric's corrective.
actions for this weakness (Reference 3).
In response to the NRC request, changes made to CPSES procedures to ensure notification confidentiality are documented in CPSES Procedure Change Notice PCN-STA-910-R2-2.
This PCN added specific notification instructions to Station Administrative Procedure STA-910 (Rev. 2), " Fitness-For-Duty-Program".
Procedure STA-910, section 6.8.4 " Selection and Notification 'of.
Testing Dates and Personnel", was' revised to provide additional instructions for supervisors to ensure notification confidentiality.
The subject PCN was-approved August. 27. 1992 and became effective September 9, 1992.
)
} h
[jf; %
- 9306100241 930603
- /~ '
.PDR.ADDCK 05000445.
400 N.Otive strees LB. 81 DStas, Texas 75201 0
PDR~
= -
>s?~
b o
o 4TXX-93227 Page 2 of 2 j
f In addition to the PCN to procedure STA-910, the Department Manager of the personnel involved in the observed weakness instructed his supervisors on the correct method for notifying individuals of random testing without jeopardizing the " unannounced" aspect of testing.
Other departments which may require notification of personnel under similiar circumstances (i.e.,
personnel working backshif ts) were evaluated with respect to.the' observed notification weaknesses; no other instances of the weakness were found in other departments.
Finally, the proper method for notifying individuals'_ of random drug / alcohol testing was emphasized in Fitness-For-Duty Supervisor Training.
Should you have any further questions with respect to this matter, please
-contact Mr. James Brown. Fitness-For-Duty Coordinator, at (817) 897-8912.
Sincerely..
William J. Cahill, Jr.
By:
D. R. Woodlan Docket Licensing Manager CLW/grp c-Mr. J. L. Milhoan. Region IV Mr. A. B. Earnest Region IV Resident Inspectors. CPSES (2)
Mr. T. A. Bergman NRR Mr. B. E. Holian, NRR I
t l
e