ML20044G753

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-482/93-16 on 930510-13.Violations Noted
ML20044G753
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/26/1993
From: Beach A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Withers B
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
Shared Package
ML20044G754 List:
References
EA-93-129, NUDOCS 9306040205
Download: ML20044G753 (5)


See also: IR 05000482/1993016

Text

i

u

UNITED STATES

[Da afo ,%

  • '

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

nEcioN av

j

3

. g

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400

og *"" f

AR LINGTON, TEXAS 760118064

MAY 2 61993

Docket No. 50-482

License No. NPF-42

EA 93-129

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

ATIN:

Bart D. Withers

President and Chief Executive Officer

P.O. Box 411

Burlington, Kansas 66839

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-482/93-16

This letter refers to the special inspection conducted by Messrs. S. J.

Campbell and G. A. Pick of this office for the period of May 10-13, 1993. The

inspection included a review of activities authorized for your Wolf Creek

Generating Station.

At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were

discussed with you and those members of your staff identified in the enclosed

report.

The area examined during the inspection is identified in the re;0rt...Within

this area, the inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and

representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations of the-

activities in progress.

Based on the results of this ins,3ction, six apparent violations were

identified and are being considered for escalated enforcement action in

accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC

Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C.

Accordingly, no Notice of Violation is presently being issued., for these

inspection findings.

Please be advised that the number and characterization

of apparent violations described in the enclosed inspection report may change

as a result of information developed during the enforcement conference or

further NRC review.

The first apparent violation was the failure to comply with the Technical

Specification requirements for having the motor-driven auxiliary feedwater

pumps operable when entering Mode 3 from Mode 4.

This violation is

significant because two critical safety-related components, necessary for the

removal of residual heat from the reactor, were inoperable because their

capability to start automatically was disabled.

The second apparent violation was the failure to take the actions required by

the Technical Specifications with both motor-driven auxiliary feedwater pumps

inoperable in Mode 3.

This violation occurred as a result of the first

violation and the failure of your normal reactor operations oversight and -

administrative controls to identify the inoperable components for an extended

9306040205 930526

PDR

ADDCK 05000482

G

PDR

~

.

.e

.

.

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-2-

'

Corporation

time. While we recognize that the turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pump was

available and that the motor-driven auxiliary feedwater pumps could have been

placed in service in a short time, if needed, this violation is significant

because it indicates inadequate attention to and cognizance of vital safety-

related equipment status by licensed operators.

The third apparent violation involved a failure to follow procedures in

accordance with the requirements of Technical Specifications.

This apparent-

violation is of concern because control room operators failed to perform a

mode change checklist prior to entering Mode 3, which resulted in Mode 3 entry-

with both motor-driven auxiliary feedwater pumps inoperable. We are concerned

,

that this violation may have resulted from pressure on the licensed operators

,

to meet a schedule goal.

The hurried preparations for Mode 3 entry may have

'

resulted in incomplete reviews of plant conditions, equipment status, and

associated documentation.

-

The fourth and fifth apparent violations involved failures to adequately

perform procedures in accordance with the requirements of Technical

Specifications. These apparent violations are of concern because control room

operators did not perform adequate briefings or control board walkdowns during

shift turnover, did not perform adequate control board walkdowns during shift

,

operations and, as a result, did not recognize that both motor-driven

auxiliary feedwater pumps were inoperable for a period of greater than 13

hours. Had effective shift turnovers been conducted, appropriate reviews of

'

equipment status during the night shift been conducted, or normal oversight

processes functioned effectively, the second apparent violation would have

been prevented.

The sixth apparent violation involved a failure to adequately perform an

administrative procedure in accordance with the Technical Specifications. The

plant operators failed to use the equipment out-of-service loo to track the

status of the inoperable auxiliary feedwater. pumps.

Proper use of this

administrative control method could have prevented the significant violations

discussed above.

Failure to use the administrative tools provided removed a

backup safety net intended to prevent such errors.

An enforcement conference to discuss these apparent violations has been

scheduled for 1 p.m., on June 9,1993,-in the Region IV office.

This

enforcement conference will be open to public observation.in-accordance with

,

the Commission trial program as discussed in the enclosed Federal Register

notice (Enclosure 2). The purposes'of this conference are to discuss the

examples of apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to

provide you the opportunity to point out any errors in our inspection report;-

to provide an opportunity for you to present your proposed corrective actions;

and to discuss any other information that will help us determine the

appropriate enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy.

In

particular, we expect you to address the safety significance of- operating .in

Mode 3 with both motor-driven auxiliary feedwater pumps inoperable. You

should also address the reasons the handswitch misalignment was not noticed

.

!

!

.

.

.

-

.

-

t,

4

.

.

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-3-

,

Corporation-

o

and corrected for more than 13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> after Mode 3 entry and why the equipment-

out-of-service log was not used as a tool to assist in tracking inoperable

'

equipment.

In addition, this is an opportunity for you.to provide any

information concerning your perspective on: . (1) the severity of the issue,

.

(2) the factors that the NRC considers when it determines the amount of.a

,

civil penalty that may be assessed in accordance with Section VI.3.2 of the-

Enforcement Policy, and (3) the possible basis for exercising discretion in

accordance with Section VII of the Enforcement Policy.

You will be advised by-

separate correspondence of the results of our deliberations on this matter.

No response regarding the apparent violations is required at this time.

In accordance with 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice,"'a

copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public

Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

)

.

.

ri Bil$ Beach, Director

f

g Division of-Reactor Projects-

Enclosures:

1.

NRC Inspection Report

50-482/93-16 w/ attachment

2.

Federal Register Notice

cc w/ enclosure:

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.

,

ATTN: Otto Maynard, Vice President

Plant Operations

,

P.O. Box 411

Burlington, Kansas ' 66839

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge

ATTN: Jay Silberg, Esq.

.

2300 M Street, NW

Washington, D.C.

20037

Public Service Commission

ATTN:

C.' John Renken

.

Policy & Federal Department

P.O. Box 360

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102

,

.:

4

.

.

. ..-

.

. ..

-

- .

.

i

_ . ,

H

.

.

'

.

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-4-

l

Corporation

' ;

~

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.

ATTN: Regional . Administrator, Region III

l

799 Roosevelt Road

<

Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.

!

ATTN: Kevin J. Moles

.;

Manager Regulatory Services

!!

P.O. Box 411

.

Burlington, Kansas 66839

-Kansas Corporation Commission

a

ATTN: Robert Elliot, Chief Engineer

Utilities Division

1500 SW Arrowhead Rd.

I

Topeka, kansas 66604-4027

,

1

Office of the Governor

,

State of Kansas

-j

Topeka, Kansas 66612

. ,

3

Attorney General

,

1st Floor - The Statehouse

.

Topeka, Kansas 66612

-

Chairman, Coffey County Commission

'

Coffey County Courthouse

Burlington, Kansas 66839-1798

Kansas Department of Health -

and Environment

'

Bureau of Air Quality & Radiation

.

Control

'

ATTN: Gerald Allen, Public

>

Health Physicist

Division of Environment

Forbes Field Building 321

,

LTopeka, Kansas 66620

Kansas Department of Health and Environment

':

ATTNi Robert Eye, General Counsel

i

LS0B, 9th Floor

900 SW Jackson

!

-

I

Topeka, Kansas 66612

-;

n

!

'

, :-

f

-

I.

.e.e

-

s

-

,

r-

w

--

m

~

_>

.- '

- ~

.

-Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-5-

MAY 2 61993

Corporation-

,

i

M 35EDMBT(IE14) O

bec-distrib. by RIV:

e

J. L. Milhoan

Resident. Inspector

Section Chief (DRP/A)

'DRP

DRSS-FIPS

Section Chief-(RIII, DRP/3C)-

RIV File

SRI, Callaway, RIII

MIS System

RSTS Operator

Project Engineer (DRP/A)

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB_4503

DRS

Chief, Technical Support Section -

R. Wise, Allegations Coord. (2)

G. F. Sanborn, EO

-

J. Lieberman, OE (MS: 7H5)

W. L. Brown, GC

SRIs, Region IV

J. Gilliland

>

- 3

h

>

'

>

.

.

!

,

i

-

,

r

RIV R DRP/

Sd :

/A

C:DR A

D.

P

'

'

SJCampbell

GAPick

WDJohnson-

rn

A

ach-

'

5/19/93

5/19/93

5/gtt/93

5/yy93-

5/tf/93

.

030082

I

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

-5-

MAY 2 61993

Corporation

bcc to DMB (IE14)

bcc distrib. by RIV.

J. L. Milhoan

Resident Inspector

Section Chief (DRP/A)

DRP

DRSS-FIPS

Section Chief (RIII, DRP/3C)

RIV File

SRI, Callaway, RIII

MIS System

RSTS Operator

Project Engineer (DRP/A)

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF, MS: MNBB 4503

DRS

Chief, Technical Support Section

R. Wise, Allegations Coord. (2)

G. F. Sanborn, E0

J. Lieberman, OE (MS: 7H5)

W. L. Brown, GC

SRIs, Region IV

J. Gilliland

f~

eY

' 3.c\\

RIV:RI:DRP/D

SRl:DRP/A

C:DR /A

504k

,

,

D.

P

SJCampbell

GAPick

WDJohnson

aES[nb6rn

A B_ach

5/19/93

5/19/93

5/ git /93

5///93

5/tp/93

.