ML20044D015
| ML20044D015 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/2020 |
| From: | Victor Hall NRC/NRR/VPOB |
| To: | |
| Jennivine Rankin EX. 1530 | |
| References | |
| EPID L-2019-LLA-0235, LAR-19-018 | |
| Download: ML20044D015 (4) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 174 TO FACILITY COMBINED LICENSE NO. NPF-92 DOCKET NO.52-026 Replace the following pages of the Facility Combined License No. NPF-92 with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Facility Combined License No. NPF-92 REMOVE INSERT 7
7 Appendix C to Facility Combined License No. NPF-92 REMOVE INSERT C-111a C-111a C-111b C-111b
(7) Reporting Requirements (a)
Within 30 days of a change to the initial test program described in UFSAR Section 14, Initial Test Program, made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 or in accordance with 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix D, Section VIII, Processes for Changes and Departures, SNC shall report the change to the Director of NRO, or the Directors designee, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59(d).
(b)
SNC shall report any violation of a requirement in Section 2.D.(3),
Section 2.D.(4), Section 2.D.(5), and Section 2.D.(6) of this license within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. Initial notification shall be made to the NRC Operations Center in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72, with written follow up in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73.
(8) Incorporation The Technical Specifications, Environmental Protection Plan, and ITAAC in Appendices A, B, and C, respectively of this license, as revised through Amendment No. 174, are hereby incorporated into this license.
(9) Technical Specifications The technical specifications in Appendix A to this license become effective upon a Commission finding that the acceptance criteria in this license (ITAAC) are met in accordance with 10 CFR 52.103(g).
(10) Operational Program Implementation SNC shall implement the programs or portions of programs identified below, on or before the date SNC achieves the following milestones:
(a)
Environmental Qualification Program implemented before initial fuel load; (b)
Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program implemented before initial criticality; (c)
Preservice Testing Program implemented before initial fuel load; (d)
Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program implemented before initial fuel load; (e)
- 1.
The fire protection measures in accordance with Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.189 for designated storage building areas (including adjacent fire areas that could affect the storage area) implemented before initial receipt 7
Amendment No. 174
C-111a Amendment No. 174 Table 2.2.2-3 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria No.
ITAAC No.
Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria 7.b) The PCS wets the outside surface of the containment vessel.
The inside and the outside of the containment vessel above the operating deck are coated with an inorganic zinc material.
i) Testing will be performed to measure the outside wetted surface of the containment vessel with one of the three parallel flow paths delivering water to the top of the containment vessel.
i) A report exists and concludes that when the water in the PCCWST uncovers the standpipes at the following levels, the water delivered by one of the three parallel flow paths to the containment shell provides coverage measured at any elevation between elevation 266 ft. and the spring line that is equal to or greater than the stated coverages.
- 24.1 +/- 0.2 ft above the tank floor; at least 90% of the perimeter is wetted.
- 20.3 +/- 0.2 ft above the tank floor; at least 72.9% of the perimeter is wetted.
- 16.8 +/- 0.2 ft above the tank floor; at least 59.6% of the perimeter is wetted.
ii) Inspection of the containment vessel exterior coating will be conducted.
ii) A report exists and concludes that the containment vessel exterior surface is coated with an inorganic zinc coating above elevation 135'-3".
iii) Inspection of the containment vessel interior coating will be conducted.
iii) A report exists and concludes that the containment vessel interior surface is coated with an inorganic zinc coating above the operating deck.
7.c) The PCS provides air flow over the outside of the containment vessel by a natural circulation air flow path from the air inlets to the air discharge structure.
Inspections of the air flow path segments will be performed.
Flow paths exist at each of the following locations:
- Air inlets
- Base of the outer annulus
- Base of the inner annulus
- Discharge structure 7.d) The PCS drains the excess water from the outside of the containment vessel through the two upper annulus drains.
Testing will be performed to verify the upper annulus drain flow performance.
With a water level within the upper annulus 10" +/- 1" above the annulus drain inlet, the flow rate through each drain is greater than or equal to 525 gpm.
C-111b Amendment No. 174 Table 2.2.2-3 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria No.
ITAAC No.
Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria 7.e) The PCS provides a flow path for long-term water makeup to the PCCWST.
ii) Testing will be performed to measure the delivery rate from the long-term makeup connection to the PCCWST.
ii) With a water supply connected to the PCS long-term makeup connection, each PCS recirculation pump delivers greater than or equal to 100 gpm when tested separately.
- 9. Safety-related displays identified in Table 2.2.2-1 can be retrieved in the MCR.
Inspection will be performed for retrievability of the safety-related displays in the MCR.
Safety-related displays identified in Table 2.2.2-1 can be retrieved in the MCR.
10.a) Controls exist in the MCR to cause the remotely operated valves identified in Table 2.2.2-1 to perform active functions.
Stroke testing will be performed on the remotely operated valves identified in Table 2.2.2-1 using the controls in the MCR.
Controls in the MCR operate to cause remotely operated valves identified in Table 2.2.2-1 to perform active functions.
10.b) The valves identified in Table 2.2.2-1 as having PMS control perform an active safety function after receiving a signal from the PMS.
Testing will be performed on the remotely operated valves in Table 2.2.2-1 using real or simulated signals into the PMS.
The remotely operated valves identified in Table 2.2.2-1 as having PMS control perform the active function identified in the table after receiving a signal from the PMS.
11.a) The motor-operated valves identified in Table 2.2.2-1 perform an active safety-related function to change position as indicated in the table.
iii) Tests of the motor-operated valves will be performed under preoperational flow, differential pressure, and temperature conditions.
iii) Each motor-operated valve changes position as indicated in Table 2.2.2-1 under preoperational test conditions.
11.b) After loss of motive power, the remotely operated valves identified in Table 2.2.2-1 assume the indicated loss of motive power position.
Testing of the remotely operated valves will be performed under the conditions of loss of motive power.
After loss of motive power, each remotely operated valve identified in Table 2.2.2-1 assumes the indicated loss of motive power position.
139 2.2.02.07b.ii Not used per Amendment No. 112 140 2.2.02.07b.iii Not used per Amendment No. 112 141 2.2.02.07c Not used per Amendment No. 112 142 2.2.02.07d Not used per Amendment No. 112