ML20043H526

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for May 1990 for Nine Mile Point, Unit 2
ML20043H526
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point 
Issue date: 05/31/1990
From: Saunderson R, Joseph Willis
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NMP55598, NUDOCS 9006260062
Download: ML20043H526 (5)


Text

.I NMP55598

+-

NINE MILE POINT-UNIT t'P O. BOX 63, LYCOMING, NY 130937ELEPHONE (315) 343 2110 June 14, 1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document and Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

Operating Statistics & Shu'down-May 1990 c

Docket No. 50-410 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 Dear Sir Submitted herewith is the Report of Operating Statistics and Shutdown for May 1990 for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2.

Also included is a narrative report of Opesration Experience for May 1990.

Very truly yours, James L.

General Superintendent JLW/psc Enclocures y

xc:

Regional Administrator, Region 1 W. A. Cook, Resident Inspector OY 0

9006260062 900531

/,9 POR ADOCK 05000410 l

R PDC s

t

l-i

)

r

.(

0PERATtNC D ATA REPORT 50-410 dp 00CKET NO.

DATg 6/4/90 R.

SaunderSon COMPLETED SY TELEhloNE 315-349-2696 OPERAflNC STATUS N#8e*

(1) Item 21 YTD based N4"" "41" P 4"t Unit 2 on YTD NMDC 1077.1

l. Unk Name:

5/1/90 tbru 5/31/90

2. Repoeting Permd:

3323

3. Licened Thermal Power (MWt):

(2) Item 21 cumm not avail; 1214

4. Nmnepiste Rating (Cree Mw ):

Cumm NMDC not determined e

1091

$. Design Electriest Rating (Not MWe),

11 " 4

6. Manimum Dependable Caposisy (Cros MWe):

t 1076 1

7. Masimum Dependable Caposity (Net MWe):
4. If Changes occur in Caposity Ratings (Items Nwnber 311uough 7) Staes Last Report Ciw Reemas:

(

Items 6 & 7 recalculated monthly when oneentine at ryater thnn nr enun1 en 80% licensed core thermn1 onvr.v_

None

9. Power Level To Which Restricted. if Any (Net MWe):

N/A 1

10. Ra'assas For Restrictions.If Amy.

O This Month Yr..to.Dete V.

Camulattw

(

)

744 3623 19999

!!. Hours in Reporting Period 0"$.9 2492.4 10680.9 '

12. Number Of Hosa: Reestor Was Cntical 0
13. Reactor Reurve shutdown Hours 410.7 2390,2 10019
14. Hours Generosor On.Line 0

0 0

15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 1167987.4 7278343.99,74660396.7 l&. Cross Thurmal Energy wersted IMwHI
87. Cross Electrical Energy Generated (MWHI 386,0,1 M,

2443267.5 9747242,5 353977.8,

2266822.8 9015847.8

15. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 65.97 53.04 5 5. a',,

55,2 65.97 53.04

19. Unit service Factor
20. Unit Aveitability Factor 44.21 58.09(1)

N/A (2)

21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Neil 43.61 57.35 43.75
22. Unit Capsody FactorIUsing DER Neil ti l.. R 34.03 24.88
13. Unit Forced Outage Race
24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Ness a Months iType.Date.and Duration of Esen t-Refuel. 8/17/90, 14 weeks
25. If Shut Dawn A End of Report Period. E>timated Dsie of Sisrtup: -

Achiesed Forrensa 26, Units in Test Status (Pnne to Cesenmercial Operationi:

b/23/07 INiilA l. CRITICAL.li )

8/8/87 INI TI41. ELECTMICITY 4/5/88 C0\\t\\1ERCI Al. Ol't H A TION to/77

a--

e.

L--

APPENDIX 3 AVERAGE DAILY UNTT POWER LEVEL

,O DOCKET NO. 50-410 UNIT m2 l

p DAR 6/a/on COMPLETED BY R.

Satmderson TELEPHONE 315-349-2696 MOM

-May 1990 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWeNet)

(MWeNet) 1061

-27 g

7 2

106R gg 35

,j 3

1069

-24 gg 1042

-22 4

g

-5 908 q

21

-22 l

1013

-24 j

M

=

22 i

1072

-26 7

g3 i

a 1063 24

-26 1054

-26 26 1057

-28 10 gg 6

11 1052' Zy

-34 12 1058

-6 gs 13 Ino 29 Mo 14 937 30 219 15

~33 184 31

-30

'i gg.

I INSTRUCTIONS On this form. list the average da0y unit power level in MWe Net for sach day in the reporung month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

V. O th ris' -ai6 4'a">*<

a<'i-

's."'<x's 4r46i

=xi.

(

used for the net electrical rating of the unit. there may be oc:asions when the daily average power level exceeds the 100% line (or the restricted power tent litiet in such cases. the average daily urut pawer wiput sheet should be foot'noted to explatn the apparent anomah.

l.164 n

.e.s

,.~-n.-

-n~<

7 -

e 4

80 UNIT SHUIDOtfMS AfD FOtfER RESUCTIOf05 DOCEET88f9.

i lifGT NA80E MP2 DATE 6/4/90 l

REPOSit00f8880 May 1.990 CoperLETEs ey R. Saunderson TE8.EfWggE 315-349-2696 i

i 1

s:

5_e 2!3 I35 "

f*.

g Csees & C.wenee.e.

~

N...

Iseer g

g?

=

i5c E. eses p

mw o

oE al jdig Rer=e *

    • u t'

r.,,,wgu m,

6 i

9003 900514 F

333.3 A

2 9009 LD N/A Reactor manually scrammed from approximately 45% CTP (licensed) in response to rapidly decreasing l

condenser vacuum due to a t

malfunctioning offgas system as a l

result of partial loss of Instrument

[

Air System (1AS) due to pipe failure caused by stress-corrosion cracking of red brass piping. Removed and replaced the failed pipe, performed visual inspection of other piping in.the area, all one and two inch l

red brass piping in the area was

~

i also replaced. Review ongoing to determine need for replacement of l

piping with different material.

l i

j i

i i

3 4

l F. F. wad Reasan:

90eshed:

Enlatit G-Oneseeae6ms

5. Lt.cJule.t A 1.pseenscw failene tE metaisal Iseen.sg
f. F sei

.f Dee.

I R Meisseesessece ai Test 2 teemaal konse.

Esseer f e theewee r Ref.elsag 3-Aeo=es.sioec Lesen.

E* esse Repuse ILERS rise gMUREG-88 Itegales.nr Reseeksi.as 4 Delme(Empis6sl 9068I I fircems e Teainiseg a liaesesc I masemisemoluse I A.s 6ees,e6*e 5

Geg me

.II..

tl'epissal Ealsibie I-Smesc 5 wou l

I ef;7) i'Ilehre"I~arianoI i

)

V o

t i

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT #2 NARRATIVE OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE Nine Mile Point Unit 2 operated with a capacity factor of 44.21% (MDC - net) and an availability factor of 55.2% during the month of May 1990.

On May 14. Operations at Nine Mile Point Unit 2 initiated a manual reactor scram by placing the mode switch in " SHUTDOWN" in response to loss of Main Condenser vacuum due to a malfunctioning offgas system caused by failure of an Instrument Air System (IAS) pipe.

The unit remained shutdown (off-line) until May 28.

(Refer to LER 90-09 for details).

There were no challanges to safety relief valves during this reporting period.

I l'

,