ML20043G632

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-01 & 50-370/90-01.Corrective Actions:Memo Issued Reemphasizing Importance of Frisking & Outlining Frisking Requirement & Personnel Counseled Re Completing Required Documentation
ML20043G632
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  
Issue date: 06/05/1990
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9006200509
Download: ML20043G632 (4)


Text

~*.

.v..

flu B h sn Ouke 1%urr Company

\\1re President

  • J 1;0 Box 331M Nuclear Production Charlotte, N C N242 (704)373-4511 1

DlJKE POWER June 5, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369, 370 Inspection Report Nos. 369, 370/90-01 Reply to a Notice of Violation Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 10CFR.201, please fihd attached.Duka Power Company's response to Violation 50-369, 370/90-01-02 and 50-369, 370/90-01-04 for the McGuire Nuclear' Station.

Should there be any questions concerning this matter, contact W. T. Byers at (704) 373-6194.

m

- Vecy t ruly yours, -

l*46.On Wc llal B. Tucker WTB/189/lcs Attachment xc:

Mr. S. D. Ebneter Regional Administrator, Region II O. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta St., NW,'Suitu 2900 Atlanta,' Georgia 30323 Mr. Darl llood U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. P. K. VanDoorn NRC Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station 9006200509 900605 POR ADOCK-05000369 y \\ k Q

PDC

/

,w

'4.

Pago 1 of 3 McGuire Nuclear Station Response to Violation violation 50-369.370/90-0(-01 Technical Specification (TC) 6.11 requires procedures for personnel radiation protect.'on be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR 20 and be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation protection.

Radiation Protection Manual section 2.3' contamination control, Revis.t.on (Rev.) 23, dated November 11, 1989, requires that all personael exiting from LAdiologically controls areas.(RCAs) must frisk p'rsonal items such as hardhats, notebooks, and flashlights.

Contrary.to the above, during the week of March 12, 1990, approximately 50 percent of 20 workers observed exiting the 774 foot elevation of the Unit 2 Auxiliary Building RCA failed to perform an individual radiation survey of personal items, for example hardhats.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement IV).

Response

(1)

Admission or denial of the alleged violation:

McGuire admits the violation.

(2)

Reason for the. violation:

Without addicional information (identification of personnel involved), the specific reason (s) for the violation cannot be isolated.

We do not believe that this is a training deficiency as this topic is covered thoroughly in initial and refresher training for all personnel with unescorted access.

(3)

The corrective steps which have been taken The Station Manager sent a memorandum to al. station 1

personnel (dated March 29, 1990) re-emphasizing the importance of frisking along with outlining tl.e frisking requirement.

Additionally, the frisking policy was revised to allow personnel to keep their hard hats on when entering the PCM-1 Monitor.

This eliminates the need to separately frisk hard hats.

Page'2 of 3 c'

(4)

The corrective steps which will be taken to avoid future violations.

No further actions are considered to be necessary.

(5)

The date When full compliance will be achievedi McGuire is presently in full compliance.

Violation 50-369/370/90-01-04 TS 6.11 requires procedures for personnel radiation protection be prepared consistent-with the requirements of 10 CFR 20 and be approved, maintained and adhered to for-all operations involving personnel radiation protection.

Radiation Protection Manual, Section 3.4, ALARA Pre-job and Post-job Evaluation, Rev. 1, dated September 15, 1989, requires documentation of pre-job ALARA evaluations including work hour / dose rate reduction methods for each activity; and adjusted work hours, exposure estimates, and pre-job meeting minutes.

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to maintain adequate documentation of pre-job Reactor Coolant pump (RCA) ALARA activities conducted.in association with the Unit 2, End of Cycle Six (U2-EOC6) refueling outage.

This is a severity Level V violation (supplement IV).

Response

(1)

Admission or denial of the alleged violation:

McGuire admits the violation.-

(2)

Reasons for the alleged violationt Due to Unit-1 beginning its refueling outage two months earlier than scheduled, overall job pre-planning meetings-were broken down into smaller task evaluations.

Meetings were held with work crews, ALARA personnel, and Technical Staff to discuss dose reduction and work practices, though the ALARA plans were not properly ~ documented.

(3)

The corrective steps which have been taken:

The personnel responsible have been counseled on the importance of completing the required documentation.

(4)

The corrective steps which will be taken i

Pago 3 of 3 4

The Radiation Protection Manual, Section 3.4, is currently being revised to clarify the ALARA process and responsibilities within the process.

ALARA related sections of the RP Manual are being consolidated and will be reviewed for a possible station-w'.de ALARA manual / program.

(5)

Data who's full compliance will be achieved section 3.4 of the manual will be revised and the appropriate sections of the manual will be consolidated, reviewed,-and appropriate documents revised by August 31, 1990.

i