ML20043E213
| ML20043E213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/26/1990 |
| From: | Carr NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Bevill HOUSE OF REP., APPROPRIATIONS |
| References | |
| BEVILL-900326, CCS, NUDOCS 9006120171 | |
| Download: ML20043E213 (1) | |
Text
_
pest l
MR. BEVILL:
There has been discussion with regard to the need for a certification for the nonnuclear balance of plant design.
What are your views with regard to a certification for the i
balance of the plant?-
CHAIRMAN'CARR:
In April 1989, the NRC promulgated 10 CFR Part 52. The intent of this rule was i
to provide for the early resolution of licensing issues and enhance the safety and reliability of nuclear power plants. This-regulation requires applications for certification of a nuclear power plant design which is an evolutionary j
u:
change from existing light water reactors to provide an essentially complete nuclear power plant cesign, except for site-specific elements such as the l
service water intake and the ultimate heat sink.
The Commission believes that-l this is' necessary to receive the full benefit from the certification process --
I early resolution of issues and enhanced safety and reliability.
Long experience in operating light-water designs has demonstrated the potentially adverse safety effects the balance of plant can have on the nuclear island. Given this i
4 t
experience, certification of these designs should be based on a consideration of the whole plant, or else the certifications of those designs will lack that
' degree of finality which the Comission ' intended in promulgating 10 CFR Part 52.
I i
3 The final rule provides the opportunity for certification of designs of less ll than complete scope, if they belong to the class of advanced designs.
- However, I-
. certification of an advanced design of incomplete scope will be given only after I
showing, using a full-scale prototype, that the balance of plant cannot significantly affect the safe operation of the plant.
,e l
l l
$h$$
900326 BEVILLoo&
Li p
PDC Question 9/Bevill/NRR-q 03/26/90