ML20043C796

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Electrical Distribution Sys Functional Insp Repts 50-266/90-201 & 50-301/90-201 on 900312-16 & 0326-0406. Weaknesses Noted Re Functionality of Electrical Sys & Lack of Available Design & Engineering Info
ML20043C796
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  
Issue date: 06/01/1990
From: Holahan G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20043C797 List:
References
NUDOCS 9006060187
Download: ML20043C796 (4)


See also: IR 05000266/1990201

Text

_

_ .

. . _ - _ _ _ _ ._

_ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _

_ _ - .

,

.

'

[ptog\\,

,

'

.

UNITED STATES

,.

{

g

NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION

( ' " * * ,[!

.

W ASHINGT ON, D. C. 20555

5

Oune 1, 1990

Docket Nos. 50-266

and 50-301

Mr. C. W. Fay, Vice President

Nuclear Power

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

,

231 West Michigan Street - P379

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201

i

Dear Mr. Fay

l

SUBJECT:

ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL INSPECTION AT

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; REPORT NUMBER

50-266/90-201 AND 50-301/90-201

We are forwarding)the report of the electrical distribution system functional

inspection (EDSFI

conducted by the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

during March 12 through 16 and March 26 through April 6, 1990. This EDSF1 was

]

one of several pilot inspections performed in accordance with an NRC Inspection

1

Manual draft temporary instruction entitled " Electrical Distribution System

i

Functional Inspection." The inspection team consisted of NRC Heacquarters and

J

Region 111 personnel and five consultants.

l

The inspection was performed to determine whether the electrical distribution

system as designed installed, and ' configured at i'oint Beach Nuclear Plant,

Units 1and2,wouldbecapableofperformingitsintendedsafetyfunctions.

During the inspection, the team r6 viewed available calculations and supporting

documents for this system at your Nuclear Power Department offices in Milwaukee

and at the Point Beach plant and conducted system walkdown inspections. The

team also reviewed other activities associated with the electrical distribution

,

system at the Point Beach plant.

The team identified weaknesses regarding the functionality of your electrical

!

systems. The three issues that raised the most concern were (1) apparent

emergency diesel generator (EDG) loading exceeding the EDG ratings under

(2) portions of the EDG fuel oil system were not

certainaccidentscenarios(3) safety-relatedcableswereroutedinthesame

seismically designed, and

raceways as were cables of the redundant division. These three issues and a

number of significant team findings were discussed during the exit meeting,

which was held at Wisconsin Electric Power Company's Milwaukee offices on

April 17, 1990. During that meeting, WEPC0 discussed the actions it had taken

insnediately following the inspection to resolve many of the findings.

By means

of reviews, evaluations, and system modifications, WEPC0 alleviated the NRC's

immeciate operability concerns for the three major issues.

As a result of the inspection, the team identified four general areas of weak-

nesses and numerous technical deficiencies. The areas of weaknesses the team

identified were (1) design and modification deficiencies in the EDG and 125-Vdc

systems (2) lack of available design and engineering information, (3) design

features where a single failure can disable redundant equipment, and

i

(4) engineering support that did not fully evaluate design or changes to

design.

)

$886%Bk8788888166

(I

Q

PDC.

T

'

i

.

Mr. C. W. Fay

-2-

June 1, 1990

While planning corrective actions based on the weaknesses identified in the

enclosed report, it is important that you realize that the focus of this

inspection was only on the electrical systems. Therefore, consideration

should be given to identifying and correcting similar problems in other

safety-related systems. Given the nature and importance of our inspection

findings, we expect to closely follow these and other corrective actions you

may take to assure improvement is sustained.

We recognize that you have already taken or plan to take corrective actions

relating to several of our concerns including undertaking a design basis

reconstitution effort, installing an additional emergency diesel generator, and

hiring additional engineering support staff. You have initiated nodifications

to electrical distribution systems, such as separation of offsite power sup-

plies to address weaknesses identifico in your own reviews. We have received

your letter of May 10, 1990, which reflects the information presented at the

April 17, 1990 exit meeting, describing steps you have taken or plan to take to

address the inspection findings presented at our exit neeting.

Any enforcement actions that result from this inspection will be forwarded by

the NRC Region 111 office under separate cover.

>

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this

letter and the enclosure noted below will be placed in the NRC Public Document

Room.

Please respond to this office within 60 days to inform us of the date that

actions taken related to the items identified in the enclosed inspection

report will be completed for possible followup inspection.

Should you have any

questions concerning this inspection, please contact the NRR Project Manager,

Warren Swenson, at (301) 492-1386, or the inspection team leader,

StevenR. Stein,at(301)492-0977.

Sincerely,

l

Original signed by:

Gary M. Holahan, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Projects 111/lV/V

and Special Projects

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

.

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report 50-266

i

l

and 50-301/90-201

l

cc w/ enclosure: See page 4

Distribution:

See page 3

  • see previous concurrence

RSIB:DRIS*

RSIB:DRIS*

RSIB:DRIS*

Rlll*

SC:RSIB:DRIS*

SRStein:bt

JBJacobson

GEGarten

RAWestberg

SCGuthrie

05/24/90

05/24/90

05/24/90

05/30/9

05/25/90Yf

2

M

C:RSIB:DRIS*

D

WDLanning

imes

JHolahan

05/24/90

(/90

@// /90

.

.

..

-

.

_ _ _ _ . . .

.

.

,

..

f --

- j

.

e

Mr. C.~W. Fay.

-3-

~ June 1, 1990

'

,

Distr'bstion:..s .,

,...,..y

pocken. riles-50-266 andl50-301?

RSIB R/F

DRIS R/F

,

TEMurley, NRR

- FJMiraglia, NRR

WTRussell, NRR

RKGrimes, NRR

HArAming, NRR

d'<.t:".irie , NRR

SKStein, NRR

GMHolahan, NRR-

WHSwenson, NRR

JAZwolinski, NRR

JNHannon, NRR

JEDyer, EDO

RLSpessard. AE0D

CVanderniet, SRI Point Beach

- Regional Administrators

Regional Division Directors

!

Inspection Team

LPDR

PDR

ACRS(3)

OGC(3)

~

..

,

'"

IS Distribution

5

i

e

e

@

.

_

_ . . _ . _

_

~

l

,

,

Mr.-C. W. Fay ~

-4-

' Point Beach Nuclear Plant

Wisconsin- Electric Power Company.

Units 1-and 2

cc:

,

- Ernest L. Blake, Jr.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge

'

2300 N Street,'N.W.

Washington, DC 20037

i

Mr. James J. Zach, Manager

- Point Beach Nuclear Plant

t

- Wisconsin Electric Power Company

6610 Nuclear Road

Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241

'

Town Chairman

.

- Town of Two Creeks

>

Route 3

Two Rivers, Wisconsin 54241

Chairman

Public Service Commission

of Wisconsin

,

Hills Farms State Office Building

Madison, Wisconsin 53702

Regional Administrator, Region 111

!

U.S; Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

Office of Executive Director

'

for Operations

.

799 Roosevelt Road-

1

'e # I' lyn,-Illinois' 60137

- Sesider; Inspector's Office

'

U.S. Uedeur Regulatory Comission

,

00<.2 4de' ear Road

it.9 #tvara, Wisconsin 54241

'.

t

1

i

d