ML20043A583
| ML20043A583 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 05/14/1990 |
| From: | Wright G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Igyarto D CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9005220277 | |
| Download: ML20043A583 (2) | |
Text
(yCp I~
~
- .y.
.p b
ge NM it m3 m
1
-Docket No. 50-440.
Docket,No. 50-441~
f
'The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company ATTN: 'Mr. 0 avid:Igyarto Training Manager Perry Nuclear Power Plant 10 Center Road
. Perry, OH: 44081:
Dear Mr. 'Igyarto:
Thank you.for again inviting Region III to participate in the semi-annual, meetings'of the Midwest Nuclear Training Association.
I believe the exchange of. information at these meetings is very beneficial.
J n going over the April 27, 1990 meeting, I realized that I erred on a response l
I to a question. - An individual asked whether questions on Part A (static simulator) of the_ written exam dealing:with procedures (e.g., "In accordance with station procedures, what : actions would you take if....?") were appropriate.
I
' answered that as long_ as the individual had to. synthesize data from the simulator that procedure related questions were acceptable. While questions dealing with.
. integrated plant. operations may require reference to procedures, my answer-was.
incorrect and conflicted with information I provided earlier in the meeting.
t To clear up any confusion.in this area, the-following is a discussion of what is appropriate for questions associated with Parts A and B of the written 1
examination.'
Part A'is designed to place the operator in his/her operational environment and evaluate his/her knowledge of plant systems, integrated plant operations, and-instrumentation and control systems.
Recognition of Technical Specification.
(TS): Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCO) entry and the operator's ability to determine and/or predict the effects of postulated events are
.al.so appropriate areas for evaluation.
In addition, operationally oriented-theory is valid and the use of facility charts / curves is encouraged.
It should be noted that systems oriented questions couched in operating / emergency / abnormal. procedures, e.g., "while implementing procedure
, instrument / component fails. What is the expected response of
?" are acceptable.
}
Part B-is; distinct from Part A in that the operator is presented with hypothetical circumstances including details of relevant parameters from which the operator must determine the appropriate procedural selection and implementation..These circumstances will include emergency, abnormal, r
normal and administrative procedure implementation as well as Technical Specifications and the Emergency Plan. The operator will be evaluated on the interpretation and/or use of procedural direction, guidance and information.
j8P2ggggggggp j
gp29%
~
F w
4 4
al:n : wQf.lbY,',
p
., z.
L
' :n C+
~
vAy: 1 t 1G E 1The'ClevelandlElectricLI11uminating-2 3.3
- Company
~
W E
Toensurethatal[ individuals' attending'themeetingunderstand-thisissue,eI-would appreciate it; _if you would: distribute: copies off this clarification to -
E
_....all attendees.-
71.iook forward to' participating in future MitTA meetings.-: In-the mecn' time, if;
- .you have any7 questions please contact me at -(708) 790-5695 C',
Sincerely,.
OEGmA1. S!GiiEB By GE0ffREY C. MIGl(L 3
Geof f rey. C..' Wright, ' Chief' Operations _ Branch; ga
."g.,-
cc:
K. E. Perkins, NRR U "'
iT. M. Burdick, Region III
~
4 M. J.LJordan, Regi.on 111 n
+
- .}
i t
y_
i.)
n J
L 4
il t
b_ "l b
t
[i i
o I'.);;
p - il - '
4 11 ~
4 W ig /jk n05/14/90 3
i
. If h k'
+5(
p g,- i. -- -
,t
-