Text

Performance Indicators,Mar 1990, Monthly Rept
	ML20042H004
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	03/31/1990
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20042H003	List: LIC-90-0408, Fowards Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators,Mar 1990, Monthly Rept; ML20042H004;
References
	NUDOCS 9005170038
	Download: ML20042H004 (118)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

MARCH, 1990 C-N s

i 3 pg L a,! L_ sport + _b ...)..i. 4" / / Prepared by: Production Engineering Division System Engineering 00*$00$$ $08Sd>Ses R PDC

t t OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT f FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS t i PREPARED BY: PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SYSTEM ENGINEERING 9 ? MARCH, 1990

e a 4 m a - m... d & uaw: lam wnd eswnd judgmuni... d w w ofdurn, m-farty corrvrndmoni... i a w a m 4 ep...a w d.cng a ja i upAl & /1444 term, m tern. Jt A Orvner.-dowhd, rtal %,wdl sj erhd puwuw, d w sur o<m udj wodA-A l Wnd $1b f Wnd sGlI)lntII 'WL anh W hi cm / nom Seng (Ac wpAl fattd of pursm, vtaljust On. do0ng L ught (Abny. p - 9. o'c - ~ l l l-

TABLE OF CONTENTS P84 Distribution.................... iv Preface...................... 1 Purpose...................... 3 Scope....................... 4 Adverse Trend Report................ 5 IndextoSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP) Indicators.. 6 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs........ 8 Performance Indicator Graphs............ 13 Escalated Enforcement History........... 87 Significant Items of Interest........... 91 Definitions.................... 92 Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goals................ 105 Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates... 107 Production and Operation Records......... 109 Data Source............,...... 110 References.................... 113 9

DISTRIBUTION V. W. Anderson M. O. Gautier W. L. Neal R. L. Andrews J. T. Gleason J. B. Newhouse W. R. Bateman L. V. Goldberg M. W. Nichols K. L. Belek D. C. Gorence C. W. Norris A. D. Bilau R. E. Gray J. T. O'Connor B. H. Blome M. J. Guinn W. W. Orr C. N. Bloyd R. H. Guy L. L. Parent J. P. Bobba R. M. Hawkins T. L. Patterson C. J. Brunnert M. C. Hendrickson G. R. Peterson M. W. Butt R. R. Henning R. L. Phelps R. H. Cagle K. R. Henry S. C. Presler C. A. Carlson J. B. Herman T. M. Reisdorff G. S. Cary G. J. Hill A. W. Richard J. W. Chase K. C. Holthaus T. J. Sandene G. R. Chatfield B. A. Howard B. A. Schmidt A. G. Christensen L. G. Huliska S. T. Schmitz

0. J. Clayton R. L. Jaworski F. C. Scofield R. P. Clemens R. A. Johansen B. A. Schmidt R. G. Conner J. Y. Johnson L. G. Sealock J. L. Connolley v

f. Jones H. J. Sefick G. M. Cook e

r. Kecy J. W. Shannon M. R. Core J. Keppler R. W. Short P. J. Cotton O. D. Kloock C. F. Simmons S. R. Crites D. M. Kobunski E. L. Skaggs D. W. Dale G. J. Krause F. K. Smith R. C. DeMeulmeester L. J. Kripal R. L. Sorenson R. D. DeYoung J. B. Kuhr D. E. Spires D. C. Dietz L. T. Kusek K. E. Steele D. E. Dirrim R. C. Learch W.

Steele K. S. Dowdy R. E. Lewis H. F. Sterba J. A. Drahota R. C. Liebentritt R. K. Stultz T. R. Dukarski C. J. Linden G. A. Teeple R. G. Ellis B. R. Livingston M. A. Tesar R. G. Eurich J. M. Lofshult P. L. Thompson H. J. Faulhaber J. H. MacKinnon J. W. Tills M. A. Ferdig G. D. Memoran D. R. Trausch J. J. Fluehr J. W. Marcil P. R. Turner V. H. Frahm N. L. Marfice J. M. Uhland F. F. Franco D. J. Matthews C. F. Vanecek H. K. Fraser J. M. Mattice L. P. Walling J. F. W..Friedrichsen T. J. McIvor J. M. Waszak R. M. Fussell R. F. Mehaffey W. O. Weber S. K. Gambhir R. A. Miser G. R. Williams J. K. Gasper K. J. Morris S. J. Willrett W. G. Gates D. C. Mueller P. A. Yager R. J. Mueller i iv

PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i REPORT IMPROVEMENTS Six indicators in the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report have been changed. One of these indicators is in the Maintenance Section, two of these indicators are in the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section, two of these indicators are in the Material and Outside Services Section, and one of these indicators is in the Quality Assurance Section. The Procedural Noncomoliance 'ncidents (Maintenance) Indicator found on L page 35 has been changed. This indicator now shows the number of identified Maintenance Incident Reports (IR's) that are related to the use of procedures during the reporting month and the number of Maintenance procedural noncompliance IR's closed for the corresponding month in which the IR's were opened. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive their cause codes. IR's receive their cause codes when they are being closed. l The Secondary System ciem"stry Indicator found on page 40 has 'been changed. The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is now calculated using three parameters. The three larameters used include; cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. These new parameters are being used starting with January,1990, so that the CPI can be internationally compared. This international comparison also includes the separation of plants using morpholine for pH control. The Warehouse Returns *ndicator found on page 61 has been changed. This indicator now shows the percentage of the following items compared to the total number of warehouse issues for the reporting month. These items include; the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns. The Exoedited Purchases Indicator found on page 63 has been changed. l This ind'cator now s1ows the percentage of expedited purchases compered to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month. The Number of Personnel Erro as Reoorted in LER's Indicator found on page 72 has been chan "his indicator now shows the number of l Licensee Event Reports (ged.LER's) identified during the reporting month l event date. Previously, this indicator showed the number of LER's which l were actually written during the reporting month.- The bottom graph of the Liouid Radioactive Waste Beina Discharaed to the Environment Indicator found on page 50 has been changed. This graph now shows the volume of radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks. The top graph still shows the number of curies released from all sources, 1

PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED) Six indicators have been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report. Two of these indicators have been added to the Maintenance Section, one of these indicators has been added to the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section, and three of these indicators have been added to the Quality Assurance Section. The Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resultino n Licensee Event Reoorts Indicator found on page: 37 has been added. Th's indicator shows the number o" missed Surveillance _ Tests (ST's) which resulted in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to track missed ST's for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumbers60and61. The Maintenance Effectiveness lnticator found on page 39 has been added. This indicator was deve' opec following guide 1<nes set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory (Comission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of 0)erational Data NRC/AEOD). The Maintenance Effectiveness Indi.:ator slows the number of Nuclear Plant Reliability )ata System (N?RDS) components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in a twelve-month period should incicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance, regardless of the plant mode. i The Radiolonical Work Practices Prooram Indicato found on page 48 has been added to the Performance Indicators Report. This indicator was added to track radiological work performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 52 and shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWP's)whichwereidentifiedduringthereportingmonth. The Cumolative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (Twelve Month Runnina Tota' ) lndicator found on lage 82 has been added to the Performance Indicators Report. This ind< cator shows the total number of violations - and non-cited violations (NCV's) which were identified during the last twelve months. The Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports Lndicator found on page 84 has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report. This indicator shows the number of overdue Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization for the last six months. The Corrective Action Reports Current Status Indicator found on page 85 has been added to the Performance Indicators Report. This indicator shows the number of CAR's that are older than six months and the number of CAR's that are less than six months old broken down by organization for the last six months. i l j 1 PURPOSE l I 1 This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's f personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress. toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing f and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. f I.- .,p. _,--,,%3,

=. SCOPE In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program Select the data which.most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas. i Present the data in a straight forward graphical format [ using averaging and smoothing techniques. Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison. 7 Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate. Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people-using the report. 1 a !

ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that is defined as an Adverse Trend is one in which the current month's data has more deficiencies than the data presented two months prior. Corrective Maintenance Backloo Greater Than 3 Months Old 4 (Non-Outaae) - Page 30 Even though the corrective maintenance backlog greater than three months old (non-outage) decreased in March,1990, deficiencies are still shown in this area. The -increases in the corrective maintenance backlog greater than three months old are due to Maintenance's attention being directed toward activities associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. Maintenance overtime Indicator - Page 34 The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours has been increasing. This increase is due to increased maintenance activities associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. i i __. - d

) j SAFETYENHANCEMENTPROGRAM(SEP) I PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators j pages is to list the indicators related to the SEP items with parameters that can be trended. SEP Reference Number 15 - Increase HPES and IR Accountability PAgt Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........ 35 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations............. 46 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate............. 71 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's.......... 72 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations issued.versus LER's Reported 86 l SEP Reference Number 20 - Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, Improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported.......... 86 SEP Reference Number 21 - Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional l Inspections CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported.......... 86 SEP Reference Number 24 - Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level......................... 74 SEP Reference Number 26 - Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for i Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling Injury Frequency Rate......-.......... 21 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate............. 71 SEP Reference Number 36 - Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order Backlog (CorrectiveNon-OutageMaintenance) ..............36 SEP Reference Number 41 - Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............ 31 i Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue.............. 32 I i l ; ..,,..e..

l \\ SAFETYENHANCEMENTPROGRAM(SEP) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINUED) SEP Reference Number 44 - Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........ 35 SEP Reference Number 52 - Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program............... 48 l SEP Reference Number 54 - Complete Implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program l i Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............ 19 Volume of low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste........... 20 O Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations............. 46 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................ 47 SEP Reference Number 58 - Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)............ 51 Security Incident Breakdown.................. 51 Security System Failures.................... 53 SEP Reference Number 60 - Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports..................... 37 SEP Reference Number 61 - Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports..................... 37 SEP Reference Number 71 - Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications l' Temporary Modifications 67 1 l l l / =-

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS j INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS f Forced Outage Rate....................... 13 i Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical........ 14 Unplanned Safety System Actuations............... 15 Gros s Heat Rate......................... 16 Equivalent Availability Factor................. 17 l Fuel Reliability Indicator................... 18 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............ 19 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste........... 20 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................. 21 h { ) w I i -r e ? >

f I PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) t OPERATIONS Forced Outage Rate....................... 13 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical........ 14 I Unplanned Safety System Actuations............... 15 Gross Heat Rate......................... 16 Equivalent Availability Factor................. 17 Fuel Reliability Indicator................... 18 Daily Thermal Output...................... 22 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours.........-23 Operations and Maintenance Budget................ 24 Document Review......................... 25 ' MAINTENANCE I Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands)..-......... 26 Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands)............ 27 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders........... 28 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown................ 29 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old.......... 30 l Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............ 31 i Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue.............. 32 l Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments........ 33 Maintenance Overtime...................... 34 l Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)... 35 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage)..... 36 Number of Surveillance Tests Resultin Licensee Event Reports....... g in 37 .g.

1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED) i i Number of Nuclear Plant Reliabilit Reportable Failures.........y Data System (NPRDS). J 38 Maintenance Effectiveness.................... 39 l CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION f Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............ 19 ) Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste........... 20 Secondary System Chemistry................... -. 40 i Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit.... 41 i + Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits.... 42 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service.......... 43 i Hazardous Waste Produced.................... 44 t Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure............... 45 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations............. 46 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................ 47 Radiological Work Practices Program............... 48 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.. 49 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.. 50 t SECURITY Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)............ 51 Security Incident Breakdown................... 52 i Security System Failures.................... 53 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts.............. 54 Spare Parts Inventory Value................... 55 Spare Parts I ssued....................... 56 1 2 4, ~.

h \\ ? . PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)_ MATERIAL AND OUTSIDE SERVICES (CONTINUED) Inventory Accuracy...............-........ 57 Stockout Rate.......................... 58 Warehouse Receipts....................... 59 Warehouse I ssues..................... -... 60 Warehou se Return s........................ 61' Material-Requests Awaiting Approval................:62 Expedited Purchases...... -.................. - 63 I nvoi ce Breakdown.................... -..... 64 Material Request Planning.................... 65 DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications.................... 66 Temporary Modifications..........._........... 67 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Priority Breakdown..... 68 Engineering Change Notice Status......_......-..... 69 Engineering Change Notice Breekdown............... 70 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Disabling Injury Frequency Rate................. 21 ^ Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate............. 71 HUMAN RESOURCES Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs............ 72 Personnel Turnover Rate................. '.... 73 - Staffing Level..............-............ 74 1

i PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS-(CONTINUED) TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION SRO License Examination Pass Ratio..... :.......... 75 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio................ 76-License Candidate Exams..................... 77 Hotlines.:...... 78 Classroom (Instructor)Pches....-.s ,.........79 Total Hours of Student Training................. 80-OVALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection. Hours.......... 81 Cumulative-Violations'and Non-Cited Violations (NCV's)..... 82 Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months'01d...........'83 Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports.......... 84 Corrective Action Reports Current Status.......-..... 85 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus.......-. 86' NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported 4 9 e L 1 L. - -

l - Forced Outage Rate 6 G-Fort Calhoun Geal .i Industry Upper 10 Percentile i 5-GOOD 4-4 R a t 3-j e j i 2-O'--' O--- G----O---G--- --- G --- O ---O --- G----G ---O l i 1.4 I1-i 0 0 0 '87 '8889 A r-M y Jn J1 Alig Sp 0t Nv 0c Jn Fb Mr 1989 1990 i FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was not reported for the month of March, 1990, due to the 1990 Refueling Outage. The last < forced outage at Fort Calhoun occurred in September of 1989. The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.0%. The 1990 goal for forced outage rate is 2.4% i and is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1990 performance goals can be found on page 105. Adverse Trend: None

4 f 5- . Reactor Scram G-Fort' Calhoun Goal -G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-l S 3 GOOD c r + a m 2-q l 1-G-- -- G-- -- s----G-- -- G---- G ----G ---- G ---- O ----O ----O ----O 2:

C 0

-0 0 0 0 C C m '86 '87 '88 '89 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec Jan Feb Har 1989- '1990-t UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRIT,1QL s .There were no. unplanned automatic reactor scrams in March. It has-been 1,368 days since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram - ~ which occurred'on July 2, 1986. The 1990 goal for unplanned automatic reactor-scrams while critical has been set at 1. The industry upper ten percentile value is 1 zero scrams per-unit on an annual basis. The ~ Fort Calhoun. Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area. Adverse Trend None I

Safety System Actuations G-Fort Calhoun Goal -G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile A c t a GOOD k + o n s-o----e.---e....e....e-...O----O --- G---- Q -l a i \\, \\ 0 0 0 's '87 '88 '89 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov ~Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 I 11NPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS j i There were no unplanned safety system i actuations during the month of March, 1990. 1 The 1990 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. This goal is ' based on past performance at the Fort Calhoun Station. The industry upper ten percentile,value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. Adverse-Trend: None l 1 l t i.

l' I IMonthly Gross Heat Rate - Year to Date Gross Heat Rate O-Fort Calhoun' Goal-Industry Upper 10 Percentile l GOOD i 10750-l 4 10520 B 10500- ~ U 10270 W 10250-H e-s -- o---.e---e -- o---e---.e---e--- g---g---.e 10014I 10000- e" E B-9 O O O - O -O -G - G-- O-9 0 '87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec 1990 -l .i GROSS HEAT RATE The-gross heat rate for the: Fort Calhoun Station was reported as zero i BTU /KWH' due to the 1990 Refueling

Outage, j

The 1990 year to date gross heat rate i value is 10,459 BTU /KWH. The 1990 goal is 10,200 BTV/KWH. The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,989 BTU /KWH. Adverse Trends: None 'l i .I

I IMonthly EAF ^ - 12 Month Average EAF G-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD -G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100- ,g_

g. _.g

_g._g_e

g. _g7a

-'\\g _ 77 80-O~ t 66 g 0,..,,0,, G,,",G, _,,&",,0,, ,G,,,,G,,,,O ~ 60-N e y 40-l 20- { 0 '87 '88 '89 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ' Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 i EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR'- The Equivalent Availability Factor _ (EAF) was. reported as 0.0% for the month of March.- The EAF was reported as zero due to the plant being shutdown for the 1990 Refueling Outage. i The 1990 EAF goal is 65.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 75.6%. The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%. Adverse Trends: None 1 ' )

1 -I 5- .,,. Fuel Reliability Indicator G-Fort Calhoun Goal -& Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-n a n 3 0 3-t u GOOD 5 + e A r 3 a p m 1-O----G--- G ---& ---&---G--- G--- G---O --- O --- G ----O .13 0 n -n n n n m -n n --n n 0 '87 '88 '89 Apr May Jun ju'l A'u'g S'e'p. Oc't Nov D'ec Ja'n Fe'b. Mar 1989 1990-L FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was not reported.for-the month of March. The FRI is-not reported if.the plant is below 85% power operation.- The Fort' Calhoun Station. was shutdown during the month of March, 1990,cdue to the 1990 Refueling Outage. The 1990 fuel reliability goal has been set.at -1.0 nanocuries/ gram. The fuel reliability indicator industry - upper ten percentile value is 0.07 nanocuries/ gram. When the Fort Calhoun Station was shutdown for refueling, it was i operating. in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator Adverse Trend:- None

I ^ Personnel Radiation Exposure 388' 400 G-Fort Calhoun Goal -G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile GOOD 300-272- + O p..-O.. 4... e -- & - **... e. - R E 200- . P i M O----& -O / O--G--C 0- - G -G-- O-G - O j. 6 93.4 l100- / / j ,0 / 0'"' '.87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr. May Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 t I PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE 1 (CUMilLATIVE) During March,.1990, 80.8 man-rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel,while working at:- the Fort Calhoun Station. The' increase. in personnel exposure was due to increased activity in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated with' the 1990 Refueling Outage. The monthly - cumulative exposure goal for March was 125.8 man-rem while the actual cumulative . exposure through March totaled 99.0 man-rem. i" The personnel radiation exposure industry upper l ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year, i This indicator tracks radiological practices for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumber54. Adverse Trend: None.

.i I l Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500- - Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped G-Fort Calhoun Goal e Industry' Upper 10 Percentile 10000-c- r u y GOOD c 7500-4 6195 F. ' It 5000-e e O---- e----e ---G---s---e---+---G----o---s----O --- O 4454 2500-O j l '87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec. 1990 t VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE t i The above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount ~ of. waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus the. change in-inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for bur al.- Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet): Amount Shipped in March 660.0 Amount in Temporary Storage 750.5 1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped 818;1 4 1990 Goal 5000.0-f The industry upper ten percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic' feet per unit J per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the-upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,19% and 1988. This indicator tracks-radiological practices fer Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)'ItemNumber54. Adverse Trend: None V

i 1 2-1990 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate -X-1989 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate -1.75-5 Year Average Disabling Injury Frequency Rate G-Fort Calhoun Goal 1.5- -G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.25-R GOOD a 3 1 t e 4 .75- '5 ~, 'N x e......e....e... ....o 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec March 1990 DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator shows the current monthly _ disabling injury rate-in i column form. The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate and the Fort-Calhoun Station 5 year average disabling injury frequency rate are i l also shown. There were zero-disabling injuries reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in March. The total number of disabling injuries in 1990 is zero. I The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and l was based on one disabling injury occurring in 1990. .The industry up)er ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 0%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator. The year end disabling injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and l 1989 were 0.6, 1.6, and 0.4 respectively, i This indicator tracks personnel performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 26. l Adverse Trend: None,

-+- Thermal Output - Technical Specification Limit -& Fort Calhoun Goal 15 0 0 c - - - - - - - - - - - 7 1000-a w / t t 500-0: March 1990 l' DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt-average technical specification limit,.and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross. hatched area represents the difference between the rav.imum allowable operation and the actual plant operation. The percent - power operation of - the Fort Calhoun Station for the month of March was reported as 0.0%. The 0.0% power operation of the plant was due-to the plant being shutdown for the 1990 Refueling Outage. Adverse Trend: None .,m

1- -M-Equipment Forced Outage Rate .8- .6-GOOD R l + a t '.4 L .2-i .13 0 0 0 '87 '88' '89 Jan - F'eb. Mar Apr May' Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov.Dec 1990 E0VIPME)T FORCED OUTACES P ER 1000 CRITICAL HOU IS The equipment forced outage hours were unobtainable for the-month of March due to the 1990 Refueling Outage. I The last - equipment forced outage occurred in-September of 1989 and was due to a cable problem with-the resis tive -temperature detector on reactor coolant pump motor RC-3A. Adverse Trend: None 4

1 i 'l - Actual Operations Expenditures 125- -M-Operations Budget i gy100-I i 1 d 75-lo i r 11 1 ol 50-na sr s. 25-4 0 Jan Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 40- - Actual Maintenance Expenditures l Maintenance Budget [ M 30-i 1d U 20-o1 na s r 10-s f 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul .Aug Sep 'Oct Nov Dec 1990 L OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual' expenditures for-operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station. The budget year to date-for Operations was 23.4 million dollars for March t while the actual cumulative expenditures through March totaled 20.0 million dollars. The budget year to date for Maintenance was 7.9 million dollars for March while the actual. cumulative' expenditures through March. totaled 6.3. million dollars. i Adverse Trends: None t I

1 500- ..+- Documents Scheduled for Review -X-Documents Reviewed-l Overdue Documents J L 400-p X D 300-bu j 1 L em + F, + re l\\ n 200. f /\\ \\ j .o t ! \\ I t I fs \\ l'. \\ l j, \\ i / / s ' 'N,\\ , 'e 100-f ,g %g.',, ',,,.. -%p .) t s y f (y ~ 4 f g, W M \\%g,/ X s, 'q,._4.--e',,,' Apr May Jun Jul .Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec' Jan Feb -Mar p 1989 1990 a l 1 i DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator-shows the number of biennial' reviews completed during i the reporting month, the nuir.ber of biennial reviews: scheduled for the - reporting month, and the numbei 31 biennial-reviews that'are overdue. These document reviews are-performed in house :and < include : Special. Procedures ~, the-Site Security Plan,.. Maintenance Procedures,_ Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual.- The: documents included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders,' the Technical-t Data Book, the Radiological'EmergencyJ Ressonse Plan' Emergency / Plan' u Implementing Procedures,: Operating Procecures, Emergency Operating: Procedures, Abnormal-Operating Procedures, Operating Instructions, the Radiological Protection Manual, the-Chemistry Manual, the Fuel. . Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures.; During March there-were 101 document ' reviews completed while 91-document, reviews were scheduled. At the end of March, there were 69. document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of March consisted primarily of maintenance documents. + During the month of March there ~ were 75 -new or renamed documents [ reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to: be. reviewed-again in~1992. l L Adverse Trend: None ,.f t

i 1 100-l Diesel Generator No. 1 98- -X-- Diesel Generator No. 2 4 e-Fort Calhoun Goal 96-i - .. e.....s....s ....s.....q....e....s......e..... e...._q>.....e-.... e 94-X X x. y /,..X X--X -i N,y_. y .y y. y 92-P e 90-r C e 88-n. ^ 86-GOOD 84-82-80 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep -Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar' 1989 1990 DG RELIABILITY l LAST 100 OEMANDS t 1 Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent j reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands. Diesel generator D-2 has a 94 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands. The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel p generator reliability is 95%. Presently l D-1 meets this goal. Adverse Trend: None l ! i

Diesel Generator No. 1 ~ -X-Diesel Generator No. 2 l -G-Fort Calhoun Goal 100-4 95- @---- G----- e ---- s ----G----- e ----e ---- G----- e -----e-- --- e --- -- e -P N / \\ / P-x / . 90-h---X .t n ^ t GOOD 85-t 80 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan' 'Feb Mar 1989 --1990 DG RELIABILITY LAS" 20 DEMANDS Diesel - generator -D-1 has not had a failure in the last 20 - demands on. the unit. The= present reliability factor for D-1~ is 100% over the last 20 demands. Diesel generator D-2 has: had one failure in l the last 20 demands. D-2 has a 95% reliability factor over the last 20 demands.- The Fort Calhoun -goal for -the diesel generator reliability - for the last 20 demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 and diesel D-2 presently meet this goal. l Adverse Trenj: None

) i 1 400-January 1990 l E February:1990 l -l March 1990 [ 300-t I a. h 1 200-n- g-0 - g 3 100-0- 0-3 3-6. 6-9 9-12 >12 Age in Months ( l l AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS' (CORRECTIVE-NON-0UTAGE) This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders- (MWO's) remaining open at. the end of the reporting-month. l l' Adverse Trend:- None d. I i a E I, . ~..

h ~ January 1990- = = February 1990 I IMarch 1990 e 400 200-0- B= B-j Total Open Total' Open Open Open_ 'MW0s Open Safety-High MW0s > 3 Months Safety Related Priority' Old Related MW0s MW0s MW0s > 3 Months Old. }l6J,NTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE) This indicator shows the total number: of corrective non-outage MW0's remaining open at the end of - the reporting month-along with a breakdown by.several key categories. Adverse Trend: None 4 ! l

- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old + Industry Upper Quartile j 80-60-i P r 0 -- 0 0 -O O + 0 0 .O O O -O-c 40 e n t GOOD 20-E O Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 r CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD l-(NON-0UTAGE) l ~ This indicator shows. the ^ percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at'the end of the-reporting month.-- The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are greater.than three uonths old at the end of February was-reported.as 58.9% ~ The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is i L 44.1%. Adverse Trend: Even though the corrective maintenance backlog greater than three months old. decreased in March,1990, deficiencies are still -shown in this area. The increase in the backlog since December, 1989, are due to Maintenance's attention being directed toward activities associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. g !

a - Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance i + Industry Upper Quartile n 90 G-Fort Calhoun Goal 80-70-P 60- ^ ^ ^ ^ - -- f- -- - f.- -. - _ - -Q- - --, --- --Q - -- ^- - - ^- - f ----. f f e 1 n 50-t. /\\ 40-GOOD 30-20 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb-Mar 1989 1990 i RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-0UTAGE) i The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator.shows the v,atio of completed non-outage-preventive maintenance' to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to ~ total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station increased to 76.6% in March. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%. The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of-preventive to total maintenance is 57.4%. The Fort ( Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper l quartile of nuclear power plants in this-area. This indicator. tracks preventive maintenance performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item i l Number 41. Adverse Trend: None L l ;

-i ? - Preventive Maintenance' Items Overdue 20-4-Industry Upper Quartile G-Fort Calhoun Goal 15-P e GOOD r c 10- + e n t 5- @._ _ _ _.Q _ ___ @__ _ _ _ Q .Q___ _ _ Q. _ __ _ Q __ ___$ ___ __Q _ - Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov' Dec Jan ~ Feb Mar 1989 1990 4 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to = monitor progress in 'the ' administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of-preventive maintenance' items overdue indicates a station ~ commitment to the preventive maintenance program. and _ an ability to - plan, schedule, _ and perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require. The preventive maintenance items overdue value1 was not reported for. the month of February and March - 1990, due to the problems involved with scheduling PM activities. These i problems stem from the-fact that 'the. system window concept and P/2 scheduling do not follow the normal PM scheduling program. Some PM activities may 'not be - performed, as scheduled, because the system window may not be open. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less: than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.5%. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumber41. 4 Adverse Trend: None, 4

1 l E Total Control-Room Instruments Out-of-Service kG Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month 35-1 IOut-of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month 4-Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments 30 G-Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments L 25- =i 20-GOOD - 10-y.. 0-Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar a 1989 1990 l NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE l CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the total number of out-of-service control, room instruments at the end of the reporting month, the number of out-of-service control room instruments that were corrected during the reporting month,-and I the number of control room instruments that.were added to the out-of-service control room instruments list during the reporting month. There was a total of 21 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of March. During the month of - March, 15 out-of-service instruments were corrected and 25 instruments were added to the out-of-service -instruments list. The increase in the number of out-of-service control room instruments was due to the high number of control room instrument calibrations-being performed during the 1990 Refueling 0utage. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments. The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 9. i Adverse Trend: None. y.. .-.o,

1 0- - Maintenance Overtime -K-12 Month Average G-Fort Calhoun Gcal 60-GOOD p + s e /g/ r 40-C O-----G ---- G ----- O ---- e ----e ---- &---- G ----- O -----O 's' e n-t

i 20-O Apr May Jun Jul

.Aug Sep_ Oct Nov Dec Jan 'Feb Mar 1989 1990 i 1 i l l. MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with - the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to. fatigue. The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 36.4% during the month of March, 1990. l The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 17.9%. The Fort Calhoun. goal for. the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has -been set at 35% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months. Adverse Trend: The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours has been increasing. This increase is due to increased maintenance activities associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. L

J; 15* l-1IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) l ProceduralNoncompliance?IR's(Maintenance) i N 10-E L e i r o 7 f ~~~ L I 5 5 R 5-4 1 3 3. 3 2 2 2 2 1 l' l l 0 0 l 0 0 0. 0- 0 0 I 0-- Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 -f PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) This indicator has been changed. The Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) Indicator now shows the number of ~ identified Maintenance during the reporting mo) nth and the number : of these IR's that wereIncide that are related to the use of procedures-u caused by procedural noncompliance. It should be noted that the-second column will lag behind ' the first column until the IR -is closed. This 4 reporting method is due to the process in:which IR's receive category codes. IR's receive their category code when they_are being closed.- The number of identified IR's relating to the l use of procedures. has been increasing since December, 1989. This increase is due to the increased number of maintenance activities occurring at the Fort Calhoun Station associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. These increases in identified IR's are being watched by management to insure that they correlate with expected increases. This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumbers15and44. Adverse Trend: None.-

4 900-i - Open MW0's. O-Fort Calhoun Goal 800-1 700-o Nf u mM 1 ^ b W. 600- . O-- --- G - - --- G -----O----- G --- --G-- -- - G ---- G ---- G ---- G - --- O - e0 7o s 500-V 400-

i 300 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989

-1990 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE.NON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders - that are' open i-at the end of the reporting month. i L i At the end.of March, 1990, there were 513 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. The goal for this indicator. is to have less. than l 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. l This indicator was added. to the Performance Indicators. Report to trend Safety Enhancement. Program (SEP)'ItemNo.36. Adverse Trend: None I ! i t

j 5-E Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's 4- -l 4 L 1 N. 3-u m t b r 2- ) t-I 1-pys L p;; 3

n..

0 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 -1990 1 (UMBER OF MISSED SUltVEIL.ANCE TESTS ltESULTING IN LICENS EE EV ENT lEPORTS The Number of Missed Surveillance -Tests Resulting.in - Licensee Event Reports L Indicator has been added to the Performance-l Indicators Report. This indicator shows the l number of missed Surveillance Tests -(ST's) L that result -in Licensee Event Reports (LER's)duringthereportingmonth. During the month of March,1990,.there were no missed-ST's that resulted in LER's. This indicator tracks ST performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Numbers 60 and 61. Adverse Trend: None 'l f. I

i 35-I ITotal-NPRDS Component Failures' I 30-E Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures -+ 25- $F "" 20-f eI l r u r 15-o' .Apr..May Jun Jul Aug' Sep Oct-Nov Dec' Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 4 NUMBER OF NUCLEA: PLANT FELIABILITY ?ATA SYF' EMF (NPRJS) REPORTA BLE AILUR ES L This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures -and the number of -confirmed-NPRDS1 component failures. The total number of' NPRDS component failures is based -upon the number ~ of failure reports sent to IhPO.- The number of confirmed NPRDS com)onent failures is based upon the number of fa lure reports that have-been accepted by INPO. The difference of these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO. 'During March, 1990, there was a total of zero-confirmed NPRDS component failures. _j Adverse Trend: None [ ) i

r l l l t l 15- -+- Components With More Than One Failure M-Components With More Than Two Failures ) u m i b i 10-y = C o D. P o 5-4 y,,' y..... -X- ---- -X ,,x ',,, ,/ n x.....-x 'X,'s'X '.<',/ t a' ,/ s j 0 X' Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth b the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Anal sis and Evaluation of Operational Data (NRC/AE00). T e NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verif ng a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nu ear Plant Reliability Data System j (NPRDS)componentfailures. The indicator that has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and.the number of-NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months. The number l of. NPRDS components with more than two failures in a twelve-month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. During March,1990, there were 10 NPRDS components with more than one failure and 4 NPRDS components with than two fat?ures. Adverse Trend None -.. -

- Secondary System CPI +- Secondary System CPI Limit + Industry Upper Quartile 1-4----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----4----+ l GOOD i I .5- .38 0 0 '88 '89 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-Jan Feb 1989 1990 1000- - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 757.7-800-l g GOOD 359 r 400- + Is 200-0 '87 '88 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989-1990 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY i The top graph, Second ary System cienistrv Performance Index (CPI), has I been changed. The CPL is now calculated using three parameters. The i three parameters used include; cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam and condensate > ump d'.scharge dissolved oxygen. generator blowdown, The January, 1990, CPI was reportec as 0.25 in the February,1990, Performance Indicators Report. The actual value for January was 0.29. The CPI was-reported as 0.26 for the month of February. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is 1 0.20 The bottom graph, Chemistry is outside Owners Guidelines, tracks the total hours o 1 In February, parameters exceeding guidelines during. power operation. 1990, there were 0.0 hours outside owners group guidelines. The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of 'the station chemistry data. AdverseTredi: None -

.~ i 10- - Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit l 8 1 P s. e i r GOOD c i e f n t 4 i 1.9 I 2- .. O 0 '88 '89 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au9 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb ~ 1989 1990 l UlfARYSYSTEMCkEMISTRY PERC EN" 0F HOURS 0U7 0F Ll 41T The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters. The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0.0%_for-the month of February,100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for-the month. Adverse Trend None i l e 9 ...,,nn> +. e .r. w- .. ~, - -,

e-u v

l w Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit -G Industry Upper Quartile f 40-l GOOD + 30-i l H o u 20-r . 1 8 l 10-1 l 0 0 O'~4---O O O O &-4 0 0 0 0 0 i '88 '89 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 AUXILIARY SYSTEM JCCW) CE4 STRY HOURS OUTSIDE S"ATION ... ( IS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of -the chemistry data for the i,. station. The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside i' station limits for the monti of February, 1990 was reported as zero. The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits -is 2.6 hours. The Fort Calhoun. Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this area. Adverse Trend None .42 -,nn c...... ... ~, - -,,,,.,,, w..,..

l ? l 3 Number of Out-of-Service Instruments e 25 G-Fort Calhoun Goal 20-1 i Nn u s m t 15-l b e e u i r m o n f t i s 5- ... o.....a.... c 0-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 1 IN-LINE C' EMISTF Y INSTRUMENTS r OU"-OF-S ERV1CE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary S Sampling System (PASS). ystem and the Post Accident At the end of March there were a total of 16 l. in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Eleven of these instruments were from the Secondary System and five were from PASS. The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service is 3. Adverse Trend None.

I .i 0- = Waste Oil Non-Halogenated Hazardous Waste ~ 7500 M Halogenated Hazardous Waste i IOther Hazardous Waste K 6000-jo I f l o W g 4500-a r a5 t a s' 3000-1500-t m E-n -Bm. O

== -==_ Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 i HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the amount of waste oil,logenated non halogenated hazardous waste, ha hazardous-waste, and other hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. During the month of March 193.7 kilograms of waste oil-was pr,oduced, 0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced, 164.5 kilograms of halo waste was produced, genated hazardous and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced. Adverse Trendt None ) l l u l \\ l

- - - ~ l l l 5000-l lMonth j E Quarter OPPD l Year Limit 4000-l 1 3000-m R E j i M 2000-i 1 March 1990 1 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During March, 1990 an individual accumulated 1,242 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for.the month. The maximum individual exposure reported for the first quarter of 1990 was 1,242 mRes. The maximum individual exposure to date for 1990 was 1,242 mRes. The high maximum individual ex>osure reported for the month of March, the first quarter of 1990, and the 1990 year to date value was due to increased activities in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated with the.1990 Refueling I Outage. The maximum accumulated 1989 individual exposure was 1,165-mrem, received by a Health Physicist. The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year. Adverse Trend: None i..

.. _. ~ _ i E Monthly Contaminations 500- - Cumulative Contaminations G. Fort Calhoun Goal + sky pper QuaMe l 400-357 P e t r i GOOD l n 4 n l e 200-157 I l CF O ---e---e __- 0 ---+---O --- G - _- G---O --- G--- O i o__ o o o_ o o_ o_.-.o._ o.. .o. _o __._o j 100- {' Eini- '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS There was a total of 27 skin and clothing contaminations reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during February, 1990. These contaminations consisted of 7 skin contaminations, 24 clothing contaminations, and 4 combination skin and clothing contaminations. There has been a total of 39 skin and clothing contaminations so far in 1990. The high number of skin and clothing contaminations which occurred during the month of March, 1990, was related to increased' activity in the Radiation ControlledArea(RCA)duringthe1990RefuelingOutage. There was a total of 157 skin and clothing contaminations in 1989. The 1990 goal for skin and clothing is 150 contaminations. This 1990 goal of 150 contaminations includes a Fort Calhoun goal of 23 skin contaminations. The industry-upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually. This indicator provides information on personnel performance forSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumbers15and54. Adverse Trend: None, l

) - Decontaminated Auxiliary Building 100-1 i p e 60-c e n t 40-h G000 20-i 0 i Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 i i t DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean)basedonthetotalsquarefootage. As of March 31, 1990, 72.5% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated. The decrease in the percentage of the auxiliar was decontaminated at the y building which end of March was due to increased activity in the auxiliary building associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. I This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety Enhancement i Program (SEP)ItemNumber54. Adverse Trend: None 1 l

l 5-i E Number of Identified PRWP's i r i N 4-u e i o b e r 3-l' o f l l* P 2-2 2 I R b 97 W t-4 l* p P'- M 1 s 1 l i l: n n . t.; 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 'i ? RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAN L The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator has been added to the Fort Calaoun Station Performance Indicators Report. This i indicator shows the number of Poor i Radiological Work Practices (PRWP's) which were identified during the reporting month. The number of PRWP's which are identified l each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. During the month of March, 1990, zero PRWP's were identified. \\ l This indicator tracks radiological work p(erformance for Safety Enhancement Program SEP) Item Number 52. Adverse Trend: None

i j l l Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged - Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged t G-Cumulative Goal { 785 800-GOOD C 600-u r f 432 s 400-i 200-O --- O --- G----O ---G--- +--- G --- G----G ---GA 0 '87 ' 88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 GASEOUS RA)f 0AC"IVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGE ) TO "HE ENVIRONMENT i The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. A total of 164.4 curies have been released to the environment from January throu!)h December of 1989. The Fort Calhoun Stat on goal is 145 curies for this indicator. l The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Adverse Trend: None

1..

y ,y

I l l L._.) Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged - Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged G-Cumulative Goal 228 231 400-lllr C 300 &-+- +- O-O - O -+ --G -+-e- &- 0 180 u i i l 1 200' GOOD \\ + l 100-l 'I I I 'I I' O '86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l 2500-0 T i i h 2000-l o g u, 1500-5 1 a3 1000-o d 500-n s s 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 i LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 149.1 curies from January through December 1989. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is 320 curies. The bottom graph has been changed This graph now shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks totaled 1.2 million gallons from January through December, 1989. i The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. j Adverse Trend: None

35-E Number of Loggable/ Reportable Incidents N 30-29 i u O b 25-r l o 20-f i n 15-13 c i d 10-e n t s 5-4 l 1 1 1 0 m 0 0 LDV Badges Escort System Key Access j Failures Control Control March 1990 i LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security bad security key control, escorting, access control,ges, and security system failures for the reporting month. During the month of March, 1990, there were 44 loggable/ reportable incidents identified. Security system failures accounted for 29 of the. i loggable/ reportable incidents (65%) reported during March, 1990. Increased emphasis is currently being placed on maintenance, testing, and upkeep of the security system. This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58. Adverse Trend None

@ Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's) [ lill; Security Badges I I Security Key Control l Escorting M Access Control i Security System Failures LDV's 2% x SystemFailures65%f N \\ Badges 30% is, i \\ 1 \\', t '4llllI / plWscorting2% 4 E ~ e s f 'N SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN The Security Incident. Breakdown Indicator shows the \\ percentage of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month. These items include: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges security key control, escorting, access control, and security I system failures. Security Items Number of Incidents 9 Mg_3 FEB 1990 LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LOV's) 1 0 Security Badges 13 13 Security Key Control 0 1 i Escorting 1 5 Access Control 0 O Security System Failures 29 21 Total 44 40 i This indicator provides information on security performance forSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.58. Adverre Trend: None . I 4 -. + ,~ .,-4

( l 15-l l 13 l u l-O i i b i i e 10-t- r o-8 f -~ r l F a 1 5-5 i l u r i e s ~' 2 1 0 0 Alarm System CCTV Computer Terminal Door Card Reader SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The Security System failures Indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month. These items include alarm system. failures failures, security computer failures, terminal failures. CCTV , door [ equipment failures, and card reader failures. System Failures Number of Incidents Mar 90 Feb 90 Alarm Systems 13-3 CCTV 0 0 Computer 2 6 Terminal 5 6 Door Equipment 8 6 Card Reader 1 0-Total 29 21 This indicator provides information on security performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.58. Adverse Trend: None 1

i 15- - Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 12-i i i GOOD P 9 + e ,c E 6-I 3-O Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar-l 1989 1990 l i AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS-(NON-0UTAGE) i This procurement indicator displays the ~ amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a percentage. I The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts increased to 6.4% in March. As of March 31, 1990 - there were a total of 1,146 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 73 of these items on hold awaiting parts. l Adverse Trend None T F -

~ 10- - Spare Parts Inventory Value M 9 t o D 7 p a r s 6-5 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of March,1990 was reported as $8,102,400. 1 Adverse Trend None h s T 9 L : i

i l \\ 500-i T - Spare Parts issued h o i u 400-i s a n d 300-s o I ^ 200-c N 1 1 100-a r r s O Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 i SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during March, 1990, totaled $183,852. i Adverse Trende None l 4 ~56-

'1 100' - Inventory Accuracy 80-P 60-i r C I 40-20-i 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 t INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month. During March, 406 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of-the 406 line-items counted 58 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy.for the month of March was reported as 86%. Adverse Trendt None i.

l-15- -e-Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available d-Pick Tickets With Zero Quantity On Hand l l i i P P1 10-I e c rk C l eT ni tC i k i o e 5-ft s 3 t 6..... 6 ~~~~~O l 0 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 s STOCK 00T RATE i This indicator shows the sercentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated w'th no parts available and the number of Pick Tickets generated.that the MIS computer system showed a sufficient parts. quantity but no > arts were available com>ared to the total number of Pick Tickets generated during the reporting month. I During the month of March, a total of 4,162 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 4,162 Pick Tickets-generated, 55 were generated with no parts available and 28 Pick Tickets were generated with the MIS computer system showing a sufficient supply of. parts but no parts were available. Adverse Trend None ? i.

1500 O Total Receipts. 6-Spare Parts Receipts -O-Standard Stores Receipts l 1200- -x-Direct Charge Receipts i i 900-e b i ,e 1 r(I 4 600-O s i f a l. i 4 O 300-

g. '.-

0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 t j WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS This indicator shows the total number of warehouse receipts,: the number of spare parts receipts, the number of standard stores receipts; and the number of direct charge receipts during the reporting month. j, During March the warehouse received a total of 938 receipts. - Of. the 938 receipts received,137 4 were spare parts receipts, 170 were standard stores receipts, and 631 were direct charge receipts. Ad"erse ^ Trend An adverse trend for this inc1cator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was changed during the month of February, 1990. l. ~. -. -.u ,.+. -m._

1 .j i l I l 4000- -O-Total Issues i 6-Spare Parts Issues -G-Standard Stores Issues X Direct Charge Issues l I 3000-i \\. t M I o 5 b e "5 2000-j r* O. y% o f ^ j 1000- .a l i i l 0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 WAREHOUSE ISSUES This indicator shows the total number of warehouse issues, the number of spare parts issues, the number of standard stores issues, and the number direct charge issues for the reporting month. During March the warehouse completed a total of 2,595 issues. Of the 2,595 issues completed, 782 were spare parts issues,1,238 were standard stores issues, and 575 were direct charge issues. Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this indicator. is indeterminable due to the fact that it was changed during the month of February, 1990. r : ~ ~ - - -~ -~

l l L j i 15 -s-Total Returns 6-Spare Parts Returns l -O-Standard Stores Returns X Direct Charge Returns T Po 10 l et a ra i c1 e ~ l n! Q ts s ou a i S-fe. s s 's, 's b i Os,9 0 X X feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan l 1990 1991 L ,B EHQUSE RETURNS [ The Warehouse Returns Indicator has been changed during' the month of March,1990. This indicator now shows the percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns i compared to the total number of warehouse issues during the reporting month. During the month of. March there were a total of 2,595 warehouse issues. Of the 2,595 issues, there 'were 101 4 total returns. These returns consisted of 67 spare parts returns, 34 standard stores returns, and zero direct charge returns. Adverse Trent: An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was changed during the month of March, 1990. I. - -

i 50 I l Material Requests Awaiting Approval l @ Material Management Division Contacted to Order l $ 40-t 3 e Nr i u 30 b1 i e rR l 20-oq 10 0 January 1990 February 1990 March 1990 1 MATERIAL RE0 VESTS AWAITING APPROVAL l This indicator shows the total number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month and the total number of materials requests in which the Material r Management Division (IND) has been contacted to order material at the end of the reporting month. At the end of March, 9-material requests were awaiting approval and 34 material re been given to IND to order material. quests had Adverse Trend None,

l I 2- - Percentage of Total Purchases that are Expedited 1.5-I j J i p e r c 1-e l n ' t .5-s i 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i 1990 t JXPEDITED PURCHASES 4 The Expedited Purchases - Indicator has i been changed during the month of March, 1990. This indicator shows the percentage of expedited aurchases compared to the total number of purchase orcers generated t during the reporting month. During March, there was' a total of 457 purchase orders generated. Of the 457 purchase orders generated,. there was a total of 5 expedited purchases. Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this, ind'cator is indeterminable due to the fact that this indicator was changed during the month of March, 1990. l r i t -

4. 1 0-1 IJanuary 1990 E February 1990 E March 1990 ~ l 60-I i j N g -i i u n 3. m b Y ej40- . 1 C o' f 5 9 20-0 ~ Shelf Life CQE Miscellaneous 4 l I i INVOICE BREAKDOWN i This indicator shows the number of invoices that are on hold at the end of the reporting month due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons. At the end of March, 16 invoices were on hold due to shelf life reasons, 47 invoices were on hold due to CQE reasons, and 52 invoices were on hold. due to miscellaneous reasons. Adverse Trend: None -twv.ve. -w .*-3%,, w -'~r-.~-rw,-re,= -w,,w-,srow--,me--i,,w---w--...-=we-e-r-* w.we.- ~ -ww-

a'--

- - + - - -= = e *----- - - - -- - - - -"

100-

Percentage of Material Requests for Issues with the Request Date the same as the Need Date l

i i l 80-l [60-r i i c [ e n 40-i l-t l 20-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1 MATERIAL REOUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their l request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month. During the month of March, a total of 2,270 MR's for issues were received by. the warehouse. Of the 2,270 total MR's received. by the warehouse, 1,391 Mt's were for issues with their request date the same as their need date. Adverse Trend: None i 4 n i _

700- - Total Modification Packages Open 500j I 1 500-( 425 425 j 384 400- ~ N I 300-200- '87 '88 '89 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 3 l i OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS' The total number of outstanding modifications decreased by 21 during the month of March. CATEG@Y JAN 90 FEB 90 MAR 90-Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 64 .66 63 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 122 113 110 Design Engr. Back og 0 0 0 Design Engr. In Progress 95 99 97 Construction Backlog /In Progress 65 66 72 l l yspnEnor.UndateBacklooInProoress l* As of the end of March,17 additional modification requests have been issued this year. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) has completed 43 backlog modification request reviews this year. The I Nuclear l Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 37 backlog modification request reviews this year. The number of reviews completed is high due to the fact that some of these requests were reviewed more than once. Adverse Trend: None ,e.-~.-.----_4-- y ,.,y. .,,,,..,...._.,,,_,._,,,,,,,__....._,m,

i: L j i

Temporary Electrical Modifications 100-

-b-Temporary Mechanical Modifications M L - Total Temporary Modifications 3 Nl80- .G-Fort Calhoun Goal L ui 'N60-l ec t , p -4 %.,,,,, g ' '~% --..$.. i yi

8. Z 4... 4 0..~. g.... 6.....e %.

y<.s......e......e.... 4 n-s O Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 M 25-o January 1990 f20 = February 1990 mf I l March 1990 t s 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 Age in Months YEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) l The top graph displays the total number of temporary modifications, a-monthly trend. of installed electrical and mechanical. temporary modifications, and a Fort Calhoun goal. There was a total of 54 jumpers installed in the plant at the end of March. Of the 54 installed jumpers, 26 electrical jum)ers and 28 temporary mechanical jumpers existed in the Fort Calioun i Station. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 25 total- ~ temporary modifications installed in the plant at the end of May, 1990. The bottom graph, Ace of Temoorary Modifications, displays the age of all electrical and mechanical temporary modifications by months installed in the plari This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 71. Adverse Trend: None -

n i 'l 25' I IOpen EAR's. Closed EAR's; -{ - Number of EAR's > 30 Days Old 20- 'l ~ f o Nf 15-i ] mE [ b A-eR~ p' 10- .s: 4 5-f 0-- E Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4. t March 1990 ENGINE TN3 ASSISTANCE REOUEST 4 01ITY BREAKDOWN-This indicator shows the number of. open and closed Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's) broken. down l into priorities. at the end of the reporting month. E Along with the priority breakdown, the number ~ of - i; EAR's that are greater than 30 days old are shown for each priority category. Priority Doen Closed > 30 Days Old MAR fe. fitt MAR fth litt 28.D. f.th litt Priority 1 5 4 12 3 4-5 13 1 9 Priority 2 12 14 16 2 2 1 8 10 14-Priority 3 13 14 15 5 5 5 9 10 14 Priority 4 5 6 9 3 2 3 4 6 7 Total 35 38 52 13 13 14 34 27 44 Adverse Trend: None ...-l

t- [ 150- -O-Total' ECN's. Open i -X-ECN's Opened During the Month! + ECN's Completed During the Month i L 120-N u m ~ b ' 90-r .X I / o [- f. l , E a/ N, / e' j 's ,/ ,/ N ,/ l ,./ .o 0 \\* Sep 'Oct Nov Dec Jan-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug-1989 1990 i p -ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS' The indicator shows the total number of open Engineering Change Notices (ECN's the number of ECN's opened ' during the rep)o,rting month, and the number of ECN's completed during the reporting month. At the end of March, 1990, there was a total i of 95.o 88 ECNpen ECN's=. During the month of March, s were opened, and' 53r ECN's were completed. Adverse Trend:' None 1 ,,w.- -y ,.-e ew-

l 180 I IDocument Change E Substitute Replacement Item 160-Facility Changes 148 140- [ 110 100-j 80-60-43 -- 42 40-31 $ni 32 24 25 23 0-Total ECN's ECN's Opened ECN's Completed Total ECN's Open-During the Month _During the Month Received + b ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN 3 This indicator breaks down the total. number of. Engineering Change Notices- (ECN's) that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month the number of ECN's that were completed.during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received by Desi Engineering during the reporting month into several categories. gnThese. categories-include: ECN's requiring a document change to. complete : ECN's requiring L.. substitute replacement items to comp'ete, and ECN's requiring facility changes to complete. Total Doen Opened Comoleted Received Document Changes 31 42 25 110 Substitute Replacement 43 32 23 148 Facility Changes 24 14 4 47 Adverse Trend: None e

i 5-1990 Recordable Injury Frequency. Rate ~ -M-1989 Recordable Injury Frequency Rate +- 5 Year Average Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4-3.5-GOOD 3-R' a 2.5- +'s e

, ', A,' s,' % ',,

A M 2-N \\ s N,, 1.5- +....,....-+.,p......+....p......p 1- .5 0 X m Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun -Jul Aug Sep Oct-Nov Dec March 1990 4 RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate in column form. The above graph also includes the 1989 recordable injury frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5. year average. cases recordable injury cases frequency rate. A recordable injury case! is reported if Nuclear Operations Division L ' personnel are injured on the job and require. corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis. There were zero recordable. injury cases. reported during the month of March. There has been a total of one recordable. injury case so far in 1990. There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1989, eleven reported in L 1988, 'and eight reported in 1987. The year end recordable injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 2.5,. 2.6, and 2.2 respectively. This indicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety - EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15andSEPItem26. 1 Adverse Trend: None i

Licensee Event Reports I IPersonnel Errors Reported in LERs - Cumulative Licensee Event Reports Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs -? 50-46 39 40-31 30-6 . G 12 '87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug.Sep Oct -Nov-Dec 1990 NUMBEF OF PERSONNEL ERRORS RIPORTED IN LER'S The Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Indicator has been changed. This indicator now reports the Licensee Event Reports -(LER's) by their event date instead - of the month that they were submitted to the NRC. In March,1990 there were 3 LER's reported. Out of the 3 l LER's which occurred, there were 2 LER's attributable to l personnel error. There have been 10 LER's reported so far in 1990 and 4 LER's have been attributable to personnel errors. This indicator provides information on personnel performance forSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15. Adverse Trend: None

f t 1, I INuclear Divisions Turnover Rate - OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate .s 5-l T 4-u r n o 3-Y e r 2-R a-t e 1 0 Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality Division Division and Environmental l Affairs l PERSONNEL TURNOVER ~ RATE .The turnover rate -for three. Nuclear Divisions' is shown for the. last - twelve

months, The personnel turnover rate is plotted against the OPPD corporate turnover rate of 4.0%. This 0 PPD corporate turnover rate is-based on < the turnover ' rate over the last

'^ three years. Adverse Trend: None..

j 600 E Actual Staffing 561 542 I IAuthorized Staffing a p 400-e r s n-n n e 212 1 200-196 53 45 0-Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services Division Division Division I l i STAFFING LEVEL { The authorized and actual. staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.. i This indicator tracks staffing (SEP) level for i. Safety Enhancement Program Item Number 24. Adverse Trend: None ~ l 1 !

i 5 - 100-I- l February 1990 i 80-S R 0 P. a s s R-40~ a a t i 20-l ~ No Exams No Exams. No Exams -Administered Administered Administered 0 NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD-Administered Generic-Site Specific Requalification Requalification L Fundamental Exams Exams Exams Exams l l SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The SRO License Examination' Pass Ratio Indicator-shows the number of NRC x administered Generic Fundamentals Exams -(GFE's), the number - of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, -the number of. NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD ' administered license requalification-exams. No SR0 License examinations were. administered during March, 1990. OPPD ADMINISTERED --NRC ADMINISTERED Requal Generic Fund. S'ite Spec. Requal~. DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO Feb 1990 100 Adverse Trend: None .+. ,s m

1 L 1 l 100-I IFebruary 1990 80-I R O / P 60-a l s s. R 40-t ~ i 0 20-t No Exams No Exams No Exams Administered Administered-Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered 0 PPD Administered Generic Site Specific Requalification Requalification Fundamental Exams Exams Exams I Exams l l l R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The R0 License Exarination Pass; Ratio Indicator shows the number 'of HRC administered' Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of 'NRC. administered license requalification-exams and'the number of.OPPD administered license requalification exams. No R0 License examinations were administered during' the month of March, 1990. l* OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED' Requal Generic Fund.. Site Spec.

Requal, p.

DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO' % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO Feb 1990 100 t Adverse Trend: None, i .i

1 I I SRO Exams Administered 20- @ SRO Exams Passed' . R0 Exams Administered !!iiii: R0 Exams Passed N 15-u b 5 e ? r l l o 10-i 1. 1 .n E l t x . j a. m 5-i s

__/

~

E 0

Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 1990 1991 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator-shows the number of.SRO and RO c uizzes and exams.taken and. passed each monti. These internally administered. quizzes and exams are used to plot the SR0 and RD candidates' monthly progress. During the month of March,1990,. 2 SRO exams I were administered and 2 SRO exams were passed. i During. March,13 RO exams 'were administered l and 12 RO exams were passed. Adverse Trendt None l t :

L l L . j E Hotlines' Initiated l 50-1/A 50tlines Closed . t, u H tlines'0 pen Under 4 Weeks 45-Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks. N u 40-a b 35-i e P - 30 o i f. 25- \\.. y N 20-o E o-i r 1 15-L 1 i E if i . 4; .i z 0 lf h l

"" E ll Apr.

May Jun. Jul .Aug. Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb-Mar. 1989 1990 I HOILINES This-indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated during the reporting month, the number of. Hotlines closed during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines that remain open and. are less than four weeks' old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old. During the month of March,1990, there were p 14 Hotlines initiated, 16 Hotlines closed, 7 Hotlines that remained open and were less i than four weeks old, and 4-Hotlines that remained open and were older than four weeks old. I Adverse Trend: None , L ,-----..~,-,,,n,. ,,.y,, ..ww

i 4-E Planned Classroom Hours I IActual Classroom Hours T. h 3 o i Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fb [ 1989 1990 ~ 1 CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS er of actual c1!s room ssroom hours an t e nu hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. n h due to th[ tin o col ec an process needed information. Adverse Trend: None c 1

l \\ I IOperations 25-E Maintenance. @ Chemistry and Radiation Protection E Technical Support E General Employee Training T E Other h o u I s p s m l 0 l-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug. Sep Oct-Nov Dec Jan Feb 1989 1990 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and. Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and' Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. i This indicator is one month behind the reporting month.due to the time i needed to collect and evaluate the' data. Total Hours-1 TRAINING JAN 1990 f1B 1990 Operations 2,899 2,435 Maintenance 4,435 3,278 Chemistry and 3,886 900 Radiation Protection Technical Support 1,739 1,323 General Employee Training 2,802 '1,982 r 2.072 520 Tota 17,833-10,438 6,dyerse Trend: None , l

1 r 1 l-j -- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours G-Fort Calhoun Goal' 11.1 15-GOOD [ 12-4 -l 7.1 9, j 13-O---- &- -- G ----O ---@- --G --- G---- O --- @ ---G --- &--- O r 6-i '87 '88 ' 89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May' Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-1990 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This -indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports-per 1000 NRC' L inspection hours. This indicator was - calculated - using the number of violations and the number of l inspection hours from the months of November,1989' through February,' 1990. This indicator is one month behind the. reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data. The violations per :1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 5.5' for' the month of February, 1990. 't There was one violation cited - for the month of February. There have been a total of 3 violations cited with 722 inspection hours in 1990. 1 The goal for. the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.2. j Adverse Trend: None

75-R Number of. Violations During the Last 12 Months ^ Number of NCV's During the Last 12 Months V i .1 o l i a N' 50-t 47 ~ u 0 m. 41 bn s e 36 j r, U o f d. 25-N C 16 V 14, i 11 s 0- - Jan -Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep' Oct-Nov Dec 1990 i l -1 l CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND=NCV's (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) i The: Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCV's) Indicator has-been added to-the Fort Calhoun~ Station Performance Indicators = Report. This '. indicator shows the cumulative number of violations for the.last twelve - months and the cumulative number of-i l NCV's for the last twelve months. During the 'last twelve months, 36 violations have been identified and 16 NCV's -have been a identified. 4 i Adverse Trend: None i i r _

i Total Outstanding CAR's-t -. Outstandirig CAR's > Six Months Old Outstanding CAR's That'Are Modification Related 200-150-i o Nf + u h100-r - eR i p ,..,.,l,t 4 n e;;$q "Q ; -pv

i- ' i ~

gg 5v y x.v :' ,1 .;. y;s..,:y ' 8 50- ..; }.; gm: - + c ~. 7 ,7 <:;; ; u.. &g ,e,;!, . L L:. ..~ - e - - -~ + a-=~~

,,a..

0-Apr May Jun Jul .Aug Sep-Oct-Nov Dec 'Jan. Feb Mar 1989 1990 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This. indicator shows the-total number of~ outstanding Cctrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that l are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that are modification related. As of the end of March,1990 there were 145 outstanding. CAR's reports,. 39 CAR's that are greater than six months old, and 10 ' CAR's that are modification related. Adverse Trend: None 1 1 4 i

o 140-Overdue CAR's-l- 1 CAR,'s With Extensions Granted 'h30-m b. e P j , ;20- .g C 'A-R- 10-l s-0 E N P 0 N P 0 N P 0 N-P 0 N P 0 N P 0-O E t 0 E t - 0 E t 0-E t 'O -E t 0 E t D-D h D D h D D h D D h D D h D D h-e e e e e e i - r r r r r r I s s s s s s Oct 1989 Nov 1989 Dec'1989 Jan 1990 Feb 1990 Mar 1990 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS-The Overdue and Extended Corrective Action ' Reports -(CAR's) Indicator has been added to the Performance-Indicators Report. This-indicator ~ shows the number of overdue. CAR's and the number of - CAR's which i received extensions broken down by organization for the. last six months. OVERDUE CAR's ORGANIZATION JAN 90 FEB 90 MAR 90 NOD 2 1 0 PED 9 2 3 Others 2 1 0 Total 13 4 3 CAR's WITH EXTENSIONS GRANTED ORGANIZATION JAN 90 FEB 9D MAR 90 N0D 3 4 5 PED 7 3 6 Others 0 0 __ _ 0 Total 10 7 11 Adverse Trend: None i 84 v e r w a

1 .120-E CAR's >6 Months Old I ICAR's 0-6 Months Old N j f 90-l b e-r o-60-f- C ~ A t R 30-s 4 .3 0- = m- = EMI-- N P 0 N P 0 N P 0 N P 0 N P 0 N P 0' 0 E t 'O E-t 0 E t 0 -E t 0 E 't 0 E t D D h D D h D D h' D-D- h D 'D h D' D h e e e e e e L r r r .r r r-s s s s s s-L Oct 1989 Nov 1989 Dec 1989 Jan 1989 Feb 1989 Mar 1989 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS CURRENT STATUS The Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) Current Status Indicator. has been added to the Performance Indicators Report. This-indicator shows the number of CAR's that are older than 6 months and the-number of CAR's that are less than 6 months old broken down by organization for the last six months. CAR's GREATER THAN 6 MONTHS OLD ORGANIZATION JAN C0 FEB 90 MAR 90 NOD 14 11 ,7 PED-34-35 30 Others 2- _3 2 7 Total 50 49 39 CAR's LESS THAN 6 MONTHS OLD ORGANIZATION JAN 90 FEB 90 MAR 90-N00 60 35 43 PED 52 44 51 Others 8 5 12 Total 120 84 106 Adverse Trend: None L.

~ 1989 1990 OPPD SIGNIFICANT-NRC OPPD SIGNIFICANT IWtC l SALP FUNCTIONAL AREA CAR's CAR's VIOLATIONS LER'S CAR's CAR's VIOLATIONS LER'S' A. Plant Operations 11 0 ~8 2 10 (8) 0 0 6L(2) i B. Radiological Controls 30 1 2 1 ?_1 (7) 2 0 0 C. Maintenance / 140 8 2 10 75 (40). 3 3 (1) 0 Surveillance - l D. Emergency 8 0 0 0 0 0-0 0 j Preparedness ji E. Security 26 2 6 10 4 (4) 0 0 0 F. Engineering / 134 2 7 7 26 -(8) 0 0 4 (1) 1 Technical Support 'f G. Safety Assessment / 68 0 1 0 6 (2) 0 0 0 l Quality. Verification 1 ~f H. Other 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 l Total 417 13 26 31 142 (69) 5 3 (1) 10 (3) CAR'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT CAR'S VERSUS NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED VERSUS LER'S REPORTED The above matrix shows ~the numbernof Corrective ' Action Reports.(CAR's) issued by. the Nuclear i Services ' Division versus the. number _ of Significant CAR's issued by the Nuclear Services Division i versus the number of violations issued.by.the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for ;the Fort ~ Calhoun' Station 1n 1989 and 1990. - Included in this. table. is the number of Licensee Event Reports l (LER's). identified by the station each year. The number of MRC violations' reported are one month-behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting'and processing the violations. In March, 1990, there were 69 CAR's'. issued, zero Significant CAR's issued, and 3 LER's identified. During February one NRC violation was issued. This violation was attributable to personnel error. The monthly distribution of CAR's, -Significant CAR's, NRC. violations, - and LER's are shown in parentheses. This indicator monitors performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Items IS, 20.and 21. a .r-g g W 7 % " j 3-^-e. h m N'W~ T f D' I O' '7'"F' ( 4 '^ T' t'-9'#"t""' I'I'D**'te.rr"h,- - + - m-" ________.,____m,._,sm

e - i ESCkLATEDENFORCEMENTHISTORI Escalated enforcement includes level III,. II, and I violations-issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for deficiencies discovered at the-Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also: includes civil' penalties which are usually assessed with ' level III; -and higher violations.- Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for.the Fort Calhoun Station. l ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT

1. February 1985~

Site-Security - Multiple ' Level 'IV and V ~ Violations that were escalated to a Level III. A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed. 1 l

2. April 1986 Qualification.of Electrical Penetrations - Level III Violation.

No civil penalty was assessed.

3. May 1986 Radiological Protection Level III Violation.

. No civil penalty was assessed.-

4. December 1986 Physical Security - Level IV Violation.

A civil penalty of $15,000 was assessed.

5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety - Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation.

A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.

6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doorsi and Lack of Health-Physics Coverage to Very JHigh Radiation Areas Level III Violation.

A civil penalty of $75,000 was assessed.

7. February 1988 Design Evaluation,. Design Implementation and Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action-of l'.

Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 Level III: Violations. - A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed.

8. May 1988 Unlocked Very.High Radiation Door and' deficiencies identified in the Radiological Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations.

- A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessec. l- .3 l. ,e r ee e w a en, w w w -vvw-, -ee e,-sw-w mv, vwa,- ,-u

a

1l I ~ ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY (CONTINUED). L ESCALATED E'NFORCEMENT'

9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line.

SIRWT check valve test failures,_and Safety Analysis for Operability - Level III violation.. A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed. - 10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11-Setpoint Analysis and i incorrect information submitted in a response. No civil penalty was assessed..

11. November 1989 Two instances of safeguards documents left unattended

( outside the plant's protected area. Instances of. inadequate' package and vehicle searches. Inadequate measures ~ to-i com)ensate - for degraded security systems Level III .vio'ation. A civil penalty of $25,000 was assessed.

12. November 1989

-Inadequate testing of a turbine driven auxiliary feedwater-pump - Level III violation. No. civil penalty was assessed. f i e 6 e i V

\\ ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS ^ Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on-potential higher level -violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and p management meetings held with the NRC. L { RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS -1. January'1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January. This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security l Plan. '2. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference. was held with the NRC in February. This Enforcement Conference was held-L concerning the Radiological Protection Program.

3. February 1989 One mana held with the NRC in February. gement; meeting-wasThis management -me the. Safety Enhancement Program.

4. April 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC 'in April. This Enforcement Conference was he4 concerning Security.

5. May 1989 One management ' meeting was held with the NRC in May.

This management' meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.

6. July 1989 One-Enforcement Conference was held-with the NRC in July. This' Enforcement Conference was held' concerning e

auxiliary feedwater pump-FW-10 controller operability.

7. August 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC-in

-August. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems. 8.-September 1989 Two management meetings were held with the. NRC in l September. One management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP). The other management meeting concerned the Committee Review of GenericRequirements(CRGR). I 4 '!

I' 'I } ENFORCEMENTCONFERENCESANDMANAGEMENT' MEETINGS-(CONTINUED) One E' forcement Conference' was held' with-the NRC in -

9. January 1990 n

January. This Conference 'was held concerning two topics. One topic concerned the -simultaneous isolation of two Component Cooling Water (CCW) heat - i r exchangers. OPPD has been notified by the NRC that this topic has been. classified as a Level IV violation. The other topic concerned ST-CEA-1. This. L 3 Surveillance Test could ~ have taken both diesel generators out ofeservice at the same time. OPPD has been notified that this to a Non-Cited Violation (NCV)pic has been classified as

10. January 1990-One management meeting was held with the NRC in-January. This management meeting was held concerning-theSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)'.

11. February 1990 One management - meeting was ' held with the NRC -_in February. This meeting was held to. brief Jthe NRC i

concerning the status of the Fort Calhoun Station.

12. March 1990 Two management meetings were. held with the NRC in-March. One of these meetings was held concerning -

containment spray raw water, and containment purge. The other managem,ent-- meeting was held -with the NRC to present a general overview of the status of the Fort Calhoun Station.- i E i l l-t

i

i SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST-This section is intended to provide information on events which are significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a " heads-up" look at what is scheduled in the coming months.

- The 1990 INPO Plant Evaluation is scheduled to start on June 18, 1990. 'l The 1990 INP0 Corporate Evaluation is scheduled for July 9 through July 13, 1990. The INPO OPPD Simulator Evaluations are scheduled for-July, 1990. The NRC Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) -Review is scheduled to start on August 21, 1990. The NRC Maintenance Inspection Team follow-up review has been rescheduled until November, 1990. I I O 5 e i i :

4 FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS-AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS D This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding corrective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months. i AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator _ is defined as the percentage 'of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders that; are on hold awaiting parts, tc the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work-orders. AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry imit until additional sampling 'shows the p limit. The hours are accumulated from the first sample exceeding-the.l to be back within limits. CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number-of planned classroom.. hours and the number of actual classroom - hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT CURRENT STATUS The number of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) that are older-than 6 months and the number of CAR's that are less than 6 months old broken down by organization for the last 6 months. CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported. CUMJLATIVE VIO ATIONS AND NON-CITED VIOLATIONS (TWiLVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) The cumulative number of violations and Non-Cited. Violations for the last 12 months. DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts. DIESEL GENERATOR PEllABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel-supply system, lubricating. oil system, starting air system, autostart controls, manual controls, and diesel generator breaker. -. --

p FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS'(CONTINUED) r DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILI1Y (CONTINUEDF Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual DG unit. A successful' run is defined as a start of.a DG unit and the loading 'of this unit to a minimum of 50% rated load -(1250 KW) for a minimum time period of-60 minutes. A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the i. design rated load for the given time period as specified'for an emergency-or a valid test. The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of the failures and the successful runs. 1 'This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision l. This -is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort-Calhoun Station. D DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE (LOST TIME-ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator is defined as the number 'of. accidents for all utility l personnel permanently-assigned. to the station, involving days away from a work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include-contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP) Item 26. DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAll The Document Review Indicator shows the number of ' documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue. ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE00EST (EAR's) PRIORITY BREAKDOWN The number of open and closed EAR's broken down into priorities at the end of the reporting month. ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAKDOWN t The breakdown of the total number of open ECN's, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received during the reporting month into three categories. These categories include; 1) document changes are required to complete the ECN's, 2) substitute-or replacement items are required to complete the ECN's, or 3) facility changes are required to complete the ECN's., 4-4 y ...m ,c

1 FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS'(CONTINUED) ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE'(ECN) STATUS' The number of ECN's that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's that are completed during the reporting month. EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS-Equipment. forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the mean time-between forced outalet caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period. EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR .t This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed;as a' percentage. Available generation .is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated-continuous'y at maximum capacity. QiPQITED PURCHASES The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred during the reporting month compared to the total number of purchase orders generated. FORCED OUTAGE-RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was i unavailable due to i forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and. events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown' (i.e., the' unit is available but not in service. FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant 1-131 i activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is on the surface - of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.present i Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days. 1.. '~' ~' '

.c FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station. GROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in British Thermal Units (BTV) produced by the resctor to the total gross electrical energy produced by the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH). HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month. HOTLINES .The number of Hotlines that are initiated closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline. HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power. The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, ii,uPate, sodium, feed water pH dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge, - dissolved oxygen. IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in the Secondary Systen and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS). INVOICE BREAKDOWN The number of invoice miscellaneous reasons. s that are on hold due to shelf life, CQE, and LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the volume of liquid radioactive waste released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks. The curies from all releases from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River are also shown. 1 i

i i FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) LOGGABLE/REPORTADLEINCIDdNTS(SECURITY) i The total number of security incidents for the reporting month. This indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement Program Item t Number 58. MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS i The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) components with more than one failure and the number of NPRDS components with more l than two failures during the last twelve months. MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non outa e maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting ; month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 36. MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders by several. categories that remain open at the end of the reporting month. 1 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel. MATERIAL REOUESTS AWAITING APPROVAL 1 The number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month and the number of material requests in which the Material Management Division (M40) has been contacted to order the material for the material requests, j MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamme and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on'a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis. NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS1 FAILURE REPORT SUBM. TTE ) The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS component failures (confirmed and possible) and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure reports thet have been sent to the Institute of Nuclear Operations INPO). Confiried NPRDS component failures are based upon failure repo(rts that have been accepted by INPO. Possible HPR failures are based upon failure reports that are still under review by INPO., e e -e.

i FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT 'RELI ABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS1 FAILURE REPOR SUBN. TTE ) (CONTINUED 1 NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station. has been outlined by INPO and NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had 0 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting seriod is considered out-of-tervice and will be counted. The duration of tie out-of-service condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments. NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. TUMER 0F MISSE) SUUfEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN . ICE (SEI EVENT tEP0rs The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the rep (orting. This indicator tracks missed ST's for Safety Enhancement Program SEP)ItemNumbers60and61. NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC ins)ection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspect < on was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET, The year to date' budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance. OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of Modificatiort Requests (MR'S) in any state between the-issuance of a Modification Number and update. the completion of the drawing

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS'(CONTINUED) Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant approved. Modification Requests Being Raviewed This category includes: 1.)

Modificaticn kequests that are not yet reviewed 2.)

Hodification Requests being reviewed by)the Nuclear Projects Revi&w Committee (NPRC 3.)

Modification Requests being(NPC) reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Committee These Modification Requests may be reviewed several times before they are ap) roved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these Modificat"on Requests are returned to Engineering for more information, some approved for evaluation, some approved for study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modification Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they may be cancelled.

All of these different phases require review. Design Engineering Backlog i Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed, but PID has not started design work. Design Engineering In Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress. Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been-accepted by the System AcceptanceCommittee(SAC). Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated. l 1 J

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORR CTIVE ACTION REPORTS The number of overdue Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization for the last 6 i months. PERCENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS OLO This indicator displays the percentage of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) that are greater than six months old. i PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel ' including contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured by.he thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). t Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-rem. This l indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber54. PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is a vacancy created b death, termination, y voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, transfers within the company, and part-time employees are not considered in turnover. i PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE This indicator is defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber41. PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The percent of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride. Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used. l. PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) The number of identified incidents concerning maintenance procedural problems and the number of closed procedural noncompliance IR's. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item Numbers 15 and 41. RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The number of identified poor radiological work practices (PRWP) for the i reporting month. This indicetor tracks radiological work performance for SafetyEnhancement(SEP)ItemNumber52. . ? ~.

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man period. hours. This indicator tracks preventive ma'ntenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber41. RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATEl The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15 and SEP Item 26. R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or R0 quizzes and exams that are administered and passed each month. R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO 1 The R0 license examination pass ratio for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams administered license (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC requalification exams. qualification exams, and OPPD administered license l re SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power. The following equation is how the CPI is calculated: CPI =((Ka/0.8)+(Na/20)+(0/10))/3 2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of; Ka = average blowdown cation conductivity Na = average blowdown sodium concentration 02 = average condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen concentration { SECURITY INCIDENTS This indicator shows a percentile breakdown of the types of Security incidents for the reporting month. -100-l l

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) SECURITYINCIDENTS(CONTIkUED) i The following. items are the types of Security incidents represented in this indicator. l LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) Incidents related to the use of LDV'.s, e.g. ke vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to return keys.ys left in the i Security Badges Incidents involving-lost / unattended badges, badges removed from site, or failure to wear badges. Escorting Incidents involving escort responsibilities, e.g. improper controlorescortofcvisitor(s). Security System Failures Incidents involving alarm system failures CCTV failures, security com) uter failures, terminal failures,,. door equipment failures, anc card reader failures. Security Key Control Incidents involving Security key control, e.g. lost Security keys, Securit Security keys.y keys removed-from site, or failure to return l This t concerning LDV keys. ype of incident does not reflect incidents Access Control Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel,

packages, and vehicles, e.g.

failure to properly search personnel, packa}es, and vehicles. This item also includes the introduction or contraband' or prohibited items into the . Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items. This indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumberS8. SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The number of Security incidents concerning alarm systems failures CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equ,ipment failures and card reader failures. This indicator tracks security performan,eforSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumberS8. c SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period. -101-i

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) SPARE PARTS ISSUED The dollar value of the s >are parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc. SRO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The SRO license examination pass ratio for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams administered license (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC requalification exams. qualification exams, and OPPD administered license re STOCK 00T RATE The total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the re)orting month, the total number of Pick Tickets tl1at were generated dur'ng the reporting month with no parts available and the total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the re, porting month in which the >HIS computer system showed a sufficient supply of parts but no parts were available. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems. Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&ID, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams. Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures or Operating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications un,less the jumper or block remains in place af ter the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are nat considered as temporary modifications. Scaffolding is not considered a tem>orary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for whic) EEAR's have been subinitted, will be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. This indicator tracks temporary modifications for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber71. TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of trainin for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, gTechnical-Support, i General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. -102-l l 1

- ~. _ _ _ _ l FORTCALH0VNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm s performance for SEP Item No.15. quared. This indicator trends personnel i UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL l This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actuations) that occur while the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows: Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution. Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious. Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room. Critical means that during the steady-state condition of -the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations: the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of. power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety (system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unp'anned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks. -103- -m_ ,._.,,-..,.,,,,,_#%._m

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID' RAD 10 ACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste produced, in final form ready for burial, during a given period. It is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for dis)osti, plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. The volume of radicactive waste that is not yet in final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges resins, and evaporatorbottomsgeneratedas-aresultofnuclearpowerpiantoperation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at 4 low-level radioactive waste disposal site. except resin sludge or evaporator bottoms. Low-level referstoall,radioactivewas,tethatIsnot-spentfueloraby-product _of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumber54. WAREHOUSE ISSUES The total number of warehouse issues, the number of non-CQE stock issues, l the number of CQE stock issues, the number of direct charge non-CQE issues, and the number of direct charge CQE issues which occurred during the reporting month. WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non-CQE stock receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts which occurred during the reporting month. WAREHOUSE RETURNS The percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse issues. e k -104-

E83.1,$ FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS This section will expiain the basis used in establishing the 1990 performance goals. FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1990 to 1992. The following table is a i i i breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next three years. $TARTUP l l. GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD 2AF FOR ) .YJR (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) ,(&l .(,il 1990(*) 6356 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 1991(*) 6956 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 i 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7 i i (*) Refueling Outage Years l UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1990 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past four years of operation. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYS1EM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1990 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last six years. GROSS HEAT RATE The 1990 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,200 BTV/KWH. This heat rate goal is based on 10,435 BTU /KWH for the month of January, 10,450 BTU /KWH for the month of February 10,325 F.0/KWH for the month of May, 10,225 BTU /KWH for the month, f June, o 10,325 BTU /KWH for the month of July,10,250 BTU /KWH for the month of August, 10,125 BTU /KWH for the month of September, 10,050 BTU /KWH for the month of October, 10,000 BTU /KWH for the month of November, and 9,975 BTU /KWH for the month of December. -105-I ew.- .-.-,.,,n. -n- ,,-u---,,----,,.,,--e ~--1 ,s ,-e

BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GO M 4 (CONTINUED) 4 FUEL REllABILITY INDICATOR The 1990 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for ap)roximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels. PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) The 1990 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 287 man-rem. This goal was based on 234 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the 1990 Refueling Outage and approximately 5.9 man-rem of cumulative exposure for each non-outage month. VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIDACTIVE WASTE The 1990 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division. DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1990 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1990, i O o i -106-

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE EVENT FROM TO (MWH) (MWH) Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8 ' 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4.936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/17/90 Twelfth Refueling 02/17/90 - 05/14/90*

- Planned Oates

-107-I I s

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AN) REFJELING OUTAGE DATES (C0tTINU E)) PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE EVENT FROM TO (MWH) (MWH) Cycle 13 05/14/90*- 09/28/91* Thirteenth Refueling 09/28/91*- 11/22/91* Cycle 14 11/22/91*- 02/12/93* Fourteenth Refueling 02/12/93*- 05/06/93* Cycle 15 05/06/93*- 09/30/94* Fifteenth Refueling 09/30/94*- 11/26/94* I

- Planned Dates

-108-

1 FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS The following seven items are the current production and operation " records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.

1. First Sustained Reaction............. August 5,1973(5:47p.m.)

2. First Electricity Supplied to the System..... August 25, 1973

3. Comercial Operation (180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973 4.AchievedFullPower(100%)............May4,1974

5. Longest Run (477 days).............. June 8,1987 - Sept. 27,1988 6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober1987 7.MostProductiveFuelCycle(4,936,859 MWH).... June 8,1987-Sept.27,1988 (Cycle 11)

\\ -109-i

l l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Peterson/Schmitz Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/McCormick Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Stultz CAR's Current Status Orr/Gurtis CAR's Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Blome Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Schmitz Cumulative Violations and NCV's Chase /Simmons Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Gundal Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log DisablingInjuryFre.quencyRate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay Engineering Assistance Requests Priority Breakdown Jaworski/Middaugh Engineering Change Notice Breakdown Phelps/Bera Engineering Change Notice Status Phelps/Bera Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Expedited Purchases Willrett/Fraser Forced Outage Rate s Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult s Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray Hazardous Waste Produced Peterson/Sayre -110-1

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) Hotlines Gasper /Newhouse In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Peterson/Renaud Invoice Breakdown Willrett/Fussell Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environinent Jaworski/Stultz Loggable/ Reportable Security Incidents Sefick/Woerner Maintenance Effectiveness Jaworski/ Dowdy Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) Peterson/Schmitz Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Peterson/Schmitz Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Schmitz Material Requests Awaiting Approval Willrett/Fraser Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/Cary Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Chase /Simmons Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's Plant LER's Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Blome Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Overdue and Extended CAR's Orr/Gurtis o Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Blome PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumlative) Ceterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/ Linden -111-

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Jaworski/Stultz ProceduralNoncomplianceIncidents(Maintenance) Peterson/McKay i Radiological Work Practices Program Peterson/Mattice Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance-Peterson/Schmitz RecordableInjuryCasesFrequencyRate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 Hot License Exams Gasper /Howard R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Howard Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Stultz 4 Security Incident Breakdown Sefick/Woerner i Security System Failures Sefick/Woerner Spare Parts inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska i SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Howard Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager Stockout Rate Willrett/Fussell Temporary Hodifications Jaworski/ Turner Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Armagno i Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Breuer i Warehouse Issues Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Receipts Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Returns Willrett/Fussell i e -112-

l I REFERENCES INPO Good Practices DA-102, ' Performance Monitoring - Management Information" IEEE Standard 762, "!EEE Trial Use Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity" INPO Report Dated November 1984, ' Nuclear Power Plent Operational Data" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 ) s-d t -113-i a}}

ML20042H004

Text

Navigation menu

Search