ML20042G617
| ML20042G617 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 05/10/1990 |
| From: | Diianni D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Parker T NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. |
| References | |
| GL-89-10, IEB-85-003, IEB-85-3, TAC-75704, TAC-75705, NUDOCS 9005150165 | |
| Download: ML20042G617 (4) | |
Text
-
L
(
r:
Docket Nos. 50-282/306 DISTRIBUTION Docket:Filee Dilanni NRC & Local PDRs OGC i-Thomas M. Parker PD31 Reading EJordan Nuclear Support Services Department JZwolinski ACRS(10)
Northern States Power Company MRShuttleworth 414 Nicollet th11 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 t-
Dear Mr. Parker:
L
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 89-10 " SAFETY-RELATED MOTOR-OPERATED VALVE (MOV) TESTING AND SURVEILLANCE" (TAC NOS. 75704 AND 75705)
L Generic Letter GL 89-10, " Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valve Testing and l
Surveillance" requested each licensee / applicant to extend the scope of the program outlined in Bulletin 85-03 and Supplement I to include all safety related MOVs as well as all position changeable MOVs as defined in the GL.
The licensee's program should include testing, inspection and maintenance programs of MOVs-so as to provide the necessary assurance that the MOVs will function when subjected to the design basis conditions during both normal operation and abnormal transients within the design limits of the plant.
By letter dated December 28, 1989, you submitted a response to GL 89-10 for j
the MOVs that are installed at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant i
Unit Nos. 1 and 2.
Your submittal committed to implementing the recommendations-of.GL 89-10 within our proposed schedule.
The recommendations of GL 89-10 deals primarily with changes.to the diagnostic equipments which you have committed to address.
Based on the review of your submittal, we find that you aave provided an acceptable response to GL 89-10.
As part of any future reporting requirements you shall submit in writing any future changes to the scheduled commitments or alternative actions.
These revised schedules or alternative actiont'may be implemented without NRC approval.
You should however retain technical justification for the revised schedules and alternative actions as l
part of your site records.
This fulfills'your requirements in addressing'the l
concerns of this issue which we consider complete and TAC Nos. 75704 and 75705 are closed.
Your efforts in this issue may be subject to future' inspection-'at our discretion.
Sincerely,
)
'l J C%M~<c l/ L
/
Dominic C. Dilanni, Project Manager Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V & Special Projects Office af Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page "See previous concurrence k 0 h,/
PM/PD31:DRSP*
( A)D/PD31: DRSP*
,J7 3
/
l l-DDilanni JThoma
(
02/05/90 W / M 90 g
Ji' y
9005150165 900510 PDR ADOCK 050002642
(' ~
P PDC L
=
w t
4 y, '
i Docket 50-282 50-306 i
Thomas M. Parker 1
-Nuclear Support Services Department Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall-Minneapolis', Minnesota 55401
Dear Mr. Parker:
s
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE'TO GENERIC LETTER 89-10 " SAFETY-RELATED MOTOR-0PERATED VALVE (MOV) TESTING AND SURVEILLANCE" Generic Letter GL 89-10 " Safety Related Motor-Operated Valve Testing and Surveillance" requested each licensee / applicant to extend the scope of the program outlined in Bulletin 85-03 and supplement I to include all safety related MOVs as well as all position changeable MOVs as defined in the GL.
The licensee's program should include testing, inspection and maintenance programs of MOVs so as to provide the necessary assurance that the MOVs will function when subjected to the design basis conditions during both normal operation and abnormal transients within the design limits of the plant.
By letter dated December 28, 1989 you submitted a response to GL 89-10 for the MOVs that are installed at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Unit Nos. I and 2.
Your submittal committed the implementing the recommendations of GL 89-10 within our proposed schedule.
The recommendations of GL 89-10 deals primarily with changes to the diagnostic equipments which you have committed to address.
Based on the review of your submittal, we find that you have provided an acceptable response to GL 89-10.
This fulfills your requirements in addressing the concerns of this issue which we consider complete.
Yetir
-efforts in this issue may be subject to future inspection at our discretion.
i Dominic C. Dilanni, Project Manager Project Directorate III-1
-Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V & Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket File DDilanni NRC & Local PDRs OGC PD31 Reading EJordan JZwolinski ACRS(10)
HRShutt w r,th PM/PD31:DRSP"
( A)D/PD31: DRSP DDilanni JThoma 2/f/90 2/ /90 l
m
p a'.((e nsg.
['
jo
'g UNITED STATES
.1 g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-E ef wAsmNGToN, o. C. 20555
\\e... /
May 10, 1990.
Docket Nos. 50-282/306 f
J Thomas M. Parker.
. Nuclear. Support Services Department 1
Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall l
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Dear Mr. Parker:
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 89-10." SAFETY-RELATED MOTOR-OPERATED VALVE (MOV) TESTING AND SURVEILLANCE" (TAC N05. 75704 AND 75705)
Generic Letter GL 89-10, " Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valve Testing and Surveillance" requested each licensee / applicant to extend the scope of the program outlined in Bulletin 85-03 and Supplement 1 to include all safety-related MOVs as well as all position changeable MOVs as defined in the GL.
The licensee's program should include testing, ir.spection and maintensnce programs of MOVs so as to provide the necessary assurance that the MOVs will function when subjected to the design basis conditions during both normal
' operation and abnormal transients within the design limits of the plant.
By letter dated December 28, 1989, you submitted a response to GL 89-10 for the MOVs that are installed at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Unit Nos..1 and 2.
Your submittal committed to implementing the recommendat,lons of GL 89-10 within our proposed schedule.
The recommendations of GL 89-10 deals primarily with changes to the diagnostic equipments which you-have committed to
'~,
address. - Based on the review of your submittal, we find that you have provided an acceptable response to GL 89-10.
As part of any future reporting requirements you shall submit in writing any future changes to the scheduled commitments or alternative actions.
These revised schedules or alternative actions may be implemented without NRC approval.
You should however retain technical justification for the revised schedules and alternative actions as part of your site records.
This fulfills your requirements in addressing the concerns of this issue which we consider complete and TAC Nos. 75704 and 75705 are closed..Your efforts in this issue may be subject to future inspection at our discretion.
Sincerely.
0
/
-ww Dominic C. Dilanni, Project Manager Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Piojects - III, IV, V & Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
l w, ', *.
.l
+
Mr. T. M. Parker' Prairie Island Nuclear Generating I
Northern States Power Company Plant i
cC.
Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 2300 N Street
-N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
. Dr. J. W. Feman.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Mff.55155 Mr. E. L. Watz1 Plant Manager Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company Route 2-Welch, Minnesota 55089 Joseph G. Maternowski Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Suite-200' 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 U.S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident' Inspector's Office 1719 Wakonade Drive East Welch, Minnesota' 55089 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for i
Operations 799 Roosevelt Road l
Glen Ellyn, Illinois 00137
?
Mr. William Miller, Auditor Goodhue County CoJrthouse n
' Red Winn, Minnesota 55066
?;-
{
c i
-j m
.