ML20042G251

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Estimates of Time Impact on Facility Personnel Re Topics Identified in Generic Ltr 90-01.Info Presented in Format of Completed Questionnaire Sheets
ML20042G251
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/08/1990
From: Feigenbaum T
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GL-90-01, GL-90-1, NYN-90108, NUDOCS 9005110276
Download: ML20042G251 (16)
v • d • e


Text

.

L', .'.

  • New Hampshire Ted C. F:* _ ir:m Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer NYN- 90108 May 8, 1990 t

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Document Control Desk

References:

(a) Facility Operating License No. NPF-86, Docket No. 50-443 (b) USNRC Generic Letter No. 90-01 dated January 18, 1990,

' Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Imp 6ct Survey'

Subject:

R6sponr.e to NRC Generic Letter 90-01 Gentlemen Generic Letter 90-01 requested the voluntary submittal of infomation regarding the impact on utility resources of inspections and audits performed by regulatory agencies, other outside organizations and internal groups.

Enclosure 1 to this letter contains estimates of time impact on Seabrook Station personnel regarding the topics as identified in the Generic Letter. The information is presented in the format of completed questionnaire sheets as suggested by the Generic Letter.

To date, there has been no significant OSHA or Department of Transportation-interface with New Hampshire Yankee. In response to an INPO concern, New Hampshire Yankee has not included information regarding INPO Assistance Visits in this response.

If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Mr. Geoffrey Kingston at (603) 474-9521, extension 3371.

Very truly yours,

~

f/f& 4 /M Ted C. Feigenbaum Enclosure 7

i 9005110276 g % 43 PDR ADOCK PDC g/$ {

P- ,

O hw Hompshire Yonkee Divhion of Public Service Company d New Hampshire P.O. Box 300

  • Seabrook, NH 03874
  • Telephone (603) 474 9521
p. ' ;g ;n" e

'U 4

y~ ; ' ', ,-.
u. . ,

'i

.s"-

g A7 l United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 8, 1990  ;

Attentiont Document Control Desk Page 2 M

'ces Mr. Thomas T. Martin 'l Regional Administrator United' States Nuclear Regulatory Commission J  ; Region I L . .

l 475 Allendale Road,

' King of Prussia,-PA- 19406 Mr. Victor Nerses.fProject Manager

~

ff J Project Directorate I-3 Fri. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commisalon-Division of-Reactor Projects n., .. Washington,=DC 20555 si ,

i: Mr. Noel Dudley l'"

NRC Senior Resident inspector P.O. Box 1149'

-Seabrook.-NH 03874 1

i c

4 s-(

.l

's le l

,ih '

's

- - - . . , - . . - . -. .. ._ . . , _ ~ ,. LA

. y . . m i b

.g\ll': , 1-* i.

.;- j.,. .

'k' New Hampshire' Yankee

, May 8, 1990 k'[

lf, y <

Enclosure 1 to NYN-90108 Comoleted NRC Renulatory Tmnact Survey ~

O Ouestionnaire Sheets E

/

EP2LtLt-

1. Unless otherwise stated, management time in Question 5 Parts. (a)- .through (e).- of each

. questionnaire is expressed in units of hours per

' manager per year - instead of percentage of total annual time.

f 2. In Question 5, Part (b),: .the : title " Plant-Manager' includes the Assistant Plant Manag9r, and in Part (d), the title ' Corporate Vice President" includes Executive Directors.

.s.

.. y a i

I 4

b I

k J

t+-

~b

7 ,- -

WRC itenulatory Imanact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: NRC Team Inspections *
2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? 6 team inspections per year. Includes 1 team l Insnection for the annual emernency response exercise and 1 team inspection for emergency precaredness nian imnlementation review.
3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Operational readiness.

emernency nrenaredness. event evaluations. construction assessments.

allenation investinations.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

L Emergency Plan implementation review 2 people for 1 week.

Emgrgency Plan exercise evaluation: 6 neople for 2 days.

Other NRC Team inspections: 2-6 people for 1-2 weeks per inspection.

5. Approxinate hours per year which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described'in Item No. 1:
a. Plant Department Heads 320 (number involved) 18
b. Plant Manager 40
c. Corporate Department Heads 160 (number involved) __20
d. Corporate Vice Presidents 160 (number involved) 4 l e. Chief Nuclear Officer 40 i

1

?

1 1

I '* Includes NRC evaluations of emergency preparedness annual exercise and program  !

implementation.

i i

NRC Regulatory Innect Surty_t Ouestionnaire. Sheet

1. Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: NR( . Resident. Renfonal and Headouarters Inspections (other than Team InsosLtions).
2. Based on actual experience over the past seie';al years, about how cf ten is this activity conducted? 6 inspections ver month durinn construction completion and pre-operational testinna 2-4 inspectionn ner month since core load.
3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Construction pre-operational and low-nower testina and all aspects of plant operational activity.
4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

3 - 2 inspectors for up to 1 week ner inspection. (Resident inspector activities are continuous.)

5. Approximate hours per year which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item No. 1:
a. Plant Department Heads 480 (number involved) 15
b. Plant Manager 144
c. Corporate Department Heads 120 (number involved) 5
d. Corporate Vice Presidents _ 260 (number involved) 4
e. Chief Nuclear Officer 25

\

_ _ _.m_

3" '

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet 1.- Types of inspection, audit or evaluation EPA / State of New Hampshire inspections conducted in connection with the National Pollution Discharge ,

Elimination System (NPDES) vermit.

2. Based cm actual experience over the past several years, about how of ten is this activity conducted? I inspection ner year (inspections began _ _ _

in 1989).

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: A review of discharge control records. nrocedures and sampline streams,
4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

1 - 2 inspectors. 4 days nor year.

5. Approximate hours per year which the following managers must spend in -

direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity I

described in Item No. 1:

a. Plant Department Heads - 20 (number involved) 3
b. Plant Manager 2
c. Corporate Department Heads __J O (number involved) 2
d. Corporate Vice Presidents 6 (number involved) 4
e. Chief Nuclear Officer 1

,c NRC Regulatory Imnact Surver 9223ticanaire Sheet b

1. Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: Federal Emernency Manenement Agency (FEMA) evaluation of emergency plan implementrtion and biennial exercise.
2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is
this activity conducted? Exercise evaluations every other year. Plan implementation evaluation
8 evaluations Der year.
3. Operations /Cor.struction areas covered: _ Biennial exercise and clan implementation details such as procedures. resources. letters of anreement. facilities and traininn.

1 I

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

1-2 people. 2 days per evaluation.

5. Approximate hours per year which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item No. 1:
a. Plant Department Heads 0 (number involved) ,
b. Plant Manager 0
c. Corporate Department Heads 60 (number involved) 3
d. Corporate Vice Presidents 120 (number involved) 2
e. Chief Nuclear Officer 20 Note: For the Plant Manager and Plant Department Heads, time spent on the biennial exercise is included under the category NRC Team Inspections.

1

If!

8s NRC.Reauletolr..lmpact Surver  ;

Ouestionnaire Sheet ,

1

- i.

[_.

'1. Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: State of New Hamnshire: ' Air '

Resources Permit ,

i

!- :2. . Based on actual experience over the past several years,.about how often is

Insoections are conducted once every 3 years this activity conducted?

l- Efor oermit renewal.

A

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: Auxiliary and heatina boilers  !

and the emergency diesel nenerators are insnected, b

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long): >

Tvofcally. this inspection involves 1 or 2 State insoectors for a maximum of 1 day, ,

t

5. . Approximate hours per year which the following managers must spend-in i direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity '!

described in Item No.-1:

a. Plant Department Heads 4 (number involved) 2
b. Plant Manager 2
c. Corporate Department Heads 0 (number involved) ,
d. Corporate Vice Presidents 1 (number involved) -1
e. Chief Nuclear Officer. 0

-i r

[

5

,m.

v? . ~ . . .

4

=*

/, ,

NRC Reaulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet

1. - Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: INPO Evaluations of Corporate Offices and Station Staff.

. 2. Based on actual experience over the past several-years, about how often is this activity conducted? ADoroximately one evaluation every 12 to 18 months. ,

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: All aspects of construction and operation have been covered.
4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

Corporate Evaluation: 6 - 8 people for 1 week.

Statien Staff Evaluation: 8 - 10 people for 2 weeks.

5. Approximate hours per year which the following managers must spendLin direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity' described in. Item No. 1
a. Plant Department Heads 200 (number involved) 18
b. Plant Manager 40
c. Corporate Department Heade 120 (number involved) ,

10

d. Co::porate Vice Presidents 175 (number involved) 4
e. Chief Nuclear Officer 10 1

f Nfli) ,

& ,; 31g '

4- pp ,. ,

t.1 *

"~

NRC Renulatory Innact Survel Ouestionnaire Sh,ggi.

s

1. - Types of inspection, audit.or evaluation: American Nuclear Insurers (ANI)

-nuclear liabilliv insnections. __ _

s

^)

~

2. Based on actual exper1ence over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? -One inspection;per year, y

=,. -

l

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: __gpergtlons. maintenance. ._

ingtrumentation, health physic h chemistry._qyylity ntegrams.

0i.," gngipeerine, etc. Air aspects o.? nlant staff and corpor.3te technical agnpnet activi_ty.  !

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):. .

1-8_neoplet 1-3.. Ovs per year.

5. Approximate . hours per year which the following managers must: spend in -

direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity [

described in Item No. 1: ,

a. Plant Department Heads 60__ (number involved) 12 b ., Plant Manager ,_

2

c. Corporate Department Heads 12 (number. involved) 4
d. Corporate Vice Presidents 4 (number involved) 2
e. Chief Nuclear Officer 1

@x; I4 1 ; f

" J l J

} ,?

e, .o y l [,0 l

'h.;;.,  ;--

^.

, <=.

l: NRC Renulatory Imnact Survey Questionnaire Sheet  ;

i- - 1. Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: American Nuclear Insurers

'(ANI): fire protection inspections, t

y- 2. Based on' actual experience over the past several years, about how often-is y1 this activity. conducted? 2 inspections ner year.

4 k

?

l l 3.- Operations / Construction ~ areas covered: Fire protection systems and area-

, tours to review notentini fire hazards.

)- t-

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):  ;

.+i 1-2 inspectors. 3 days per inspection. .

s..

5. Approximate hours per year which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity ,

described.in Item No. 1: <

+

a. -Plant Department Heads *

(number involved). 4 ,

. b. Plant Manager 4

c. Corporate Department Heads- 2 .(number involved) 2 L d. Corporate Vice Presidents 1 (number involved) 1  ;
c. . Chief Nuclear Officer i g

D f i, t .

'W.

  • QT +,

' r _

jI, -[ 5. ' <

T,.=

[Yf!'

gg. -.;-

[p; ^ -.m . .

q

. NRC Regulatory .Imnact Survey l

.. Questionnaire Sheet +

C 1'. Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: American Nuclear Insurers (ANI)

Property Insurance Inspections: PSM Program (Unit 1). POISE Program (Unit 2). -!

4

. 2. Based on actual experience.over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? _PSM 50 days Der year, POISES 2 inspections __

ner year. -i

-l 3, Operations / Construction areas covered _All niant eauipment is subiect '

to inspection. 1

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

PSM l'norson. 50 days per year.

POISE: 1 person. 1-3 days ner inspection.

+

' ' 5, Approximate houts per year which the following managers must spend in #

direct involvement'before, during, and-in response to the activity described in Item No. 1:

a, . Plant Department Heads 40 (number involved) 4

b. Plant Manager, 4
c. Corporate Department Heads 6 (number involved) 3
d. Corporate Vice Presidents /. -/ number involved) 2 y
e. ' Chief Nuclear Officer 2 y

i h

4 ____ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _m._________

6'<

pdy g' bo t ,

, x i NRC lenulatory Imoact Survey-Questionnaire Sheet pp 1. Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: Audits, inspections and OL . evaluations nerformed by the ISEG in accordance with Technical

[ '

/SneQ{jcations. Section 6.

, 2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Continuous 1v for a total of 12, 480 man-hours .

ner year. ~i t

i 3.. Operations / Construction areas covered: Station and industry operatinn- >

g experience review and other certir..nt aspects of Station operation and j sunnort activities.

i 4.- Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

, f people, 2080 hours0.0241 days <br />0.578 hours <br />0.00344 weeks <br />7.9144e-4 months <br /> ner year plus an estimated additional 9200 e associated man-hours ner year not includinn that discussed in #5 below.

5. Approximate hours per year wnich the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item No. 1:
a. Plant Department Heads. 315 (number involved) 15
b. Plant Manager 40
c. ' Corporate Department Heads 100 (number involved) 5
d. Corporate V 1 Presidents 90 (number involved) 3
e. Chief Nu... . vfficer 10 1

Y

Il ,

--'c [->< ,'

i.

j! ,"

KRC Regulatory Impact Survey L

Questionnaire Sheet

? '1. . Types of inspection, audit or evaluation: Audits performed Der the operational Ouality Assurance Program implementing the reouirements of 10CFR50 Anoendix B and Technical Specifications. Section 6.

2.. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? 24 audits per year.

.3. ' Operations / Construction areas covered: All aspects of plant operation Programs and Procedures affectina Nuclear Safety. Operations. Health Physicsi Security and Emergency Preparedness. .

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long):

3 people per' audit, . Audit is typically conducted over a 5-day pe rl_od .

Total auditor man-hours includinn oreparation, review. report writine and follow-un verification are 300-400 man-hours per audit.

5. Approximate. hours per year which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity

' described in Item No. 1:

a. Plant Department Heads 240 (number involved) 15
b. Plant Manager 80
c. Corporate Department Heads 80 (number involved) 6 d.- Corporate Vice Presidents 60 (number involved) 2

-e. Chief Nuclear Officer 10 4

-i

. m..___._.....

EC #

y .

p': :

NRC Renulatory Ianact Surver g'testionnaire Sheet

-1. Types of-inspection, audit or evaluation: Surveillances and Inspections-performed-per the Operational Ouality Assurance Pronrac which implements the reouirements of 10CFR50 Appendix B.

2. BasedRon actual experience over the past several years, about how often'is' this activity conducted? _Approximately 1000 surveillances and 2200 inspections per year.

7

.3. . Operations / Construction areas covered: All aspects of plant operation Programs and Procedures affectinn Nuclear Shfety. Operations. Security

, end' Emergency Preparedness.

4. Extent of the-sctivity (how many people, for how long):

Tne duration of surveillances rannes between 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> and 1 week.

Surveillances are conducted by either 1 or 2 people. Inspections tvolcally involve 1 person for 1-2 hours.

5. . Approximate hours per year which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described.in Item No la L .
a. Plant Department Heads 650 (number involved) 17__
b. Plant Manager 40
c. Corporate Department Heads 50 (number. involved) 3__ _

d.- Corporate Vice Presidents 25 (number involved) 2__

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 4 e

i_

b b

_ L.___---_----_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ . . _ _ - _ _ _ _ . - _ , _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .- _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _

Ts .

f,l s '

'4 (h M L , . -

p; j; .jpC Renulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire Sheet i

Types of.4.nspection,' audit or evaluation: _Delf Assessment Evaluations

~

1.

performed by the NHY Independent Review Team and Environmental Review Board. ,

i k 2.' Based on actual experience over the past several years about how often is-this activity conducted? 10 evaluations per year.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: _ Operations. Maintenance. J Instrumentation. Engineering; Technical Support. Chemistry. Health  !

Physics. Radwaste Training. Emergency Preparedness. Environmental.

4. Extent of--the activity (how many people, for ho. long): j 3' man-months-per evaluation, i

.)

5. Approximate hours per year which the'following managers must spend in ]

direct involvement before, during, and in response to.the activity .

described in Item No. 1: .)

i

n. Plant Department Heads 150 (number involved) 12 j

~ -;

.b. Plant Manager 100 'q

c. Corporate Department Heads 60 (number involved) 5 l l
d. Corpot.<te Vice Presidents 125 (number involved) 4
  1. .i

.e. Chief Nuclear Officer 15 .

i i

l l'

1' f

V! i a:: >

\

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20042G251&oldid=2566460"