ML20042B080
| ML20042B080 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1982 |
| From: | Scott D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20042B077 | List: |
| References | |
| 81-264, NUDOCS 8203240541 | |
| Download: ML20042B080 (4) | |
Text
x Comm:nwealth Edison 2
Dr:sd:n Nuclear Power Statlin R.R #1
~
Morris, lillr. '160450
)
Telephone 815/942 2920 r
Date l I fi_1Mb$
l994 s
e DJS LTR:
81-264
/. V
.,x
'Qq' ll-
[_
'q'a o.
n.
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director I'j:
c j' ',
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
s 1/
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission D
h5
, s.
Washington, D.C.
20555 sex g-_
Subject:
Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures-for Dresden Station Units 1, 2, and 3; NRC Docket Nos. 50-10, 50-237, and 50-249
References:
(a) D. J. Scott letter to H. R. Denton, dated March 12, 1981 (b) Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Appendix E, Part V
Dear Mr. Denton:
Enclosed are ten (10) copies of revisions to Dresden Station Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.
No return of transmittals is necessary.
Sincerely, f
D.a.
Scott Station Superintendent Dresden Nuclear Power Station
- DJS:TGB:mt Enclosures cc:
T. Blackmon File /NRC File / Numerical OI KO 1
s i i
IlIC 02 e i 820324054i 820318 PDRADOCKOS000g F
l I
DAP 9-2 DRESDEN STATI0ft PROCEDURE ROUTING Revision 11 PROCEDURESCOORDINATORNOTiFIED O n-3
~
o^
l
'index Number Unit Procedure E#T/ /SO-C /
Revision No.
2 h
Title W
$ $*bNY, YSSf/ O &w
~
Req'd. Compl. Date Record Retention Requirements:
Action Item No.
1.
Is a Surveillance affected?
M/S l
(Submit DAP 11-2 pgs. 5 or 6)
Modification No.
2.
Is a Station Record Type being established?
y6 Draft Review:
a.
If "yes", specify record Deletion?
F#
retentien requirements.
Posted Procedu're?
yo v
(as per Tech. Spec. Sec.
Posted Location?
NO 6.5, ANSI N45.2.9 App. A
, Typing Required?
yE S,
or DAP 2-3)
Index Change Requireal yE6 b.
If "yes", obtain record type
'g number " (see R3 Coordinator) 11f 1.
~
Originatgr_____,______,,,,____________________________,,
3 Routinc
~ 2. J L2 0A fm TAC 8.\\Q bwd Wb Department Supervisor Tech. Staff Supervisor 3.
Y ik 9.
Y
//
l Verifier
/
4 Su e ' lance Coorcinator/
/
s
/
4.
'M M We,
5.
13.'
10.
-[
[8 Procedures CoorcThator I
- t. Asst Sqf, Rad./ Chem. Sup.
M 2 42s33 ij,
.Jm1 giv S.
Procecures Manager Op rating En ineer'or SRO 7.
[
12.
L(b
,OI
__951212a ter_12te2 f teasl_____________________________!ta tig_gg___________
j TRANSMITTAL RECEIPT [ [/ [
ster No.
M//
/M -(/
&. /
APPROVED REMOVE:
l INSERT:
MAR 01'82 gg /00 -C/
&y l
g,
! 5ereby acccc '.ep r:cei t of the above.
(Sign and return this fann to the Procedures Manager.)
F W 9-3 18 of 24 I
i
~. _ _ _
D%P 9-2 90CEDURE HISTORY Procedure E[T/
/d 0 - C / Rev. No.
1 Description of Procedure Revision or of New Procedure flI Y n
/7m & A rr j.,
ada Gsse ra I A/A A
X.1.14 7^ /sWP36s-/
L mL L.JJ s i xL'.L L no las
& A s, n
- ss WJ
/a J Je '4Lh>A Mk ya;,g
~
r
- 01) E/Ad o ont ML
~L A mk=
f/ /
/
/
- (/
Mn s,
.n~n f
/
Justification for New or Revised Procedure
<nJw sJd' A M J s M LiJ1-
/ 0 k b A d n- =4 JM c &
2 Pbwdwaa A a d a.a 4 8 d J f c e s L 2 e ~ X '.
s J -
~ /2ED fO! A M 3
//
//
Supportive References Form 9-2B APPROVED O
MAR 01'82
~
19 of 24 v.v.S.R.
9
.we
..e.
n_
.e
.n m
l OAP 9-2 Revision 11 SAFETY EVAL!!ATI0tt (10 CFR 50 53)
\\...
l Does this procedure / revision ccnstitute a change to orocedures as described in Safety Anaivsis ?.cecrt?
l No Od Yes ( )
e I
iis a change in the Tecnnical lSoecification involved?
No ( )
4 u
SAFETY EVALUATICl{: Answer tne folicwing questions wi tn a "yes" or "no", and provlde specific reascns juseilying the decisIcn:
~'
Is the probability of an occurrence, the consequence of an acci-1.
dent, or malfunction of safety related equipment, as previously evaluated in the Final Safety Analysis Report, increased?
Yes d No, because:
g g
&n d p.
is the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different 2.
^
[]
type than any previcusly evaluated in the Final Safety Analysis
~
~
5 0
Report created?
Yes g Mo, because:
f Is the margin of safety, as defined in the basis for any Tech-3
[:o,because:
nical Specification, reduced?
Yes
[
All Answers tto K Any Answer
- Yes ( )
tr f~
l Request and receive !!uclear APPROVED negulatory Cocmission authorf:stion for change.
- ii 01'82
- =
I Authori:ation Received ( }
k
?
initiate ?reccoure i
- NOTE:
Any answer checked "yes" Imele ents-ion l
shou?d be retorted in the Performed 3y
/
annual recert to :he t.t.
Date hMd FO.'Ut a-2c.
.!i 23 of 24
' ~ * ' ' " * '
_-.=-=.e.,-.
,