ML20042A623
| ML20042A623 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1982 |
| From: | Seidle W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20042A617 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-368-82-02, 50-368-82-2, NUDOCS 8203230621 | |
| Download: ML20042A623 (1) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Arkansas Power and Light Company Docket:
50-368 Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 License: NPF-6 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted during the period of February 1-5, 1982, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following violation was identified:
Surveillance Test Identification 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires that " activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures,
... of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures,...." Licensee Procedure 1000.09, Revision 3 (8/26/81), " Surveillance Test Program Control,"
requires, in paragraph 5.6, that Department Heads " review new, revised, and additional Technical Specifications and other licensing commitments for surveillance testing requirements, and ensure that the Surveillance Test Coordinator is informed through the use of Surveillance Test Program Revision Sheets."
Contrary to the above, on February 2, 1982, the Unit 2 surveillance test requirement delineated in paragraph 4.4.4.2(G) of the Technical Specifi-cations, which was part of Ammendment 20 to the Unit 2 Technical Specifi-cations and had been issued March 3, 1981, was found not to have been transmitted by the Maintenance Manager to the Surveillance Test Coordinator.
This is a Severity Level V violation.
(Supplement I.E.)
(50-368/8202-01)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Arkansas Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which will be taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as ammended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
~
)
n Dated:
March 4, 1982 W. C. Seid, Chief Reactor Pr ect Branch 2 0$$0$0fg PDR i