ML20041G134
| ML20041G134 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/19/1982 |
| From: | Foster W, Mcneill W, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041G128 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900387 NUDOCS 8203190307 | |
| Download: ML20041G134 (15) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION:
GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900387/81-02 INSPECTION DATE(S): 12/14-18/81 INSPECTION ON-SITE HOURS: 60 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: General Atomic Company Special Products ATTN:
Mr. P. E. Bissonnette General Manager Post Office Box 81608 San Diego, CA 92138 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:
Mr. J. G. Kelly, Quality Assurance Manager TELEPHONE:
(714) 455-3205 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT:
Radiation Monitors NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Gas or area radiation monitors and liquid or process radiation monitors for approximately 50 reactor sites.
Some of the equipment is Class 1E.
,i Willa _ N.Yb11//
4//3/AL.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
y, g, gcNeill, Components Section (CS)
Date OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
W. E. Foster, Reactive Inspection Section (RIS)
~
I ~'
U.'Potapovs, Acting Chipf, CS APPROVED BY-Date i
INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
B.
SCOPE:
This inspection was made as a result of the issuance of 10 CFR Part 21 reports pertaining to:
(1) Area Monitor Countrate Assemblies, RP-2C, that had f
been furnished to the Zion Nuclear Power Station Units Nos. 1 and 2; and (2) Rockbestos Coaxial Cable, RSS-6-104, that had been fu,nished to numerous nuclear power stations.
The inspection also addressed a report of inadequate electrical insulation on Ex-Core Neutron Flux Detectors that had been furnished to the Waterford Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3.
QA programmatic areas included in the inspection were manufacturing process control, nonconformances and corrective action, control of special processes, and status of previous inspection findings.
DESIC ATED ORIGINAL ccrurica ny.v@KM ihb 8203i90307 820226 PDR GA999 ENVGAT 99900387 PDR J
GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION ORGANIZATION'.
SAN DIEGO, CALfFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900387/81-02 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 6 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 5 in Section 5 of the QA Manual, unbracketed operations were not always performed in sequence; e.g., the Traveler for Process Air Monitor (351-1801-01) serial number 3 had Operation 25 (burn-in test) dated October 11, 1981, and Operation 20 dated November 3, 1981.
2.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 3 in Section 2 of the QA Manual, the standard and project Integrated Mamtfacturing and Quality Plans did not describe the test procedures and standards contained in the applicab-!e contract requirements listed in Service Request 171207.
3.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 5 in Section 11 of the QAM Manual, inspection did not perform the required verification of all testing activities, as evidenced by the following examples:
a.
A test operation was signed and dated on the Traveler for Particulate, Iodine and Gas Detector (373-1101-03) serial number 1, without an impression of the " Test Performance Copy" stamp having been signed and dated on the approved test procedure.
b.
The required entries had not been made in Qualification Test Procedure 0360-2082.
c.
Incorrect and missing information was noted in regard to Test Report 0359-9004 dated September 30, 1981.
4.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 4.1 in Section 14 of the Manufacturing Operations Manual, Travelers did not reflect the appropriate document numbers, as evidenced by the following examples:
a.
Revision A of drawing 373-0522-00 was erroneously entered into the Traveler for Control Room Cabinet (373-0501-02) serial number 1.
t b.
Revision 1 of Test Procedure 0373-9003 was erroneously listed in the Traveler for Particulate, Iodine and Gas Detector (373-1101-01) serial number 1.
J
f GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION ORGANNON:
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900387/81-02 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 6 5.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50. and paragraphs 5.3 in Section 11 and 5.2.5 in Section 15 of the QA Manual, Clean-up Sheets (CUSS) generated by the Test Department are not entered on Travelers, as evidenced by the following examples:
a.
CUS T10000 305 was not entered on the Traveler for Liquid Monitor (373-2501-01) serial number 1.
b.
CUS 7804 and 7901 were not entered on the Traveler for Process Air Monitor (351-1801-01) serial number 3.
c.
CUS 7172 was not entered on the Traveler for Area Monitor (373-3801-01) serial number 2.
6.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, and para-graph 5.3 in Section 10 and paragraph 5.2.5 in Section 15 of the QA Manual, material is being released for subsequent assembly with discrepancies unresolved, for example, a CUS 4655 was issued on a micro-processor.
This microprocessor was assembled into a Process Area Monitor Assembly although the CUS was unresolved.
7.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 5.2.8 in Section 15 of the QA Manual, CUS 7804 was not signed and dated, as required, to denote completion of corrective actions on Process Area Monitor (351-1801-01) serial number 3.
8.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paracraph 2 in Section 16 of the QA Manual, those discrepancies coded as engineering errors and those identified by Test Department CUSS in the test reports on the Test Procedures and Failure Log are not subject to monthly review for corrective action analysis.
9.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 2 in Section 9 of the QA Manual, personnel performing special processes were observed to have been either not qualified for the process, or l
their qualifications were not a matter of record, i
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
l l
The Traveler for the Moving Filter Particulate Iodine Gas Monitor, Drawing No. 0373-1101-03, Revision A, indicates that calibration is to be performed in accordance with Test Procedures Nos. 0360-9916A and 0360-9919A.
The 8
inspector noted that an additional procedure, No. ELA281-9001, Revision K, was also used to provide step-by-step details of calibration.
However, the latter procedure was not identified on the Traveler or referenced in the identified procedures.
As a result of the foregoing; the inspector was unable to determine the legitimacy of the usage of the latter procedure.
i l
)
T GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION ORGANIZATION:
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900387/81-02 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 6 0.
STATUS OF PREVIOU5 INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-01):
Travelers did not fully control the sequences of operations, operations required, and dating of operations performed.
A review of a sample of eight travelers found all required operations listed and dating of operations performed.
In regard to the sequence of operations one nonconformance was identified.
2.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-01):
Conformance to contract requirements was not fully inspected in the areas of pneumatic tests, skid mount nuts, motor performance, and signal reproducibility.
General Atomic has obtained waivers on the pneumatic tests and motor performance.
A clarification of the skid mount nuts has been obtained and test data has been analyzed to prove signal reproducibility.
3.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-01):
Some documents were not controlled in particular Wire Lists.
A procedure OP-302 has been implemented to control Wire Lists and other manufacturing aids.
A review of Wire Lists in current use found no further problems.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
Manufacturing Process Control - A recent Service Request was reviewed and the nine travelers generated based on that Service Request for Wide Range Gas Monitors.
The translation of contract requirements into Traveler operations was verified.
The use of Integrated Manufacturing and Quality Plans was verified; however, a nonconformance was identified in regard to the plans.
Receiving inspection activities were reviewed for four bought components.
In process inspection and test activities were inspected.
A nonconformance was identified in the area of test controls.
Another nonconformance was identified on the entering of correct information on Travelers.
In regard to this nonconformance, it was noted that the Document and Drawing List for the drawing in question was also in arror.
The testing was done to the most current revisions of the procedures, not that identified on the Travelers.
2.
Control of Special Procerses - The qualification log and a sample of nine operators found with soldering equipment in the shop.
A review was also done of the solder procedure and the operator's qualification t
cards.
In this area one nonconformance was identified.
3.
Nonconformances and Corrective Actions - The nonconformances are 5
identified on Clean-Up Sheets.
These are later analyzed for trends and corrective action.
The nonconformances identi'ied on eight Travelers were reviewed.
Eleven recent Material Review Board Reports and seven recent Corrective Action Requests were inspected.
In this area five nonconformances were identified.
I i
P 1
1
ORGANIZATION GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVZSION
' SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900387/81-02 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 6 4.
Follow Up On 10 CFR Part 21 Reports a.
RSS-6-104 Coaxial Cable Failures had occurred during qualification testing of a newly designed RD-6 Detector; however, they were considered random.
Preliminary investigation indicated that the high voltage power supply providing 1800 volts direct current to the RD-6 Detector had been overloaded and damaged.
Subsequent engineering tests showed that the RSS-6-104 cable which carries the high voltage to the detector had short-circuited.
X-rays revealed that several locations in the five foot sections of the high voltage and signal cables could have caused the short circuit.
Further investigation of the general performance of the RSS-6-104 cable revealed the severity of the problem.
Corrective actions are in progress with customers and the supplier.
Defective cables will be replaced by the supplier and General Atomic.
A procedure had been initiated and implemented to conduct a more extensive inspection of the RSS-6-104 cable at receiving inspection in order to preclude recurrence.
Corrective actions and preventive measures are considered to be
- adequate, b.
Area Monitor Count Rate Assembly, RP-2C Four resistors were overstressed when the internal hign voltage power supply was adjusted above 700 volts direct current (VOC);
the normal operating voltage was about 850 VDC.
An engineering analysis identified requirements and appropriate replacement resistors.
Corrective action included the release of an Engineering Change Order Rework Instruction Sheet for serial numbers 001 through 075 and providing parts and rework instructions to the Commonwealth Edison Company for the Zion Nuclear Power Plant, Units Nos. 1 and 2.
An Engineering Change Order had been released and affected drawings had been revised to preclude recurrence.
The
> inspector observed that hardware was being manufactured in accordance with the revised drawings.
9 Corrective actions and preventive measures are considered to be adequate. However, during the effort to verify that the latest configuration of the area monitor had been subjected to qualifica-tion testing, it was determined that the Qualification Test Procedure (QTP) had not been completed as required.
The responsible engineer informed the inspector that documentation of more recently conducted qualification tests had been completed as required.
The inspector reviewed a recently completed QTP and determined that it, too, had not been completed as required.
This is considered to be a nonconformance and has been included in Nonconformance 8.3.
J
GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVIS10N ORGANIZADON:
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNZA REPORT NO.: 99900387/81-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 6 of 6 5.
Follow Up on a Regional Request Inadequate Electrical Insulation on Ex-Core Neutron Flux Detectors General Atomic Company (GAC) had not been apprised of the problem at the Waterford Nuclear Power Station; however, they had discussed this insulation with the Combustion Engineering Company (CEC) as early as August 1977.
In October 1977, CEC issued a purchase order to GAC to substitute the insulation and shorten the detector holder assembly tailpieces of the eight detectors at Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2.
A CEC Certification of Equipment, dated October 14, 1977, attests to completion of the task.
PERSONS CONTACTED Company Dates M /M"/(/IN Docket / Report No. N M 3 h"Od Inspector Mkd.//
Page
/ of M
NAME(Please Print)
TITI.E(Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print) k JG. VELL/
%p. Dou,3y $<g.
G g.
A TE. docAMorEB G.A.Dio,sio43k.
/
- bJ. 7~
do*1A9s-zwecero2 t F. d.
fnantesV hwreroms //M k' 2 6 -
Moketson R@
Mcue.
- DE.
AJ40 h e // d e wT M 9
Ktrac Q.e. s oce.
DA Swnffet MnwnerarA larsoaG4 D
6)E/ 5 T}zoseer 14<#.
(
R 3~ DetzwRins O.A.
Eoss
\\
~
5G Aenu5 Tnq1ecT-Em
\\
/3 (4exias Satars 7)epr M,e.
7R bJ/AIS 6 EM6 N92 e
frees su n=
eas.
)
L DeustndD
~PoedilRSEikPR l
nP Bissonneric GENEfAL for.
f Ae AlsoJ sort L)g Eas' 1
k ATTD1DED EXIT' / MEET //16
)
f e
l e
b Ny b
a a
c l
tN i
~
tt p
~
~
Y F
of 4
mnnp i
l o
eeea l
t mm iuuf WE ccI l oo(
l
/
ADD ee iE I
1 f
i n
I l
7 g lE R g 5
tff o ih,1 nooi a
P Z.
5 l2
~
~
~
e s
i 3
/
- ueei I
3 t
t sqpt v f1 r#
7 neyae 1
e l'
mSTDR 6
F A
l u
lo....
35o C1234 T
0l o
E 0o E
I f
I A Av
/
D VA
[
2 '5 d 3
L T
i
/
/
f t
l 8
P k'
Mh S
S C
e l
G A
i N
6 h
f
)/
( f a
t 1
l 3
t a
C 4
e e
o o T i
S g E T
/
o S
0 O
1 f
l t
2 9
O o
a f
t f
/
0 D
4
}
L G {o e o S 5
o 1
3 S
i E
E
/
t f
c 2 d 8 l
T l
n I
C D
4 f
G N
E 3
J SO (E A
J c
A 4
X B
1 5
3 3
E U
A e/ D 2 0
3 3
3 3
3 1
7 M 5 T
5 S
S
/
3 7
7
/
5
/
1 E
7]
r 0 6 c
o D
3 M
L G
(
f f
a l
G C
'l E S
E T
)
M I
y 4
t U
T V-s 1
r C
F
/
- t D
a 6 A L l
s O
U D
d 9
s D 6 d D
A $ f A F
A e
o c
f F G
e D
n M
A f
t r
J l
d G T 0 A X
G A
f J
i lA 0 G
K y
r
]
L A T E /
G A
/
ro f
r R D
)l?
em i
T S
A de c
l b
l i
rM e
D '
G U
f-l O
p O V E
k E
l l
l S
c Tt 6
L S lA A e E O
T sa
(
I anr hrer 4 k A n L A
T.
0 cet e 1
V) 6 E
U F
rtth A
R R R V
G i
unet
)(
$S6MM'MA D
]
b h e
O E E
t T
M n L
l M
A E A
D 7
5678 E
1 N
T l
^
no i
s t
e ael
\\,
p cra e
2 9 7 G 3M 3 8 8
y gi u u y
Y Tnfd n ii ea t wccM e
naeo l
erprA u
5 Y h mDSPQ u
r d
o o
s
/
o
/o 0
c S
M a
8 l
T 3
o...
b
/
~
W E P-D1234 c
/
1 e
e e
p p
8 z
o
/
3C n
c 7S
4 b
5 o
.=
m h.
5
.2
- =
k
{
k
\\
[
C
- ss-t i
b h
d e'c
$2 5
h k o*
iGi
+
- t t f i
l l
e s c
4 s s d
geaa g
% g.gcee w 5aaAa
}O os l
Y j
8 6
E J
5 1
2 2
o su V
C O^
v v
e e,
k h
e e
2 e
3 d
f Q
5 b %
v 0
L W
t
(- e h y (p
Q M CC 5;
d 2
u s
e v
=
d g
h,y C (
Vt e
Q s
e o v
=
w w
u oN s
2 s
- v h
k 6 h h h (e k
(g$
}e 1
jp g
o s t e g
5 0$ %4 1 d l g d
2 I
/
s :
me 2
g e g.ef y
, by s
if i
t w b
N $
%s 1
Eg pe c
c e s e
e nem s
{
3 esta 5 %' _;s N
e m w
@e 3
s asas k
b k h h hY, idua i
- e m e rew,53
$,.9 v
% e cr o-w.w w e ~ w N v-e-
)w L
{i
~
e "c
T2 02 i
5 l*
wo o
)
I L.
7 0,
1 e4 Yd M
SaaAd h
t
\\
\\
\\
\\
I u
Q
\\
1s e
a an:
=m
f!\\
l z_
e l
r l
o e
b b
a
/
n c
s
$/
l t
4 N
i b
mnnp tt p of 4
l o
eeea f
t n m a uf r f__
t i
t ccI o
l oo(
p ADD
/
i n
ee
{
R g s
tff o 8
/.
e s
nooi a
5-P s
- ueei
/x.
sqpt v 3
neyae mSTDR Z
1 u
l 7-o C1234 y
g g
]2M W
i0 9k e
D E
l T
l C
i H
E A
J I
X B
E U
l6 S
S
/
T E
A L
f l
l A
E T
)
M I
/
y U
T 2
r C
7 a
O d
s D
s A
e F
c ce d
n m
id f
A o
i L
y ro f
r em i
de c
O R s rM e
O p
E E l
S
/
sa
(
L anr M
hrer G
cet e P
rtth fi unet n Q PI LO WTKM 5678 2
l W
n o
i s
t e
ael 2
0 8 S p
cra
\\.
y gi uu W
A Tnfdn w
ii ea t wccM e
naeo erprA l
u n
mDSPQ r
d o
u o
o c
t S
H o...
~ o D1234 c
/
1
~'
o e
e p
p
- h s
c n
c D
S
~
lll1 ll
PERSONS CONTACTED Company Gewen4l 41.% 6 Dates "/i o-is/s, Docket / Report No. fr9,.m /t -ng Inspector U.c. ro14r, Page ' /
of
/
NAME(Please Print)
TIT 1.E(Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print) d Asa r,o /.
fla // O n g; w eerc
- 3. C.:l Povo,*ra l Dannsea 6
C. Fneere Slarr C,e:neen F dower Clen Ic - bott-mewf (c winsI 0 eden
- b. k au e sa nd :
Cle.{n ;< e l L e al T.s,n e, l e n
- 3. k eII, n n,. te n o n a t:L Ass-u
-a r (%Ilen Pnoje < { nan a sen C.
ae v ie n Oa Anal -l 7
l J
Inspector L). E. For le,
Docket N6.197oo s 87 Report No. Bs-c.z Scope /Modulefe ll eu ap_cD_p_sf dd.31 R y e al' DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Tpe TITLE / SUBJECT Dal' R *
- IM * "
I/en N.,
y l
3 Rss L.Io y Ts e e n : n e Isin e c l:c a Tes ]
AcLLL A
TiiI Re,oc nl-S:n,,1:t; e J 'Tizl:s b et L G c A Qal:(2) C ex:nl ca L[er
?hI
__.2 h
i
/
b i o
3 S
Qual Te sl I?eo."4 of R D - L Icn C Gm but Ass v l'o n L otA n J l1s t il t o/is/s s 4
7 We I?c t h L s (c. ne-Rft 6 - / o s c Al 3/16/11 of Iszwer Re\\n);,e A Ca ble Qa s i:{:al;o a 4-li n/ s t Esnman y/u, (ic ) c4 L k 5
L R << k be, rA / s i
(
6 7
C neel:,s u:A RcA hrl.1 AL. I Cdle F' h t ne e hle ns
% /st
(,
9 7
Gesenel Alesic-ESb - R SS fa -Ic 4 Ca ble /n~ ;{-ne r/r z/11 Mt Re c klefles Co. rn :
/7e c # : s d fl ad er.cw dr unort%;~e R 31-6 -10 4. C a l/c S/t t hi 9
7 6
(
Ic b
R e e le berNr (a hlo $l alar '/n/((
- /t o/ t 1 ll C
R..Lbezier calle 6/2 /st
/z 7
7b Rc t l le lor Cc. - n ff - ( te 4. C4 lle /:4:Iw nt Mehf r
- C A u$'e n 4 P-n c% se ni a t : Rss:_h -te a Ar.n R, Rss-l-11e CJia 7/l e/8 !
I3 7
k-75711C Nilfo - 753 o 9-g- % s / f o - 77 c S z I Yrt/qt. 79z y s7 b s/gl. R$s-L-oc s l 9-T Ir 8
Pn.w u emenf R ee u:r:l:o s Alas.- 7 9 i 8 31 '% Ll21; 77 x 7 63 '*/rh t -lus-6 -r o s CitL lo IL 3
h ip.J:., Repoalt. stier.-cre s!'Asht; cre sto'7:1/n cro29%ht;osit>'#Ae/tr
@1
~
Document Types:
umns-1.
Drawing 5.
Purchase 0rder f./M,n mJi o
p t',-
2.
Speci fica t ion 6.
Internal Memo Typq 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter DA oc, 'nd 4.
QA Manua')
8.
Other (Specify-if necessary)
._1
< tac}
A!.
v=. v3 Q
- o 1
i i.
o 1
l 1
t g %.
5 i
i i
i i
R *'
i i
1 4
l l
e.v
.2 i f
I I
a j
d.
l l
l Et: C Y 'I C
l
{
}
b k'
~
e i
p i
i 4
i C
e'T
- ol p
p C
Erc I
l e
i I
l l
l.J lty lcv o,
c c: c-
,-;o l twa
, u, Q
c
- 0) to ** b i O!
et C,,_
\\
d, f x~
i s
N l
N, \\
._ C '
~
, -, w t
e l
\\
N, Ni $a 1 :l
- I ~, w, b,
Q, w\\' ! s I
, e, ~d %
U h $ c' d
m l
i
,, v -
c
,-i i
i i
i y
l l
l l
l d l'
l
~
i i
i i
i i
I
(
e l
lD f
W l
c' 1
t i
}
U, e
i T M M
l l
N l
' 3 N'
i l'
l-I i
<j l
i l
I Q
T h
t N,
rJ
<. 2 f
e$'
aY i
l M,,
N Cl CLl %
9 li D 8
M i
I j
?u l
t, t,
I
.** t) 3
,4 g',
A 4
d
=4 u
s a.l i
u j
V, L
4 i
J t
A
- 4 g
l c
I w
s t
4 k, )
4.* 3I l i $' H
)%
3 l
-Z l
'S i
t 1
I t'
i l
j C'
%d.
t ci C
ai.d 1FM iN t! w ei a
Et v6 l,; 3 N yj A d cJ,d j) q,
! y.u, i
'i
=
w r
sn i
Dl
'd, 53b
- d. fU g
.'N e
5.W i e a ul
.t l
d td yt 9 y Mf Q
- 4 -M h I 5.J g 9>
-[
ml 5
r.
ct.
a%
e
.J_
ee w
g7, m s i i
c)
-J
- 4
- 'A Q.
3 s.
M h
-u
'g' b
Y h
j g -+qa' o.-.
c
-l 4
cl 'd5 g g.,y,.gj 4 g.I "j
"i a
3, t e g g,. p o,
g 8l l
q g
m c
i ~lw qi Q ")
a
'7" ei cy o
o a
c g d $ J, ;e, e
-d""4,i f } u
"--l V
1 y
m.
c; l
8 ul.f } Nd
%. y vl J
' 'I C
Jo Sl J
s' V'
id '
- 7 Z
w g
Y b *f Yk
- 5
+
}
y' f b 1
('
(
t Qc
[
h
(, * *A.s d 9
J u
a (l!x & Yl, -
d
.a N hO eA L O w
5 l
'*8A r
OC s.5,
e
- 4 79 g
4 d
,j; i
e
%,4 a,
.:,q t
- d u
C i
- M e-e s
.r 8
~
c-a
[
sl s s-s e
ri s
w s
w j
<l m
- v wm l
h
- v.,ju
,g cL
~
l
~<.
,,4e o
, s u c; - c; AJ
'd Q.
y %
q &e 6
/
- d 4
5 y
o..
~
4 U f %
c
- A N
\\
\\
5 s
vt *
[
cl
]
Y d..l l
y
-J
=
.x
[
g e G u d r; <) u,,j
-~u
- e. '
8 N
ou W s
(
Lt1 c ts CO g
't k
g o
~
g I e + w c@
1 be ma i
r t
uj g
c
.,l
-e-C.
uL c D
O*
Ps
-"a-N (N
vr3 g
%p I. %
i I
->um=
y C m c) C l
c) L C. L aC e
3 i
I i
i i
l I
l i
I E c m c cr L
v 3
I d
W N O O
J A
N q "! I d ~, y a~
'g o
g R
E' C
I l
!II,;y q~~
"j c
c> - ~ ~
l l
I l
C U
=-
W
t-J O,
2 6 L. JE m
L'
- -
- t e
e
.K g Ac%
se MM g
c) L o e->
.d O M U C1 O CJ O
/
O Cr O) 4 m
9 C O
,e.
0 Q,,
f4 tw 3
N q N
re-P N[
(
y C
J
-d s e
Q t
9 4
9 i
o D
J m
R 4
--a m
i 1
Q 4]
C t
O k
t W
E Z
2 Q
L) i E
W O
i s
x m
a
(
e W
D d
g 9
L m
M N
W G
y N
Z J
g c
W to g
(
e h
E D
s L
y g
o m
O
' (
CJ e
t U
c; e
E Q I
C d
9 y
C e
E $
o h
[
m e
LO w
J.. T O
q d
CJ E e-O c; U
A t
d
'o LE c) e
- @Q c) c,,
o o
c m
ve t
e an r v
h i
eC L 4,
g
.C L CJ L g Q
&g F
U c) M C) a u&Mz I
s c c) M t
4l 4
K g
s CL >~e J O J
t N
.e v
e o
y g
w I
6 e
mese i
y H
A C
O y
0 Q
)
W G
e c) to c) -
(
CL UL r0 e
k y
A g
M N
h Ge 3 3 n
0
&C%D C k
- e ar-CJ m M 3UUE C)
C
<C C) O e--
CJ L aL<
3 E C t.n C. Cr L
O o.
p O
O Q
U D
rs O
M E
m N
C"NMT
)
C M
9 m
a a
s e
O C
U w
B
La -
i) u^; j;;.3" r
(laessasauJt-EJiaads)aa440
'8 LenueW VD V
d aalial t
aanpasoJd
'E 7,y
- 41 omaW Leuaaaul 9
uotaestJtaads 2
J4 o
i
/maa au aapJ0&sey3and g
6utseJO
'l
.sumb
- sadK1 quawn300 r
e tj,j,,
t 1;' n
'M "" * )"N 14!q > '*d '""* PV #f*f *Q * "O " *fl'/f-l a s s - + c t 213 I
Ii 3
.1 tjsg
yafn -^ sty u =fy ejj - o o ? s - 1, c i 313 j
c/
g 9 gjg
'assy n a fl *jj f uv u op*f*g - o o es -s o c 9 73 I
f s
{: :):
< <pj,,
2 13 n o '-n r1.':1 ! ""d Fo *
''O * *ll*tt l "T*t*o " rs - + o t 313 1
9 ci,s,,
t 6 f s c 9 n * **U f"av * ' * >>d s
t up/c,
at:5 1 1<I y ' m *:1'titTS * *:1*)"1 f ' * ':t* T f *U -D '2l4 6 * *N ~'yI 3 3 S
- )
cijg 2,g
^ss y uopojag - t m l's itss -L en -t o, n """*)*L 8
5 ajsr/g % p v"0*uf'y ~: uors:3 rv f*'")*10,jy )!**^I*4
. < ycg nity u *paq uv ay o,y :aj sg u af': y I v : * *t"U
- tl"' '"['O
'u,sy,1 :a >gau p leu f ig laj o r,s %n u g oom,y -s f iu-sq uam yvg 9 e
.s sc/c zg s syng 7 - sy, y 7 s y y,1
- y y y - rf' * * *) ' "3 s
t c 4/ sj,,
t 911 a t 6 * *,v ws r 3 s
n
/,
t c
- sep,
~*y3 m u o p-ou -
an)- u - s e t - 3 >z -osa a s w ".1 t ~ : a aa m.~3 m:gs 3 v 9 z.
j O"133) u.trp a y afva 133('80S/3711.'
a/4j
'W u>ff 03NIWVX3 SIN 3WQ300 ffi.-(,q yvury,y u "*)/ of a(npoW/ ado 3s uo 20-8B og aaodag A B [** 666 og ga33og 3'ff f
- .F '_O__.aogaadsul _