ML20041C377

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Evaluation of SEP Topic III-8.A, Loose Parts Monitoring & Core Barrel Vibration Program. Requests Response as Soon as Possible
ML20041C377
Person / Time
Site: La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/1982
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Linder F
DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE
References
TASK-03-08.A, TASK-3-8.A, TASK-RR LSO5-82-02-097, LSO5-82-2-97, NUDOCS 8203010245
Download: ML20041C377 (4)


Text

)

gb

'itWTED S' ATdC-

~

T C

. (,/

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2

o e E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g

k..... j8 February 22, 1982 Docket No. 50-409 LS05 02-097 e

Recaeyro E

g R017982 6 Mr. Frank Linder

~__

General Manager Dairyland Power Cooperative

{ "ganum'h 2615 East Avenue South r *~m Lacrosse, Wisconsin 54601 4

g O

U

Dear Mr. Linder:

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC III-8.A. LOOSE PARTS MONITORING AND CORE BARRELL VIBRATION PROGRAM - LACROSSE i

Enclosed is a copy of our evaluation of Systematic Evaluation Program Topic III-8.A.

You are requested to examine the facts upon which the staff has based its evaluation and respond either by confirming that the facts are correct, or by identifying errors and supplying the corrected informa-i tion. We encourage you to supply any other material that might affect the staff's evaluation of this topic or be significant in the integrated assessment of your facility.

The need to actually implement a Loose Parts Monitoring Program will be determined during the integrated safety assessment.

Your response is requested as soon as possible. If no response is received by the time the next phast: of the integrated assessment of your.

facility begins, we will assume that you have no comments or corrections.

l Sincerely, l

oo NS@

Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief no Operating Reactors Branch #G Oy Division of Licensing -

g, [vM h

Enclosure:

/

no Request for Additional gy'64 g/M

.0 Information gjtA/(35) 8" Si l

gg cc w/ enclosure:

m a.n.

See next page

,OS l

vY jA h

~~

n OF FICE ) b1 h.h.kkh[.hb,... Ok.I, [b....

0L ORB.#5/PM DL-.. g/C D:

/SA

,,j

,,,,,,,,l d GL g,,has summ > 1B n.1..e.t.d..

. qC.g.i.i n a,,,,,,

WRu s s,e,1,1,,,,,

RDudl,ey,,,,, DCr hfie

,,, l 2/,M, a,,2,

.....2/f,y,zs,2,,,,,,,,2/ m a2,,,2!,g!,8,2,,,,

,2z.tgza2,,,,

, 2/.g',8,2 om>

nac ronu ais (io-ac) nacu o24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom mi-mwo

' Lacrosse 1

Docket No. 50-409 87 J.Rev. 2/8/82*

0 Mr. Frank Linder

~

cc Fritz Schubert, Esquire U. S. Environmental Protection Staff Attorney Agency Dairyland Power Cooperative Federal Activities Branch 2615 East Avenue South Region V Office La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601 ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative 230 South Dearborn Street O. S. Heistand, Jr., Esquire Chicago, Illinois 60604 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1800 M Street, N. W.

Mr. John-H. Buck Washington, D. C.

20036 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. R. E. Shimshak Washington, D. C.

20555 La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor Dairyland Power Cooperative Dr. Lawrence R. Quar.les P. O. Box 135 Kendal at Longwood, Apt. 51 Genoa, Wisconsin 54632 Kenneth Square, Pennsylvania 19348 Ms. Anne K. Morse Charles Bechhoefer, Esq., Chairman Coulee Region Energy Coalition Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P. O. Box 1583 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601 Washington, D. C.

20555

  • La Crosse Public Library Dr. George C. Anderson 800 Main Street Department of Oceanography La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601 University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office Mr. Ralph S. Decker Rural Route 41, Box 276 Route 4, Box 1900

. Genoa, Wisconsin 54632 Cambridge, Maryland 21613 Town Chairman Thomas S. Moore Town of Genoa Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Route 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Genoa, Wisconsin 54632 Washington, D.

C,.

20555 Chairman, Public Service Commission Mr. Georga R. Nygaard of Wisconsin Coulee Region Energy Coalitioa Hill Farms State Office Building 2307 East Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Lacrosse, Wisconsin 54601

,, s Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Huclear Regulatory Commission, Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection & Enforcement Washington, D. C.

20555 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. Frederick Milton Olsen, III 609 North lith Street Lacrosse, Wisconsin 54601

\\<

SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC III-8.A LACROSSE TOPIC:

III-8. A. LOOSE PARTS MONITORING AND CORE BARREL VIBRATION PROGRAM I.

INTRODUCTION

~ The purpose of this topic is to review the inservice surveillance program to detect loose parts and excessive motion of the main core support structure. The objective is to detect loose parts or excessive vibration before they can cause flow blockage or mechanical damage to the fuel or other safety related components.

II.

REVIEW CRITERIA Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 4.4, Regulatory Guide (R.G.)

1.133.

III.

RELATED SAFETY TOPICS AND INTERFACES V-1 Compliance with codes and standards (10 CFR 50.55a).

IV.

REVIEW GUIDELINES See Evaluation.

V.

Evaluation 1.

LOOSE PARTS MONITORING:

' R.G.1.133, " Loose-Part Detection Program for the Primary System of Light-Water-Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, describes features for monitoring loose parts within the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB). These features include sensors strategically located on the exterior surface of the,RCPB caoable of detecting acoustic disturbances, specifications for system sensitivity, alert levels, data acquistion modes and other system and procedural requirements. Lacrosse does not have a loo'se parts monitoring program that meets the criteria of this guide.

2.

CORE BARREL VIBRATION:

This issue is only a problem for Combustion Engineering built plants.

r

' ' VI. C0fiCLUSION 1.

A Loose Parts Mortitoring Program, (i.e., detection system and-procedures as specified in Section C.2 and C.3 of R.G. 1.133, Rev. 1) as currently required for.new facilities does not exist at the Lacrosse facility. The need to actually implement a Loose Parts Monitoring Program will be determined during the integrated assessment.

2.

The core barrel vibration issue has been deleted for Lacrosse.

9 0

m e%

e r

l

.-,r.-

__