ML20041C293
| ML20041C293 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/1982 |
| From: | Presler H CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBERG ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041C294 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8203010118 | |
| Download: ML20041C293 (1) | |
Text
-
mW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD32 FEB 25 A10:57 In the Matter of
)
- '7
DUKE POWER COMPANY, et al.
Docket Nos. 50-413 Catawba Nuclear Station,
..dil:30-414 Units 1 & 2
)
A Futher Proposal Regarding CMEC's Contentions I.
==
Introduction:==
After the conference call with Chairman Kelley on February 16, 1982, Petitioner (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Environmental Coalition) has had a number of discussions with George Johnson, Michael McGarry and Albert Carr.
We have come to a general agreement about CMEC's col.entions.
I set forth the substance of our agreement as follows.
CMEC should withdraw its filing of February 1,1982 a.
entitled 'A Proposed Change in CMEG's contentions.
b.
The NRC Staff undertakes to withdraw its objections to CMEC's original contention #1 in its filing of December 9, 1981 provided that a final paragraph be added to this contention.
This final paragraph should read as follows:
"Due to these inadequate projections, the cost / benefit balance does not support operation of the Catawba Nuclear Station."
Applicant continues to agree to its stipulation of c.
CMEC's contention #1 as reworded in (b.) above.
d.
Staff maintains-its objections to CMEC's contentions #2 & #4.
Staff is, however, prepared to withdraw its objections e.
to CMEC's contention #3 provided that it is reworded.
Mr. McGarry, Mr. Johnson and I are in agreement about this rewording.
Owing to NRC rules and procedures, it is necessary for Petitioner to file a separate document relating to this document.
Applicant will continue its stipulation to this reworded contention.
NRC Staff will atipulate to this reworded contention except insofar as it mentions: CMEC' a contention #2' to which Staff continues to object.
In sum then, we have developed two contentions, #1 and #3 to l
which both Staff and Applicant are prepared to stipulate and W
\\
n two contentions, #2 and #4 to which only Applicant is prepare 8
s to stipulate.
g[>
mz Qg@ II.
Accordingly, I request the Board to notice and admit thpq/
c 7 r"o 0
4 following changes in CMEC's: filings:
rao I
w,3 7982b i
oo 23 a.
CMEC withdraws its filing of February 1,1982.
$( (. g p m oji m
b.
CMEC adds e final paragraph to its first contention as LE #
06 in (I.b) above.
h c.
CMEC enters a separate filing, 'CMEC's Contention #3 revis which I include with this filing.
nOx 6
Q@o Enspectfi l:
s bmitted, f)$O Februay 2g 1982 M33@
A$_
60/
.