ML20041A927

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Problem of Comparison of Releases of short-lived Nuclide Such as Ra-226 Against EPA Std.Issue Is Whether Toxicity Index for Ra-226 Includes Effects of Daughters or Whether Daughters Are to Be Treated as Other Nuclides
ML20041A927
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/29/1982
From: Silling S
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Egan D
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
References
REF-WM-6 3406.3.1, NUDOCS 8202230014
Download: ML20041A927 (2)


Text

}b POR M 29 E Distribution:

M file

%uO 3406.3.1/SAS/82/01/25/0 WMHL rlf N54II,vM

-1_

WM r/f NMSS r/f 697.Sf JBMartin RE[ frowning WMHL:

3406.3.1 MJBell MRKnapp g

/ co SASilling Dr. Dan Egan EPA HJMilleq J0Buntj 1

401 M. Street PDR Wft iC3!VEg Crystal Mall #2 ANR 459

(

FE84o~yg, g i rag Washington, DC 20460 nr g

g

" p*;;;-c..m

.S

Dear Dr. Egan:

'A s

Thank you for giving me your thoughts on the treatment of short-lived (Isi nuclides during our phone conversation on January 22.

I am writing to clarify what I think the difficulty may be and to give an example.

Suppose a nu-lide with a long half-life has a daughter with a very short half-life.

As soon as a parent nucleus decays, the daughter nucleus decays almost immediately.

Therefore, in a given volume, the numbers of disintegrations per second are equal for the parent and daughter.

This means that the curie concentrations are equal for the parent and daughter.

The daughter species acts like a " shadow" which is found in curie concentrations equal to that of the parent.

1 Some long-lived nuclides which are of health concern in waste disposal have short-lived daughters.

In some cases there is a chain of short-lived daughters, each of which will be present in curie concentrations equal to that of the parent.

For example, Ra226 has a chain of eight short-lived daughters (Rn222, Po218, Pb214, Bi214, Po?14, l

Pb210, B1210, and Po210).

l The problem arises in comparing releases of a nuclide such as Ra226 against the EPA standard.

For every curie of Ra226 released, there is also eight curies of daughter products released.

Are these daughters in j

the "others" category in the EPA standard or should they be ignored?

The argument for ignoring them is that the toxicity index for Ra226 on which the release standard is based probably includes the effects of the l

daughters.

1 i

DIST:

TICKET NO:

OFC :

NAME :

DATE :82/01/25 l

8202230014 820129 l

PDR WASTE WM.-6 PDR

o 3406.3.1/SAS/82/01/25/0

.jfd; 23 IS32 However, in my view, a literal interpretation of the draft EPA standard in its current form would require each of the daughters to be compared against the 10 curie or 500 curie limit for "other" nuclides.

Thank you again for discussing the problem with me.

Please feel free to call me at 427-4173 if you have an further thoughts on the subject.

Sincerely, ORIGI"!1 CIG:C3TY Stewart A. Silling Project Manager High-Level Waste Licensing Management Branch Division of Waste Management DIST:

TICKET NO:

i WMHL* 'P!S :

WMHL*

WMHL*g4n:

0FC :

NAME $SASilling: Lmb MRKnapp

$ MJBell x__________.____________.____________.____________:___________

1/39/82 DATE :82/01/25 29 : 1/;(zf82

-...