ML20041A888
| ML20041A888 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1982 |
| From: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Delgeorge L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202220639 | |
| Download: ML20041A888 (3) | |
Text
i s
U DISTRIBUTYeN:
EDocket3 File bcc: TERA LB#2 File NSIC DEisenhut/RPurpl e NRC PDR FEB B IN RTedesco L PDR ASchwencer ACRS (16) fB na Docket Mos. 50-373 e
g 9
and 50-374
/N oodhead, OELD O '%.,,
e on III SJ",f S Res ident Inspector Mr. Louis 0. DelGeorge a
5
^ "
Director of Huclear Licensing 19 8 Commonwealth Edison Company b
"s%
jtso
'"r{pso" Post Office Box 767 2
RV9 r
s Chicago, Illinois 60690 x[ j.
f.,RHartfiel d, MPA Y
"6 **
Dear Mr. Delceorge:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM FOR SOLIDIFICATION AT LASALLE We reviewed the information contained in your Process Control Program (PCP) submitted on January 13, 1982, for the Radioactive Waste Solidift-cation System at LaSalle County Station. This system will utilize the cement solidification equipment provided by Stock Equipme:.t Company as described in your Topical Peport No. SRS-001-NP dated March 1979 This Topical Report is presently being reviewed. As a result of our review of your PCP, we find that we need additional infomation on this program including questions resulting from our review of the referenced Topical Report that are applicable only to the LaSalle Station.
We request that you provide the infomation not later than February 19, 1982.
If you require an Project Manager at (301)y clarification of this request, contact A. Bournia, 492-8196.
Sincerely, A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Info mation cc w/ enclosure: See next page
\\
D.(j,(,p,g,?,f,4.,
4.,,,,
,B C,
orricr >
sua - c> A.B.9.u.rg],a,;.k w.., AS c,h,)y, c e r.,
,, u, e,
B202220b39 B20208 PM AMM MMO A
D OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom ini-mu
Mr. Louis'0. De1 George l
Director of Nuclear Licensing l
Commonwealth Edison Company P. O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 cc:
Philip P. Steptoe, Esquire Suite 4200 One F.*
'Jht'orial Plaza Chic.:3o, illinois 60603 Dean Hansell, Esquire Assistant Attorney General 188 West Randolph Street Suite 2315 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Roger Walker, Resident Inspector LaSalle NPS, U.S.N.R.C.
P. O. Box 224 Marseilles, Illinois 61364 6
e 0
m
% M %?'?W<f9':%v~'w N:%?A R& 4% *.e.~&l9mv ; s'i.24 9: W*nf:;+w:h::~ %r&mt-v *&+',Pc.M+>q &
p 6
m
ENCLOSURE Request for Additional Information on the Process Control Program for the Radioactive Waste Solidification System (Rev 0) at LaSalle Station Section IV 1.
How will the wet filter cartridges be packaged for waste disposal?
~
2.
What controls will be used to prevent using the wrong solidifica-tion formula for the five different types of waste feed?
3.
a.
What chemical and physical characteristics will be measured by the analysis of the sampled feed?
b.
What steps will be taken to adjust the feed to the parameters for which the formulas were developed?
c.
How are these feed samples taken to assure they are representa-tive?
Section V 4.
a.
What limits are used to define free-standing ~ water versus no free-standing water?
b.
How is this determined through a 4-inch diameter drum plug hole?
5.
a.
Provide a summary of procedure LOS-WX-SRI.
b.
Define the laboratory scale tests for free-standing water and solidification and discuss the laboratory scale equipment.
c.
What will be done with drums that fail solidification or free-standing water inspection?
d.
Clarify that drum inspection is made after 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and prior wxp.vvare.v gq,w < by.to.,sh.ipment.wgry.gpp.qpo..w.wp.r.v,Apje.gq;owagg49 Section VI 6.
a.
How will storage conditions assure that the quality of the cement is maintained?
b.
Define the plant inspection for the cement.
General 7.
How will the Curie content in each drum be determined for shipment?
8.
Explain how the 4-inch ring (Part C9182) is atta'ched to the drum lid s.o that it does not rotate or fail during remote capping.
9.
a.
Describe the plant inspection steps for new drums.
b.
What steps will be taken to assure that open head drums are not used in the solidification system?
c.
What wall thickness is to be specified for new drums?
10.
Should a packaged drum be damaged in handling, what pre-shipment inspection controls and followup action will be taken?
11.
Laundry R0 wastes are.;ot referenced in the Topical Report.
Pro-vide the initial test results to verify that this type of waste can be solidified.
.