ML20040H590
| ML20040H590 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1982 |
| From: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Borgmann E CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202180417 | |
| Download: ML20040H590 (7) | |
Text
e
[
DISTRIBUTION:
Dock't Fil d RVanNiel e
LB#1 Rdg.
FPagano JYoungblood SSchwartz IPel tier BGrimes MRushbrook bec: TERA dei senhut PDR FEB 2 1932 RTedesco LPDR RVollmer NSIC Docket No.: 50-358 JKramer TIC SHanauer ACRS (16 RMattson S
c)
Mr. Earl A. Borgmann RHartfield, MPA e
Senior Vice President 0 ELD E
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company OIE S
RECEJYOU Post Office Box 960 TMcKenna 2
q Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 FEB 3. g2% c q-1 h :rm"" 8 ff$$}D
Dear Mr. Borgmann:
A N
We have completed our review of Zimer Nuclear Station Evacuation T me/A'nD\\
/
Estimates, dated August 1980, entitled " Appendix K, Preliminary Evacua'tio Time Study of the Plume Exposure Emergency Planning Zone around William H.
Zimer Nuclear Power Station Unit". The review included a field visit by Mr. Thomas Urbanik II of the Texas Transportation Institute. Mr. Urbanik found that the evacuation time estimates appear to be reasonable for. a rural site based on a check of potential evacuation routes and reported population distributions. liowever, the study did not provide sufficient information to support the evacuation time estimates. Therefore, we sug-gest that you submit a revised Evacuation Time Estimate addressing the concerns identified in Enclosure 1.
It is requested that any questions regarding this letter be directed to Mr. Richard Van Niel, Section Chief. Emergency Preparedness Licensing Branch,(301)294-4534.
Sincerely, i
Orirfinal r,irn6d by:
D. J. You:gblood B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No.1 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl.: See next page 8202180417 820202 PDR ADOCK 05000358 F
PDR D:DEP:IE I)/ V BGrimes*
r
-SEEPREVIOUSORCFORlCyNCURRENCES*
DL:LB#1 DL:fB#1 DL:AD........ /..L EPLB:DEP:IE EPLB:DEP:IE EPLB:DEP:IE DD:DEP:IE omc, >
l
=== r >.U'.e.1
,9* B,J,Yp,ungblppd %LTede,s cp,*,,,
,T,Mc, Ken n,a *
,R,Va,n,N i,e,1 *
,Q,agano*
SSchwa rtz,*
2/1/.82 2/1/82 L
o.
, t.nc ronu sie tio-son nacu c24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY uso e u - m eeo
~
Mr. Earl A. Borgmann Senior Vice President Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Post Office Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 cc: Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
Deborah Faber Webb Conner, Moore & Corber 7967 Alexandria Pike 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Alexandria, Kentucky 41001 Washington, D. C.
20006 Andrew B. Dennison, Esq.
Mr. William J. Moran 200 Main Street General Counsel Batavia, Ohio 45103 Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Post Office Box 960 George E. Pattison, Esq.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney 462 Main Street Mr. Samuel H. Porter Batavia, Ohio 45103 Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur 37 West Broad Street ResidentInspecter/Zimmer'$
Columbus, Ohio 43215 RFD 1, Post Office Box'202i U. S.. Route 52 Mr.3amesD.Flynn, Manager M scow, Ohio 45153 Licensing Environmental Affairs Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Mr. John Youkilis Post Office Box 960 Office of the Honorable William Gradison Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C.
20515 David Martin, Esq.
Office of the Attorney General Timothy S. Hogan, Jr., Chairman 209 St. Clair Street Board of Commissioners First Floor 50 Market Street, Clerment County Frankfort, Kentucky 10601 Batavia, Ohio. 45103 James H. Feldman, Jr., Esq.
Lawrence R. Fisse, Esq.
216 East 9th Street Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Cincinnati, Ohio 45220 462 Main Street Batavia, Ohio 45103 W. Peter Heile, Esq.
Assistant City Solicitor James G. Keepler Room 214, City Hall U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Cincinnati, Ohio 45220 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 John D. Woliver, Esq.
Legal Aid Security Post Office Box #47 550 Kilgore Street Batavia, Ohio 45103
9 ENCLOSURE ESTIMATED OF EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES ZIftMER NUCLEAR STATION 1.
Submit a map of principal evacuation roadways as shown in NUREG-0654.
Using the map as a reference, accurate descriptions of the roadway seg-ments should be provided.
In developing the roadway network, it may be necessary to include portions of the roadwcy beyond the EPZ.
For example, Persimmon Cove Rd. (CR1121) is considered a principal evacuation route.
Its effectiveness is limited by its connection with SR-10.
It is not clear from the report if the section of SR-10 from CRll21 to US 27 prop-erly accounts for the merging of these two routes.
It should be noted that several alternate routings do exist (e.g., SR-824 to SR-9).
A similar problem exists in the area of Felicity where three routes leave town. However, depending on the number of residents in Felicity (which is not presently delineated in the study), the intown segment of SR-756/
SR-222 may be a bottleneck. Again, it is not clear from the analysis if this potential problem has been properly addressed.
2.
The assumptions concerning automobile occupancy should be made more con-servative.
1.3 autos per household is suggested.
3.
Determine the volume of traffic on each roadway segment to isolate any bottlenecks.
4 Use 1980 census data in performing the analysis and provide the population data in a rose format as indicated in NUREG-0654.
5.
Discuss refueling or other activities that might increase the plant's population and their impact on the evacuation times.
6.
Problems of flooding or sliding have apparently been reported at isolated locations. These flood / sliding prone areas should be identified on a map so that alternative routings, if any, can be evaluated. Given the infrequent nature of such occurrences, they would not be the basis of the adverse weather scenario. However, their possible impact is an appropriate plan-ning consideration.
7.
The evacuation time estimates should be reviewed by appropriate State and local officials. The need for special traffic control measures should also be discussed, u
- 8. -Provision for transportation of persons without automobiles should be discussed. What are their numbers and locations? What resources are available, how long does it take for mobilization, and will more than one trip be necessary? The results of the analysis should be an estimate of the time required for this special population subgroup.
9.
Specify the positive means for traffic control at all. identified bottle-necks.
- 10. Submit a copy of the Clermont Disaster Services Agency Study along with a discussion of how the times in this study compare with those in the CGE study.
- 11. Address the impact of adverse weather on evacuation.
- 12. Discuss the impact of the Clermont County plans not to evacuate into Brown County on the evacuation times.
i
r P
)
~
e
...-..-. g --.,
.s~so
/
osee ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SUP y f,.s.l.m..
. TO: (Nemo, oAlce symbol, room number,.
Initials Date ouil6ag, Agency /Peet) 3,.-I-Je444m:._
c e-n',,,,
f h
M fe "u!^^d 7
~.. u....u uf -,
G.
L. r-oo 316 i hillir s-4;. i. naenna 5.T.'Yuu uscl i
Action -
File Note and "totsam Amt For Cleerence Per Conversation As Requested For Correction Propero Res%
?'
Circulate For Your Information See Me Comment hastigste Signature CWination Justify
+
REMARKS Ltr to Zimer -
Subj: Evaucation Time Estimates i
DO NOT use this form as e RECORD of approvals. concurreste disposais, s
clearances, and similar actions FR004:(Nemo, org. symbol, Agericy/ Post)
Room No.-Bids.
7
~ I. Pel tier, LDi11, DL
% no,
,27038
.k scel-102.
OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
-
- CM 1980 0 - 311-156 (6)
Preacntee by oSA FPMR (41 CF1t) 101-11.20s I
s e
m
- m.,
i.
g g
g g
DISTRIBUTI0ft:
Docket File CRVanfliel LB #1 Rdg.
FPagano JYoungblood SSchwartz IPeltier BGrimes Do:ket flo.: 50-358 MRushbrook bcc: TERA DEisenhut PDR RLTedesco LPDR RVollmer flSIC Mr. Earl A. Borgaann Senior Vice President JKramer TIC SHanauer ACRS (6)
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Post Office Box 960 RMattson Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 RHartfield, MPA OIE OELD
Dear Dr. Borgmann:
TMcKenna We have completed our review of Zirrner fiuclear Station Evacuation Time Estimates, dated August 1980, entitled " Appendix K, Preliminary Evacuation Time Study of the Plume Exposure Emergency Planning Zone around William H.
Zingner fluclear Power Station Unit." The review included a field visit by Mr. Thomas Urbanik II of the Texas Transportation Institute. Mr. Urbanik found that the evacuation time estimates appear to be reasonable for a rural site based on a check of potential evacuation routesand reported population distributions. However, the study did not provide sufficient information to support the evacuation time estimates. Therefore, we sug-gest that you submit a revised Evacuation Time Estimate addressing the concerns identified in Enclosure 1.
It is requested that any questions regarding this letter be directed to lir. Richard Van Iliel, Section Chief, Emergency Preparedness Licensing Branch,(301)294-4534.
Sincerely, Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing Divisior, of Licensing
Enclosure:
As statti cc w/ encl.: See next page
~
f C.
id&
p
^ LO
' D.
- See previous ORC for concurrences pisBGrMs*
ml, 0}'
82 m
//
omer >.DL:
}.
..DL:.LIh
.DL:AD/L.
.. EP.:QE2:.IE.....ER :DEP.:.IE.rg
.bE....
.;1E.
cowwr).JP Klg/kM..BJ Ecungb loodA.RLTode-se, b ' En na....
R nfj.ie.l..
<...EG a, o...
....SASchwar.tz
"' I.0.1/
.82..
.Ql/18/6.2
... 01/,,,182
,01]Q/82....
01/Q/,82,,,,,;,,fM2,,,,,,,01@,82 unc,om m d n uacu cuo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
"" * ~ 2 " 2 '
o
+
DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File BGrimes LB#1 Rdg.
bec: TERA JYoungblood PDR IPeltier LPDR MRushbrook NSIC DEisenhut TIC Docket No.:
50-358 RLTedesco ACRS (16)
RVollmer JKramer Mr. Earl A. Borgmann SHanauer Senior Vice President RMattson Cincinnati Gas & Electric Conpany RHartfield, MPA
-Post Office Box 960 0IE Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 OELD TMcKenna
Dear Mr. Borgmann:
CRVan Niel FPagano SSchwartz We have completed our review of Jimer Nuclear Station Evacuation Time Estimates, dated Aucust 1980, enjitled " Appendix K. Preliminary Evacuation Time Study of the Plume Exposure mergency Planning Zone around William H.
Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Unit " The review included a field visit by Mr. Thomas Urbanik II of the Texas Transportation Institute. Mr. Urbanik found that the evacuation time est ates appear to be reasonable for a rural site based on a check of pote tial evacuation route and reported population distributions. However, the study did not provide sufficient information to support the evacuatio time estimates. Therefore, we sug-gest that you submit a revised Evacuagon Time Estimate addressing the concerns identified in Enclosure 1.
- pcet th:t thu.:tt:m M resolved:dur_ing:the:hearina_orec+ m.
It is requested that any questions rega ding this letter be directed to Mr. Richard Van Niel, Section Chief, E. rgency Planning Licensing Branch, (301)294-4534.
Sin erely, 1
Rober L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for icensing Divisi n of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl.: See next page OELD D/ EP/I&E
- SEE PREVIOUS WHITE FOR CONCURRENCE.
BGrimes*
1/
/R9 DL:LB#1 DL:
DL:AD/L EPLB/I&E jEPLB/I&E EPLB/I&E DD/DEP/I&E omcet suan=c >. IRelti 8
.o.o.d
.RLT.e. des.co.......TMcKenna....
CRVan..Niel..
ESPagano....
SSchwar.tz.....
.1L1.W.8.......... 1L.1.8...... 1L... LE.........1L..l.M..
.. 1L..LN...
.U....La2...
.1L...L62......
amy NRC FORM M 40% NRCM 0ao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usceo. mi-m.=
m
~
?7 ey
,, ~;
y-y
~f C'
W U
Q (j
2 Av y
Distribution Docket File bcc:
LB#1 Rdg TERA DEisenhut NRC/PDR BJYoungblood L/PDR Docket No.
50-358 RLTedesco NSIC MRushbrook TIC N
IPeltier ACRS (16)
\\
RVollmer
\\
RMattson RHartfield, MPA Mr. Earl A. Borgmann 0 ELD s
Senior Vice President
\\
OIE (1)
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company SHanauer Post Office Box 960 JKramer Cincinnati, Ohio 45201
Dear Mr. Borgmann:
We have completed our review of Zimmer Nuclear Station Evacuation Time Estimates, dated August 1980, entitlhd " Appendix K. Preliminary Evacuation Time Study of the Plume Exposure Emer'gency Planning Zone around William H.
Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Unit." The review included a field visit by Mr. Thomas Urbanik II of the Texas Transportation Institute. Mr. Urbanik found that the evacuation time estimates'\\ appear to be reasonable for a rural site based on a check of potential evacuation route and reported population distributions. However, the study did not provide sufficient information to support the evacuation time \\estima tes. Therefore, we sug-gest that you submit a revised Evacuation Time Estimate addressing the con-cerns identified in Enclosure 1,*itMn t=dt" - '
d--Nb: ef " dete--~~ k Ay
.of thir_letterr-,
M kQ L4,24 It requested that any questions regarding thid letter bei directed to Mr. Richard Van Niel, Section Chief. Emergency Planning Licensing Branch, (301) 294-4534.
Sincerely, RobertL.Tede\\
sco, Assistant Director forLicensing\\
Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As Stated cc: See next page
/
D See previous concurrence ri s
v'
\\
9t:.L.B.#.1..... D L.:,L B # 1,,,,,,,,.DL,:AD]L,,,
EPLB,/I&E,,
, EP,LB/I,&E,,,,, E PL,B /,I & E,,,,,
DD/DEP/,I&E
"""4
.I.Pg,1,t i e,dy,t. 8),Y,o,u ngb,1, ppd,,R,(,Te# R s,q p..,
,,TMc Kenna,,
, C,RVa,9,,N,i el,,,$Pa,ga ng,,,,,
,,S Sc,h,wa,r,tz.,,
om) i sac rosu me ne so.wucu o24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
- " " *-32n2D