ML20040F637
| ML20040F637 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1982 |
| From: | Sells D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202090446 | |
| Download: ML20040F637 (6) | |
Text
--.
l I
yne mq
, vg 4i D44 Ng g
4-g y
m JAN 261982
~
b Rg0
\\
Docket Nos.: 50-498/499 8/p 4
8 r11
.f APPLICANT: Houston Lighting and Power Compas y i
9
!?
FACILITY:
South Texas Project A
4)
/
SUBJECT:
MEETING SUPNARY "
On Monday, January 18, 1982 meetings were held with Houston Lighting and PowerCompany(HL&P). The morning meeting was held at the offices of i
Brown and Root (B&R). The afternoon meeting was held in the offices of i
Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC).
J. Blau spent a few minutes discussing the status of the B&R effort concerning the transmittal of infonnation to BPC. B&R is not developing the work packages, that have'been identified in previous meetings, as originally planned. Insteadi B&R is pulling together units of information, i.e., material relating to a ' single purchase order, material related to pipe supports in the containment building, etc. These are then transmitted and BPC assaables them into appropriate work packages. The total number of units to be transmitted is' about 1400. As of Monday, January 18, 453 -
have been transmitted. Of these, some 100 plus, were transmitted on the previous Friday. The bulk of the transfer of information will be accomplished over the next two months. Final transfer is scheduled for April 30, 1982. Several bulk transmittals have occurred.
In particular the
~
drawings have been transferred to BPC in a bulk transfer rather than on a piece meal basis. Schedules for the delivery of units of information to BPC were provided in the fann of 35 large sheets. I had an opportunity to look at several of the units that were ready to be sent to BPC. Each package contained a transmittal letter, check lists that indicate the documents included in the package, documents previously supplied (i.e.,
drawings) and documents which'still need to be supplied if such is the case, and finally the included documents.
Following the discussion of the B&R transfer schedule. I met with !!r.
White (HL&P) and Mr. Hurley (BPC) to briefly review the status 'of the BPC Quadrex Report review. This review is being conducted by an independent BPC task force operating principally out of San Francisco. This task force is to provide a report 'that will address each item contained in the Quadrex Report and dispos'ition each item in one of a number of ways.
Although not clear what these categories will be, certainly it can be expected that one category will include items that can be eliminated from further consideration an'd another would be one that recommends more detailed analysis during the transition analysis. It now appears that most of the items will require final dispositioning by the project 1
office conducting the transition ' analysis. Originally, it was planned 20 pro nce an interlm report i1stlng those items that can be eliminated
- "'cc >
. {. ~
~..- -
- "~~~
8202090446 820126 5-ou,g PDR ADOCK 05000498 A
" " ~
- - ~ ~
~
nac rosu ais nomomacu ono OFFICIAL RECOFiD COPY
' " *,80-32n24
e r-Sys w e;q sy w v gg g
8 n w-4 g
y_
y y
, j g 2 6 1982
-from further consideration with appropriate justification. It now appears that there will be only one report from the BPC task force and that it will be midMarch before that report will become available. I was assured that HL&P will not see the report prior to receipt and that upon receipt, copies will be immediately transmitted to the f1RC as received.
In the afternoon meeting with BPC the records maintained that reflect receipt of information from B&R were reviewed.
The BPC review schedules were discussed and provided.
These schedules identify work packages. I was told that there are approximately 160 work packages. The BPC professional engineering staff now stands at about 150 and review of information is initiated as soon as the material is received and has been properly logged and associated with the appropriate work package. Three work packages were reviewed, one a compliance package that covers aspects of a number of the more discipline specific packages.
fio work package is complete either in terms of all material being available or; obviously, analysis.
I indicated that where Region IV desired Headquarters assistance ir, monitoring the transition activities, f1RR was prepared to provide such assistance and that such requests are expected.
I also indicated that f4RR personnel may want to review a complete work package and that I felt such a review should be conducted in Houston and that the package would probably be identified in advance of the review. When asked, I stated that I would recommend to my management that the assigned reviewers from f1RR have design engineering experience to the maximum extent possible.
Both HL&P and BPC expressed concern that review at this level of detail could cause problems unless the reviewer is familiar with design engineering practices.
In addition a meeting was held in the evening with C. Robertson (HL&P),
J. Hurley (BPC) and J. Ghromley (BPC) to discuss transition activities in general.
This meeting was designed to more fully explore and understand the HL&P/BPC interface and the future relationship between the two as well as the impact of this transition on the licensing process.
onald e tr;' Project Manager Licensing Branch tio. 3 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page.
DL:LB#3
..'..DL : L B,[# 3
,,nc,p 3
5"^"5>. D.E.
j,:,J.b FJ ia DATEf
....]..j
- 8. 2...
}
.82.......
" " " " " " " ~ -
nnc rowu aia no eoinncu ouo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
' e e -a29 24
r-
...i',-
5 MEETfNG'
SUMMARY
DISTRIBUTIDN Docket File 50-498/499 W. Johnston NRC PDR S. Pawlicki Local PDR V. Benaroya NSIC Z. Rosztoczy TERA W.'Haass LB#3 Files D. Muller H. Denton R. Ballard E. Case W. Regan D. Eisenhut A. Toalston R. Purple R. Mattson R. Tedesco T. Speis.
B. J. Youngblood M. Srinivasan.
.A. Schwencer
- 0. Parr F. Miraglia F. Rosa E. Adensam B. Sheron, Acting J. Miller-L. G. Hulman
.G. Lainas R. Houston T. -Wambach,' Acting W. Gammill B. Russell
-F. Congel D. Crutchfield L. Rubenstein T. Novak W. Butler S. Varga C. Berlinger
-T.
Ippolitto R. Clark F. Schroeder J..Stolz
'K. Kniel R. Vollmer D. Skovholt J. Knight G. Knighton R. Bosnak M. Ernst F. Schauer A..Thadani R. Jackson W. Minners
~
G. Lear S. Hanauer Project Manager D. E. Sells H. Th,mpson Attorney, OELD D. Vassallo J. Lee P.. Collins.
0IE (3)
D. Ziemann ACRS (16)
V. Moore NRC Participants bcc: Applicant & Service List
e
)
pitcg o
UNITED STATES g
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
j WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 t
\\
/
JAN 2 61982 Docket Nos.: 50-498/439 APPLICANT: Houston Lighting and Power Company FACILITY:
South Texas Project
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
On Monday, January 18, 1982 meetings were held with Houston Lighting and Power Company (HL&P). The morning meeting was held at the offices of Brown and Root (B&R). The afternoon meeting was held in the offices of Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC).
J. Blau spent a few minutes discussing the status of the B&R effort concerning the transmittal of information to BPC. B&R is not developing the work packages, that have been identified in previous meetings, as originally planned.
Instead, B&P, is pulling together units of information, i.e., material relating to a single purchase order, material related to pipe supports in the containment building, etc. These are then transmitted and BPC assembles then into appropriate work packages. The total number of units to be transmitted is about 1400. As of Monday, January 18, 453 have been transmitted. Of these, some 100 plus, were transmitted on the previous Friday. The bulk of the transfer of information will be accomplished over the next two months.
Final transfer is scheduled for April 30, 1982. Several bulk transmittals have occurred.
In particular the drawings have been transferred to BPC in a bulk transfer rather than on a piece meal basis. Schedules for the delivery of units of information to BPC were provided in the form of 35 large sheets.
I had an opportunity to look at several of the units that were ready to be sent to BPC. Each package contained a transmittal letter, check lists that indicate the documents included in the package, documents previously supplied (i.e.,
drawings) and documents which still need to be supplied if such is the case, and finally the included documents.
Following the discussion of the B&R transfer schedule, I met with Mr.
White (HL&P) and Mr. Hurley (BPC) to briefly review the status of the BPC Quadrex Report review. This review is being conducted by an independent BPC task force operating principally out of San Francisco. This task force is to provide a report that will address each item contained in the Quadrex Report and disposition each item in one of a number of ways.
Although not clear what these categories will be, certainly it can be expected that one category will include items that can be eliminated from further consideration and another would be one that recommends more detailed analysis during the transition analysis. It now appears that most of the items will require final dispositioning by the project office conducting the transition analysis.
Originally, it was planned to provide an interim report listing those items that can be eliminated
2-JAN 2 61982 from further consideration with appropriate justification. It now appears that there will be only one report from the BPC task force and that it will be midMarch before that report will become available. I was assured that HL&P will not see the report prior to receipt and that upon receipt,'
copies will be immediately transmitted to the NRC as received.
In the afternoon meeting with BPC the records maintained that reflect receipt of-information from B&R were reviewed. The BPC review schedules were discussed and provided. These schedules identify work packages. I was told that there are approximately 160 work packages. The BPC professional engineering staff now stands at about 150 and review of information is initiated as soon as the material is received and has been properly logged and associated with the appropriate work package. Three work packages were reviewed, one a compliance package _that covers aspects of a number of the more discipline specific packages. No work package is complete either in terms of all material being available or; obviously, analysis.
I indicated that where Region IV desired Headquarters assistance in monitoring the transition activities, NRR was prepared to provide such assistance and that such requests are expected.
I also indicated that NRR personnel may want to review a complete work package and that I felt such a review should be conducted in Houston and that the package would probably be identified in advance of the review. When asked, I stated that I would recommend to my management that the assigned reviewers from NRR have design engineering experience to the maximum extent possible.
Both HL&P and BPC expressed concern that review at this level of detail could cause problems unless the reviewer is familiar with design engineering practices.
In addition a meeting was held in the evening with C. Robertson (HL&P),
J. Hurley (BPC) and J. Ghromley (BPC) to discuss transition activities in general. This meeting was designed to more fully explore and understand the HL&P/BPC interface and the future relationship between the two as well as the impact of this transition on the licensing process.
/.
7 Project Manager onald e
Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page.
SOUTH TEXAS if r. G. W. ' '
.y auchorn Executive..
it Director
...ar Company C;
llouston Lij...
3 2
r; for Equitable Utilities, Ir.c.
P. O. Box 1/w
...e 1, Box 1684 liouston, Texc...
l'
'l C
neia, Texas 77422 lir. J. H. 'loli g
alli 7 S. Jordan, III Esq.
l Vice President
...'. nr Engineering I'.r. a B '.!a i s s 1
& Construct 1725 I Street, N.W.
Houston Lighti : - ! N ar Company Suite 506 P. O. 30x 1/-
'?vli f e, D.C.
20006
'.u,;.:n, Tc l
B ri.'n ~. :raick, Esq.
- 1r. D. G. ::
'tcriger, 502
,ect Avistint Attorney General Houston Ligh.
2r Company Environantal Protection Division P. O. 0 0x l/
P. O. Ea< IP548 r
'l stion
'u
. >a, T A.. ; i a, ;.;.u s /3711 Mr. H. L. Bor...
Central Power 1
- w. Cv :pany Shnnon H. Phillips P. O. Box 2121 Resident Inspector / South Texas Project C r,ms Chris'1 : m
' ' M3 c/o U. S. 'NC P. O. 5a 910
,c.R.L.Um Bay City, Tc as
//414 C i ty o f Aus :. ' '
Electric Uti'
..it P. O. Cox 1.
- s;.in, Te4 ;
'r. J. B. F.
Mr. La: ny Sinkin Awistant C:-
. ;r for Operations Pat Coy C i ty P t.bl i c ~ ~
r1 Ci ti> ens Concerned About Nuclear Power P. O. ~ :( 1/
5:'5 C.se Oro ii ),
Texas /3/33
- i o,
c i
Jack R.
.< r..1;.in Rubertson tr.costein,*
- I rad & f oll lWe jer, ';uclear Licensing 1b25 Cc
.-c u r,
N.W.
H as un Li;hting and Power Company P. O. ':,x 1700 scir,g.:n, '
.n, r c.s 770J1
- l'.r c Scn,
1 Baker & Botts One Shell Pla :-3 Houston, Teus
/ RJ2
- 'r. E. i. c il '
'li Brown ?. Lot, : c.
P. O. Box 3 Hauston, Texas
~'291
)
List of participants (Not all inclusive)
Morning Mike Powell HL&P Rick Jocobi HL&P i
Johnny Blau HL&P l
Jon White HL&P l
S. M. Dew HL&P Pete Jordon B&R Billy Mitchell B&R John Wawrzeniak B&R Jim Hurley BPC Afternoon Rick Jacobi HL&P Rudy Molleda HL&P Chuck Halligan BPC Jim Hurley BPC Larry Damon BPC Jim Ghromley BPC 1
1
_ __ ____.