ML20040D332
| ML20040D332 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 01/25/1982 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.E.4.1, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8202010188 | |
| Download: ML20040D332 (2) | |
Text
..
i
.- o e
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANOOGA. TENT ESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut Street, Tower II a
q P
pgCO N jgn29 W.8 January 25, 1982 2
c_
wag 3Fg" ? 3 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Ng Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation k,
g U
d i
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Denton:
l In the Matter of the
)
Docket Nos. 50-259 Tennessee Valley Authority
)
50-260 l
50-296 T. A. Ippolito's letter to H. G. Parris dated December 22, 1981 1
requested confirmation that deviations from the stated positions of NUREG-0737 Items II.E.4.1.2, II.F.1.1, and II.F.1.2 are solely scheduling and not technical.
4 At present, it is our intent that our request for deviations be a request for deferral of the schedule as outlined in our October 28, 1981 and November 3, 1981 letters to you. However, we believe that the following clarifications may be in order.
Items II.F.1.1 and II.F.1.2 - Effluent Monitors We will provide continuous monitoring of high-level postaccident releases of noble gases and collection of radioiodines and particulates on sampling media with onsite laboratory analysis for all anticipated postaccident gaseous effluent pathways.
However, it should be noted that at the time of implementation, technical deviations may be requested to facilitate compromises between different criteria. One possible compromise could be that location of the sample collection equipment to reduce the radiation exposure of employees during sample removal, transport, and anaysis may require sample line lengths that would not meet the criteria for representative or isokineti6 sampling.
J b
ft[h I 8202010188 820125 PDR ADOCK 05000259 l
P-PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer
- -.. -. -. ~, -, - - _ -, -.., - -,.
.-a o Mr. Harold R. Denton January 25, 1982 Item II.E.4.1.2 - Dedicated Hy,drogen Penetrations Your understanding of our position on this ites (as stated in T. A. Ippolito's December 22, 1981 letter) is correct. The only modifications necessary to bring us into full compliance are those previously described on the vent side of the system. Our schedule for these modifications is outlined in my October 28, 1981 letter to you.
We will continue to inform you of any future changes in our proposed schedule. Any request for deviations and clarifications will be made as needed on a case-by-case basis. Your continuing cooperation is greatly I
appreciated.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLE! AUTHORITY L. M. Mills, Ma ager Nuclear Regulation and Safety day of[Ao before
-Subscrib n
sworn
- 1W,ud4t/1982.
me this Odd.
I fotary Public
~
My Commission Expires
,