ML20040B974

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Attention Required Re Licensee Criticism of STS Review Approach.Sts Are Being Changed Often & Some Facility STS Differ for Different Units
ML20040B974
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/14/1981
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hanauer S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20040B972 List:
References
NUDOCS 8201270120
Download: ML20040B974 (1)


Text

[

~~

T(ho nroy'o,,

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

g

,1 wAssiwoTou, o. c. 20sss 5

( *.* *

  • f

/

December 14, 1981 7 /)

MEMORANDUM FOR:

S. Hanauer, Director Division of Safety Technology FROM:

Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing

SUBJECT:

CHANGING STANDARD TECHNICAL SP.ECIFICATIONS..

Recently, a number of new licensees and projected upcoming licensees have been critical of the NRC's Standard Technical Specification (STS) review approach. More specifically, they are arguing that we do not have a set of STS that are constant but rather that they are changing often, even weekly. You will also recall that the Sequoyah 1 and Sequoyah 2 STS are different in a large number of areas.

Perhaps the utilities are being unduly critical of the NM in this area but if even a part of their arguments are valid, it would demonstrate an uncontrolled series of new requirements. My concern was recently heightened by my discussion with both PMs and members of the DST STS group who inferred that this is a problem that is out of control.

I want to emphasize that I do not know whether this is or is no't a problem.

It has reached a level of concern, however, where I believe it warrants prompt attention.

I will be happy to apsist you in this effort.

1

,-(@llb.Eisenhu(./(,It.,U. V

~

-/14 P!

Darre t, Director Division of Licensing cc:

H. Denton R. Tedesco V. Stello h

8201270120 820107 PDR HEVGP NRCCRGR PDR

_