ML20040A788

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Addl Response to FOIA Request for 15 Categories of Documents Re UCLA License Renewal.Documents Listed in App a Completely Withheld:Commerical,Financial or Unclassified Safeguards Info (Ref FOIA Exemptions 4 & 5)
ML20040A788
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/01/1981
From: Felton J
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Aftergood S
COMMITTEE TO BRIDGE THE GAP
References
FOIA-0CK81-339 NUDOCS 8201220117
Download: ML20040A788 (3)


Text

SQk-Dila j

f %.

l f

g UNITED STATES y y

.,f g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

. i _

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%f...,..}j l

December 1, 1981 l

Mr. Steven Aftergood l

Committee to Bridge the Gap l

1637 Butler Avenue #203 IN RESPONSE REFER Los Angeles, CA 90025 TO F01A-81-339

Dear Mr. Aftergood:

This is in further response to Mark Pollock's undated letter received in this office on August 21, 1981, in which he requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act,15 categories of information regarding the t

i UCLA license renewal.

Document 1, listed on Appendix A, contains information which identifies procedures for safeguarding licensed special nuclear material at a licensed facility or plant.

This information is considered commercial or financial (proprietary) information pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d) and is being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Exemption (4) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4) of the Commission's regulations.

Document 2 contains unclassified safeguards information.

The statutory authority for withholding this information is found in Section 147 of - e i p,5 the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2167).

This information is being

'N~

k withheld from public disclosure pursuant to exemption (3) of the Fy(4. dom pr ?

of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(3) of the h,"-

U } ,

s L

Comission's regulations.

is L

DE03 198D-These documents are being withheld in their entirety.

! $, u. u a m m e E,

samm Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has bee'n Q determined that the information withheld is exempt from production ot br 4N' J disclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the 4 N. '

public interest.

The persons responsible for these denials are the undersigned and Mr. John G. Davis, Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

These denials may be appealed to the Commission's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of ~this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, l

Washington, D.C. 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision."

i 8201220117 811201 PDR FOIA l

POLLOCK81-339 PDR This completes NRC's action on your request.

Sincerely,

/

/~

,a>w

/

(f'M.Felton, Director V

Division of Rules and Records

/

Office of Administration

/

~.

Re:

F01A-81-339 APPENDIX A 1.

Physical Security Plan for the University of Florida, August 4, 1980.

2.

Physical Security Plan for the University of Washington.

e

fn,n foW(ib thek 2sf.

h re: (104f) /tNs,c f&whf FREE OF NF MA_ TION 1

SD-/YL-pg A-et -33 9 G ac 'd 2.:q - p/

1 i

Et37 'O "?C STICF TC ??CTUTIC" Intervenor hereby requests the follcuing docunents be produced.

~hese docunents can be produced by having copies sent to Intervenori l.

or the" can be ade available for inspection and copyin5 at the IICE.

l

~;.ese requests are =de pursuant to the Freedom of Infernation Act as well as the discovery procedures established in this proceedin6 Irtervencr recuests waivirr of any cop;;inc and search fees, as per the Freedon of Infornation Act, as the use to which the docunents will be g

put is provision of infernation to the Atonic 3a'et?, a*d Licensing 3oard in a ratter of reaci.or sa'ety. Provisien of a full, evidentiary record for the Ioard is obviously in the public interest.

urthernere, Intervenor notes that :TC Sta'f has not charged the T

other party ir this proceeding for docunents provided.

We follouing docunents are hereby recuested for production I

all licensco event reports for the University of Unshington and the '.:iversity of Florida Argonaut reactors for the period 1970 to the present, all abnornal occurrence reports fron of F and U cf W ATEonaut reacters 1970 to present not ircluded in iten above.

a nual reports for the last,three years fron both reactors initial hasard analysis fron '*niversity of 'a'ashington drawines provided "2C Staff by " CIA in response to TRC Question dl,

)

4-17-80, reactor core drawings provided by GC Staff to 0.2. Cort for his study.

AEC letter, Price to ~celter, regarding Argon 41, Septenber 9.1960

p. 2. inspection repcrt 1963 application for relicensing, University of Washington and Universit-; of Florida inspection reports,1975 to present, University of '.ashington and "niversity of Florida reactors protnbilistic risk assessnents for research reactors perforned by "EC compilations of statistical data regarding operating performance (# of unintentional scrans, abnornal occurrences, violations) conparirs research reacter perfornance, currert statenent of "RC policy reEarding consideration of Class 9 accidents in 3 2s. EIAs. and licensing hearings.

2es. Guide 1.60 docunents detailing results of or status of review of total sa#eguards requirenentsatresearchreactorsnentionedinlg"30528,C1I-EO-37.

1

/

y p