ML20040A446

Forwards Summary of Review of Info Re SEP Topic III-6, Seismic Design Considerations & Licensee Seismic Program Plan & Request for Addl Info.Response Requested within 45 Days

ML20040A446
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	01/19/1982
From:	Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Hoffman D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
TASK-03-06, TASK-3-6, TASK-RR LSO5-82-01-045, LSO5-82-1-45, NUDOCS 8201210109
Download: ML20040A446 (5)

Text

r~

i L.

i l

i January 19, 1982 G

h Do:.ket No. 50-155 gDMO (?

LS05-32-01-045 Oil 20 Qy Esnu bg o;

ew 6

Hr. David P. Hoffman q

Huclear Licensing Administrator c,

Consuicers Power Conpany 4

1945 W Parnall Road Jackson, flichigan 49201

SUBJECT:

BIG ROCK POINT - SEP TOPIC III-6, " SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS" REVIEW OF LICENSEE'S SEISMIC PROGRK4 PLN1 AHD REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INF0MATION The attached enclosure is a sunaary of the revica of the infontiation (see references at the end of the enclosure) you provided regarding your program for seismic reevaluation of your plant facility.

It is presented in the fon: of a checklist indicating the adequacy of criteria and methodology.

Unresolved questions are expressed in terms of connents in the sursary.

It should be noted that even if the nethodologies are deened adequate Trou a review of program plan, the application of the proposed nothods cust be reviewed in detail when the analysis results are available.

You aro requested to submit the responses to questions included in the enclosure (excluding co; ment Hos. 3 and 6) within 45 days of your receipt of this letter.

If the response to any of these questions has been docket-l ec, you may respond to the question by identifying the specific reference submittals. Please refer to the topic nuuber in ycur response.

The staff vill be contacting you shortly to schedule a meeting to f acilitate our review of your scismic reevaluation results in order to e,uet the topic corpletion dates for your plant.

The reporting und/or recordkeeping requirewents contained in this letter dffect fewer thari tein respondents; therefore, 04) clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

$hj,(

Sincerely, g, f

$201210 M P

O-psa ast Ads)

G 0

AD-

DL y

GLd/nas b D

eld Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief 1

82 1/h /82 Operating Reactors Branch Ho. 5

• Setprevious_ yellow fotaddit.lonal _ Division-of-Licensing SEPB,:DL, g},

_0R,Bf P,M.,

concurrer{ce.

oniah Tntlosutw As stateil, SEPB R,

SEPB:DL,%g/-

F I

..PYChen;#*

.RHengpn,F,

,g,/ ARu $s,0,1,.

.RL,mc.

L

= = V. ' t'c.../e.... Tb,......... S......

y u nc sure:

ee nt xt pag

.1./ 6/.3. 2...

1. /,<,7 /.8. 2....

1./.g /.82

.. -.//. 3../. 8. 2..

1 y....

. g.........

~.

une ronu ais ooaoi uncu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

~

~

~

(

.s g

4

,o 4

gs 2

c, Docket No. 50-155 LS05-82 Mr. David P. Hoffman Nuclear Licensing Adainistrator Consumers Power Corrpany 1945 W Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201

SUBJECT:

BIG ROCVs POINT - SEP TOPIC III-6, " SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS" REVIEW OF LICEllSEE'S SEISMIC PROGRAM PLAN AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The attached enclosure is a sui.naary of the review of the infor: nation (see references at the end of the enclosure) you provided regarding your program for seis'mic reevaluation of your plant facility.

It is presented in the form of a checklist indicating the adequacy of criteria and methodology Unresolved questions are expressed in terms of coments in the surmaary.

It should be noted that even if the methodologies are deemed adequate from a review of program plan, the application of the proposed methods cust be reviewed in detail when the analysis results are available.

You are requested to submit the responses to questions included in the enclosure (excluding comaent Nos. 3 and 6) within 45 days of your receipt of this letter.

If the response to any of these questions has been docket-ed, you may respond to the question by identifying the specific reference submittals. Please refer to the topic number in your response.

The staff will be contacting you shortly to schedule a coettr.g to facilitate our review of your seismic reevaluation results in order to neet the topic completion dates for your plant.

Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch flo. 5 Division of Licensing AD:SA:DL

Enclosure:

Glainas As stated 1/ /82 cc w/enclosuro-See next page SEPB:DL SEPB:DL SEPB:DL ORB #5:Pfi ORB #5:BC omcq sumam)

PYCl

d k..

RHermann WRusse l REmch DCrutchfield l

i> a n >

1/d/82 1/ /82 1/ /82 1/ /82 1/ /82 nuc,mu m oc som~cv e:m V

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

""+>2"2'

p* Etag UNITED STATES o,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{

g WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 g

'j January 19, 1982 s...* /

+

Docket No. 50-155 LS05-82-01-045 Mr. David P. Hoffman Nuclear Licensing Administrator Consumers Power Conpany 1945 W Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201

SUBJECT:

BIG ROCK POINT - SEP TOPIC III-6, " SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS" REVIEW 0F LICENSEE'S SEISMIC PROGRAM PLAN AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The attached enclosure is a summary of the review of the information (see references at the end of the enclosure) you provided regarding your program for seismic reevaluation of your plant facility.

It is presented in the form of a checklist indicating the adequacy of criteria and methodology.

Unresolved questions are expressed in terms of comments in the summary.

l It should be noted that even if the methodologies are deemed adequate from a review of program plan, the application of the proposed methods must be reviewed in detail when the analysis results are available.

You are requested to submit the responses to questions included in the enclosure (excluding comment Nos. 3 and 6) within 45 days of your receipt of this letter.

If the response to any of these questions has been docket-ed, you may respond to the question by identifying the specific reference submittals.

Please refer to the topic number in your response.

The staff will be contacting you shortly to schedule a meeting to facilitate our review of your seismic reevaluation results in order to meet the topic completion dates for your plant.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, ief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure:

See next page

b+

Mr. David P. Hoffman cc Mr. Paul A. Perry, Secretary V. S. Environmental Protection Consumers Power Company Agency 212 West Michigan Avenue Federal Activities Branch Jackson, Michigan 49201 Region V Office.

ATTN: Regional Radiation Representative Judd L. Bacon, Esquire 230 South Dearborn Street Consumers Power Company Chicago, Illinois 60604 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Herbert Grossman, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Joseph Gallo, Esquire U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Isham, Lincoln & Beale Washington, D. C.

20555 1120 Connecticut Avenue Room 325 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Washington, D. C.

20036 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Peter W. Steketee, Esquire,

Washington, D. C.

20555 505 Peoples Building Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Washington, D. C.

20555 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C.

20555 Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant ATTN: Mr. C. J. Hartman Mr. John O'Neill, II Plcnt Superintendent Route 2, Box 44 Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Maple City, Michigan 49664 Christa-Maria Charlevoix Public Library Route 2, Box 108C 107 Clinton Street Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Charlevoix, Michigan William J. Scanlon, Esquire Chairman 2034 Pauline Boulevard County Board of Supervisors Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 Charlevoix County Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Resident Inspector Big Rock Point Plant Office of the Governor (2) c/o U.S. NRC Room 1 - Capitol Building RR #3, Box 600 c

Lansing, Michigan 48913 Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Herbert Semel Mr. Jim E. Mills Counsel for Christa Maria, et al.

Route 2, Box 108C Urban Law Institute Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Antioch School of Law 263316th Street, NW Washington, D. C.

20460

/ 9 /W!A

~ /b 'L

i l

Mr. David P. Hoffman i

CC 1

l Dr. John H. Buck i

Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Ms. JoAnn Bier 204 Clinton Street Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 i

Thomas S. Moore Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 i

1 h

,.,.. _ _ _