ML20039H267

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Public Version of Revision 2 to Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure 440-1, Emergency Communication Sys & Operational Tests. Change Request Form Encl
ML20039H267
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 12/16/1981
From: Pliml G
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Harold Denton
NRC
Shared Package
ML20039H265 List:
References
81-171, NUDOCS 8201200056
Download: ML20039H267 (3)


Text

-

t*

i CR4 91-171 EPIP 440-1 x

t I

Dec. 15, 1981 M.,,.

%) !

\\

l Date i.o Ycu have copy (s) No,'7'# Td gg g

FHI - Fuel Handling. 0- 64rece~ ' dure SOI - Cserating Precedure ECP - Emergency Cperating Pr:cedure

~

p.

GOP - General Cee a*~d-- o-C*a*#'

TSS - Technical Staff Surveillance

~ ' ' '

'~~

C3 ZAP - Ad=inistrative Precedure I-'c gO CP - Chemical Precedure RP - Radiatics Protecti0n P~~ced.,.

DEC?,4 8g 5.O MI

'"aintenance Precedure v-

~ Sicn Cuali:7 Precedure a dM C*'~ C" AOP - Ahnc: mal Cceratin3 p -

c.s.,

e b

G % [i' 4*

33 3ecurity Plan 5 securit' Procedu-a

' %h W

,a. 4

- ~

r,., -

Cperati

-ec.4 spec.

ng Surveillance Tes:

~~

Curie acek Technical Speci~e4, a*-4 + -

~~

AnnunyatcrResponseManual Refueling Master p~- ced"~~e G v GoEP - Gene-

~

.uet r valua*4cr* o ~-.e n.

Ep tp - g e -, =a*- 17 S **a~.4 cn.me r s

---ce4 -. -

s A-encv.

3--

.a.-Z P, an ac l= =-- 4 e

~~U

~~;cn Elect: ca' Distributica,,s u

,,ri a1 3a,,ety Analysis Re=cr,e7 ocedure

~

e Ib"$,7e receipt of the pr:ctdure on revisiens indicate c.f o e- ~n-chis receipt " v utsticn.

'-~ ~ s ' ~v '

n

~~oage,.. :

r- -

  • Please revise per attached changes to EPIP 440 1. pas. 1 thru 15, Rev. O, 1, 2.

Dec. 15, 1981 ns

\\

~

/

N g

.A 1

WD I",

s[

^

n ce\\'. m,M

  • __<, u s,". m,

.G. Plami ~ *.

q o r P:

OcSlure er revisiens indicateci above h

. esived:

. ~..

.. ~

04:e is**-

%og 88a188eaaa8!h

  1. 9 i r

F e

' ' ' ~ ~ "

i s.

m m_

e

,f/

zap 5 51,-4 STATION PROCEDURE CHANGE REQUEST

,jg 'I

""4 DEC 15 1981 CHANGE Precedure Intent changes fequire $tation Review before using.

OUE$T gl, g[

Procedure changes with prior Station Review do not need SRO sporoval.

BER PROCEDURE TITLE ;5ffh'Rdn LT/t/d/ [o,1!/A d4// t.J~73A/k NUMBER - /O MYC-[

A dD o PGn. 871 a un t.- &s r.s Temporary Change C

Permanent Change

,T Expiration Date New Procedure C

Special Procedure C

Desired Effective Permanent Change Needed jg/f/ p Yes C No C Brief Dev,ription V L 5 t=~ IEYl.S Y/ Alb TPI f To ! At t t e> D &~

A L l- -

$ e hr M v si t & *f-77 0 AI LE0 0/?/~ M Lf d I~ A-#./D 0 A&~Tc'A77odat-r*1 ~s ns'

[5e6 MTAC,%fD h I

i~

b M 01 S// 9 -'

Reason for change kffd/$f$.hl---

5 L.S '-

Date ///r'1 /

g,fWh-v 9-Department Requested By Temporary Change Approval (No Intent change,14 da.ys review) l l

Dept. Supervisor Date SRO Date 7

l FORM 5 514 Station Review Copy _

.t

. l*,'

-~*

/

i Yes No /

Is a change to the Technical Specifications needed?

the probability of an occurrence or the consequence of an accident or malfunction of equipment impcrtant to saf ty as previc.c-ly sv31u2*.ed in 1:

the SAR increased?

Yes _ No V_

Benause

  • ? o's't 5 lffiP kWR$iC N Ch'-f a4 2.5 3iMU W Cow &W Li' Qui f ms gwf* p L?gt $ 7 ym Ph.4Al Is the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different t>TeNo r Because:

Yes than any previously evaluated in the SAR created?

$ t.:~V A I".b o v~ t.i

\\

Is the margin of saft, as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification, reduced? Yes No 7 Because:

(3 3 eF t.f"

.h *L-k J In~

4 f-

/

.'. Q,/

(

a 1

!o r

} /t i

" " u -- %-

Date 4

Prepared By Per=anent Review Tc=porary Review Date Appr.

Not Appr.

.Signiture Da.te Appr. Not Appr.

Q Q

/DI

/LllY O Q Q

Signature Q

Q nW7/ /dh/ W Q

Q lGAELllfd V' O O

Station Superintendent:

O O

roved, explain:

Ifr.otapp!

JA #

/2 /S-!!

f f py m <

Effective Date Station Superintendent Appr.,Date

( Appr. for perm. use)

(if different from appr. date)

O e

a