ML20039H193
| ML20039H193 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/16/1981 |
| From: | Pliml G COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039H189 | List: |
| References | |
| A-81-195, A-81-198, NUDOCS 8201190702 | |
| Download: ML20039H193 (5) | |
Text
_. _
i i
CRf A-81-198 EPIP 430-1 1
CR# A-81-195 EPIP 550-5 December 16, 1981 04:e
. b o +1_ & /
You have ecpy(s) Nc. 9f-g y cf $3e gien gg3 ge=,
FE: - Fuel Ean "
- ng ?:ccadure SCI - Cperating ?:cesdure ICP - Isergency Cperating ? cendure CC7 - C-4:eral Cperating ?:cced=e TSS - Te^-' cal Stadd Surveillance
<D ZAP - A Ad-8 strative ? :csd=e g
ZCP - Che ical ?: cedure 8
R2 - Radiatic: ?:::acuic: ? ccedure
- - u.aintsmanes ?:cendurs F.3CE*1,30 9
ZQ? - tic: Quality 7::cmdure t'
DEC2 41931 n, a ACP - Ahac=al C;eratise. ?:cend.:s
-F 237 - Sec=ity Plas & Sac =
n ea n6~2-J'-"p 7':' - Cperating Surveillance,ity ?
csdurs g
r-n,iT a
Tast M
Te ch S = e c. - Te ' - d cal Specidicarica Curve 3cck
~
A unciater Respcase Manual 4
s G
Refueling Masta 7: cadurs & Tuel Ivaluatic: 7:ccad=s CSI? - Generating Sta-d --
e:gancy ?
cedurs IP '
T a:Te==y Pla: =plessating ?:ccadurs
?SAR - Final Safety Analysis Repc -
22D - Zic Ilactrical Disehutic:
?l'aase ack:cwled>e -..4--- --r- :r
. e.. cs._. - s
"-. *. aa ne e
s
.a s
~~~ats, ahcvs and :s::=
es -.
.4--
- v.s..v..A.
e?ac.a, ;Lc 5,
a.
--r-
~~.
December 15,-1981.
0
/
G. Pi -:
?:cend=a c: ravisic $ indicated abcvs Iscsived:
04 a
~
~
s 8201190702 8112 T PDR ADOCK 05000295 F
PDR t
-- 6m mem-e m
= -
=. - - - = = - -
. = _.... -
./
gc9 ZAP 5-514 STATION PROCEDURE CHANGE REQUEST Rn-O c-4-f/ dc_
CHANGE Procedure intent changes require Station Review befc.re using.
REO EST Procedure changes with prior Station Review do not need SRO approval.
0JC
& Mr CM YS# '[
O NUMBER PROCEDURE TITLE l
Permanent Change C
Expiration Date New Procedure O
Special Procedure O
Desired Ef fective
"'**"*"'**"9'""d*d
& /-M Yes O No C Date Brief Description __
/
Reason for change na fa) w a's ett' SD-Y l
Requestad By Date epartment 8A Tempo :ory Change Approval (No intent change.14 days review)
Dept. Supervisor Date SRO Date FORM 5 514 Station Review Copy
g.
~
Is a change to the Technical Specifications needed?
Yes No[
2 Is the probability of an occurrence or the consequence of an accident or malfunction of equipment important poysafty as previously evaluated in the SAR increased?
Yes No A Because:
7 fa 'f WlY'"
C.*
l
~
-a v~
..;<,, M
~y
,A SP:P.sTo -I".
% A,c--ng - w re e, J % pe. Mw p km 9 m]x A
- us w % 'Fritre o-Ted A** '+'.
f Is the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different., type than any previously evaluated in the SAR created? Yes No /-
Because:
s l
1 Is the margin of saf'ty, as defined in th_ efbasis for any Technical Specification, reduced? Yes No X.-
Because:
d, Prepared By Date
/
/d Temporary Review Fermanent Review Sig/ : ina turev,.j ^ Da te_ e,q Signature Date Appr.
Not Appr.
Appr. Not Appr.
0 W +-l / Yb/ W
]
r,# y
,'~ - ]
]
TU h0T'It
~
C3
/
Station Superintendent:
If not approved, explain:
_ o, J
(
d'Ln
/2-IT-FI Station Superintendent Appr. Date Effective Date (Appr. for perm. use)
(if different from appr. date) i
- 7. __ _. _
5 g1 ZAP 5 51p STATION PROCEDURE CHANGE REQUEST
"" o@
/ P 3 -5) ulC.
008/t Procedure latent changes require Station Reviep befora using.
CHANGE Procedure changes witti prior Station Review do not need SRO approval.
REQUEST g
PROCEDURE TITLE TfCA b-Y MW
- I NUMBER LT=jM Q/%
- "9' Permanent Change hpiration Date New Procedure O
Special Procedure O
Desired Effective Date f*/tth>
Permanent Change Needed Yes C No O Brief Description W
W
/
m Reason for change NM
~1 &
OJ'C u&
a~L to %s 4 -tk D"c tas & Q g;,; &
6 f/b Requested By Date
[N Department
/
i Temporary Changa Approval (No intent change,14 days review)
Dept. Supervisor Date SRO Date FORM 5 514 Station Review Copy i
~~
Is a change to the Technical Specifications needed?
Yes N
Is the probability of an occurrence or the consequence of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to saf ty as previously evaluated in the SAR increased?
Yes No A Because:
f
" G%
f C' w f SC owf-WW 4 -c4 P O f-n ur-fA Is the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any previously evaluated in the SAR created? Yes No _ ( Because:
W rh -
Is the margin of saf ty, as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification, reduced? Yes No I Because:
Z
~d' s
Prepared $y MfI('b&#
E te Temporary Review Permanent Review Signature Date
- Appr.
Not Appr.
Si hl r p ) Date Appr. Not Appr.
D D
Mf Yrlp @
~
o n._
9 e
o 0
0 f b/ Q~
Station Superintendent:
N If not approved, explain:
A n/
WM l2-/ C-81 Station Superintendent Appr. Date Effective Date (Appr. for pers. use)
(if different from appr. date)
M epsen aus.ive W_
seeme ge