ML20039G745
| ML20039G745 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point, FitzPatrick, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1981 |
| From: | Haynes R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Leonard J POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039G742 | List: |
| References | |
| 811206, EPL-81-93, NUDOCS 8201190081 | |
| Download: ML20039G745 (9) | |
Text
-
a
...,, s :.. u,
,,e w.
3-
^
.O.
4 NUCLEAR REcVLATCRY CCV?.tt'LJN
/
~.
v,
.J' P /,1 REGiCN i
- ;W)Q'- l o
us*AaK n,o c m.c 1
,M **
KING Q ff 8 8 U$ $8 A P C'9 P,$ Y I.V AN 6 A 114 t. 6 3
y s,
s s
e..
OCT 3 6 '991
$5.:.
e.,,.
~
Cccket No. 50-333 C '.',
,.,A' / ~---;
EFL-21-03
,. -... i s.
I '
?cwer Authority of the State of New York 2s.
Fit:?atrick Nuciear Power Piant A fiH.
Mr. John 0. Leonard Resident Manager
?'. O. Box 41 Lycoming, New York 13093 Gentieren:
Subject:
EMERGENCY PRE?aRECNZ55 EXERCISES ANO ?; FCSED REVISION CF IMcLEME.4TA-~.
- ATE FOR PRCMPT NCTIFICATION SYSTEMS As you are aware, :ne revisec emergency lanning -ule cualished on Augus-13.
!?20, recuires ena energen:y preparedness be u:gracec anc main ained cc n a-and around nuclear cwer plants.
In cetermining :ne adequacy of cifsite crecarecness, :ne NRC c:nsults witn -ne Federal Erergency Managemen-Agency (FEMA), -nicn has the feceral lead in 1 reving off site pre:arecness.
Final FEMA findings are :asec :n reviews anc a:provais wni:n are ac::=clished a:::rci,;
to creposed 'a "F; 350.
In -his a::roval process,.:EMA will not c:nsicer any state er lccal :lan for final a; roval until a fullscale exer:ise nas been c:ncu::ec with the si:e in questten.
The exercise must inciuce ne s a:e.
a;;recriate 1::al g:vernmen entities, and licensees.
Shoulc FEMA notify :he NRC that time;y ;r:gress is not beicg mace uncer 1:s preposec la CFR 350 pr :ecures witn res:ect to the u:gradihs of offsi e plans, NRC may determine tnat this c:ns-itutes a significant deficiency in emergency recaredness and initiate acti:na uncer the NRC regulations.
As you are also aware, for ::ntinued c:epliane,e with the rule, annual, fullscale or small scale joint exercises, as defined in the rule, are also recuired.
FL'rther, a ful! scale exercise must al so be concuc ed before any new license can be grantad. The scheduling of these exercises will be largely at the initiative of state and lccal gcvernments and licens;tes ir c: Ordination witn FEMA regional Offices. The NRC wili ;r0 Vide ccservers for tne ensite as:ec;:
of these joint exer:ises and the NRC regicnal Offices will c:nsul; with :ne FEMA regional offices cn the adequacy of pre;csec scenaries and schedule c:nflicts.
It is in your best interests to c: ordinate your exercise scnedule with that of State and local government and with the FEMA regional offices.
If.ycu have any pr:blems in this c crdination, we will_ attempt to assist you.,Further, I h:ve attached a c py of FEMA's RE? Guicance No. 17 wnich speaks to the need 1
l 4e 8201190001 011207 l
t c
N'1
a 2
i c rnoly a ccoy cf the exercise scenario, which has been coercinated with tne corr:7riate state and 1: cal authorities, to coth the FEMA and NRC Regiona!
l ffices.
FEMA's 5uidaace No. 17 crovides a realistic schecule for su plying scerario and permits sufficient time to review the scenario for': 1) adecus:y a
- 74 + (:esting cf majob areas of e-ergency rescense). 2) a'dequacy of scarario in te-ms of eliciting response of major por:fons of offsite emergency preparecness I
plans, and 2) coordination of coth onsite and offsite observer teams by NRC, FEMA and state agencies. Previously, some scenarios were provided only two i
weeks in advance of the exercise and we found that this did not provide sufficient time if the scenario required changing to better meet the exercise objectives I
cf all participating carties; therefore, we suggest tha: you submit scenarios er a schedule which is consistent with the FEMA guidance.
Additionally, the following comments concerning the conduct of exerci ses reflect FEMA and.NRC caservations during some recent exercises.
1.
The content of the exercise scenarios should be handled en a "need-::-knew" casis, sucn that indivicuals who may be exercise "p'ayers" do not have access to tne scentrio :: be used. We will treat the scanario conten ir like manner sucn that should we choose to :artici: ate in a restonse to the scenario, our " players" will also no: nave seen the scenario.
2.
In order :: make :he exercise a valid test of emergency preparedness, the particular scenario to be run should not be used in " practices". 'abile i
certain functions are similar regardless of tne scenario, certain otners (assessment, protective-action-decision-making, in-plant surveys, etc.)
may differ significantly. Therefore, to the extent practical, training or practice scenarios should differ frcm the scenario used for tne annual, fullscale. exercise.
3.
Careful consideration should be given to the manner in which scenario cues are presented to the players and to the content of the cues,. such that inadvertent cuaching or direction to the player is minimi:ed.,The content and timing of cues should be consistent with information and sources that would be available to the players in a real emergency (e.g.,
simulatec alarms, instrument readings, survey cata, etc.).
This will result in the most realistic participation and interaction by everyone; the coerating staff and their offsite support elements, the NRC, FEMA, i
state and local governments, and others. Exercise controllers should elso be cognizert of actions necessary to ensure centinuity of the exercise withcut unculy hindering nor aiding the participants' initiative, free play and decision making processes.
On a related subject, as you have probably already heard, the NRC is proposing to change the implementation date of prompt notification systems frem July 1, 1981 to February 1, 1932.
I have enclosed a copy of the proposed rule char.ge for your information. This appeared in the Federal Register for ccmment on Septembe r ' ', 1981.
T
~...
J e
i r
e En c '.Cs ui. N o.
1 14ILESTONES FCR EXEBCISE CtSCRVATIC'! M:0 C7.ITIC'JEQ 75 days' Ctate and licensee jointly submit exercise objective to c'EiA and HRC Regional Offices.
- 60. days FE4A and NRC.Re gional Of fices discuss and meet with licensee / State as necessary and prepare response.
45 days State and licensee scenario develcpers submit exercise scenario to FCtA and NRC Regions for review.
l 35 days FE!A and NRC Regions notify State and licensee of scenario acceptability.
30 days FE4A and NRC Regions de'relop specific post exercise critique schedule with the State and advise FE4A and NRC headquarters.
15 days The RAC Chairman and NRC team leader will meet to cevelop observer action plan (where stationed, how nany frem each organisation, what to icek for).
1 day M ee ting, in the exercise area, of all Federal cbservers both ensite and of fsite to finalize assignments, and give instruction E day Exe rcise '
4 E day FE4A and RAC observers caucus to collate observations. NRC observers also ca.tcus to collate observctions.
O day RAC Chairmaa ard URC teaa leader meet, a.,soo, after Ll.cir respective caucuses as practical, to coordinate Federal pa iicipation in critique.
E to + 1 day Joint RAC/NRC critique General Acenda A.
State, locals and licensee present their views.
B.
Critique of of f site actions, by Rt.C Chairman.
C.
Critique of onsite actions, by NRC.
D.
CIitique of Federal response (if applicable), by RAC Chairman.
E.
Opportunity for clarification questions or ccaments by licensee, State and locals (press and publie questions will not be entertained during the critique).
+ 15 days Written critiques by FE4A Region to Stat *, with copics to l'C4A headquarters and NRC and by NRC Region to licensee with copies
(
to NRC headqua rters and FCit..
(Recommended Suspense Dates)
~~
I
4 Guid' nce Mercorandum 17~
a Radiological Emergency Preparedness Division i
a JOINT EXERCISE PROCCOURSS s
t t
In the interest of assuring that the health and safety of the public is protected in the event of an accident at a nuclear power plant, it i
is necessary. for the licensee (applicant), to conduct an emergency preparedness exercise jointly with apprcpriate State and local agencies.
The role cf the Federal government at such exercises is to evaluate the capability of the utility and the State cad local governments to protect the public health and safety in the event of an accident at the facility.
The FE4A official responsible for this activi$y is the appropriate Regicnal i
Director.
Over the last few months there have been several joint exercises where FEiA and NRC have made reviews botn orally in af. cpen meeting, and in written form. We find however, significant variation among regions in the procedures used for providing the evaluation. The need for a standardized approach I
is evident' and the following is a guide for both FEiA and NRC personnel
)
involved in exercise evaluation.
Assignmen'ts for offsite observers will be made by the RAC Chairman. Onsite observers will be assigned locations by the NRO Team Leader. A meeting-of al'. parties should be conducted prior to the exercise to assure tha'e all observer lwe tions 'are staffed by an evaluator, a; vell ts to make whatever last minute changes are necessary based en field conditions, number c' i
evaluators available, etc.
l
.he exercise should be followed as soon as possible by a critique.
The critique is a working session for preliminary review of the exercise between the participants (State and local cfficials and utility representatives and j
the Federal observer teams headed by lEiA and the NRC). It should be cpen j
to the public and the media. They shoulf, however, attend as observers, and g
not participate in the discussions. If local circumstances dictate that a private session be held with the State authorities, it must be scheduled in advance and the information provided by the RAC Chairman at the private i
meeting should be repeated in the open session.
t e
R 4
i 1
2 i
i 4
-)
t e
i
.l It is desirable to ccaduct tne critique with all the principal parties present, (e.g. the RAC, the involv?d Stste and le:al auckorities, the licon:ce and NRC).
There may be situations where such a joint critique is not feo:ible and se,narate sessions (one ralated to licensee participitien and ca.a related to State and local participa*.icn) are necessary due to
'neistical or funding constraints.
These situations are to be cleared in advance thru the intA/NRC Steering Committee.
In such cases the RAC Chairman sheuld be available for both critiques.
The joint critique shculd be chaired by the RAC chairmen and shculd be within or near the 10 mile EPC.
As part of ens everall format the RAC Chairman will discuss observations of the effsite response and the NRC w.ll discuss observations of the ensite response.
The State, local governments and utility shculd be present at this meeting to make pre-sentations.
For the joint critique to be effective, it should take place within the 24-hour period immediately following the exercise.
There should also be cpportunity for clarification, questions or commants by liccasee, State and local officials.
The RAC Chairman's cve rview statement should be based on comments frca RAC members and other FE1A observers as well as his cwn observation.
It should include the strcng peints as well as a general statement on the deficienl'.cs noted.
Under no circumstances will the RAC Chairman's comments indicate that the State or local plans passed or failed.
He/she should indicate that the comments are preliminary to be followed by a ccmprehensive evaluation within 14 days.
The 'inal FEM A findings and detarmination, as well as approval of a State and/or local plan, submitted according to 44 CFR 350 of which the exercise is a part, is reserved to the i
Associate Director for Plans and Preparedness in Washingten.
~
The principal milestones for FE4A and MRC exercise obser a_tien and critique are given in Enclosure 1.
Chese milestones are for planning purposes and actual schedules may need to be dif ferent because of local circumstances.
1 o
-7 :
i e
- a a
3 Ihn inforTation contained in this letter regarding resocnses is not sucject to na clearance :rocecures of tne Cffice of Management and Eudget as requirec 'y 13 Paper crk Recuction Act of I?EO, FL 96-511.
Sincerely, i
1
}
A
.%.fb t Ronald CI. Eaynis---)
i Director
Enclosures:
1.
FEMA RE? Guidance Memerandum #17 2.
Proposed Rule Change cc w/encis:
George T. Be. ry, President and Chief Operating Officer r
J. P. Bayne, Senior Vice President-Nuclear Generation A. Klausmann, Director, Quality Assurance M. C. Cosgrove, Site Quality Assurance Engineer J. F. Davis, Chairman, Safety Review Com.mittee C. M. Pratt, Assistant General Counsel G. M. Wilverding, Manager-Nuclear Licensing 1
i Noe Resident Inspector state of New York 4
l t
T I.
i, 4
I
- -..._ac.
r-N'
- =-~3
?.d==1 l'ad-ter / V cl. 40. N e. 12 / M hy. Septa =her n.
.,,reccaed Rules a
.h-ilcatoncfit,F*nl fL.nai: !c. wbc: efec:ve. wdlbe 1:M.1:M. (c USC M41. M41 M+ 1. =!e58 cd
- t** ected. Secces ms aho issued app!!cd to cactn3 cec.stn: ;r ceedicis
?
li useer ec. tr. ss Stat. 3::(c USC 03.:1.
- w ~n -~'g a-d S.reces w-432 aMassad :dar sec. u4.
"",. 7*7"' g. f.'.'. to is. sues erg "~.yg" c.: Sat. ;R as ame=dd (u USC :M a
h* f,'".
- .:. !.: prepcsing in s
~ ','L-f '_. Q^ ]' g'! % ef c.. -.
,,3 c;;r ra.ht $1 far.cc:ta pmod fcr E*ct=8 *
- C1C !"'2*dc:d****c 155-cc-cd4 daccmci s. pr :nridad is 83 0"W" US C N IC' D 7'#
%(s)(:1 <- dd:ot a: ply to my b=;dar:swidds RJ NJ. :y U::ihiCy M
(.
g, 3..
? r. t
_c.!c =ca2==:n systc 1r:cu:::=s t b =c=rUnce wth es Rei !11:r7 es cut.:43 (c USC ::rtim: 11 to. C. so. t.
. by Febru ry 1.1"2 ds ne.v d:edba Flenblity Act cf::ac. 5 USC. 35(bl.
a:d :c. s tasad --* sec.1:a. ca stat. ssa, data.If a !!censea is not 5 c =plianca the Cc==ussion ec=cludes that this ru!s as a=<=ded (u U.1C =(c), a:d ce laws enth this r qui. ;.ent by Febinary 1.
wdl not.1! prc=ulgated. have a niarnd ta is Approdices.
19 de Cc=uJssics wdl cc: aider sigadcast ecc:c=ici= pact en a
- 1.Section IV.D.3 cf Appendix E to taking s;;re; nata en: orc==ent actens substantial nu= der cf :=all endtes Us Psrt 'A !.s revised to read as foUcwa:
- rct=ptly et that ti=e. b detar..iniM propcsed
- :!a cenceres an extensica cf acprepna'.a en! cree =e 1 act.cn to de operstenal data fer public 0
N E':"~~8 d i=tista, the Cc==ission wd1 taks into not lusden system. fcr nuclear pcwer
'F' 1
account, a=cq cther fac* cts, the plants !! censed punuant to See:ces IC3
- b= castrated d!!! genes ci de licensee and 104b of de Ate
- sic Energy Act cf D Na"# ** -*"'
in attempn g to fulfill de prc=;t pub!!c 1954. as amended. 4:USC. ::*3. :1 A b.
matdcstica capabiHty requist=est.no ns elec=c utility e==pa:ies cwt:ing 2 ^ 1C' '" Sh*II h*" D' C3c4bdrF to 2 =isaica w.11 cc=. sider whether the and operat'. t dose cucisaa power a_s kept the NRC ! f:r=ed of plants are dom =-t in deir service-j
- ** ', d p
u..
tf.3 steps that it has taken. wbec cse areas and do net fail within tha dtar dach..4 an emansen.na Uca..sieo steps wers taxen and any su; dcant da*nidcs of a =.all business fcund in' shall r'=-wme sta cat the Statshcal p.mble=s enccuntered. and the updated Secten 3 cf the 9 -all Busisna Ac:.13 cecais han ce capaowty to -n a puca ti= stable which the Ucenses expects USC. 5:2. Or wtthin the Sciall Businass coefcacen decai=n prec:ptly es bete wdl be cat in achieving full co=pN"M SI:s Standards set fcrth in is CFR Part i= tar =ed by da h-e of as e=wi4.=ey c=ccr.cm. By Fe' rsary 1.12:*. sach :uczar with the pr==pt ;nblic =cti"cstica 122. Is additien. sicca de nr r--==r capabdity require =ents.
extends for cce ar$e data by whfch P'"# "*' *~*" ***Il d'*
ac=:menen ar,4 p6cm means an been the pu'lic =ctifcatica systems are to be
tahitzhed fcr alere=g and providi:s prompt With respect to requests fcr c
c:ce=ption 4 :t NRC h:s received frc=1 cpersticnal, ths busi essas cud state d um
--. r:seter!!censees a:d tec31 g;ye:==ents inve[ved i= the
,{ces eju
,~
g concm3 the pec=pt public,
=anufacturs and !:stallatics cf these panad !: to C: A so wa)(:) fer es car ecies conf!catica requirement and r cad:Icas.
systa=s are not eccccmically aHectedin of :=ergenn ;ian def.cancies shail :ct for1:stallation and operat!cnal any sigti5 cant =an=*r. Au. d!rts!y.
aspir to dad =seen in the i:dal icatar.ation i
capabdity de C.:==fssica has decided thers is no signiccant ecenct=ic i= pact of this pielle noc cacco system that la a
to deny these requests tn !!ght of tre en t. substantial nu=her cf :=all requind by February 1.isa: no dests:t proposed extensica cf the July 1.1331 entities, as dei!=ed in the Repdatcry objectw of de pre =r;t public notfcaom date. Any licensee not able to =eet the Fiexshdity Act of 1:30.
'Y'"m 8281158 to h8" de capahery *n essentially cernim the imt al acidcat an of sew deadl!. e date of February 1.1Sa:
wdl be subject to enforcement penaltes Paperworx. Reductica Act Stat =rar"*
6 t:ublic mt de plu=e crpesure F"'Y D'6s abat is ciantn.ne after de new date. T'.:is previsics wdl Pursuant to the provimiens cf the el!=inate u=necessary and ccatly Paperwork Reduction Act ofIsec pch.
ha jed.a r Ecae a o 8'
e ad=inistrative actic=.s needed to
!96-511), the NRC has =ada a (mthis is cumutes of de ttm that State and censider present ext =ption requests deter =ination that this preposed rule local eSicals are coc ed that a situation a
that wd1 essentially beccee = cot by the does not imposa new recordkeerg.
exista reqmnug urgent sction) to the mere preposed extensica of the July 1.1981 infor=stic:i collectics. cr report:g Lly events wem dere is subst=naal um andable far de State and local date.His appreach will also per=it de requ'rt= tents.
NRC to focus t's censideratiott upon a Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act cf sonrn===tal occals to make a lodgment whethat er not to ecuvete de puhtic reduced su=her of 33nc::=plianc8 1954. As a= ended, the Energy ectacauen sysumm em ia a dee ten s
situations which remain at the ti=e of Reorgani:stics Act of1974. as ac: ended.
to actnN de notEcadC3 sYsuni, ce State the new dead!!ne. It is expei. ed that the ar.d Section 553 of Title 5 ef de United e
der to etest eiEcient use of NRC resources will States Code. notice is hereby given that g*,2 mup e
y, be achieved by $!s :: tcent of present adoptfon of the fellowing a=end=e=t to e.ltan.msiy er in a snduated or suced exe=ptics requests relating to the July 1.
10 CB Part 50. Appendix E is m-wr.no respensthmty far sceratina 1981 cperaticcal date reqtun=ect.
cente= plated, such a pub!Ic nonScaces system shah remais If the preposed rule is subseque:tly mth the apprepnate genr==ent authonties.
prc=u! gated as a final rule. it la the PART 50--OCMEST1C 1.: CENSING CF Commissien a present intentics to make pRCCUCTICH AND UT11.!ZATICN lt eHective f==ediately upon FAC:1.!T1ES Dated at Washf=gton. D.C. $!s teth day cf publication, pursuant to 5 U.S.C-September iset.
553(d)(1), since the rule is expected to De autherf ty citatien !ct Part 50 Fer the Nuc!e er Regulatory Qmminica.
relieve the cb8igatics of certain reads as fol?cws:
j g
licensees with respect to the present Audorttrt Sets. ic3.104. tet.152. 33.12s.
3'## " 7 O ' D " 'i"# "
July 1. IS81 desdl!se fer operationsi es Stat. 23s. nr. s4a. 953. 254. 955. s5a, a e
(" D" '5-"8 r
- $'****'"8
},ublic =ctification systems. !s that a= ended (4: l!.1C. =33.==. :=1. =2.
saLwe ccos re'**'-as regard de Cc==ission notes that the
- =3. =321: eecs...".1. 3? =8. Sa Stat.1:42.
t
- .s*"
i 4W.., e.a.i.
" deral Redster / Vci. 48..No.132 / mnday. Septe=ter :.10c': /.
.csed Ru.les Way Te 10 CFR Part 50 Er lu!y 1.1s41. ce sudear ;ower react:r the extended d=a peried kr
!!censee shad de: :. state tat cc=;Uance.
Err ergeng Planrung and ad::uniscrauve and ;hysical eter.:s have bees ne Cc-,*ston s de=s,en to dde-t Fte;:roditcas fcr ProducJcn and enabw.ed fer Cr=re ar.c ;roncing ;re':;t estucu :s de ;Mc w,c= ce ;m=e de data fer nW. g fuH Utni::t!cn F c!11 ties e7; caters pecwey EF ne design obectvs
!=pleme=tacon of the ;r :;t ucJc
..C:XCTt.YJC12ar 30T*2} ate."/
sr.si! he to has- :. e es:45ti!*y 'o esseses07
- t:festcu capacility reqcir*=:ent vi?
C4 - - 4 sic 3.
c :-':iets t:e 1:2cs! r.ct:fcauca of de cub 3C ggde, g3 h3c;g9d ghoyg, a{tep
""N h*N:' = ****/C-adi:::21 c::siderscc: :t indes*rf-
- -
- ::.et:c: et ;te;cseu er.h :airg.
wti'us about 1c c=wt:s.
gggC gg.,g;7 {3 ggqt n,; g, r.uuswm ne Nuclear Rep! story na NRC stai!has evaluated the les el
=ecessary equi;=est. per=:ts. and Cc==issica is preposing to amend its of compliance by t:e industry and cated dents:ces. His preposed deferral dce regu!stic=s to extend de date by which dat cely about is of NRC power ct r pres-nt any funds =e=tal 3
prc=;t pubuc ctf!cadon syste=s =ust reactor Ucansees have been able to meet departurn frecx the rationale the j
8 ity the Jdy 1.1981 date ferinstallatien Cc 4 ica usedin ade;cng and be c;eratic:al arcusd =H :uclear power u
plants.no preposed extensics is bs:ed ci a ;rc=pt pu lic notf! cation syste=1 sustaicing de public :ctficaces cs indu.stry-wids d:iSc:ity in acquinns witch meets the entena b 10 CFR 50.47 capabuity requin=ent.See Enal Ruis the recessary eq :p=ent. ;er=:ts. and 50.M. and Appendix E to Put 50. De en E=egency Ptar-* 45 FR 554c.
deen:m. If adepted the preposal licensees inability to =*et de July 1.
554c7 (Aug.19.1980)..-iccasideretica
'vculd es.t :-! de ce=:1:anca date !ct 1981 date has been attnbuted to the denied. C. -No.1 NRC S::o (1540). 3 dese syste=s 7:= J.;v L 13J1 to :o unicreseen di!!iculties and unemainties is de Cc==ission's cc :::ed judg=ea' 8
later das Febr:ary 1. Isa:.
su.-mundins the desigues. ;tecun:t.
that ;rc=;t puhue notifcscon is as
--v~._..C==ent period ex;.res Oc cber and hataf!=1 cf is ;:ecret =cufesc=s
!=portant canaiderscen ts de cdsite J:t. Cc==ents reemved aitar dia syste=s. 5 estsh e 1 cm prutecdon of the pubile in the event cf a
-11 he cc:sidered if it is pnedeal
!=;le=a =tten data, de '.-m ise:ca
-~'aar sc= dent. Dia cf. site ;rotecdcs r
- c. but assu.an=a cf ccustdarsd=2 was e ::= e i dat d=== fae:oes would cf de pubile I:ciuhs a "- '= cf
- vived,_tt spt as to cc===c*
L:bbit t$ ehdity to c---ly md a shoet separste stepe-etccs=cco clthe
. ;: er bdcre tis dats.-
cchednis and set $s July 13a1 date witfL otand_al seventy ci tea ac= dest by da ac:ar.::t= Sterested per-ens ars dis is -ie 4 Bs FR 5:4cq.
EdUry, c====acaccus ci de pen =ved inytted to rub =t wn:*en ec==ents a=d Whils ;!cr e==3' e~--N-~ with da threst w cHuta audendes, dec:.;cs by suggesdc=s en the proposal to de
-=;t =ccfcacca require =ect has edatta ci!Icais en the :: sed fcr Secetary of de Cr-+ ica. U.S.
been delayed. da NRC c=nsiders dat preteedve ac=cs, cap.abstry to epnad Nudear Replatcry Cc-* sten.
e =ge:cy pises and pre;and: ass have puhHe war...=g. a=d ac=al r==mna by Washingtoa. D.C. -l05:.5. Attendet=
sigufcastly != proved within is last de pubi!c. na e=ergency F-N reh Decketi:g r.d Service dra:ch. Ccpies of year at and aren:d every =: clear ;cwer la pre =: sed czs rect.c=g to de extect c:==ents received by de Cc==issics plant sits. Dit insis-2"ent pomaahle-%nd to da extent da NRC cas
=ay be need in de C laaien's
!=;r:vement has been ce=d._.ed by regulate--de c s requ: red fer and de Pubile Document Rec = at 1717 H St ett NRC r.ma who have vi.ited a cu=ter
-r-tsinty asaodated wid each step.
NW, West.1: sten. D.C.
of ;! ant sites to evuuate tr a licensees
- Every aspect of da rde. including the Pcm ruirrMen mmmeances ceseracr:
cc=pliacco with de upgraced prc.:;t notfcaticu ryste= is s=!!
Er.an X. Cn=es. Dinece. Divisics cf e=eqe cy ;6*g rep!adena of required. s c'nas g de E=egency Prepared:ess. Cf?.cs of August IGM. 6 id:de:. the Federal t=;1e=entates data cf de ;r==pt Inspeedes and E fercement. U_S.
7-
- sency Nasagemea.t Age:cy puhuc:otaratice capa' tHty c
Nuc!est Replatory Com=issica.
(FDIA) ano.he NRC have =c=itered require =ent. de Cc--Nsico recepi:es Washington. D.C. :::155 (te:epboce: 3c1-
- " - cus suc! ear e=egency exer =ses de ce=ti ued :eed fer dis requin=ect sot 4a14).
Involvi=g State and !ccal gover==ests and exgets allunlides to ec=plets de and the lic=: sees, and agam have testallaccu of this system as seco as e.. awerarr mecauano,e wit==ssed a sig=tHeant b= prove =est cu pracdcable but =ot later das Feb=ary L no Proposed Rula enstte and oEsite e=egency 1.19E:. Mcwever, de Q==issten Cs Aupst 19.1980, the Nue! ear preparedness.
Intenda to take apprcpriate e=!crec=r Replatory Co==f ssion published is the Based en the abeve ! for=atfen and acdcs against !!ce= sees who did cer.
Federal Register (45 FR 554c:)
en a recep:itien that there exist prier to Jdy 1.19et so !y de 1
amend =ena to its replattens (10 CFR custa=ary wan:ing systems (polics.
Cc==!ssion of their !=abiUty to meet Part 50 and A;;endix El cencerni=g the rad!a. telepbese), which are viewed as the Idy 1.1581 deadll e.
ucg ad!:3 of e=er2ency preparedness, suf! dent!y efective is many postdatad ne + et date cf dese repdaticca acddest sce= aries, the Cct==issics la SipiEcant I!censee perfer=ance
- <e=ber 3.1000. A=ceg other prepcsing to defer de t=ple entsden.
stre:gis and weaksesses are evaluated things, the reguladocs required licensen date of the proc:pt public :otiacatics is is NRC Systematic Assess =ent cf to subcut upgraded e=egency plans by capability require =ent f.ect Idy 1.1981 1.!censee Feder=acca (SAI2). De SAI.P landary 2.1931. submit i=;!e=estir:g to February 1.19a?. In view cf the preg 2= specacaHy ! dudes evaluatte precedures by March 1.1S81. a d above, de Cc--hsics E:!.s that there of hee =see perfor=a:ce != e=egesey imple=e=t the e=egency plans by A;rti exists suf!de:t reason to beIIeve that prepartdsess. Acccrdingly, a lice =se(t 1.1381.
epptspriate protective =cesures can ederts in attempting to meet the Ju.iy.
One element that must be anc wC1 he taken for &e ;rctecten of 1961 date for hstelling the prc~:ct de=cestrated in an acceptable the health a:d safety of ds puhuc in the pubuc sot 1Heatfes capahtlity wiu be,
licensee's emeqency plan is dat event of a radiolcycal e=egency dunng fact:rin dat Ucensee's SALP.
d.
t.
,p
l l
u
. g
.._.w.
Exhibit D 1
h w