ML20039E975
| ML20039E975 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1981 |
| From: | Faulkenberry B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Mazur D WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039E976 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201110682 | |
| Download: ML20039E975 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000460/1981010
Text
0
?
}
l
.
3
1
H
%
r
f
1
g
y
..
,
DEC 2 21981
Docket Nos. 50-460, 50-513
$4
,
N@,
[
\\<D
,
c1
Washington Public Power Supply System
t
gM
G15'*]b
P. O. Box 968
T
3000 George Washington Way
(!
.
Richland, Washington 99352
(Q
s
a
'
s x '/
-
Attention: Mr. D. W. Mazur
,
Program Director, WNP-1/4
N 'i,,i 5
Gentlemen:
Subject: NRC Inspection of Washington Nuclear Projects 1 and 4
This refers to the special inspection conducted by Mssrs. P. Narbut, R. Dodds,
G. Hernandez, A. Toth, and A. D'Angelo of this office on November 16-20,
1981 of activities authorized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-134 and
CPPR-114, and to the discussion of our findings held with Mr. D. W. Mazur
and other members of your staff at the conclusicn of the inspection.
The inspection was a special team inspection to assess the implementation
of the revised quality assurance program as submitted to the NRC and the
effectiveness of management controls for the project. The inspection consisted
of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews
with personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the
scope of this inspection. Ilowever, the findings of this inspection indicated
that a certain weakness exists in your quality assurance program. This
area is discussed in Appendix A and paragraphs 5.a-5.d of the Inspection
Report. As discussed in the managenent meeting of November 20, 1981, pi9ase
provide within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter a discussioit
of the actions you have taken or intend to take to correct the area of weakness
summarized in Appendix A.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosures
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room unless yoti notify this office,
by telephone, within ten days of the date of this letter and submit written
\\
application to withhold information contained therein within thirty days
of the date of this letter. Such application must be consistent with the
requirements of 2.790(b)(1).
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad
to discuss them with you.
8201110682 G11222
PDR ADOCK 05000
y j
.' 'd
h"
' "I
ST '
NRN'dNDE""s
'"
..h.
"D
Gil '
. . . " . .
1 '0iYE Blithy'.
"
' "
D
T
.u
. ..... .. y .
,. ...... ..
.. .
.. ..
.
.
. .. .
. ..............
. .. .12/.17/S[..12/R:/81. .. .. 12Shal.
.12/4.t./.U... .
12B,!,!81,,
,,,,,12/,)f,/,81, , 12(,2/,(,8,1 , ,, ,
">
suc eosu m no em nscu om
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
" "'o " -32m *
3
-.
_ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
_
_
,
._:
.
o
.. .;
e
.A.
-
.-
.
Washington Public Power Supply System
-2-
,
.
.
.
k
.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
, ' ^ , . . .;
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget
--
' _ .
,
as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
,
Sincerely,
."
'
,
- "
w
it !. CODS
'
.
.
.
9. H. Faulkenberry, Chief
Reactor Co'struction Projects Pranch
,
Enclosures:
-
..
A.
Significant Onservations
.
'
O
IE Inspection Report
.
Nos. 50-460/81-10
50-513/91-10
.
cc w/o enclosure:
R.
Glasscock, Quality Assurance Director
~ d ' .7
'
"
G. C . Sorens en , WPPSS
l-
<
.
.
II (
,
{ l
j 'll'f
. )!l f(
l
,
,
'
>
l',
(
)Ij
f'l
-
iLowis)
- -
'
, tat. at
.w
J 't
( ,v / i e'rm
- )
'
I)
" ,.
es
.h ih n', . ir
w / fi tlli
-
.;o.
t.jr.
/ R)
.
,, , i
nt ',
.
0*
-
p.
" 3
s,
[. j . .
-"i..*'.[ * -
..
.
.
_
.
-__-
-
-
-
.
-
.
-
A_PPENDIX A
SIGNIFICANT 995ERVATIONS
Washington Public Power Supply Systen
Docket Nos. 50-460, 50-513
P. O. "ox 968
Construction Permit Nos.
3000 George Washington Way
CPPR-1 M ani CPPR-174
Richland, Washington 993S?
As a result of the insoection conducted on November 16-20, 1991, the followinq
siqnificant observatien was identified in your quality assurance prograr
Further information on this item is included in detail in paragraphs Sa-5d
of IE Inspection Report Mos. 50 460/513/T'l-In .
I' -
2A_ _Pr01rg!
T he ';uppl y S ys teu's nA proqra"1 for the N';P-1/4 project is not fully
1" scribed by orocedure or fully implemontei as currently described at this tim
i
This nhservation is reinforroi by the followinq:
I
hos er ip t i on
1.
The 1A Requirements Manual is current 1y issued as an interim
unual
Paragraph
a.fil,
'
T'
Dequirements Manual is not consistent with the PRAR
'
b'viation request semittoa to the ';Pr - Dara;raph 5.a.(!).
t
'he- i :p l eme n t i n u :~!u a l i t y Msurance Inst ruc tions InM 's) da
not fully imple,ent the PEAR ieviation request or the JAR
% nua!
Paraoranh C a.f2).
!.
TV ';I f or nA personnel infortrination a nci training Joes
not reflect what i s prart i Td - P ara'ir ant' E.c.fil
I. ".n l e "n.t a t i t i n
. . .
..-
ert t in > ro 5 l e> < m not 'ojni Srn,e;ht ta t ne att ent i,n 1:f
a n , pnen t , s
c-
y si nifi< int
br:. or.t at 'on nrot: lens f ar
c vmlet e i nk a
],
lonos
Pirlor?nh
i h a n ci
Q.1,
t
-
%
f5
)
g
'
.
' '
(
.'p ! eon - t i t ' in
6
}
t
- -
h
t .1 1 ny nor y
" 3 r 3 ' r' a f 5 . ' ili
4
..
'veill ence i nspectinns have been narrow ir scope an i there
4
'
nas noe.
3 lack af wrv-illance of critira' s cir k ac+ivitios -
i r a n r an 's
,r
ll
P
..
..
2-
_
u
2
c.
Surveillance followup was not conducted per procedure - Paragraph
5.c.(3).
f.
Monthly Quality Assurance data for performance evaluation
has not been provided to the Corporate Quality Director as
requested - Paragraph 5.c.(5).
g.
QA Surveillance staff did not take timely action upon discovery
of a significant drawing control problem - Paragraph 8.k.
. .
4