ML20039C595

Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900378/81-01 on 811012-16 & Notices of Deviation & Nonconformance

ML20039C595
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/08/1981
From:	Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Swanson N NAMCO
Shared Package
ML20039C596	List: ML20039C595 ML20039C600 ML20039C604 ML20039C608
References
REF-QA-99900378 NUDOCS 8112290501
Download: ML20039C595 (2)

Text

.

DEC0S 6 os 9

Docket No. 99900378/81-01 RECEWED E

DEC2819615h De$w"Y" '

NAliC0 Controls Division

~

Acne - Cleveland Corporation ATTN: Mr. N. E. Swanson q,

President 149 Cucmber Street Jefferson, Ohio 44047 Gentlemen:

This fefers to the inspection conducted by Mr. W. E. Foster of this office on October 12-16, 1981, of your facility at Jefferson, Ohio associated with the manufacture of limit switches and to the discus-sions of our findings with Mr. L. E. Ward and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was adde as a result of the: (1) identification of in-termittent operation; and (2) concerns regarding the Quality Assurance Program pertaining to limit switches that have been furnished to the Quad-Cities and Perry Nuclear Power Stations, Unit 1 and 2.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertienestrequirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

The Notice of Violation is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of 19 CFR Part 2.201. You are required to submit to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter, erwritten statement containing:

(1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description ofssteps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the dates $but correctiveaactions and premative measures were or will be coupleted. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

~

.The responses directed by this letter are not hubject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

8112290501 811208 PDR GA999 ENVACME

" "}" "

--l1 99900378 paa omch RIV [3 h

@)

givi

,1"

- biys" Wy@"

_gl avor"" w ir g -

WEFoster/rf-IBarnes' tPotapovs-JEGatti ar JfC lins ""

..l.l/.24/,8,1.,

,,1 ] /,,, /M,,,,,,

,l M y,/R1,,,,

,1 M f,,1... ;.

.),$/1/21.,,

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

MANC0 Controls Division Cleveland Corporation You are also requested to submit a similar written statement 6or each item which apperrs in the enclosed Notice of Nonconfomance.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Comission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Docment Roon.

If this report-containt any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 0.5(a)(f), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this offffe to withhold such information. If your mceipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established. ConsisteeA with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the infomation which identifies the document or part sought to bewwithheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the inforr.ation thould be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4), The infonnation sought to be withheld Hall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.

If we do not hear from you in this regard Mthin the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection,wwe will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

,c ne sened

• U.POTAPO #

Uldis Potapoys, Chief r

l Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Appeddix A - Notice of Violation 2.

Appendix B - Motic-if Monconformance 3.

Appendix C - Inspection Report No. 99900378/81-01 4.

Appendix D - Inspection Data Sheets (11 pages) bec:

Chief, V&SPB, DR&RRI, HQS (Rein'muth)

IE Files e

AE00' NMSS i

QAB NRC:PDR.

Reg. Directors, I, II, III, V vtuagil arco, xiv

"'C ' >

........ - ~.

• ""' A

..... ~..

~

DATEk i

unc ro = si. no..o, sac-on' OFFICIAL RECORD COPY