ML20039B166
| ML20039B166 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/03/1981 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Dubrow A BYRON JACKSON PUMP |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039B167 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900289 NUDOCS 8112220365 | |
| Download: ML20039B166 (2) | |
Text
-
DEC 03 1331 D'I Docket No. 99900289/81-02 q
n;,
V.\\
- p_..., _7 r
Nuclear Valve Division tg "'DEC 21193g Borg Warner Corporation ATTN: Mr. A. L.. DuBrow President and General Manager
$;N~W 7500 Tyrone Ave.
f Van Nuys, California 91409 h
gW Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA program inspection conducted by Mr. J. W. Sutton of this office on October 5-9, 1981, of your facility at Van Nuys, California, associated with the manufacture of nuclear valves and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. C. P. Spiegel, Vice President, und members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspectior..
This inspection was made to confim that, in the areas inspected, your QA program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being achieved; nor to assure that a specific product, component, or service provided by you to your customers is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components, or services procured from others. You should, therefore, not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents, nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and mpresentative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the irppector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written statement containing: (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
The response reouested by this letter is not subject to the clearance pro-cedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork,
Reduction Act of 1980, Pl.96-511.
i n h ome,p C
VI
/,
,/ JGagli o
})AES
'RIV 5
M....ollins
.. en,12,2,2036 5 e 1120a,......./..[........
... ) JSut b
UPotapov 81 o n> 12/1/81 12/l../81 12/s/
1 /p /81 99900289 ORG : 4 eon..................
NRC FC#RM 318 (tor;80t NRCM O2do OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Nuclear Valve Division 2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any infomation that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) sun-mit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such infomation. If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are svailable for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.
Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the infomation which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the infomation should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The infomation sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit. If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will' be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A - Notice of Nonconfomance 2.
Appendix B - Inspection Report No. 99900289/81-02 3.
Appendix C - Inspection Data Sheets (6 pages) bec:
IE/V&SPB (Reinmuth)
IE Files AE0D NMSS NRC:PDR QA3 REG. Directors I, II, III & V JEGagliardo, RIV ASME NBB&PVI
' " ^"'>
DATEk
' " " " " " ' ' ' " ~ * ' " " * " *'
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY i